throbber
Case 6:20-cv-01215-ADA Document 80 Filed 04/27/22 Page 1 of 3
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`WACO DIVISION
`
`
`
`
`Ocean Semiconductor LLC,
`
`
`
`
`Plaintiff
`
`
`v.
`
`MediaTek Inc. and MediaTek USA Inc.,
`
`
`
`
`Defendants.
`
`
`
`Civil Action No.: 6:20-cv-1210-ADA
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`PATENT CASE
`
`
`Ocean Semiconductor LLC,
`
`
`
`
`Plaintiff
`
`
`v.
`
`NXP USA, Inc.
`
`
`
`
`
`Defendant.
`
`
`Ocean Semiconductor LLC,
`
`
`
`
`Plaintiff
`
`
`v.
`
`Silicon Laboratories Inc.,
`
`
`
`
`Defendant.
`
`
`Ocean Semiconductor LLC,
`
`
`
`
`Plaintiff
`
`
`v.
`
`STMicroelectronics, Inc.,
`
`
`
`
`Defendant.
`
`
`
`Civil Action No.: 6:20-cv-1212-ADA
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`PATENT CASE
`
`
`
`Civil Action No.: 6:20-cv-1214-ADA
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`PATENT CASE
`
`
`
`Civil Action No.: 6:20-cv-1215-ADA
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`PATENT CASE
`
`PDF Solutions v Ocean Semiconductor, IPR2022-01196
`PDF Exhibit 1004, Page 1 of 3
`
`

`

`Case 6:20-cv-01215-ADA Document 80 Filed 04/27/22 Page 2 of 3
`
`Ocean Semiconductor LLC,
`Plaintiff
`
`v.
`Western Digital Technologies, Inc.
`Defendant.
`
`Civil Action No.: 6:20-cv-1216-ADA
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`PATENT CASE
`
`ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’
`OPPOSED MOTION TO MODIFY SCHEDULING ORDER
`
`The Court, having considered the Opposed Motion to Modify Scheduling Order in the
`
`above-captioned cases, and all associated briefing, supporting documents, and evidence,
`
`HEREBY ORDERS that the Motion should be GRANTED.
`
`Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the following schedule will govern deadlines up to and
`
`including the trial of this matter:
`
`Item
`Deadline for the first of two meet and confers to discuss
`significantly narrowing the number of claims asserted and prior
`art references at issue.
`Close of Fact Discovery.
`Opening Expert Reports.
`Rebuttal Expert Reports.
`Close of Expert Discovery.
`Deadline for the second of two meet and confers to discuss
`narrowing the number of claims asserted and prior art references
`at issue to triable limits.
`Dispositive motion deadline and Daubert motion deadline.
`Serve Pretrial Disclosures
`Serve objections to pretrial disclosures/rebuttal disclosures.
`Serve objections to rebuttal disclosures and File Motions in
`limine.
`File Joint Pretrial Order and Pretrial Submissions; file oppositions
`to motions in limine
`
`Deadline
`September 7, 2022
`
`October 5, 2022
`October 12, 2022
`November 9, 2022
`November 30, 2022
`December 7, 2022
`
`December 14, 2022
`January 11, 2023
`January 25, 2023
`February 1, 2023
`
`February 8, 2023
`
`PDF Solutions v Ocean Semiconductor, IPR2022-01196
`PDF Exhibit 1004, Page 2 of 3
`
`

`

`Case 6:20-cv-01215-ADA Document 80 Filed 04/27/22 Page 3 of 3
`
`Item
`File Notice of Request for Daily Transcript or Real Time
`Reporting.
`
`Deadline
`February 15, 2023
`
`Deadline to meet and confer regarding remaining objections and
`disputes on motions in limine.
`File joint notice identifying remaining objections to pretrial
`disclosures and disputes on motions in limine.
`Final Pretrial Conference.
`
`Jury Selection/Trial.
`
`February 24, 2023
`
`[Subject to the
`convenience of the
`Court’s schedule]
`[Subject to the
`convenience of the
`Court’s schedule]
`
`SIGNED this 27th day of April, 2022.
`
`Judge Alan D Albright
`
`PDF Solutions v Ocean Semiconductor, IPR2022-01196
`PDF Exhibit 1004, Page 3 of 3
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket