`Landry, Brian R.
`Gindler, David; Frischling, Gary; Lu, John; Grover, Monica; jberniker@wc.com; DKrinsky@wc.com;
`tfletcher@wc.com; NovartisCART; Doyle, Kathryn; Behrooz, Alireza; Sapovits, Lisa; Trials
`RE: IPR2022-00853 - Patent Owner"s Request for Authorization to File Response to Petitioners’ Petition for
`Rehearing
`Wednesday, November 23, 2022 3:42:21 PM
`image002.png
`image003.png
`image004.png
`
`From:
`To:
`Cc:
`
`Subject:
`
`Date:
`Attachments:
`
`Counsel:
`
`Patent Owner is authorized to file a 15 page Opposition to Petitioner’s Request for Rehearing no
`later than COB on December 1, 2022. Petitioner may file a 5 page Reply within 5 business days
`thereafter. Patent Owner may then file a 5 page Sur-reply within 5 business days of receiving
`Petitioner’s Reply.
`
`Regards,
`
`Esther Goldschlager
`Supervisory Paralegal Specialist
`Patent Trial and Appeal Board
`(571) 272-7822
`
`From: Landry, Brian R. <Brian.Landry@saul.com>
`Sent: Wednesday, November 23, 2022 9:26 AM
`To: Trials <Trials@USPTO.GOV>
`Cc: Gindler, David <DGindler@milbank.com>; Frischling, Gary <GFrischling@milbank.com>; Lu, John
`<JLu@milbank.com>; Grover, Monica <mgrover@milbank.com>; jberniker@wc.com;
`DKrinsky@wc.com; tfletcher@wc.com; NovartisCART <NovartisCART@wc.com>; Doyle, Kathryn
`<Kathryn.Doyle@saul.com>; Behrooz, Alireza <alireza.behrooz@saul.com>; Sapovits, Lisa
`<Lisa.Sapovits@saul.com>
`Subject: IPR2022-00853 - Patent Owner's Request for Authorization to File Response to Petitioners’
`Petition for Rehearing
`
`CAUTION: This email has originated from a source outside of USPTO. PLEASE CONSIDER THE SOURCE before
`responding, clicking on links, or opening attachments.
`
`Your Honors:
`
`In response to Petitioners’ Petition for Rehearing in IPR2022-00853, Patent Owner respectfully
`requests leave to file a 15-page response, which Patent Owner proposes to file on or before
`December 2nd.
`
`Petitioners have indicated that they will consent to this request only if they are permitted to file a 5-
`page reply a week thereafter. Patent Owner does not agree to a reply and submits that no further
`
`Exhibit 3004
`
`
`
`briefing is necessary beyond providing Patent Owner an opportunity to respond. However, if the
`Board grants a reply, Patent Owner respectfully requests a sur-reply, which Petitioners do not agree
`is necessary given that Petitioners are effectively the moving party.
`
`Should the Board wish to have a call, both parties are available Monday, November 28th after 3 PM
`ET, or Tuesday, November 29th 12-1 PM ET. The parties will, of course, be happy to look for other
`times if those dates and times are not convenient for the Board.
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`/Brian R. Landry/
`Reg. No. 62,074
`Lead Counsel for Patent Owner
`
`
`Brian Landry
`Partner
`(617) 912-0969
`Brian.Landry@saul.com
`Read my bio >>
`
`131 Dartmouth Street
`Suite 501
`Boston, MA 02116
`
`
`
`
`
`"Saul Ewing LLP (saul.com)" has made the following annotations:
`+~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~+
`This e-mail may contain privileged, confidential, copyrighted, or other legally protected information. If you are not the intended recipient
`(even if the e-mail address is yours), you may not use, copy, or retransmit it. If you have received this by mistake please notify us by
`return e-mail, then delete.
`+~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~+
`
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
