`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`
`FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
`
`
`
`
`SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD.
`AND SAMSUNG SEMICONDUCTOR,
`INC.
`
`
`)
`)
`)
`
`)
`
`)
` C.A. No. 21-1453-RGA
`)
`
`)
`
`)
`
`)
`
`)
`
`)
`
`
`
`
`DEFENDANT NETLIST, INC.’S MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS’
`FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT (D.I. 14)
`
`Plaintiffs,
`
`
`
`v.
`
`
`NETLIST, INC.,
`
` Defendant.
`
`
`
`Pursuant to Rule 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure,
`
`Defendant Netlist, Inc. (“Netlist”), by and through its undersigned counsel, hereby moves to
`
`dismiss the First Amended Complaint for Declaratory Judgment of Non-infringement and
`
`Unenforceability; Breach of Contract (D.I. 14) filed by Plaintiffs Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
`
`and Samsung Semiconductor, Inc., for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and failure to state a
`
`claim on which relief can be granted. Netlist’s motion is supported by the Opening Brief filed
`
`herewith and the exhibits attached hereto.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Dated: February 16, 2022
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`
`/s/ Karen E. Keller
`Karen E. Keller (No. 4489)
`SHAW KELLER LLP
`I.M. Pei Building
`1105 N Market St, 12th Floor
`Wilmington, Delaware 19801
`(302) 298-0700
`kkeller@shawkeller.com
`Attorneys for Defendant Netlist, Inc.
`
`
`
`Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
`Ex. 1070, p. 1
`
`
`
`Case 1:21-cv-01453-RGA Document 24-1 Filed 02/16/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 6099
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`
`FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
`
`
`
`
`SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD.
`AND SAMSUNG SEMICONDUCTOR,
`INC.
`
`
`)
`)
`)
`
`)
`
`)
` C.A. No. 21-1453-RGA
`)
`
`)
`
`)
`
`)
`
`)
`
`)
`
`
`
`
`[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT NETLIST, INC.’S MOTION TO
`DISMISS PLAINTIFFS’ FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT (D.I. 14)
`
`Plaintiffs,
`
`
`
`v.
`
`
`NETLIST, INC.,
`
` Defendant.
`
`
`
`Upon consideration of Defendant Netlist, Inc.’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs’ First
`
`Amended Complaint (D.I. 14) (the “Motion”), the opening brief, and exhibits submitted therewith,
`
`IT IS HERBY ORDERED THAT the Motion is GRANTED, and Plaintiffs Samsung
`
`Electronics Co., Ltd. and Samsung Semiconductor, Inc.’s claims in the First Amended Complaint
`
`for Declaratory Judgment of Non-infringement and Unenforceability; Breach of Contract (D.I. 14)
`
`are DISMISSED with prejudice and without leave to amend.
`
`
`
`SO ORDERED this ___________ day of _____________ 2022.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`_________________________________
` The Honorable Richard G. Andrews
`United States District Judge
`
`
`
`Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
`Ex. 1070, p. 2
`
`