throbber
Robert J. Sherwood
`12015 Wenonga Ln, Leawood, Kansas 66209 - 913-269-6589 -
`webtalkwithbob@gmail.com
`________________________________________________________
`Technology Experience
`Mr. Sherwood is a consultant and expert witness to the legal community on matters
`relating to computing devices, software applications and Internet advertising.
`Mr. Sherwood has testified, and is qualified by education, training, experience or
`occupation, as an expert, on the following matters: IP address server analysis and extraction,
`search engine ranking methods, HTML and XML code analysis, robot analysis, subscription
`based user and affiliate systems, subscription based systems for social networking, CPM
`advertising, venture capital portfolio analysis, click thru rates, key word selection techniques,
`co-branding, merchant selection and analysis for mobile and desktop devices, database
`development and population, Google Local or Places, SEM campaigns, exclusivity content
`sharing agreements, mobile device applications, click thru conversion rates, affiliate
`agreements, revenue sharing and tracking analytics, application software with any text to
`speech or speech to text software, unauthorized use of names, false advertising, unfair
`competition, business valuation, intellectual property, term sheets and patent value, trade
`secret misappropriation, breach of employment contracts, Internet advertising, lead
`generation, affiliate tracking, Website development and deployment, software developer kit
`license interpretation, software development best practices, software deployment methods,
`runtime analysis, derivative product issues, intellectual property valuation based on patents,
`Website analysis, valuation of custom designed software, custom and practice issues
`associated with intellectual property licensing fees, source code and object code license
`agreements, investment letters of intent, secondary considerations for establishing patent
`validity, software best practices for enterprise software development, methods of measuring
`license use, measurement data, verification of software use, functionality and conformance
`with contract development specifications, derivative product rights, best practices with
`respect to derivative products, conformance to license agreement specifications for software
`development, use and distribution.
`
`Experience
`Consultant to business and expert witness to the legal community on matters relating
`to computing devices, business startups, licenses, software development and Internet
`advertising.
`
`Employment History
`
`2016 to Now: Formerly President and currently Chairman of the Board of Directors of
`Identimap, Inc.
`The company develops human resource management software.
`
`July 1996 to March 2015: SmartText Corporation, President.
`
`__________________________________________________________________ Page 1
`
`AlmondNet, Inc.
`IPR2022-01064
`Ex. 2003
`Page 1 of 15
`
`

`

`Robert J. Sherwood
`12015 Wenonga Ln, Leawood, Kansas 66209 - 913-269-6589 -
`webtalkwithbob@gmail.com
`________________________________________________________
`The company developed and licensed specialized software applications under the title
`LegalPoint. The company has no current licenses.
`
`October 1991 to July 1997: The Center for Business Innovation (CBI), President.
`CBI was a minority shareholder in 53 emerging growth companies including
`computer, communications and software businesses. President of a CBI subsidiary, Capital
`for Entrepreneurs, Inc. a venture capital fund financed by the Ewing Marion Kauffman
`Foundation.
`
`September 1994 to 2000: Professor University of Kansas and University of Missouri.
`Taught multi-campus courses in Entrepreneurship & Strategic Management of
`Technology.
`
`December 1986 to October 1989: RasterOps, Inc. Vice President.
`Company was engaged in the development, manufacture and sales of software for
`personal computer display devices.
`
`January 1983 to December 1986:
`
`Personal sabbatical and as a sole proprietor provided consulting services to
`technology firms.
`
`February 1975 to December 1982: EDC, Inc. President.
`Co-Founder of a Kleiner & Perkins venture capital backed company engaged in
`combining computer software technology with environmental improvement devices.
`
`February 1967 to May 1974: Envirotech, Inc. Director Europe.
`A start-up company that grew to $500 million in sales and 5,000 employees in 6
`years. Managed patent portfolio and computer engineering design modeling.
`
`February 1966 to February 1967: Dorr Oliver, Inc.
`A product development position.
`
`
`Education and Awards
`University of Kansas BS Civil Engineering 1960-1964
`University of Kansas MS Environmental Engineering 1964-1966
`California State College Hayward MBA 1968-1972
`Honorary Doctorate DeVry University 1995
`Entrepreneur of the Year Award- sponsored by NASDAQ, Ernst &Young, Kauffman
`Foundation and INC magazine
`Graduate Fellowship Research Award Grant
`University of Connecticut Business School graduate courses
`Berlitz French Immersion School Graduate
`
`
`
`__________________________________________________________________ Page 2
`
`AlmondNet, Inc.
`IPR2022-01064
`Ex. 2003
`Page 2 of 15
`
`

`

`Robert J. Sherwood
`12015 Wenonga Ln, Leawood, Kansas 66209 - 913-269-6589 -
`webtalkwithbob@gmail.com
`________________________________________________________
`Babson College 10th Symposium for Entrepreneurship Educators
`Center for Creative Leadership Graduate University of North Carolina
`Web Developers Boot Camp-Java Scripting and HTML
`Association of Information Technology Professionals
`
`
`Special Appointment
`
`Appointed by Dr. Ken Canfield, running for Kansas Governor, to his campaign
`executive team. I prepared a technology master plan for Kansas that included combining key
`elements from the private, public, and academic sectors, e.g. from the four universities in
`Kansas, to create jobs and provide incentives to keep scientists, technology graduates and
`engineers in Kansas after college. Dr. Canfield was defeated by Kathleen Sebelius.
` Governor Sebelius engaged me to direct a four-person team to visit all four Kansas
`Universities, examine university policies for commercialization of computer and software
`technology, intellectual property ownership, patent, licensing and prepare a report outlining
`specific recommendations to improve the development and transfer of technology from the
`university to the private sector and present the findings to a joint session Kansas congress.
`
`Engagements
`
`Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith LLP
`Engaged as a consultant to perform trial preparation work for Counsel
`in the The Epoch Times Association class action litigation.
`
`Levi & Korsinsky, LLP
`
`Engaged as a consultant to provide expert services on a technology litigation matter.
`
`Winston & Strawn LLP
`
`Engaged to provide expert services for Case No. 2:21-CV-0290-JRG In The United
`States District Court For The Eastern District Of Texas Marshall Division
`
`Russ, August & Kabat
`
`Engaged to provide expert services in connection with patent litigation involving the
`patent portfolio of AlmondNet LLC.
`
`Husch Blackwell LLP
`
`Engaged on behalf of Defendants in the matter of Samantha Cherry v. CoxHealth, In
`the Circuit Court of Greene County, Missouri Case No.: 2031-CC01024.
`
`Davis, Zipperman, Kirschenbaum & Lotito, LLP and Vivid, IP
`
`Engaged on behalf of the Plaintiff in the matter of SwissWatchExpo, Inc., a Georgia
`corporation, Plaintiff, Counterclaim Defendant v. Buyer’s Best Bet, Inc. d/b/a eBestMedia, a
`Georgia corporation, Defendant, Counterclaim Plaintiff, and Lenny Estrin, Defendant v.
`
`__________________________________________________________________ Page 3
`
`AlmondNet, Inc.
`IPR2022-01064
`Ex. 2003
`Page 3 of 15
`
`

`

`Robert J. Sherwood
`12015 Wenonga Ln, Leawood, Kansas 66209 - 913-269-6589 -
`webtalkwithbob@gmail.com
`________________________________________________________
`Eugene Tutunikov, Counterclaim Plaintiff, United States District Court for Northern District
`of Georgia, Atlanta Division, Case No. 1:20-cv-03930-SCJ.
`
`The Rosen Law Firm, P.A.
`
`Engaged on behalf of Plaintiffs in the matter of Zillow Group, Inc. Securities
`Litigation in the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington at
`Seattle, No. 2:-cv-01387-JCC.
`
`Devlin Law Firm, LLC
`
`Engaged on behalf of Plaintiff on litigation matters pertaining to patents owned or
`asserted by Caddo Systems, Inc. and 511 Technologies, Inc. in the matter of Caddo Systems,
`Inc., et al v. Microchip Tech, Inc., 6:20-cv-00245-ADA, Caddo Systems, Inc., et al v. NXP
`USA, Inc. 6:20-cv-0244-ADA.
`
`Holland & Knight LLP
`
`Engaged on behalf of Defendant Web.com Group, Inc. in the matter of Express
`Mobile, Inc. v. Web.com Group, Inc. 3:20-cv-00839. (M.D. Fla., filed Oct. 11, 2010)
`
`Smith, Gambrell & Russell, LLP
`
`Engaged on behalf of Plaintiff Jared Barnett in connection with Plaintiff Jared Barnett
`v Defendant(s) Seth Berkowitz el al., Supreme Court of The State of New York County of
`New York, Index No. 654313/2018. Prepare a rebuttal report and testify at deposition.
`
`Gibson Dunn & Crutcher LLP
`
`Engaged on behalf of AOL Inc., Oath Inc., and Verizon Media Inc. (collectively,
`“AOL” or “Defendants”) in connection with Evox Productions LLC v. AOL Inc., No. 2:20-
`cv-02907-JWH-JEM (C.D. Cal.). Provided expert report and testified at deposition.
`
`Kendall Brill & Kelly, LLP
`
`Engaged on behalf of Plaintiff Villa Real Estate et al v. Pacific Sotheby's Int'l Realty
`et al, Case No. 02-08-21G – 5727. Provided an expert report and testified at a Disciplinary
`Hearing on behalf of Plaintiff Villa Real Estate.
`
`Cozen O'Connor
`
`Engaged on behalf of Plaintiff and Defendant Advanced Engineering Solutions
`Company, LLC versus Personal Corner, LLC. United States District Court Central District
`Of California. Case No.: 2:20-CV-5955-JFW-PLA.
`
`Husch Blackwell
`
`Engaged on behalf of BrandTotal LTD versus Facebook, Inc. United States District
`Court Northern District Of California. Case No. 3:20-CV-07182-JCS
`
`
`__________________________________________________________________ Page 4
`
`AlmondNet, Inc.
`IPR2022-01064
`Ex. 2003
`Page 4 of 15
`
`

`

`Robert J. Sherwood
`12015 Wenonga Ln, Leawood, Kansas 66209 - 913-269-6589 -
`webtalkwithbob@gmail.com
`________________________________________________________
`Liebler, Gonzalez & Portuondo
`
`Engaged on behalf of Defendant to prepare an affirmative expert report, rebuttal
`report and testify at trial. Harte Hanks, Inc., Plaintiff V. Juan Castaneda, Lima Tech Group,
`LLC, and Primus Intellectual Solutions, LLC, In The United States District Court for The
`Southern District Of Florida, Ft. Lauderdale Division Case No. 0:19-CV-62134-
`RAR/Strauss.
`
`Reinhart Boemer Van Deuren, S.C.
`
`Engaged on behalf of Defendant Rise Interactive Media and Analytics, LLC to
`provide expert services in litigation between Sears Hometown and Outlet Stores, Inc. versus
`Rise Interactive Media and Analytics, LLC. Circuit Court Cook County Illinois.
`
`Wang IP Law Group, P.C.
`
`Engaged on behalf of Plaintiff to provide expert services and testify at trial. Dr. Peng
`Holding, Inc. v. Pei-Jun Kuo Case No. BC703529 February 2020.
`
`Blegen & Garvey
`Engaged on behalf of Defendant, Jeffrey Batio. to provide a rebuttal report. Testified
`at trial May 2019. United States District Court For The Northern District Of Illinois United
`States V. Jeffrey Batio 16 Cr 425
`
`Scott D. Owens, P.A. and The Law Offices of Jibrael S. Hindi
`Engaged on behalf of Plaintiff to provide expert services in conjunction with the
`matter of a class action litigation brought by Plaintiff-Bilal Saleh against Defendant-Crunch,
`LLC and Crunch Franchising, LLC and Deliu, LLC collectively (“Defendant”) regarding
`violation of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act, 47 U.S.C § 227, et seq. ("TCPA").
`
`Kaplan Fox & Kilsheimer LLP
`
`Engaged on behalf of Plaintiffs on a class action matter.
`
`Burns and Levinson LLP
`Engaged on behalf of Defendant Internet Brands, Inc., VetNetwork, LLC v. Internet
`Brands, Inc., 15-00044 (D.N.H)
`
`Mayer Brown LLP
`
`Engaged as consultant to Google, Inc. on a Covered Business Method Patent
`Declaration.
`
`Williams & Connolly LLP
`
`__________________________________________________________________ Page 5
`
`AlmondNet, Inc.
`IPR2022-01064
`Ex. 2003
`Page 5 of 15
`
`

`

`Robert J. Sherwood
`12015 Wenonga Ln, Leawood, Kansas 66209 - 913-269-6589 -
`webtalkwithbob@gmail.com
`________________________________________________________
`
`Rockstar Consortium US LP and Netstar Technologies LLC v. Google, Inc. A patent
`infringement matter regarding U.S. Patent Nos. 6,098,065; 7,236,969; 7,469,245; 7,672,970;
`7,895,178; 7,895,183; 7,933,883 relating to search engines. Engaged on behalf of Google,
`Inc.
`
`Cooley Godward Kronish LLP
`Christina Egner and Rickey Glasco v. Sony Electronics, Inc. A class action lawsuit
`brought against Sony in the United States District Court Southern District of California, Case
`No. AJB 09cv2109 AJB (MDD). Engaged on behalf of Sony to prepare an expert report on
`computer laptop failure rates.
`
`Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton
`
`Branch Banking and Trust Company - EMG Technologies, LLC - Invalidity Analysis
`and Covered Business Method Review No. 2. The patent at issue is U.S. Patent No.
`7,441,196 relating to e-commerce, using the World Wide Web to display advertisements and
`accepting user inputs to navigate commercial Websites. The subject matter includes well-
`known components such as hyperlinks, mark-up languages, navigation interfaces, and
`selectable inputs. Provided expert declaration on behalf of Branch Banking and Trust
`Company in support of CBM.
`
`Fitch, Even, Tabin & Flannery LLP
`A patent infringement action for plaintiff’s United States Patent No. 7,054,830
`entitled “System and Method for Incentive Programs and Award Fulfillment” Kroy IP
`Holdings, LLC v. Safeway, Inc., Case No. 2:12-cv-00800 (E.D. Tex.), and Kroy IP Holdings,
`LLC v. The Kroger Co., Case No. 2:13-cv-00141 (E.D. Tex.). Provided two infringement
`reports, declarations, deposition and a validity report on behalf of plaintiff Kroy IP Holdings,
`LLC.
`
`Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton
`
`Branch Banking and Trust Company - EMG Technologies, LLC - Invalidity Analysis
`and Covered Business Method Review. The patent at issue is U.S. Patent No. 7,441,196
`relating to e-commerce, using the World Wide Web to display advertisements and accepting
`user inputs to navigate commercial Websites. The subject matter includes well-known
`components such as hyperlinks, mark-up languages, navigation interfaces, and selectable
`inputs. Provided expert declaration on behalf of Branch Banking and Trust Company in
`support of CBM.
`
`Arent Fox
`Tre Milano, LLC vs. Amazon.com, Inc., Case No.: BC 460511, Superior Court of the
`State of California County of Los Angeles, Central District. Engaged by Amazon to opine on
`issues surrounding the impact of customer reviews on retail and on-line sales of a consumer
`product.
`
`__________________________________________________________________ Page 6
`
`AlmondNet, Inc.
`IPR2022-01064
`Ex. 2003
`Page 6 of 15
`
`

`

`Robert J. Sherwood
`12015 Wenonga Ln, Leawood, Kansas 66209 - 913-269-6589 -
`webtalkwithbob@gmail.com
`________________________________________________________
`
`Girard Gibbs LLP & Kaplan Fox & Kilsheimer LLP
`
`Engaged as a consultant on behalf of Plaintiffs on a class action matter. Yahoo!, Inc. is
`the defendant. Examined terms of service, wiretapping issues, user profiling related patents,
`targeted advertising methods, user interest mathematical modeling techniques and email
`delivery technologies.
`
`Cooley LLP
`
`B.E.Technology, LLC v. Facebook, Inc U.S. Patent No. 6,628,314 Computer Interface
`Method and Apparatus with Targeted Advertising. Engaged to provide declaration in support
`of Facebook, Inc. Petition for IPR, invalidity report and non-infringement report.
`
`Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein and Fox P.L.L.C.
`
`A Google Petition for a Covered Business Method proceeding before the United
`States Patent and Trademark Office involving U.S. Patent No. 7,441,196 owned by EMG
`Technologies. Engaged to provide a declaration and deposition in support of Google’s
`Petition.
`
`Foley & Lardner LLP
`
`Robocast, Inc. v. Apple, Inc. (1:11-cv-00235; USDC DE); Robocast, Inc. v.
`Microsoft, Corporation (1:10-cv-01055; USDC - DE). Engaged by Robocast to provide
`expert report on advertising methods and measurement analytics, deposition and trial
`testimony.
`
`Keker & Van Nest, LLP
`
`Suffolk Technologies, Inc. v. AOL Inc. and Google, Inc. U.S. Patent No. 6,081,835,
`An Internet Server and a Method of Controlling an Internet Server, issued June 27, 2000.
`Case No. 1:12-CV-625-TSE-IDD, in the United States District Court for the Eastern District
`of Virginia Alexandria Division. Engaged to provide infringement rebuttal report, deposition
`and trial on behalf of Google.
`
`Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati, P.C.
`
`General Electric Company vs. Kontera Technologies, Inc. Case No. 1:12-cv-00525-
`LPS. U.S. Patent No. 6,902,074 and U.S. Patent No. 6,581,065, Dynamic Insertion and
`Updating of Hypertext Links for Internet Servers. Engaged to provide declaration in support
`of Kontera Technologies, Inc. Petition for IPR, invalidity report and non-infringement report.
`
`Heller Ehrman White & McAuliffe
`Overture Services, Inc. (Yahoo!) v. FindWhat.com. Case No. SACV 03-00685 (CJC)
`(EX). The lawsuit charged FindWhat.com with infringement of Yahoo! U.S. Patent No.
`6,269,361, System and Method for Influencing a Position on a Search Result List Generated
`by a Computer Network Search Engine (the '361 Patent). The '361 Patent covers various
`
`__________________________________________________________________ Page 7
`
`AlmondNet, Inc.
`IPR2022-01064
`Ex. 2003
`Page 7 of 15
`
`

`

`Robert J. Sherwood
`12015 Wenonga Ln, Leawood, Kansas 66209 - 913-269-6589 -
`webtalkwithbob@gmail.com
`________________________________________________________
`advertising methods relating to bid-for-placement product and pay-per-click performance
`technologies. Engaged by Yahoo!, Inc. to provide expert report on Secondary
`Considerations, deposition and trial testimony.
`
`Vinson & Elkins, McDermott Will & Emery, Fulbright and Jaworski
`Orion IP, LLC v. Staples et al. (Harley Davidson, Toyota, and Home Depot) Civil
`Action No. 2:04-CV-297 (LED). Orion IP asserted U.S. Patent No. 5,367,627 Computer
`Assisted Parts Sales Method and U.S. Patent No. 5,615,342, Electronic Proposal Preparation
`System.
`Engaged to examine intellectual property valuation based on two patents, alternative
`cost issues surrounding the implementation of non-infringing substitute computer-based
`methods for the ‘342 and ‘627 patent, estimating non-infringing substitutes, estimate
`hypothetical negotiation licensee fees, examine patent invalidity based on prior art, Website
`analysis, valuation of custom designed software and custom and practice issues associated
`with intellectual property licensing fees. Engaged by Defendants to provide expert report and
`deposition.
`
`Shughart Thomson & Kilroy
`
`Emergis Technologies, Inc., f/k/a BCE Emergis Technologies, Inc. v. Kansas City
`Power & Light Co., in the United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri
`Kansas City Division, Civil Action No. 06-0201-CV-W-REL.
`
`Emergis filed suit against KCP&L alleging infringement of a patent, entitled
`“Electronic Invoicing and Payment System” U.S. Patent No. 6,044,362 (“the '362 Patent”)
`and seeking unspecified monetary damages and injunctive relief. This patent relates to
`automated electronic bill presentment and payment systems, particularly those involving
`Internet billing and collection. Engaged to estimate a non-infringing substitute, establish a
`license fee based on hypothetical negotiation, examine license agreement for conformance to
`specifications and software distribution rights. Engaged by defendant. Prepared expert report.
`
`Arnold & Porter LLP and Norris Keplinger & Logan LLP
`CSU, Inc. v. Xerox, Inc. In 1994, CSU filed suit against Xerox, alleging that Xerox
`violated the Sherman Antitrust Act by monopolizing the market for high speed copiers. The
`central issue was whether a unilateral refusal to license or sell intellectual property protected
`by patent or copyright is absolutely immune from a claim of monopolization and attempted
`monopolization under Section 2 of the Sherman Antitrust Act. Xerox counter claimed for
`patent and copyright infringement.
`
`Engaged to analyze the CSU $20 million business and determine if CSU would have
`grown to $100 million, but for Xerox’s refusal to sell CSU a patented product. Examined all
`documents such as financials, bank loans, management, business plans, capital formation
`documents and board decisions. Expert report, trial preparation and deposition on behalf of
`Xerox, Inc.
`
`
`__________________________________________________________________ Page 8
`
`AlmondNet, Inc.
`IPR2022-01064
`Ex. 2003
`Page 8 of 15
`
`

`

`Robert J. Sherwood
`12015 Wenonga Ln, Leawood, Kansas 66209 - 913-269-6589 -
`webtalkwithbob@gmail.com
`________________________________________________________
`Allen Dell, P.A.
`
`Accusoft Corporation f/k/a Pegasus Imaging Corporation v. John P. Reinhart, Jeffrey
`D. Amrein, Allscripts-Misys Healthcare Solutions, Inc. f/k/a Allscripts Healthcare Solutions,
`Inc. and AllscriptsMisys, LLC f/k/a Misys Healthcare Systems, LLC and successor by
`merger to Allscripts, LLC. In the Circuit Court of the Thirteenth Judicial Circuit in and for
`Hillsborough County, Florida Complex Business Litigation Division, Case No. 10-CA-
`018238 Division L. Engaged to provide expert report, deposition and trial on behalf of
`Pegasus Imaging Corporation.
`
`Farella Braun + Martel LLP
`
`Brandgenuity LLC Plaintiff v. Zynga Inc., f/k/a Zynga Game Network, Inc. In the
`Superior Court of the State of California in and for the County of San Francisco, Case No.
`CGC-12-520738 Engaged on behalf of Zynga. Plaintiff claims they supplied services to
`Zynga, for which Zynga refused to pay Plaintiff a $18 million commission for a licensing
`agreement for the use of Zynga brand names, such as Farmville. Provided analysis and
`examination on custom and practices in the brand licensing industry including agency fee
`schedules, royalty rates, license agreements, integration clauses and agency agreements.
`Engaged to provide expert report, deposition and trial.
`
`Law Office of Mick Lerner, PA and Stinson, Mag & Fizzell
`4th Trimester v. Reed Publishing, et al. Determine the value of a technology business.
`Expert report, deposition and testify at Arbitration for defendant.
`
`Thelen Reid & Priest LLP
`DJ&J Software Corporation dba Egghead Software and Elecom Corporation v. Casahl
`Technology, Inc. Examine sales of software from a reseller, but for developer’s refusal to
`supply current versions, ability of distributor to manage software through normal sales
`channels, value of software and quantity that would have been sold, but for software
`developer’s actions. Expert report and deposition for plaintiff.
`
`Ascano & Campo LLP
`Silicon Valley IPO Network et al. v. Kevin Von Poppen et al. Determine business value
`of video compression software had venture capital firm invested in startup and provided initial
`funding. Expert report for plaintiff.
`
`Morrison & Hecker LLP
`Universal Business Computing Company, Inc. and Ken Garen v. Global Enterprise
`Solutions, Inc. and Brian Unger. Determine value of founders equity share in the business had
`the founders had an agreement in writing for equity ownership, determine share price and
`actual total share ownership under premature departure of one of the cofounders. Expert report,
`deposition and testify at Arbitration for defendant.
`
`
`__________________________________________________________________ Page 9
`
`AlmondNet, Inc.
`IPR2022-01064
`Ex. 2003
`Page 9 of 15
`
`

`

`Robert J. Sherwood
`12015 Wenonga Ln, Leawood, Kansas 66209 - 913-269-6589 -
`webtalkwithbob@gmail.com
`________________________________________________________
`Steefel Levitt & Weiss
`Examine license agreement and software for conformance to contract specifications for
`functionality and use. Expert report and deposition.
`
`Grey Cary Friedenrich
`Examine license agreement for computer hardware and software for conformance to
`contract specifications for functionality and use. Consultant for plaintiff.
`
`Cooley Godward LLP
`Examine license agreement and software for conformance to contract specifications for
`functionality and use. Consultant.
`
`Michael Best & Friedrich
`Examine Websites for duplication of code and ownership of various software Website
`commerce and affiliate development components. Expert report for defendant.
`
`Cotton & Gundzik LLP
`Digital Insight v. HNC Software. Examine co-branding, OEM relationship, software
`customization, licensing of Website and business loss due to inappropriate distribution of
`Website software. Examine license agreement for conformance to specifications and software
`distribution rights. Expert report for plaintiff.
`
`Crosby Heafey Roach & Smith
`
`Raytheon Company vs. Webgear, Inc. & Ted Cooper, Case No. V-020232-9 Superior
`Court of California County of Alameda. Examine license agreement for conformance to
`specifications, verification of computer hardware and software documentation instructions,
`verification of software and wireless computer product use and determine value of software.
`Expert report for plaintiff.
`
`Howrey Simon Arnold & White LLP
`Business Management Systems Corporation v. Cable & Wireless USA, Inc. Civil
`Action No. 00-B-1069 United States District Court. Examine software best practices of
`enterprise software developer and methods of measuring license requirements, measurement
`data, and verification of software use, functionality and conformance with contract purchase
`development specifications. Examine license agreement for conformance to specifications and
`software distribution rights. Expert report, deposition and testified at trial for defendant.
`
`Mannatt Phelps & Phillips LLC
`Verity, Inc. v. Broadvision, Inc. Case No. C01-20501 RMW (PVT) ADR United States
`District Court for the Northern District of California San Jose Division. Examine license
`agreement and software for conformance to specifications, analyze customer software
`purchase levels for various levels of product upgrades, determine the number of customers that
`
`__________________________________________________________________ Page 10
`
`AlmondNet, Inc.
`IPR2022-01064
`Ex. 2003
`Page 10 of 15
`
`

`

`Robert J. Sherwood
`12015 Wenonga Ln, Leawood, Kansas 66209 - 913-269-6589 -
`webtalkwithbob@gmail.com
`________________________________________________________
`would have upgraded, but for the licensee’s inappropriate software distribution. Expert report,
`deposition and testified at Arbitration for plaintiff.
`
`Schlagel Damore & Gordon
`Determine value of enterprise software to licensor where licensee had developed a
`derivative product, examine business history, development and reproduction costs. Expert
`report and deposition for plaintiff. Examine license agreement for conformance to
`specifications and software distribution rights.
`
`Crosby Heafey Roach & Smith
`Examine license agreement for conformance to specifications and software distribution
`rights. Expert report for defendant.
`
`America On-Line Corporate Counsel
`
`Investigate the methods that might be used to establish comparative market values for
`email addresses and to indicate possible economic benchmarks. Civil suit regarding stolen
`email addresses and damages resulting from spamming. Consultant to AOL.
`
`Boies, Schiller & Flexner LLP
`
`The SCO Group Inc. vs. International Business Machines Corporation United States
`District Court, District of Utah, Case No. 03-CV-0294. Examine license agreements for
`derivative product rights, best practices with respect to derivative products, conformance to
`license agreement specifications for software development, use and distribution. Expert
`report for plaintiff.
`
`Law Offices of Jeffery P. Widman
`SunLan Corporation vs. Zenith Infotech, Inc. Case No. 04CC02648 Superior Court of
`California, County of Orange. Examine issues relating to sale of goods, distributor revenue
`sharing and pricing with respect to industry practices for computer hardware and software,
`OEM licensing and distribution agreements. Examine license agreement for conformance to
`specifications and software copy distribution rights. Expert report and deposition for
`defendant.
`
`Chan Law Group
`Perfumebay.Com, Inc. vs. EBAY, Inc., Case No.: CV04-1358 WDK (SSx) United
`States District Court for the Central District of California. Examine issue surrounding the use
`of trade names in a domain name including search return listings. Expert report for plaintiff.
`
`Latham & Watkins LLP
`Itech Group, Inc. v. National Semiconductor Corporation. Case No. CV 810872
`Superior Court of the State of California County of Santa Clara. Examine source code and
`
`__________________________________________________________________ Page 11
`
`AlmondNet, Inc.
`IPR2022-01064
`Ex. 2003
`Page 11 of 15
`
`

`

`Robert J. Sherwood
`12015 Wenonga Ln, Leawood, Kansas 66209 - 913-269-6589 -
`webtalkwithbob@gmail.com
`________________________________________________________
`object code license agreements and investment letters of intent surrounding a software
`licensing dispute. Expert report, deposition and testified at jury trial for defendant.
`
`Latham & Watkins LLP
`GR Match LLC v. Market Range LLC, et al. AAA Case Number 75-181-Y-00067-
`06. Examine issues relating to Website tracking methodologies for sponsored ads, natural
`search returns, advertising, customer life time value and affiliate tracking. Expert report and
`deposition for plaintiff.
`
`Capobianco and Bram, LLP
`Dovebid, Inc. v. eBay Inc., United States District Court for the Central District of
`California. Consultant for plaintiff.
`
`Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP
`Viewsonic Corporation vs. AmTran Technology Co., Ltd. United States District
`Court, Central District of California Case No. CV 05-5864 GAF (RZx). Expert report for
`defendant.
`
`Mayer, Brown, Rowe & Maw LLP
`
`Positive Ions, Inc. v. ION Media Networks, Inc. United States District Court
`Central District of California Case No. CV 06-4296 ABC (FFMx). Expert reports for
`defendant and counter claimant.
`
`Needham, Davis, Kepner & Young, LLP
`
`Ecompare v. Priceline.com. Engaged as a consultant for plaintiff in trade secret
`matter.
`
`Farella Braun + Martel LLP
`
`Securities and Exchange Commission v. Mark Leslie, United States District Court
`Northern District of California San Jose Division, Civil Action No. C 07-3444 JF. Engaged
`as expert witness for defendant. Expert report and deposition.
`
`Allen Dell, P.A.
`
`Pegasus Imaging Corporation v. Northrop Grumman Corporation et al., In the United
`States District Court, Middle District of Florida, Tampa Division Case No. 8:07-cv-01937.
`Engaged by Plaintiff. Examine license agreement for conformance to specifications and
`software copy distribution rights. Provided Expert report, deposition, trial assistance. The
`matter concerned a software developer kit license interpretation, software development best
`practices, software deployment methods, runtime analysis, and derivative product issues.
`
`Nelson& Weinkauf
`
`__________________________________________________________________ Page 12
`
`AlmondNet, Inc.
`IPR2022-01064
`Ex. 2003
`Page 12 of 15
`
`

`

`Robert J. Sherwood
`12015 Wenonga Ln, Leawood, Kansas 66209 - 913-269-6589 -
`webtalkwithbob@gmail.com
`________________________________________________________
`
`Trancos, Inc. dba Coregmedia vs. Brian Harley, Tallac Ventures, Inc., dba
`Tallacmedia.com and dba Leadshot, Superior Court of California, County of San Mateo-Case
`No. CIV-492361. Engaged by Plaintiff. Provided expert analysis and deposition assistance.
`The matter concerned trade secret misappropriation, breach of employment contract, Internet
`advertising, lead generation, affiliate tracking, and Website development and deployment.
`
`Nixon Peabody LLP
`
`Serena Software, Inc. v. Con-Way Inc. Case No. CIV 491585. Engaged by
`Defendant. Expert report. Examine license agreement for conformance to specifications and
`software copy distribution rights. Plaintiff contends that defendant breeched a license
`agreement. Further that because of this

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket