`Date: Wednesday, November 30, 2022 at 11:16:50 AM Eastern Standard Time
`From:
`Singh, Tej
`To:
`Lawrence Hadley, Jason Linger, Genevieve Vose Wallace, Max Tribble, Krisina Zuniga, Tom
`DelRosario, Kalpana Srinivasan, Dan Duhaime, cmcandrew@glaserweil.com
`Crowson, Celine J., Gambhir, NiEn, Stoll-DeBell, KirsEn L., Beyer, Carrie, Silverstein, Brianna L.,
`Brzezynski, Lora A., Kirsten Elfstrand, J. Stephen Ravel, Michael Jones, Shaun Hasse]
`
`CC:
`
`Counsel -
`
`Google and Microsoft have filed petitions for inter partes review against the three Hafeman patents
`asserted in this case and identified LG Electronics Inc. as a real party-in-interest.
`
`As you know, LG Electronics Inc. is the only defendant in Hafeman v. LG Electronics, Inc. (Case No.
`6:21-cv-00696-ADA-DTG), and the deadline to add parties was on June 8, 2022. In accordance with
`the Board’s precedential decision in Sotera Wireless, Inc. v. Masimo Corp., IPR2020-01019, Paper 12 at
`18-19 (PTAB Dec. 1, 2020), LG Electronics Inc. agrees that if any of IPR Nos. IPR2022-01188,
`IPR2022-01189, IPR2022-01190, IPR2022-01191, IPR2022-01192, and IPR2022-01193 is instituted,
`LG Electronics Inc. will not pursue in the related district court proceeding “any ground that [Google or
`Microsoft] raised or reasonably could have raised” during the instituted IPRs. 35 U.S.C. § 315(e).
`
`Best regards,
`Tej
`_______________________________________________________________________________
`Tej Singh | Counsel | Hogan Lovells US LLP | tej.singh@hoganlovells.com | + 1 650 463 4152
`
`EX-1029
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
