throbber
ENDPOINTS NE W S
`
`June 13, 2022 11:04 AM EDT
`Updated 06:26 PM
`R&D, Pharma, Cell/Gene T)(
`
`Novartis may still be grappling with
`Kymriah sales, but historic CAR-T
`promise still shines through 5-year data
`
`John Carroll
`Editor& Founder
`
`Five years after Novartis made history with the approval of
`the first CAR-T, Kymriah, we're getting a clearer picture of
`just how important the advance was for some patients.
`
`The pharma giant may still be having trouble manufacturing
`the treatment or reaching long-cherished goals of block(cid:173)
`buster revenue, but a new study shows that its positive ef(cid:173)
`fects have good odds of extending out for years. And for
`many, it's looking curative.
`
`The five-year relapse-free survival rate was 44%, says Novar(cid:173)
`tis, and the median RFS was 43 months. "The median event(cid:173)
`free survival (EFS) for patients in remission within three
`months of infusion (n~65) was 43.8 months."
`
`WEBINARS
`
`EW ENDPOINTS
`Beyond vaccines:
`Where mRNA technology goes nex·
`
`28 FEBRUARY
`
`Ca1
`
`"These data mark a moment of profound hope for children,
`young adults and their families with relapsed or refractory B(cid:173)
`cell ALL, as relapse after five years is rare," said Stephan
`Grupp, the inaugural director of the Susan Sand Stephen
`Kelly Center for Cancer Immunotherapy at Children's Hospi(cid:173)
`tal of Philadelphia. "Since the approval of Kymriah nearly
`five years ago, we have been able to offer a truly game-chang(cid:173)
`ing option to patients who previously faced a five-year sur(cid:173)
`vival rate of less than 10 percent."
`
`These continuing results alongside the success ofYescarta at
`Kite underscore the original hope that arming patient cells
`for an attack on blood cancers offered a breakthrough ap(cid:173)
`proach that would save scores of lives. It's also a reminder
`that the immediate goal of creating a second-gen, off-the(cid:173)
`shelf approach hasn't been easy, though progress is being
`made.
`
`Kymriah earned $587 million last year, a 24% gain. The rev(cid:173)
`enue steadily drags behind the rival Yescarta, from which
`Gilead earned $695 million last year.
`
`The drug has had its ups and downs in the clinic as well, with
`a fail last year in a Phase III for aggressive B-cell non(cid:173)
`Hodgkin lymphoma, costing a considerable amount in the
`still hoped-for blockbuster sales to come. But it also just won
`approval as a third-line treatment for follicular lymphoma.
`
`RELATED , 5 years later, CAR-T pioneer Kymriah offers jaw-drop(cid:173)
`ping evidence of durable remissions - even as it still proves a
`tough sell
`
`This also isn't the first time that Novartis has reported stellar
`five-year data. Last year the pharma giant announced that in
`a group of advanced, treatment-resistant NHL patients, 46%
`had achieved a complete remission, with 31 % marking pro(cid:173)
`gression-free survival at the five-year point. And researchers
`determined that durable success here hinges on patients' re(cid:173)
`sponse one year into the treatment.
`
`Correction: Novartis withdrew and corrected its initial release
`outlining survival data, changing a variety of the figures.
`
`AUTHOR
`
`John Carroll
`Editor& Founder
`
`~ john@endpointsnews.com
`ti @JohnCendpts
`in John Carroll on Linked In
`
`UPenn Ex. 2072
`Miltenyi v. UPenn
`IPR2022-00855
`Page 1
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket