throbber
TRENDSin
`Immunology
`
`Fel_)ruary 2005
`· -· ,Vf?t 26, No. 2
`pp,·65-118
`
`Editor Christine Ferguson
`
`Assistant Editor Morag Robertson
`
`Editorial Coordinator Simon Bradbrook
`
`Illustrations The Studio
`
`Publishing Manager 0. Claire Moulton
`
`Editorial Enquiries
`Trends in Immunology
`Elsevier
`84 Theobald's Road,
`London, UK WClX BRR
`Tel: +44 (0)20 7611 4400
`Fax: +44 (0)20 7611 4470
`E-mail: immunology@elsevier.com
`
`Subscription Enquiries
`E-mail: ct.subs@qss-uk.com
`
`Advisory Editorial Board
`G. Anderson, Birmingham, UK
`J.D. Ashwell, Bethesda, USA
`F.H. Bach, Boston, USA
`F.R. Carbone, Melbourne, Australia
`M.F. Flajnik, Baltimore, USA
`S. Grabbe, Munster, Germany
`B.A. Imhof, Geneva, Switzerland
`P.W. Kincade, Oklahoma City, USA
`M. Krone,nberg, La Jolla, USA
`J.D. Lambris, Philadelphia, USA
`A. Mantovani, Milan, Italy
`L.M. Moretta, Genova, Italy
`G.J.V. Nossa!, Melbourne, Australia
`P.S. Ohashi, Toronto, Canada
`L.A.J. O'Neill, Dublin, Ireland
`R.M. Ransohoff, Cleveland, USA
`K.B.M. Reid, Oxford, UK
`P. Ricciardi-Castagnoli, Milan, Italy
`C. Terhorst, Boston, USA
`K. Wood, Oxford, UK
`C.Y. Yu, Columbus, USA
`R.M. Zinkernagel , Zurich, Switzerland
`
`MMl--11
`I Research Focus
`65 Rapid control of foot-and-mouth disease
`outbreaks: is RNAi a possible solution?
`Marvin J. Grubman and Teresa de los Santos
`
`68 Gfi-1: another piece in the HSC puzzle
`Sonia Cellot and Guy Sauvageau
`
`@ji,jj.j,-
`72 Old lysosomes, new tricks: MHC II dynamics in DCs
`Amy Y. Chow and Ira Mel Iman
`79 Chronic antigenic load and apoptosis in immunosenescence
`Lia Ginaldi, Massimo De Martinis, Daniela Monti and Claudio Franceschi
`85 Vaccination against encapsulated bacteria in humans: paradoxes
`Sandra Weller, Claude-Agnes Reynaud and Jean-Claude Weill
`· ·
`90 Activation-induced .deaminase: controversies and open questions
`Vasco M. Barreto, Almudena R. Ramiro and Michel C. Nussenzweig
`
`i,t¥Mil'II.
`97 Merging complexes: properties of membrane raft assembly during lymphocyte
`signaling
`William Rodgers,-Darise Farris and Sudha Mishra
`104 The mannose receptor: linking homeostasis and immunity through sugar
`recognition
`Philip A. Taylor, Siamon Gordon and Luisa Martinez-Pomares
`111 Sinks, suppressors and antigen presenters: how lymphodepletion enhances
`T cell-mediated tumor immunotherapy
`.
`1
`,
`Christopher A. Klebanoff, Hung T. Khong, Paul A. Antony, Douglas C. Palmer and
`Nicholas P. Restifo
`
`'
`
`-
`-:~-~
`Forthco·mi
`~-=-~~~ ~ .:--:r
`CD69 is·l!n
`D. Sanchp, M
`
`· •
`

`
`.
`
`. ac;vation:'thresno1bs.for\ 1rlph~ral
`~i·mina~; t
`. Cobbold, D. Howie and H: Waldmann
`L G~aca, T:: ·
`IL-7: maint~ining.T-cell m_emory and achieving ·homeostasis ··
`L.M. e·radley, L j-tay~·es and S.L. ·swain

`,,,.
`'
`
`<
`.
`,
`.
`A stromal address ·code_ defineq by fibroblasts
`G, farsonagt AD: Fi!~.r; Oi }!aworth; G._B, N_a~h, G.E. Rainger, M. Salm~n and C.D, Buckley
`lni_mune




`
`TRENDS]
`www.trends.com
`
`Cover: The intracellular events invo lved in the assembly of pMHC II complexes occu'r in the endocytic pathway'of professional APCs.
`In this issue rnmft-lft:f). Ira Mell man and Amy Chow put forward their view thal production of, and escape by, p0MHCUC9mple-;.es in
`an otherwise 'normal' complement of endocytic organelles ocurs because these .events ~r<;_tightly link~d t_o t/]e devi lpp'Tjent ~rid
`maturation status of the APCs during an immune response. Cover ir11age by David ~oonay. <;over de0sigl) blf K~te .)onjls. '.....,l w
`
`Miltenyi Ex. 1032 Page 1
`
`

`

`ELSEVIER
`
`Sinks, suppressors and antig·en ..
`presenters: ho\N lymphodepl~tion
`enhances T cell-mediated t·u,mor
`immunotherapy
`
`Christopher A. Klebanoff1-2, Hung T. Khong 3, Paul A. Antony2, Douglas C. Palmer2·*
`and Nicholas P. Restifo2
`
`1Howard Hughes Medical Institute-National Institutes of Health Research Scholars Program, Bethesda, MD 20814, USA
`2Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892-1502, USA
`3 University of South Alabama Cancer Research Institute, 307 N. University Blvd./M SB 2015, Mobile, AL 36688-0002, USA
`
`Lymphodepletion followed by adoptive cell transfer
`(ACT) of autologous, tumor-reactive T cells boosts
`antitumor immunotherapeutic activity in mouse and in
`humans. In the most recent clinical trials, lymphodeple(cid:173)
`tion together with ACT has an objective response rate of
`50% in patients with solid metastatic tumors. The
`mechanisms underlying this recent advance in cancer
`immunotherapy are beginning to be elucidated and
`include: the elimination of cellular cytokine 'sinks' for
`homeostatic Yc-cytokines, such as interleukin-7 (IL-7),
`IL-15 and possibly IL-21, which activate and expand
`tumor-reactive T cells; the impairment of co4+co25 +
`regulatory T (Treg) cells that suppress tumor-reactive
`T cells; and the induction of tumor apoptosis and
`necrosis in conjunction with antigen-presenting cell
`activation. Knowledge of these factors could be
`exploited therapeutically to improve the in vivo function
`of adoptively transferred, tumor-reactive T cells for the
`treatment of cancer.
`
`Introduction
`Adoptive cell transfer (ACT) of large numbers of auto(cid:173)
`logous tumor-reactive T cells into a tumor-bearing host
`represents a promising therapy for the treatment of
`metastatic cancer in humans [l]. This exciting therapy
`uses the rapid ex uiuo expansion of tumor-infiltrating or
`-reactive lymphocytes (TILs), which are subsequently
`transferred in conjunction with the administration of a
`high-dose of a stimulatory cytokine, in particular inter(cid:173)
`leukin-2 (IL-2). Although other forms of immunoth erapy,
`such a s tumor-antigen (AgJ vaccination ur the admini(cid:173)
`stration of immune-stimulatin g eytokin es a lone, are
`capable of 1·aising tumor-r ,active T cells in vivo, they do
`not reliably indu ce the 1· gression ofla1·ge establis hed solid
`tumors (reviewed in Ref. 12] ). ACT is capable of mediating
`
`Corresponding author: Palmer, D .C. 1pal rncrd@ma il.nih .gov1.
`• Written in par tial fulfillm enL ot' a P hlJ in Biochemisu-y at the George Washi ngto n
`University, Washington , DC 20052, USA.
`Available online 23 December 2004
`
`tumor regression [3-61, howevet',) these effects are even
`more pronounced in the absence of host lymphocytes [7,8].
`This approach has resulted in the most consistent and
`dramatic clinical responses observed in the treatment of
`metastatic cancer [7] (Figure la).
`These clinical responses are associated with auto(cid:173)
`immune manifestations in sites that express shared
`melanocyte or melanoma Ags, such as the skin, in the
`form of vitiligo. With lymphodepletion, we have also
`observed melanocyte destruction at immune privileged
`sites, such as the eye (Figure lb,c). Although skin-de(cid:173)
`pigmentation has been previously associated with immu(cid:173)
`notherapies, inflammation of the anterior segment of
`the eye has not been previously observed, and might be
`indicative of a more potent activating stimulus. Fortu(cid:173)
`nately, these eye manifestations are treatable with local
`steroids, which do not detract from the antitumor immune
`destruction.
`I
`The specific mechanisms that contribute to this
`enhanced state of immunity remain poorly understood.
`Recent insights in two rapidly expanding fields, the
`cytokine-mediated homeostasis of mature lymphocytes
`by Yc-cytokin.es, such as IL-7, IL-15 and IL-21 , and the
`control of autoreactive T cells by CD4 +cn25 + regulatory
`T (Treg) cells, provide the foundation for what might be
`occurring after lymphodepletion. The removal of lympho(cid:173)
`cytes that compete for homeostatic cytokines or suppress
`tumor-reactive T cells might contribute to the enhance(cid:173)
`ment and subsequent tumor destruction by the adoptively
`transferr:ed T cells. The less described role of antigen(cid:173)
`presenting cell (AFC) activation by lymphodepletion
`might also have a role in T-cell activation. Knowledge of
`these factors presents th e potential for therapeutic
`exploitation in the treatment of metastatic cancer in
`humans.
`
`A link between lymphodepletion and augmented
`immune function
`It has long been observed that transfer of small numbers
`of T cells into lymphopenic hosts results in T-cell
`
`www.sciencedire<:t.com 1471 -49061$ · see fro nt mailer i>ublis hed by Elsevie r ltd , doi:10. 1016/j.it.2004.12.003
`
`Miltenyi Ex. 1032 Page 2
`
`

`

`Figure 1. Potentiation of immune response to non-mutated shared self-antigens and tumor antigens by lymphodepletion. Following adoptive cell transfer therapy with
`tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (Tlls). in the setting of chemotherapy-mediated lymphoablation: (al Computed tomography (CT) scan of liver metastases in a melanoma
`patient. Metastatic lesions progressed ra pidly before th e treatment (from day -45 to day - 25) then regressed dramatically after adoptive T-cell transfer (day + 34).
`(bl Exten sive destruction of normal melanocytes (vitiligol in a patient who experienced a rem arkable clinical response. (c) Anterior uveitis (i nflammation of the eye) in a
`patient who exhibited >99% tumor reduction Photographs co urtesy of S..A. Rosenberg.
`
`expansion, a process described as homeostatic prolifer(cid:173)
`ation [9-16]. As the T cells proliferate, they assume an
`Ag-experienced or memory phenotype, which is indicated
`byupregulation ofCD44, Ly6C and CD122 (IL-2-IL-15R~)
`[12,15]. This T-cell expansion and acquisition of a memory
`phenotype is also associated with enhanced effector
`functions, determined by ex vivo analysis of interferon-y
`(IFN-y) release and cytolysis [12,14,15]. In a recent
`autoimmunity study, King et al. showed that the inherent
`lymphopenia in non-obese diabetic (NOD) mice and
`increased expression of IL-21 drives the homeostatic
`expansion of autoreactive cells, precipitating self-tissue
`destruction [17] . Furthermore, adoptive transfer of
`nai've lymphocytic choriomenigitis virus (LCMV)-specific
`CDS + T-cell receptor (TCR) transgenic splenocytes into
`LCMV-infected lymphodepleted, but not replete, hosts
`rapidly reduced viral titers to below detection limits [13].
`Analogous results have also been observed in another
`model, based on the 2C T-cell receptor (TCR) transgenic
`model. 2C TCR transgenic T cells are specific for an
`Ld-restricted a:-ketoglutarate dehydrogenase epitope or
`the SIYRYYGL peptide in the context MHC I H2-Kb_
`These cells expand homeostatically in Rag_ 1_ mice and
`specifically treat tumors, at a comparable level to the
`T cells derived from Ag-specific vaccination [15]. Dummer
`et al. observed that adoptive transfer of a polyclonal
`population of T cells into a Rag-I- or sublethally
`irradiated mouse specifically inhibits tumor growth [18].
`It is interesting to note that in these models, lympho(cid:173)
`penic-induced activation and pathogen or tumor clearance
`are generated in the absence of Ag-specific vaccination.
`Ag-specific CDs + T cells are rnquired for pathogen or
`tumor clearance, and the need for subsequen t immuniz(cid:173)
`ation might be negated [19,20]. These model Ags have
`given us great insighL into homeostatic proliferation
`but focus primarily on Ags that are of a foreign OTigin.
`Perhaps using a self~ OT tumor-antigen might provide a
`setting that is more analogous to the human condition.
`A recently described tumor model, Pmel-1, which uses a
`transgenic CDS+ T-cell specific for both the native and
`altered peptide ligand of the melanocyte and melanoma
`
`www.sciencedirect.com
`
`differentiation molecule gplO0, might enable us to better
`model unmutated self-antigens in the clinical setting [5,21].
`-
`~
`.
`Evidence for the presence of homeostatic cellular
`· cytokine 'sinks'
`The proliferation ofadoptively transferred Tcells in lympho(cid:173)
`penic hosts can be reduced in a dose-dependent manner,
`either by increasing the total number of Ag-specific cells
`transfused or by co-transferring an 'irrelevant' population of
`Tcells [9, 15,16,22]. Host CDS + T cells have a dominant role
`in modulating both donor CDS + and CD4 + T-cell expansion
`in lymphopenic hosts [16]. In the srupe study, host CD4 +
`cells inhibited donor CD4 +, and to a lesser extent CDs +
`T-cell proliferation.
`· The ability of the host to inhibit the proliferation of
`adoptively transferred T cells could be the result of
`physical contact between T cells or competition between
`T cells for self-MHC-peptide complexes and supportive
`homeostatic cytokines (Figure 2): Nai've T-cell prolifer(cid:173)
`ation is a result of self-MHC-peptide interactions in a
`lymphopenic environment (reviewed in Ref. [23]), whereas
`memory T cells proliferate independently of these inter(cid:173)
`actions [12,16]. This is suggestive of Ag-independent
`activation, a notion that has recently received a great
`deal of attention. Some studies have focused on the role of
`host-derived IL-7 and IL-15, and more recently IL-21, Ye
`cytokines known to stimulate and induce the proliferation
`of mature T cells [24-26].
`In transgenic mice that overexpress IL-7 or IL-15, there
`is a substantial increase in the absolute number ofT cells
`[27 ,28]. This increase is driven largely by the expansion of
`CDS+ CD44 high memory T cells. Exogenous administration
`of IL-15 or induction of host expression of IL-15 in
`wikltype mice by reagents, such as poly I:C, lipopolysac(cid:173)
`charicle (LPS) and type I-IFNs, causes a selective increase
`in the proliferation of CDs·r c1144high T cells in vivo
`[29-31]. Exogenous administration of IL-7 to mice
`enhances T-cell number and function [32,33] and, in both
`intact and immunodeficient non-human primates, causes
`a considerable yet reversible increase in the circulating
`levels of naive and Ag-experienced CD4 + and CDs+
`
`Miltenyi Ex. 1032 Page 3
`
`

`

`(a)
`
`(b)
`
`~
`
`-
`
`•IL-21?
`
`• -■ IL-15
`
`♦ IL-7
`
`. .
`
`Lymphoablation ~ rJJ ' •
`and
`• • ♦ -~
`•
`'>-· ■
`I-----------+-
`transfer of tumor-
`Ag-specific tumors
`
`II
`
`Horneostptic
`-expansion ·ot
`transferred t ce1ls--
`
`Endogenous lymphocyte repertoire
`under normal homeostasis
`
`Repopula.tion with tumor-Ag-
`9pecific T cells
`
`TRENDS in Immunology
`
`Figure 2. Removal of consumptive cytokine 'sink' by lymphoablation. (a) Under normal homeostasis, a smaller quantity of cytoki nes [IL-7 (yellow), IL-15 (green) and possibly
`IL-21 (red)] are available owing to consumption by the endogenous lymphocyte population. (b) After lymphodepletion preconditioning by chemotherapy or irradiation, the
`co nsum ptive cellular cytokine 'sinks' are removed, enab ling the adoptively transferred T cells a less competitive environment a·nd greater acdess to IL-7, IL-15 and IL-21.
`(cl This is followed by preferential homeostatic expansion and re-population of the peripheral lymphoid compartments with the adoptively transferred, tumor-reactive T cells.
`
`T cells [34] . Although similar studies have yet to be
`conducted in humans, there is evidence to support an
`inverse correlation between serum levels of IL-7 and the
`severity of lymphopenia caused by conditions, such as
`AIDS and cytotoxic drug therapy (reviewed in Ref. (35]) .
`Currently, there are no data available that evaluate the
`in vivo effects ofIL-15 in primates or humans.
`Studies that examine mice deficient in IL-7 or IL-15
`have demonstrated that these cytokines have a supportive
`role in the survival and/or proliferation of adoptively
`transferred T cells in lymphodepleted hosts [36-40]. The
`absence of IL-7 inhibits nai:Ve CD4 + and CD8 + T-cell
`homeostatic proliferation and survival in a lymphopenic
`environment. The proliferation of donor cells in these
`IL- 7-t- hosts is rescued by the administration of
`exogenous IL-7 [36,41]. IL-7 has a significant role in
`na'ive T-cell homeostatic proliferation but has little impact
`on memory T-cell expansion and survival in a lymphopenic
`host [37,38]. In contrast to IL-7, IL-15 does not contribute
`to naive T-cell homeostasis but does have a pivotal role in
`memory CD8 + T-cell proliferation and durability (38] . The
`homeostatic expansion of memory CD8+ T cells does not
`rely solely on IL-7, however, these cells do constitutively
`express high levels of both IL-7Ra (CD127) and the
`components of the IL-15-IL-2 heterodimeric complex,
`IL-2-IL-15R~(CD122) and Ye (CD132), and thus might be
`sensitive to IL-7 [30,38,42].
`In summary, it is clear that cytokines can have a
`profound impact in regulating the homeostasis ofT cells in
`
`Box 1. Unresolved questions regarding the use of Ye
`cytokines
`
`• Does the absence of endogenous IL-15 impair the early or late in
`vivo pro liferation, functionality, and maintenance of adoptively
`transferred tumor-specific T cells, and thus their ability to mediate
`tumor destruction?
`• What infl uence does host-derived IL-7 alone, or in combination
`with IL-15, have on tumor-reactive T cells and their function?
`• What is the role of IL-21 in homeostatic proliferatio n, and does
`exogenous administration improve the ability of adoptive trans(cid:173)
`ferred tumor-specific T cells to kill tumor?
`
`www.sciencedirect.com
`
`both the normal and lymphopenic settings. Thf expression
`of IL-7 and IL-15 receptors on 9Uemory T cells might
`indicate that the administration of these cytokines could
`enhance both the survival and proliferation of adoptively
`transferred, tumor-reactive T cells in vivo. In a recently
`described murine tumor model [5] 1 it appe~rs that the
`long-term tumor treatment efficacy of adoptively trans(cid:173)
`ferred, tumor-specific CD8 + T cells is compromised in
`whole-body irradiated IL-15- 1- but not wildtype hosts
`[43]. Endogenously produced IL-15 might contribute to a
`sustained antitumor treatment response by adoptively
`transferred CD8+ T cells in a lymphopenic setting. It is
`likely that non-tumor-specific T cells and other immune
`cells, such as natural killer (NK) cells, consume IL-15 in
`the wildtype host. Thus, there could be competition for
`homeostatic cytokines in the replete host. It is also
`important to mention the newly discovered cytokine
`IL-21, which shares homology with IL-2 and IL-15 and
`binds their common ye receptor [44,45]. This :cytokine
`might augment the function of adJptively transferred
`tumor-specific CD8+ Tcells (17,46] and is the subject of
`ongoing investigations. Many unresolved ; questions
`regarding the use of ye receptor cytokines remain to be
`answered (Box 1).
`
`Role of regulatory cells in antitumor immunity
`Naturally occurring and induced CD4 + CD25 + Treg cells
`can potently suppress immune responses to self~Ags and
`foreign Ag~ in both humans and mice. The phenotype and
`function of Treg cells have been reviewed in detail
`elsewhere [47,48]. There are some features of Treg cells
`that might be of particular interest to tumor immuno(cid:173)
`logists. CD4 + CD25 + Treg cells express high levels of cell(cid:173)
`surface molecules typically associated with activation;
`these include CD25 (IL-2Ra), glucocorticoid-induced
`tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-receptor (GITR) and cytotoxic
`T lymph ocyte-associated Ag-4 (CTLA-4). I n addition,
`they also express a unique intracellular protein, Foxp3.
`Treg cells are completely absent in mice that are deficient
`in the genes encoding IL-2, IL-2Ra, IL-2R~ and Foxp3,
`suggesting a crucial role for both IL-2 signaling and Foxp3
`
`Miltenyi Ex. 1032 Page 4
`
`

`

`expressinn in Treg-cell ontogeny and survival [49-51]. The
`role of Treg cells in maintaining immunological tolerance
`to self-Ags has been illuminated, in part, through adoptive
`transfer experiments. A spectrum of tissue-specific auto(cid:173)
`immune diseases, including thyroiditis, oophoritis, gas(cid:173)
`t ritis and inflammatory bowel disease, occurs when
`immunodeficient mice are transfused with T cells depleted
`of CD4 + CD25 + cells [52,53]. The concomitant transfer of
`Treg cells abrogates development of these autoimmune
`diseases. In some mode1s, transfer of Treg cells after the
`onset of disease can even be curative [54]. The close
`correlation between autoimmunity an_d tumor immunity
`[5,7,55-59] suggests that Treg cells have a crucial role in
`T-cell tolerance to tumor [60--62].
`Although the significance of Treg cells in human
`cancers has only recently begun to be explored, many of
`the findings in mice could be recapitulated in humans
`[61,63,64]. Wang et al. recently reported on the isolation of
`CD4 + CD25 + TIL clones derived from a melanoma patient
`(65]. These clones displayed many of the phenotypic and
`functional properties associated with naturally occurring
`Treg cells and were antigen-specific. Another report has
`shown that Treg cells present in the circulation of patients
`vaccinated against melanoma Ags can suppress the
`proliferation of a polyclonal population of CD4 + CD25 -
`T cells [66], however, the Ag-specificity of these cells was
`not determined. Treg cells capable of suppressing the
`in vitro function of tumor-reactive T cells in humans has
`also been found in other tumors besides melanoma (67,68].
`In one instance, tumor deposits taken from patients
`with lung cancer reportedly contained large numbers of
`CD4 +cn25+ Treg cells capable of suppressing the
`proliferation of autologous TILs [68]. In contrast to these
`murine studies, no conclusive data link the in vivo
`function of tumor-reactive Treg cells and the progression
`of cancer in humans, although some recent evidence
`suggests that Treg tumor infiltration might be associated ·
`with survival of cancer patients (69]. However, removal of
`these regulatory elements (Box 2), perhaps in conjunction
`with cytolrine sinks, could reverse or prevent the tolerance
`of adoptively transferred tumor-reactive T cells (Figure 3).
`
`Effects of lymphodepleting radiation and chemotherapy
`on APC function
`Lymphodepletion before ACT uses total body irradiation
`(TBI) or cytotoxic drugs. Although these modalities were
`initially intended to deplete the lymphoid compartment of
`r ecipients, they can also facilitate the presentation of
`t wnor antigens by triggering t umor cell death and antigen
`release . Subsequently, these antigen s can be t aken up and
`presented by APCs to enhance the activation of th e
`adoptively transferred tumor-reactive cells (70].
`Indirect evidence indicates that there might be other
`beneficial effects of lymphodepletion in our current ACT
`model. Irradiation antl/ot chemotherapy leads to acti(cid:173)
`v ation of host cells, resulting in the release of prn(cid:173)
`infian.unatory cytokines, such as TNF-a., IL-1 and IL-4
`[71-74], and upre6'1.l.1ation of co-stimulatory molecules,
`such as CDS0 [75). ln a recent study, activation markers
`I-Ab (class II) and CD86 were upregulated on splenic DCs
`as early as 6 h after TBI. Furthermore, ex vivo IL-12
`WW'.V,3Ciencedirect.com
`
`Box 2. Eradication of !regs• c-
`
`Although ·Food and Drug Administration-approved drugs are
`available that can selectivel-y deplete CD25-expressing cells in
`humans, including humanized anti-Tac (anti-CD25) and ONTAK'·"
`(IL-2 conjugated !o diphtheria toxin), it ls cur(ently unknown what
`effect these reagents ·mi.ght·have on Treg cells as well as on activated
`tumor-reactive T ce·us:·

`~-·
`Until a unique cell -surl'ace, 11rfe_a·ge marker capable of 'discriminat·
`ing between Treg . and activai~ci.:r cells can be .discovered, non·
`specific lymphodepletion r-night _pe the only practical approach to
`removing Treg cells from patient; to·r the purpose of augmenting
`their in vivo immune reactivity.to a tumor.

`
`production was significantly higher from DCs isolated 6 h
`· after irradiation than DCs from non-irradiated mice [76].
`Consistent with this finding, serum levels of IL-12 were
`also increased in these rnice. Elimination of competitive
`T cells through lymphodep1etion might improve donor
`T-cell access to, and activation by, antigen-bearing APCs
`[77), although other workers have found that competition
`might not play an influential role [78].
`In addition to enhanced APC function and- availability,
`the preconditioning regimen can\1.amage the integrity of
`mucosa! barriers through radiation-induced apoptosis of
`the cells lining these organs. Damage inflicted on the
`intestinal tract might permit the translocation ofbacterial
`products, such as LPS, into the systemic circulation [79] .
`LPS activates T cells in vivo [31] and might enhance the
`antitumor response. Thus, proinfiammatory cytokines
`and microbial products provide crucial 'danger signals'
`for the activation and maturation of DCs, thus enhancing
`T cell-mediated tumor treatment.
`Although initially beneficial, lymphodepletion can
`depress the absolute number of host APCs. As reported
`in several nmrine studies, the total number of mono(cid:173)
`cytes, macrophages and DCs are only slightly reduced at
`6 and 24 h but are significantly reduced 5 days after TBI
`[71,76]. This could be detrimental in the case of the
`current tumor therapy model, which requires an active
`vaccination for successful tumor therapy [5]. Interest(cid:173)
`ingly, late clearance did not hinder 1the activation of the
`donor T cells [76). This corroborates with several reports
`that demonstrate antigenic stimulation, befqre APC
`clearance, is all that is required to initiate activ ation
`and proliferation of T cells [80,81].
`
`Therapeutic implications and future directions
`It is clear t h at lymphodepletion before adoptive transfer of
`tumor-r eactive T cells into animals and humans with
`cancer augments in vivo function of th e transferred cells
`and the therapeutic outcome. Increased access to t he
`homeostatic cytokines, such as IL-7 and IL-15 , th rough
`elimination of cytokine sinks, eradication of the suppres(cid:173)
`sive influence of Treg cells and enhancement of APC
`activation and availability appear to be the underlying
`mechanisms involved in this paradigm (Figure 4). The
`mechanisms are complex, however, elucidation through
`the use of targeted cytokine administr ation, add-back of
`sink or suppressor elements and selective deletion or
`addition of APCs might explain how these mechanisms
`interact.
`
`Miltenyi Ex. 1032 Page 5
`
`

`

`(a)
`
`Lymphoreplete
`
`(b)
`
`Lymph nodes
`
`Melanoma
`
`~
`
`·-~J.o, .
`t
`
`T~mor
`excised ·
`\
`
`Administration of
`ex vivo expanded Tlls
`
`'
`
`Tumor sites
`
`~p MHC I
`~ MHC II
`tl IL-2R
`
`1:i T helper
`.
`Treg
`tji CTL
`
`~ TAA
`
`•
`IL-2
`♦ IL-7
`♦ IL-10
`
`111
`
`ll-15
`
`♦ TGF-~
`
`TRENDS in Immunology
`'
`Figure 3. Removal of the inhibitory effect of Treg cells and activation of DCs by lymphoablation. (al Under normal homeostasis, Treg cells (red) i'n the tumor draining lymph
`node (TDLN), might exert inhibitory effects on the transferred tumor-specific T cells !blue). In add ition, Treg cells m ight prevent CD4.,. Th cells (green) from providing
`supportive cytokines, such as IL-2 (blue). OCs (pink) in the tumor, wh ich cross-present tumor-associated antigens (TAAs), m ight induce tolerance in the absence of
`inflammation and in the presence of immunosuppressive cytokines, such as IL-10 (brown) and TGF-13 (purple). The net o utcome of these inhibitory factors cou ld abrogate an
`effective antitumor response. (bl After t he induction of lymphopenia, ex vivo expanded tumor-reactive Tlls are adoptively transferred (blue). This preconditioning before cell
`transfer effectively eliminates Treg cel ls and other cytokine-competing cells, thus removi ng i nhibition and freeing supportive cytokines, such as IL-2, IL-7 {yellow) and IL-15
`(green). The ablative conditioning might also activate DCs that are capable of cross-presenting TAAs in the presence of danger signals. The effect of ablation is a 'permissive'
`and activating environment that augments tumor-specific T cell-induced tu mor destruction.
`
`Other modalities that mimic or enhance the positive
`effects of lymphodepletion could have great therapeutic
`potential. The exogenous administration of supportive
`cytokines, such as IL-2, IL-7, IL-15 or IL-21, either alone
`or in concert, could stimulate the adoptively transferred
`T cells and enhance their tumor-killing ability. Ways to
`selectively deplete or inhibit CD4 + CD25+ Treg cells
`with the use of antibodies against CD25 or GITR remain
`the pursuit of many workers, although clear effects have
`been less then forthcoming. Modulation of adoptively
`transferred cells either through overproduction of
`cytokines, such as IL-7, IL-15 (43] or IL-21, pr cytok.ine
`receptors, such as IL-7Ra and IL-15Ra., are currently
`being explored as possible means to enhance 'l'-cell
`www.sciencedirect.com
`
`function
`in vivo. Reagents that stimulate host
`expression of IL-15 and IL-15Ra. [30,31,82], including
`type I IFNs, CpG DNA, LPS, dsRNA and dsRNA(cid:173)
`imitator s, such as polyLC, might enhance the function(cid:173)
`ality of adoptively transferred cells.
`Finally, although IL-2 has been the preferred
`cytokine for the ex vivo [83J and in vivo [7,81 activation
`and expansion of tumor-reactive T cells, it also drives
`Treg prolifemtion and activation [84J and triggers
`aJ)Optosis in activated T cells (85]. Exploration of
`other cytokines that can drive tumor-reactive 1.1 cells,
`such as IL-7, IL-15 and IL-21, might prove to be more
`efficacious in the activation of adoptively transferred
`tumor-reactive cells.
`
`Miltenyi Ex. 1032 Page 6
`
`

`

`Eliminate
`cytpkine sinks
`
`Eradicate
`regulatory
`elements
`
`Enhance APC
`activation and
`availibility
`
`TRENDS in Immunology
`
`Figure 4. An interactive model for the mechanisms underlyi ng the impact of
`lymphodepletion on adoptively transferred T cells. (i) Elimination of cytokfne sinks:
`lymphoablation, either by chemotherapy or irradiation, reduces the consumptive
`cytokine 'sinks' created by the endogenous lymphocyte repertoire, thus enabling
`the transferred T cells a less competitive access to homeostatic cytokines, such as
`IL-7 and IL-15. (ii) Eradication of regulatory elements: Treg cells, such as the
`Co4+co25 + cells, that would otherwise exert an inhibitory effect o n th<\ transferred
`T ce ll s are diminished
`in number and
`function afte r
`lymphoabla tion.
`(iii) Enhancement of APC activation and availability: lymphoablatio n, either by
`irradiation or chemotherapy, can induce tumor apoptosis and necrosis, resulting in
`uptake and presentation of tumor antigens by APCs. Furthermore, there is some
`evidence that suggests that after lymphodepletion, APCs become activated, th us
`enhancing stimulation of the adoptively transferred T cel ls. The transferred T cel ls
`also have less competition with irrelevant T cel ls for APCs, which m ight improve
`activation. Th ese mechanisms can act independently or in synergy to augm ent the
`function of the tumor-reactive T cells.
`
`Acknowledgements
`We would like to thank Crystal L. Mackall for critical review of the
`manuscript and Steven A. Rosenberg for his support of translational
`research at the National Cancer Institute.
`
`References
`1 Dudley, M.E. and Rosenberg, S.A. (2003) Adoptive-cell-transfer
`therapy for the treatment of patients with cancer. Nat. Rev. Cancer
`3,666-o75
`2 Rosenberg, S.A. et al . (2004) Cancer immunotherapy: moving beyond
`current vaccines. Nat. Med. 10, 909-915
`3 Cheever, M.A. et al. (1982) Augmentation of the anti-tumor thera(cid:173)
`peutic efficacy of long-term cultured T lymphocytes by in vivo
`administration of purified interleukin 2. J. Exp. Med. 155, 968-980
`4 Overwijk, W.W. et al. (1998) gplO0/pmel 17 is a murine tumor rejection
`antigen: induction of 'self-reactive, tumoricidal T cells using high(cid:173)
`affinity, altered peptide ligand. J. Exp. Med. 188, 277-286
`5 Overwijk, W.W. et al. (2003) Tumor regression and autoimmunity after
`reversal of a functionally tolerant state of self-reactive CDS+ T cells.
`J. Exp. kfed. 198, 569-580
`6 Yee, C. et al. (2002) Adoptive T cell therapy using antigen-specific
`CDS + T cell clones for the treatment of patients with metastatic
`.melanoma: iii vivo persistence, migration, and antitumor effect of
`transferred T cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A 99, 16168-16173
`7 Dudley, M.E. et al. (2002) Cancer regression and a utoimmunity in
`patient, afLer clonal 1·epopnla tion with antituroor- lymphocytes .
`Scienc~ 2fl8, 850-854
`8 Dudley, M.E. et ol. (2002) A phase T study of 11011.myeloablative
`chemotherapy and adoptive transfor of a1Jtologous tumor anl:igen(cid:173)
`speciiic T lymphocytes in patients with metastatic melanoma.
`J. Immunothe1'. 25, 243-251
`9 Wu, Z. et al. (2004) Homeostatic proliferation is a barrier to
`transplantation tolerance. Nat. Med. 10, 87-92
`10 Rocha, B. and von Boehmer, I-L (1991) Peripheral selection of the T cell
`repertoire. _Science 251, 1225-1228
`
`www.sclencedirect.com
`
`11 Bell, E .B.

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket