`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`MARSHALL DIVISION
`
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`
`ORDER
`Before the Court is the Supplemental Claim Construction Order (the “Supplemental
`
`
`
`
`
`
`CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:19-CV-00395-JRG
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`BRIGHT DATA LTD.,
`
`
`
`v.
`
`TESO LT, UAB, METACLUSTER LT,
`UAB, OXYSALES, UAB,
`
`
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`Defendants.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Order”) of Magistrate Judge Payne dated August 6, 2021. (Dkt. No. 453). Plaintiff Bright Data
`
`Ltd. (“Bright Data”) has filed Corrected Objections to Magistrate Judge Payne’s Claim
`
`Construction Order (the “Objections”). (Dkt. No. 461).
`
`After considering the reasoning provided in the Supplemental Order, the underlying claim
`
`construction briefing, Bright Data’s Objections, and Defendants Teso LT, UAB, Oxysales, UAB,
`
`and Metacluster LT, UAB’s Response to Bright Data’s Corrected Objections to Magistrate Judge
`
`Payne’s Claim Construction Order (Dkt. No. 472), the Court agrees with the conclusions reached
`
`within the Supplemental Order and finds Bright Data’s arguments unpersuasive. Accordingly, the
`
`Court OVERRULES Bright Data’s Objections.
`
`
`
`
`
`.
`
`____________________________________
`RODNEY GILSTRAP
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
`
`So ORDERED and SIGNED this 21st day of September, 2021.
`
`Major Data Ex. 1113
`Major Data UAB v. Bright Data Ltd.
`IPR2022-00915
`Page 1 of 1
`
`