throbber
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER ELECTRONICS, VOL. 15, NO. 6, NOVEMBER 2000
`
`1275
`
`Characterization of Coreless Printed Circuit Board
`(PCB) Transformers
`
`S. C. Tang, Member, IEEE, S. Y. (Ron) Hui, Senior Member, IEEE, and Henry Shu-Hung Chung, Member, IEEE
`
`Abstract—In this paper, coreless printed-circuit-board trans-
`formers are characterized. A range of coreless printed circuit
`board (PCB) transformers with different geometric parameters
`have been fabricated and tested. Based on a recently reported
`analytic method, the self inductance of these transformers is
`calculated. This analytical method is also extended to cover the
`prediction of the transformers’ mutual inductance. All calculated
`parameters have been confirmed with measurements for the
`frequency range from 100 kHz to 30 MHz. These results provide
`useful information for the optimal design of coreless PCB trans-
`formers.
`
`Index Terms—Coreless PCB transformers, planar transformers
`and windings, printed circuit board transformers.
`
`I. INTRODUCTION
`
`T HE NEED for compactness in power converter has led to
`
`the increase in operation frequency and the use of planar
`magnetics. Recent research on planar inductors [1]–[3] and mi-
`crotransformers [4]–[8] shows that thickness of magnetic ma-
`terial of these devices can be minimized to a few hundred of
`micrometer ( m) and the switching frequency can exceed 1
`MHz. Although much progress has been made in using printed
`transformer windings, the use of magnetic cores in transformers
`is still the dominant trend [4]–[9]. Transformers fabricated on
`PCB eliminate the manufacturing cost of manual windings [9].
`However, space is still required to accommodate the magnetic
`cores.
`Recently, the use of coreless PCB transformers [10]–[16]
`have been reported. These transformers have been successfully
`demonstrated in isolated MOSFETs/IGBT’s gate drive circuits.
`Coreless PCB transformers do not need space to accommodate
`the magnetic core and have no core limitations such as core
`losses and saturation. Their sizes can be smaller than those of
`core-based transformers. This inherent low-profile property
`makes the coreless transformers suitable for applications in
`which stringent space and height requirements have to be met.
`Moreover, the dielectric breakdown voltage of PCB typically
`ranges from 15 kV to 40 kV [17].
`In this paper, the inductive characteristics of coreless PCB
`transformers with different geometric parameters are studied.
`Factors includes: i) outermost radius, ii) number of turns, iii)
`conductor width, iv) laminate thickness and v) conductor thick-
`
`Manuscript received October 25, 1999; revised September 8, 2000. The au-
`thors are grateful to the Research Grant Council of Hong Kong for their support
`of this project under Contract CERG 9040466.
`The authors are with the Department of Electronic Engineering, City Univer-
`sity of Hong Kong, Kowloon, Hong Kong.
`Publisher Item Identifier S 0885-8993(00)10578-2.
`
`Fig. 1. Typical structure of a coreless PCB transformer with circular spiral
`windings.
`
`ness on the transformer’s characteristics are investigated. The
`inductive parameters are calculated using a recently reported an-
`alytical method [18]. The calculated results are confirmed with
`the measured results for the frequency range from 100 kHz to
`30 MHz.
`
`II. INDUCTANCES CALCULATIONS OF CORELESS PCB
`TRANSFORMERS
`
`The PCB transformer consists of three parts: the primary
`winding, the dielectric laminate, and the secondary winding.
`Planar windings of various shapes have been studied [2]. It has
`been found that circular spiral windings provide the greatest in-
`ductance among various types of winding configuration. Fig. 1
`shows the three-dimensional (3-D) structure of a coreless PCB
`transformer. There are
`primary turns and
`secondary
`turns, printed on the opposite sides of a double-sided PCB. The
`PCB transformer can be built on the same circuit board with
`other electronics. It can also be fabricated on another PCB as
`a stand-alone device if desired. There is no need to cut hole
`on the PCB for accommodating the magnetic cores in coreless
`PCB transformers.
`The spiral windings in Fig. 1 can be approximated as concen-
`tric circular windings connected in series [1] with infinitesimal
`connections as shown in Fig. 2. For an
`-turns spiral coil, the
`total self-inductance is the summation of each mutual induc-
`tance pairs between two concentric circular coils,
`, where
`both and are from 1 to
`. Fig. 3 shows the
`-plane cross sec-
`tion of the transformer in Fig. 2. The mutual magnetic flux cou-
`pling of primary winding pairs is drawn by thick solid lines and
`those of secondary winding pairs appear as thick dotted lines.
`
`0885–8993/00$10.00 © 2000 IEEE
`
`Authorized licensed use limited to: BOSTON UNIVERSITY. Downloaded on March 18,2022 at 13:34:12 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
`
`Page 1 of 8
`
`SAMSUNG EXHIBIT 1016
`
`

`

`1276
`
`IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER ELECTRONICS, VOL. 15, NO. 6, NOVEMBER 2000
`
`where
`
`Fig. 2. Approximation of circular spiral windings as concentric circles.
`
`The self-inductance of the primary and secondary windings are
`given by (1) and (2), respectively
`
`(1)
`
`(2)
`
`is
`
`is number of turns of primary winding and
`where
`number of turns of secondary winding.
`Mutual inductance between the primary and the secondary
`coils of a planar transformer can also be derived. For an
`-
`turns primary and
`-turns secondary transformer, the mutual
`inductance is the sum of mutual magnetic coupling pairs be-
`tween primary and secondary coils. The thin arrows in Fig. 3
`represent the mutual magnetic flux coupling between the pri-
`mary and secondary windings. Thus, the mutual inductance be-
`tween the primary and the secondary windings is given by
`
`(3)
`
`The leakage magnetic flux on the primary side is the dif-
`ference between the total magnetic flux setup in the primary
`winding and that coupled to the secondary. The primary leakage
`inductance is given by
`
`Derivation of mutual inductance,
`, between two circular
`tracks with rectangular cross section has been reported by
`Hurley and Duffy [18]
`
`(4)
`
`(5)
`
`when
`
`when
`
`(6)
`
`permeability of vacuum;
`first kind Bessel function of order zero;
`inner radius of the th circular track;
`outer radius of the th circular track;
`height of the th circular track;
`inner radius of the th circular track;
`outer radius of the th circular track;
`height of the th circular track;
`separation between the circular tracks.
`
`III. CORELESS PCB TRANSFORMERS WITH VARIOUS
`GEOMETRIC PARAMETERS
`
`Equations (1) to (6) indicate that all of the inductive parame-
`ters depend on the geometry of the coreless planar transformer.
`These inductive parameters vary with
`1) outermost radius;
`2) number of turns;
`3) conductor width;
`4) lamination thickness;
`5) conductor thickness.
`The simulated results obtained from both (5) and the finite ele-
`ment analysis (FEA) [20] are consistent with the measured re-
`sults. However, computation using the analytic solution in (5)
`is more time efficient than that using FEA. The calculations
`of self, mutual and leakage inductances of the coreless PCB
`transformers using the analytical method are implemented by
`MATLAB programs. The laminate used in the coreless PCB-
`based transformers under test is FR-4 material. The conductor
`material is copper with gold plating. The geometry of primary
`winding and secondary winding are the same, so they have the
`same self-inductance. In this section, the testing frequency is 10
`MHz. The effects of the frequency on transformer inductances
`will be discussed in Section IV.
`
`A. Different Outermost Radii with the Same Number of Turns
`(Transformer Series #1)
`A series of coreless PCB transformers with different outer-
`most radii
`from 3 mm to 33 mm have been tested and sim-
`ulated. These transformers have different track separation, but
`have the same number of turns. The dimensions of this trans-
`former series are tabulated in the second column of Table I. The
`
`Authorized licensed use limited to: BOSTON UNIVERSITY. Downloaded on March 18,2022 at 13:34:12 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
`
`Page 2 of 8
`
`

`

`TANG et al.: CORELESS PRINTED CIRCUIT BOARD (PCB) TRANSFORMERS
`
`1277
`
`Fig. 3. Diagram showing coupling paths between various turns.
`
`Fig. 4. Dimensions of some coreless PCB transformers in transformer series
`#1.
`
`Fig. 5.
`
`Inductances of transformer series #1.
`
`geometry of primary winding is the same as that of the sec-
`ondary winding, and they are printed on the opposite side of a
`double-sided PCB. Fig. 4 shows the dimensions of coreless PCB
`transformers (from
`mm to
`mm) in this transformer
`series. The calculated and measured results are plotted in Fig. 5.
`It is found that the self-inductance increases linearly with radius
`. The self-inductance of the primary winding is given by
`
`where
`is a constant that depends on number of turns and ge-
`ometry of the primary winding.
`
`(7)
`
`When the diameter,
`, is much greater than the laminate
`thickness,
`, the mutual inductance and the leakage inductance
`increase linearly. Their asymptotes are given by
`
`(8)
`
`(9)
`
`The mutual inductance and the leakage inductance can be rep-
`resented as
`
`(10)
`
`(11)
`
`are constants that depend on the number
`, and
`where ,
`of turns, geometry of the transformer windings and the lami-
`nate thickness. In general
`is much greater than
`. Obviously,
`the slope of mutual inductance is much greater than that of the
`leakage inductance. It means when radius increases, the increase
`of mutual inductance is greater than that of leakage inductance.
`Thus, the coupling coefficient of a coreless PCB transformer can
`be improved by increasing the transformer area.
`
`B. Different Number of Turns with the Same Radii
`(Transformer Series #2)
`Coreless PCB transformers with different number of primary
`(
`) and secondary turns (
`), from one to 20 turns, have
`been examined. In this transformer series, the transformer
`radius is kept constant so that the track separation decreases
`as the number of turns increases. The geometric parameters
`are described in the third column of Table I. Fig. 6 shows the
`dimensions of some coreless PCB transformers in this series.
`Fig. 7 indicates that the self-inductance, mutual inductance and
`
`Authorized licensed use limited to: BOSTON UNIVERSITY. Downloaded on March 18,2022 at 13:34:12 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
`
`Page 3 of 8
`
`

`

`1278
`
`IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER ELECTRONICS, VOL. 15, NO. 6, NOVEMBER 2000
`
`Fig. 6. Dimensions of some coreless PCB transformers in transformer series
`#2.
`
`Fig. 9.
`
`Inductances of transformer series #3.
`
`Fig. 10. Dimensions of coreless PCB transformers of transformer series #4.
`
`C. Different Number of Turns with the Same Track Separation
`(Transformer Series #3)
`
`This transformer series has different number of turns, from 1
`to 40 turns. Their geometric parameters are shown in the fourth
`column of Table I. Since the winding separation is fixed, the
`transformer radius increases as number of turns increases. Fig. 8
`illustrates the configuration of the transformer series.
`Fig. 9 shows that as the number of turns increases (the
`transformer area also increases), the rates of increase of self-in-
`ductance and mutual inductance are much greater than that of
`leakage inductance. Similar to the case of transformer series
`#1, when radius increases, the increase of mutual inductance
`is greater than that of leakage inductance. These results show
`that the coupling factor can be increased by increasing the
`transformer area with or without increase number of turns.
`However, increasing the number of turns has another advantage.
`The self-inductance increases substantially (in the order of
`)
`which can be described as
`
`(nH)
`(nH)
`(nH)
`
`(14a)
`(14b)
`(14c)
`
`D. Different Laminate Thickness (Transformer Series #4)
`
`The laminate thickness of PCB’s under test is from 0.4 mm to
`1.55 mm. Separation between the primary and secondary wind-
`ings plays an important role in coreless planar transformer de-
`sign. The smaller the separation of the printed windings is, the
`greater the magnetic flux coupling becomes. As separation in-
`creases, the magnetic coupling between the primary and sec-
`ondary windings decreases. The calculated and the measured
`results are shown in Fig. 11. The transformer geometric param-
`eters are given in the fifth column of Table I. The winding con-
`figuration of this transformer series is shown in Fig. 10.
`
`Fig. 7.
`
`Inductances of transformer series #2.
`
`Fig. 8. Dimensions of some coreless PCB transformers in transformer series
`#3.
`
`leakage inductance of the transformers of series #2 follow a
`second-order polynomial of
`as given by
`
`(nH)
`(nH)
`(nH)
`
`(12a)
`(12b)
`(12c)
`
`From (12) and Fig. 7, the changes of mutual and leakage in-
`ductance are found to be at a similar rate. It implies increasing
`the number of turns without increasing the area or decreasing
`the laminate thickness cannot improve the transformer coupling
`factor significantly.
`For traditional core-based transformer, the self-inductance is
`proportional to the square of number of turns, i.e., when there
`are two windings on the same core but different number of turns,
`and
`, the inductance ratio is given by
`
`(13)
`
`From (12), it is clear that coreless PCB transformers do not
`follow (13). Equation (13) is only valid for coreless transformer
`when the number of turn is significantly large so that the
`term in (12) is much greater than the
`term.
`
`Authorized licensed use limited to: BOSTON UNIVERSITY. Downloaded on March 18,2022 at 13:34:12 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
`
`Page 4 of 8
`
`

`

`TANG et al.: CORELESS PRINTED CIRCUIT BOARD (PCB) TRANSFORMERS
`
`1279
`
`TABLE I
`DESCRIPTION OF TRANSFORMER SERIES
`
`Fig. 12. Dimensions of coreless PCB transformers of transformer series #4.
`
`Fig. 11.
`
`Inductances of transformer series #4.
`
`E. Different Conductor Width (Transformer Series #5)
`The coreless PCB transformers with different track widths
`have been examined. The track separation is fixed at 0.5 mm.
`The track width for simulation ranges from 0.025 mm to 0.475
`mm. In the practical tests, the track width is restricted from 0.1
`mm to 0.4 mm. The transformers with different tracks are shown
`in Fig. 12. Their dimensions are shown in the sixth column
`of Table I. The measured and calculated results are plotted in
`Fig. 13. The variations of the inductances can be expressed as
`
`Fig. 13.
`
`Inductances of transformer series #5.
`
`(nH)
`(nH)
`(nH)
`
`(15a)
`(15b)
`(15c)
`
`Fig. 14. Dimensions of coreless PCB transformers of transformer series #6.
`
`where the track width
`is in millimeters.
`Fig. 13 shows that the self, mutual and leakage inductances
`do not vary significantly with the track width. Under the
`testing range, the variation of self-inductance is 50 nH which
`
`is about 8% of the self-inductance. By differentiating (15) at
`0.25 mm, the tolerance of self-inductance of a 0.25 mm
`width winding in series #5 is about
`0.183 nH/ m. Similarly,
`
`Authorized licensed use limited to: BOSTON UNIVERSITY. Downloaded on March 18,2022 at 13:34:12 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
`
`Page 5 of 8
`
`

`

`1280
`
`IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER ELECTRONICS, VOL. 15, NO. 6, NOVEMBER 2000
`
`Fig. 15.
`
`Inductances of transformer series #6.
`
`Fig. 16. Frequency characteristics of a coreless PCB transformer with N = N = 10 Turns, s = s = 0:5 mm, w = w = 0:25 mm, h = 0:35 mm and
`z = 1:55 mm.
`
`the tolerance of mutual and leakage inductances are about
`0.006 38 nH/ m and
`0.177 nH/ m, respectively.
`
`Differentiating (16) with respect to
`
`yields
`
`F. Different Conductor Thickness (Transformer Series #6)
`
`The conductor thickness for calculation is from 1 m to 100
`m. In the test, the PCB conductor thickness is 35 m and 70
`m. The pattern of the transformer winding is shown in Fig. 14
`and described by the seventh column of Table I. Fig. 15 shows
`that the variation of inductances is negligible for the coreless
`PCB transformer with different conductor thickness.
`The relationship between the inductive parameters and the
`conductor thickness,
`, (in m) of the coreless PCB transformer
`series can be expressed as
`
`(nH/ m)
`
`(nH/ m)
`
`(nH/ m)
`
`(17a)
`
`(17b)
`
`(17c)
`
`From (16) and (17), when the conductor thickness is
`increased from 35 m to 70 m, the variations of the self-in-
`ductance, mutual
`inductance and leakage inductance are
`0.877% 0.005% and
`1.768%, respectively. The variation of
`conductor thickness does not affect the inductive parameters
`significantly.
`
`(nH)
`
`(nH)
`
`(nH)
`
`(16a)
`
`(16b)
`
`(16c)
`
`IV. FREQUENCY CHARACTERISTICS OF CORELESS PCB
`TRANSFORMERS
`
`The frequency characteristics of coreless PCB transformer
`have been measured. The testing frequency is from 100 kHz to
`30 MHz. The configuration of the transformer under examina-
`tion is shown in Fig. 10. The transformer dimensions are de-
`
`Authorized licensed use limited to: BOSTON UNIVERSITY. Downloaded on March 18,2022 at 13:34:12 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
`
`Page 6 of 8
`
`

`

`TANG et al.: CORELESS PRINTED CIRCUIT BOARD (PCB) TRANSFORMERS
`
`1281
`
`TABLE II
`CHANGES OF INDUCTIVE PARAMETERS (FROM 1 MHz TO 30 MHz) OF
`THE TRANSFORMER DESCRIBED IN FIG. 10
`
`scribed by the fifth column of Table I but the laminate thickness
`is fixed at 1.55 mm. The measured results of inductive param-
`eters are shown in Fig. 16. The inductance variations with fre-
`quency are expressed as
`
`(nH)
`
`(18a)
`
`(nH)
`
`(18b)
`
`(nH) (18c)
`
`where
`is in MHz.
`By differentiating (18), the change of inductive parameters of
`the coreless PCB transformer can be expressed as
`
`(nH)
`
`(19a)
`
`(nH)
`
`(19b)
`
`(nH)
`
`(19c)
`
`From (19), the variations of self, mutual and leakage induc-
`0.73
`tances of the coreless PCB transformer at 10 MHz are
`nH/MHz,
`1.225 nH/MHz and
`0.355 nH/MHz, respectively.
`When the testing frequency sweeps from 1 MHz to 30 MHz, the
`changes of the inductive parameters are tabulated in Table II.
`As expected, the inductive parameters do not change much with
`frequency because there is no core saturation. Moreover, the
`measured results from Fig. 16 and Table II indicate that when
`the operating frequency is changing, the coreless transformer
`with printed winding structure has smaller inductance devia-
`tion than the coreless twist-wire transformers [20]. These results
`imply that the analytical method using (1)–(6) is accurate for
`predicting the inductive parameters of the coreless PCB trans-
`formers in the testing frequency range.
`
`V. CONCLUSION
`
`Self, mutual and leakage inductances of coreless transformers
`with various geometric parameters have been analyzed. Based
`on an analytical method, the inductive parameters of coreless
`PCB transformers are calculated. The calculated results have
`been confirmed with the measurements. The inductance of core-
`less PCB transformers depend on
`
`i) transformer outermost radius ( );
`ii) number of turns (
`);
`iii) conductor width (
`);
`iv) laminate thickness ( );and
`v) conductor thickness ( ).
`Variations of i) and ii) affect all of the inductive parame-
`ters significantly. The self-inductance of coreless PCB trans-
`formers is a linear function of the transformers’ outermost ra-
`dius . The mutual and leakage inductances are also linear func-
`tions of
`provided that
`is much greater than the laminate
`thickness,
`. The inductive parameters are 2nd order functions
`of number of turns,
`, when
`is fixed. In the case of fixed
`track separation, the inductive parameters are 3rd order func-
`tions of number of turns,
`. The thicker the PCB is, the smaller
`the mutual inductance becomes. However, the self-inductance
`is not affected by the laminate thickness significantly. The con-
`ductor width and thickness do not affect the inductive param-
`eters enormously. The measured frequency characteristics of
`coreless PCB transformer with testing frequency ranges from
`100 kHz to 30 MHz show that the inductive parameters do not
`change with frequency significantly.
`
`REFERENCES
`
`[1] R. F. Soohoo, “Magnetic thin film inductors for integrated circuit appli-
`cations,” IEEE Trans. Magn., vol. Mag-15, pp. 1803–1805, Nov. 1979.
`[2] K. Kawabe, H. Koyama, and K. Shirae, “Planar inductor,” IEEE Trans.
`Magn., vol. MAG-20, pp. 1804–1806, Sept. 1984.
`[3] W. A. Roshen and D. E. Turcotte, “Planer inductors on magnetic sub-
`strates,” IEEE Trans. Magn., vol. MAG-24, pp. 3213–3216, Nov. 1988.
`[4] M. Mino, T. Yachi, A. Tago, K. Yanagisawa, and K. Sakakibara, “Planar
`microtransformer with monolithically-integrated rectifier diodes for
`micro-switching converters,” IEEE Trans. Magn., vol. MAG-32, pp.
`291–296, Mar. 1996.
`[5] K. Yamasawa, K. Maruyama, I. Hirohama, and P. P. Biringer, “High-
`frequency operation of a planar-type microtransformer and its appli-
`cation to multilayered switching regulators,” IEEE Trans. Magn., vol.
`MAG-26, pp. 1204–1209, May 1990.
`[6] K. Onda, A. Kanouda, T. Takahashi, S. Hagiwara, and H. Horie, “Thin
`type DC/DC converter using a coreless wire transformer,” in Proc. IEEE
`PESC’94, 1994, pp. 1330–1334.
`[7] N. Dai, A. W. Lofti, G. Skutt, W. Tabisz, and F.C. Lee, “A comparative
`study of high-frequency, low-profile planar transformer technologies,”
`in Proc. IEEE APEC’94, 1994, pp. 226–232.
`[8] K. Yamaguchi, S. Ohnuma, T. Imagawa, J. Toriu, H. Matsuki, and K.
`Murakami, “Characteristics of a thin film microtransformer with circular
`spiral coils,” IEEE Trans. Magn., vol. MAG-29, pp. 2232–2237, Sept.
`1993.
`[9] J. M. Bourgeois, “PCB based transformer for power MOSFET drive,”
`in Proc. IEEE APEC’94, 1994, pp. 238–244.
`[10] S. Y. R. Hui, S. C. Tang, and H. Chung, “Coreless printed-circuit board
`transformers for signal and energy transfer,” Electron Lett., vol. 34, no.
`11, pp. 1052–1054, 1998.
`[11] S. Y. R. Hui, H. Chung, and S. C. Tang, “Coreless PCB-based trans-
`formers for power MOSFETs/IGBT’s gate drive circuits,” IEEE Trans.
`Power Electron., vol. 14, pp. 422–430, May 1999.
`[12] S. C. Tang, S. Y. R. Hui, and H. Chung, “Coreless PCB transformer with
`multiple secondary windings for complementary gate drive circuits,”
`IEEE Trans. Power Electron., vol. 14, pp. 431–437, May 1999.
`[13] H. Chung, S. Y. R. Hui, and S. C. Tang, “Design and analysis of multi-
`stage switched capacitor based step-down DC–DC converters,” IEEE
`Trans. Circuits Syst. I, vol. 47, pp. 1017–1025, July 2000.
`[14] S. Y. R. Hui, S. C. Tang, and H. Chung, “Optimal operation of core-
`less PCB transformer-isolated gate drive circuits with wide switching
`frequency range,” IEEE Trans. Power Electron., vol. 14, pp. 506–514,
`May 1999.
`[15] S. Y. R. Hui and S. C. Tang, “Coreless printed-circuit-board (PCB) trans-
`formers,” U.S. patent pending, Feb. 1998.
`
`Authorized licensed use limited to: BOSTON UNIVERSITY. Downloaded on March 18,2022 at 13:34:12 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
`
`Page 7 of 8
`
`

`

`1282
`
`IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER ELECTRONICS, VOL. 15, NO. 6, NOVEMBER 2000
`
`Henry Shu-Hung Chung (S’92–M’95) received the
`B.Eng. (with first class honors) and Ph.D. degrees
`in electrical engineering from The Hong Kong Poly-
`technic University, Kowloon, in 1991 and 1994, re-
`spectively.
`Since 1995, he has been with the City University
`of Hong Kong. He is currently an Associate Professor
`in the Department of Electronic Engineering. His re-
`search interests include time- and frequency-domain
`analysis of power electronic circuits, switched-capac-
`itor-based converters, random-switching techniques,
`digital audio amplifiers, and soft-switching converters. He has authored two
`research book chapters, and over 110 technical papers including 50 refereed
`journal papers in the current research area.
`Dr. Chung received the China Light and Power Prize and was the Scholarship
`and Fellowship of the Sir Edward Youde Memorial Fund, in 1991 and 1993,
`respectively. He is Chairman of the Council of the Sir Edward Youde Scholar’s
`Association and IEEE Student Branch Counselor. He was Track Chair of the
`Technical Committee on Power Electronics Circuits and Power Systems of IEEE
`Circuits and Systems Society, from 1997 to 1998. He is an Associate Editor of
`the IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON CIRCUITS AND SYSTEMS—PART I: FUNDAMENTAL
`THEORY AND APPLICATIONS.
`
`[16] S. Y. R. Hui, S. C. Tang, and H. Chung, “An accurate circuit model for
`coreless PCB-based transformers,” in Proc. Eur. Power Electron. Conf.,
`Trondheim, Norway, Sept. 1997, pp. 4.123–4.128.
`[17] C. F. Coombs Jr., Printed Circuits Handbooks 3rd Edition. New York:
`McGraw-Hill, 1998, p. 6.32.
`[18] W. G. Hurley and M. C. Duffy, “Calculation of self and mutual imped-
`ances in planar magnetic structures,” IEEE Trans. Magn., vol. 31, pp.
`2416–2422, July 1995.
`[19] S. Hayano, Y. Nakajima, H. Saotome, and Y. Saito, “A new type high
`frequency transformer,” IEEE Trans. Magn., vol. 27, pp. 5205–5207,
`Nov. 1991.
`[20] “Getting started: A 2D Parametric Problem,” Ansoft Corporation,
`Maxwell 2D Field Simulator, (v. 6.4), July 1997.
`
`S. C. Tang (M’98) was born in Hong Kong in 1972.
`He received the B.Eng. (with first class honors) and
`Ph.D. degrees in electronic engineering from the
`City University of Hong Kong, Kowloon in 1997
`and 2000, respectively.
`He is a Research Fellow with the City University
`of Hong Kong. His research interests include
`coreless PCB transformers, high-frequency mag-
`netics, MOSFET/IGBT gate drive circuits, isolation
`amplifiers, and low profile converters.
`Dr. Tang is the Champion of the Institution of
`Electrical Engineers (IEE) Hong Kong Younger Member Section Paper Contest
`2000. He received the Li Po Chun Scholarships and Intertek Testing Services
`(ITS) Scholarships, in 1996 and 1997, respectively, the First Prize Award from
`the IEEE HK Section Student Paper Contest in 1997, was the second winner in
`the Hong Kong Institution of Engineers (HKIE) 50th Anniversary Electronics
`Engineering Project Competition, and received the Certificates of Merit in the
`IEEE Paper Contests (Hong Kong Section), in 1998 and 1999, respectively.
`
`S. Y. (Ron) Hui (M’87–SM’94) was born in Hong
`Kong in 1961. He received the B.Sc. degree (with
`honors) from the University of Birmingham, Birm-
`ingham, U.K. in 1984 and the D.I.C. and Ph.D. de-
`grees from the Imperial College of Science, Tech-
`nology, and Medicine, London, U.K., in 1987.
`He was a Lecturer with the University of Not-
`tingham, U.K., from 1987 to 1990. In 1990, he went
`to Australia and joined the University of Technology,
`Sydney, where he became a Senior Lecturer in 1991.
`He later joined the University of Sydney, where he
`became a Reader of Electrical Engineering in January 1996. He is now a Chair
`Professor of Electronic Engineering and Associate Dean of the Faculty of
`Science and Engineering with the City University of Hong Kong, Kowloon. He
`has been appointed an Honorary Professor by the University of Sydney since
`2000. He has published over 150 technical papers including about 80 refereed
`journal publications.
`Dr. Hui received the Teaching Excellence Award from the City University
`of Hong Kong, in 1999. He has been an Associate Editor of the IEEE
`TRANSACTIONS ON POWER ELECTRONICS since 1997.
`
`Authorized licensed use limited to: BOSTON UNIVERSITY. Downloaded on March 18,2022 at 13:34:12 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
`
`Page 8 of 8
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket