throbber
A Randomized, Double-blind,Placebo-Controlled, Single-, Ascending-, Oral-Dose Safety, Tolerability and Pharmacokinetic
`Study of SP-304 in Healthy Adult Human Male and Female Volunteers
`Kunwar Shailubhai, Ph.D., William Gerson, D.O., Craig Talluto, Ph.D., Gary Jacob, Ph.D.
`
`DigfSiveDiseaseWllek.Sanlliego:1008,
`
`Purpose: SP·304 is a synthetic analog of uroguan~in, a
`nabiuretic honnone that regulab!s ion and fluid transport in
`the GI tract The compound is a new member of a novel
`class of non-systemic drugs for treabnent of chronic
`constipation (CC), irritable bowel syndrome with
`constipation (IBS-C) and other GI diseases. Orally
`administered SP-304 binds to and activates gua~ab!
`cyclase C (GC-C), expressed on the epithelial cells lining the
`GI mucosa, Activation of GC·C stimulates intracellular cyclic
`GMP synthesi~ resulting in activation of cystic fibrosis
`transmembrane conductance regulalDr (CFTR), whidl leads
`to an augmented flow of chloride and wab!r into the lumen
`of the gut to facilitate bowel movement In animal models,
`oral administration of SP·304 promotes inb!stinal secretion
`and ameliorab!s gastrointestinal inflammation. The purpose
`of this study was to characterize the safety, tolerability,
`phannacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) effects of
`SP-304 in healthy volunb!ers.
`
`Methods: A double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized
`single, oral, ascending dose (0.1 mg to 48.6 mg) study was
`performed in 71 healthy volunteers, Subjects were
`evaluab!d for safety, tolerability, PK and PD effects of
`SP-304. Adverse events (AE) were evaluab!d using Common
`Tenninology Crib!ria for Adverse Events (CTCAE), version 3.
`Pharmacodynamic effects were evaluated by the time ID
`first stool and by the 7-point Bristol Stool Form Sc.ale (BSFS)
`to monitor stool consistency.
`
`Results: SP-304 was well-tolerated at all dose levels and no
`SAEs were observed throughout the study, No measurab~
`systemic absorption of orally administered SP-304 occurred
`at all dose levels studied (0.1 mg ID 48.6 mg; validab!d
`SP·304 serum assay sensitive down to 10 ng/ml), Although
`this trial was not powered for statistical significance, SP-304
`appeared to deaease the time to first bowel movement and
`elicited an inaease in the post-dose BSFS versus placebo,
`
`Conclusions: SP-304 was well-tolerab!d at all doses studied
`(0.1 mg ID 48.6 mg) and exhibited pharmacodynamic
`activity in healthy volunteers with no detectable systemic
`absorption. These clinical data support advancing this novel
`analog of urogua~in for further clinical development to
`treat patients with CC and IBS-C,
`
`Uroguanylin Na~ralHonnone
`
`NDDCELCVNVACTGCL
`l:::::::J--l
`
`, 16-meranalogofuroguan~in
`• Singlekeyaminoacidchange
`• Lockedintostableadive
`conformer
`
`SP-304 Uroguan~inAnalog
`NDECELCVNVACffiCL
`, Compact stable molecule
`~
`• Thermoandacidstable/100C,pH
`21,highresistancetoproteases
`• Behaveslikeasmallm~eculedrug
`• Morepotentthanthenatural
`hormone
`
`GC-C Receptor
`
`Sing~lettersdeootedif!erentamloo
`aclds,ColOfedlinesdeootedisulphk!e
`boods
`
`1 The purpose of this was to characterize the safety,
`tolerability, pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic
`(PD) effects of SP-304 in healthy volunb!ers
`IIIIIIMIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
`1 Healthy male or female, between 18 and 64 years of age
`with a body mass index (BM!) between 18 and 29 kg/m2
`1 Negative test for drugs of abuse, hepatitis Band C and
`HIV
`1 Abstain from caffeinab!d beverages, alcohol and nicotine
`for a period of 36 hours pre-dose throogh 48-hours
`post-dose
`1 Abstain from and have no clinical need for supplemental
`fiber 30 days prior to study entry
`
`1 Any pre-existing medical condition considered dinical~
`significant by the Principal Investigator (Pl)
`1 Clinical~ significant abnormal laboratory results at
`Screening
`1 Participation in a clinical trial using an investigational
`dnig within 30 days of the Screening visit
`1 Ingested, injected, or applied any prescription, OTC, or
`herbal medications within 30 days prior to Day 1 dosing
`1 Received any treabnent age~ herbs, or foods (e.g.,
`grapefruit juice) known to inhibit or induce enzymes
`within the cytochrome P450 sysb!m, within 7 days prior
`to Day 1 dosing
`1 Taken any cla55 of phosphodiesb!rase inhibitors within 3
`days prior ID Day 1 dosing
`1 Any episode of abnormal bowel habit (e.g., constipation
`or diarrhea) within 30 days of Day 1
`1 Failure to complete the Screening bowel movement diary
`accurately and complete~ for 7 consecutive days (during
`the 14 day Screening period) prior ID Day 1 dosing
`1 Donation of blood ~1 pint) within 8 weeks, donation of
`plasma within 2 weeks prior to the Screening visi~ or
`receipt of blood products within 8 weeks prior to Day 1
`
`1 Subjects mmpleted a 7-day bowel movement diary during
`the 14-day saeening period
`, 7 consecutive days
`, Bristol Stool From Sf.ale (BSFS) used to asses consisb!ncy
`of bowel movements
`1 Subjects dlecked into the Phase 1 unit 1 day prior to dosing
`1 Pre-dose iab tests were performed to confirm eligibility
`(hematology, blood chemisby, urinalysis, fecal occult blood
`exam, drugs of abuse)
`1 Randomized 6:2 (active:placebo)
`1 Su~ects were dosed at 9:00am (fasting)
`1 PK blood draws were taken pre-dose and 0.5, ~ 1.5, ~ 3, 4,
`6, 8, 1~ 24, 36 and 48 hours post-dose
`1 All post-dose bowel movements were reported to Phase I
`unitstaff
`, Consistency of the stool was graded by the Phase I unit
`staff using BSFS and was recorded in a diary
`
`1 Cohort 1: SP-304 0.1 mg once or matching placebo
`1 Cohort 2: SP-304 0.3 mg once or matching placebo
`1 Cohort 3: SP-304 0.9 mg once or matching placebo
`1 Cohort 4: SP-304 2.7 mg once or matching placebo
`1 Cohort 5: SP-304 5,4 mg once or matching placebo
`1 Cohort 6: SP-304 8.1 mg once or matching placebo
`1 Cohort 7: SP-30416.2 mg once or matdling piacebo
`1 Cohort 8: SP-304 24.3 mg once or matdling piacebo
`1 Cohort 9: SP-304 48,6 mg once or matdling piacebo
`
`Subject Characteristics
`
`... ,
`, ..
`..
`"'
`
`ril,k
`
`lmAl'lficll
`
`Hll[am:orl.!11111
`lln~nt111ii!D
`
`+t.M.46
`-~,11
`
`lij40.Uj
`<>1•.~
`
`111•~
`ll!,?!
`
`111•~
`114.~
`
`BristolScoreofFi~tBowelMovement
`
`FollowingaSingleDoseofSP-304 "i
`
`~ !t
`l
`.
`I u
`
`3t
`
`!
`;
`:
`'
`'
`!
`
`U ~ I
`
`I
`
`!
`
`'
`l 4 5 I J I'
`
`SP-l04Singled~edatainvolunte'"
`Avetajetimttoffrstoowe!JllO'lelllentH!roothl-ihrpost-doJe
`
`I .
`!
`' I ,
`!
`
`'
`
`'
`
`AIIOlnl
`
`1.3
`
`It !l!.!ltlllll.311.1
`
`5~304improvesstoolcon;st,ncy
`S~304Smgie-DoseDcta
`
`SP-304improves~oolconsistency
`51'-l04linsl•DoseDot,
`
`1 Common Terminology Crib!ria for Adverse Events
`(CTCAE), version 3.0, was used to assess all adverse
`events
`1 12 out of 63 su~ects (19%) reported mild AEs
`1 All Afs resolved within 2 hours of dosing
`1 All AEs resolved within 24 hours of being reported
`1 Per CTCAE criteria, diarrhea is defined as an inaease in
`the number of bowel movements per day compared to
`baseline
`1 Not based on changes in consistency as per the Bristol
`Stool form Sc.ale (BSFS)
`
`Number of Afs Reported with an Assigned Relationship ID
`SP·304
`
`* Diarrhea is defined as an inirease in the number of bowel
`movements per day compared ID baseline
`
`1 SP-304 was safe and well·tolerab!d across all doses
`1 NoSAEs
`1 No severe dianhea even at very high doses
`1 No systemic absorption of orally administered SP-304
`1 SP-304 decreased the time to first bowel movement and
`increased the BrislDI (BSFS) score
`
`Bausch Health Ireland Exhibit 2003, Page 1 of 1
`Mylan v. Bausch Health Ireland - IPR2022-01102
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket