throbber
J. Physiol. (1976), 263, pp. 101-114
`With 8 text figures
`Printed in Great Britain
`
`101
`
`SUGARS AND SUGAR DERIVATIVES
`WHICH INHIBIT THE SHORT-CIRCUIT CURRENT OF THE
`EVERTED SMALL INTESTINE OF THE RAT
`
`BY I. W. MUFLIH* AND W. F. WIDDAS
`From the Department of Physiology, Bedford College,
`Regent's Park, London NW 1 4NS
`
`(Received 29 December 1975)
`
`SUMMARY
`1. The short-circuit current of everted rat intestine supported on a
`perforated cannula proved to be stable for up to 3 hr and has been used
`to study competition between transportable and non-transportable sugars.
`2. 4,6-O-Ethylidene-a-D-glucopyranose (ethylidene glucose) and 4,6-O-
`benzylidene-a-D-glucopyranose (benzylidene glucose), two non-trans-
`portable inhibitors of the hexose transfer system in human erythrocytes,
`were found to reduce the short-curcuit current generated by transportable
`sugars such as galactose or 3-0-methyl glucose.
`3. These compounds were also found to reduce the basal short-circuit
`current established by the everted intestine in a sugar-free Krebs solution.
`Both types of inhibition approached saturation at the higher concentra-
`tions used.
`4. Similar inhibitory properties were shown by mannose, a non-actively
`accumulated monosaccharide, and by the fl-disaccharides lactose and
`cellobiose.
`5. It is suggested that this common pattern of behaviour is due to the
`ability of these compounds to react with the sites for active hexose trans-
`fer but without translocation by the system. The significance of the in-
`hibition of the basal short-circuit current is briefly discussed in this
`context.
`
`INTRODUCTION
`Soon after the publication of the hypothesis by Crane (1960), Crane,
`Miller & Bihler (1961) regarding Na÷ dependent sugar transport across the
`mucosal membrane of the intestine, it was considered, e.g. by Schultz &
`Zalusky (1963a, b) that the increments in the short-circuit current
`induced by the actively transported sugars were in support of this
`* Present address: Physiology Department, College of Medicine, Al-Mustansiriyah
`University, Baghdad, Iraq.
`
`MYLAN EXHIBIT - 1041
`Mylan Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Bausch Health Ireland, Ltd. - IPR2022-00722
`
`

`

`I. W. MUFLIH AND W. F. WIDDAS
`
`102
`hypothesis. During the last 15 years many studies have been made to
`determine the underlying process of active sugar accumulation on the basis
`of short-circuit current and potential difference measurements using in vitro
`preparations (e.g. Barry, Dickstein, Matthews & Smyth (1961), Barry,
`Smyth & Wright (1965), Clarkson, Cross & Tool (1961), Quay & Armstrong
`(1969) and Field, Fromm & McColl (1971) but the short-circuit current
`techniques had not so far been used to study competitive inhibition
`between sugars. Nevertheless a few reports have demonstrated that
`fructose (Asano, 1964; Lyon & Crane, 1966) and 2-deoxyglucose (Lyon &
`Crane, 1966) inhibited the basal electrical parameters recorded in sugar-
`free solutions. Barry, Eggenton & Smyth (1969) showed that mannose
`(28 mm) inhibited the basal transepithelial potential, an effect which they
`ascribed to osmotic gradients.
`Baker & Widdas (1973) showed that 4,6-O-ethylidene-a-D-gluco-
`pyranose (ethylidene glucose) could react strongly with the hexose trans-
`fer system in red cells and competitively inhibit glucose exit from the cell
`but could not enter red cells on the hexose system. Similar observations
`with a related compound, 4,6-O-benzylidene-x-D-glucopyranose (benzyl-
`idene glucose) have been reported on the hexose transfer system of the
`red cells by Novak & Lefevre (1974).
`In the present work, therefore, we set out to investigate the effects of
`known non-transportable competitive inhibitors of the hexose system in
`human red cells on the short-circuit current of everted rat intestine in-
`duced by the actively transported sugars. It was considered that if the
`compound, e.g. (ethylidene glucose, benzylidene glucose) could react with
`the intestinal hexose transport system without being transported by it,
`then it should inhibit competitively those increments in electrical para-
`meters which were dependent upon a small concentration of the actively
`transported sugars.
`In addition to ethylidene glucose (EG) and benzylidene glucose (BG),
`the effects of mannose and lactose on the short-circuit current generated
`by the actively transported sugars were investigated. In a continuation of
`this study the effects of cellobiose and phloridzin on the basal short-
`circuit current recorded in sugar-free Krebs solution were examined.
`A preliminary account was presented to the Physiological Society
`(Muflih & Widdas, 1976).
`
`METHODS
`Male Albino rats of Wistar strain were used in this work. The rats were adult and
`usually in the weight range 350-450 g. They were maintained on a standard com-
`mercial diet, food and water being available ad libitum. Under Nembutal (pento-
`barbitone sodium) anaesthesia, the peritoneal cavity was opened by mid-line
`incision and the exposed viscera was rinsed continuously with Krebs saline solution
`
`

`

`SUGAR INHIBITORS OF SHORT-CIRCUIT CURRENT 103
`
`at laboratory temperature. Two openings were made through the intestinal wall,
`one at each end of the small intestine. The proximal opening was connected to a
`calibrated saline (Krebs) reservoir via a polyethylene tube. Intestinal contents
`were gently washed out by administering 25 ml. Krebs saline solution (at laboratory
`temperature) from the reservoir. A length of jejunum (8-10 cm long) was excised
`from the region in between 25-35 or 35-45 cm from the end of the duodenum. The
`excised segment was then immersed in the Krebs saline solution and a length of
`thin glass rod was passed through the lumen. The intestine was ligatured near to
`the end of the segment which was rapidly everted and passed over a perforated
`
`Agar p.d.
`electrode \, 4,
`
`Ag, AgCl
`
`Current
`electrode
`/AgiAgC1
`
`O
`
`/C O 2
`
`• 0
`
`0
`
`0
`
`0
`
`B
`
`•
`0
`I
`
`A
`
`Fig. 1. A, supporting cannula for everted segment of intestine. B, cannula
`and segment in electrode assembly in water-jacketed bath.
`
`supporting cannula made from a disposable needle container (Fig. 1). Lightly tied
`ligatures secured the segment above and below the perforations. The effective area
`of the mucosa between the two ligatures (without making any allowance for the
`macroscopic and microscopic infoldings of the mucosa) was 10 cm2. The time that
`elapsed between excision of the segment and the onset of incubation was less than
`3 min. The supporting cannula (with the gut) was mounted in an electrode assembly
`similar to that described by Barry et al. (1965). Current was supplied by a series of
`12 V dry batteries via a potentiometer which was driven by a low-inertia motor
`energized by an amplifier connected to the output of the potential measuring device
`(a Vibron Electrometer 33B) so as to form a simple feed-back servo which short-
`circuited the preparation. The current was monitored by a Kipp recording micro-
`graph BD2 (Kipp & Zonen).
`
`12
`
`P H Y 263
`
`

`

`104
`
`I. W. MUFLIH AND W. F. WIDDAS
`Solutions were made in Krebs-Henseleit (1932) saline of composition (mm):
`Na+ 144, K+ 5.9, Ca2+ 3.4, Mg2+ 1.2, Cl- 127.1, POi 1.2, HCO 25 and gassed with
`95 % O2-5 % CO2. Sugars were Analar grade.
`Ethylidene glucose was purified by preparative paper chromatography before use.
`Benzylidene glucose was prepared for us by D. A. Basketter according to the
`method followed by Novak & Lefevre (1974).
`Sugar-free Krebs solution (5 ml.) was recirculated at the serosal side of the seg-
`ment throughout the experiment, glass dropping chambers in the tube lines provided
`air gaps to maintain the electrical isolation of the serosal fluid.
`In the presence and absence of the actively transported sugars (galactose or
`3-O-methyl glucose), addition of different concentrations of the non-transportable
`sugars or phloridzin was in stepwise increments each for 6 min by which time the
`short-circuit current achieved a steady rate. In some experiments ethylidene glucose
`was present on the serosal side of the segment while actively transported sugar
`(3-O-methyl glucose) solution was on the mucosal side.
`
`200
`
`150
`
`50
`
`0
`0
`
`I.
`
`3 (±0.5) mM
`
`10 mm
`
`I
`
`1
`
`I
`
`1
`
`I
`50
`
`1
`
`I
`
`1
`
`1
`
`1
`100
`
`Time (min)
`
`1
`
`I
`
`1
`
`1
`
`1
`150
`
`Fig. 2. Short circuit (s.c.c.) from everted intestine showing the maintained
`response in the absence of sugar and in the presence of 3-O-methyl glucose
`at 3 and 10 mm. The points and lines are the means and s.E. of four
`experiments.
`
`RESULTS
`
`Control experiments
`The use of the supporting cannula for the everted sac of small intestine
`was found to make the responses of the tissue more reproducible and the
`short-circuit current was stable for from 2-3 hr.
`Fig. 2 summarizes the results of four experiments in which a basal level
`of short-circuit current was followed for 40 min and then two increments
`of current induced by 3 and 10 MK 3-0-methyl glucose respectively were
`followed, the whole experiment lasting 2i hr.
`
`

`

`SUGAR INHIBITORS OF SHORT-CIRCUIT CURRENT 105
`In the presence of metabolizable sugar such as glucose the preparation
`also showed good recovery properties from the depressive effects of
`anoxia, provided this only produced a partial depression of short-circuit
`current. Table 1 summarizes three experiments where a period of anoxia
`was given at 50 and 150 min from the start of the experiment.
`Even after 150 min the restoration of oxygenation fully restored the
`short-circuit current induced by 4.4 mm glucose and there was no reason to
`fear that oxygenation of the tissue may have deteriorated over the course
`of an experiment in which full oxygenation was continuously maintained.
`
`TABLE 1. The recovery characteristics of the intestinal short-circuit current in-
`duced by 4.4 mm glucose in a preparation subjected to periods of anoxia
`The first and second anoxic periods were started at about 50 and 150 min respec-
`tively from setting up the segment. Means and S.E. of three experiments are given.
`
`Experiment
`
`Gas used to
`aerate the
`medium
`
`1. Initial steady state
`2. First anoxic period
`Recovery
`3. Second anoxic period
`Recovery
`
`95 % Os 5 % CO,
`95 % N2-5 % CO,
`95 % O,-5% CO,
`95% 1•1"2-5 % CO,
`95% O2-5 % CO,
`
`Duration
`(min)
`
`15
`14-17
`10-15
`15
`10
`
`(µA)
`
`128 + 14
`64 + 12
`134 ± 22
`67 + 12
`148 ± 30
`
`Competitive experiments
`In the competitive experiments an increment in short-circuit current
`was first induced by a transportable sugar (galactose or 3-O-methyl
`glucose) at submaximal concentration; then stepwise additions of the in-
`hibitory sugar were made while keeping the concentration of the transport-
`able sugar constant throughout.
`Figs. 3A and 4A show the graded decrease in short-circuit current
`brought about by increasing concentrations of ethylidene glucose and
`benzylidene glucose respectively.
`The relationship in both cases is hyperbolic and similar except that
`benzylidene glucose is effective at lower concentrations than ethylidene
`glucose. In experiments in which 14.7 mm ethylidene glucose was placed
`on the serosal side of the segment, only a small statistically insignificant
`reduction in short-circuit current was observed.
`Figs. 5A and 6A show similar graded reductions in short-circuit
`current produced by mannose and lactose as the inhibitory sugars.
`
`Inhibition of basal short-circuit current
`In addition to producing graded reductions in the short-circuit current
`induced by a transportable sugar the same inhibitory sugars were found to
`I2-2
`
`

`

`106
`
`I. W. MUFLIH AND W. F. WIDDAS
`5 5 mm galactose
`
`80
`
`A
`
`40
`
`el
`
`Basal
`s.c.c.
`
`-40
`
`i
`
`15
`10
`5
`[Ethylidene glucose] (mm)
`
`20
`
`V
`LA
`-**1
`
`—80
`Fig. 3. Effect of ethylidene glucose on the short-circuit current of everted
`rat intestine. (A), means of two experiments showing inhibition of
`induced by 5.5 mm galactose. (B), means of two experiments inhibiting the
`basal short-circuit current. I = 0 represents the steady-state current
`after about 45 min in sugar-free Krebs solution.
`
`12 mm 3-0-methyl-glucose
`
`1
`
`4
`3
`2
`[Benzylidene glucose] (mm)
`
`5
`
`100
`
`80
`
`60
`
`40
`
`20
`
`L.;
`
`A
`
`0
`
`Basal f
`s.c.c.
`
`—20
`
`—40
`
`B
`
`Fig. 4. Effect of benzylidene glucose on the short-circuit current of everted
`rat intestine. Means of two experiments: (A) in competition with 12 mm
`3-O-methyl glucose, (B) showing inhibition of the basal short-circuit current.
`= 0 represents the steady current after about 45 min in sugar-free
`Krebs solution.
`
`

`

`SUGAR INHIBITORS OF SHORT-CIRCUIT CURRENT 107
`
`6.6 mm galactose
`
`20
`15
`10
`[Mannose] (mm )
`
`25
`
`30
`
`35
`
`100
`
`50
`
`0
`Basal /
`s.c.c.
`
`—50
`
`A
`
`5
`
`U
`- —100
`
`B
`
`—150
`
`Fig. 5. Effect of mannose on the short-circuit current of everted rat intes-
`tine. Means of two experiments (A) in competition with 6.6 ram galactose,
`= 0 repre-
`(B) showing inhibition of the basal short-circuit current.
`sents the steady current after about 45 min in sugar-free Krebs solution.
`
`4.4 m m galactose
`
`5
`
`10
`15
`[Lactose] (m m )
`
`20
`
`25
`
`• 60
`
`40
`
`Le;
`
`20
`
`0
`
`Basal
`s.c.c.
`
`U —20
`
`—40
`
`A
`
`B
`
`Fig. 6. Effect of lactose on the short-circuit current of everted rat intestine.
`Means of two experiments (A) in competition with 4.4 mm galactose, (B)
`showing inhibition of the basal short-circuit current. I,. = 0 represents the
`steady current after about 45 min in sugar-free Krebs solution.
`
`

`

`I. W. MUFLIH AND W. F. WIDDAS
`108
`produce a graded lowering of the basal short-circuit current when added
`to the mucosal bathing fluid in the absence of a transportable sugar. In all
`cases the preparation was left to equilibrate in sugar-free Krebs solution
`for at least 45 min and the short-circuit current had settled down to a
`steady state which was arbitrarily taken as the zero from which experi-
`mentally induced changes occurred.
`Figs. 3B, 4B, 5B and 6B show the reductions in basal short-circuit
`current produced by the same sugars.
`All curves are hyperbolic and if it is assumed that the change in short-
`circuit current is brought about by the occupancy of sites by the inhibitor
`sugar we may write
`
`C
`— ""z. C+KI'
`
`(1)
`
`where A/i,c is the change in short-circuit current, C is the concentration of
`inhibitory sugar, K1 its half-saturation concentration and k a constant.
`This can be linearized as
`
`C1/1„c = -k (C+Ki)
`
`(2)
`
`and a plot of C/A/,c vs. C should give a straight line. This is the equivalent
`of a Hanes (1932) plot and is recommended by Riggs (1972) as more suit-
`able for use when fitting a line to the experimental points by a least-
`squares analysis. The intercept on the abscissa is — ICI, the half-saturation
`concentration of the inhibitory sugar. The same plot can be used for the
`decrements in the short-circuit current in the competitive inhibition type
`of experiments but in this case the intercept would be — K1[I + (S/KM)],
`where S is the concentration of transportable sugar and KM its half-
`saturation concentration. At the low concentrations of transportable sugars
`used, the term in brackets will be of the order 1.5, but estimates of the
`true K1 can be made by dividing the intercept by [1 +(SIKm)].
`In Fig. 7 the above plot has been applied to the data for benzylidene
`glucose both when inhibiting the basal short-circuit current and when
`inhibiting the short-circuit current induced by 3-0-methyl glucose. The
`results from this plot and similar plots for the other sugars yield rough
`values for the half-saturation constants which are collected in Table 2.
`The inhibitory effects of lactose are in contrast with the stimulatory
`effects seen with the disaccharides, maltose and sucrose. However, the
`intestine of adult rats is known to lack a fl-disaccharidase (Alvarez & Sas,
`1961; Doell & Kretchmer, 1962) and the effects of another ft-disaccharide,
`i.e. cellobiose were therefore examined. It was found that this sugar was
`similar to lactose in inhibiting the basal short-circuit current but showed
`less affinity having a higher half-saturation concentration (K1 A 6.9 mm).
`
`

`

`SUGAR INHIBITORS OF SHORT-CIRCUIT CURRENT 109
`Phloridzin, which classically inhibits the short-circuit current generated
`by actively transported sugar such as 3-0-methyl glucose (Schultz &
`Zalusky, 1964), was also found to inhibit the basal short-circuit current
`and results of two experiments with this drug are shown in Fig. 8. Although
`not truly hyperbolic (there may have been non-specific uptake and de-
`pression of the effective bath concentrations at the lowest concentrations)
`
`[Benzylidene glucose] (mM)
`
`—2
`
`0
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`12 mm 3-0-methyl glucose
`
`Basal S.C.C.
`
`-150
`
`Fig. 7. Linearized plot of results for benzylidene glucose experiment shown
`in Fig. 4. Lines were obtained by a least-squares regression analysis.
`Intercept on the abscissa gives the K, for inhibition of the basal I. but
`not for the competitive experiment (see text).
`
`TABLE 2. Inhibitory constants (Kis) of non-transportable sugars or derivatives in
`competition with transportable sugars and when inhibiting the basal current. Data
`obtained from Hanes plots as in Fig. 7. For competition experiments K,= intercept
`(1 +S/Ku), where S is the concentration of transportable sugar and KM its half-
`saturation constant (for galactose KM = 12.5 mm for 3-O-methyl glucose Km =
`19.1 mM, Muflih, 1975)
`
`Competitive inhibition
`
`Inhibitor
`
`Transported sugar
`
`K, (mm)
`
`Ethylidene glucose
`Benzylidene glucose
`Mannose
`Lactose
`Phloridzin
`
`Galactose (5.5 mM)
`3-O-methyl glucose (12 mM)
`Galactose (6.6 mm)
`Galactose (4.4 mm)
`
`7.2
`1.0
`11
`3.8
`
`Basal
`inhibition:
`K, (mm)
`
`6.7
`1.2
`10
`4.9
`39 x 10-3
`
`

`

`I. W. MUFLIH AND W. F. WIDDAS
`110
`there is evidence of saturation at higher concentrations and the value of
`current maximally inhibited is of the same order as that with the non-
`transportable sugars.
`
`[Phloridzin] (pM)
`40
`60
`
`20
`
`80
`
`100
`
`Basal„,„0 0
`s.c.c.
`
`—10
`
`-20
`
`3 -30
`1)
`
`-40
`
`-50
`
`-60
`
`-70
`
`Fig. 8. Effect of phloridzin on the basal short-circuit current of everted rat
`intestine. Two experiments were carried out;
`= 0 represents the basal
`steady current after about 45 min in a sugar-free medium.
`
`DISCUSSION
`The experiments described in this study necessarily took a considerable
`time; not only was it necessary to allow 6 min for the short-circuit current
`to reach a steady state at each sugar concentration but to attain the basal
`level in sugar-free Krebs solution required an initial settling down period
`of from 45 min to 1 hr usually with at least one change of sugar-free
`medium.
`The everted gut supported by the perforated rigid cannula proved to be
`stable and to give consistent short-circuit current changes for up to 3 hr.
`The reason for the improved stability has not been investigated in detail
`but it was observed that muscular movements (seen in freely hanging
`preparations) were absent and the slight distension of the sac may have
`ensured more uniform oxygenation. The cannula also holds the sac so that
`its position relative to internal and external electrodes does not change
`during an experiment.
`Thus the preparation appeared to avoid oxygenation difficulties such
`as observed by Munk (1972) in everted rat intestine and the interference
`due to muscular contractions observed in everted segments of hamster
`intestine by Baker, Lo & Nunn (1974).
`
`

`

`SUGAR INHIBITORS OF SHORT-CIRCUIT CURRENT 111
`Apart from the studies of Quay & Armstrong (1969) with bull frog
`intestine and those of Field et al. (1971) with strips of rabbit ileum, previous
`investigators have usually failed to obtain comparable stability for a
`sufficient length of time to complete such experiments.
`In competitive experiments it was possible to study the changes in short-
`circuit current produced by varying concentrations of non-transportable
`sugars (ethylideneg lucose, benzylidene glucose, mannose and lactose)
`in the presence of constant concentrations of the actively trans-
`ported sugars (galactose or 3-0-methyl glucose). The non-transportable
`sugars all had inhibitory effects in that they produced decrements in the
`short-circuit current. Further, these decrements were graded with con-
`centration in a manner suggesting saturation at high concentration. The
`action was assumed to be a membrane one, whereby the inhibitory sugar
`combined with sites on the active sugar transforming mechanism but in
`such a way that translocation was impossible. The increments in short-
`circuit current which accompanied the translocation of the actively trans-
`ported sugar (which was displaced) were therefore progressively reduced.
`That the action was at the outer membrane was suggested by the fact
`that onset of the inhibitory effect developed without delay when the sugar
`was in the mucosal fluid. Ethylidene glucose on the serosal surface had no
`significant inhibitory effect. Lactose was unlikely to penetrate by diffusion
`through intact mucosa and, if it had been hydrolysed, both the sugars
`formed as products of hydrolysis would have stimulated the short-circuit
`current. However, the absence of a fl-glycosidase enzyme (necessary for
`lactose hydrolysis) from the adult rat intestine reported by Alvarez & Sas
`(1961) has been fully confirmed by Doell & Kretchmer (1962), Koldovsky
`& Chytil (1965), and Semenza (1968). Thus the effect of lactose was most
`likely to be exerted extracellularly and this supports the view that the site
`of action was the outer membrane of the absorptive surface in the micro-
`villi of the mucosal cells.
`Lactose and cellobiose, the two fl-glycosides used, were both inhibitory
`whereas maltose and sucrose produced increases in short-circuit current
`(Muflih, 1975).
`An interesting observation of the present study was the inhibitory
`effects of these non-transportable sugars on the short-circuit current
`recorded across the intestine in Krebs solution which was free of trans-
`portable sugar. In these experiments as in the competitive ones, the decre-
`ments obtained in the short-circuit current by the addition of any one of
`the non-transportable sugars were concentration dependent in a manner
`suggesting a saturable effect. The Kis obtained for inhibiting the basal
`short-circuit current were siTilar to those obtained in inhibiting the short-
`circuit current generated by the transported sugars. This finding may
`
`

`

`112
`I. W. MUFLIH AND W. F. WIDDAS
`suggest that reactions were occurring either at the same sites or at sites
`with similar affinities. However, there may be a difference between those
`sugars like mannose which lack the stereo-specificity at carbon atom 2
`and the other non-transportable sugars, ethylidene glucose, benzylidene
`glucose, lactose and cellobiose which have bulky groups at the opposite
`end of the glucose molecule. Indeed phloridzin may belong to this group
`since Newey, Sanford, Smyth & Williams (1963) have suggested that the
`hexosyl unit of the phloridzin plays an important part in the binding of
`this inhibitor.
`In summary, competition for a sugar binding site but without transloca-
`tion is probably the common feature relating to these non-transportable
`sugars in their reactions with the intestinal mucosa. The corollary to
`this view would be the hypothesis that at least part of the in vitro basal
`short-circuit current of the everted gut bathed in sugar-free medium was
`actually being carried (presumably without sugar) on the sugar trans-
`porting system. This would not be inconsistent with the hypothesis of a
`sodium-linked sugar carrier in accordance with Bihler (1965), Crane,
`Forstner & Eichholz (1965), Lyon & Crane (1966) and Goldner, Schultz &
`Curran (1969) but may not exclude some other form of coupling.
`The absence of the actively transported sugar in the medium does not
`exclude the possibility of a small leakage of intracellular sugar into the
`microvillal crypts and reabsorption with Na+ on the transporting system,
`but this explanation would appear to be unlikely. Nevertheless the basal
`short-circuit current's relation to the sugar transporting system may be
`peculiar to the in vitro preparation.
`It was observed that the further depression of the basal short-circuit
`current was greatest with saturating concentrations of mannose, inter-
`mediate with ethylidene glucose and smallest with benzylidene glucose
`and lactose. The reasons for this were not clear but may reflect different
`accessibility of the transport sites since the sizes of the sugars would fall
`in a similar order. Barry et al. (1969) considered that osmotic effects were
`involved in the depression of the potential difference by mannose (at 28
`mm) and the inhibitions by this sugar only saturate at such levels of con-
`centration. However, osmotic effects can only play a minor part since the
`inhibitions by benzylidene glucose and phloridzin are produced by osmoti-
`cally insignificant concentrations.
`During this work I.W.M. was supported by grants from the Calouste Gulbenkian
`Foundation and the University of Baghdad which are gratefully acknowledged. We
`are grateful to Mr D. A. Basketter, &Se., for the synthesis of benzylidene glucose
`and for purifying the ethylidene glucose.
`
`

`

`SUGAR INHIBITORS OF SHORT-CIRCUIT CURRENT 113
`
`REFERENCES
`
`ALVAREZ, A. & SAS, J. (1961). fl-Galactosidase changes in the developing intestinal
`tract of the rat. Nature, Lond. 190, 826-827.
`AsANo, T. (1964). Metabolic disturbances and short-circuit current across intestinal
`wall of rat. Am. J. Physiol. 207, 415-422.
`BAKER, R. D., Lo, C. S. & NuNN, A. S. (1974). Galactose fluxes across brush border
`of hamster jejunal epithelium. J. Membrane Biol. 19, 55-78.
`BAKER, G. F. & WIDEAs, W. F. (1973). The permeation of human red cells by
`4,6-O-ethylidene-cx-E-glucopyranose (ethylidene glucose). J. Physiol. 231, 129-142.
`BARRY, R. J. C., DIKSTEIN, S., MATTHEWS, J. & SMYTH, D. H. (1961). Electric
`potentials in the isolated intestine. J. Physiol. 155, 17-18P.
`BARRY, R. J. C., EGOENTON, J. & SMYTH, D. H. (1969). Sodium pumps in the rat
`small intestine in relation to hexose transfer and metabolism. J. Physiol. 204,
`299-310.
`BARRY, R. J. C., SMYTH, D. H. & WR1Gurr, E. M. (1965). Short-circuit current and
`solute transfer by rat jejunum. J. Physiol. 181, 410-431.
`BIIILER, I. (1965). Apparently passive sugar transport in the small intestine. Fedn
`Proc. 24, 715.
`CEARKsoN, T. W., Cnoss, A. C. & TooL, S. (1961). Dependence on substrate of the
`electrical potential across the isolated gut. Nature, Lond. 191, 501-502.
`CRANE, R. K. (1960). Intestinal absorption of sugars. Physiol. Rev. 40, 789-825.
`CRANE, R. K., FoRsYNER, G. & MemHolz, A. (1965). Studies on the mechanism of
`the intestinal absorption of sugars. X. An effect of Nal- concentration on the
`apparent Michaelis constants for intestinal sugar transport, in vitro. Biochim.
`biophys. Acta 109, 467-477.
`CRANE, R. K., MILLER, D. & Brnr.rE, I. (1961). The restrictions on possible mecha-
`nisms of intestinal active transport of sugars. In Membrane Transport and Meta-
`bolism, ed. KLEINZELLER, A. & KOTYK, A., pp. 439-449. New York: Academic
`Press.
`DOELL, R. G. & KRETCHMER, N. (1962). Studies of small intestine during develop-
`ment. I. Distribution and activity of fl-galactosidase. Biochim. biophys. Acta 62,
`353-362.
`FIELD, M., FROMM, D. & McCoix, T. (1971). Ion transport in rabbit ileal mucosa.
`I. Na and Cl fluxes and short-circuit current. Am. J. Physiol. 220, 1388-1396.
`GOLDNER, A. M., Scircrtam, S. G. & CURRAN, P. F. (1969). Sodium and sugar fluxes
`across the mucosal border of rabbit ileum. J. gen. Physiol. 53, 362-383.
`HANES, C. S. (1932). Studies on plant amylases. I. The effect of starch concentration
`upon the velocity of hydrolysis by the amylase of germinated barley. Biochem. J.
`26, 1406-1421.
`KOLDOVSKV, O. & CHYTIL, F. (1965). Postnatal development of fl-galactosidase
`activity in the small intestine of the rat. Effect of adrenalectomy and diet.
`Biochem. J. 94, 266-270.
`KREBS, H. A. & HENSELEIT, K. (1932). Untersuchungen caber die Harnstoffbildung
`im Tierkorper. Hoppe-Seyler's Z. physiol. Chem. 210, 33-66.
`LYON, I. & CRANE, R. K. (1966). Studies on transmural potentials, in vitro, in rela-
`tion to intestinal absorption. 1. Apparent Michaelis constants for Na+-dependent
`sugar transport. Biochim. biophys. Acta 112, 278-291.
`MUFLIH, I. W. (1975). Some in vitro studies of changes in short-circuit current of the
`rat small intestine induced by sugars. Ph.D. Thesis, London University.
`MUFLIH, I. W. & WIDDAS, W. F. (1976). The effects of non-transportable competitive
`inhibitors of sugar transfer on the short-circuit current of the rat everted small
`intestine. J. Physiol. 254, 50-51P.
`
`

`

`114
`
`I. W. MUFLIII AND W. F. WIDDAS
`Mtrifx, B. G. (1972). Effects of sugar and amino acid transport on transepithelial
`flux of sodium and chloride of short circuited rat jejunum. J. Physiol. 223, 699-
`717.
`NEWSY, H., SANFORD, P. A., &rpm, D. H. dr. Wrtaaams, A H (1963). The effect
`of some analogues of phloridzin on intestinal hexose and fluid transfer. J. Physiol.
`169, 229-236.
`Novel, R. A. & LEFEVBE, P. G. (1974). Interaction of the sugar metals with the
`human erythrocyte glucose transport system. J. Membrane Biol. 17, 383-390.
`QUAY, J. F. & ARMSTRONG, W. McD. (1969). Sodium and chloride transport by
`isolated bullfrog small intestine. Am. J. Physiol. 217, 694-702.
`RIGGS, D. S. (1972). The Mathematical Approach to Physiological Problems, pp.
`272-298. Cambridge, Mass.: M.I.T. Press.
`SCHULTZ, S. G. & ZALUSKY, R. (1963a). Transmural potential difference, short-
`circuit current and sodium transport in isolated rabbit ileum. Nature, Lend. 198,
`894-895.
`ScHumz, S. G. & ZALUSKY, R. (1963b). The interaction between active sodium
`transport and active sugar transport in the isolated rabbit ileum. Biochim.
`biophys. Acta 71,503-505.
`Scamm, S. G. & ZALUSKY, R. (1964). Ion transport in isolated rabbit ileum. II.
`The interaction between active sodium and active sugar transport. J. gen. Physiol.
`47, 1043-1059.
`SEMENZA, G. (1968). Intestinal oligosaccharidases and disaccharidases. In Handbook
`of Physiology, section 6: Alimentary Canal, vol. v, pp. 2543-2566. Washington,
`D.C. : American Physiological Society.
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket