throbber
MEDICALSCIENCES
`
`Ultra-deep sequencing detects ovarian cancer cells in
`peritoneal fluid and reveals somatic TP53 mutations
`in noncancerous tissues
`
`Jeffrey D. Krimmela, Michael W. Schmitta,b, Maria I. Harrellc, Kathy J. Agnewc, Scott R. Kennedya, Mary J. Emondd,
`Lawrence A. Loeba, Elizabeth M. Swisherc, and Rosa Ana Risquesa,1
`
`aDepartment of Pathology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195; bDivisions of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine,
`University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195; cDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195; and dDepartment
`of Statistics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195
`
`Edited by Philip C. Hanawalt, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, and approved March 31, 2016 (received for review January 25, 2016)
`
`Current sequencing methods are error-prone, which precludes the
`identification of low frequency mutations for early cancer detection.
`Duplex sequencing is a sequencing technology that decreases errors
`by scoring mutations present only in both strands of DNA. Our aim
`was to determine whether duplex sequencing could detect extremely
`rare cancer cells present in peritoneal fluid from women with high-
`grade serous ovarian carcinomas (HGSOCs). These aggressive cancers
`are typically diagnosed at a late stage and are characterized by TP53
`mutations and peritoneal dissemination. We used duplex sequencing
`to analyze TP53 mutations in 17 peritoneal fluid samples from women
`with HGSOC and 20 from women without cancer. The tumor TP53
`mutation was detected in 94% (16/17) of peritoneal fluid samples
`from women with HGSOC (frequency as low as 1 mutant per
`24,736 normal genomes). Additionally, we detected extremely low
`frequency TP53 mutations (median mutant fraction 1/13,139) in peri-
`toneal fluid from nearly all patients with and without cancer (35/37).
`These mutations were mostly deleterious, clustered in hotspots, in-
`creased with age, and were more abundant in women with cancer
`than in controls. The total burden of TP53 mutations in peritoneal
`fluid distinguished cancers from controls with 82% sensitivity (14/17)
`and 90% specificity (18/20). Age-associated, low frequency TP53 mu-
`tations were also found in 100% of peripheral blood samples from
`15 women with and without ovarian cancer (none with hemato-
`logic disorder). Our results demonstrate the ability of duplex se-
`quencing to detect rare cancer cells and provide evidence of
`widespread, low frequency, age-associated somatic TP53 mutation
`in noncancerous tissue.
`TP53 mutations | ultra-deep sequencing | ovarian cancer | clonal
`hematopoiesis | premalignant mutations
`The detection of tumor-specific mutations in clinically accessible
`
`samples has enormous potential to transform cancer diagnos-
`tics, monitoring, and screening. However, a major limitation is
`insufficiently accurate sequencing methods. Conventional next-
`generation sequencing (NGS) technologies have a high false pos-
`itive error rate, which precludes reliable detection of mutations at
`frequencies <1/100 (1). “Molecular tagging” of single-stranded
`DNA decreases the rate of false mutations to less than 1 per 10,000
`sequenced nucleotides and has been successfully applied to the
`detection of mutant cancer DNA in a variety of clinical samples (2–
`6). However, this false positive error rate limits the specificity of
`this method in challenging situations in which ultra-deep se-
`quencing is needed to detect extremely low frequency mutant
`molecules (e.g., <1/10,000), as is the case of ovarian cancer DNA in
`Pap smears (5). Because true mutations are indistinguishable from
`artifacts, compromised specificity leads to lower sensitivity and
`overall low diagnostic accuracy. Duplex sequencing is an NGS
`technology that employs molecular tagging of both strands of DNA
`independently. True mutations are defined as mutations that are
`present at the same position in both strands of DNA and that are
`complementary (7). This internal error correction effectively reduces
`
`false positive mutations because PCR and sequencing artifacts are
`very unlikely to occur at both strands of DNA at the same position
`and with complementary nucleotide changes (theoretical false
`positive rate is ∼4 × 10−10) (7). Previous studies have demonstrated
`that duplex sequencing is able to detect a single point mutation
`among >107 sequenced nucleotides (7, 8), an unprecedented ac-
`curacy that holds significant potential for early cancer detection.
`High-grade serous ovarian carcinoma (HGSOC) is the most
`common and most aggressive type of ovarian cancer, with a dismal
`5-y survival rate of 10–30% (9). A main cause of poor prognosis is
`the absence of effective screening tools to detect early-stage disease.
`HGSOC frequently metastasizes through the peritoneal cavity, the
`anatomic potential space between abdominal and pelvic organs and
`the abdominal walls. The putative premalignant lesion to HGSOC
`is intraepithelial neoplasia in the distal fallopian tube (also known
`as serous tubal intraepithelial carcinoma), which is in direct conti-
`nuity with the peritoneal cavity (10–12). Even in the absence of
`gross metastasis to the peritoneum, ovarian cancer cells can fre-
`quently be found in peritoneal fluid upon cytopathological exami-
`nation, and the presence of these cells has prognostic value in the
`current clinical staging system (13). Thus, peritoneal fluid is rou-
`tinely collected during surgery for women with suspected ovarian
`cancer. We reasoned that peritoneal fluid is an optimal clinical
`biopsy for high-sensitivity early detection of ovarian cancer because
`
`Significance
`
`The detection of rare tumor-specific somatic mutations in “liquid
`biopsies” is limited by the high error rate of DNA sequencing
`technologies. By sequencing peritoneal fluid from women with
`high-grade serous ovarian cancer, we demonstrate that duplex
`sequencing, currently the most accurate sequencing technology, is
`able to detect one cancer cell among tens of thousands of normal
`cells. This unprecedented sensitivity also revealed a striking prev-
`alence of extremely low frequency TP53 mutations in normal tis-
`sue. Women with and without cancer harbored TP53 mutations of
`pathogenic consequences, both in peritoneal fluid and peripheral
`blood. These mutations likely represent a premalignant muta-
`tional background that accumulates in cancer and aging.
`
`Author contributions: J.D.K., L.A.L., E.M.S., and R.A.R. designed research; J.D.K. and M.I.H.
`performed research; M.W.S., K.J.A., and S.R.K. contributed new reagents/analytic tools;
`J.D.K., M.J.E., and R.A.R. analyzed data; and J.D.K., L.A.L., E.M.S., and R.A.R. wrote
`the paper.
`
`Conflict of interest statement: M.W.S. and L.A.L. declare leadership, consulting role, and
`stock ownership at TwinStrand Biosciences, Inc.
`
`This article is a PNAS Direct Submission.
`
`Data deposition: Sequencing data from this paper have been deposited in the Sequence
`Read Archive [accession no. SRP072370 (BioProject ID: PRJNA316476)].
`1To whom correspondence should be addressed. Email: rrisques@uw.edu.
`
`This article contains supporting information online at www.pnas.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10.
`1073/pnas.1601311113/-/DCSupplemental.
`
`www.pnas.org/cgi/doi/10.1073/pnas.1601311113
`
`PNAS | May 24, 2016 | vol. 113 | no. 21 | 6005–6010
`
`Downloaded by guest on February 7, 2022
`
`00001
`
`EX1070
`
`

`

`ycneuqerF elellA tnatuM romuT
`
`in Peritoneal Fluid
`
`10 11 12 13 14 15A 15B 16
`9
`8
`7
`6
`5
`4
`3
`2
`1
` ID
`Stage
`IA IC IA IC IIB IIC IIC IIIB IIIB IIIB IIIC IIIC IIIC NA REC REC
`0
`Cytology neg neg pos neg pos neg neg pos neg neg pos neg atyp pos neg pos atyp
`
`Fig. 1. TP53 mutations detected in ovarian tumors are also present in peri-
`toneal fluid. Sample ID, Fédération Internationale de Gynécologie et d’Obsté-
`trique (FIGO) stage, and cytopathological results are indicated in the x axis.
`Samples 1–3 correspond to cancers incidentally discovered at prophylactic sur-
`gery in women with hereditary BRCA mutations. Samples 15A and 15B corre-
`spond to primary and recurrence surgeries from the same patient. Sample 15A
`was unstaged because this patient was undergoing chemotherapy for a pre-
`viously diagnosed breast malignancy. Tumor mutant allele frequency was cal-
`culated as the number of Duplex Consensus Sequence (DCS) reads with the
`given mutation divided by the total DCS nucleotides sequenced at the mutation
`coordinate. Tumor 16 was the only one with an indel, and matching peritoneal
`fluid showed the indel mutations in single-strand consensus sequences, but not
`DCS. Errors bars represent the exact/Clopper–Pearson 95% confidence interval.
`atyp, atypical; NA, not available; neg, negative; pos, positive; REC, recurrence.
`
`was, however, significantly associated with positive peritoneal fluid
`cytology (mean ± SD, 0.212 ± 0.30 in positive cytology vs. 0.004 ±
`0.009 in negative or atypical cytology, Mann–Whitney P = 0.009)
`and ascites as opposed to peritoneal washes (mean ± SD, 0.132 ±
`0.27 in ascites vs. 0.048 ± 0.15 in peritoneal washes, Mann–Whitney
`P = 0.009). After adjusting for possible confounding of one variable
`by another in multivariate models, higher TMAF remained asso-
`ciated with ascites but not with positive cytology. In addition to
`ascites, older age also associated with higher TMAF in all models
`(SI Appendix, Table S4).
`
`Low Frequency TP53 Mutations Were Found in Peritoneal Fluid from
`Nearly All Patients. We detected low frequency (<0.001) TP53
`mutations in nearly all of the peritoneal fluid samples from women
`with and without cancer (Fig. 2) (16/17 cancers and 19/20 controls).
`A total of 197 mutations were found (Dataset S2): 97 mutations in
`ovarian cancer patients and 100 mutations in controls. It was pre-
`viously demonstrated that duplex sequencing is able to uniquely
`detect a single mutation among >107 sequenced nucleotides, which
`places the false positive rate of this technology below 10−7 (7).
`Using this figure as a conservative estimate of the false positive
`error rate and given the fact that a total of ∼3.8 × 108 DCS nu-
`cleotides were sequenced in this study, we calculated that poten-
`tially ∼38 mutations could be artifacts. This figure represents only
`20% of all of the mutations found and leaves >150 mutations
`unlikely to be explained as technological error. To distinguish them
`from the tumor mutations, we termed these highly prevalent low
`frequency TP53 mutations “biological background.”
`The mean number of biological background mutations per sample
`was 5.3 (range, 0–14). The number of mutations was directly pro-
`portional to the DCS depth for each sample (i.e., the deeper a sample
`was sequenced, the more mutations were found) (SI Appendix, Fig.
`S2). For cancer patients, the tumor mutation was more abundant
`than biological background mutations in the majority of peritoneal
`fluid samples (11/16) and was at least 10-fold more abundant than
`biological background mutations in 50% (8/16) of samples (Fig. 2A).
`
`Low Frequency TP53 Mutations in Peritoneal Fluid Are Similar to
`Cancer-Specific TP53 Mutations. To explore whether these low
`
`HGSOC disseminates early and preferentially to the peritoneal
`cavity, suggesting that cancer cells may be more abundant in peri-
`toneal fluid than in the relatively distant uterine cavity or cervix, as
`previously attempted by other studies (5, 14).
`An important feature of HGSOC, which may facilitate early de-
`tection by high-sensitivity sequencing, is the high prevalence of tumor
`protein p53 gene (TP53) mutations (>96%) (15, 16), even in pre-
`malignant lesions (17). Moreover, >95% of TP53 mutations cluster in
`exons 4–10 (15), which provides a relatively small target to perform
`cost-efficient ultra-deep sequencing (8). Thus, we used duplex se-
`quencing to sequence TP53 exons 4–10 in peritoneal fluid from pa-
`tients with HGSOC with known TP53 mutations and control patients
`without ovarian cancer. Our goal was to provide proof of principle of
`the ability of duplex sequencing to detect very rare cancer cells, and
`thus the study was enriched for subjects with early stage disease or
`negative peritoneal fluid by traditional cytological evaluation.
`
`Results
`Patients and Sequencing Information. Sixteen patients with HGSOC
`(“ovarian cancers”) (SI Appendix, Table S1) and 20 patients without
`detected gynecologic malignancy (“controls”) (SI Appendix, Table
`S2) were included in this study. Seven ovarian cancer patients and
`10 control patients had germline BRCA1 or BRCA2 breast cancer
`genes mutations. Half of the cancers were early stage (0–II). TP53
`mutations were determined by NGS in all primary tumors except
`three occult microscopic cancers, for which Sanger sequencing was
`used due to the limited amount of DNA (SI Appendix, SI Materials
`and Methods) (18–20). A single clonal TP53 mutation was found in
`all tumors (SI Appendix, Table S3). No additional clonal or sub-
`clonal TP53 mutations were found in any of the primary tumors
`(NGS average depth was ∼300×). Peritoneal fluid was centrifuged,
`and DNA was extracted from the cell pellet, obtaining an average
`of 11.9 μg of DNA (range 1.1–112 μg). Duplex sequencing for TP53
`exons 4–10, which cover >95% of mutations in HGSOC (15), was
`performed. Molecular tagging of both strands of DNA allowed us to
`group raw reads sharing the same molecular tag into a single-strand
`consensus sequence (SSCS) and to collapse the two SSCSs with
`complementary tags into a single, highly accurate duplex consensus
`sequence (DCS) (SI Appendix, Fig. S1). The median DCS depth was
`calculated as the median DCS coverage at each genomic position in
`the capture target, and this value essentially corresponds to the total
`number of unique haploid genomes sequenced. The median DCS
`depth for the 37 peritoneal fluid samples ranged from 1,689 to
`36,133. Sequencing information is presented in Dataset S1.
`
`Duplex Sequencing Detected Tumor-Specific TP53 Mutations in
`Almost All Ovarian Cancer Peritoneal Fluid Samples. The TP53 mu-
`tation identified in the primary tumor was detected in 94% (16/
`17) of HGSOC peritoneal fluid samples (Fig. 1), including 9
`peritoneal fluids without malignant cytopathology. In one of the
`cases (case 16), the mutation was not detected in DCS reads but
`was present in two SSCS reads well above background. The only
`cancer missed was an occult stage IA carcinoma with negative
`cytopathology. Importantly, half of the tumor mutations (8/16)
`were found at a frequency at or below 0.001 (3/16 at a frequency
`at or below 0.0001) and would not be reliably discernible from
`technical errors with less accurate sequencing techniques.
`In one patient, peritoneal fluid samples were available from two
`different surgeries: primary surgery and subsequent surgery for
`recurrent disease 2 y later. The exact same tumor-specific TP53
`mutation was found in both. The tumor mutant allele frequency
`(TMAF), which should approximate the fraction of tumor cells in
`the sample, increased dramatically from 0.000039 to 0.685 from the
`initial peritoneal wash to the recurrent ascites.
`In univariate analyses of dependent variables vs. TMAF in
`peritoneal fluid, TMAF was not significantly associated with pre-
`operative CA-125 (Spearman test), germline BRCA status, clinical
`stage, or future recurrence (Mann–Whitney test). Higher TMAF
`
`6006 | www.pnas.org/cgi/doi/10.1073/pnas.1601311113
`
`Krimmel et al.
`
`Downloaded by guest on February 7, 2022
`
`00002
`
`

`

`MEDICALSCIENCES
`
`abundance of C:G→T:A transitions. Furthermore, 38.6% of C:G→T:A
`mutations occurred at CpG sites, which are known to be highly
`mutable and prone to deamination. These data are consistent with
`known mutational signatures in cancer associated with age, specif-
`ically signatures 1A and 1B reported in Alexandrov et al. (25, 26).
`
`Low Frequency TP53 Mutations Increase with Cancer and with Age.
`Next, we quantified the frequency of biological background TP53
`mutations for each individual as the number of mutations divided by
`the total number of DCS nucleotides. Interestingly, women with
`ovarian cancer had a significantly higher frequency of TP53 muta-
`tions in exons 4–10 than cancer-free women (8.4 × 10−7 in cancers
`vs. 4.23 × 10−7 in controls, Mann–Whitney P = 0.02) (SI Appendix,
`Fig. S8), and this significant difference remained after adjusting for
`age and BRCA status (P = 0.004). Although our study was focused
`on TP53 coding mutations, the sequencing protocol resulted in the
`incidental capture of intronic regions contiguous with TP53 exons
`4–10, which also contain low-frequency biological background mu-
`tations. The frequency of mutations in introns was higher in cancers
`than in controls, but this comparison was not statistically significant
`(SI Appendix, Fig. S8). Notably, in control women, we found that
`the frequency of TP53 biological background mutations increased
`with age for mutations found in exons (Fig. 4A) as well as in introns
`(Fig. 4B). The frequency of mutations increased by 2.2 × 10−7
`for every 10-y increase in age for exons (P = 0.001 after adjusting for
`BRCA status) and by 1.1 × 10−7 for every 10-y increase in age for
`introns (P = 0.01 after adjusting for BRCA status). These regres-
`sions also were done separately for women with and without
`germline BRCA mutations because of the near complete age sep-
`aration between those two groups and were statistically significant
`for mutations in exons and introns regardless of germline muta-
`tional status (Fig. 4 A and B) with near parallel slopes, as assumed
`in the common regression model. In women with ovarian cancer,
`there was no association of exonic TP53 mutations with age, but the
`intronic mutation frequency showed a significant increase of 3.0 ×
`10−7 with every 10-y increase in age after adjusting for BRCA status
`(P = 0.0004) (Fig. 4 C and D).
`
`B
`
`Missense MutaƟons
`FracƟon of TP53
`
`C
`
`FracƟon of TP53 MutaƟons
`
`A
`
`FracƟon of TP53 MutaƟons
`
`Fig. 3. Characterization of “biological background” TP53 mutations found in
`peritoneal fluid of patients with ovarian cancer (97 mutations) and controls (100
`mutations). The fraction of mutations is indicated for categories of mutation
`type (A), pathogenicity (B), and spectrum (C). TP53 activity of missense muta-
`tions for B was determined via “MUT-TP53 2.00” (24).
`
`OVARIAN CANCER PATIENTS
`
`CONTROL PATIENTS
`
`15A 15B
`
`A
`
`Mutant Allele Frequency
`
`in Peritoneal Fluid
`
`B
`
`Mutant Allele Frequency
`
`in Peritoneal Fluid
`
`Fig. 2. Mutant allele frequency of TP53 mutations (exons 4–10) in perito-
`neal fluid from patients with ovarian cancer (A) and controls (B). Each bar
`represents a unique mutation observed at least once. Mutations are ordered
`by descending mutant allele frequency within each patient. Magenta bars
`indicate tumor mutations.
`
`frequency TP53 mutations were biologically relevant, we first ana-
`lyzed their type. Most of the background mutations were missense,
`both in women with (67/97) and without cancer (72/100) (Fig. 3A).
`The prevalence of missense mutations is consistent with clonal
`TP53 mutations most commonly seen in human cancers in general
`and in ovarian cancers in particular, according to the International
`Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) ovarian cancer database
`(21, 22) (SI Appendix, Fig. S3). Specifically, within exons 5–8, which
`encode the protein’s DNA-binding domain and harbor the majority
`of TP53 mutations found in human cancers, there are 1,567 possible
`single nucleotide substitutions, which are expected to produce
`73.4% missense, 3.7% nonsense, and 22.9% silent mutations (23).
`However, in our study, silent mutations were less than half the
`expected frequency, in both cases and controls (SI Appendix, Fig.
`S4). Nonsynonymous mutations, which include missense and non-
`sense, represented 89.8% (53/59) and 90.0% (63/70) of all single
`nucleotide substitutions in these exons in cases and controls, re-
`spectively, significantly above the 77.1% expected in the absence of
`selection (P = 0.027 in cancers; P = 0.013 in controls, by Fisher’s
`exact test). Approximately 80% of these missense mutations were
`projected to generate an inactive or partially inactive p53 protein
`(Fig. 3B) as determined by TP53-MUT 2.00, an online tool that
`predicts the biological activity of known TP53 mutations (24). In
`addition, missense mutations were enriched in the 9 most com-
`monly mutated “hotspot” TP53 codons (175, 179, 195, 220, 237,
`245, 248, 273, and 282) in ovarian carcinomas according to the
`IARC database (21, 22). These codons represent only 2.7% of the
`codons in our capture set; however, 10/67 missense mutations in
`cancers (14.9%) and 13/72 missense mutations in controls (18.1%)
`clustered in those codons (P = 2 × 10−4 and P < 1 × 10−5, re-
`spectively, by Fisher’s exact test). Importantly, when cancers and
`controls were subdivided by BRCA germline status, the distribu-
`tion of mutation type and the functional impact of missense mu-
`tations remained very similar for each of the groups (SI Appendix,
`Fig. S5). To demonstrate that the findings were not driven by
`outlier individuals, we also plotted the distribution of mutation type
`(SI Appendix, Fig. S6) and predicted functional impact of missense
`mutations (SI Appendix, Fig. S7) for each patient in the study. The
`overwhelming majority of patients (including 19/20 controls) harbored
`at least one deleterious mutation. Next, we analyzed the mutational
`spectra of TP53 mutations found in ovarian cancers and controls
`(Fig. 3C). The spectrum was similar in both groups and showed an
`
`Krimmel et al.
`
`PNAS | May 24, 2016 | vol. 113 | no. 21 | 6007
`
`Downloaded by guest on February 7, 2022
`
`00003
`
`

`

`Fig. 4. Frequency of biological background muta-
`tions (number of mutations divided by total number
`of DCS nucleotides) detected in TP53 exons 4–10
`and corresponding introns in peritoneal fluid of
`women with and without ovarian cancer. Patients’
`age is indicated in the x axis, and germline BRCA
`status is color-coded for ovarian cancers and con-
`trols. Women without ovarian cancer showed sig-
`nificant associations between the frequency of
`biological background TP53 mutations and age,
`both for mutations found in TP53 exons (A) and
`introns (B). Because control women were segre-
`gated into young age and old age depending on
`germline BRCA status, the correlations with age
`(regression lines and Spearman’s test P values) are
`presented separately for women with and without
`BRCA germline mutations. Women with cancer did
`not show a significant association between the
`frequency of biological background TP53 mutations
`in exons and age (C). For introns, the association
`was significant after adjusting for BRCA status (D).
`
`A
`
`CONTROLS- TP53 exons
`
`B
`
`CONTROLS- TP53 introns
`
`p=0.008
`
`p=0.05
`
`p=0.003
`
`p=0.05
`
`C
`
`OVARIAN CANCERS- TP53 exons
`
`D
`
`OVARIAN CANCERS- TP53 introns
`
`p=0.0004
`
`Frequency of TP53 Biological
`
`Background MutaƟons
`
`Frequency of TP53 Biological
`
`Background MutaƟons
`
`peritoneal fluid sample from the same patient, further proving the
`validity of these mutations. Leukocytes are common in peritoneal
`fluid (34), and, thus, overlap of mutations between matched blood
`and peritoneal fluid is expected. In one patient with ovarian cancer,
`the primary tumor TP53 mutation was identified in blood DNA,
`consistent with the presence of circulating tumor cells or cell free
`tumor DNA in whole blood. In the other six ovarian cancer pa-
`tients, the tumor-specific TP53 mutation was not found in blood.
`The type, pathogenicity, and spectrum of the TP53 mutations
`found in blood were very similar to mutations found in perito-
`neal fluid (SI Appendix, Fig. S9). In addition, similar to perito-
`neal fluid, 21.6% (8/37) of the nontumor missense mutations
`were present at one of the nine previously mentioned TP53
`hotspot codons although these codons represent only 2.7% of
`the total codons in TP53 exons 4–10 (P = 6 × 10−5). Further-
`more, consistent with our findings in peritoneal fluid and
`reported age-related clonal hematopoiesis (28–30, 32, 33), the
`frequency of TP53 biological background mutations in periph-
`eral blood increased significantly with patient age (P = 0.011).
`
`Discussion
`This study demonstrates that duplex sequencing—the most accu-
`rate NGS technique currently available—is able to identify tumor
`DNA at mutant allele frequencies as low as ∼1/25,000, which is
`
`TP53 MutaƟon Burden
`
`in Peritoneal Fluid
`
`OVARIAN CANCER PATIENTS
`
`CONTROL PATIENTS
`
`Fig. 5. TP53 mutation burden in peritoneal fluid distinguishes women with
`ovarian cancer from controls. Within each group, patients are sorted by
`ascending age, indicated in the x axis. For each sample, the mutation burden
`was calculated as the total number of mutant TP53 molecules (exons 4–10)
`divided by total DCS nucleotides sequenced. A threshold of 10−6 (red line,
`corresponding to one mutation for one million nucleotides) distinguishes
`cancers and controls with 82% (14/17) sensitivity and 90% specificity (18/20).
`
`TP53 Mutation Burden in Peritoneal Fluid Distinguishes Individuals
`With and Without Ovarian Cancer. We sought to assess whether
`the TP53 mutations detected in peritoneal fluid samples could
`distinguish individuals with ovarian cancer from controls without
`knowledge of the primary tumor TP53 mutation. As previously
`shown, almost all cancer samples harbor the tumor mutation (some
`at relatively high allele frequency) (Fig. 1), and most cancer samples
`carry more TP53 biological background mutations than controls
`(Fig. 4C vs. Fig. 4A). Thus, we reasoned that the total burden of
`mutated TP53 molecules found in a sample could be a useful bio-
`marker to distinguish individuals with and without cancer. For each
`sample, the mutation burden was calculated as the total number of
`mutant TP53 molecules in exons 4–10 divided by the total number
`of DCS nucleotides sequenced. Fourteen out of 17 peritoneal fluid
`samples from cancer patients had a TP53 mutation burden >10−6
`(Fig. 5). In contrast, only 2 out of 20 controls reached that
`threshold, and, interestingly, they were among the oldest controls in
`the study (Fig. 5). These frequencies correspond to 82% sensitivity
`and 90% specificity for distinguishing cancer patients from controls.
`
`Low Frequency TP53 Mutations Are also Found in Peripheral Blood.
`The observation that TP53 biological background mutations are
`present in the peritoneal fluid of essentially all patients (with and
`without ovarian cancer) provides evidence for the emerging concept
`that somatic mutation in classically cancer-associated “driver” genes
`may occur in “normal” tissues (27). However, because peritoneal
`fluid consists of a heterogeneous mixture of cell types, we sought to
`assess whether rare TP53-mutated subclones were present in a dif-
`ferent sample source. We chose peripheral blood because multiple
`studies have demonstrated that clonal hematopoiesis with mutations
`in driver genes occurs in a subset of normal individuals (28–33).
`We applied duplex sequencing to whole blood samples from 15
`women in our study (7 with ovarian cancer and 8 without cancer).
`No patients had known history of hematologic disease, and all but
`one were chemotherapy-naive at sample collection. We identified
`at least one low frequency TP53 mutation in all patients (15/15),
`with a range of 1–8 mutations per sample (Fig. 6). A comprehen-
`sive list of these mutations can be found in Dataset S2. Similar to
`the findings in peritoneal fluid, these mutant clones were exclu-
`sively present at extremely low mutant allele frequency (≤0.001),
`and, thus, they are undetectable by less accurate sequencing
`methods. Importantly, 22% (13/58) of the biological background
`mutations in peripheral blood were also detected in the matched
`
`6008 | www.pnas.org/cgi/doi/10.1073/pnas.1601311113
`
`Krimmel et al.
`
`Downloaded by guest on February 7, 2022
`
`00004
`
`

`

`OVARIAN CANCER PATIENTS
`
`CONTROL PATIENTS
`
`Fig. 6. TP53 mutations in peripheral blood. Patient ID is in-
`dicated in the x axis. Each bar represents a unique mutation ob-
`served in at least one DCS. Mutations are ordered by descending
`mutant allele frequency within each sample. The tumor TP53
`mutation was detected in peripheral blood of case 9 but was not
`found in any other cases.
`
`doolB ni ycneuqerF elellA tnatuM
`
`MEDICALSCIENCES
`
`beyond the capabilities of other sequencing technologies. Ultra-
`deep sequencing of TP53 by duplex sequencing enabled the de-
`tection of tumor DNA in peritoneal fluid from women with ovarian
`cancer with 94% sensitivity, despite enriching cases for early stage
`and negative peritoneal cytology. Tumor DNA was present in some
`cases that would otherwise challenge clinical detection, in particular
`two cancers that were microscopic and identified only at risk-
`reducing surgery. These results provide evidence that ovarian can-
`cer cells are present in the peritoneum even at the earliest de-
`tectable stages of disease and before clinically apparent metastasis.
`The high resolution afforded by duplex sequencing uncovered the
`presence of extremely low frequency, cancer-like TP53 mutations in
`peritoneal fluid and peripheral blood from nearly all patients with and
`without ovarian cancer. We termed these mutations “biological
`background” to distinguish them from tumor-specific TP53 muta-
`tions. Previous studies have reported somatic mutation of cancer-
`associated genes in normal tissue (blood and skin), but generally in
`relatively small subsets of older individuals (27–33, 35). Here, we
`show that low frequency, cancer-like TP53 mutations in noncancerous
`tissue are very common, but almost exclusively occur at allele fre-
`quencies <0.001, which is below the limit of detection of conventional
`sequencing methods. Remarkably, the only biological background
`mutation at frequency >0.001 was found in the oldest woman in the
`control group. Thus, our results demonstrate widespread, low fre-
`quency TP53 mutagenesis, in nearly all individuals, that increases with
`aging and cancer. These mutations are likely present in both the
`mesothelial lining of the peritoneal cavity (the dominant cell type in
`peritoneal fluid samples) as well as in leukocytes. We speculate that
`biological background mutation may be a phenomenon common to
`all healthy replicative tissues, but larger studies including multiple
`tissue samples from healthy individuals across a wide range of ages
`will be necessary to fully explore this concept.
`Several lines of evidence confirm that the majority of these bi-
`ological background mutations are functional and not technical ar-
`tifacts. First, they closely resemble TP53 mutations in cancers: nearly
`all of them are predicted to partially or completely inactivate TP53,
`they are predominantly C:G→T:A transitions, and they cluster in
`TP53 hotspot codons. Second, they are more abundant in women with
`cancer than in women cancer-free, and, in the latter, they increase
`with age. The age effect was observed for mutations detected in both
`exons and introns, and independently in the analysis of peritoneal fluid
`and peripheral blood. This age dependency is in concordance with
`prior studies of somatic mutations in noncancerous tissues (28–30, 32,
`33) and supports the notion that “clock-like mutations” commonly
`found in cancers accumulate in normal cells with aging before the
`development of cancer (25). Third, a proportion (13/58) of the low
`frequency mutations found in blood were also detected in peritoneal
`fluid from the same patient. Because peritoneal fluid is known to
`contain a variable number of leukocytes (34), this overlapping is
`expected and demonstrates the reproducibility of our approach.
`Our results indicate that noncancerous tissue carries clones with
`positively selected driver TP53 mutations. This finding is in agree-
`ment with a recent report of somatic cancer mutations in normal
`
`human skin (36). Multiple cancer-associated driver genes, including
`TP53, seemed to be mutated and clonally expanded in large patches
`of morphologically normal skin cells. Although the high prevalence
`of these clones was surprising, it is consistent with the concept that
`cancer is the result of clonal evolution over the lifespan of an in-
`dividual. It is conceivable for multiple competing clones with cancer
`driver mutations to coexist and remain untransformed within nor-
`mal tissue, and it is expected that the number and size of these
`clones would increase with age. It is also expected that the indi-
`viduals that harbor more of these clones have higher probability of
`developing cancer. Indeed, individuals in previous studies carrying
`detectable somatic mutations in blood were at increased risk of
`developing hematopoietic malignancies (28–31, 33). Elevated mu-
`tagenesis is thought to be a characteristic feature of premalignant
`and malignant tissues (37), and our finding that women with
`HGSOC have a significantly higher burden of TP53 mutations in
`peritoneal fluid is cons

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket