throbber
A forum for the exchange of circuits, systems, and software for real-world signal processing
`
`Volume 40, Number 2, 2006
`
`In This Issue
`Editors’ Notes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
`Oscar Stirs [The Wit and Wisdom of Dr. Leif—3] . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
`Class D Audio Amplifiers: What, Why, and How . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
`Power-Supply Management—Principles, Problems, and Parts . . . . . . . . . 13
`Design Your Own VoIP Solution with a Blackfin Processor—
`Add Enhancements Later . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17
`Product Introductions and Authors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23
`
`www.analog.com/analogdialogue
`
`Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
`Ex. 1062, p. 1
`
`

`

`Editors’ Notes
`ANNIVERSARY
`As faithful readers already know (and are perhaps
`weary of knowing!), Analog Dialogue is
`celebrating our 40th anniversary in print. But there
`is another significant anniversary to celebrate:
`Exactly 20 years ago, in Volume 20, No. 2 (1986),
`we broke with our purely analog past and introduced
`the first Analog Devices digital signal processor
`(DSP), the ADSP-2100. You may be interested in
`recalling the theme of the Editor’s Note welcoming
`our readers to that issue:
`
`ANALOG & DIGITAL
`“Microprocessor?” we hear you ask. “Isn’t
`it a bit unseemly for a nice ‘Analog’ IC
`company to be designing a microprocessor?
`(What could be more digital?)”
`Good question.
`Our objective has always been to design and
`manufacture cost-effective components that are key elements of
`the signal path for processing real-world (i.e., analog) data and
`for which performance is maximized and errors minimized.
`The signal path? Real-world data almost always starts out as
`analog (i.e., parallel, nonnumeric) variables, which are measured
`by sensors that provide analog electrical signals—voltage and
`current. The signals must be accurately and speedily amplified,
`conditioned (almost always in parallel), and converted to digital
`for processing. Once in digital form, they must be processed
`rapidly. Often, they again wind up as analog signals.
`Key elements of the signal path include preamplifiers, analog
`signal processors, data converters to and from digital, and—when
`the signal is in digital form—a digital processor. Inadequacy in
`any one of the key elements—amplifier, analog processor, data
`converter, or microprocessor—can cause poor performance of
`the overall system.
`Obstacles in the signal path include noise, drift, nonlinearity,
`and measurement lag at the analog stages, similar obstacles
`in conversion—and throughput delays in digital processing,
`often because of the lack of parallelism in von Neumann
`architecture.
`Throughout our history, our role in the signal path has been to
`initiate new products (or product lines) when dissatisfied with
`the cost-effectiveness of what’s available (which is often limited
`to user-assembled kludges, when nothing else is available).
`At this point in time, we (and our competitors) have virtually
`eliminated the user-assembled amplifier, signal conditioner,
`and data converter by designing and marketing families of
`cost-effective products.
`We have always been dissatisfied with the cost, power dissipation,
`and slow throughput in the digital domain; this concern led
`to our pioneering development of CMOS multipliers and
`other digital signal-processing ICs (note that because we were
`already familiar with analog multipliers, digital multipliers
`became just another analog signal-processing tool; note also
`our commitment to signal processing—not payroll, desktop
`publishing, or order-handling products). Our dissatisfaction
`with the complexity of systems using Bit-Slice parts led to the
`powerful and compact Wordslice™ microcoded system parts.
`And finally, our dissatisfaction with insufficient throughput in
`DSP processors led to design of the ADSP-2100, which stresses
`the use of that analog characteristic, parallelism, to minimize
`instruction cycles, whether in processing, data transfer, or
`interrupt handling. It’s neat! We invite you to read about it.
`
`Dan Sheingold [dan.sheingold@analog.com]
`
`RANDOM THOUGHTS ON THIS ISSUE
`Dr. Leif’s World—And Ours
`In this issue, enjoy Oscar Stirs, part three of
`Niku’s quest to understand the start-up phase
`of an ideal oscillator. In Dr. Leif’s world, the
`effects of global warming have already been felt,
`yet there is hope for the future. Is our outlook
`as bright, or will some of the cataclysmic events
`experienced in Niku’s lifetime become reality
`in ours? Everyone should see the intentionally
`biased movie, An Inconvenient Truth, regardless of their current views
`on global warming. At the very least it will make them wonder about
`how robust or fragile our environment is and question what they read
`in the popular press. Some may be motivated to act by reducing their
`own impact on our ecosystem or becoming advocates for change. For
`more information, and some simple suggestions for becoming carbon
`neutral, visit http://yosemite.epa.gov/oar/globalwarming.nsf.
`VoIP—Pro and Con
`After using VoIP for about two years, I finally cut my personal ties
`with Ma Bell. For less than 20 dollars a month I got everything that
`was previously provided by my land line, plus a lot more. Some of the
`cool features include voice mail messages sent via email, allowing me
`to access them from any PC, and the ability to reject anonymous calls
`without being forced to jump up and check the caller ID. In addition,
`I can make unlimited calls to the US and Canada, and limited free
`international calls. So, what’s the downside? Well, even with 8 Mbps
`Internet access and 92% quality of service (QoS), the voice quality,
`noise level, and echo rejection are not as good as with the wired phone.
`Also, a call is occasionally dropped, something I never experienced with
`the land line. Furthermore, I’d lose my VoIP connection in the event
`of a power failure, in contrast to the always-up reliability of the plain
`old telephone system (POTS). With a cell phone as a backup, though,
`VoIP is a smart choice. In this issue, read about implementing VoIP on
`a Blackfin processor.
`Power-Supply Management
`With today’s portable devices and green appliances, power consumption
`must be kept to a minimum, yet complex consumer electronics
`equipment often requires multiple power supplies for the analog
`circuitry, memory, microprocessors, DSPs, and ASICs. These supplies
`must be turned on and off in sequence to avoid damage to their
`associated components, with timeouts occurring in the event of a system
`fault. All of this increases the importance of integrated power-supply
`management. In this issue, learn the basics of the problem and of the
`available solutions.
`Class D Amplifiers
`Class D amplifiers provide the advantages of higher efficiency,
`smaller size, and lower cost, while still achieving low distortion,
`wide dynamic range, and clickless muting. Recently, everyone seems
`to be writing about Class D. After reading the article in this issue,
`you may also be interested in reading “How Class D Amplifiers
`Work” by Jun Honda and Jonathan Adams, “Design and Analysis
`of a Basic Class D Amplifier” by Chi Ho Li, and “Class D in Audio
`Hubs Extends Battery Life” by Robert Hatfield. All can be found
`at http://www.audiodesignline.com.
`Scott Wayne [scott.wayne@analog.com]
`
`dialogue.editor@analog.com
`www.analog.com/analogdialogue
`Analog Dialogue is the free technical magazine of Analog Devices, Inc., published
`continuously for 40 years—starting in 1967. It discusses products, applications,
`technology, and techniques for analog, digital, and mixed-signal processing. It is
`currently published in two editions—online, monthly at the above URL, and quarterly
`in print, as periodic retrospective collections of articles that have appeared online. In
`addition to technical articles, the online edition has timely announcements, linking to
`data sheets of newly released and pre-release products, and “Potpourri”—a universe
`of links to important and rapidly proliferating sources of relevant information
`and activity on the Analog Devices website and elsewhere. The Analog Dialogue
`site is, in effect, a “high-pass-filtered” point of entry to the www.analog.com
`site—the virtual world of Analog Devices. In addition to all its current information,
`the Analog Dialogue site has archives with all recent editions, starting from Volume
`17, Number 1 (1983), plus three special anniversary issues, containing useful articles
`extracted from earlier editions, going all the way back to Volume 1, Number 1.
`If you wish to subscribe to—or receive copies of—the print edition, please go to
`www.analog.com/analogdialogue and click on <subscribe>. Your comments
`are always welcome; please send messages to dialogue.editor@analog.com
`or to these individuals: Dan Sheingold, Editor [dan.sheingold@analog.com]
`or Scott Wayne, Managing Editor and Publisher [scott.wayne@analog.com].
`
`ISSN 0161-3626 ©Analog Devices, Inc. 2006
`
`Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
`Ex. 1062, p. 2
`
`

`

`OSCAR STIRS
`[The Wit and Wisdom of Dr. Leif—3]
`By Barrie Gilbert [barrie.gilbert@analog.com]
`Back in her small apartment, Niku tossed two units of MycoPro
`into the hyperphase and settled to watching the top stories on the
`TransGlobal Network (TGN, Channel 28.20.20). She was feeling
`upbeat. After weeks of orientation at ADI, she’d just been given
`her first real assignment as a Product Originator. From the initial
`discussions, it didn’t appear that her contributions to this mixed-
`signal ASIC, a new type of monitor of deep-ocean conditions for
`the International Oceanic Authority, would require much in the
`way of “original” design; but she was excited at the prospect of
`finally doing something productive, working under the guidance
`of her team leader, Jeff Rawlings, another protégé of Dr. Leif.
`
`It was Leif who first alerted him to Niku’s peculiarly dogged
`interest in some little-studied subtleties of HF oscillators. Until
`recently, Jeff had been too preoccupied to ask about this work.
`But when the opportunity arose, she enthusiastically shared her
`notes of the step-by-step questioning she’d applied to the start-
`up behavior of the basic two-transistor differential topology she
`was exploring. He was immediately impressed by her diligence in
`this self-appointed enterprise, and encouraged her to present a
`summary of her work at “Daedalus Days,” the series of meetings
`that Dr. Leif had instituted, years ago, and had named after the
`mythical Greek inventor. After that chat, Jeff was even more certain
`that her penetrating curiosity and insatiable appetite for pursuing
`basic insights would be valuable assets for their new project. Asking
`questions is the beginning of wisdom.
`
`The majority of the other team members were Fusers. While they
`were experienced and efficient, and the older ones were broadly
`informed about the IC business, their satisfaction came largely
`from providing a quick solution to a field application, using the
`large library of precharacterized, time-proven cells. Most of the
`Fusers had scant interest in topological exploration, save for one
`of them: Mauricio Pegna, hired several months before Niku. Rico
`showed great promise as an eager treasure seeker in the vast and
`rich forests of analog cell invention, and was clearly destined for
`an early promotion. A remote relative, Guido Pegna, once taught
`physics at the University of Caligari in Sardinia. Prof. Pegna,
`an exceptional teacher, offered a boldly different perspective on
`science—one that was, he said, “less worrying, less dramatic,
`more fun, more human, more delightful.” Among his legacies was
`a fascinating site on the old Internet: www.pegna.com.
`
`While picking away at her nutritional but totally uninspiring
`dinner, Niku watched the latest reports of the disappearing polar
`ice. The erosion of habitat for polar bears in the Arctic, and the
`confusing loss of landmarks for penguins and other migratory birds
`in Antarctica, who for eons had regarded these stable regions as
`their home and birthright, was troubling enough. But disruptions
`of that sort were eclipsed by the sheer magnitude of the threat to
`human life and property posed by the ever-rising sea level.
`
`As a kid, during the overture to the 21st century, Niku had heard
`plenty of talking heads indulging in endless exchanges of blame:
`across national borders, between political parties, and between
`various agencies charged with caring for the environment. But little
`was done to reverse these trends. For all the bickering, pollutants
`and greenhouse gases were still on the rise as late as 2016. Now,
`in the mid ’20s, at least they were stable, but at levels far too high
`for complacency. Only when low-lying coastal regions began to be
`inundated did world governments finally grasp the ominous reality
`of the science. After years of glory, the older areas of Venice were
`the first to succumb, and were soon abandoned.
`
`These shocking events were followed by the asteroid strike in
`August of 2017. Fortunately for humanity, after a terrifyingly
`blazing journey on an uncertain and wobbly trajectory, it had
`burned itself down to the size of a one-seat commutobile when it
`hit a remote region of Antarctica at a fairly steep angle. The heat
`equivalent of its massive kinetic energy had greatly accelerated
`the melting of the ice and the rising sea levels. That event led to
`the formation of the Coalition of Terrestrial Governments, and
`galvanized its member-nations into drafting laws which earlier
`would have been regarded as quite untenable. Several smaller
`nations declared martial law, strictly rationed supplies, and then
`applied repressive penalties for any kind of wastage. There were
`sporadic demonstrations, but they soon fizzled out.
`Now, only eight years later, the outrage and tensions had eased,
`in a seemingly miraculous—certainly astonishing—reversal of
`history. The disparate and entrenched ideological stances of the
`leading nations were dissolving into acts of genuine cooperation.
`The first fragile signs of a shift in attitude toward the arbitrariness
`and irrationality of nationalism were becoming evident. Another
`big shake-up: In 2018, NASA, ESA, and other space agencies
`were obliged to accept a new charter: to put space exploration on
`hold, until Earth, this most important and precious of planets,
`was clearly on its way to recovering from the ravages and excesses
`of more than a century of unmitigated abuse.
`Understandably, most scientists and engineers in these agencies,
`and many academicians, were violently opposed to this directive;
`but the dire urgency of the prevailing circumstances soon forced
`them to come around. These reorganized agencies, and new ones
`such as the IOA, had, for about seven years now, applied their best
`minds to Project Milton—“Restoring Our Common Habitat and
`Heritage.” The notion of freedom had taken on a new, more vital
`and self-disciplined meaning, and not a decade too soon.
`Removing the visionizer headband, and putting aside her food
`tray, Niku settled down for the evening. Saying RAISE! to the
`SyntheDown pillow unit, it fine-tuned the personalized presets
`interactively to conform even more comfortably to her contours.
`She reached for the thin blue Actablet, which kept the details of
`her studies. Propping it up on her raised knees, it came alive at her
`touch. She struggled to refocus her mind for the evening’s work:
`to be well prepared for next week’s Daedalus Day presentation,
`she needed to get these notes, and the many results, into some
`semblance of order.
`But almost immediately, Marcoloonie, her lithe and intelligent
`Abyssinian kitten, was vying for attention. Plunking himself
`on her chest, with no room for negotiation, he offered his wide
`eyes in place of the screen—an old trick of cats. Succumbing
`to the hypnosis, she planted her hands on his warm fur. Nose
`to nose, they shared air, and her racing mind dropped down to
`first gear. Half-waking sometime later, she found Marco asleep,
`curled in a contented ball at her feet. She sighed LOWER! to
`the pillow unit.
`* * *
`At mid-morning, Dr. Leif encountered her in the hall. “Hi, Niku!
`How are you? Y’know, I’ve been meaning for some time to ask
`you about the rest of your oscillator story. Do you have time for a
`good cup of coffee over at GalaxyBux?”
`“Sure, Dr. Leif. I’ve been trying to put my notes into a logical
`order for the Daedelus talk next week, but so far I haven’t made
`much progress. A chat with you would help a lot. Let me just pop
`back to the lab for my Actablet.”
`As they arrived at the coffee shop, the Greeter did its usual thing,
`except that now it also recognized Niku: “Good morning, Dr. Leif,
`Dr. Yeng. I trust your day is going well. We have a great special
`
`Analog Dialogue Volume 40 Number 2
`
`3
`
`Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
`Ex. 1062, p. 3
`
`

`

`this morning. It’s …” They didn’t wait to hear about the day’s
`special, nor the ad that was sure to follow. Finding a table for four,
`Niku sat beside her mentor, to more easily share the screen of her
`’tablet. With coffee ordered, a touch brought up the usual gallery
`of icons. She selected one labeled Oscar.
`“Oscar?” quizzed the amused senior. “Why Oscar?”
`“Oh, I’ve become quite fond of this little circuit, so I gave him a
`name. Actually, the title I’ll use for the talk is “Oscar Awakes,”
`to emphasize that it’s about the brief start-up phase, and how it’s
`dominated by circuit noise in a well-designed and well-balanced
`circuit. But I’m afraid I got sidetracked into other issues.”
`“Ah ha. I see. So, where did we leave off?”
`“Well, if you remember, I was taking each step cautiously, and the
`last time we talked I’d gotten as far as showing that when a fast step
`of current, I, is applied to a parallel LC tank, the circuit behaves as
`a pure resistance of √(L/C), resulting in a voltage, V = I√(L/C),
`which persists as the nondecaying amplitude of a sinusoid,
`while the magnetic and dielectric energies oscillate between LI 2
`and CV 2. Of course, that never happens in a real circuit, mostly
`because of the finite series resistance of the inductor. But even if
`the elements were ‘perfect,’ some of the stored energy must be lost
`by radiation—mostly from the inductor, whose magnetic field, in
`the case of an open coil, generates an EM wave.”
`“Did you try calculating the radiation loss from first principles?”
`“Hmm … I haven’t given it any thought and I’m not sure I could.
`I’m trying to stay focused on the issue of the noise-excited start-
`up trajectory. I mean … there are so many other basic questions
`you could investigate. For example, intuition tells me that there’s
`a dual—the series-connected LC tank, driven by an ideal voltage
`source. A fast step of V would then set up a circulating current of
`V/ √(L/C). Thinking about the Fundaments—if I may adopt your
`valuable idea—it couldn’t be anything else, since L and C must
`determine the impedance, and, from a dimensional perspective,
`these have to be combined as √(L/C). I don’t think one needs to
`demonstrate that by separate simulations.”
`The coffee arrived. “Your intuitions serve you well, Niku. These
`kinds of nonmathematical analysis provide just one example of what
`I call the What Must Be philosophy. Understanding of crucial
`aspects of circuit design or behavior can often be gained simply
`by listing the known variables, then asking how the dimensional
`constraints can be satisfied. In the case of little Oscar’s parallel-
`tuned tank, you knew there has to be a voltage, V, caused by the
`applied current, I, which demands a relationship via impedance,
`because V = IZ. So there’s one What Must Be factor, right away.
`“Then, when GE8E later showed you that the amplitude of the
`resulting sinusoid didn’t change over time, it confirmed your
`intuition that ‘Z’ has to be a simple resistance. You realized that
`there’s only one way of getting something with the dimension
`of resistance out of an L and a C, and that’s from their ratio
`L/C—although this is actually R2. After all, there is only one
`other simple dimensionally correct way of combining L and
`C—as the product, LC. This probably led you to think of two
`standard forms: √(L/C), which has the dimension of resistance;
`and √(LC), which has the dimension of time—or 1/√(LC), which
`has the dimension of angular frequency. One can easily arrive at
`these basic forms from first principles, considering the inherent
`dimensions of inductance and capacitance. This concern for what
`has to be included and what can be excluded without significant loss is
`philosophically related to the Principle of Occam’s Razor.”
`“Mmm ...?” said Niku, sipping the dark brew. “Who is Occam,
`and what do his shaving habits have to do with a principle?”
`“William of Ockham was a 14th-century … No, that can wait.
`
`Roughly speaking, he conjectured that when faced with two or
`more ways to explain some phenomenon, the most simple is usually
`the right one: the razor will pare away the rest. In the same spirit,
`faced with several ways to configure a basic circuit, in meeting
`some performance challenge, it often pays to use the simplest
`possible form. Of course, you can’t create new circuit forms, from
`scratch, in this way, only choose from pre-existing possibilities.
`The origination of topology is a daunting aspect of analog design,
`and the chief reason why many find it Difficult.
`
`“Still, Occam’s Razor can nicely complement the philosophy of
`intuitive design, the most important aspect of which is the habit of
`ceaselessly asking What If? How About? Why Is That? What Must
`Be?—that kind of question—before plunging into a detailed and
`time-consuming analysis that may turn out to be irrelevant or fail
`to contribute any useful insights.
`
`“A simulator is an indispensable partner in telling you what will
`happen— with high numerical accuracy—if that is all you need
`to know. But after seeing what happens, your eyes are invariably
`opened to insights; and these lead to even more deeply probing
`questions, as you’re demonstrating. Sometime, I’d like to share
`some personal case histories of What Must Be reasoning. Many of
`them rely on elegance-driven heuristics like Occam’s Razor. But
`I’m anxious to hear about Oscar. What did you do next?”
`
`“Well, this actually wasn’t the next thing I looked at, during my
`early studies; but I was curious and went back later to explore it. In
`fact, Dr. Leif, that’s my dilemma. I don’t know whether to include
`such details in my talk or not, because they are merely tangential
`to the original topic. But I will tell you about this one.
`“I was curious about the effect of the rise time, tR, of the current
`step. Only a pulse having a rise time of zero would generate the full
`I √(L/C), so I wanted to discover the relationship between the rise
`time and the resulting amplitude of the tank voltage. What rise
`time would cause it to be reduced by, say, 10%? What if it’s equal
`to a significant fraction of the period, up to or even beyond the
`full period? One thing was certain: for very slow rise times—when
`tR is hundreds of times √(LC)—practically all of the current must
`flow in the inductor, generating a small voltage LdI/dt.”
`
`“Niku,” interrupted Dr. Leif, touching her lightly on the wrist.
`“Y’know, these questions aren’t all that far off the beaten track.
`After all, in a practical oscillator, the currents coming from the
`driving circuit will have finite rise times, and you might have
`uncovered an ‘incidental’ fact that would alter the direction of
`your studies—perhaps radically. The trick is knowing when to
`stop chasing every side thought. You can never suppress them.
`Even if one’s thinking is clear and controlled, the mind will be
`nonetheless seething with questions continuously generated by
`our innate propensity for confabulation. Look, you have hardly
`touched your coffee. Please, take a moment to enjoy it.”
`
`But Niku rattled on as the coffee contributed to cosmic entropy.
`“Yes, I really do find it difficult to cope with all the questions
`and ideas for new experiments that keep coming to mind! The
`question about the importance of the rise time led me to worry
`about the effect of the detailed wave-shape of the current step,
`since this obviously determines the frequency-domain spectrum
`of the voltage. How would my ideal, infinite-Q tank be affected
`by this? GE8E provides a rich assortment of forms, including
`the simple ramp [the PULSE source in SPICE—Ed.] and the
`raised-cosine form, both of which occupy a finite time; and it
`provides the Gaussian form, which must be truncated before
`t = 0, for any finite delay—though, it’s only 0.148 ppm of the
`final value at a time four times earlier than that needed to get
`10% up the edge.
`
`4
`
`Analog Dialogue Volume 40 Number 2
`
`Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
`Ex. 1062, p. 4
`
`

`

`On the other hand, the measured peak voltage of 14.235… V is
`exactly twice my erroneously predicted value, which happens to
`be exactly (1/p) × 44.72… V—isn’t that intriguing! So until I
`have all my facts together, I won’t touch on this in my talk.”
`
`“Well, yes; but it would be more intriguing if the factor weren’t
`(1/p) but, say, exactly (1/7), because then you’d need a theory to
`explain where this new number comes from! Anyway, now that
`GE8E has shown you the error of your ways, I agree it wouldn’t
`be wise to introduce this matter, unless you know what’s going
`on,” said Leif, his eyes twinkling. “I understand why you’d feel
`uncomfortable about not being able to get to the bottom of all
`these details. Still, at this point, I’m going to let you—how does
`it go?—stew in your own juices for a while!
`
`“However, I will mention that this is one of those times when
`you will need to dust off your Laplace transforms, and use
`paper and pencil to find out Why Is That? Though simulators
`are excellent tools, and fine for showing what happens, they
`haven’t a clue as to why. They aren’t aware, as we are, of the
`Fundaments, and in spite of decades of promises from the AI
`folks, GE8E still can’t emulate creativity in any useful way.
`That’s why we hire people like you, Niku, and why we use the
`job description Originator. But I have a question for you to mull
`over: Do you recognize the functional shape of your plot of PSS
`amplitude vs. rise time?”
`
`“Well, it looks like the absolute-sine-x-over-x form,” Niku said,
`“but I don’t know why. I suppose if I could trust Occam’s Razor,
`that simple answer would probably be the right one.”
`
`“Mmm. It’s not really a job for Occam, since you have only
`one suggestion! But it’s a smart guess. Still, why would it
`have that form, and what causes all those nulls? Every effect
`has a cause.”
`
`His wink was the only encouragement she needed to strengthen
`her resolve to understand this by Daedalus Day. “Maybe I
`will include these analyses, after all,” she beamed, confident
`of her practiced ability to wield the Laplacian sword. As they
`left, her coffee continued its spiraling descent to ambient.
`Walking back to the lab, under a yellowish sky, Niku said,
`“By the way, you still haven’t told me what the Fourth Dee
`of analog design is.”
`
`“Ah, but I did,” said Dr. Leif, “only a few moments ago.”
`
`Barrie Gilbert, the first-appointed ADI
`Fellow, has “spent a lifetime in pursuit
`of analog excellence.” Barrie was born
`in Bournemouth, England, in 1937.
`Before joining ADI, he worked with
`first-generation transistors at SRDE in
`1954. At Mullard, Ltd. in the late ’50s,
`he pioneered transistorized sampling
`oscilloscopes, and in 1964 became a
`leading ’scope designer at Tektronix. He
`spent two years as a group leader at Plessey Research Labs before
`joining Analog Devices in 1972, where he is now director of the
`Northwest Labs in Beaverton, Oregon. Barrie is a Life Fellow
`of the IEEE and has received numerous service awards. He has
`about 70 issued patents, has authored some 50 papers, is a reviewer
`for several professional journals, and is a co-author or co-editor
`of five books. In 1997, he was awarded an honorary doctorate of
`engineering from Oregon State University.
`
`“Anyway, I thought it might be useful to explore these effects for
`an isolated tank, using a 20-nH inductor shunted by a 10-pF cap,
`which resonates at 355.88… MHz, this time using a single unit
`step of 1 A. As expected, the tank voltage for an extremely slow
`ramp is dI(t)/dt times the inductance. But I didn’t expect this …”
`Turning the screen of her Actablet to a better angle for Leif, she
`showed him the first of two sets of plots.
`44.72V
`
`I(t)
`
`C
`10pF
`
`L
`20nH
`
`PEAK AMPLITUDE OF THE OSCILLATION
`DURING THE RISING INVERVAL
`
`SUSTAINED AMPLITUDE OF THE
`OSCILLATION DURING THE RISING INVERVAL
`
`~9.7V
`
`40V
`
`30V
`
`20V
`
`10V
`
`AMPLITUDE OF OSCILLATION
`
`5
`
`0
`
`0
`
`4
`3
`2
`1
`RISE TIME, NORMALIZED TO ONE PERIOD OF THE TANK
`Figure 1.
`“Let’s see,” he pondered. “The horizontal axis (Figure 1) shows
`the number of periods of the tank over which the current linearly
`rises to 1 A; and vertically, you’re showing the peak amplitude of
`the oscillation both during and after the rising edge, right?” Niku
`nodded. “And I see that for fast-rising pulses, the stable periodic-
`steady-state amplitude of the sine wave is 44.72… V, which is
`consistent with your √(L/C) value of 44.72… V. Then, as the rise
`time increases, the PSS amplitude steadily falls, becoming zero
`when it’s exactly equal to one whole period of the tank. For slower
`rise times, it rises back up, to roughly 9.7 V, falling back to zero
`whenever the rise time is an integer number of periods. And your
`second set (Figure 2) shows the actual time-domain voltages for
`several rise times up to one full period. Okay. Now, what did you
`expect would happen?” Leif asked mischievously.
`
`1A
`
`I(t)
`
`0
`
`40V
`20V
`0
`–20V
`–40V
`15V
`
`10V
`
`5V
`
`0
`
`+44.72V
`
`+14.235V
`
`+14.235V
`
`RISE TIME = ONE PERIOD
`
`–44.72V
`
`EXPANDED PLOT
`OF THE CASE
`WHERE tr IS
`EXACTLY ONE
`PERIOD
`
`3.6
`
`4.0
`
`4.4
`
`4.8
`
`0
`
`0.4
`
`0.8
`
`1.2
`
`1.6
`
`2.0
`2.4
`2.8
`3.2
`REAL TIME (ns)
`Figure 2.
`“Well, until I saw this, I expected the amplitude to simply keep
`on falling as tR increased. I assumed that, for a rise time as long
`as one tank period, it would be already slow enough to approach
`the point where the voltage would be just LdI/dt, and that a 1-A
`step with a rise rate of 355.88127 A/ms, when multiplied by the
`inductance of 20 nH, would make a rectangular voltage pulse of
`7.117625 V. But the actual waveform seems to be a raised sine.
`Then I realized that if a step of voltage did appear, immediately,
`at the foot of the current ramp, there’d be a very large capacitor
`current, so my ‘simple’ expectation was just a bit too simplistic!
`
`Analog Dialogue Volume 40 Number 2
`
`
`
`Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
`Ex. 1062, p. 5
`
`

`

`Class D Audio Amplifiers:
`What, Why, and How
`
`By Eric Gaalaas [eric.gaalaas@analog.com]
`
`Class D amplifiers, first proposed in 1958, have become
`increasingly popular in recent years. What are Class D amplifiers?
`How do they compare with other kinds of amplifiers? Why is
`Class D of interest for audio? What is needed to make a “good”
`audio Class D amplifier? What are the features of ADI’s Class D
`amplifier products? Find the answers to all these questions in the
`following pages.
`
`Audio Amplifier Background
`The goal of audio amplifiers is to reproduce input audio signals
`at sound-producing output elements, with desired volume and
`power levels—faithfully, efficiently, and at low distortion. Audio
`frequencies range from about 20 Hz to 20 kHz, so the amplifier
`must have good frequency response over this range (less when
`driving a band-limited speaker, such as a woofer or a tweeter).
`Power capabilities vary widely depending on the application,
`from milliwatts in headphones, to a few watts in TV or PC audio,
`to tens of watts for “mini” home stereos and automotive audio,
`to hundreds of watts and beyond for more powerful home and
`commercial sound systems—and to fill theaters or auditoriums
`with sound.
`A straightforward analog implementation of an audio amplifier
`uses transistors in linear mode to create an output voltage that
`is a scaled copy of the input voltage. The forward voltage gain
`is usually high (at least 40 dB). If the forward gain is part of a
`feedback loop, the overall loop gain will also be high. Feedback
`is often used because high loop gain improves performance—
`suppressing distortion caused by nonlinearities in the forward path
`and reducing power-supply noise by increa

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket