`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`MARSHALL DIVISION
`
`§ §§§§
`
`§§§
`
`BRIGHT DATA LTD.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`TESO LT, UAB, METACLUSTER LT,
`UAB, OXYSALES, UAB,
`
`Defendants.
`
` CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:19-CV-00395-JRG
`
`JURY VERDICT FORM
`
`In answering the following questions and completing this Verdict Form, you
`
`are to follow all the instructions I have given you in the Court s Final July
`
`Instructions. Your answers to each question must be unanimous. Some of the
`
`questions contain legal terms that are defined and explained in detail in the Final
`
`Juiy Instructions. You should refer to and consider the Final Jury Instructions as you
`
`answer the questions in this Verdict Form.
`
`Code200, UAB, et al. v. Bright Data Ltd.
`Code200's Exhibit 1080
`Page 1 of 8
`
`
`
`Case 2:19-cv-00395-JRG Document 516 Filed 11/05/21 Page 2 of 8 PageID #: 26263
`
`As used herein, the following terms have the following meanings:
`
`• Bright Data refers to Plaintiff Bright Data, Ltd. (formerly known as
`
`Luminati Networks Ltd.)
`
`• Oxylabs refers collectively to Defendants Teso LT, UAB, Oxysales,
`
`UAB, and Metacluster LT, UAB.
`
`® The “ 319 Patent” refers to U.S. Patent No. 10,257,319.
`
`• The “ 510 Patent refers to U.S. Patent No. 10,484,510.
`
`• The “’614 Patent refers to U.S. Patent No. 10,469,614.
`
`• “Asserted Patents refers collectively to the ’319 Patent, the ’510
`
`Patent, and the ’614 Patent.
`
`• The Asserted Claims refers collectively to:
`
`o Claims 1 and 26 of the ’319 Patent;
`
`o Claims 1 and 22 of the ’510 Patent; and
`
`o Claims 1, 11, 16, and 20 of the ’614 Patent.
`
`2
`
`Code200, UAB, et al. v. Bright Data Ltd.
`Code200's Exhibit 1080
`Page 2 of 8
`
`
`
`Case 2:19-cv-00395-JRG Document 516 Filed 11/05/21 Page 3 of 8 PageID #: 26264
`
`IT IS VERY IMPORTANT THAT YOU FOLLOW THE
`INSTRUCTIONS PROVIDED IN THIS VERDICT FORM.
`
`READ THEM CAREFULLY AND
`ENSURE YOUR VERDICT COMPLIES WITH THEM.
`
`3
`
`Code200, UAB, et al. v. Bright Data Ltd.
`Code200's Exhibit 1080
`Page 3 of 8
`
`
`
`Case 2:19-cv-00395-JRG Document 516 Filed 11/05/21 Page 4 of 8 PageID #: 26265
`
`QUESTION NO. 1
`
`Did Bright Data prove by a preponderance of the evidence that Oxylabs infringed
`
`ANY of the Asserted Claims?
`
`Yes: No:
`
`4
`
`Code200, UAB, et al. v. Bright Data Ltd.
`Code200's Exhibit 1080
`Page 4 of 8
`
`
`
`Case 2:19-cv-00395-JRG Document 516 Filed 11/05/21 Page 5 of 8 PageID #: 26266
`
`QUESTION NO. 2
`
`Did Oxylabs prove by clear and convincing evidence that any of the following
`
`Asserted Claims are invalid?
`
`Claim 1 of the 319 Patent Yes: No: V
`
`Claim 26 of the 319 Patent Yes: No:
`
`Claim 1 of the 510 Patent Yes: No: \/
`
`Claim 22 of the ’510 Patent Yes: No: \/
`
`Claim 1 of the ’614 Patent Yes: No: \/
`
`Claim 11 of the ’614 Patent Yes: No:
`
`Claim 16 of the ’614 Patent Yes: No: i
`
`Claim 20 of the ’614 Patent Yes: No:
`
`5
`
`Code200, UAB, et al. v. Bright Data Ltd.
`Code200's Exhibit 1080
`Page 5 of 8
`
`
`
`Case 2:19-cv-00395-JRG Document 516 Filed 11/05/21 Page 6 of 8 PageID #: 26267
`
`If you answered No to Question No. 1, OR YES to ALL Asserted Claims in
`Question No. 2, then DO NOT answer Question No. 3.
`
`Answer Question No. 3 ONLY as to any Asserted Claim that you have found
`BOTH to be infringed AND not invalid.
`
`QUESTION NO. 3
`
`Did Bright Data prove by a preponderance of the evidence that Oxylabs willfully
`
`infringed ANY of the Asserted Claims that you found were infringed?
`
`Yes: No:
`
`6
`
`Code200, UAB, et al. v. Bright Data Ltd.
`Code200's Exhibit 1080
`Page 6 of 8
`
`
`
`Case 2:19-cv-00395-JRG Document 516 Filed 11/05/21 Page 7 of 8 PageID #: 26268
`
`If you answered No to Question No. 1, OR YES to ALL Asserted Claims in
`Question No. 2, then DO NOT answer Question No. 4.
`
`Answer Question No. 4 ONLY as to an Asserted Claim that you have found
`BOTH to be infringed AND not invalid.
`
`QUESTION NO. 4
`
`What sum of money, if any, has Bright Data proven by a preponderance of the
`
`evidence that it is entitled to receive from Oxylabs as lost profits?
`
`Answer in United States Dollars and Cents, if any:
`
`7
`
`Code200, UAB, et al. v. Bright Data Ltd.
`Code200's Exhibit 1080
`Page 7 of 8
`
`
`
`Case 2:19-cv-00395-JRG Document 516 Filed 11/05/21 Page 8 of 8 PageID #: 26269
`
`FINAL PAGE OF JURY VERDICT FORM
`
`
`
`
`
`You have now reached the end of the Verdict Form and should review it to
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`ensure it accurately reflects your unanimous determinations. The Jury Foreperson
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`should then sign and date the Verdict From in the space below. Once this is done,
`
`
`
`
`
`notify the Court Security Officer that you have reached a verdict. The Jury
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Foreperson should keep the Verdict Form and bring it when the jury is brought back
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`into the courtroom.
`
`
`
`
`
`Signed this 511). day of November, 2021.
`
`________________________
`Jury Foreperson
`
`8
`
`Code200, UAB, et al. v. Bright Data Ltd.
`Code200's Exhibit 1080
`Page 8 of 8
`
`