`FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`MARSHALL DIVISION
`
`CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:19-CV-00395-JRG
`
`§ §
`
`§
`§
`
`§§
`
`:
`
`§ §
`
`§
`
`BRIGHT DATA LTD.,
`
`a
`Plaintiff,
`
`y
`TESO LT, UAB, METACLUSTER LT,
`UAB, OXYSALES, UAB,
`
`Defendants.
`
`JURY VERDICT FORM
`
`In answering the following questions and completing this Verdict Form, you
`
`are to follow all the instructions I have given you in the Court’s Final Jury
`
`Instructions. Your answers to each question must be unanimous. Some of the
`
`questions contain legal terms that are defined and explained in detail in the Final
`
`Jury Instructions. You should refer to and considerthe Final Jury Instructions as you
`
`answerthe questions in this Verdict Form.
`
`Major Data, UABv. Bright Data Ltd.
`Major Data, UAB v. Bright Data Ltd.
`IPR2022-00915, EX. 2015
`IPR2022-00915, EX. 2015
`1 of 8
`1 of 8
`
`
`
`Asused herein, the following terms have the following meanings:
`
`e
`
`“Bright Data” refers to Plaintiff Bright Data, Ltd. (formerly known as
`
`Luminati Networks Ltd.)
`
`e
`
`“QOxylabs”refers collectively to Defendants Teso LT, UAB, Oxysales,
`
`UAB,and Metacluster LT, UAB.
`
`e The “’319 Patent” refers to U.S. Patent No. 10,257,319.
`
`e The “’510 Patent” refers to U.S. Patent No. 10,484,510.
`
`e The “’614 Patent” refers to U.S. Patent No. 10,469,614.
`
`e
`
`“Asserted Patents” refers collectively to the °319 Patent,
`
`the *510
`
`Patent, and the ’614 Patent.
`
`e The “Asserted Claims”refers collectively to:
`
`o Claims | and 26 of the ’319 Patent;
`
`o Claims 1 and 22 of the 510 Patent; and
`
`o Claims 1, 11, 16, and 20 of the ’614 Patent.
`
`Major Data, UABv. Bright Data Ltd.
`Major Data, UAB v. Bright Data Ltd.
`IPR2022-00915, EX. 2015
`IPR2022-00915, EX. 2015
`2 of 8
`2 of 8
`
`
`
`IT IS VERY IMPORTANT THAT YOU FOLLOW THE
`
`INSTRUCTIONS PROVIDED IN THIS VERDICT FORM.
`
`READ THEM CAREFULLY AND
`
`ENSURE YOUR VERDICT COMPLIES WITH THEM.
`
`Major Data, UABv. Bright Data Ltd.
`Major Data, UAB v. Bright Data Ltd.
`IPR2022-00915, EX. 2015
`IPR2022-00915, EX. 2015
`3 of 8
`3 of 8
`
`
`
`QUESTION NO. 1
`
`Did Bright Data prove by a preponderance of the evidence that Oxylabs infringed
`
`ANYof the Asserted Claims?
`
`Yes! 4
`
`No:
`
`Major Data, UABv. Bright Data Ltd.
`Major Data, UAB v. Bright Data Ltd.
`IPR2022-00915, EX. 2015
`IPR2022-00915, EX. 2015
`4 of 8
`4 of 8
`
`
`
`QUESTION NO.2
`
`Did Oxylabs prove by clear and convincing evidence that any of the following
`
`Asserted Claims are invalid?
`
`Claim 1| of the ‘319 Patent
`
`Yes:
`
`Claim 26 of the ’319 Patent
`
`Yes:
`
`Claim 1| of the ’510 Patent
`
`Yes:
`
`Claim 22 of the ’510 Patent
`
`Yes:
`
`Claim 1| of the ’614 Patent
`
`Yes:
`
`Claim 11 of the ’614 Patent
`
`Yes:
`
`Claim 16 of the ’614 Patent
`
`Yes:
`
`Claim 20 of the ’614 Patent
`
`Major Data, UABv. Bright Data Ltd.
`Major Data, UAB v. Bright Data Ltd.
`IPR2022-00915, EX. 2015
`IPR2022-00915, EX. 2015
`5 of 8
`5 of 8
`
`
`
`If you answered “No” to Question No. 1, OR “YES” to ALL Asserted Claimsin
`Question No. 2, then DO NOT answer Question No. 3.
`
`Answer Question No. 3 ONLY as to any Asserted Claim that you have found
`BOTHto be infringed AND notinvalid.
`
`QUESTION NO.3
`
`Did Bright Data prove by a preponderance of the evidence that Oxylabs willfully
`
`infringed ANY of the Asserted Claims that you found were infringed?
`
`Yes: J
`
`No:
`
`Major Data, UABv. Bright Data Ltd.
`Major Data, UAB v. Bright Data Ltd.
`IPR2022-00915, EX. 2015
`IPR2022-00915, EX. 2015
`6 of 8
`6 of 8
`
`
`
`If you answered “No”to Question No. 1, OR “YES” to ALL Asserted Claims in
`Question No. 2, then DO NOT answer Question No. 4.
`
`Answer Question No. 4 ONLYas to any Asserted Claim that you have found
`BOTHto be infringed AND notinvalid.
`
`QUESTION NO.4
`
`What sum of money, if any, has Bright Data proven by a preponderance of the
`
`evidencethat it is entitled to receive from Oxylabsaslost profits?
`
`Answerin United States Dollars and Cents, if any:
`
`s TYP 976. =
`
`Major Data, UABv. Bright Data Ltd.
`Major Data, UAB v. Bright Data Ltd.
`IPR2022-00915, EX. 2015
`IPR2022-00915, EX. 2015
`7 0f 8
`7 of 8
`
`
`
`FINAL PAGE OF JURY VERDICT FORM
`
`You have now reachedthe end of the Verdict Form and should review it to
`
`ensureit accurately reflects your unanimous determinations. The Jury Foreperson
`
`should then sign and date the Verdict From in the space below. Oncethis is done,
`
`notify the Court Security Officer that you have reached a verdict. The Jury
`
`Foreperson should keep the Verdict Form andbring it when the jury is brought back
`
`into the courtroom.
`
`Signedthis 67 day ofNovember, 2021.
`
`Jury Foreperson
`
`Major Data, UABv. Bright Data Ltd.
`IPR2022-00915, EX. 2015
`8 of 8
`
`