IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`WACO DIVISION
`
`CPC PATENT TECHNOLOGIES PTY
`LTD,
` Plaintiff
`
`-v-
`
`APPLE INC.,
` Defendant
`
`
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`
`
`
`
`CASE NO. 6:21-CV-00165-ADA
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`CLAIM CONSTRUCTION ORDER
`
`The Court provides the following claim constructions for U.S. Patent Nos. 9,269,208
`
`(“’208 Patent); 8,620,039 (“’039 Patent”); and 9,665,705 (“’705 Patent”) after considering the
`
`parties’ briefs and oral argument held February 10, 2022. Dkt. Nos. 46, 49, 52. The Court enters
`
`its final constructions for each term:
`
`NO.
`
`Claim Term
`
`Court’s
`Final Construction
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`“biometric card pointer
`system”
`
`’039 Patent Cls. 1, 19
`
`“biometric card pointer
`enrollment system”
`
`’039 Patent Cl. 13
`
`Nonlimiting preamble term with no patentable weight.
`
`Nonlimiting preamble term with no patentable weight.
`
`for defining,
`“means
`dependent
`upon
`the
`received
`card
`information, a memory
`location
`in
`a
`local
`memory external to the
`card”
`
`
`Means plus function language pursuant to section 112.
`
`
`The function of this limitation is “defining, dependent upon
`the received card information, a memory location in a local
`memory external to the card.”
`
`
`Structure corresponding to the claimed means is a
`computer system with a processor executing an application
`
`ASSA ABLOY Ex. 1009 - Page 1
`ASSA ABLOY AB v. CPC Patent Technologies Pty Ltd.
`IPR2022-01045 - U.S. Patent No. 9,269,208
`
`

`

`’039 Patent, Cl. 13
`
`“means for storing, if the
`memory
`location
`is
`unoccupied,
`the
`biometric signature at the
`defined
`memory
`location”
`
`characterized
`
`“being
`according
`to/determining/determine
`at least one of the number
`of said entries and a
`duration of each said
`entry”
`
`’208 Patent Cls. 1, 9, 10
`’705 Patent Cls. 1, 10, 11,
`14, 15, 16, 17
`
`“biometric signature”
`
`’208 Patent, Cls. 1, 9, 11;
`’705 Patent, Cls. 1, 11,
`12, 14, 15, 17
`
`
`that uses any segment of card information 605 from a card
`601 (1) as a memory reference as shown in Fig. 4 or (2) to
`determine a group of associated memory references or 3)
`all equivalents of (1) and (2). Structure is found in ’039
`Patent, col. 6, line 66 – col. 7, line 23; col. 7, lines 31-35,
`39-42, 47-48; col. 8, lines 44-46; col. 11, lines 29-37; col.
`12, lines 1-9; Fig. 4.
`
`Means plus function language pursuant to section 112.
`
`Function: storing, if the memory location is unoccupied,
`the biometric signature at the defined memory location.
`
`Structure: a computer system with a processor unit 105
`running software process(es) 401 and at least one of: a
`storage device 109 or memory 106. Structure is found in
`’039 Patent, col. 6, line 66 – col. 7, line 23; col. 5, lines 13-
`18 & lines 19-22 & 23-30; Fig. 7, step 401.
`
`“being characterized according to/determining/determine”
`is given its plain and ordinary meaning. The Court rejects
`the proposal to construe these words as “identifying and
`storing…”
`
`“at least” modifies “one of the number of said entries.” The
`claim additionally requires “a duration of each said entry.”1
`
`Plain and ordinary meaning.
`
`
`
`“accessibility attribute”
`
`’208 Patent, Cls. 1, 9, 10;
`
`“attribute that establishes whether and under which
`conditions access to the controlled item should be granted
`to a user”
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`1 Both parties’ arguments found support in case law and in and the specification, but Apple’s
`argument found further support in the prosecution history.
`
`ASSA ABLOY Ex. 1009 - Page 2
`ASSA ABLOY AB v. CPC Patent Technologies Pty Ltd.
`IPR2022-01045 - U.S. Patent No. 9,269,208
`
`

`

`’705 Patent, Cls. 1, 10,
`11, 14, 15, 16, 17
`
`8
`
`“collocated”
`
`’705 Patent, Cl. 9
`
`“means for mapping said
`series into an instruction”
`
`’208 Patent, Cls. 1, 9
`
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`“means for populating
`the database of biometric
`signatures”
`
`’208 Patent, Cls. 1, 9
`
`
`“means for populating
`the database according to
`the instruction”
`
`’208 Patent, Cls. 1, 9
`
`
`
`Plain and ordinary meaning (which is not “occurring in
`conjunction with”).
`
`Means plus function language pursuant to section 112.
`
`The function of this limitation is “mapping said series into
`an instruction.”
`
`Structure corresponding to the claimed means is a
`computer program product having a computer readable
`medium having a computer program recorded therein, with
`code for mapping said series into an instruction. Structure
`is found in ’208 Patent, col. 4, lines 25-31 & 37; col. 5 line
`50 – col. 6 line 27; col. 10 line 45 – col. 11 line 2; col. 12
`lines 55-59; col. 12 line 67 – col. 13 line 3; Figure 2, items
`103, 107, 121.
`
`Means plus function language pursuant to section 112.
`
`
`The function of this limitation is “populating the database
`of biometric signatures.”
`
`
`Structure corresponding to the claimed means is (1) the
`database and (2) a computer program product having a
`computer readable medium having a computer program
`recorded therein, with code for storing biometric signatures
`to the database. Structure is found in ’208 Patent, col. 4,
`lines 25-31 & 38-39; col. 10 line 57 – col. 11 line 2; col. 12
`lines 43-45; col. 13 lines 9-11, 15-19.
`
`Means plus function language pursuant to section 112.
`
`
`The function of this limitation is “populating the database
`according to the instruction.”
`
`
`Structure corresponding to the claimed means is (1) the
`database and (2) a computer program product having a
`computer readable medium having a computer program
`recorded therein, with code for populating the database
`according to the instruction. Structure is found in ’208
`Patent, col. 4, lines 25-31 & 38-39; col. 10 lines 32-34; col.
`
`ASSA ABLOY Ex. 1009 - Page 3
`ASSA ABLOY AB v. CPC Patent Technologies Pty Ltd.
`IPR2022-01045 - U.S. Patent No. 9,269,208
`
`

`

`“means for matching the
`biometric signal against
`members of the database
`of biometric signatures
`to thereby output an
`accessibility attribute”
`
`12
`
`10 line 57 – col. 11 line 2; col. 12 lines 43-45; col. 13 lines
`9-11, 15-19.
`
`Means plus function language pursuant to section 112.
`
`
`The function of this limitation is “means for matching the
`biometric signal against members of the database of
`biometric signatures to thereby output an accessibility
`attribute.”
`
`
`Structure corresponding to the claimed means is a database
`and a computer program product having a computer
`readable medium having a computer program recorded
`therein, with code for matching the biometric signal against
`members of the database of biometric signatures to thereby
`output an accessibility attribute. Structure is found in ʼ208
`Patent, col. 4, lines 8-13, 15-17, 40-45 & 47-49; col. 5,
`lines 50-67; col. 6 line 56 – col. 7 line 2; col. 7 line 65 –
`col. 8 line 10; col. 8, line 67 – col. 9, line 5; col. 14 lines
`10-42; Figure 2, items 103, 105; figure 3, item 202.
`
`
`SIGNED this 10th day of February, 2022.
`
`
`
`
`
`r
`1/ f_
`
`ALAN D ALBRIGHT
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
`
`ASSA ABLOY Ex. 1009 - Page 4
`ASSA ABLOY AB v. CPC Patent Technologies Pty Ltd.
`IPR2022-01045 - U.S. Patent No. 9,269,208
`
`