throbber
Henry Houh - April 10, 2023
`
`Page 1
`
` UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
` BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`________________________________
` )
`THE WALT DISNEY COMPANY )
`DISNEY STREAMING SERVICES, )
`LLC, AND HULU LLC, )
` )
` PETITIONER, )
` ) IPR2022-01227
`V. ) PATENT 9,762,636 B2
` )
`WAG ACQUISITIONS, LLC, ) IPR2022-01228
` ) PATENT 9,742,824 B2
` PATENT OWNER. )
`________________________________)
`
` REMOTE DEPOSITION
` OF HENRY HOUH
` MONDAY, APRIL 10, 2023
`
` Reported By: Allison M. Hall, RDR, CRR, CSR
`
`GregoryEdwards, LLC | Worldwide Court Reporting
`GregoryEdwards.com | 866-4Team GE
`
`1
`
`2 3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`The Walt Disney Company et al. v. WAG Acquisition LLC - IPR2022-01227
`WAG Acquisition LLC
`Exhibit 2009 - Page 1 of 215
`
`

`

`Henry Houh - April 10, 2023
`
`Page 2
`
` April 10, 2023
`
` 10:02 a.m.
`
` Deposition of HENRY HOUH, held
`
` remotely via Zoom before Allison Hall, a
`
` Registered Diplomate Reporter, Registered
`
` Merit Reporter, Certified Realtime
`
` Reporter, Certified Shorthand Reporter
`
` and Notary Public.
`
`GregoryEdwards, LLC | Worldwide Court Reporting
`GregoryEdwards.com | 866-4Team GE
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`The Walt Disney Company et al. v. WAG Acquisition LLC - IPR2022-01227
`WAG Acquisition LLC
`Exhibit 2009 - Page 2 of 215
`
`

`

`Henry Houh - April 10, 2023
`
`Page 3
`
` A P P E A R A N C E S
`
` ON BEHALF OF PETITIONER:
`
` DLA PIPER LLP
` BY: LARISSA S. BIFANO, ESQUIRE
` THOMAS FULLER, ESQUIRE
` 33 Arch Street
` 26th Floor
` Boston, Massachusetts 02110
`
` ON BEHALF OF PATENT OWNER:
`
` LISTON ABRAMSON LLP
` BY: RONALD ABRAMSON, ESQUIRE
` M. MICHAEL LEWIS, ESQUIRE
` The Chrysler Building
` 405 Lexington Avenue
` 46th Floor
` New York, New York 10174
`
` ALSO PRESENT: Leo Hoarty
`
` * * * *
`
`1
`
`2 3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`GregoryEdwards, LLC | Worldwide Court Reporting
`GregoryEdwards.com | 866-4Team GE
`
`The Walt Disney Company et al. v. WAG Acquisition LLC - IPR2022-01227
`WAG Acquisition LLC
`Exhibit 2009 - Page 3 of 215
`
`

`

`Henry Houh - April 10, 2023
`
`Page 4
`
` I N D E X
`
` WITNESS PAGE
`
` HENRY HOUH
` Examination by Mr. Abramson 5
`
` * * * *
`
` E X H I B I T S
`
` NUMBER DESCRIPTION MARKED
` Exhibit Houh Declaration '636 6
` 1002 (1227) patent
` Exhibit Houh Declaration '824 6
` 1002 (1228) patent
` Exhibit RFC 793 33
` 1018
` Exhibit TCP/IP Illustrated, 34
` 1019 Volume 1, The Protocols
` W. Richard Stevens
` Exhibit U.S. Patent 6,389,473 52
` 1004 Carmel et al.
` Exhibit RFC 1945 102
` 2002
` Exhibit RFC 2068 107
` 2004
` Exhibit Houh Declaration '594 196
` 2003 patent
`
` * * * *
`
`GregoryEdwards, LLC | Worldwide Court Reporting
`GregoryEdwards.com | 866-4Team GE
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4 5
`
`6 7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`The Walt Disney Company et al. v. WAG Acquisition LLC - IPR2022-01227
`WAG Acquisition LLC
`Exhibit 2009 - Page 4 of 215
`
`

`

`Henry Houh - April 10, 2023
`
`Page 5
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
` HENRY HOUH,
`
` having first been duly sworn,
`
` testified as follows: 10:02
`
` EXAMINATION 10:02
`
` BY MR. ABRAMSON: 10:02
`
` Q. Good morning, Mr. Houh. 10:02
`
` A. Good morning. 10:02
`
` Q. According to your CV, you've 10:02
`
` appeared in many cases as an expert; is that 10:02
`
` correct? 10:02
`
` A. Your audio broke up, but I 10:02
`
` think -- I think the answer is yes. 10:02
`
` Q. Well, let me see. Actually, let's 10:02
`
` see, we have a realtime here. Okay. Good. 10:02
`
` And those appearances include 10:02
`
` appearing as an expert in PTAB cases, 10:02
`
` correct? 10:02
`
` A. Yes. 10:02
`
` Q. And giving depositions in PTAB 10:02
`
` cases, correct? 10:02
`
` A. Yes. 10:02
`
` Q. So is it fair to say that you're 10:02
`
` well aware of how the deposition process 10:03
`
` works in an IPR? 10:03
`
` A. Generally, I think. 10:03
`
`GregoryEdwards, LLC | Worldwide Court Reporting
`GregoryEdwards.com | 866-4Team GE
`
`The Walt Disney Company et al. v. WAG Acquisition LLC - IPR2022-01227
`WAG Acquisition LLC
`Exhibit 2009 - Page 5 of 215
`
`

`

`Henry Houh - April 10, 2023
`
`Page 6
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
` Q. We -- do we need to review it? 10:03
`
` A. I'm okay. 10:03
`
` Q. Good. I'd like to refer to your 10:03
`
` declaration. And just for you and for the 10:03
`
` record, I think we all know that there are 10:03
`
` two IPRs that were instituted here, IPR 10:03
`
` 2022-01227 and 1228. 10:03
`
` And you've got a declaration in 10:03
`
` each one that's got the Number Exhibit 1002. 10:03
`
` (THEREUPON, Exhibit 1002 (1227) was 10:03
`
` marked for identification.) 10:03
`
` (THEREUPON, Exhibit 1002 (1228) was 10:03
`
` marked for identification.) 10:03
`
` MR. ABRAMSON: So I just want to 10:03
`
` say for the record that I'm going to 10:03
`
` start off by looking at Exhibit 1002 in 10:04
`
` the 1227 case. That's the one concerning 10:04
`
` the '636 patent. 10:04
`
` But for the most part, unless I 10:04
`
` specify otherwise, when I ask about your 10:04
`
` declaration or Exhibit 1002, I'll 10:04
`
` actually be referring to the one in 1228. 10:04
`
` Is -- are you clear on that? 10:04
`
` THE WITNESS: Yeah, that sounds 10:04
`
` good. I have printed copies of -- of 10:04
`
`GregoryEdwards, LLC | Worldwide Court Reporting
`GregoryEdwards.com | 866-4Team GE
`
`The Walt Disney Company et al. v. WAG Acquisition LLC - IPR2022-01227
`WAG Acquisition LLC
`Exhibit 2009 - Page 6 of 215
`
`

`

`Henry Houh - April 10, 2023
`
`Page 7
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
` some of the documents from those matters 10:04
`
` here. 10:04
`
` MS. BIFANO: Mr. Abramson, are you 10:04
`
` planning on designating this deposition 10:04
`
` testimony for both proceedings? 10:04
`
` MR. ABRAMSON: Yes. 10:04
`
` MS. BIFANO: Okay. And then are 10:04
`
` you going to -- so then you won't go 10:04
`
` through the background twice, we'll do 10:04
`
` that once, and then you'll handle one 10:04
`
` proceeding and then you'll let us know 10:04
`
` when you're moving to the other 10:04
`
` proceeding, anything that's specific for 10:04
`
` the second proceeding? 10:04
`
` MR. ABRAMSON: No. I think the 10:05
`
` subject matter overlaps considerably and 10:05
`
` I think my questions -- most of my 10:05
`
` questions will actually relate to both 10:05
`
` proceedings. 10:05
`
` So I view this as just an 10:05
`
` examination that I'm going to -- I'd be 10:05
`
` able to use in either -- either one of 10:05
`
` the IPRs. 10:05
`
` MS. BIFANO: Okay. And then, I'm 10:05
`
` sorry, which one did you -- are we -- 10:05
`
`GregoryEdwards, LLC | Worldwide Court Reporting
`GregoryEdwards.com | 866-4Team GE
`
`The Walt Disney Company et al. v. WAG Acquisition LLC - IPR2022-01227
`WAG Acquisition LLC
`Exhibit 2009 - Page 7 of 215
`
`

`

`Henry Houh - April 10, 2023
`
`Page 8
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
` you're going to refer to exhibits in 10:05
`
` the -- which one? In the 1228 or the... 10:05
`
` MR. ABRAMSON: Yeah, most -- most 10:05
`
` of the exhibits are identical. 10:05
`
` MS. BIFANO: Yes. 10:05
`
` MR. ABRAMSON: Most of the 10:05
`
` exhibits are identical -- 10:05
`
` MS. BIFANO: I just wondered. 10:05
`
` MR. ABRAMSON: -- between the two 10:05
`
` proceedings. Exhibit 1002 is somewhat 10:05
`
` different in the two proceedings. 10:05
`
` So what I'm saying is I will -- I 10:05
`
` will indicate which of those two Exhibit 10:05
`
` 1002s I'm referring to in my question. 10:05
`
` And if I don't, the assumption should be 10:05
`
` that I'm referring to the one in the 1228 10:06
`
` proceeding. 10:06
`
` MS. BIFANO: Okay. Thank you. 10:06
`
` MR. ABRAMSON: Okay. 10:06
`
` Q. (By Mr. Abramson) Are you clear 10:06
`
` on that, Mr. Houh? 10:06
`
` A. Yes, that sounds good. 10:06
`
` Q. Excuse me. Dr. Houh. 10:06
`
` So let's refer to -- let's go into 10:06
`
` the Exhibit 1002 for the 1227 case. And I 10:06
`
`GregoryEdwards, LLC | Worldwide Court Reporting
`GregoryEdwards.com | 866-4Team GE
`
`The Walt Disney Company et al. v. WAG Acquisition LLC - IPR2022-01227
`WAG Acquisition LLC
`Exhibit 2009 - Page 8 of 215
`
`

`

`Henry Houh - April 10, 2023
`
`Page 9
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
` will share the screen so we can see it on 10:06
`
` the screen if nowhere else. 10:06
`
` Do you see the screen okay? 10:06
`
` A. Yes. Only part of the document 10:06
`
` though. Are you planning to share this -- 10:06
`
` the electronic document or are you only 10:06
`
` going to do it by sharing your screen? 10:06
`
` Q. I'm not sure I understand what 10:06
`
` you're asking me. I'm sharing the exhibit 10:06
`
` on the screen. I was told you have a copy 10:07
`
` there yourself. 10:07
`
` A. I have a printed copy, yes. 10:07
`
` But -- yeah -- 10:07
`
` Q. Okay. 10:07
`
` A. -- I mean... 10:07
`
` Q. So you're clear that I'm 10:07
`
` referring -- which document I'm referring 10:07
`
` to? 10:07
`
` A. Yes, but sometimes the screen is 10:07
`
` so small it's hard to see the context of 10:07
`
` certain things you're showing. 10:07
`
` MS. BIFANO: Dr. Houh, I think you 10:07
`
` can just refer to your paper copy and 10:07
`
` then Mr. Abramson will -- will have this 10:07
`
` up but you can feel free to reference the 10:07
`
`GregoryEdwards, LLC | Worldwide Court Reporting
`GregoryEdwards.com | 866-4Team GE
`
`The Walt Disney Company et al. v. WAG Acquisition LLC - IPR2022-01227
`WAG Acquisition LLC
`Exhibit 2009 - Page 9 of 215
`
`

`

`Henry Houh - April 10, 2023
`
`Page 10
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
` paper copy. 10:07
`
` Assuming that's okay with you, Mr. 10:07
`
` Abramson? 10:07
`
` MR. ABRAMSON: It sure is. 10:07
`
` MS. BIFANO: Great. 10:07
`
` Does that make sense, Henry? 10:07
`
` THE WITNESS: Yes. 10:07
`
` MS. BIFANO: Great. 10:07
`
` Q. (By Mr. Abramson) Okay. So let's 10:07
`
` flip down to paragraph 12 of your 10:07
`
` declaration. 10:07
`
` A. Okay. 10:07
`
` Q. You do recognize this as your 10:08
`
` declaration which you signed, correct? 10:08
`
` A. I mean, I recognize my copy, but 10:08
`
` I -- I -- it's -- I -- you know, I don't 10:08
`
` see, for example, my -- I'm flipping to the 10:08
`
` signature page on mine, but I don't see -- 10:08
`
` Q. Well, I think -- 10:08
`
` A. -- it to match. 10:08
`
` Q. -- you'll have to back off -- back 10:08
`
` up because you attached -- you attached your 10:08
`
` CV to this and you have to go backwards from 10:08
`
` the end about 12 pages -- 13 pages and 10:08
`
` you'll see your -- you'll see your 10:08
`
`GregoryEdwards, LLC | Worldwide Court Reporting
`GregoryEdwards.com | 866-4Team GE
`
`The Walt Disney Company et al. v. WAG Acquisition LLC - IPR2022-01227
`WAG Acquisition LLC
`Exhibit 2009 - Page 10 of 215
`
`

`

`Henry Houh - April 10, 2023
`
`Page 11
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
` signature. 10:08
`
` A. Yeah, I mean, I see it on your 10:08
`
` copy now, but I -- I saw it on my copy, it's 10:08
`
` just that, you know, I -- I assume that's 10:08
`
` the as filed version. I have what is an as 10:08
`
` filed version of my declaration here as 10:08
`
` well -- 10:08
`
` Q. Yes. 10:09
`
` A. -- printed. 10:09
`
` Q. And it is. It is your as filed 10:09
`
` version. Absolutely. 10:09
`
` So referring to paragraph 12, 10:09
`
` which is on page 7 -- and I have it on the 10:09
`
` screen. 10:09
`
` A. Yeah, I see it. 10:09
`
` Q. Okay. And it -- do you see where 10:09
`
` it says that I have also participated in 10:09
`
` various Internet engineering task force 10:09
`
` working groups and attended IETF meetings in 10:09
`
` the mid- to late 1990s? 10:09
`
` Do you see that? 10:09
`
` A. Yes. 10:09
`
` Q. Okay. So what is the Internet 10:09
`
` Engineering Task Force? 10:09
`
` A. The Internet Engineering Task 10:09
`
`GregoryEdwards, LLC | Worldwide Court Reporting
`GregoryEdwards.com | 866-4Team GE
`
`The Walt Disney Company et al. v. WAG Acquisition LLC - IPR2022-01227
`WAG Acquisition LLC
`Exhibit 2009 - Page 11 of 215
`
`

`

`Henry Houh - April 10, 2023
`
`Page 12
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
` Force is a group of -- of people that are -- 10:09
`
` are -- that work on issues related to the 10:10
`
` Internet and they often issue things like 10:10
`
` requests for comments which then become 10:10
`
` Internet standards. 10:10
`
` For example, the Internet protocol 10:10
`
` draft, the realtime protocol draft, the 10:10
`
` transmission control protocol, RFCs have 10:10
`
` become requests for comments officially 10:10
`
` issued by parts of the Internet Engineering 10:10
`
` Task Force; different working groups will 10:10
`
` issue those. 10:10
`
` And then there's a public comment 10:10
`
` period and then they can be adopted as 10:10
`
` standards. So they have done a lot of work 10:10
`
` on a lot of issues related to the Internet, 10:10
`
` studying, you know, various protocols that 10:10
`
` can be used, for example, for media 10:10
`
` streaming and whatnot. 10:10
`
` Q. Okay. Referring, again, to 10:11
`
` paragraph 12, it says -- where it says you 10:11
`
` also participated in various IETF working 10:11
`
` groups, do you recall what working groups 10:11
`
` that you actually participated in? 10:11
`
` A. I don't remember all the names 10:11
`
`GregoryEdwards, LLC | Worldwide Court Reporting
`GregoryEdwards.com | 866-4Team GE
`
`The Walt Disney Company et al. v. WAG Acquisition LLC - IPR2022-01227
`WAG Acquisition LLC
`Exhibit 2009 - Page 12 of 215
`
`

`

`Henry Houh - April 10, 2023
`
`Page 13
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
` now. It's been some time. But I believe 10:11
`
` there is one group called MMUSIC, 10:11
`
` M-M-U-S-I-C, and I think that's a clever 10:11
`
` acronym for something that's -- that's 10:11
`
` basically -- they were working on multimedia 10:11
`
` streaming. 10:11
`
` There were a number of other 10:11
`
` groups that were related to -- to that that 10:11
`
` I was participating in and that would be, 10:11
`
` you know, via, you know, reading and, you 10:11
`
` know, replying in e-mail lists, for example. 10:11
`
` That's how a lot of the working 10:11
`
` groups do their work is over -- was over 10:11
`
` e-mail. And then they also have meetings -- 10:11
`
` in-person meetings at sessions at the 10:11
`
` Internet Engineering Task Force meetings. 10:12
`
` Q. Okay. And did you go to any of 10:12
`
` those? 10:12
`
` A. I did. I don't remember how many 10:12
`
` or where. I believe there was one in 10:12
`
` Minneapolis that I went to. There were, I 10:12
`
` think, a few more, but I don't remember all 10:12
`
` of them now. 10:12
`
` Q. Okay. Paragraph 13 refers to your 10:12
`
` being an undergraduate at MIT. 10:12
`
`GregoryEdwards, LLC | Worldwide Court Reporting
`GregoryEdwards.com | 866-4Team GE
`
`The Walt Disney Company et al. v. WAG Acquisition LLC - IPR2022-01227
`WAG Acquisition LLC
`Exhibit 2009 - Page 13 of 215
`
`

`

`Henry Houh - April 10, 2023
`
`Page 14
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
` Do you see that? 10:12
`
` A. Yes. 10:12
`
` Q. And you went on -- you did your -- 10:12
`
` you did your graduate studies at MIT as 10:12
`
` well? 10:12
`
` A. I did, yes. 10:12
`
` Q. So were you regularly around MIT 10:12
`
` until 1998? 10:12
`
` A. Yes, generally. 10:12
`
` Q. Okay. Do you know a person named 10:12
`
` Jim Gettys? 10:13
`
` A. Yes, the name sounds familiar. 10:13
`
` Q. Do you know -- well, who -- what's 10:13
`
` your understanding of what Mr. -- why you 10:13
`
` might have known Mr. Gettys? 10:13
`
` A. Well, you know, it's the first 10:13
`
` time I've heard that name in years, but I 10:13
`
` believe -- I'm -- I remember his name. He, 10:13
`
` I think, was involved with MIT at some 10:13
`
` point. I seem to recall that he worked for 10:13
`
` Digital Equipment Corporation. 10:13
`
` I'm not sure if that's actually 10:13
`
` true. That's just what popped to my mind 10:13
`
` just now. And I think he was active in kind 10:13
`
` of Internet issues as well. 10:13
`
`GregoryEdwards, LLC | Worldwide Court Reporting
`GregoryEdwards.com | 866-4Team GE
`
`The Walt Disney Company et al. v. WAG Acquisition LLC - IPR2022-01227
`WAG Acquisition LLC
`Exhibit 2009 - Page 14 of 215
`
`

`

`Henry Houh - April 10, 2023
`
`Page 15
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
` Q. Do you remember which Internet 10:13
`
` issues? 10:13
`
` A. I don't. It's been so long. 10:13
`
` Q. Did you work with him? 10:13
`
` A. No, I don't think I worked with 10:13
`
` him. I -- I mean, it's possible that -- 10:13
`
` that he collaborated with various members of 10:13
`
` the group or people that I knew working in 10:13
`
` both my group and closely related groups but 10:14
`
` I just don't recall for sure. 10:14
`
` I mean, his name has come up 10:14
`
` before in some things. I just can't 10:14
`
` remember exactly what. 10:14
`
` Q. Do you know anybody by the name of 10:14
`
` Roy Fielding? 10:14
`
` A. Roy? I -- you know, that name 10:14
`
` sounds vaguely familiar but less familiar 10:14
`
` than Jim Gettys' name, so I don't know. I 10:14
`
` don't know one way or the other. I just 10:14
`
` can't remember. 10:14
`
` Q. Okay. Turning back to the Exhibit 10:14
`
` 1002 from the 1227 IPR, I'd like to flip to 10:14
`
` the end where you attached your CV, which 10:14
`
` would be the -- about a dozen pages from the 10:15
`
` end. 10:15
`
`GregoryEdwards, LLC | Worldwide Court Reporting
`GregoryEdwards.com | 866-4Team GE
`
`The Walt Disney Company et al. v. WAG Acquisition LLC - IPR2022-01227
`WAG Acquisition LLC
`Exhibit 2009 - Page 15 of 215
`
`

`

`Henry Houh - April 10, 2023
`
`Page 16
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
` It says Appendix A and then it -- 10:15
`
` and it has your CV. 10:15
`
` Do you see that? 10:15
`
` A. I -- I do. 10:15
`
` Q. Okay. Was this CV up-to-date at 10:15
`
` the time this IPR was filed in July of 2022? 10:15
`
` A. You know, I expect that it 10:15
`
` probably was close, but I -- I don't always 10:15
`
` include all of my cases in -- in my CV. I 10:15
`
` usually have separate submissions, for 10:15
`
` example, if I'm filing protective order 10:16
`
` documents where they require me to list 10:16
`
` every case in the past, you know, four or 10:16
`
` five years. 10:16
`
` But I generally, you know, do add 10:16
`
` cases to my CV occasionally. I try to do it 10:16
`
` as they occur, but I'm not always -- I'm not 10:16
`
` good with the CV. 10:16
`
` Q. Okay. 10:16
`
` A. But that really would be the 10:16
`
` only -- only thing I change usually. 10:16
`
` Q. Okay. So going to -- your CV 10:16
`
` itself has page numbers. 10:16
`
` Do you see that? 10:17
`
` A. Yes, I do. 10:17
`
`GregoryEdwards, LLC | Worldwide Court Reporting
`GregoryEdwards.com | 866-4Team GE
`
`The Walt Disney Company et al. v. WAG Acquisition LLC - IPR2022-01227
`WAG Acquisition LLC
`Exhibit 2009 - Page 16 of 215
`
`

`

`Henry Houh - April 10, 2023
`
`Page 17
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
` Q. So let's go down to -- yes, at the 10:17
`
` bottom of page 9, do you see a heading that 10:17
`
` says, "Publications"? 10:17
`
` A. Yes, I do. 10:17
`
` Q. And then there's a list. Do you 10:17
`
` see the list that begins on the following 10:17
`
` page -- 10:17
`
` A. Yes, I do. 10:17
`
` Q. -- and continues over on to page 10:17
`
` 11? 10:17
`
` A. Yes. 10:17
`
` Q. Is that list in reverse 10:17
`
` chronological order? 10:17
`
` A. I would say just taking a quick 10:17
`
` look, probably. I'm not sure if it's 10:17
`
` strictly in reverse chronological order but 10:17
`
` generally I think it is. 10:17
`
` Q. Okay. So is -- am I correct that 10:17
`
` this section doesn't list any publications 10:17
`
` after 1996? 10:18
`
` A. Yes, that's correct. I -- I -- 10:18
`
` that was the end of my -- getting towards 10:18
`
` the end of my academic career. 10:18
`
` Q. And after your academic career, 10:18
`
` you no longer published papers? 10:18
`
`GregoryEdwards, LLC | Worldwide Court Reporting
`GregoryEdwards.com | 866-4Team GE
`
`The Walt Disney Company et al. v. WAG Acquisition LLC - IPR2022-01227
`WAG Acquisition LLC
`Exhibit 2009 - Page 17 of 215
`
`

`

`Henry Houh - April 10, 2023
`
`Page 18
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
` A. I no longer publish academic 10:18
`
` papers. I think I submitted an Internet 10:18
`
` draft to the IETF when I was working at a 10:18
`
` company later. 10:18
`
` Q. Right. Let me jump ahead. 10:18
`
` Okay. So you mentioned an 10:19
`
` Internet draft. Let's start with -- with 10:19
`
` RFCs. 10:19
`
` Is it correct that you are not 10:20
`
` listed as an author on any RFC? 10:20
`
` A. I think that's correct. 10:20
`
` Q. And is it also correct that you 10:20
`
` have no active Internet drafts at this time? 10:20
`
` A. I think that's correct too. 10:20
`
` Q. And the Internet draft that you 10:20
`
` just referred to in your testimony, that was 10:20
`
` an expired draft? 10:20
`
` A. Yeah, I think they automatically 10:20
`
` expire after some amount of time -- 10:20
`
` Q. Okay. 10:20
`
` A. -- so, yes. Yes. 10:20
`
` Q. Was this a draft that concerned -- 10:20
`
` well, telephony DHCP? 10:20
`
` A. That sounds approximately correct. 10:20
`
` Q. And that's -- that's the Internet 10:20
`
`GregoryEdwards, LLC | Worldwide Court Reporting
`GregoryEdwards.com | 866-4Team GE
`
`The Walt Disney Company et al. v. WAG Acquisition LLC - IPR2022-01227
`WAG Acquisition LLC
`Exhibit 2009 - Page 18 of 215
`
`

`

`Henry Houh - April 10, 2023
`
`Page 19
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
` draft that you're referring to? 10:20
`
` A. I think so. That vaguely sounds 10:20
`
` correct. I -- you know, I'm not looking at 10:20
`
` a copy of it but apparently you found it. 10:20
`
` Q. Were there any others -- any other 10:20
`
` Internet drafts that you were involved in 10:20
`
` with your name on it? 10:21
`
` A. I don't recall any others. 10:21
`
` Q. And would it be -- would it be 10:21
`
` correct to say that that draft was last 10:21
`
` updated in 1999? 10:21
`
` A. That sounds about the time that 10:21
`
` I -- I submitted it, but, yes, I mean, they 10:21
`
` do expire after some amount of time. 10:21
`
` Q. Okay. So you -- there's a -- 10:21
`
` there's a heading in your CV called "Trials, 10:21
`
` Testimony and Depositions." 10:21
`
` Do you see that? 10:21
`
` A. I do. 10:21
`
` Q. And that goes on for over three 10:22
`
` pages, correct? 10:22
`
` A. Yes, that's -- that's right. 10:22
`
` Q. Okay. So in the course of these 10:22
`
` listed proceedings, you've had the 10:22
`
` opportunity to submit numerous expert 10:22
`
`GregoryEdwards, LLC | Worldwide Court Reporting
`GregoryEdwards.com | 866-4Team GE
`
`The Walt Disney Company et al. v. WAG Acquisition LLC - IPR2022-01227
`WAG Acquisition LLC
`Exhibit 2009 - Page 19 of 215
`
`

`

`Henry Houh - April 10, 2023
`
`Page 20
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
` reports and give numerous expert opinions, 10:22
`
` correct? 10:22
`
` A. Yeah, I'm sorry. The audio broke 10:22
`
` up. I'm not sure why, but this is the worse 10:22
`
` kind of connection maybe I have had for -- 10:22
`
` Q. Maybe you should -- maybe you 10:22
`
` should come -- maybe you should try to, you 10:22
`
` know, log out and log back in again. 10:22
`
` A. So when you say these proceedings, 10:24
`
` you're referring to the ones I'm being 10:24
`
` deposed on today? 10:24
`
` Q. Yes. 10:24
`
` A. Yeah, I would say not all of these 10:24
`
` listed here are during the course of these 10:24
`
` proceedings; that there were probably some 10:25
`
` and there were probably a number of them. I 10:25
`
` don't know how many. 10:25
`
` Q. Okay. But throughout this section 10:25
`
` it's referring to sub

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket