throbber
https //www busmessw1re com/news/home/20211110005706/en/Bnght-Data-Statement-On-Successful-Outcome-Of-Patent-lnfnngement-Tnal
`
`August 22. 2022
`
`HOME SERVICES NEWS EDUCATION ABOUT US
`
`Search
`
`0. .
`
`Log In Sign Up
`
`BRIGHT DATA
`
`Release Summary
`Bright Data Statement On Trial Outcome
`
`> More News ~
`
`Contacts
`Kere n Pa kes
`
`kerenp@brightdata.com
`
`Bright Data Statement On Successful Outcome Of Patent Infringement
`Trial
`
`November 10, 2021 06:19 AM Eas~ern Standard Time
`
`LONDON--(BUSINESS W IRE)--Bright Data is pleased to announce that a federal jury in the US state of Texas returned a verdict
`that found that Oxylabs willfully used Bright Data's patented technology for developing and implementing their residential proxy
`solution.
`
`"This is a welcome and deserved
`outcome for us and the whole
`community"
`W Tweet this
`
`The jury came to the following conclusions:
`
`• All of the asserted Bright Data patent claims were found valid.
`
`• Oxylabs infringed Bright Data's patent rights.
`
`• Oxylabs' infringement was willful.
`
`• Oxylabs should compensate Bright Data for its lost profits.
`
`Bright Data is happy with the outcome of the trial and is looking forward to continuing to focus its full a ttention on creating
`technologies that preserve a transparent internet, where anyone can easily access publicly available web data. Bright Data urges
`companies not to use products that were found to infringe on its patents.
`
`''This is a welcome and deserved outcome for us and the whole community," explained Or Lenchner, CEO, Bright Data. "To trust
`the web data you receive, you first need to trust the data collection partners you rely on. As the market leader in this unique
`space, our teams work tirelessly to innovate new technology to deliver positive outcomes for thousands of commercial, public
`sector, and charitable organizations around the world. Due to the rapid increase in online data, we work in a highly competitive
`and fast-growth industry, but at no point should the standards and ethics of brands in this space drop below those expected."
`
`Events' summary:
`
`On Friday, November 5, 2021 , a federal jury in the US state of Texas returned a ve rdict that found : Teso LT, UAB, Oxysales,
`UAB, and Metacluster LT, UAB, which collectively use the name "Oxylabs," willfully infringed Bright Data's patent rights.
`
`On December 6, 2019, Bright Data filed a patent infringement lawsuit against Oxylabs in Bright Data Ltd. v. Teso LT , UAB et. al.,
`Case No. 2:19-cv-395, asserting infringement on Bright Data's US Patents 10,257,319; 10,484,510; and 10,469,614.
`
`Almost two years later, a federal jury reached a conclusion that reaffirmed that Oxylabs willfully infringed Bright Data's patent
`rights. As a result, the jury found that Bright Data should be fully compensated for all lost profits.
`
`Contacts
`Keren Pakes
`kerenp@brightdata.com
`
`a rn
`
`MorefromBusiness W1re: Blog UK/Ireland Deutschland Fra nce Hong Kong
`
`Italy Japan Tradeshownewscom
`
`Contact Us UK Tax Strategy Pnvacy Statement Manage Cookies Terms of Use © 2022 Business Wire
`
`Major Data Ex. 1026
`Major Data UAB v. Bright Data Ltd.
`IPR2022-00915
`Page 1 of 1
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket