throbber
·1· · · · ·UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`·2· · · · · BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`·3· ·_____________________________________________________
`
`·4· · · · · · · ·SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD.,
`
`·5
`· · · · · · · · · · · · · Petitioner,
`·6
`· · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · ·v.
`·7
`
`·8· · · · · · · SMART MOBILE TECHNOLOGIES, LLC,
`
`·9· · · · · · · · · · · ·Patent Owner.
`· · ·_____________________________________________________
`10
`· · · · ·Case IPR2022-01004 (US Patent No. 9,614,943)
`11· ·_____________________________________________________
`
`12· · · · · · · ·VIDEOCONFERENCE DEPOSITION OF
`
`13· · · · · · · · · ·DR. TODOR V. COOKLEV
`
`14
`· · · · · · · · · · · · ·JUNE 12, 2023
`15
`· · · · · · Page 1 - 107· · · ·8:07 a.m. - 12:22 PST
`16
`
`17
`
`18· ·REPORTED BY:
`· · ·Tamara L. Houston
`19· ·CA CSR No. 7244, RPR, CCRR No. 140
`· · ·Job Number 23-124488
`20· ·Ref. 39843-0128IP1
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`SAMSUNG 1049
`SAMSUNG v. SMART MOBILE
`IPR2022-01004
`
`1
`
`

`

`·1
`
`·2
`
`·3
`
`·4· · · · · · · · · REMOTE VIDEOCONFERENCE DEPOSITION OF
`
`·5· ·DR. TODOR V. COOKLEV, taken on behalf of the
`
`·6· ·Petitioner, commencing from 8:07 a.m. to 12:22 p.m.,
`
`·7· ·Monday, June 12, 2023, before Tamara L. Houston, CSR
`
`·8· ·No. 7244, CCRR, RPR.
`
`·9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`2
`
`

`

`·1· ·APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL:
`
`·2
`
`·3· · · · On behalf of the Petitioner:
`
`·4· · · · · · ·FISH & RICHARDSON, P.C.
`· · · · · · · ·BY:· AAMIR KAZI, ESQ.
`·5· · · · · · · · · SANGKI PARK, ESQ.
`· · · · · · · ·1180 Peachtree Street, NE, 21st Floor
`·6· · · · · · ·Atlanta, Georgia 30309
`· · · · · · · ·kazi@fr.com
`·7· · · · · · ·spark@fr.com
`
`·8
`· · · · · On behalf of the Patent Owner and Witness:
`·9
`· · · · · · · ·GRAVES & SHAW LLP
`10· · · · · · ·BY:· STEVE UDICK, ESQ.
`· · · · · · · · · · PHILIP GRAVES, ESQ.
`11· · · · · · ·355 S. Grand Avenue
`· · · · · · · ·Suite 2450
`12· · · · · · ·Los Angeles, California 90071
`· · · · · · · ·(213) 204-5101
`13· · · · · · ·pgraves@gravesshaw.com
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`3
`
`

`

`·1· · · · · · · · · INDEX TO EXAMINATION
`
`·2· · · · · · · WITNESS:· DR. TODOR V. COOKLEV
`
`·3· ·EXAMINATIONS· · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · ·PAGE
`
`·4· ·Mr. Gree.......................................· ·6
`
`·5
`
`·6
`
`·7· · · · · ·QUESTIONS INSTRUCTED NOT TO ANSWER
`
`·8· · · · · · · · · · ·Page· · ·Line
`
`·9· · · · · · · · · · · · · NONE
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`4
`
`

`

`·1· · · · · · · · · · ·INDEX TO EXHIBITS
`
`·2· · · · · · · · · ·DR. TODOR V. COOKLEV
`
`·3· · · SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO,. LTD. vs. SMART MOBILE
`
`·4· · · · · · · · · · · ·JUNE 12, 2023
`
`·5· · ·Tamara L. Houston, CSR No. 7244, CRR No. 140, RPR
`
`·6
`
`·7· · EXHIBIT· · · · · · ·DESCRIPTION
`
`·8· ·PAGE
`
`·9· · · · · · · · · · · · · --o0o--
`
`10· · · · · · · · · ·(No exhibits marked.)
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`5
`
`

`

`·1· · · · · · · MONDAY, JUNE 12, 2023, 8:07 a.m.
`
`·2· · · · · · · · · · · · · --o0o--
`
`·3· · · · · · · ·All counsel present stipulate
`
`·4· · · · · that the witness shall be sworn remotely
`
`·5· · · · · · · · · ·by the court reporter
`
`·6· · · · · · · · · · · · · · · ·* * *
`
`·7· · · · · · · · · Whereupon, DR. TODOR V. COOKLEV,
`
`·8· · · · · · · · · having been called as a witness was
`
`·9· · · · · · · · · duly sworn to tell the truth, the
`
`10· · · · · · · · · whole truth, and nothing but the truth
`
`11· · · · · · · · · testified as follows: Job number
`
`12· · · · · · · · · · · · · · --o0o--
`
`13· · · · · · · · EXAMINATION BY MR. GREEN:
`
`14· ·BY MR. GREEN:
`
`15· · · · Q.· ·Good evening, Dr. Cooklev.· My name is
`
`16· ·Christopher Green.· We met in the moments before the
`
`17· ·deposition began.· As I believe you understand, I am
`
`18· ·an attorney who represents Samsung in this
`
`19· ·proceeding.· Thank you for appearing for the
`
`20· ·deposition today.
`
`21· · · · · · ·If I may, I know you've been deposed a
`
`22· ·number of times in your career, but I'd like to ask a
`
`23· ·couple of things just to establish our protocols and
`
`24· ·procedures for today's deposition.· We have to do
`
`25· ·them -- some of them every time, so let's begin now.
`
`6
`
`

`

`·1· · · · · · ·The first one is I -- I believe you
`
`·2· ·understand that the oath you just took is the same
`
`·3· ·that you would take if you were appearing in an
`
`·4· ·actual court of law in front of a judge or a jury,
`
`·5· ·and it carries the same weight.
`
`·6· · · · · · ·Can we share that understanding?
`
`·7· · · · A.· ·Yes.
`
`·8· · · · Q.· ·Thank you.· Also, it bears repeating for
`
`·9· ·myself, at least, that our friend, the court
`
`10· ·reporter, is doing her very best to transcribe every
`
`11· ·single word that is said during the deposition.· We
`
`12· ·can help her with that immensely if you will do your
`
`13· ·best to refrain from answering before I finish my
`
`14· ·question.· In return, I need to wait until your
`
`15· ·answer is finished before I ask another question.
`
`16· · · · · · ·Can we cooperate with each other to -- to
`
`17· ·help, you know, create the best, cleanest transcript
`
`18· ·we can?
`
`19· · · · A.· ·Yes.
`
`20· · · · Q.· ·Thank you.· Also, during the course of the
`
`21· ·deposition, your attorney may make some objections.
`
`22· ·Those are procedural matters.· They are not intended
`
`23· ·to prevent you from answering questions.· If a
`
`24· ·question is asked and you give an answer, may I
`
`25· ·understand that you did so in accordance with the
`
`7
`
`

`

`·1· ·oath that you took?
`
`·2· · · · A.· ·Yes.
`
`·3· · · · Q.· ·Okay.· And if you need a clarification for
`
`·4· ·a question, will you ask for it at that time?
`
`·5· · · · A.· ·Yes.· If -- it is my understanding that if
`
`·6· ·I don't understand the question, I can ask for a
`
`·7· ·clarification.
`
`·8· · · · Q.· ·True.· Maybe it is more directed -- if I
`
`·9· ·ask a question and you give me an answer, may I
`
`10· ·understand that you answered the question truthfully
`
`11· ·in accordance with the oath and that you had an
`
`12· ·understanding of the question?
`
`13· · · · A.· ·Yes, I confirm.
`
`14· · · · Q.· ·Okay.· Do you need anything before we begin
`
`15· ·the deposition today?· For example, I know that we're
`
`16· ·working across multiple time zones today.· Is there a
`
`17· ·particular time when you might need a break?· You
`
`18· ·don't need to give me an explanation or a rationale.
`
`19· ·I'll do my best to accommodate.· If it's just to eat
`
`20· ·or to rest or to take a phone call, something like
`
`21· ·that, just let me know a little in advance, and I can
`
`22· ·plan for it.
`
`23· · · · A.· ·Thank you, Counsel.
`
`24· · · · Q.· ·Okay.· In terms of what we are working with
`
`25· ·today, do you have any materials present with you at
`
`8
`
`

`

`·1· ·the deposition -- at the place where you are
`
`·2· ·appearing for the deposition?· Materials relating to
`
`·3· ·this proceeding, I mean.
`
`·4· · · · A.· ·Well, I will explain.· Obviously I am using
`
`·5· ·my computer, and on my computer, there are a lot of
`
`·6· ·documents, but the only thing that I have open right
`
`·7· ·now is the '943 patent.· It's an unmarked copy, but I
`
`·8· ·can close it, and I can work with an exhibit.· Either
`
`·9· ·way is fine.
`
`10· · · · Q.· ·That's not necessary.· What I would ask is
`
`11· ·this:· First, that you confirm there's no one else
`
`12· ·present in the room with you?
`
`13· · · · A.· ·There is no one else present in the room.
`
`14· · · · Q.· ·Okay.· And that you are not using any
`
`15· ·application or other means to communicate with
`
`16· ·someone while we are on the record?
`
`17· · · · A.· ·I am not.
`
`18· · · · Q.· ·And the next thing is that if you have
`
`19· ·materials with you that you reference while you are
`
`20· ·answering a question, that you acknowledge for me
`
`21· ·what that is.· For example, if you have a copy of the
`
`22· ·patent or your declaration or some other item that is
`
`23· ·being used to refresh your recollection or to provide
`
`24· ·information that you are using to help formulate your
`
`25· ·answer, please acknowledge that for me at the time
`
`9
`
`

`

`·1· ·you're doing it.
`
`·2· · · · A.· ·I will be -- I will be clarifying what
`
`·3· ·materials I'm using.· I do not have with me any paper
`
`·4· ·copies of anything.
`
`·5· · · · Q.· ·Very well.· Thank you for your cooperation.
`
`·6· ·All right.
`
`·7· · · · · · ·Okay.· So, Dr. Cooklev, I understand that
`
`·8· ·you have read and I believe understand or have formed
`
`·9· ·a number of opinions about the '943 patent; is that
`
`10· ·fair?
`
`11· · · · A.· ·Yes.
`
`12· · · · Q.· ·And you're aware that the '943 patent is
`
`13· ·part of a larger family of patents?
`
`14· · · · A.· ·I'm aware that the '943 patent is part of a
`
`15· ·group of patents that have been a circuit.
`
`16· · · · Q.· ·And have you read -- have you read, and to
`
`17· ·your own understanding, do you have a grasp of what
`
`18· ·is taught in this family of patents to which the '943
`
`19· ·belongs?
`
`20· · · · A.· ·Gen- -- I mean, I am familiar -- I am
`
`21· ·familiar with the '943 patent in particular for which
`
`22· ·I prepared for today, but -- and, yes, I am familiar
`
`23· ·with what the '943 patent and the rest of the patents
`
`24· ·are about.
`
`25· · · · Q.· ·All right.· I believe from reading your
`
`10
`
`

`

`·1· ·declaration that you have expressed an opinion as to
`
`·2· ·what level of education and experience would
`
`·3· ·constitute a person of ordinary skill in this art; is
`
`·4· ·that fair?
`
`·5· · · · · · ·MR. UDICK:· Objection to form.
`
`·6· · · · · · ·THE WITNESS:· I mean, I -- we can certainly
`
`·7· ·take a look.· I might have -- I might have applied
`
`·8· ·the definition.
`
`·9· ·BY MR. GREEN:
`
`10· · · · Q.· ·I'm glad for you to look at your
`
`11· ·declaration if you need it.
`
`12· · · · A.· ·Okay.
`
`13· · · · Q.· ·My question is not for you to tell me what
`
`14· ·the definition is from memory or anything like that.
`
`15· ·I'm -- I am at this point merely asking the
`
`16· ·following:· Do you recall forming an opinion as to
`
`17· ·what level of education and experience would be
`
`18· ·required for a person to qualify as a person of
`
`19· ·ordinary skill in this art?
`
`20· · · · A.· ·I do recall that I address this question in
`
`21· ·my declaration.
`
`22· · · · Q.· ·Very well.· And as we sit here today, would
`
`23· ·it be your opinion that you, yourself, were a person
`
`24· ·at least of ordinary skill as of the relevant
`
`25· ·timeframes for the '943 patent?
`
`11
`
`

`

`·1· · · · A.· ·Yes.
`
`·2· · · · Q.· ·Okay.· And at the time of -- let's put it
`
`·3· ·this way.· In the late 1990s, were you familiar with
`
`·4· ·the operation of cellular telephone networks?
`
`·5· · · · · · ·MR. UDICK:· Objection to form.
`
`·6· · · · · · ·THE WITNESS:· And I was familiar with a
`
`·7· ·number of aspects, and based on this, I can say yes.
`
`·8· ·BY MR. GREEN:
`
`·9· · · · Q.· ·Okay.· Is one of -- well, withdrawn.
`
`10· · · · · · ·What were some aspects of cellular
`
`11· ·telephone networks that you were familiar with as of
`
`12· ·the late 1990s?
`
`13· · · · A.· ·For example, I was familiar with the GSM --
`
`14· ·the GSM standard and a number of details regarding
`
`15· ·the operation of the GSM standard.· I was also
`
`16· ·familiar with the -- with the standard called IS-95,
`
`17· ·which was a North American standard.· And I -- I was
`
`18· ·familiar with a number of techniques -- signal
`
`19· ·processing techniques that -- that were used.· So
`
`20· ·these are some of the things that I was familiar with
`
`21· ·at the time.
`
`22· · · · Q.· ·Very well.· Are you familiar with the use
`
`23· ·of encryption in cellular telephone networks as of
`
`24· ·the late 1990s?
`
`25· · · · A.· ·Encryption.· I was familiar with encryption
`
`12
`
`

`

`·1· ·because of -- during the 1990s, I did some research
`
`·2· ·in -- research related to --
`
`·3· · · · · · ·(Whereupon the court reporter requested
`
`·4· ·clarification.)
`
`·5· · · · · · ·THE WITNESS:· -- abstract algebra and
`
`·6· ·number theory as with applications -- with
`
`·7· ·applications including applications in encryption and
`
`·8· ·also algorithms related to these with applications in
`
`·9· ·encryption.· I do not exactly recall right now being
`
`10· ·familiar with encryption specifically for cellular
`
`11· ·telephone systems.
`
`12· ·BY MR. GREEN:
`
`13· · · · Q.· ·To your knowledge, was encryption or
`
`14· ·encryption techniques used in cellular telephone
`
`15· ·networks as of 1999?
`
`16· · · · A.· ·Excuse me.· I did not get the question.
`
`17· · · · Q.· ·No problem at all.
`
`18· · · · · · ·From your recollection, was the technique
`
`19· ·of data encryption used in cellular telephone
`
`20· ·networks as of 1999?
`
`21· · · · A.· ·You know, I do not -- do not remember right
`
`22· ·now.
`
`23· · · · Q.· ·Do you recall whether any specifications or
`
`24· ·protocols for cellular telephone communication that
`
`25· ·existed as of 1999 incorporated any description of
`
`13
`
`

`

`·1· ·data encryption?
`
`·2· · · · A.· ·No.· At the moment, I do not recall whether
`
`·3· ·any protocols for cellular telephony just referenced
`
`·4· ·encryption.· I just -- at the moment, I just do not
`
`·5· ·recall.
`
`·6· · · · Q.· ·Are you familiar with any form of wireless
`
`·7· ·network that existed as of 1999 and that incorporated
`
`·8· ·data encryption?
`
`·9· · · · A.· ·What kind of encryption?
`
`10· · · · Q.· ·Data encryption.
`
`11· · · · A.· ·Better?
`
`12· · · · Q.· ·Data.
`
`13· · · · A.· ·Oh, data encryption.
`
`14· · · · · · ·No.· I do not remember as far as the late
`
`15· ·'90s.
`
`16· · · · Q.· ·Okay.· As we sit here today, do you have
`
`17· ·any recollection of any form of wireless network that
`
`18· ·existed after 1999 incorporating data encryption?
`
`19· · · · · · ·MR. UDICK:· Objection to form.
`
`20· · · · · · ·THE WITNESS:· No.· I -- I just -- I do not
`
`21· ·recall at the moment.· I think my recollection as far
`
`22· ·as data encryption being used in wireless networks
`
`23· ·starts around 2001 -- the 2001 timeframe.· It's
`
`24· ·just -- it's just at the moment my recollection.
`
`25· ·BY MR. GREEN:
`
`14
`
`

`

`·1· · · · Q.· ·Okay.· Are you familiar with any form of
`
`·2· ·communication networks that existed as of 1999 and
`
`·3· ·that incorporated data encryption?
`
`·4· · · · A.· ·No.· I -- I -- I do not recall -- I don't
`
`·5· ·think I have opined on this, and sitting here right
`
`·6· ·now, I cannot recall any wireless networks that used
`
`·7· ·data encryption.
`
`·8· · · · Q.· ·Okay.· But just to clarify, my question was
`
`·9· ·this:· Do you recall any form of communication
`
`10· ·network, wireless or otherwise, that incorporated
`
`11· ·data encryption as of 1999?
`
`12· · · · · · ·MR. UDICK:· Objection to form.
`
`13· · · · · · ·THE WITNESS:· Any recollection would be --
`
`14· ·sitting here right now would be vague for me to give
`
`15· ·you a -- to give you any formed answer right now
`
`16· ·under oath.· I just do not recall.
`
`17· ·BY MR. GREEN:
`
`18· · · · Q.· ·Can you remind me what type of work you did
`
`19· ·relating to data encryption at the earlier time in
`
`20· ·your career, specifically during the 1990s?
`
`21· · · · A.· ·Yes.· So one approach to encryption is
`
`22· ·based on multiplying two numbers and a -- you know,
`
`23· ·appropriately chosen.· So I worked on fast algorithms
`
`24· ·for -- for multiplication of -- as used in
`
`25· ·encryption.· And encryption also -- and what was also
`
`15
`
`

`

`·1· ·important is that it is factorization, the inverse
`
`·2· ·problem of multiplication that factorization is -- is
`
`·3· ·hard.
`
`·4· · · · · · ·And so my work was on -- centered on fast
`
`·5· ·algorithms and the application of -- of innovative
`
`·6· ·number theory in these algorithms.
`
`·7· · · · Q.· ·So would you agree with me that there
`
`·8· ·existed numerous algorithms for performing different
`
`·9· ·types of data encryption as of 1999?
`
`10· · · · · · ·MR. UDICK:· Objection to form.
`
`11· · · · · · ·THE WITNESS:· Would I agree that there
`
`12· ·existed numerous algorithms?
`
`13· ·BY MR. GREEN:
`
`14· · · · Q.· ·I mean, in a -- let me withdraw that
`
`15· ·question, if I may, and ask a better question, or at
`
`16· ·least a different one.
`
`17· · · · · · ·The approach that you just described for
`
`18· ·performing data encryption, that was not the only
`
`19· ·technique for performing data encryption that existed
`
`20· ·as of 1999; is that fair?
`
`21· · · · A.· ·I think that's fair.
`
`22· · · · Q.· ·Okay.· And would it be fair to say that
`
`23· ·there were numerous types of data encryption
`
`24· ·techniques that existed as of 1999?
`
`25· · · · A.· ·I think in a -- in a certain sense, that
`
`16
`
`

`

`·1· ·would be a fair statement.
`
`·2· · · · Q.· ·What is the purpose of performing data
`
`·3· ·encryption?
`
`·4· · · · · · ·MR. UDICK:· Objection to form.
`
`·5· · · · · · ·THE WITNESS:· So I will -- will -- first, I
`
`·6· ·would say that -- just to give a little more context,
`
`·7· ·that I -- I don't recall opining on this, but I will
`
`·8· ·try to give you an answer right now.
`
`·9· · · · · · ·So as a general idea -- and I don't want to
`
`10· ·give definitions or anything like that, but as a
`
`11· ·general idea, the purpose of encryption is to make
`
`12· ·sure that only the intended recipient can make sense
`
`13· ·of what is being sent.
`
`14· ·BY MR. GREEN:
`
`15· · · · Q.· ·So when you say is the purpose of
`
`16· ·encryption is to make sure that only the recipient
`
`17· ·can make sense of what is being sent, are you
`
`18· ·referring to using data encryption as a form of
`
`19· ·security?
`
`20· · · · · · ·MR. UDICK:· Objection to form.
`
`21· · · · · · ·THE WITNESS:· I think -- I think in a
`
`22· ·certain sense we can say that.
`
`23· ·BY MR. GREEN:
`
`24· · · · Q.· ·Okay.· And earlier when we were discussing
`
`25· ·data encryption and work you had yourself performed
`
`17
`
`

`

`·1· ·related to data encryption, you described a number of
`
`·2· ·mathematical operations or mathematical techniques.
`
`·3· · · · · · ·Did I understand that correctly?
`
`·4· · · · A.· ·Yes.
`
`·5· · · · Q.· ·Okay.· Is it necessary to form mathematical
`
`·6· ·operations or computations to implement at least some
`
`·7· ·forms of data encryption?
`
`·8· · · · · · ·MR. UDICK:· Objection.· Form and scope.
`
`·9· · · · · · ·THE WITNESS:· Yes.· To the -- the way that
`
`10· ·I understand the question, yes, mathematical
`
`11· ·operations -- some mathematical operations are
`
`12· ·generally necessary in performing encryption.
`
`13· ·BY MR. GREEN:
`
`14· · · · Q.· ·Okay.· Did a computerized system with
`
`15· ·electronic components -- well, withdrawn.
`
`16· · · · · · ·What types of electronic components perform
`
`17· ·the mathematical operations or algorithms that are
`
`18· ·necessary to implement data encryption?
`
`19· · · · · · ·MR. UDICK:· Objection to form and scope.
`
`20· ·BY MR. GREEN:
`
`21· · · · Q.· ·You may answer.
`
`22· · · · A.· ·The electronic components that perform
`
`23· ·these operations, there -- there could be several
`
`24· ·types.· One type is as part of a dedicated digital
`
`25· ·chip.
`
`18
`
`

`

`·1· · · · Q.· ·I don't know if you're finished.· I don't
`
`·2· ·want to have an incredibly awkward silence for too
`
`·3· ·long.
`
`·4· · · · A.· ·I'm done with -- I'm done with the answer.
`
`·5· · · · Q.· ·Okay.· So when you say there could be
`
`·6· ·several types of electronic components that perform
`
`·7· ·the mathematical operations associated with
`
`·8· ·encryption and one of those types is a dedicated
`
`·9· ·digital chip, what are some other types of electronic
`
`10· ·components?
`
`11· · · · · · ·MR. UDICK:· Objection to form.
`
`12· · · · · · ·THE WITNESS:· Just as another example,
`
`13· ·encryption can be implemented in software.
`
`14· ·BY MR. GREEN:
`
`15· · · · Q.· ·In addition to dedicated digital chips and
`
`16· ·software, what other types of components can perform
`
`17· ·data encryption?
`
`18· · · · · · ·MR. UDICK:· Objection to form and scope.
`
`19· · · · · · ·THE WITNESS:· Well, although -- I -- I
`
`20· ·don't want to say that there are no other types. I
`
`21· ·mean, I -- just in general there could be some other
`
`22· ·types, but I think these are two main ones.
`
`23· ·BY MR. GREEN:
`
`24· · · · Q.· ·Okay.· When persons of ordinary skill in
`
`25· ·the art use the term "processor," is a processor a
`
`19
`
`

`

`·1· ·form of a dedicated digital chip in some
`
`·2· ·applications?
`
`·3· · · · · · ·MR. UDICK:· Objection to form and scope.
`
`·4· · · · · · ·THE WITNESS:· A processor is not considered
`
`·5· ·a dedicated digital chip because a dedicated chip is
`
`·6· ·dedicated for -- for one particular task.· That's --
`
`·7· ·that is the dedicated part.· And a processor, in
`
`·8· ·general, is -- is more versatile.
`
`·9· ·BY MR. GREEN:
`
`10· · · · Q.· ·Is a processor a form of digital chip?
`
`11· · · · A.· ·It is a processor digital chip -- it -- a
`
`12· ·processor is a digital chip.
`
`13· · · · Q.· ·Okay.· Are there some forms of processors
`
`14· ·that incorporate functionality for performing data
`
`15· ·encryption among other tasks?
`
`16· · · · · · ·MR. UDICK:· Objection to form and scope.
`
`17· · · · · · ·THE WITNESS:· Well, is your question
`
`18· ·related to the 1999 timeframe?
`
`19· ·BY MR. GREEN:
`
`20· · · · Q.· ·That's a fair clarification.· Please allow
`
`21· ·me to incorporate that into my question.
`
`22· · · · · · ·As of 1999, were there processors that were
`
`23· ·capable of forming -- performing multiple types of
`
`24· ·tasks?
`
`25· · · · · · ·MR. UDICK:· Objection to form and scope.
`
`20
`
`

`

`·1· · · · · · ·THE WITNESS:· Well, as far as multiple
`
`·2· ·tasks, just in the general sense, yes, processors
`
`·3· ·were -- around 1999, they were capable of more than
`
`·4· ·one task.
`
`·5· ·BY MR. GREEN:
`
`·6· · · · Q.· ·Am I correct that as of 1999, persons of
`
`·7· ·ordinary skill understood that, when designing an
`
`·8· ·electronic system, they could choose from both
`
`·9· ·general-purpose processors and dedicated or
`
`10· ·application-specific processors?
`
`11· · · · · · ·MR. UDICK:· Objection.· Form and scope.
`
`12· · · · · · ·THE WITNESS:· First, I -- I think the term
`
`13· ·is "application-specific integrated circuits."
`
`14· ·BY MR. GREEN:
`
`15· · · · Q.· ·Like ASIC, I believe you mean.
`
`16· · · · A.· ·Right.· ASIC or ASIC.· I think that's the
`
`17· ·term.
`
`18· · · · Q.· ·Let me withdraw then and ask a more
`
`19· ·specific question that doesn't set up any potential
`
`20· ·misunderstanding about terminology.
`
`21· · · · · · ·Am I correct -- my question is this:· Am I
`
`22· ·correct that as of 1999 individuals designing
`
`23· ·electronic communication systems could choose from
`
`24· ·general-purpose processors and processors dedicated
`
`25· ·to a specific purpose to implement the features and
`
`21
`
`

`

`·1· ·functions of the system?
`
`·2· · · · · · ·MR. UDICK:· Objection to form and scope.
`
`·3· · · · · · ·THE WITNESS:· As far as the terms,
`
`·4· ·certainly general-purpose processors processors were
`
`·5· ·known in 1999.· The application-specific integrated
`
`·6· ·circuits or, as I said earlier, dedicated digital
`
`·7· ·chips just for -- to avoid confusion, at least they
`
`·8· ·were not referred to as a processor.· But they were
`
`·9· ·an alternative digital technology.
`
`10· ·BY MR. GREEN:
`
`11· · · · Q.· ·ASICs or dedicated digital chips, as you're
`
`12· ·referring to them, they existed as of 1999?
`
`13· · · · · · ·MR. UDICK:· Objection.· Scope.
`
`14· · · · · · ·THE WITNESS:· And, Counsel, I'm -- I'm
`
`15· ·doing my best to answer truthfully all questions.
`
`16· ·Obviously questions which I have not opined, I just
`
`17· ·need a little -- just a moment to think.
`
`18· ·BY MR. GREEN:
`
`19· · · · Q.· ·It's okay.· You may take the moment if you
`
`20· ·need it.· And I'll re-ask my question so it's clear
`
`21· ·and you have it in your mind so that you can use your
`
`22· ·best recollection, which is all I can ask for.
`
`23· · · · · · ·So here is my question:· As a person who
`
`24· ·has some significant education and experience in this
`
`25· ·field and who was a person of at least ordinary skill
`
`22
`
`

`

`·1· ·as of 1999, do you recall the existence of
`
`·2· ·application-specific integrated processors or
`
`·3· ·dedicated digital chips, as you have called them, as
`
`·4· ·of 1999?
`
`·5· · · · · · ·MR. UDICK:· Same objection.
`
`·6· · · · · · ·THE WITNESS:· I -- I relate -- to the best
`
`·7· ·of my recollection right now, I think
`
`·8· ·application-specific integrated circuits did exist in
`
`·9· ·1999.· And, again, it is my -- it is my best
`
`10· ·recollection right now.
`
`11· ·BY MR. GREEN:
`
`12· · · · Q.· ·Okay.· Are you familiar, generally, with
`
`13· ·how persons of ordinary skill in the art created
`
`14· ·schematics or diagrams of electronic systems as of
`
`15· ·1999?
`
`16· · · · A.· ·Schematics.· Well, regarding schematics, I
`
`17· ·think I -- I was familiar --
`
`18· · · · Q.· ·You were --
`
`19· · · · A.· ·-- sufficiently to say that, yes, I was
`
`20· ·familiar with this.
`
`21· · · · Q.· ·Okay.· All right.· May I ask another
`
`22· ·question then about schematics or diagrams?
`
`23· · · · A.· ·Sure.
`
`24· · · · Q.· ·Well, okay.· Before I do it, it may be
`
`25· ·worth noting that as someone that suffered through
`
`23
`
`

`

`·1· ·electronic school myself, it's almost impossible to
`
`·2· ·have a conversation with an electrical engineer and
`
`·3· ·not use the word "scheme" or "schematic," but -- and
`
`·4· ·we've proven that today, I think.
`
`·5· · · · · · ·So with that, let me -- let me go on and
`
`·6· ·ask this question.· My question is this:· If a person
`
`·7· ·of ordinary skill in the 1999 timeframe were
`
`·8· ·designing an electronic system and that system had
`
`·9· ·features or functions that required an
`
`10· ·application-specific integrated processor or one of
`
`11· ·these dedicated digital chips, as you would call
`
`12· ·them, would you expect that person to have called it
`
`13· ·out on the diagram or the schematic for the system so
`
`14· ·that others trying to implement the system would know
`
`15· ·that component was needed?
`
`16· · · · · · ·MR. UDICK:· Objection to form and scope.
`
`17· · · · · · ·THE WITNESS:· And maybe -- I was trying to
`
`18· ·listen very carefully.· Not sure if it was the audio
`
`19· ·or the question was a little bit long.· I would ask
`
`20· ·the question to be repeated, please.
`
`21· ·BY MR. GREEN:
`
`22· · · · Q.· ·Of course.· Let me try to simplify the
`
`23· ·question.
`
`24· · · · · · ·In a situation where a person of ordinary
`
`25· ·skill -- perhaps an engineer -- is designing a system
`
`24
`
`

`

`·1· ·that requires a very particular type of component
`
`·2· ·such as an application-specific integrated circuit,
`
`·3· ·would you normally expect that person to call out the
`
`·4· ·need or the presence for that ASIC on the schematics
`
`·5· ·and diagrams that go with the system?
`
`·6· · · · · · ·MR. UDICK:· Same objections.
`
`·7· · · · · · ·THE WITNESS:· You know, I think the
`
`·8· ·accurate answer is that not in all circumstances.
`
`·9· ·BY MR. GREEN:
`
`10· · · · Q.· ·Okay.· Earlier you mentioned that data
`
`11· ·encryption can be performed by software -- or in
`
`12· ·software; is that fair?
`
`13· · · · A.· ·Yes.
`
`14· · · · Q.· ·On what types of electronic components are
`
`15· ·the instructions embedded in software for data
`
`16· ·encryption performed?
`
`17· · · · · · ·MR. UDICK:· Objection to form and scope.
`
`18· · · · · · ·THE WITNESS:· It could be a general purpose
`
`19· ·process.
`
`20· ·BY MR. GREEN:
`
`21· · · · Q.· ·Okay.· Okay.· Earlier you mentioned, I
`
`22· ·think, what we agreed to be security as one benefit
`
`23· ·of performing data encryption.
`
`24· · · · · · ·Can you think of other benefits that go
`
`25· ·along with performing data encryption, particularly
`
`25
`
`

`

`·1· ·in communication networks?
`
`·2· · · · · · ·MR. UDICK:· Objection to form and scope.
`
`·3· · · · · · ·THE WITNESS:· You know, I think -- and
`
`·4· ·first -- and we'll set security in a certain sense.
`
`·5· ·It is -- it is security, and I think it's a big one.
`
`·6· ·At the moment, I cannot think of any other benefits.
`
`·7· ·BY MR. GREEN:
`
`·8· · · · Q.· ·As we sit here today, are you familiar with
`
`·9· ·any communication systems where the transmitter --
`
`10· ·well, withdrawn.
`
`11· · · · · · ·As we sit here today, are you familiar with
`
`12· ·any communication systems that existed as of -- I'm
`
`13· ·sorry, my question -- let me re-ask.
`
`14· · · · · · ·My question is this:· As we sit here today,
`
`15· ·are you familiar with any wireless communication
`
`16· ·systems that existed as of 1999 where data encryption
`
`17· ·was performed by the transmitter component?
`
`18· · · · A.· ·I think I -- I think I answered that I --
`
`19· ·right now, I do not recall specific examples of
`
`20· ·communication systems performing encryption around
`
`21· ·1999.· It's just because I did not investigate, and
`
`22· ·so I cannot right now say whether the transmitter was
`
`23· ·doing encryption.
`
`24· · · · Q.· ·As we sit here today, are you familiar with
`
`25· ·any communication systems that existed as of 1999
`
`26
`
`

`

`·1· ·where the receiver component was the component
`
`·2· ·responsible for performing data encryption?
`
`·3· · · · · · ·MR. UDICK:· Objection to form and scope.
`
`·4· · · · · · ·THE WITNESS:· Generally, again, my answer
`
`·5· ·would be that I just don't recall investigating this,
`
`·6· ·and when -- when -- if and when necessary, I can
`
`·7· ·investigate this.· But right now, I do not recall any
`
`·8· ·examples, and I'm not aware of the receivers
`
`·9· ·performing the appropriate pro- -- the appropriate
`
`10· ·processing in connection with encryption.
`
`11· ·BY MR. GREEN:
`
`12· · · · Q.· ·As we -- for systems that exist as of 1999,
`
`13· ·are there any particular reasons why data encryption
`
`14· ·would have been performed in components other than
`
`15· ·the transmitter or the receiver?
`
`16· · · · · · ·MR. UDICK:· Objection to form and scope.
`
`17· · · · · · ·THE WITNESS:· Well, for your question,
`
`18· ·it's -- you know, it depends how do we define the
`
`19· ·transmitter and the receiver and what -- what do they
`
`20· ·include?
`
`21· ·BY MR. GREEN:
`
`22· · · · Q.· ·What do you mean?
`
`23· · · · A.· ·Well, I mean that the answer to your
`
`24· ·question depends on what -- what do we consider as
`
`25· ·the transmitter and what do we consider as the
`
`27
`
`

`

`·1· ·receiver?· But it's possible that -- at least
`
`·2· ·conceptually, it's possible that encryption is
`
`·3· ·performed by another component.
`
`·4· · · · Q.· ·When you say it's conceptually possible
`
`·5· ·that encryption is performed by another component, do
`
`·6· ·you mean another component besides the transmitter
`
`·7· ·and the receiver?
`
`·8· · · · A.· ·Excuse me.· I didn't -- another component
`
`·9· ·does what?
`
`10· · · · Q.· ·I'm not limiting you -- when you describe
`
`11· ·that it's possible that -- at least conceptually
`
`12· ·possible that encryption is performed by another
`
`13· ·component, did you mean another component to refer to
`
`14· ·something other than a transmitter or a receiver?
`
`15· · · · A.· ·Yes.
`
`16· · · · Q.· ·All right.· Thank you.· I was just trying
`
`17· ·to make sure I was following along.· Perfect.
`
`18· · · · · · ·All right.· Do you have a copy of the Byrne
`
`19· ·reference, B-Y-R-N-E?
`
`20· · · · A.· ·I do.
`
`21· · · · Q.· ·Okay.· So for the record, the Byrne
`
`22· ·reference was previously marked as Exhibit 1008. I
`
`23· ·will understand that you are looking at your
`
`24· ·electronic copy, which is unannotated and unmarked;
`
`25· ·is that fair?
`
`28
`
`

`

`·1· · · · A.· ·Yes.· That is fair.· My electronic copy is
`
`·2· ·unmarked.· I'm looking at Exhibit 1008, which is
`
`·3· ·Byrne's.
`
`·4· · · · Q.· ·Would you look at Column 8, lines 29
`
`·5· ·through 38 of Byrne, Exhibit 1008, please?
`
`·6· · · · · · ·(Whereupon the court reporter requested
`
`·7· ·clarification.)
`
`·8· ·BY MR. GREEN:
`
`·9· · · · Q.· ·8, lines 29 to 38 of the Byrne reference,
`
`10· ·which is Exhibit 1008.
`
`11· · · · A.· ·I am there.
`
`12· · · · Q.· ·Okay.· Would you read into the record the
`
`13· ·sentence that begins, "The microprocessor 210
`
`14· ·controls the CCT 200"?
`
`15· · · · A.· ·"The microprocessor 210 controls the
`
`16· ·CCT 200 in a similar way when operating as a cellular
`
`17· ·telephone but appropriately modified for the
`
`18· ·signaling protocols and data encryption used in the
`
`19· ·cellular system."
`
`20· · · · Q.· ·Okay.· And I believe that next sentence in
`
`21· ·the passage that you just read from Byrne goes on to
`
`22· ·say, "The signaling protocols, data encryption
`
`23· ·techniques, and the like used in respective telephone
`
`24· ·systems are well known in the art, and the
`
`25· ·microprocessor can be arranged to operate in a known
`
`29
`
`

`

`·1· ·manner to affect control of the signals in such
`
`·2· ·systems."
`
`·3· · · · · · ·Do you see that sentence?
`
`·4· · · · A.· ·Yes, I see that.
`
`·5· · · · Q.· ·Okay.· Would you agree with me that the
`
`·6· ·passage in Column 8, lines 29 through 38 of the Byrne
`
`·7· ·reference, describe the performance of data
`
`·8· ·encryption in a cellular communication network?
`
`·9· · · · · · ·MR. UDICK:· Objection to form.
`
`10· ·BY MR. GREEN:
`
`11· · · · Q.· ·Let me be more specific.· Would you agree
`
`12· ·with me that the passage we just read together from
`
`13· ·Column 8, lines 29 through 38 of the Byrne reference,
`
`14· ·describes a mobile device, such as a phone, that
`
`15· ·per

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket