`________________
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`________________
`ASSA ABLOY AB, ASSA ABLOY INC., ASSA ABLOY RESIDENTIAL
`GROUP, INC., AUGUST HOME, INC., HID GLOBAL CORPORATION,
`ASSA ABLOY GLOBAL SOLUTIONS, INC.,
`Petitioners,
`v.
`CPC PATENT TECHNOLOGIES PTY LTD.,
`Patent Owner.
`______________
`Case No. IPR2022-01089
`Patent No. 9,269,208
`______________
`________________________________________________________________
`PETITIONERS’ REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT
`
`
`
`IPR2022-01089
`Patent No. 9,269,208
`
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.70 and the Board’s Scheduling Order of January
`
`3, 2023 (Paper 22) as modified by the Board’s Revised Scheduling Order of June
`
`12, 2023 (Paper 31) (the “Scheduling Order”), Petitioners ASSA ABLOY AB,
`
`ASSA ABLOY Inc., ASSA ABLOY Residential Group, Inc., August Home, Inc.,
`
`HID Global Corporation, ASSA ABLOY Global Solutions, Inc., (“Petitioners”)
`
`respectfully requests oral argument in connection with this proceeding (IPR2022-
`
`01089). Per the Scheduling Order, the oral argument will take place on September
`
`28, 2023.
`
`Petitioners propose holding the hearing virtually. However, if the Board is
`
`allowing in-person hearings, Petitioners further request the hearing take place in
`
`the USPTO’s Alexandria, Virginia location.
`
`In light of the fact that this hearing will address the unpatentability of two
`
`patents across three IPR Petitions, Petitioners request ninety (90) minutes in which
`
`to present its arguments for all three IPR proceedings (IPR2022-01006; IPR2022-
`
`01045; and IPR2022-01089).
`
`To comply with 37 C.F.R. § 42.70(a)’s requirement that this request “must
`
`specify the issues to be argued,” and without waiving argument on any issue not
`
`specifically identified below, Petitioners specify at least the following issues to be
`
`argued:
`
`1
`
`
`
`IPR2022-01089
`Patent No. 9,269,208
` That per 35 U.S.C. § 103, claims 10-13 of U.S. Patent No. 9,269,208
`
`are unpatentable as obvious over Bianco in view of Mathiassen;
`
` Any claim constructions, unpatentability grounds, or other issues
`
`raised in the Petition or Petitioner Reply, the Patent Owner
`
`Preliminary Response, the Patent Owner Response, the Patent Owner
`
`Sur-Reply, or the Board’s Institution Decision;
`
` Rebuttal to issues raised by Patent Owner;
`
` Any other motions filed by either party; and
`
` Any other issues that the Board deems necessary for issuing a final
`
`written decision in this proceeding.
`
`Dated: July 18, 2023
`
`Respectfully Submitted,
`
`/ Dion M. Bregman /
`Dion M. Bregman, Reg. No. 45,645
`
`2
`
`
`
`IPR2022-01089
`Patent No. 9,269,208
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.6(e)(4), it is hereby certified that on July 18,
`
`2023 an electronic copy of this PETITIONER’S REQUEST FOR ORAL
`
`ARGUMENT, was served via email to Patent Owner’s counsel of record in this
`
`proceeding:
`
`Andrew C. Ryan (ryan@cantorcolburn.com)
`Steven M Coyle (scoyle@cantorcolburn.com)
`Nicholas A. Geiger (ngeiger@cantorcolburn.com)
`
`Dated: July 18, 2023
`
` / Dion M. Bregman /
`Dion M. Bregman
`
`3
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
