throbber
DE 102 19 117 C 1
`
`(12) Patent Specification (51) Int. Cl.7:
`(19) FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF
`
` GERMANY (10) DE 102 19 117 C 1 C 12 N 15/10
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`(21) Reference:
`
`102 19 117.4-41
`(22) Application date:
`
`29/04/2002
`(43) Publication date:
`
`-
`(45) Publication date of patent grant: 30/10/2003
`
`
`
`
`
` GERMAN
`
` PATENT AND
`
` TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`
`Objections can be made within 3 months of the publication of the grant
`
` (72) Inventors:
`
`(73) Patent proprietor:
` AdnaGen AG, 30853 Langenhagen, DE
` Stefan, Monica, Dr., 30173 Hanover, DE; Krehan,
`
`
`
`
`
`
` Alf-Andreas, Dr., 30853 Langenhagen, DE; Böcher,
`
`
`
`
`
`
` Oliver, Dr., 30853 Langenhagen, DE; Waschütze,
`(74) Agent:
`
`
`
`
` Stefanie, Dr., 30169 Hanover, DE
` PFENNING MEINIG & PARTNER GbR, 80336
`(56) Publications considered for the assessment of
` Munich
`
`
`
`
` patentability:
`
`
`
`
`
`
` BIOSIS:AN:1987:48740, in Biochem. Biophys.
` Acta, 1986, 851 (3), pp. 395-406;
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`(54) Method for stabilising RNA and uses of stabilisation buffers
`
`(57) The present invention relates to a method for stabilising ribonucleic acids and uses of
`stabilisation buffers. Such methods are required for the purification of ribonucleic acids.
`According to the present invention, a stabilising solution containing lithium dodecyl sulfate is added
`to a sample containing ribonucleic acid. As a result, the ribonucleic acid is stabilised for many hours
`to days, although ribonucleic acid-cleaving enzymes may also be present in the respective sample.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`FEDERAL PRINTING OFFICE 09.03 203 440/210/7A 1
`
`DE 102 19 117 C 1
`
`Page 1
`
`Spectrum Ex. 1005
`IPR Petition - USP 10,000,795
`
`

`

`DE 102 10 117 C 1
`Description
`
`[0001] The present invention relates to a method for stabilising ribonucleic acids and uses of
`stabilisation buffers. Such methods are required for the purification of ribonucleic acids (RNA).
`
`[0002] Ribonucleic acids have a high level of information content and are more often the subject of
`molecular biological diagnostics. Unlike DNA, RNA is much more unstable and therefore more
`difficult to handle (Pasloske, 2001: Methods in Molecular Biology, vol. 160, 105-111).
`
`[0003] The RNA degradation by ubiquitous RNases before, during and after the isolation of RNA is a
`major problem, since the integrity of the RNA is a prerequisite for molecular biological diagnostics.
`
`[0004] Studies have shown that the RNA from human whole blood is significantly degraded within a
`few hours after blood collection (McFaul et al., 2000, J. Lab. Clin. Med., 135 (3), 263-269), which
`greatly restricts the possibilities for sample transport. The degradation of the RNA can lead to false
`negative results because the reduced number of transcripts in vitro due to degradation does not
`correlate with the number of transcripts in vivo.
`
`[0005] For the integrity of the RNA, the inhibition of endogenous RNases during the cell lysis and the
`avoidance of contamination with exogenous RNases during the RNA isolation are essential.
`
`[0006] The inhibition of RNases can be achieved by adding chemical agents or some enzymes:
`- Strongly denaturing agents such as 8 M urea, 4 mol/l guanidinium hydrochloride, 4 mol/l
`guanidinium isothiocyanate cause both the lysis of the cell and the inactivation of RNases.
`- Vanadyl ribonucleoside complexes (VRC): bind a wide range of RNases, but also inhibit
`other enzymes (see below)
`- Complexing agents: e.g. solids such as bentonite, macaloid, which bind he RNases and
`thereby separate them from the RNases in solutions
`- Enzymes:
`Proteinase K digests cell proteins and is very active in the presence of sodium dodecyl sulfate
`(SDS) at 65°C (1); RNase inhibitor from human placenta, Rnasin: they protect the RNA from
`degradation only under non-denaturing conditions (Murphy et al., 1995: BioTechniques, Vol.
`18, No. 6, 1068-1073).
`
`
`[0007] All of these reagents have severe limitations: low RNases activity spectrum, inhibition of
`additional enzymes that are essential for the subsequent detection of RNA (VRC’s inhibit RNA
`polymerases and in vitro transcription/translation (Pasloske, 2001: Methods in Molecular Biology,
`vol. 160, 105-111), inapplicable speed during cell lysis (RNAsin and other enzymatic RNase inhibitors
`are only active under non-denaturing conditions and are therefore not suitable for inhibition during
`the first steps in RNA purification).
`
`[0008] The object of the present invention is to provide an improved stabilisation method for
`ribonucleic acids.
`
`
`
`
`Page 2
`
`

`

`DE 102 10 117 C 1
`
`[0009] This object is achieved by the use of lithium dodecyl sulfate according to claim 1 and the
`method according to claim 10. Advantageous further developments of the use according to the
`invention and of the method according to the invention are given in the respective dependent
`claims.
`
`[0010] The present invention is based on the finding that lithium dodecyl sulfate stabilises RNA in
`solution. It could surprisingly be shown that the RNA is stabilised by adding lithium dodecyl sulfate
`for many hours to days, although RNases were present in the respective solution. This plays a role in
`particular when animal cells are opened up, for example by lysis or osmotic shock, and the RNA and
`RNases are present together in the solution.
`
`[0011] A stabilising solution with a lithium dodecyl sulfate content of 0.1% (weight/volume) to 5%
`(weight/volume) is particularly advantageous.
`
`[0012] It is particularly advantageous if the stabilising solution contains approx. 1% (weight/volume)
`lithium dodecyl sulfate.
`
`[0013] Furthermore, the stabilising effect is supported if lithium chloride (LiCL) is added to the
`stabilising solution as a salt, advantageously at a concentration between 100 mmol/l and 2 mol/l.
`
`[0014] The stabilising effect is further supported by adding dithiothreitol (DTT).
`
`[0015] The following is an example of carrying out an RNA stabilisation according to the invention.
`
`[0016] Fig. 1 shows the results of a measurement on freshly prepared RNA and after a 3-hour, 24-
`hour or 48-hour incubation in the stabilising solution according to the invention. In each case, a total
`of 4 samples were examined which contained no tumour cells, 10 tumour cells, 100 tumour cells or
`1000 tumour cells per ml of blood sample.
`
`[0017] For this purpose, a defined number of tumour cells (0/10/100/1000 cells) were inoculated
`into 1 ml of blood from a healthy control person in each case, separated from the non-binding blood
`components using antibody-coupled magnetic particles and were taken up in 100 μl lysis buffer (50
`mM Tris-HCl pH 7.5; 0.5% (vol/vol) Triton X100). The separated cells are lysed on the particles.
`
`[0018] After separating the immunomagnetic particles, 100 μl of the RNA-stabilising buffer
`containing
`150 mmol/l Tris-HCl pH 7.5
`1.5 mol/l LiCl
`20 mmol/l EDTA pH 8.0
`2% (weight/volume) lithium dodecyl sulfate
`10 mmol/l dithiothreitol
`are added. This solution was incubated for various times (0, 3, 24 and 48 hours) at room
`temperature. The mRNA was then isolated using oligo(dT)25-coupled magnetic particles (Dynabeads
`from Dynal). The processing was carried out in accordance with the protocol in the Dynal company
`
`
`Page 3
`
`

`

`DE 102 10 117 C 1
`
`manual. The lysate was incubated with the magnetic particles (20 μl oligo(dT)25 Dynabeads per
`batch) for 10 minutes at room temperature while rotating on the overhead shaker. This was then
`followed by 2 washing steps each with 100 μl washing buffer A or washing buffer B.
`A:
`10 mmol/l Tris-HCl pH 7.5
`0.15 mol/l LiCl
`1 mmol/l EDTA pH 8.0
`0.1% (weight/volume) lithium dodecyl sulfate
`B:
`10 mmol/l Tris-HCl pH 7.5
`0.15 mol/l LiCl
`1 mmol/l EDTA pH 8.0
`
`[0019] After the first washing step with washing buffer B, the reaction solution is transferred to a
`new reaction vessel. The mRNA bound to the magnetic particles is then washed with 100 μl of ice-
`cold 10 mmol/l Tris-HCl solution and resuspended in 29.5 μl of RNAs-free water. After incubation for
`5 minutes at 50°C, with gentle shaking, conventional cDNA synthesis took place. A polymerase chain
`reaction (PCR) was then carried out with tumour marker-specific primers. The amplificates were
`separated and visualised in the Agilent Bioanalyzer 2100. The method steps of reverse transcription
`and amplification took place under the conditions described below:
`
`
`Reverse transcription
`
`[0020] The cDNA synthesis took place at 37°C for 1 hour with subsequent inactivation of the reverse
`transcriptase for 5 minutes at 93°C and cooling on ice. (SensiscriptTM Reverse Transcriptase Kit;
`Qiagen, Hilden)
`
`
`Table 1
`Components of the cDNA synthesis
`
`The cDNA synthesis took place in a 40 μl reaction batch
`Volume
`Final concentration
`29.5 μl
`
`4 μl
`4 μl
`0.5 μl
`2 μl
`
`1 x
`0.5 mmol/l in each case
`0.5 U
`4 U
`
`Components
`RNA in water
`10 x RT buffer
`DNTP mix (every 5 mmol/l)
`RNase inhibitor
`Reverse transcriptase
`
`
`Amplification
`
`[0021] The polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was carried out with tumour marker-specific primers.
`
`
`Used PCR primers
`
`CK20 sense T60: ATC TCC AAG GCC TGA ATA AGG TCT
`CK20 antisense T61: CCT CAG TTC CTT TTA ATT CTT CAG T
`
`Page 4
`
`

`

`DE 102 10 117 C 1
`
`Table 2
`Components of the PCR reaction
`
`
`Volume
`Components
`8 μl
`CDNA
`5 μl
`10 x PCR buffer*
`1 μl
`DNTP mix
`50 μmol in each case
`Primer
`0.5 μl
`Taq-DNA polymerase**
`ad 50 μl
`H2O
`(*contains 15 mmol/l MgCl2; **HotStarTaqTM DNA Polymerase; Qiagen, Hilden)
`
`
`Final concentration
`
`1 x
`200 μmol in each case
`
`2.5 U
`
`
`Table 3
`PCR conditions
`
`
`95°C 15 min
`
`94°C 1 min
`58°C 1 min
`72°C 1 min
`72°C 10 min
`4°C Pause
`
`Pre-denaturation
`Cycle (35 cycles)
`1. Denaturation
`2. Annealing
`3. Extension
`Final extension
`
`
`
`
`[0022] 1 μl of the respective PCR mixture was separated on a DNA chip (500) in the Agilent
`Bioanalyzer 2100 and the separation result was electronically documented.
`
`[0023] Fig. 1 now shows in lane 1 a ladder made up of markers for the molecular weight. Lanes 2-5,
`6-9, 10-13 and 14-17 correspond to the samples that were incubated 0, 3, 24 and 48 hours before
`isolating the RNA in the stabilising solution. In each of these groups of lanes, one lane shows the
`sample with 0, 10, 100 or 1000 tumour cells in the starting blood sample, as is labelled above the
`figure.
`
`[0024] It can be seen immediately that the tumour marker marked with an arrow can be seen clearly
`and with almost unchanged intensity in the samples incubated for 0, 3 and 24 hours in each of the
`samples which contained tumour cells. Only in the samples incubated for 48 hours is no tumour
`marker signal (band) to be seen for the sample with 10 tumour cells in the starting blood sample.
`Evidently, a slight breakdown of RNA has taken place here. Nevertheless, the tumour marker can still
`be clearly demonstrated in the blood samples with 100 or 1000 tumour cells. This shows that the
`stabilising solution has the effect that the RNA in the stabilising solution is not degraded or is
`extremely slowly degraded over at least 1 day and, if the RNA concentration is appropriate, for 2
`days.
`
`
`Claims
`
`1. Use of lithium dodecyl sulfate for stabilisation of RNA in a solution.
`2. Use according to the preceding claim for stabilisation of RNA in a biological sample.
`3. Use according to the preceding claim for stabilisation of RNA in a cell disruption.
`
`Page 5
`
`

`

`DE 102 10 117 C 1
`
`4. Use according to the preceding claim for stabilisation of RNA in a cell disruption of animal or
`human cells.
`5. Use according to any one of the preceding claims for stabilisation of RNA in a blood sample.
`6. Use according to any one of the preceding claims in a concentration of 0.1% to 5%
`(weight/volume) of lithium dodecyl sulfate.
`7. Use according to any one of the preceding claims in a concentration of 2% (weight/volume) of
`lithium dodecyl sulfate.
`8. Use according to claim 6, characterised in that the solution further contains the following
`components:
`10-500 mmol/l Tris-HCl pH 6.5-8.5 and/or
`100-3500 mmol/l LiCl and/or
`1-100 mmol/l EDTA and/or
`1-50 mmol/l dithiothreitol.
`9. Use according to claim 7, characterised in that the solution further contains the following
`components:
`150 mmol/l Tris-HCl pH 7.5 and/or
`1.5 mmol/l LiCl and/or
`20 mmol/l EDTA and/or
`10 mmol/l dithiothreitol.
`10. A method for stabilisation of RNA in a sample, in biological samples, samples containing animal
`and/or human cells and/or in blood samples, characterised in that the sample is mixed with a
`stabilising solution which contains lithium dodecyl sulfate.
`11. The method according to the preceding claim, characterised in that the sample is mixed with a
`stabilising solution which contains 0.1% to 5% (weight/volume) of lithium dodecyl sulfate.
`12. The method according to any one of the two preceding claims, characterised in that the sample
`is mixed with a stabilising solution which contains 2% (weight/volume) of lithium dodecyl sulfate.
`13. The method according to any one of claims 10 to 12, characterised in that the sample is mixed
`with a stabilising solution which contains
`10-500 mmol/l Tris-HCl pH 6.5-8.5 and/or
`100-3500 mmol/l LiCl and/or
`1-100 mmol/l EDTA and/or
`1-50 mmol/l dithiothreitol.
`14. The method according to claim 12, characterised in that the sample is mixed with a stabilising
`solution which contains
`150 mmol/l Tris-HCl pH 7.5 and/or
`1.5 mmol/l LiCl and/or
`20 mmol/l EDTA and/or
`10 mmol/l dithiothreitol.
`15. The method according to any one of claims 10 to 14, characterised in that the RNA is then
`isolated from the sample, purified or enriched.
`16. The method according to any one of claims 10 to 15, characterised in that, after the stabilising
`solution has been added, the free RNA is bound to a substrate, the latter is washed at least once,
`and then the RNA is detached from the substrate.
`17. The method according to the preceding claim, characterised in that magnetic particles are used
`as the substrate.
`18. The method according to any one of claims 16 or 17, characterised in that the RNA is detached
`from the particles using a 10 mmol/l Tris-HCl solution in H2O, pH 7.5.
`19. The method according to any one of claims 16 to 18, characterised in that the RNA is taken up in
`a RNase-free buffer after it has been detached from the substrate.
`
`Page 6
`
`

`

`DE 102 10 117 C 1
`
`
`20. The method according to any one of claims 10 to 19, characterised in that components
`containing RNA are separated from the sample before the stabilising solution is added to the
`separated components.
`21. The method according to any one of claims 10 to 20, characterised in that cells are separated
`from a blood sample before the stabilising solution is added to the separated cells.
`
`
`1 page of drawings follows
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Page 7
`
`

`

`
`DRAWINGS PAGE 1
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Number:
`
`Int. Cl.7:
`Publication date:
`
`DE 102 19 117 C1
`C 12 N 15/10
`30 October 2003
`
`Tumour marker
`
`
`
`
`
`203 440/210
`
` 0 hours; 3hours; 24hours; 48hours;
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Tumour cell number
`
`Page 8
`
`

`

`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`VERIFICATION OF A TRANSLATION
`
`I, the below named translator, hereby declare that:
`
`My nameandpost office address are as stated below:
`That I am knowledgeable in the English language and in the German language, andthat ]
`believe the English translation ofthe attached German document
`DE10219117C1(Stefan)is true and complete.
`I hereby declare that all statements made herein ofmy own knowledgeare true and that
`all statements made on information and beliefare believed to be true; and further that
`these statements were made with the knowledgethatwillful false statements and thelike
`so made are punishable byfine or imprisonment, or both, under Section 1001 of Title 18
`ofthe United States Code and, that such willful false statements mayjeopardize the
`validity ofthe application or any patent issued thereon.
`
`Date: 26 May, 2021
`
`Full nameofthe translator: Ian Nicholas Harper CLARK
`
`Signatureofthe translator: Pan)
`
`Post Office Address: Clayallee 333, 14169 Berlin, GERMANY
`
`Page 9
`
`Page 9
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket