throbber
Trials@uspto.gov
`571-272-7822
`
`
` Paper 9
`
`Date Entered: October 18, 2022
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS, LTD.,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`AIRE TECHNOLOGY LIMITED
`Patent Owner.
`____________
`
`IPR2022-00874 (Patent 8,174,360 B2)
`IPR2022-00875 (Patent 8,205,249 B2)
`IPR2022-00876 (Patent 8,581,706 B2)
`IPR2022-00877 (Patent 8,816,827 B2)1
`____________
`
`
`Before JEFFREY S. SMITH, BRIAN J. McNAMARA, and
`MIRIAM L. QUINN, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`
`McNAMARA, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`
`DECISION
`Settlement Prior to Institution of Trial
`37 C.F.R. §§ 42.5(a), 42.71(a), 42.74
`
`
`1 This Order addresses the same issue for the above-identified proceedings.
`Therefore, we exercise our discretion to issue one order to be filed in each
`proceeding. The parties, however, are not authorized to use this style
`heading in any subsequent papers.
`
`

`

`IPR2022-00874 (Patent 8,174,360 B2)
`IPR2022-00875 (Patent 8,205,249 B2)
`IPR2022-00876 (Patent 8,581,706 B2)
`IPR2022-00877 (Patent 8,816,827 B2)
`
`
`INTRODUCTION
`I.
`With the Board’s authorization, Petitioner and Patent Owner
`(collectively “the Parties”) filed a Joint Motion to Dismiss in each of the
`above-identified proceedings due to settlement. Paper 62 (“Joint Motion”).
`Along with the Joint Motion, the Parties filed, in each of the above identified
`proceedings, a copy of their Patent License Agreement (Ex. 1102) and their
`Escrow Agreement (Ex. 2001)3 (collectively “Settlement Agreement”), as
`well as a Joint Request to Keep Separate (“Joint Request”) that requests the
`Board to treat the Settlement Agreement as business confidential
`information and to keep it separate from the publicly available files in the
`above-identified proceedings. Paper 7.
`II. DISCUSSION
`In the Joint Motion, the Parties represent that they have reached an
`agreement to jointly seek termination of the above-identified proceedings,
`that a copy of the Settlement Agreement has been filed as an exhibit, and
`that there are no other collateral agreements or understandings. Joint Motion
`2. Further, the Settlement Agreement indicates it is a complete agreement.
`Ex. 1011, 13. Samsung and Patent Owner also represent that their Settlement
`Agreement resolves all their disputes relating to the above identified patents.
`Joint Motion 1–3.
`
`
`2 For purposes of expediency, we cite to Papers filed in IPR2022-00874.
`Similar papers were filed in the other above-identified proceedings.
`3 For purposes of expediency, we cite to Exhibits filed in IPR2022-00874.
`The Parties filed the Settlement Agreement in the other above-identified
`proceedings as well
`
`
`
`2
`
`

`

`IPR2022-00874 (Patent 8,174,360 B2)
`IPR2022-00875 (Patent 8,205,249 B2)
`IPR2022-00876 (Patent 8,581,706 B2)
`IPR2022-00877 (Patent 8,816,827 B2)
`
`
`The above-identified proceedings are at an early stage, and we have
`not yet decided whether to institute a trial in any of the above-identified
`proceedings. In view of the early stage of the above-identified proceedings,
`and the settlement between the Parties, we determine that good cause exists
`to dismiss the petitions and terminate the above-identified proceedings with
`respect to the Parties. In the Joint Request, the Parties requested that the
`Settlement Agreement be treated as business confidential information and be
`kept separate from the files of the above-identified patents. Joint Request 1.
`After reviewing the Settlement Agreement, we find that the Settlement
`Agreement contains confidential business information regarding the terms of
`settlement. We determine that good cause exists to treat the Settlement
`Agreement as business confidential information pursuant to 35 U.S.C. §
`317(b) and 37 C.F.R. § 42.74(c). This Order does not constitute a final
`written decision pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 318(a).
`III. ORDER
`Accordingly, for the reasons discussed above, it is: ORDERED that
`the Joint Motion in each of the above-identified proceedings is granted;
`FURTHER ORDERED that the Petition in each proceeding is
`dismissed, and each of the above-identified proceedings is terminated; and
` FURTHER ORDERED that the Joint Request to Keep Separate in
`each of the above-identified proceedings is granted, and the Settlement
`Agreement shall be kept separate from the files of the above-identified
`patents, and made available only to Federal Government agencies on written
`request, or to any person on a showing of good cause, pursuant to 35 U.S.C.
`§ 317(b) and 37 C.F.R. § 42.74(c).
`
`
`
`3
`
`

`

`IPR2022-00874 (Patent 8,174,360 B2)
`IPR2022-00875 (Patent 8,205,249 B2)
`IPR2022-00876 (Patent 8,581,706 B2)
`IPR2022-00877 (Patent 8,816,827 B2)
`
`
`
`PETITIONER
`W. Karl Renner
`Jeremy J. Monaldo
`Jennifer Huang
`Kiersten Batzli
`FISH & RICHARDSON P.C.
`axf-ptab@fr.com
`jjm@fr.com
`jjh@fr.com
`batzli@fr.com
`
`
`
`PATENT OWNER
`
`Brett Cooper
`Reza Mirzaie
`RUSS, AUGUST & KABAT
`bcooper@raklaw.com
`rmirzaie@raklaw.com
`
`
`
`
`4
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket