`571-272-7822
`
`
`
`
`Paper 53
`Entered: April 1, 2024
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`
`ASSA ABLOY AB, ASSA ABLOY INC.,
`ASSA ABLOY RESIDENTIAL GROUP, INC.,
`AUGUST HOME, INC.,
`HID GLOBAL CORPORATION, and
`ASSA ABLOY GLOBAL SOLUTIONS, INC.,
`Petitioner,
`v.
`CPC PATENT TECHNOLOGIES PTY, LTD.,
`Patent Owner.
`
`IPR2022-01006 (Patent 9,665,705 B2)
`IPR2022-01045 (Patent 9,269,208 B2)
`IPR2022-01089 (Patent 9,269,208 B2)1
`
`
`Before SCOTT A. DANIELS, BARRY L. GROSSMAN, and
`AMBER L. HAGY, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`GROSSMAN, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`SUPPLEMENT TO
`SCHEDULING ORDER FOLLOWING REMAND
`
`
`
`1 This Order applies to each of the above captioned proceedings. Unless
`specifically authorized by the Board, the parties are not authorized to use
`this style of filing.
`
`
`
`IPR2022-01006 (Patent 9,665,705 B2)
`IPR2022-01045 (Patent 9,269,208 B2)
`IPR2022-01089 (Patent 9,269,208 B2)
`
`
`On March 28, 2024, we issued a Scheduling Order pursuant to the
`Director’s Review Decision vacating the Board’s Final Written Decisions
`and remanding these three cases to the Board Panel for further proceedings
`consistent with the Director’s Review Decision. See Paper 52 (“Remand
`Scheduling Order”).2 The Remand Scheduling Order did not provide a
`specific date “setting forth the date by which a decision on remand will
`issue.” See Revised Interim Director Review Process (available at
`www.uspto.gov/patents/ptab/decisions/revised-interim-director-review-
`process). 3 Because our Remand Scheduling Order did not provide the
`required “date by which a decision on remand will issue,” we now provide
`
`
`2 Unless otherwise noted, all citations are to papers and exhibits in IPR2022-
`01006. The same Order was filed in each of IPR2022-01045 and IPR2022-
`01089.
`3 Section 5.A.ii.(e) of the Revised Interim Director Review Process states:
`In cases where the Director remands a decision to the Board for
`further proceedings, absent a due date specified in the Director’s
`remand order or extension thereof, the Board has established a
`goal to issue decisions in cases remanded from the Director as
`soon as possible. Even for the most complex records, for
`example, those that may require additional discovery, briefing,
`and/or an oral hearing, the Board’s goal is to issue the decision
`within six months of the date of the remand unless a due date is
`specified in the remand order. Accord SOP 3 (rev 2, formerly
`SOP 9): Procedure for Decisions Remanded from the Federal
`Circuit for Further Proceedings. The procedure and pace of a
`remand will vary depending on the type of case, the legal and
`factual issues involved, the specific instructions from the
`Director, and any other particular circumstances of the case.
`Upon remand, the Board will issue an order setting forth the date
`by which a decision on remand will issue (emphasis added).
`
`2
`
`
`
`IPR2022-01006 (Patent 9,665,705 B2)
`IPR2022-01045 (Patent 9,269,208 B2)
`IPR2022-01089 (Patent 9,269,208 B2)
`
`the required date. A decision on remand in these three proceedings will
`issue on or before September 15, 2024.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`
`
`IPR2022-01006 (Patent 9,665,705 B2)
`IPR2022-01045 (Patent 9,269,208 B2)
`IPR2022-01089 (Patent 9,269,208 B2)
`
`FOR PETITIONER:
`
`Dion Bregman
`Andrew Devkar
`James Kritsas
`MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP
`dion.bregman@morganlewis.com
`andrew.devkar@morganlewis.com
`james.kritsas@morganlewis.com
`
`
`FOR PATENT OWNER:
`
`Michael Rye
`CANTOR COLBURN LLP
`mrye@cantorcolburn.com
`
`
`4
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
