throbber

`
`PRIVACY ONLINE:
`
`A REPORT TO CONGRESS
`
`FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
`JUNE 1998
`
`Smart Mobile Technologieseo LitEdiptanes
`Page 2023 - 1
`IPR2022-00807, AppleInc. et al. v. Smart Mobile Technologies LLC
`
`

`

`FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
`
`Robert Pitofsky
`Mary L. Azcuenaga
`Sheila F. Anthony
`Mozelle W. Thompson
`Orson Swindle
`
`Chairman
`Commissioner
`Commissioner
`Commissioner
`Commissioner
`
`BUREAU OF CONSUMER PROTECTION
`
`Authors
`
`Martha K. Landesberg
`Toby Milgrom Levin
`Caroline G. Curtin
`Ori Lev
`
`Division of Credit Practices
`Division of Advertising Practices
`Division of Advertising Practices
`Division of Credit Practices
`
`
`
`SurveyAdvisors
`
`Manoj Hastak
`Louis Silversin
`Don M. Blumenthal
`
`George A. Pascoe
`
`Division of Advertising Practices
`Bureau of Economics
`Litigation and Customer Support Center
`Information and Technology Management Office
`Litigation and Customer Support Center
`Information and Technology Management Office
`
`Smart Mobile Technologies LLC, Exhibit 2023
`Page 2023 -2
`IPR2022-00807, Apple Inc. et al. v. Smart Mobile Technologies LLC
`
`

`

`TABLE OF CONTENTS
`
`Beecqutive SUMMULY § icc cssre datebiweecadee 1
`
`Bi
`
`TiOGUCHOR:
`
`35 ccc acswaewee eee cece cette eee eee 1
`
`II. History and Overview ............ 0.0002 tte eee 2
`A.|The Federal Trade Commission’s Approach to Online Privacy ................. Z
`B.-
` Corigumer Privacy Omhie 5
`.c225.6bic ace ee v2 es eee eset wane a ee Coes zs FEATS Z
`1,
`Growth ofthe Online Market «2. 20..5.5.64 0005 cada ce hpi eds sna e dela gen 2
`a
`(Privat COMCEMS ow ge ee lee de ee bee e eens 3
`Children’s Privacy Online ...........22..0.0.00 02200002002 4
`1.
`Growth in the Number of Children Online ...........................-. 4
`2.
`Safety and Privacy Concerns ................ 0.0.0.0 02 2c eee eee 4
`
`C.
`
`III.
`
`IV.
`
`V.
`
`Fair Information Practice Principles ................000 0000000 e eee eee eee 7
`A.
`Fair Information Practice Principles Generally ............................. 7
`]
`Notice/Awareness .......-....--20 0020 e eee eee eee 7
`2.
` Choice/Consent ...........0.0.0 0.00002 tees 8
`3.
` Access/Participation ................ 0002.0 9
`4.
` Integrity/Security ..... 0.0.0.0... 002 eee eee 10
`5
`Enforcement/Redress .............00000 000 cece eee eee 10
`Application of Fair Information Practice Principles to Information Collected From
`SHOEI, 6 5.34 Soe GAAS BASS GT ESAE SALE BOK oe Rane e LG aad o.P)S FOES es 12
`1.
`Parental Notice/Awareness and Parental Choice/Consent ................ 12
`2.
`Access/Participation and Integrity/Security .................-.--422-4. 13
`
`B.
`
`Industry Association Guidelines ............... 0.0.0... 0c cee 15
`A.
`Industry Association Guidelines ...............02.00.22000 02002 e eee eee 15
`l.
`Notice/Awareness ............2.0.000 000 cece ee eee 15
`2.
`Choice/Consent ...............00 000000 cee ee 16
`3.
` Access/Participation .............0 0.000020 16
`4.
` Integrity/Security ..........0.00 0.000000 002s 16
`5
`Enforcement/Redress ............00. 00000 cece eee 16
`Guidelines Regarding Children’s Information ...........................-. 17
`
`B.
`
`Survey of Commercial Web Sites ............02.0. 020000220 19
`Fiz*
`NOWGRIOW o Adal edits wajeras fem d ead eee 19
`B.
`General Survey Findings ..............0.. 000.0000 ccc eee 21
`E.
`"Web Sues 2.25 cc2d0.6 8208 -- 0-0 eee 21
`2.
`Personal Information Collection.....................0.-0222-22000055 22
`3.
`Frequency of Disclosures ..............2...020200002 202 e eee eee eee 27
`4.
`Nature of Disclosures
`..............0.000 000000 cece eee 29
`Children’s Survey Findings ...............0.0000 000000 cece eee 31
`
`C.
`
`Smart Mobile Technologies LLC, Exhibit 2023
`Page 2023 -3
`IPR2022-00807, Apple Inc. et al. v. Smart Mobile Technologies LLC
`
`

`

`1.
`2.
`3.
`4.
`
`Personal Information Collection from Children ....................... 31
`Frequency of Disclosures ................0000000 000 e cece eee 34
`Nature of Disclosures ................... 0.0 eee eee eee ee eee 35
`Parental Involvement ..................20.. 20.2... eee eee eee eee 37
`
`VI. Conclusions .............. 0.0. ce eee eee e cnet eee neeees 39
`
`Endnotes ............ 0... c eee eee cee eee eee e eee eee e eee eeeeeeeeees 45
`
`Appendix A: Methodology
`
`Appendix B: Surfer Instructions (General and Children’s Surveys)
`
`Appendix C: Survey Samples and Results
`
`Appendix D: Supporting Data Tables
`
`Appendix E:
`
`Industry Guidelines
`
`Smart Mobile Technologies LLC, Exhibit 2023
`Page 2023 -4
`IPR2022-00807, Apple Inc. et al. v. Smart Mobile Technologies LLC
`
`

`

`Privacy Online: A Report to Congress
`
`EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
`

`

`
`A medical clinic’s online doctor-referral service invites consumers to submit their
`name, postal address, e-mail address, insurance company, any comments concerning
`their medical problems, and to indicate whether they wish to receive information on
`any of a numberoftopics, including urinary incontinence, hypertension, cholesterol,
`prostate cancer, and diabetes. The online application for the clinic’s health education
`membership program asks consumers to submit their name, address, telephone
`number, date of birth, marital status, gender, insurance company, and the date and
`location oftheir last hospitalization. The clinic’s Website says nothing about how the
`information consumersprovide will be used or whetherit will be made available to
`third parties.
`
`A child-directed site collects personal information, such as a child’s full name, postal
`address, e-mail address, gender, and age. The site also asks a child whether he or she
`has received gifts in the form of stocks, cash, savings bonds, mutual funds, or
`certificates of deposit; who has given these gifts; whether monetary gifts were invested
`in mutual funds, stocks, or bonds; and whetherthe child’s parents own mutual funds.
`Elsewhere on the site, contest winners’ full name, age, city, state and zip code are
`posted. The Website does nottell children to ask their parents for permission before
`providing personal information and does not appearto take any steps to involve
`parents. Further, the site says nothing about whether the information is disclosed to
`third parties.
`
`The World Wide Webis an exciting new marketplace for consumers.
`
`It offers easy access
`
`to a broad array of goods, services, and information, but also serves as a source of vast amounts
`
`of personal information about consumers, including children. While the online consumer market
`
`is growing exponentially, there are also indications that consumers are wary ofparticipating in it
`
`because of concerns about how their personal information is used. As the above examples show,
`
`these concernsare real, for both adults and children.
`
`The Commission has been involved in addressing online privacy issues for almost as long as
`
`there has been an online marketplace and has held a series of workshopsand hearings on such
`
`issues. Throughout, the Commission’s goal has been to encourage andfacilitate effective self-
`
`Smart Mobile Technologies LLC, Exhibit 2023
`Page 2023 -5
`IPR2022-00807, Apple Inc. et al. v. Smart Mobile Technologies LLC
`
`

`

`Privacy Online: A Report to Congress
`
`regulation as the preferred approach to protecting consumerprivacy online. These efforts have
`
`been based onthe belief that greater protection of personal privacy on the Webwill not only
`
`protect consumers, but also increase consumer confidence and ultimately their participation in the
`
`online marketplace.
`
`In this report, the Commission summarizes widely-accepted principles
`
`regarding information collection, use, and dissemination; describes the current state of information
`
`collection and privacy protection online; and assesses the extent of industry’s self-regulatory
`
`response.
`
`Governmentstudies in the United States and abroad have recognized certain core principles
`
`of fair information practice. These principles are widely accepted as essential to ensuring that the
`
`collection, use, and dissemination of personal information are conducted fairly and in a manner
`
`consistent with consumerprivacy interests. These core principles require that consumers be given
`
`notice of an entity’s information practices; that consumers be given choice with respect to the use
`
`and dissemination of information collected from or about them; that consumers be given access to
`
`information about them collected and stored by an entity; and that the data collector take
`
`appropriate steps to ensure the security and integrity of any information collected. Moreover,it is
`
`widely recognized that fair information practice codes or guidelines should contain enforcement
`
`mechanisms to ensure compliance with these core principles. With respect to the collection of
`
`information from children, a wide variety of public policies recognize the important supervisory
`
`role of parents in commercial transactions involving their children. Parental controlis also the
`
`touchstone for application offair information practice policies to the collection of information
`
`from children.
`
`The Commission solicited industry association fair information practice guidelines to assess
`
`their conformity with these core principles. This assessment showsthat industry association
`
`guidelines generally encourage members to provide notice of their information practices and some
`
`choice with respect thereto, but fail to provide for access and security or for enforcement
`
`mechanisms.
`
`The Commission also examined the practices of commercial sites on the World Wide Web.
`
`The Commission’s survey of over 1,400 Websites reveals that industry’s efforts to encourage
`
`il
`
`Smart Mobile Technologies LLC, Exhibit 2023
`Page 2023 -6
`IPR2022-00807, Apple Inc. et al. v. Smart Mobile Technologies LLC
`
`

`

`Privacy Online: A Report to Congress
`
`voluntary adoption of the mostbasic fair information practice principle — notice — havefallen
`
`far short of what is needed to protect consumers. The Commission’s survey showsthat the vast
`
`majority of Web sites — upward of 85% — collect personal information from consumers. Few of
`
`the sites — only 14%in the Commission’s random sample of commercial Web sites — provide
`
`any notice with respect to their information practices, and fewerstill — approximately 2% —
`
`provide notice by means of a comprehensive privacy policy. The results with respect to the
`
`collection of information from children are also troubling. Eighty-nine percent of children’ssites
`
`surveyed collect personal information from children. While 54% ofchildren’s sites provide some
`
`form of disclosure of their information practices, few sites take any steps to provide for
`
`meaningful parental involvementin the process. Only 23% ofsites eventell children to seek
`
`parental permission before providing personal information, fewerstill (7%) say they will notify
`
`parents of their information practices, and less than 10%provide for parental control over the
`
`collection and/or use of information from children. The Commission’s examination of industry
`
`guidelines and actual online practices reveals that effective industry self-regulation with respect to
`
`the online collection, use, and dissemination of personal information has not yet taken hold.
`
`In light of the Commission’s findings and significant consumer concerns regarding privacy
`
`online,it is evident that substantially greater incentives are needed to spur self-regulation and
`
`ensure widespread implementation of basic privacy principles. The Commissionis currently
`
`considering such incentives and possible courses of action to adequately protect the privacy of
`
`online consumers generally. The Commission will make its recommendations on this subjectthis
`
`summer.
`
`In the specific area of children’s online privacy, however, the Commission now recommends
`
`that Congress develop legislation placing parents in control of the online collection and use of
`
`personalinformation from their children. Such legislation would require Websites that collect
`
`personalidentifying information from children to provide actual notice to parents and obtain
`
`parental consent. The timing of such notice and consent would vary depending on the age of the
`
`child, and the nature and uses of the information collected. Such legislation would protect
`
`children and ensure that parents have knowledge of, and control over, the collection of
`
`iti
`
`Smart Mobile Technologies LLC, Exhibit 2023
`Page 2023 -7
`IPR2022-00807, Apple Inc. et al. v. Smart Mobile Technologies LLC
`
`

`

`Privacy Online: A Report to € ‘ongress
`
`information from their children.
`
`The development of the online marketplaceis at a critical juncture. If growing consumer
`
`concerns about online privacy are not addressed, electronic commercewill not reachits full
`
`potential. To date, industry has had only limited success in implementing fair information
`
`practices and adopting self-regulatory regimes with respect to the online collection, use, and
`
`dissemination of personal information. Accordingly, the Commission now recommendslegislation
`
`to protect children online and this summerwill recommend an appropriate response to protect the
`
`privacy ofall online consumers.
`
`Iv
`
`Smart Mobile Technologies LLC, Exhibit 2023
`Page 2023 -8
`IPR2022-00807, Apple Inc. et al. v. Smart Mobile Technologies LLC
`
`

`

`Privacy Online: A Report to Congress
`
`I.
`
`INTRODUCTION
`
`This report to Congress provides an assessmentof the effectiveness ofself-regulation as a
`
`meansof protecting consumer privacy on the World Wide Web(“the Web”).'
`
`It is based on a
`
`comprehensive online survey of the information practices of commercial Websites, including sites
`
`directed to children, conducted in March 1998; an examination of current industry guidelines
`
`governing information practices online; and the record developed in Commission hearings and
`
`workshopsheld since 1995.
`
`Part II of the report providesa brief history of the Commission’s work in the area of online
`
`privacy, and a summary of the privacy concernsraised by the new online marketplace. PartIII
`
`describes what have cometo be recognized as the core principles of privacy-protective
`
`information practices. Part IV then compares current industry guidelines with these generally
`
`accepted principles, and Part V presents the findings of the Commission’s survey of Websites.
`
`Part VI sets forth the Commission’s conclusions.
`
`Smart Mobile Technologies LLC, Exhibit 2023
`Page 2023 -9
`IPR2022-00807, Apple Inc. et al. v. Smart Mobile Technologies LLC
`
`

`

`Privacy Online: A Report to € ‘ongress
`
`II. HISTORY AND OVERVIEW
`
`A. THE FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION’S APPROACH TO ONLINE
`
`PRIVACY
`
`The Commission has been involved in addressing online privacy issues for almost as long as
`
`there has been an online marketplace.
`
`In April 1995, staff held its first public workshop on
`
`privacy on the Internet, and in Novemberof that year the Commission held hearings on online
`
`privacyas part of its extensive hearings on the implications of globalization and technological
`
`innovation for competition and consumerprotectionissues.
`
`In June 1996, the Commission conducted a two-day workshop to explore privacy concerns
`
`raised by the online collection of personal information, and the special concernsraised by the
`
`collection of personal information from children. The workshop considered an array of
`
`alternatives to address those concerns, including industry self-regulation, technology-based
`
`solutions, consumer and business education, and government regulation. A summary of the
`
`workshop testimony was published by the Commission in a December 1996staff report entitled
`
`ConsumerPrivacy on the Global Information Infrastructure. A second workshop in June 1997
`
`delved more deeplyinto these issues.’
`
`In all of these endeavors the Commission’s goals have
`
`been (1) to identify potential consumerprotection issues related to online marketing and
`
`commercial transactions; (2) to provide a public forum for the exchange of ideas and presentation
`
`of research and technology; and (3) to encourage effective self-regulation.’
`
`B. CONSUMER PRIVACY ONLINE
`
`1.
`
`GROWTH OF THE ONLINE MARKET
`
`The World Wide Webis an exciting new marketplace for consumers.
`
`It offers easy access
`
`not only to a vast array of goods and services, but also to rich sources of information that enable
`
`Smart Mobile Technologies LLC, Exhibit 2023
`Page 2023 - 10
`IPR2022-00807, Apple Inc. et al. v. Smart Mobile Technologies LLC
`
`

`

`Privacy Online: A Report to Congress
`
`consumers to makebetter-informed purchasing decisions.
`
`It also offers the convenience of
`
`shopping from the office or home. This information-rich medium also serves as a source ofvast
`
`amounts of personal information about consumers. Commercial Websites collect personal
`
`information explicitly through a variety of means, including registration pages, user surveys, and
`
`online contests, application forms, and order forms. Websites also collect personal information
`
`through meansthat are not obvious to consumers, such as “cookies.”
`
`The online consumer market is growing exponentially.
`
`In early 1997, 51 million adults were
`
`already online in the U.S. and Canada,° and 73% reported that they had shopped for product
`
`information on the World Wide Web.° By December 1997, the numberof adults online in the
`
`U.S. and Canada had climbed to 58 million, and 10 million had actually purchased a product or
`
`service online.’ Analysts estimate that Internet advertising — which totaled approximately $301
`
`million in 1996 — will swell to $4.35 billion by the year 2000.*
`
`2.
`
`PRIVACY CONCERNS
`
`While these figures suggest that the online marketplace is growing rapidly, there are also
`
`indications that consumers are wary ofparticipating in it. Surveys have shownthat increasing
`
`numbers of consumers are concerned about how their personal information is used in the
`
`electronic marketplace. This research indicates that consumers have less confidence in how online
`
`service providers and merchants handle personal information than they have in how traditionally
`
`offline institutions, such as hospitals and banks, handle such information.’ In fact, a substantial
`
`numberof online consumers would rather forego information or products available through the
`
`Webthan provide a Website personal information without knowing whatthe site’s information
`
`practices are.'” Accordingto the results of a March 1998 Business Week survey, consumersnot
`
`currently using the Internet ranked concerns aboutthe privacy of their personal information and
`
`communicationsas the top reason they have stayed off the Internet.'' Clearly, consumerscare
`
`deeply about the privacy and security of their personal information in the online environment and
`
`are looking for greater protections.'? These findings suggest that consumerswill continue to
`
`distrust online companies and will remain wary of engaging in electronic commerceuntil
`
`Smart Mobile Technologies LLC, Exhibit 2023
`Page 2023 - 11
`IPR2022-00807, Apple Inc. et al. v. Smart Mobile Technologies LLC
`
`

`

`Privacy Online: A Report to € ‘ongress
`
`meaningful and effective consumerprivacy protections are implementedin the online marketplace.
`
`If such protections are not implemented, the online marketplace will fail to reach its full potential.
`
`C. CHILDREN’S PRIVACY ONLINE
`
`1.
`
`GROWTH IN THE NUMBER OF CHILDREN ONLINE
`
`Children represent a large and rapidly growing segment of online consumers and are being
`
`actively targeted by commercial Websites.'* Children use the Web for a widevariety ofactivities,
`
`including homework, informal learning, browsing, playing games, corresponding with electronic
`
`pen pals by e-mail, placing messages on electronic bulletin boards and participating in chat
`
`rooms.'* Amongthe activities most attractive to children are those that allow them to
`
`communicatedirectly with their peers, for example, chat rooms, bulletin boards and e-mail.'°
`
`Almost 10 million (14%) of America’s 69 million children are now online, with over 4 million
`
`accessing the Internet from school and 5.7 million from home.'® Children are also avid consumers
`
`and represent a large and powerful segment of the marketplace. They are estimated to spend
`
`billions of dollars a year, and to influence the expenditureof billions more.'’ Their growing
`
`presence online, therefore, creates enormous opportunities for marketers to promote their
`
`products and services to an eager audience.'* At the same time, the Weboffers an easy way to
`
`collect large amounts of detailed marketing data from and aboutchildren.
`
`2.
`
`SAFETY AND PRIVACY CONCERNS
`
`A wide variety of detailed personal information is being collected online from and about
`
`children, often without actual notice to or an opportunity for control by parents.'’ This
`
`information may be collected from children at various places on a site: when the childis
`
`registering for a contest, enrolling in an electronic pen pal program, completing a survey, or
`
`playing a game. A child mayalso reveal such personal information in the course of participating
`
`in chat rooms or posting messages on electronic bulletin boards — areas that are publicly
`
`accessible to anyone surfing the Web.” Thesepractices present unique privacy and safety
`
`Smart Mobile Technologies LLC, Exhibit 2023
`Page 2023 - 12
`IPR2022-00807, Apple Inc. et al. v. Smart Mobile Technologies LLC
`
`

`

`Privacy Online: A Report to Congress
`
`concerns because ofthe particular vulnerability of children, the immediacy and ease with which
`
`information can be collected from them, and the ability of the online medium to circumvent the
`
`traditional gatekeeping role ofthe parent.
`
`The most potentially serious safety concern is presented by the posting of personal
`
`identifying information by and about children — j.e., information that can be usedto identify
`
`children, such as name, postal or e-mail address — ininteractive public areas, like chat rooms and
`
`bulletin boards, that are accessible to all online users. These activities enable children to
`
`communicate freely with strangers, including adults. The FBI and Justice Department’s “Innocent
`
`Images”investigation has revealed that online services and bulletin boards are quickly becoming
`
`the most powerful resources used by predatorsto identify and contact children.’ Further,
`
`anecdotal evidence indicates that many children surfing the Web claim to have experienced
`
`problems such as attempted passwordtheft and inappropriate advancesby adults in children’s
`
`chat rooms.”
`
`Traditionally, parents have instructed children to avoid speaking with strangers. The
`
`collecting or posting of personal information in chat rooms and on bulletin boards online runs
`
`contrary to that traditional safety message. Children are told by parents notto talk to strangers
`
`whom they meet on the street, but they are given a contrary message by Websites that encourage
`
`them to interact with strangers in their homes via the Web. The dangers in the Web environment
`
`are heightened by the fact that children cannot determine whether they are dealing with another
`
`child or an adult posing as a child.
`
`In addition to these safety issues are privacy concerns raised by commercial Websites’
`
`collection of personal information from children for marketing purposes. As described below,the
`
`practice is widespread and includesthe collection of personal information from even very young
`
`children without any parental involvement or awareness.
`
`There is considerable concern aboutonline collection practices that bypass parents, who
`
`havetraditionally protected children from marketing abuses.” Children generally lack the
`
`developmental capacity and judgmentto give meaningful consent to the release of personal
`
`information to a third party.”* This is an even greater problem whenchildren are offered an
`
`Smart Mobile Technologies LLC, Exhibit 2023
`Page 2023 - 13
`IPR2022-00807, Apple Inc. et al. v. Smart Mobile Technologies LLC
`
`

`

`Privacy Online: A Report to € ‘ongress
`
`incentive for releasing personal information, or whenrelease of personal informationis a
`
`prerequisite to registering for a contest, joining a kid’s club, or playing a game.”
`
`Survey data confirm that parents strongly favor limiting the collection and use of personal
`
`information from and about their children. For example, 97% of parents whose children use the
`
`Internet believe Websites should notsell or rent personal informationrelating to children, and
`
`72% object to a Website’s requesting a child’s name and address whenthe child registers at the
`
`site, even if such informationis usedonly internally.”°
`
`In sum, the immediacy and ease with which personal information can be collected from
`
`children online, combined with the limited capacity of children to understand fully the potentially
`
`serious safety and privacy implications of providing that information, have created deep concerns
`
`about current information practices involving children online.
`
`Smart Mobile Technologies LLC, Exhibit 2023
`Page 2023 - 14
`IPR2022-00807, Apple Inc. et al. v. Smart Mobile Technologies LLC
`
`

`

`Privacy Online: A Report to Congress
`
`III. FAIR INFORMATION PRACTICE PRINCIPLES
`
`A. FAIR INFORMATION PRACTICE PRINCIPLES GENERALLY
`
`Overthe past quarter century, government agencies in the United States, Canada, and
`
`Europe have studied the mannerin whichentities collect and use personal information — their
`
`“information practices” — and the safeguards required to assure those practicesare fair and
`
`provide adequate privacy protection.*’ The result has beenaseries of reports, guidelines, and
`
`model codesthat represent widely-accepted principles concerningfair information practices.”*
`
`Commonto all of these documents [hereinafter referred to as “fair information practice codes”’]
`
`are five core principles of privacy protection: (1) Notice/Awareness; (2) Choice/Consent;
`
`(3) Access/Participation; (4) Integrity/Security; and (5) Enforcement/Redress.
`
`1.
`
`NOTICE/AWARENESS
`
`The most fundamental principle is notice. Consumers should be given notice of an entity’s
`
`information practices before any personal information is collected from them. Withoutnotice, a
`
`consumer cannot make an informed decision as to whether and to whatextent to disclose personal
`
`information.*”? Moreover, three of the other principles discussed below — choice/consent,
`
`access/participation, and enforcement/redress — are only meaningful when a consumerhas notice
`
`of an entity’s policies, and his or her rights with respect thereto.*°
`
`While the scope and content of notice will depend on the entity’s substantive information
`
`practices, notice of some orall of the following have been recognized as essential to ensuring that
`
`consumers are properly informed before divulging personal information:
`
`*—identification ofthe entity collecting the data;*’
`
`*—identification of the uses to whichthe data will be put;*”
`
`-
`
`identification of any potential recipients of the data:**
`
`Smart Mobile Technologies LLC, Exhibit 2023
`Page 2023 - 15
`IPR2022-00807, Apple Inc. et al. v. Smart Mobile Technologies LLC
`
`

`

`Privacy Online: A Report to Congress
`

`
`*
`

`
`the nature of the data collected and the means by whichit is collected if not obvious
`
`(passively, by means of electronic monitoring, or actively, by asking the consumerto
`
`provide the information);**
`
`whether the provision of the requested data is voluntary or required, and the
`
`consequencesofa refusal to provide the requested information;** and
`
`the steps taken by the data collector to ensure the confidentiality, integrity and quality
`
`of the data.*°
`
`Some information practice codesstate that the notice should also identify any available
`
`consumerrights, including: any choice respecting the use of the data;*’ whether the consumer has
`
`been given a right of access to the data;** the ability of the consumerto contest inaccuracies;”’ the
`
`availability of redress for violations of the practice code;*° and how suchrights can be exercised.*!
`
`In the Internet context, notice can be accomplished easily by the posting of an information
`
`practice disclosure describing an entity’s information practices on a company’s site on the Web.
`
`To be effective, such a disclosure should be clear and conspicuous, posted in a prominent
`
`location, and readily accessible from both the site’s home page and any Web page where
`
`information is collected from the consumer.
`
`It should also be unavoidable and understandable so
`
`that it gives consumers meaningful and effective notice of what will happen to the personal
`
`information they are asked to divulge.
`
`2.
`
`CHOICE/CONSENT
`
`The second widely-accepted core principle of fair information practice is consumer choice
`
`or consent.” Atits simplest, choice means giving consumersoptions as to how any personal
`
`information collected from them may be used. Specifically, choice relates to secondary uses of
`
`information — i.e., uses beyond those necessary to complete the contemplated transaction. Such
`
`secondary uses can be internal, such as placing the consumeronthe collecting company’s mailing
`
`list in order to market additional products or promotions, or external, such as the transfer of
`
`information to third parties.
`
`Smart Mobile Technologies LLC, Exhibit 2023
`Page 2023 - 16
`IPR2022-00807, Apple Inc. et al. v. Smart Mobile Technologies LLC
`
`

`

`Privacy Online: A Report to Congress
`
`Traditionally, two types of choice/consent regimes have been considered: opt-in or opt-out.
`
`Opt-in regimes require affirmative steps by the consumerto allow the collection and/or use of
`
`information; opt-out regimes require affirmative steps to prevent the collection and/or use of such
`
`information. The distinction lies in the default rule when noaffirmative steps are taken by the
`
`consumer.** Choice can also involve more than a binary yes/no option. Entities can, and do,
`
`allow consumersto tailor the nature of the information they reveal and the uses to which it will be
`
`put.* Thus, for example, consumers can be provided separate choices as to whether they wish to
`
`be on a company’s general internal mailing list or a marketinglist sold to third parties.
`
`In order to
`
`be effective, any choice regime should provide a simple and easily-accessible way for consumers
`
`to exercise their choice.
`
`In the online environment, choice easily can be exercised by simply clicking a box on the
`
`computerscreen that indicates a user’s decision with respect to the use and/or dissemination of
`
`the information being collected. The online environmentalso presents new possibilities to move
`
`beyond the opt-in/opt-out paradigm. For example, consumers could be required to specify their
`
`preferences regarding information use before entering a Website, thus effectively eliminating any
`
`need for default rules.*°
`
`3. ACCESS/PARTICIPATION
`
`Accessis the third core principle.
`
`It refers to an individual’s ability both to access data
`
`about him or herself — i.e., to view the data in an entity’s files — and to contest that data’s
`
`accuracy and completeness.*° Both are essential to ensuring that data are accurate and complete.
`
`To be meaningful, access must encompass timely and inexpensive access to data, a simple means
`
`for contesting inaccurate or incomplete data, a mechanism by whichthe data collector can verify
`
`the information, and the means by which corrections and/or consumerobjections can be added to
`
`the datafile andsentto all data recipients.*’
`
`Smart Mobile Technologies LLC, Exhibit 2023
`Page 2023 - 17
`IPR2022-00807, Apple Inc. et al. v. Smart Mobile Technologies LLC
`
`

`

`Privacy Online: A Report to € ‘ongress
`
`4.
`
`INTEGRITY/SECURITY
`
`The fourth widely accepted principle is that data be accurate and secure. To assure data
`
`integrity, collectors must take reasonable steps, such as using only reputable sources of data and
`
`cross-referencing data against multiple sources, providing consumeraccess to data, and
`
`destroying untimely data or convertingit to anonymous form.**
`
`Security involves both managerial and technical measures to protect against loss and the
`
`unauthorized access, destruction, use, or disclosure of the data.*” Managerial measures include
`
`internal organizational measuresthat limit access to data and ensure that those individuals with
`
`access do notutilize the data for unauthorized purposes. Technical security measures to prevent
`
`unauthorized access include encryption in the transmission and storage of data; limits on access
`
`through use of passwords; and the storage of data on secure servers or computers that are
`
`inaccessible by modem.”
`
`5.
`
`ENFORCEMENT/REDRESS
`
`It is generally agreed that the core principles of privacy protection can only be effective if
`
`there is a mechanism in place to enforce them.*! Absent an enforcement and redress mechanism, a
`
`fair information practice code is merely suggestive rather than prescriptive, and does not ensure
`
`compliance with core fair information practice principles. Amongthe alternative enforcement
`
`approachesare industry

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket