throbber
12/30/21, 2:53 PM
`
`Roku's Trial Delay Request OK'd By 'Surprised' Texas Judge - Law360
`
`Fish & Richa...
`News, cases, companies, firm
`
`Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
`
`Fish & Richardson
`My Account
`Emails & Alerts
`Newsletter Signup
`
`Close
`
`News, cases, companies, firm
`Search
`
`Search Law360
`Search News Only
`Search Cases Only
`Search PTAB Only
`Search TTAB Only
`
`Advanced Search
`
`Law360
`Law360 UK
`Law360 Pulse
`Law360 Employment Authority
`Law360 Tax Authority
`Law360 Insurance Authority
`
`Products
`Lexis®
`Law360 In-Depth
`Law360 Updates
`Law360 Podcasts
`
`Rankings
`Regional Powerhouses
`Law360's MVPs
`Glass Ceiling Report
`Law360 400
`Diversity Snapshot
`Practice Groups of the Year
`Rising Stars
`Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
`
`Sections
`Adv. Search & Platform Tools
`Browse all sections
`Banking
`Bankruptcy
`Class Action
`Competition
`Employment
`Energy
`Expert Analysis
`Insurance
`Intellectual Property
`Product Liability
`Securities
`
`Beta Tools
`Track docs
`
`https://www.law360.com/articles/1299933
`
`1/7
`
`1
`
`APPLE ET AL. 1025
`
`

`

`Roku's Trial Delay Request OK'd By 'Surprised' Texas Judge - Law360
`
`12/30/21, 2:53 PM
`Track attorneys
`Track judges
`
`Site Menu
`Join the Law360 team
`Search legal jobs
`Learn more about Law360
`Read testimonials
`Contact Law360
`Sign up for our newsletters
`Site Map
`Help
`
`Intellectual Property Securities Bankruptcy Competition Employment White Collar Legal Industry Access To
`Justice Law360 UK Pulse || See all sections
`
`Which firms made the Law360 Pulse Prestige Leaders list?
`Click here to find out.
`
`Roku's Trial Delay Request OK'd By
`'Surprised' Texas Judge
`
`By Daniel Siegal
`
`Share us on: By Daniel Siegal
`
`Law360 (August 10, 2020, 10:19 PM EDT) -- U.S. District Judge Alan D. Albright on Monday again delayed a
`patent jury trial involving Roku because of the coronavirus pandemic, noting his surprise this time that Roku's
`attorneys had asked for the case to start in October because of persistent safety concerns.
`
`The jury trial in the Western District of Texas — where MV3 Partners LLC is accusing Roku of infringing its
`streaming media patent — has already been delayed multiple times. The trial was set to start on June 1, June 29,
`Aug. 3 or 10, and most recently Sept. 3 or 4, but each time Judge Albright pushed it off due to the pandemic.
`
`During Monday's phone conference, Judge Albright agreed to scrap the September start date and find a new one
`for the future, possibly in October, according to minutes of the conference in the court docket.
`
`"The court announced that the trial may go forward in September. The defendant voiced that due to the current
`pandemic and the numbers associated with it in Waco, that their clients feel it would be possibly unsafe for their
`health and they would like the trial to be moved further out — possibly October," the minute entry said. "The
`court was surprised as he thought everyone was on board with moving forward in September."
`
`In a three-page letter filed with the court on Sunday, Roku told Judge Albright that it had serious concerns about
`having a jury trial in the Waco region right now. The company expressed special concern that the trial is not just
`a local matter, but one that brings in attorneys from both the west and east coasts who will have to meet
`frequently in person to prepare for trial.
`
`"As a result, and irrespective of each team member's possible exposure due to his or her travel, lodging, and
`living circumstances, each team member's chances of exposure will be increased since the other team members
`https://www.law360.com/articles/1299933
`
`2/7
`
`2
`
`

`

`Roku's Trial Delay Request OK'd By 'Surprised' Texas Judge - Law360
`12/30/21, 2:53 PM
`will have experienced their own travel, lodging, and living circumstances," Roku's letter said.
`
`Roku added that it has team members who are at an "enhanced risk" due to underlying health conditions, and
`that it should not be forced to conduct the trial without these people.
`
`Monday's scheduling decision also comes after Western District of Texas Chief Judge Orlando Garcia on
`Thursday again delayed the resumption of in-person trials in his district. He ordered that all civil and criminal
`bench and jury trials through Sept. 30 be continued.
`
`Roku's letter quoted Judge Garcia's order in noting that there have been thousands of confirmed cases of
`coronavirus in the Western District of Texas, and the order "makes it clear that jury trials should not be held if
`they would 'compromise the health and safety of court personnel, litigants, counsel, law enforcement, witnesses,
`and jurors.'"
`
`Judge Albright's law clerk Austin Schnell told Law360 on Monday that Judge Garcia's order "allows for
`individual divisions to hold jury trials if the most senior district judge in that division determines they may be
`held safely," and that Judge Albright is prepared to hold trials in September.
`
`MV3 sued in October 2018, alleging Roku TVs and some of the company's media players — the Roku
`Streaming Stick, Roku Ultra and Roku Express — infringe its patent on a system that streams media content
`from a mobile phone to larger displays such as televisions.
`
`Attorneys for the parties also did not immediately respond to requests for comment on Monday.
`
`The patent-in-suit is U.S. Patent No. 8,863,223.
`
`MV3 is represented by Jonathan K. Waldrop, Darcy L. Jones, Marcus A. Barber, John W. Downing, Heather S.
`Kim, Jack Shaw, ThucMinh Nguyen and Paul G. Williams of Kasowitz Benson Torres LLP, J. Mark Mann, G.
`Blake Thompson and Andy Tindel of Mann Tindel & Thompson, and Craig D. Cherry of Haley & Olson PC.
`
`Roku is represented by Alexander J. Hadjis, Lisa M. Mandrusiak, W. Todd Baker, Christopher Ricciuti and
`Frank West of Oblon McClelland Maier & Neustadt LLP, Richard D. Milvenan of McGinnis Lochridge LLP,
`and David N. Deaconson of Pakis Giotes Page & Burleson PC.
`
`The case is MV3 Partners LLC v. Roku Inc., case number 6:18-cv-00308, in the U.S. District Court for the
`Western District of Texas.
`
`--Additional reporting by Ryan Davis and Dani Kass. Editing by Adam LoBelia.
`
`For a reprint of this article, please contact reprints@law360.com.
`
`0 Comments
`
`Sign In To Comment
`
`Useful Tools & Links
`
`Add to Briefcase
`Save to PDF & Print
`Rights/Reprints
`Editorial Contacts
`
`Related Sections
`
`https://www.law360.com/articles/1299933
`
`3/7
`
`3
`
`

`

`Roku's Trial Delay Request OK'd By 'Surprised' Texas Judge - Law360
`
`12/30/21, 2:53 PM
`Legal Industry
`
`Case Information
`
`Case Title
`
`MV3 Partners LLC v. Roku, Inc.
`
`Case Number
`
`6:18-cv-00308
`
`Court
`
`Texas Western
`
`Nature of Suit
`
`Patent
`
`Judge
`
`Alan D Albright
`
`Date Filed
`
`October 16, 2018
`
`Law Firms
`
`Haley & Olson
`Kasowitz Benson
`McGinnis Lochridge
`Oblon
`Pakis Giotes
`
`Companies
`
`Roku Inc.
`
`Government Agencies
`
`U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas
`
`Patents
`
`8,863,223 - Mobile set top box
`
`Judge Analytics
`https://www.law360.com/articles/1299933
`
`4/7
`
`4
`
`

`

`12/30/21, 2:53 PM
`powered by Lex Machina®
`
` Alan D Albright
` Orlando L. Garcia
`
`Roku's Trial Delay Request OK'd By 'Surprised' Texas Judge - Law360
`
`The 2021 Regional Powerhouses
`
`The law firms on Law360's list of 2021 Regional Powerhouses are handling some of the biggest deals and most
`high-profile courtroom battles across eight states, offering clients regional expertise and making a lasting impact
`on the law at the state and local level.
`
`Top 10 trending in Intellectual Property
`
`1Fed. Circ. Judge Warns Of Confusion In Patent Appeals
`2Judge Told CardioNet Owes $2.9M In Fees For 'Misconduct'
`34 Big Issues That Shaped The PTAB In 2021
`4In Rare Move, Albright Stays 5 Cases For PTAB Reviews
`5Albright's Caseload Prompts Court Admin To Eye WDTX Policy
`6New Draft Policy Will Create Obstacles For SEP Owners
`7Judge Awards $13M In Moving Co. TM, Cybersquatting Fight
`8NFL, Fanatics Accused Of Monopolizing Amazon Market
`9The Biggest Trademark Rulings Of 2021
`10Albright Transfer Drama Will Keep Eyes On Texas In 2022
`
`Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.
`
`How can I help you today?
`https://www.law360.com/articles/1299933
`
`5/7
`
`5
`
`

`

`12/30/21, 2:53 PM
`
`Roku's Trial Delay Request OK'd By 'Surprised' Texas Judge - Law360
`
`For example, you can type:
`
`I forgot my password
`I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
`How do I sign up for a newsletter?
`
`Ask a question!
`

`
`© 2021, Portfolio Media, Inc. | About | Contact Us |
`Legal Jobs | Advertise with Law360 | Careers at
`Law360 | Terms | Privacy Policy | Cookie Settings | Help | Site Map
`
`Ask a question!
`
`Already have access? Click here to login
`Get instant access to the one-stop news source for business
`lawyers
`
`Register Now!
`Sign up now for free access to this content
`
`Enter your details below and select your area(s) of interest to stay ahead of the curve and receive Law360's daily newsletters
`
`Email (NOTE: Free email domains not supported)
`
`First Name
`
`Last Name
`
`Password (at least 8 characters required)
`
`Confirm Password
`
`Select at least one primary interest:
` Access To Justice
` Asset Management
` Benefits
` Capital Markets
` Commercial Litigation Uk
` Construction
` Corporate Crime & Compliance
`
`Uk
`
` Environmental
`https://www.law360.com/articles/1299933
`
` Aerospace & Defense
` Banking
` California
` Class Action
` Competition
` Consumer Protection
` Cybersecurity & Privacy
` Employment
` Financial Services Uk
`
` Appellate
` Bankruptcy
` Cannabis
` Commercial Contracts
` Compliance
` Corporate
` Delaware
` Energy
` Fintech
`
`6/7
`
`6
`
`

`

`12/30/21, 2:53 PM
` Florida
` Government Contracts
` Illinois
` Insurance Uk
` International Trade
` Massachusetts
` Native American
` Pennsylvania
`
`Roku's Trial Delay Request OK'd By 'Surprised' Texas Judge - Law360
` Food & Beverage
` Georgia
` Health
` Hospitality
` Immigration
` Insurance
` Intellectual Property
` International Arbitration
` Legal Ethics
` Life Sciences
` Media & Entertainment
` Mergers & Acquisitions
` New Jersey
` New York
` Personal Injury & Medical
` Private Equity
`Malpractice
` Product Liability
` Real Estate
` Public Policy
` Project Finance
` Sports & Betting
` Securities
` Retail & E Commerce
` Texas
` Telecommunications
` Technology
` White Collar
` Trials
` Transportation
`Law360 may contact you in your professional capacity with information about our other products, services and events that we believe may be of interest.
`
`You’ll be able to update your communication preferences via the unsubscribe link provided within our communications.
`
`We take your privacy seriously. Please see our Privacy Policy.
`Register

`
`Sign up for our Intellectual Property newsletter
`
`You must correct or enter the following before you can sign up:
`
`Please provide a professional email:
`Select more newsletters to receive for free
`
`Law360 takes your privacy seriously. Please see our Privacy Policy.
`No Thanks Sign up now
`
`Thank You!
`
`https://www.law360.com/articles/1299933
`
`7/7
`
`7
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket