`571-272-7822
`
`
`
`
`Paper 52
`Entered: March 28, 2024
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`
`ASSA ABLOY AB, ASSA ABLOY INC.,
`ASSA ABLOY RESIDENTIAL GROUP, INC.,
`AUGUST HOME, INC.,
`HID GLOBAL CORPORATION, and
`ASSA ABLOY GLOBAL SOLUTIONS, INC.,
`Petitioner,
`v.
`CPC PATENT TECHNOLOGIES PTY, LTD.,
`Patent Owner.
`
`IPR2022-01006 (Patent 9,665,705 B2)
`IPR2022-01045 (Patent 9,269,208 B2)
`IPR2022-01089 (Patent 9,269,208 B2)1
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Before BARRY L. GROSSMAN and AMBER L. HAGY,
`Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`GROSSMAN, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`SCHEDULING ORDER FOLLOWING REMAND
`
`
`
`1 This Order applies to each of the above captioned proceedings. Unless
`specifically authorized by the Board, the parties are not authorized to use
`this style of filing.
`
`
`
`IPR2022-01006 (Patent 9,665,705 B2)
`IPR2022-01045 (Patent 9,269,208 B2)
`IPR2022-01089 (Patent 9,269,208 B2)
`
`
`This Scheduling Order is issued pursuant to the Director’s Review
`Decision vacating the Board’s Final Written Decisions and remanding these
`three cases to the Board Panel for further proceedings consistent with the
`Director’s Review Decision. Paper 49 (“Dir. Dec.” or “Director’s
`Decision”).2 The Director’s Decision states:
`[T]he Board shall authorize Petitioner to file supplemental
`briefing addressing: (1) the Board’s construction for the term
`“biometric signal” in the Final Written Decision and the
`application of the asserted art to the Board’s claim construction,
`and (2) perceived inconsistencies between the Final Written
`Decisions in these proceedings and those in IPR2022-00602 or
`IPR2022-00601, as applicable. The Board shall also authorize
`Patent Owner to file a supplemental response to Petitioner’s
`supplemental brief. After considering such briefing, the Board
`shall issue a new Final Written Decision in each of the captioned
`proceedings that considers the parties’ supplemental briefing
`when resolving the claim construction of “biometric signal,” the
`applicability of the prior art, and arguments as to inconsistency
`with IPR2022-00602 or IPR2022-00601, as applicable.
`Dir. Dec. 7.
`In accordance with the Director’s Decision, Petitioner is authorized to
`file a supplemental brief addressing: (1) the Board’s construction for the
`term “biometric signal” in the Final Written Decision and the application of
`the asserted art to the Board’s claim construction, and (2) perceived
`inconsistencies between the Final Written Decisions in these proceedings
`and those in IPR2022-00602 or IPR2022-00601, as applicable. Petitioner’s
`
`
`2 Unless otherwise noted, all citations are to papers and exhibits in IPR2022-
`01006. The same Order was filed in each of IPR2022-01045 and IPR2022-
`01089 as Paper 44.
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`IPR2022-01006 (Patent 9,665,705 B2)
`IPR2022-01045 (Patent 9,269,208 B2)
`IPR2022-01089 (Patent 9,269,208 B2)
`
`supplemental brief shall not exceed ten (10) pages and otherwise comply
`with all applicable rules for filing papers in IPR proceedings. Petitioner’s
`supplemental brief is due April 12, 2024.
`In accordance with the Director’s Decision, Patent Owner is
`authorized to file a supplemental response to Petitioner’s supplemental brief.
`Patent Owner’s supplemental response shall not exceed ten (10) pages and
`otherwise comply with all applicable rules for filing papers in IPR
`proceedings. Patent Owner’s supplemental response is due April 26, 2024,
`or 14 days after Petitioner’s supplemental brief is filed, whichever is earlier.
`ORDER
`In consideration of the foregoing, it is hereby:
`ORDERED that the parties shall file supplemental briefing in each
`captioned proceeding consistent with the instructions and due dates stated
`above.
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`
`
`IPR2022-01006 (Patent 9,665,705 B2)
`IPR2022-01045 (Patent 9,269,208 B2)
`IPR2022-01089 (Patent 9,269,208 B2)
`
`FOR PETITIONER:
`
`Dion Bregman
`Andrew Devkar
`James Kritsas
`MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP
`dion.bregman@morganlewis.com
`andrew.devkar@morganlewis.com
`james.kritsas@morganlewis.com
`
`FOR PATENT OWNER:
`
`Michael Rye
`CANTOR COLBURN LLP
`mrye@cantorcolburn.com
`
`4
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
