`12015 Wenonga Ln, Leawood, Kansas 66209 - 913-269-6589 -
`webtalkwithbob@gmail.com
`________________________________________________________
`Technology Experience
`Mr. Sherwood is a consultant and expert witness to the legal community on matters
`relating to computing devices, software applications and Internet advertising.
`Mr. Sherwood has testified, and is qualified by education, training, experience or
`occupation, as an expert, on the following matters: IP address server analysis and extraction,
`search engine ranking methods, HTML and XML code analysis, robot analysis, subscription
`based user and affiliate systems, subscription based systems for social networking, CPM
`advertising, venture capital portfolio analysis, click thru rates, key word selection techniques,
`co-branding, merchant selection and analysis for mobile and desktop devices, database
`development and population, Google Local or Places, SEM campaigns, exclusivity content
`sharing agreements, mobile device applications, click thru conversion rates, affiliate
`agreements, revenue sharing and tracking analytics, application software with any text to
`speech or speech to text software, unauthorized use of names, false advertising, unfair
`competition, business valuation, intellectual property, term sheets and patent value, trade
`secret misappropriation, breach of employment contracts, Internet advertising, lead
`generation, affiliate tracking, Website development and deployment, software developer kit
`license interpretation, software development best practices, software deployment methods,
`runtime analysis, derivative product issues, intellectual property valuation based on patents,
`Website analysis, valuation of custom designed software, custom and practice issues
`associated with intellectual property licensing fees, source code and object code license
`agreements, investment letters of intent, secondary considerations for establishing patent
`validity, software best practices for enterprise software development, methods of measuring
`license use, measurement data, verification of software use, functionality and conformance
`with contract development specifications, derivative product rights, best practices with
`respect to derivative products, conformance to license agreement specifications for software
`development, use and distribution.
`
`Experience
`Consultant to business and expert witness to the legal community on matters relating
`to computing devices, business startups, licenses, software development and Internet
`advertising.
`
`Employment History
`
`2016 to Now: Formerly President and currently Chairman of the Board of Directors of
`Identimap, Inc.
`The company develops human resource management software.
`
`July 1996 to March 2015: SmartText Corporation, President.
`
`__________________________________________________________________ Page 1
`
`AlmondNet, Inc.
`IPR2022-01064
`Ex. 2003
`Page 1 of 15
`
`
`
`Robert J. Sherwood
`12015 Wenonga Ln, Leawood, Kansas 66209 - 913-269-6589 -
`webtalkwithbob@gmail.com
`________________________________________________________
`The company developed and licensed specialized software applications under the title
`LegalPoint. The company has no current licenses.
`
`October 1991 to July 1997: The Center for Business Innovation (CBI), President.
`CBI was a minority shareholder in 53 emerging growth companies including
`computer, communications and software businesses. President of a CBI subsidiary, Capital
`for Entrepreneurs, Inc. a venture capital fund financed by the Ewing Marion Kauffman
`Foundation.
`
`September 1994 to 2000: Professor University of Kansas and University of Missouri.
`Taught multi-campus courses in Entrepreneurship & Strategic Management of
`Technology.
`
`December 1986 to October 1989: RasterOps, Inc. Vice President.
`Company was engaged in the development, manufacture and sales of software for
`personal computer display devices.
`
`January 1983 to December 1986:
`
`Personal sabbatical and as a sole proprietor provided consulting services to
`technology firms.
`
`February 1975 to December 1982: EDC, Inc. President.
`Co-Founder of a Kleiner & Perkins venture capital backed company engaged in
`combining computer software technology with environmental improvement devices.
`
`February 1967 to May 1974: Envirotech, Inc. Director Europe.
`A start-up company that grew to $500 million in sales and 5,000 employees in 6
`years. Managed patent portfolio and computer engineering design modeling.
`
`February 1966 to February 1967: Dorr Oliver, Inc.
`A product development position.
`
`
`Education and Awards
`University of Kansas BS Civil Engineering 1960-1964
`University of Kansas MS Environmental Engineering 1964-1966
`California State College Hayward MBA 1968-1972
`Honorary Doctorate DeVry University 1995
`Entrepreneur of the Year Award- sponsored by NASDAQ, Ernst &Young, Kauffman
`Foundation and INC magazine
`Graduate Fellowship Research Award Grant
`University of Connecticut Business School graduate courses
`Berlitz French Immersion School Graduate
`
`
`
`__________________________________________________________________ Page 2
`
`AlmondNet, Inc.
`IPR2022-01064
`Ex. 2003
`Page 2 of 15
`
`
`
`Robert J. Sherwood
`12015 Wenonga Ln, Leawood, Kansas 66209 - 913-269-6589 -
`webtalkwithbob@gmail.com
`________________________________________________________
`Babson College 10th Symposium for Entrepreneurship Educators
`Center for Creative Leadership Graduate University of North Carolina
`Web Developers Boot Camp-Java Scripting and HTML
`Association of Information Technology Professionals
`
`
`Special Appointment
`
`Appointed by Dr. Ken Canfield, running for Kansas Governor, to his campaign
`executive team. I prepared a technology master plan for Kansas that included combining key
`elements from the private, public, and academic sectors, e.g. from the four universities in
`Kansas, to create jobs and provide incentives to keep scientists, technology graduates and
`engineers in Kansas after college. Dr. Canfield was defeated by Kathleen Sebelius.
` Governor Sebelius engaged me to direct a four-person team to visit all four Kansas
`Universities, examine university policies for commercialization of computer and software
`technology, intellectual property ownership, patent, licensing and prepare a report outlining
`specific recommendations to improve the development and transfer of technology from the
`university to the private sector and present the findings to a joint session Kansas congress.
`
`Engagements
`
`Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith LLP
`Engaged as a consultant to perform trial preparation work for Counsel
`in the The Epoch Times Association class action litigation.
`
`Levi & Korsinsky, LLP
`
`Engaged as a consultant to provide expert services on a technology litigation matter.
`
`Winston & Strawn LLP
`
`Engaged to provide expert services for Case No. 2:21-CV-0290-JRG In The United
`States District Court For The Eastern District Of Texas Marshall Division
`
`Russ, August & Kabat
`
`Engaged to provide expert services in connection with patent litigation involving the
`patent portfolio of AlmondNet LLC.
`
`Husch Blackwell LLP
`
`Engaged on behalf of Defendants in the matter of Samantha Cherry v. CoxHealth, In
`the Circuit Court of Greene County, Missouri Case No.: 2031-CC01024.
`
`Davis, Zipperman, Kirschenbaum & Lotito, LLP and Vivid, IP
`
`Engaged on behalf of the Plaintiff in the matter of SwissWatchExpo, Inc., a Georgia
`corporation, Plaintiff, Counterclaim Defendant v. Buyer’s Best Bet, Inc. d/b/a eBestMedia, a
`Georgia corporation, Defendant, Counterclaim Plaintiff, and Lenny Estrin, Defendant v.
`
`__________________________________________________________________ Page 3
`
`AlmondNet, Inc.
`IPR2022-01064
`Ex. 2003
`Page 3 of 15
`
`
`
`Robert J. Sherwood
`12015 Wenonga Ln, Leawood, Kansas 66209 - 913-269-6589 -
`webtalkwithbob@gmail.com
`________________________________________________________
`Eugene Tutunikov, Counterclaim Plaintiff, United States District Court for Northern District
`of Georgia, Atlanta Division, Case No. 1:20-cv-03930-SCJ.
`
`The Rosen Law Firm, P.A.
`
`Engaged on behalf of Plaintiffs in the matter of Zillow Group, Inc. Securities
`Litigation in the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington at
`Seattle, No. 2:-cv-01387-JCC.
`
`Devlin Law Firm, LLC
`
`Engaged on behalf of Plaintiff on litigation matters pertaining to patents owned or
`asserted by Caddo Systems, Inc. and 511 Technologies, Inc. in the matter of Caddo Systems,
`Inc., et al v. Microchip Tech, Inc., 6:20-cv-00245-ADA, Caddo Systems, Inc., et al v. NXP
`USA, Inc. 6:20-cv-0244-ADA.
`
`Holland & Knight LLP
`
`Engaged on behalf of Defendant Web.com Group, Inc. in the matter of Express
`Mobile, Inc. v. Web.com Group, Inc. 3:20-cv-00839. (M.D. Fla., filed Oct. 11, 2010)
`
`Smith, Gambrell & Russell, LLP
`
`Engaged on behalf of Plaintiff Jared Barnett in connection with Plaintiff Jared Barnett
`v Defendant(s) Seth Berkowitz el al., Supreme Court of The State of New York County of
`New York, Index No. 654313/2018. Prepare a rebuttal report and testify at deposition.
`
`Gibson Dunn & Crutcher LLP
`
`Engaged on behalf of AOL Inc., Oath Inc., and Verizon Media Inc. (collectively,
`“AOL” or “Defendants”) in connection with Evox Productions LLC v. AOL Inc., No. 2:20-
`cv-02907-JWH-JEM (C.D. Cal.). Provided expert report and testified at deposition.
`
`Kendall Brill & Kelly, LLP
`
`Engaged on behalf of Plaintiff Villa Real Estate et al v. Pacific Sotheby's Int'l Realty
`et al, Case No. 02-08-21G – 5727. Provided an expert report and testified at a Disciplinary
`Hearing on behalf of Plaintiff Villa Real Estate.
`
`Cozen O'Connor
`
`Engaged on behalf of Plaintiff and Defendant Advanced Engineering Solutions
`Company, LLC versus Personal Corner, LLC. United States District Court Central District
`Of California. Case No.: 2:20-CV-5955-JFW-PLA.
`
`Husch Blackwell
`
`Engaged on behalf of BrandTotal LTD versus Facebook, Inc. United States District
`Court Northern District Of California. Case No. 3:20-CV-07182-JCS
`
`
`__________________________________________________________________ Page 4
`
`AlmondNet, Inc.
`IPR2022-01064
`Ex. 2003
`Page 4 of 15
`
`
`
`Robert J. Sherwood
`12015 Wenonga Ln, Leawood, Kansas 66209 - 913-269-6589 -
`webtalkwithbob@gmail.com
`________________________________________________________
`Liebler, Gonzalez & Portuondo
`
`Engaged on behalf of Defendant to prepare an affirmative expert report, rebuttal
`report and testify at trial. Harte Hanks, Inc., Plaintiff V. Juan Castaneda, Lima Tech Group,
`LLC, and Primus Intellectual Solutions, LLC, In The United States District Court for The
`Southern District Of Florida, Ft. Lauderdale Division Case No. 0:19-CV-62134-
`RAR/Strauss.
`
`Reinhart Boemer Van Deuren, S.C.
`
`Engaged on behalf of Defendant Rise Interactive Media and Analytics, LLC to
`provide expert services in litigation between Sears Hometown and Outlet Stores, Inc. versus
`Rise Interactive Media and Analytics, LLC. Circuit Court Cook County Illinois.
`
`Wang IP Law Group, P.C.
`
`Engaged on behalf of Plaintiff to provide expert services and testify at trial. Dr. Peng
`Holding, Inc. v. Pei-Jun Kuo Case No. BC703529 February 2020.
`
`Blegen & Garvey
`Engaged on behalf of Defendant, Jeffrey Batio. to provide a rebuttal report. Testified
`at trial May 2019. United States District Court For The Northern District Of Illinois United
`States V. Jeffrey Batio 16 Cr 425
`
`Scott D. Owens, P.A. and The Law Offices of Jibrael S. Hindi
`Engaged on behalf of Plaintiff to provide expert services in conjunction with the
`matter of a class action litigation brought by Plaintiff-Bilal Saleh against Defendant-Crunch,
`LLC and Crunch Franchising, LLC and Deliu, LLC collectively (“Defendant”) regarding
`violation of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act, 47 U.S.C § 227, et seq. ("TCPA").
`
`Kaplan Fox & Kilsheimer LLP
`
`Engaged on behalf of Plaintiffs on a class action matter.
`
`Burns and Levinson LLP
`Engaged on behalf of Defendant Internet Brands, Inc., VetNetwork, LLC v. Internet
`Brands, Inc., 15-00044 (D.N.H)
`
`Mayer Brown LLP
`
`Engaged as consultant to Google, Inc. on a Covered Business Method Patent
`Declaration.
`
`Williams & Connolly LLP
`
`__________________________________________________________________ Page 5
`
`AlmondNet, Inc.
`IPR2022-01064
`Ex. 2003
`Page 5 of 15
`
`
`
`Robert J. Sherwood
`12015 Wenonga Ln, Leawood, Kansas 66209 - 913-269-6589 -
`webtalkwithbob@gmail.com
`________________________________________________________
`
`Rockstar Consortium US LP and Netstar Technologies LLC v. Google, Inc. A patent
`infringement matter regarding U.S. Patent Nos. 6,098,065; 7,236,969; 7,469,245; 7,672,970;
`7,895,178; 7,895,183; 7,933,883 relating to search engines. Engaged on behalf of Google,
`Inc.
`
`Cooley Godward Kronish LLP
`Christina Egner and Rickey Glasco v. Sony Electronics, Inc. A class action lawsuit
`brought against Sony in the United States District Court Southern District of California, Case
`No. AJB 09cv2109 AJB (MDD). Engaged on behalf of Sony to prepare an expert report on
`computer laptop failure rates.
`
`Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton
`
`Branch Banking and Trust Company - EMG Technologies, LLC - Invalidity Analysis
`and Covered Business Method Review No. 2. The patent at issue is U.S. Patent No.
`7,441,196 relating to e-commerce, using the World Wide Web to display advertisements and
`accepting user inputs to navigate commercial Websites. The subject matter includes well-
`known components such as hyperlinks, mark-up languages, navigation interfaces, and
`selectable inputs. Provided expert declaration on behalf of Branch Banking and Trust
`Company in support of CBM.
`
`Fitch, Even, Tabin & Flannery LLP
`A patent infringement action for plaintiff’s United States Patent No. 7,054,830
`entitled “System and Method for Incentive Programs and Award Fulfillment” Kroy IP
`Holdings, LLC v. Safeway, Inc., Case No. 2:12-cv-00800 (E.D. Tex.), and Kroy IP Holdings,
`LLC v. The Kroger Co., Case No. 2:13-cv-00141 (E.D. Tex.). Provided two infringement
`reports, declarations, deposition and a validity report on behalf of plaintiff Kroy IP Holdings,
`LLC.
`
`Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton
`
`Branch Banking and Trust Company - EMG Technologies, LLC - Invalidity Analysis
`and Covered Business Method Review. The patent at issue is U.S. Patent No. 7,441,196
`relating to e-commerce, using the World Wide Web to display advertisements and accepting
`user inputs to navigate commercial Websites. The subject matter includes well-known
`components such as hyperlinks, mark-up languages, navigation interfaces, and selectable
`inputs. Provided expert declaration on behalf of Branch Banking and Trust Company in
`support of CBM.
`
`Arent Fox
`Tre Milano, LLC vs. Amazon.com, Inc., Case No.: BC 460511, Superior Court of the
`State of California County of Los Angeles, Central District. Engaged by Amazon to opine on
`issues surrounding the impact of customer reviews on retail and on-line sales of a consumer
`product.
`
`__________________________________________________________________ Page 6
`
`AlmondNet, Inc.
`IPR2022-01064
`Ex. 2003
`Page 6 of 15
`
`
`
`Robert J. Sherwood
`12015 Wenonga Ln, Leawood, Kansas 66209 - 913-269-6589 -
`webtalkwithbob@gmail.com
`________________________________________________________
`
`Girard Gibbs LLP & Kaplan Fox & Kilsheimer LLP
`
`Engaged as a consultant on behalf of Plaintiffs on a class action matter. Yahoo!, Inc. is
`the defendant. Examined terms of service, wiretapping issues, user profiling related patents,
`targeted advertising methods, user interest mathematical modeling techniques and email
`delivery technologies.
`
`Cooley LLP
`
`B.E.Technology, LLC v. Facebook, Inc U.S. Patent No. 6,628,314 Computer Interface
`Method and Apparatus with Targeted Advertising. Engaged to provide declaration in support
`of Facebook, Inc. Petition for IPR, invalidity report and non-infringement report.
`
`Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein and Fox P.L.L.C.
`
`A Google Petition for a Covered Business Method proceeding before the United
`States Patent and Trademark Office involving U.S. Patent No. 7,441,196 owned by EMG
`Technologies. Engaged to provide a declaration and deposition in support of Google’s
`Petition.
`
`Foley & Lardner LLP
`
`Robocast, Inc. v. Apple, Inc. (1:11-cv-00235; USDC DE); Robocast, Inc. v.
`Microsoft, Corporation (1:10-cv-01055; USDC - DE). Engaged by Robocast to provide
`expert report on advertising methods and measurement analytics, deposition and trial
`testimony.
`
`Keker & Van Nest, LLP
`
`Suffolk Technologies, Inc. v. AOL Inc. and Google, Inc. U.S. Patent No. 6,081,835,
`An Internet Server and a Method of Controlling an Internet Server, issued June 27, 2000.
`Case No. 1:12-CV-625-TSE-IDD, in the United States District Court for the Eastern District
`of Virginia Alexandria Division. Engaged to provide infringement rebuttal report, deposition
`and trial on behalf of Google.
`
`Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati, P.C.
`
`General Electric Company vs. Kontera Technologies, Inc. Case No. 1:12-cv-00525-
`LPS. U.S. Patent No. 6,902,074 and U.S. Patent No. 6,581,065, Dynamic Insertion and
`Updating of Hypertext Links for Internet Servers. Engaged to provide declaration in support
`of Kontera Technologies, Inc. Petition for IPR, invalidity report and non-infringement report.
`
`Heller Ehrman White & McAuliffe
`Overture Services, Inc. (Yahoo!) v. FindWhat.com. Case No. SACV 03-00685 (CJC)
`(EX). The lawsuit charged FindWhat.com with infringement of Yahoo! U.S. Patent No.
`6,269,361, System and Method for Influencing a Position on a Search Result List Generated
`by a Computer Network Search Engine (the '361 Patent). The '361 Patent covers various
`
`__________________________________________________________________ Page 7
`
`AlmondNet, Inc.
`IPR2022-01064
`Ex. 2003
`Page 7 of 15
`
`
`
`Robert J. Sherwood
`12015 Wenonga Ln, Leawood, Kansas 66209 - 913-269-6589 -
`webtalkwithbob@gmail.com
`________________________________________________________
`advertising methods relating to bid-for-placement product and pay-per-click performance
`technologies. Engaged by Yahoo!, Inc. to provide expert report on Secondary
`Considerations, deposition and trial testimony.
`
`Vinson & Elkins, McDermott Will & Emery, Fulbright and Jaworski
`Orion IP, LLC v. Staples et al. (Harley Davidson, Toyota, and Home Depot) Civil
`Action No. 2:04-CV-297 (LED). Orion IP asserted U.S. Patent No. 5,367,627 Computer
`Assisted Parts Sales Method and U.S. Patent No. 5,615,342, Electronic Proposal Preparation
`System.
`Engaged to examine intellectual property valuation based on two patents, alternative
`cost issues surrounding the implementation of non-infringing substitute computer-based
`methods for the ‘342 and ‘627 patent, estimating non-infringing substitutes, estimate
`hypothetical negotiation licensee fees, examine patent invalidity based on prior art, Website
`analysis, valuation of custom designed software and custom and practice issues associated
`with intellectual property licensing fees. Engaged by Defendants to provide expert report and
`deposition.
`
`Shughart Thomson & Kilroy
`
`Emergis Technologies, Inc., f/k/a BCE Emergis Technologies, Inc. v. Kansas City
`Power & Light Co., in the United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri
`Kansas City Division, Civil Action No. 06-0201-CV-W-REL.
`
`Emergis filed suit against KCP&L alleging infringement of a patent, entitled
`“Electronic Invoicing and Payment System” U.S. Patent No. 6,044,362 (“the '362 Patent”)
`and seeking unspecified monetary damages and injunctive relief. This patent relates to
`automated electronic bill presentment and payment systems, particularly those involving
`Internet billing and collection. Engaged to estimate a non-infringing substitute, establish a
`license fee based on hypothetical negotiation, examine license agreement for conformance to
`specifications and software distribution rights. Engaged by defendant. Prepared expert report.
`
`Arnold & Porter LLP and Norris Keplinger & Logan LLP
`CSU, Inc. v. Xerox, Inc. In 1994, CSU filed suit against Xerox, alleging that Xerox
`violated the Sherman Antitrust Act by monopolizing the market for high speed copiers. The
`central issue was whether a unilateral refusal to license or sell intellectual property protected
`by patent or copyright is absolutely immune from a claim of monopolization and attempted
`monopolization under Section 2 of the Sherman Antitrust Act. Xerox counter claimed for
`patent and copyright infringement.
`
`Engaged to analyze the CSU $20 million business and determine if CSU would have
`grown to $100 million, but for Xerox’s refusal to sell CSU a patented product. Examined all
`documents such as financials, bank loans, management, business plans, capital formation
`documents and board decisions. Expert report, trial preparation and deposition on behalf of
`Xerox, Inc.
`
`
`__________________________________________________________________ Page 8
`
`AlmondNet, Inc.
`IPR2022-01064
`Ex. 2003
`Page 8 of 15
`
`
`
`Robert J. Sherwood
`12015 Wenonga Ln, Leawood, Kansas 66209 - 913-269-6589 -
`webtalkwithbob@gmail.com
`________________________________________________________
`Allen Dell, P.A.
`
`Accusoft Corporation f/k/a Pegasus Imaging Corporation v. John P. Reinhart, Jeffrey
`D. Amrein, Allscripts-Misys Healthcare Solutions, Inc. f/k/a Allscripts Healthcare Solutions,
`Inc. and AllscriptsMisys, LLC f/k/a Misys Healthcare Systems, LLC and successor by
`merger to Allscripts, LLC. In the Circuit Court of the Thirteenth Judicial Circuit in and for
`Hillsborough County, Florida Complex Business Litigation Division, Case No. 10-CA-
`018238 Division L. Engaged to provide expert report, deposition and trial on behalf of
`Pegasus Imaging Corporation.
`
`Farella Braun + Martel LLP
`
`Brandgenuity LLC Plaintiff v. Zynga Inc., f/k/a Zynga Game Network, Inc. In the
`Superior Court of the State of California in and for the County of San Francisco, Case No.
`CGC-12-520738 Engaged on behalf of Zynga. Plaintiff claims they supplied services to
`Zynga, for which Zynga refused to pay Plaintiff a $18 million commission for a licensing
`agreement for the use of Zynga brand names, such as Farmville. Provided analysis and
`examination on custom and practices in the brand licensing industry including agency fee
`schedules, royalty rates, license agreements, integration clauses and agency agreements.
`Engaged to provide expert report, deposition and trial.
`
`Law Office of Mick Lerner, PA and Stinson, Mag & Fizzell
`4th Trimester v. Reed Publishing, et al. Determine the value of a technology business.
`Expert report, deposition and testify at Arbitration for defendant.
`
`Thelen Reid & Priest LLP
`DJ&J Software Corporation dba Egghead Software and Elecom Corporation v. Casahl
`Technology, Inc. Examine sales of software from a reseller, but for developer’s refusal to
`supply current versions, ability of distributor to manage software through normal sales
`channels, value of software and quantity that would have been sold, but for software
`developer’s actions. Expert report and deposition for plaintiff.
`
`Ascano & Campo LLP
`Silicon Valley IPO Network et al. v. Kevin Von Poppen et al. Determine business value
`of video compression software had venture capital firm invested in startup and provided initial
`funding. Expert report for plaintiff.
`
`Morrison & Hecker LLP
`Universal Business Computing Company, Inc. and Ken Garen v. Global Enterprise
`Solutions, Inc. and Brian Unger. Determine value of founders equity share in the business had
`the founders had an agreement in writing for equity ownership, determine share price and
`actual total share ownership under premature departure of one of the cofounders. Expert report,
`deposition and testify at Arbitration for defendant.
`
`
`__________________________________________________________________ Page 9
`
`AlmondNet, Inc.
`IPR2022-01064
`Ex. 2003
`Page 9 of 15
`
`
`
`Robert J. Sherwood
`12015 Wenonga Ln, Leawood, Kansas 66209 - 913-269-6589 -
`webtalkwithbob@gmail.com
`________________________________________________________
`Steefel Levitt & Weiss
`Examine license agreement and software for conformance to contract specifications for
`functionality and use. Expert report and deposition.
`
`Grey Cary Friedenrich
`Examine license agreement for computer hardware and software for conformance to
`contract specifications for functionality and use. Consultant for plaintiff.
`
`Cooley Godward LLP
`Examine license agreement and software for conformance to contract specifications for
`functionality and use. Consultant.
`
`Michael Best & Friedrich
`Examine Websites for duplication of code and ownership of various software Website
`commerce and affiliate development components. Expert report for defendant.
`
`Cotton & Gundzik LLP
`Digital Insight v. HNC Software. Examine co-branding, OEM relationship, software
`customization, licensing of Website and business loss due to inappropriate distribution of
`Website software. Examine license agreement for conformance to specifications and software
`distribution rights. Expert report for plaintiff.
`
`Crosby Heafey Roach & Smith
`
`Raytheon Company vs. Webgear, Inc. & Ted Cooper, Case No. V-020232-9 Superior
`Court of California County of Alameda. Examine license agreement for conformance to
`specifications, verification of computer hardware and software documentation instructions,
`verification of software and wireless computer product use and determine value of software.
`Expert report for plaintiff.
`
`Howrey Simon Arnold & White LLP
`Business Management Systems Corporation v. Cable & Wireless USA, Inc. Civil
`Action No. 00-B-1069 United States District Court. Examine software best practices of
`enterprise software developer and methods of measuring license requirements, measurement
`data, and verification of software use, functionality and conformance with contract purchase
`development specifications. Examine license agreement for conformance to specifications and
`software distribution rights. Expert report, deposition and testified at trial for defendant.
`
`Mannatt Phelps & Phillips LLC
`Verity, Inc. v. Broadvision, Inc. Case No. C01-20501 RMW (PVT) ADR United States
`District Court for the Northern District of California San Jose Division. Examine license
`agreement and software for conformance to specifications, analyze customer software
`purchase levels for various levels of product upgrades, determine the number of customers that
`
`__________________________________________________________________ Page 10
`
`AlmondNet, Inc.
`IPR2022-01064
`Ex. 2003
`Page 10 of 15
`
`
`
`Robert J. Sherwood
`12015 Wenonga Ln, Leawood, Kansas 66209 - 913-269-6589 -
`webtalkwithbob@gmail.com
`________________________________________________________
`would have upgraded, but for the licensee’s inappropriate software distribution. Expert report,
`deposition and testified at Arbitration for plaintiff.
`
`Schlagel Damore & Gordon
`Determine value of enterprise software to licensor where licensee had developed a
`derivative product, examine business history, development and reproduction costs. Expert
`report and deposition for plaintiff. Examine license agreement for conformance to
`specifications and software distribution rights.
`
`Crosby Heafey Roach & Smith
`Examine license agreement for conformance to specifications and software distribution
`rights. Expert report for defendant.
`
`America On-Line Corporate Counsel
`
`Investigate the methods that might be used to establish comparative market values for
`email addresses and to indicate possible economic benchmarks. Civil suit regarding stolen
`email addresses and damages resulting from spamming. Consultant to AOL.
`
`Boies, Schiller & Flexner LLP
`
`The SCO Group Inc. vs. International Business Machines Corporation United States
`District Court, District of Utah, Case No. 03-CV-0294. Examine license agreements for
`derivative product rights, best practices with respect to derivative products, conformance to
`license agreement specifications for software development, use and distribution. Expert
`report for plaintiff.
`
`Law Offices of Jeffery P. Widman
`SunLan Corporation vs. Zenith Infotech, Inc. Case No. 04CC02648 Superior Court of
`California, County of Orange. Examine issues relating to sale of goods, distributor revenue
`sharing and pricing with respect to industry practices for computer hardware and software,
`OEM licensing and distribution agreements. Examine license agreement for conformance to
`specifications and software copy distribution rights. Expert report and deposition for
`defendant.
`
`Chan Law Group
`Perfumebay.Com, Inc. vs. EBAY, Inc., Case No.: CV04-1358 WDK (SSx) United
`States District Court for the Central District of California. Examine issue surrounding the use
`of trade names in a domain name including search return listings. Expert report for plaintiff.
`
`Latham & Watkins LLP
`Itech Group, Inc. v. National Semiconductor Corporation. Case No. CV 810872
`Superior Court of the State of California County of Santa Clara. Examine source code and
`
`__________________________________________________________________ Page 11
`
`AlmondNet, Inc.
`IPR2022-01064
`Ex. 2003
`Page 11 of 15
`
`
`
`Robert J. Sherwood
`12015 Wenonga Ln, Leawood, Kansas 66209 - 913-269-6589 -
`webtalkwithbob@gmail.com
`________________________________________________________
`object code license agreements and investment letters of intent surrounding a software
`licensing dispute. Expert report, deposition and testified at jury trial for defendant.
`
`Latham & Watkins LLP
`GR Match LLC v. Market Range LLC, et al. AAA Case Number 75-181-Y-00067-
`06. Examine issues relating to Website tracking methodologies for sponsored ads, natural
`search returns, advertising, customer life time value and affiliate tracking. Expert report and
`deposition for plaintiff.
`
`Capobianco and Bram, LLP
`Dovebid, Inc. v. eBay Inc., United States District Court for the Central District of
`California. Consultant for plaintiff.
`
`Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP
`Viewsonic Corporation vs. AmTran Technology Co., Ltd. United States District
`Court, Central District of California Case No. CV 05-5864 GAF (RZx). Expert report for
`defendant.
`
`Mayer, Brown, Rowe & Maw LLP
`
`Positive Ions, Inc. v. ION Media Networks, Inc. United States District Court
`Central District of California Case No. CV 06-4296 ABC (FFMx). Expert reports for
`defendant and counter claimant.
`
`Needham, Davis, Kepner & Young, LLP
`
`Ecompare v. Priceline.com. Engaged as a consultant for plaintiff in trade secret
`matter.
`
`Farella Braun + Martel LLP
`
`Securities and Exchange Commission v. Mark Leslie, United States District Court
`Northern District of California San Jose Division, Civil Action No. C 07-3444 JF. Engaged
`as expert witness for defendant. Expert report and deposition.
`
`Allen Dell, P.A.
`
`Pegasus Imaging Corporation v. Northrop Grumman Corporation et al., In the United
`States District Court, Middle District of Florida, Tampa Division Case No. 8:07-cv-01937.
`Engaged by Plaintiff. Examine license agreement for conformance to specifications and
`software copy distribution rights. Provided Expert report, deposition, trial assistance. The
`matter concerned a software developer kit license interpretation, software development best
`practices, software deployment methods, runtime analysis, and derivative product issues.
`
`Nelson& Weinkauf
`
`__________________________________________________________________ Page 12
`
`AlmondNet, Inc.
`IPR2022-01064
`Ex. 2003
`Page 12 of 15
`
`
`
`Robert J. Sherwood
`12015 Wenonga Ln, Leawood, Kansas 66209 - 913-269-6589 -
`webtalkwithbob@gmail.com
`________________________________________________________
`
`Trancos, Inc. dba Coregmedia vs. Brian Harley, Tallac Ventures, Inc., dba
`Tallacmedia.com and dba Leadshot, Superior Court of California, County of San Mateo-Case
`No. CIV-492361. Engaged by Plaintiff. Provided expert analysis and deposition assistance.
`The matter concerned trade secret misappropriation, breach of employment contract, Internet
`advertising, lead generation, affiliate tracking, and Website development and deployment.
`
`Nixon Peabody LLP
`
`Serena Software, Inc. v. Con-Way Inc. Case No. CIV 491585. Engaged by
`Defendant. Expert report. Examine license agreement for conformance to specifications and
`software copy distribution rights. Plaintiff contends that defendant breeched a license
`agreement. Further that because of this