throbber
DLA Piper LLP (US)
`33 Arch Street
`26th Floor
`Boston, Massachusetts 02110-1447
`www.dlapiper.com
`
`Larissa S. Bifano
`Larissa.Bifano@dlapiper.com
`T 617.406.6013
`
`July 13, 2022
`VIA E-MAIL
`david.liston@listonabramson.com
`docket@listonabramson.com
`
`MR. DAVID G. LISTON
`LISTON ABRAMSON LLP
`THE CHRYSLER BUILDING
`405 LEXINGTON AVE, 46TH FLOOR
`NEW YORK, NEW YORK 10174
`
`Re: WAG Acquisition, LLC v. The Walt Disney Company et al, 2-21-cv-08230(CDCA)
`
`Dear Mr. Liston:
`
`I write regarding the petition for inter partes review (IPR) being filed with the Patent Trial and
`Appeal Board (PTAB) to challenge the validity of the claims in U.S. Patent No. 9,762,636. The
`table below lists the grounds of invalidity being asserted by The Walt Disney Company, Disney
`Streaming Services LLC, and Hulu LLC (collectively “Petitioner”) in the IPR.
`
`Patent No.
`
`Proceeding No.
`
`Claims
`
`Grounds
`
`9,762,636
`
`IPR2022-01227
`
`1-12
`
`§ 103(a) over Carmel.
`
`9,762,636
`
`IPR2022-01227
`
`1-12
`
`§ 103(a) over Carmel in view of Shteyn.
`
`Petitioner hereby stipulates that in the event the PTAB institutes an inter partes review including
`the grounds listed in the table against the corresponding claims, Petitioner will not assert in the
`above-captioned litigation the same invalidity grounds asserted in the IPR, or any other ground
`that Petitioner reasonably could have raised in the IPR petition, against the corresponding claims.
`
`In so stipulating, Petitioner seeks to avoid multiple proceedings addressing the validity of these
`claims based on the instituted grounds. Rather, through this stipulation, Petitioner expresses its
`intention to have only the PTAB address the instituted grounds of invalidity of these claims. But,
`for the sake of clarity and to avoid any doubt, if the PTAB declines to institute any of the
`grounds identified herein, Petitioner reserves the right to assert such grounds in the above
`captioned litigation. Additionally, even in the event of institution, Petitioner reserves its rights to
`
`IPR2022-01227
`EXHIBIT 1027 - PAGE 0001
`
`

`

`July 13, 2022
`Page Two
`
`assert in the above-captioned litigation any invalidity theory that could not have been raised in an
`inter partes review proceeding.
`
`Best regards,
`
`Larissa S. Bifano
`
`LSB:
`
`IPR2022-01227
`EXHIBIT 1027 - PAGE 0002
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket