throbber
612
`
`Brief clinical and laboratory observations
`
`The Journal of Pediatrics
`April 1979
`
`Diagnosis and management of cardiac rhythm disorders
`by transtelephonic electrocardiography in infants and
`children
`
`Macdonald Dick Il, M.D.,* Dena McFadden, M.D., Dennis Crowley, M.D., and
`Amnon RoSentbal, M.D., Ann Arbor, Mich.
`
`TRANSTELEPHONIC ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHY was
`initially developed for outpatient monitoring of pace-
`maker performance in adult patients.'-5 Subsequent
`reports describe its use in the management of paroxysmal
`arrhythmias.4-5 There has been little experience, however,
`with these devices in the diagnosis and treatment of
`cardiac rhythm disturbances in infants and children.
`Alternative methods of diagnosis are often unsatisfactory.
`An outpatient standard electrocardiogram in unlikely to
`record an episodic event of short duration. Hotter moni-
`tors used to obtain a 12- or 24-hour electrocardiographic
`tape recording are heavy and cumbersome and may be
`damaged when given to a child. Hospitalization for
`constant ECG monitoring is disruptive of family life and
`expensive. For these reasons we have explored the use of
`transtelephonic electrocardiography in the diagnosis and
`management of disorders of cardiac rhythm in children.
`The purpose of this report is to summarize the indications,
`resultS, advantages, and limitations of transtelephoriic
`electrocardiography in the pediatric age group.
`
`MATERIALS AND METHODS
`
`The transtelephonic ECG system consists of a battery-
`powered portable
`transmitter (Cardiotrack 2112 or
`Instromedix 9404 Pacer-Tracer), one side of which rests
`during transmission against the patient's chest with the
`other adapted to fit an ordinary telephone receiver (Fig.
`1). The patient's electrocardiographic signal modulates a
`constant 1900 Hertz transmitter audible output which is
`conducted via the telephone to a receiver (Cardiotrack
`2100) fOr translation into an ECG tracing. Recordings are
`received by a technician or physician during the day, and
`by the staff of the Intensive Care Unit or tape recording
`device during the night or weekends.
`From December I, 1977, through May 31, 1978, 18
`children ranging in age from one month to 19 years,
`transmitted 125 transtelephonic ECG recordings. Indica-
`
`From the Section of Pediatric Cardiology, C. S. Mott
`Children's Hospital, and the Department of Pediatrics,
`University of Michigan.
`•Reprint address: Section of Pediatric Cardiology, F-I I I7A
`C. S. Mott Children's Hospital, University of Michigan, Ann
`Arbor, MI 48109.
`
`tions for transmission were classified into three groups
`(Table): Group I included six patients with undocti-
`mented or undiagnosed cardiac complaints; three of these
`patients presented with palpitations, syncope, or chest
`pain, and three with poorly documented tachyarrhyth-
`mias. Group II: Transtelephonic contacts in this group
`were used to guide decisions to initiate, maintain, alter, or
`discontinue therapy. Group III: The transtelephonic
`system was used to monitor beat to beat heart rate (RR
`interval) to detect early pacemaker failure.
`
`Abbreviation used
`electrocardiogram
`ECG:
`
`An "abnormal" tracing was defined as a newly recog-
`nized disturbance of rate of rhythm. An "intervention"
`was defined as any change in drug regimen or manage-
`ment resulting from a transtelephonic transmission. The
`relative weight, size, and cost of the transtelephonic
`electrocardiography system were compared to those of a
`Holter monitor. Distances from the patient's homes to the
`C. S. Mott Children's Hospital in Ann Arbor were
`estimated.'
`
`RESULTS
`
`The Table summarizes the results of 125 transmissions
`received from the 18 patients. Eighteen percent of these
`tracings were abnormal; intervention occurred following
`26% of the recordings. The number of interventions
`exceeded the number of abnormal tracings because in one
`patient stable tracings permitted withdrawal of drug
`therapy.
`Two of the six Group I patients produced abnormal
`tracings. A 12-year-old boy presented with complaints of
`episodic dizziness, syncope, and chest pain. Transtele-
`phonic ECG tracings showed frequent premature ventric-
`ular beats, with a bigeminal and trigeminal pattern.
`However, there was no temporal relationship between the
`ectopy and the symptoms of faintness or dizziness; no
`therapy was initiated. Another 12-year-old boy com-
`plained of frequent and severe palpitations; a transtele-
`
`0022-3476/79/400612 + 04$00.40/0 © 1979 The C. V. Mosby Co.
`
`ALIVECOR - EXHIBIT 2016
`Apple Inc. v. AliveCor, Inc. - IPR2022-01186
`
`

`

`Volume 94
`Number 4
`
`Brief clinical and laboratory observations
`
`613
`
`at e
`
`ca
`
`r-r•?.
`
`S-rfr,z7
`
`Fig. 1. A, Transmitting technique. The transmitter rests on the anterior chest wall and the microphone
`end of the telephone receiver is placed over it. B, Transtelephonic receiver. The telephone receiver is
`inserted into the cradle of the recorder, and the audible signal is converted into an electrocardiographic
`tracing.
`
`Table
`
`Patients
`
`Tracings
`
`Age
`range Total Abnormal
`(yr) (No.)
`(No.)
`
`No.
`
`Inter-
`yen-
`tions
`(No.)
`
`14
`
`2
`
`1
`
`97
`
`21
`
`32
`
`6 10 to
`13
`
`9
`
`1/12
`to 15
`
`I. Diagnosis
`4
`PSVT
`1
`VT
`1
`NSHD
`II. Drug management
`PSVT
`5
`2
`VT
`JT
`Ventricular
`bigeminy
`
`1
`
`III. Pacemaker
`Congenital CHB
`Surgical CHB
`
`I
`2
`
`3
`
`2/12
`to 19
`
`14
`
`0
`
`0
`
`Total
`
`18
`
`125
`
`23
`
`33
`
`Abbreviations used: CHB = Complete heart block: JT = junctional
`tachycardia; NSHD = no significant heart disease; PSVT = paroxysmal
`supraventricular tachycardia: VT = ventricular tachycardia.
`
`phonic tracing, obtained during a symptomatic episode,
`demonstrated paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia.
`Conversion to normal sinus rhythm was achieved with
`immersion of his face in cold water. Therapy with digoxin
`was begun, with a subsequent decrease in the frequency of
`paroxysmal episodes. The remaining three children with
`poorly documented arrhythmias have remained free of
`arrhythmias.
`Among the nine patients in Group II, premature atrial
`contractions were present in two tracings, premature
`
`• ..
`
`h.
`
`Fig. 2. These transtelephonic tracings illustrate paroxysmal
`supraventricular tachycardia in a 12-year-old boy. A. An abnor-
`mal broad QRS morphology. B, A few minutes later; the
`difference in QRS morphology, now more clearly indicating a
`supraventricular impulse, was obtained by changing the orienta-
`tion of the transmitter on the chest wall so that the lead system of
`the transmitter was more parallel to the QRS mean electrical
`axis.
`
`ventricular contractions in seven, and junctional tachycar-
`dia in one. During each of these observations there were
`no associated symptoms; thus no further control of the
`arrhythmias was considered necessary. Eleven tracings
`demonstrated supraventricular tachycardia; digoxin and/
`or propranolol dosage was increased with successful
`conversion to sinus rhythm in ten of these episodes. In one
`2-month-old infant, supraventricular tachycardia per-
`sisted for 36 hours despite increases in digoxin and
`propranolol, and hospitalization was advised. A 5-year-
`
`

`

`614
`
`Brief clinical and laboratory observations
`
`The Journal of Pediatrics
`April 1979
`
`old girl who had ventricular tachycardia associated with
`myocarditis was readmitted to the hospital when ventric-
`ular bigeminy returned while on propranolol therapy.
`No tracings requiring intervention were received from
`Group III (pacemaker) patients.
`Distance from the patient's home to the C. S. Mott
`Children's Hospital averaged 82 miles (range one to 450
`miles). The transmitter (Cardiotrack 2112) weighs five
`ounces and is eight cubic inches. Holter monitors vary in
`weight and size from 14 ounces, 22 cubic inches (Oxford
`Medilog) to 32 ounces, 50 cubic inches (ICR Dyna-Gram
`recorder). Another widely used Holter recorder is 26
`ounces, in weight and 43 cubic inches (Avionics Electro-
`cardiocorder MN 445). Purchase of the transmitter is
`borne by the institution, and charge to the patient or third
`party payer is initiated upon each transmission. After
`diagnosis or cessation of drug monitoring, the transmitter
`is returned. Pacemaker patients purchase ($100 to $200)
`and receive the transmitter at the time of pacemaker
`implantation. Comparison of relative cost at our institu-
`tion disclosed that one transtelephonic electrocardiogram
`cost approximately 75% of that of a 12-lead diagnostic
`electrocardiogram and 10% of that of a 24-hour Holter
`monitor or one day hospitalization. No complications
`related to the use of this technique occurred during the
`period of study.
`
`DISCUSSION
`Transtelephonic electrocardiography is a safe, useful,
`and economic procedure in the management of pediatric
`patients with disturbances of cardiac rhythm. In the six
`patients with cardiac symptoms, arrhythmias were identi-
`fied in two and a temporal relationship between symp-
`toms and cardiac rhythm established in one of these. In
`the nine patients monitored for drug management, inter-
`ventions were made in five patients; the remaining four
`had stable rhythms requiring no change. In the three
`children requiring pacemaker implantation, we anticipate
`that the system will detect early pacemaker failure, as it
`does in adults.'-3
`The use of this device permits rapid, accurate assess-
`ment of a symptom suggestive of a cardiac dysrhythmia.
`In the past, these patients would have to rush to an
`emergency room or physician's office to obtain an ECG,
`or receive a 24-hour Holter monitor. Holter monitoring,
`especially if done as an inpatient, is very expensive. The
`equipment is bulky, heavy, and subject to breakage,
`especially by the young child. The recording electrodes
`must be attached to the body surface, and the recorder
`carried from the shoulder or waist. Finally, Hotter moni-
`toring does not provide an instantaneously available
`method of correlating symptoms and cardiac rhythm. In
`
`the patients with implanted pacemakers, beat-to-beat
`analysis of pacemaker rate provides precise monitoring of
`pacemaker output, and diminishes the need for pulse
`checking. Symptoms suspected of pacemaker malfunction
`can be evaluated without travel to a medical facility. The
`management of recurrent or chronic arrhythmias requir-
`ing drug therapy can be achieved as an outpatient.
`Changes in drug regimen can be accomplished and
`monitored efficiently and effectively. The need for office
`visit or hospitalization for serum drug levels or other
`studies can be based on data obtained via the transtele-
`phonic ECG.
`The disadvantages of transtelephonic monitoring are
`few. Most commercially available systems transmit one
`lead; with the proper equipment one can obtain a 12-lead
`diagnostic electrocardiogram, increasing the likelihood of
`detecting obscure P waves and ST-T wave changes. The
`potential for artifacts was thought to be great, but, in fact,
`reliable recordings were obtained from all patients. Arti-
`facts from lead placement can be corrected by asking the
`patient to change the orientation of the transmitter on his
`chest so that the lead system is parallel to the P wave and
`QRS mean electrical axis (Fig. 2). The signal generated is
`recorded only as long as the transmitter is placed upon the
`chest wall; thus recording's of prolonged time periods (12
`to 36 hours as with Holter tapes) surveying the cardiac
`rhythm for very transient (single ectopic beats) events or
`asymptomatic alterations cannot be obtained by this
`method. At this time most transmissions are made during
`working hours; however, signals can be recorded on
`standard phone answering-recording devices and played
`back the next morning for analysis. Alternatively, a
`receiver may be placed in an area where there is a
`constantly manned telephone, such as in an intensive care
`unit.
`The transtelephonic system offers several intangible
`benefits for all patients. The instrument is lightweight and
`portable, so it can be carried to school and away from
`home during a family vacation. It can be returned by mail
`to the medical facility when no longer needed. It is simple
`and convenient to use, so a young patient can initiate the
`call. Outpatient management decreases travel time, incon-
`venience, and expense. Ready access to professional
`personnel relieves patient and family anxiety, allowing
`accurate observation of worrisome symptoms and provid-
`ing reassurance that medical care is available.
`
`ADDENDUM
`Since preparation of this manuscript 16 additional
`transmitters,
`transtelephonic
`received
`patients have
`initiating an additional 57 transmissions. Seven of these
`patients had permanent implanted pacemakers. One 18-
`
`

`

`Volume 94
`Number 4
`
`Brief clinical and laboratory observations
`
`615
`
`month-old boy with syncopal episodes was shown to have
`a prolonged QT interval and transient ventricular fibrilla-
`tion; further evaluation demonstrated the prolonged QT
`sydrome with congenital deafness. Propranolol was
`administered with virtual elimination of syncope (one
`undocumented 1- to 2-second episode without loss of
`consciousness occurred while on therapy).
`
`REFERENCES
`1. Furman S, Parkcr B, and Escher DJW: Transtelphone
`pacemaker clinic, J Thor Cardiovasc Surg 61:827, 1971.
`2. Furman S, and Escher DJW: Transtelephonic pacemaker
`monitoring: Five years later, Ann Thorac Surg 20:326,
`1975.
`
`3. Starr A, Dobbs J, Dabolt L, and Pierie W: Ventricular
`tracing pacemaker and teletransmitter follow-up system,
`Am J Card 32:956, 1973.
`4. Hasin Y, David D, and Rogel S: Diagnostic and therapeutic
`assessment by telephone electrocardiographic monitoring of
`ambulatory patients, Br Med J 2:609, 1976.
`5. Scheidt S. McGill J, Wilner G, and Killip T: Remote
`electrocardiography clinical experience with telephone
`transmission of electrocardiograms, JAMA 230:1293,
`1974.
`6. Williams RL: Use of transtelephonic electrocardiography in
`patients with symptoms suggesting cardiac arrhythmias,
`Pediatrics 61:493, 1978.
`7. Crippled Children's Representative Manual, Bureau of
`Personal Health Services, Regional Offices, Michigan De-
`partment of Public Health, Appendix, Exhibit 2, 1976, p 4.
`
`Premature ventricular contractions as the presenting
`feature of mitral valve prolapse in childhood
`
`Arthur S. Pickoff, M.D., Henry, Gelband, M.D., Pedro Ferrer, M.D., Otto Garcia, M.D., and
`Dolores Tamer, M.D.,• Miami, Fla.
`
`ALTHOUGH the association of various cardiac arrhyth-
`mias and mitral valve prolapse is well described in the
`adult literature,'• 2 little is known about this association in
`childhood. Most reports of children with arrhythmias and
`MVP have described patients with the typical auscultatory
`findings of MVP, specifically, nonejection systolic clicks
`or late systolic murmurs or both.2
`Although echocardiographic surveys have demon-
`strated findings of MVP in up to 6% of "normal" young
`women,' there is no doubt that there exists a definite
`population with the same echocardiographic findings who
`experience, in varying degrees of severity, symptoms that
`have been described frequently in the context of the MVP
`syndrome. These symptoms include chest pain, dizziness,
`palpitations, episodes of syncope, and, in a small number
`of cases, sudden death." Cardiac arrhythmias, which can
`be associated with MVP, may play a role in the genesis of
`some of these symptoms.'
`Over the past four years we have included an echocar-
`diogram as part of the evaluation of any child presenting
`with ventricular arrhythmias of undetermined etiology.
`During this time, we have examined 51 patients and
`encountered six patients with echocardiographic evidence
`of MVP.
`
`From the Division of Pediatric Cardiology, the
`Department of Pediatrics, University of Miami School
`of Medicine.
`•Reprint address: Pediatric Cardiology, Department of
`Pediatrics, P.O. Box 016820, Miami, FL 33101.
`
`0022-3476/79/400615 + 03$00.30/0 c9 1979 The C. V. Mosby Co.
`
`MATERIALS AND METHODS
`
`All patients were referred for cardiac evaluation of
`ventricular arrhythmias of unknown etiology. A multipo-
`sitional auscultatory examination of the heart was
`performed in all. The diagnosis of the arrhythmia was
`made by standard electrocardiographic criteria in all
`patients. The diagnosis of MVP in six patients was made
`according to previously published echocardiographics or
`angiocardiographic criteria.° Five of six patients had
`exercise stress testing using a treadmill and following the
`Bruce protocol for graded exercise. Three of the patients
`had 24-hour electrocardiographic Holter monitoring.
`
`Abbreviations used
`MVP: mitral valve prolapse
`ECG:
`electrocardiogram
`PVC:
`premature ventricular contraction
`
`RESULTS
`
`The group consists of five girls and one boy ages 6 to 16
`years (Table). Symptoms included nonspecific chest pain
`in three patients, fatigability in one, and palpitations in
`two patients; "dizzy spells" were encountered in one
`patient, and near or actual syncope in two patients. Only
`one patient (Patient 3) could be considered totally asymp-
`tomatic from the cardiovascular point of view.
`The family history revealed a sibling with documented
`MVP in one patient (Patient 51: in Patient 2 there was an
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket