Case 2:19-cv-00395-JRG Document 450 Filed 07/16/21 Page 1of 7 PagelD #: 24336
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`
`FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`
`MARSHALL DIVISION
`
`Bright Data Ltd.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`Teso LT, UAB, Oxysales, UAB, and
`Metacluster LT, UAB,
`
`Defendants.
`
`
`
`Civil Action No.
`2:19-cv-00395-JRG
`
`DEFENDANTS’ DISCLOSURE PURSUANTTO 35 U.S.C. § 282
`
`Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 282, Defendants Teso LT, UAB, Oxysales, UAB, and Metacluster
`
`LT, UAB (collectively, “Oxylabs” or “Defendants”) provide notice to Plaintiff Bright Data Ltd.
`
`(“Bright Data’) of the following: (1) patents and publications relied upon for anticipation of the
`
`patents-in-suit or as showing the state of the art; and (11) persons who mayberelied upon as the
`
`prior inventor, as having prior knowledgeof, or as having previously used or offered for sale the
`
`invention of the patents-in-suit.
`
`PATENTS AND PUBLISHED PATENT APPLICATIONS
`
`Filing Date
`
`Country
`
`2000
`
`Issue Date or
`Publication Date
`
`Publa oN
`Calton
`
`NO.
`
`Patentee
`
`Shribmanetal.
`
`
`Tune15,2012_|15, 2012 fus|Mareh3,2015.|3, 2015 3,972,602|972,602|Mithyantha
`July14,2010 oO April14,2011
`2011/0087733
`
`Code200, UAB,etal. v. Bright Data Ltd.
`IPR2022-00861, EX. 2002
`10f7
`
`
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`
`FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`
`MARSHALL DIVISION
`
`Bright Data Ltd.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`Teso LT, UAB, Oxysales, UAB, and
`Metacluster LT, UAB,
`
`Defendants.
`
`
`
`Civil Action No.
`2:19-cv-00395-JRG
`
`DEFENDANTS’ DISCLOSURE PURSUANTTO 35 U.S.C. § 282
`
`Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 282, Defendants Teso LT, UAB, Oxysales, UAB, and Metacluster
`
`LT, UAB (collectively, “Oxylabs” or “Defendants”) provide notice to Plaintiff Bright Data Ltd.
`
`(“Bright Data’) of the following: (1) patents and publications relied upon for anticipation of the
`
`patents-in-suit or as showing the state of the art; and (11) persons who mayberelied upon as the
`
`prior inventor, as having prior knowledgeof, or as having previously used or offered for sale the
`
`invention of the patents-in-suit.
`
`PATENTS AND PUBLISHED PATENT APPLICATIONS
`
`Filing Date
`
`Country
`
`2000
`
`Issue Date or
`Publication Date
`
`Publa oN
`Calton
`
`NO.
`
`Patentee
`
`Shribmanetal.
`
`
`Tune15,2012_|15, 2012 fus|Mareh3,2015.|3, 2015 3,972,602|972,602|Mithyantha
`July14,2010 oO April14,2011
`2011/0087733
`
`Code200, UAB,etal. v. Bright Data Ltd.
`IPR2022-00861, EX. 2002
`10f7
`
`
`
`Case 2:19-cv-00395-JRG Document 450 Filed 07/16/21 Page 2 of 7 PagelD #: 24337
`
`August 29, 2006
`
`7,099,927
`
`Cudd etal.
`
`September 1, 2015
`
`9,122,554
`
`Callaghan etal.
`
`March 17, 2011
`
`2011/0066924
`
`Dorsoetal.
`
`June 5, 2008
`
`2008/0134258
`
`Gooseetal.
`
`US
`
`US
`
`US
`
`US
`
`August 30,
`2001
`
`February 8,
`2013
`
`September6,
`2009
`
`August 12,
`2005
`
`2013
`
`October 8, 2009 lus|April 9, 2019 10,257,319|Shribmanetal.et al.
`
`August28, =November5,2019
`
`
` June 1999
`
`
`
`10,469,614
`
`Shribmanetal.
`
`October 8, 2009
`
`November 19, 2019
`
`10,484,510
`
`Shribmanet al.
`
`PRINTED PUBLICATIONS
`
`November 1998
`
`Crowds: Anonymity for Web Transactions
`
`
`
`January 23, 2004 MorphMix - A Peer-to-Peer-based System|Passim
`for Anonymous Internet Access
`
`
`
`March 2004 Democratizing content publication with|Passim
`Coral. In Proc.
`Ist Symposium on Net-
`worked Systems Design and Implementa-
`tion (NSDI 04), San Francisco, CA.
`
`
`
`March 13, 2009 Experiences with Coral CDN: A five-year|Passim
`operational view. Microsoft Research.
`
`
`
`2001 Peer-to-Peer: Harnessing the Power of Dis-|Passim
`tuptive Technology, chapters Accountabil-
`ity and Free Haven. O’Reilly.
`
`Request 2616|Passimfor Comments (RFC)
`
`
`
`(HTTP), published by HTTP Working
`Group of the Internet Engineering Task
`Force (IETF)
`
`January 1980
`
`RFC 760 (Internet Protocol)
`
`Code200, UAB,et al. v. Bright Data Ltd.
`IPR2022-00861, EX. 2002
`2 of 7
`
`
`
`Case 2:19-cv-00395-JRG Document 450 Filed 07/16/21 Page 3 of 7 PageID #: 24338
`
`
`
`
`
`December 1998
`
`RFC 2460 (Internet Protocol Version 6
`(IPv6))
`
`Passim
`
`September 1981
`
`RFC 793 (Transmission Control Protocol
`(TCP))
`
`Passim
`
`July 1992
`
`RFC 1349 (Internet Protocol Suite)
`
`Passim
`
`September 2000
`
`RFC 2914 (Congestion Control Principles) Passim
`
`March 2005
`
`RFC 4026 (Provider Provisioned Virtual
`Private Network (VPN))
`
`Passim
`
`March 1999
`
`RFC 2547 (BGP/MPLS VPNs)
`
`January 1991
`
`RFC 1180 (TCP/IP Tutorial)
`
`October 1989
`
`RFC 1122 (Requirements for Internet Hosts
`– Communication Layers)
`
`October 2013
`
`W3 Geolocation API Specification
`
`December 2008
`
`W3 Geolocation API Specification
`
`Passim
`
`Passim
`
`Passim
`
`Passim
`
`Passim
`
`Passim
`
`Passim
`
`1998
`
`2006
`
`2011
`
`1987
`
`1987
`
`Web Proxy Servers, Ari Luotonen
`
`William R. Stanek, Introducing Microsoft
`Windows Vista 81 (2006)
`
`Yong Wang, et. al., Towards Street-Level
`Client-Independent IP Geolocation (2011)1
`
`Passim
`
`RFC 1034 (Domain Names – Concepts and
`Facilities)
`
`Passim
`
`RFC 1035 (Domain Names – Implementa-
`tion and Specification)
`
`Passim
`
`September 1981
`
`RFC 791 (Internet Protocol Version 4
`(IPv4))
`
`Passim
`
`October 1985
`
`RFC 959 (File Transfer Protocol (FTP))
`
`Passim
`
`August 1982
`
`RFC 821 (Simple Mail Transfer Protocol)
`
`Passim
`
`
`1 https://www.usenix.org/legacy/events/nsdi11/tech/full_papers/Wang_Yong.pdf
`3
`
`Code200, UAB, et al. v. Bright Data Ltd.
`IPR2022-00861, EX. 2002
`3 of 7
`
`
`
`Case 2:19-cv-00395-JRG Document 450 Filed 07/16/21 Page 4of 7 PagelD #: 24339
`
`
`
`October 1984 RFC 918 (Post Office Protocol version 1|Passim
`(POP1))
`
`
`
`February 1985 RFC 937 (Post Office Protocol version 2|Passim
`(POP2))
`
`
`
`May 1996 RFC 1939 (Post Office Protocol version 3|Passim
`(POP3))
`
`
`
`May 1996 RFC 1945 (Hypertext Transfer Protocol|Passim
`version 1.0 (HTTP/1.0))
`
`
`
`February 1997 RFC 2109 (HTTP State Management|Passim
`Mechanism)
`
`Ill.
`
`PERSONS RELIED UPON
`
`
` MichaelFree
`
`.
`Kevin Almeroth
`Scott Delman
`Andreas Berz
`
`Marc
`
`Rennhard
`Ne
`are
`BernhardPlattner
`Inventors/Authors ofPrior Art
`References Cited Herein
`
`Department of Computer Science at Princeton University
`35 Olden Street
`Princeton, NJ 08540-5233
`University of California
`Santa Barbara, CA 93106-5110
`1601 Broadway, 10th Floor
`New York, NY 10019-7434
`Hallwylstrasse 15, CH-3003
`Bern, Switzerland
`Technikumstrasse 9, 8401
`.
`.
`>
`Winterthur, Switzerland
`Gloriastrasse 35, 8092
`Ziirich, Switzerland
`Aslisted in references, or unknown
`
`The foregoing disclosure is made in an abundanceofcaution in view of 35 U.S.C. § 282(c).
`
`Bright Data has been previously put on notice of the patents, patent publications, publications, and
`
`individuals mentioned above,at least through Oxylabs’ Initial Invalidity Contentions and Accom-
`
`panying Document Production and AmendedInvalidity Contentions, as well as through the expert
`
`reports of Dr. Michael Freedman and Dr. Kevin Almeroth, including all appendices and exhibits
`
`Code200, UAB,etal. v. Bright Data Ltd.
`IPR2022-00861, EX. 2002
`4of7
`
`
`
`Case 2:19-cv-00395-JRG Document 450 Filed 07/16/21 Page 5 of 7 PageID #: 24340
`
`
`
`thereto, each of which were disclosed on or before the deadlines set forth by the Docket Control
`
`Order for this case. The disclosures set forth in Oxylabs’ Initial Invalidity Contentions and Ac-
`
`companying Document Production and Amended Invalidity Contentions, as well as through the
`
`expert reports of Dr. Michael Freedman and Dr. Kevin Almeroth are hereby incorporated by ref-
`
`erence as if set forth fully herein.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`5
`
`Code200, UAB, et al. v. Bright Data Ltd.
`IPR2022-00861, EX. 2002
`5 of 7
`
`
`
`Case 2:19-cv-00395-JRG Document 450
`
`Filed 07/16/21 Page 6 of 7 PagelD #: 24341
`
`Dated: July 16, 2021
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`Avcech
`
`BRETT C. GOVETT
`
`Texas State Bar No. 08235900
`brett.govett@nortonrosefulbright.com
`NORTON ROSE FULBRIGHT US LLP
`2200 Ross Avenue, Suite 3600
`Dallas, Texas 75201
`Telephone: (214) 855-8000
`Telecopier: (214) 855-8200
`
`DANIEL S. LEVENTHAL
`Texas State Bar No. 24050923
`daniel.leventhal@nortonrosefulbright.com
`NORTON ROSE FULBRIGHT US LLP
`1301 McKinney, Suite 5100
`Houston, Texas 77010-3095
`Telephone: (713) 651-5151
`Telecopier: (713) 651-5246
`
`MICHAEL C. SMITH
`Texas State Bar No. 18650410
`michael.smith@solidcounsel.com
`SCHEEF & STONE, LLP
`113 East Austin Street
`Marshall, Texas 75670
`Telephone: (903) 938-8900
`Telecopier: (972) 767-4620
`
`STEVEN CALLAHAN
`
`Texas State Bar No. 24053122
`scallahan@ccrglaw.com
`CRAIG TOLLIVER
`Texas State Bar No. 24028049
`ctolliver@ccrglaw.com
`GEORGET. “JORDE” SCOTT
`
`Texas State Bar No. 24061276
`jscott@ccrglaw.com
`MITCHELL SIBLEY
`
`Texas State Bar No. 24073097
`msibley@ccrglaw.com
`JOHN HEUTON
`Admitted Pro Hac Vice
`jheuton@ccrglaw.com
`CHARHON CALLAHAN
`ROBSON & GARZA, PLLC
`3333 Lee Parkway, Suite 460
`Dallas, Texas 75219
`Telephone: (214) 521-6400
`Telecopier: (214) 764-8392
`
`Counselfor Defendants Teso LT, UAB,
`Oxysales, UAB, and Metacluster LT, UAB
`
`Code200, UAB,et al. v. Bright Data Ltd.
`IPR2022-00861, EX. 2002
`6 of 7
`
`
`
`Case 2:19-cv-00395-JRG Document 450 Filed 07/16/21 Page 7 of 7 PagelD #: 24342
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`The undersignedcertifies that the foregoing documentwasfiled electronically in compli-
`ance with Local Rule CV-5(a) on July 16, 2021. As such, this document wasserved on all counsel
`who are deemed to have consented to electronic service. Local Rule CV-5(a)(3)(A).
`
`A+Ct
`
`STEVEN CALLAHAN
`
`Code200, UAB,et al. v. Bright Data Ltd.
`IPR2022-00861, EX. 2002
`Tof7
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
