throbber
Escherichia coli enterotoxin receptors:
`localization in opossum kidney, intestine, and testis
`
`LEONARD R. FORTE, WILLIAM J. KRAUSE, AND RONALD H. FREEMAN
`Departments of Pharmacology, Anatomy, and Physiology, School of Medicine, University of Missouri,
`and Harry S. Truman Memorial Veterans Administration Medical Center, Columbia, Missouri 65212
`
`FORTE, LEONARD R., WILLIAM J. KRAUSE, AND RONALD H.
`FREEMAN. Escherichia coli enterotoxin receptors: localization in
`opossum kidney, intestine, and testis. Am. J. Physiol. 257 (Renal
`Fluid Electrolyte Physiol. 26): F874-F881, 1989.—The distri-
`bution of receptors for Escherichia coli enterotoxin were ex-
`amined in opossum kidney, intestine, and testis. E. coli enter-
`otoxin stimulated guanosine 3',5'-cyclic monophosphate
`(cGMP) production in renal cortex, testis, and small intestinal
`mucosa but had only a small effect in the colon. Atrial natri-
`uretic factor enhanced the cGMP content of renal cortex and
`small intestine but had no effect on testis or colon. The enter-
`otoxin receptors were observed to be localized in proximal
`tubules, to epithelial cells of crypts and villi of small intestine,
`to crypts of colon, and in seminiferous tubules. Both convoluted
`and straight portions of proximal tubules exhibited specific
`binding sites for 1"I-labeled enterotoxin. Glomeruli and distal
`tubules did not have receptors. Binding of '25I-enterotoxin to
`brush-border membranes of kidney cortex or intestinal mucosa
`and to testis membranes was markedly temperature dependent.
`The binding affinities of these receptors for E. coli enterotoxin
`were similar (i.e., IC50 = 0.4-0.5 nM). Daily administration of
`20 µg of enterotoxin intramuscularly to opossums increased
`urine cGMP excretion with no apparent changes in urine
`volume, Na+, or 1{± excretion. Thus receptors for heat-stable
`enterotoxins are localized to proximal tubules of kidney and to
`enterocytes and seminiferous tubules of intestine and testis,
`respectively. Apical membranes may be the site of enterotoxin
`receptors in these epithelia.
`
`guanosine 3',5'-cyclic monophosphate; receptor autoradiogra-
`phy; atrial natriuretic factor; brush-border membranes
`
`HEAT-STABLE PEPTIDES belonging to a class of diarrheal
`enterotoxins are produced by Escherichia coli, Yersinia
`enterocolitica, and other pathogenic enteric bacteria (13).
`Specific, high-affinity binding sites for these peptides are
`found on the apical membrane of intestinal epithelial
`cells (8, 9, 12, 14, 17, 23). These enterotoxins activate a
`membrane-bound form of guanylate cyclase, which leads
`to an increase in guanosine 3',5'-cyclic monophosphate
`(cGMP) content of enterocytes (8-10, 18-20, 28, 29).
`Analogues of cGMP cause changes in the transport of
`solute and water in the intestine similar to the effects of
`bacterial enterotoxins (10, 16, 20, 29). Thus the secretory
`diarrhea caused by this class of heat-stable (ST) enter-
`otoxins has been postulated to be mediated by the intra-
`cellular second messenger, cGMP (10). This cellular
`mechanism may be analogous to the form of transmem-
`brane signaling observed for hormones and neurotrans-
`
`secretion in the intestine and
`mitters, which promote
`in cultured intestinal cell lines via activation of adenylate
`cyclase (3, 6, 7, 26, 30, 32). E. coli enterotoxin also
`secretion in cultured T-84
`stimulated transepithelial
`cells, a human colon carcinoma cell line having receptors
`for the enterotoxin linked positively to the activation of
`guanylate cyclase (18, 21).
`The biological actions of ST enterotoxins were consid-
`ered to be restricted to the enterocytes of small or large
`intestine which expressed apical membrane receptors for
`these peptides (8, 19, 28). However, we reported recently
`that opossum kidney (OK), as well as cultured kidney
`cell lines (PtK-2) had specific, high-affinity binding sites
`for 'I -labeled enterotoxin (11). Moreover, E. coli enter-
`otoxin elicited large increases in kidney or intestinal
`cGMP production in vitro. Intravenous injection of E.
`coli enterotoxin caused 10- to 50-fold increases in urinary
`cGMP excretion in this species. Thus renal receptors for
`the E. coli enterotoxin and an associated guanylate cy-
`clase were present in the kidney and these receptors were
`activated by systemic administration of the enterotoxin.
`Therefore, ST enterotoxin receptors are more widely
`distributed in epithelial tissues than was previously con-
`sidered. In the present study we report that specific
`receptors for E. coli enterotoxin, which are positively
`coupled to guanylate cyclase, appear to be localized to
`the proximal tubule in the renal cortex of the North
`American opossum (Didelphis virginiana). Enterotoxin
`receptors were also localized to the enterocytes of both
`crypts and villi of small intestine, crypts of large intes-
`tine, and to seminiferous tubules of testis. Brush-border
`membranes prepared from renal cortex or small intes-
`tinal mucosa had high-affinity binding sites for 125I-
`enterotoxin.
`
`EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURE
`
`Animals. Opossums were trapped locally using Hava-
`hart traps (Tomahawk Live Trap, Tomahawk, WI) under
`a permit from the Missouri Department of Conservation
`issued to W. J. Krause. Animals of both sexes were
`housed in the Laboratory Animal Medicine Facility of
`the School of Medicine. They were fed Purina dog chow
`(Ralston Purina, St. Louis, MO) and provided with water
`ad libitum. The animals appeared to be in good health
`when used in the experiments. Animals were killed by
`an overdose of ketamine administered intracardially fol-
`lowed by exsanguination.
`
`MYLAN EXHIBIT - 1034
`Mylan Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Bausch Health Ireland, Ltd. - IPR2022-00722
`
`

`

`E. COLI ENTEROTOXIN RECEPTORS
`
`F875
`
`Tissue cGMP measurements. Opossum tissues were
`dissected free and placed into ice-cold 0.9% NaCl. Tissue
`slices were prepared with a Stadie-Riggs microtome and
`placed
`into Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium
`(DMEM) containing 20 mM N-2-hydroxyethylpipera-
`zine-N' -2-ethanesulfonic acid (HEPES) buffer, pH 7.4
`at 4°C until incubated with agonists (11). Tissue slices
`or intestinal mucosa (usually 125-150 mg wet wt) were
`incubated for 40 min at 37°C with E. coli enterotoxin-
`STa (Sigma Chemical, St. Louis, MO), atrial natriuretic
`factor (ANF, Peninsula Laboratories, Belmont, CA), or
`vehicle that was added to DMEM-HEPES (0.2 ml) plus
`1 mM methylisobutylxanthine (MIX). Perchloric acid
`was then added to a final concentration of 3.3%, slices
`homogenized, centrifuged, and the supernatants neutral-
`ized with 10 N KOH. After centrifugation the superna-
`tant solution was used to measure cGMP by radio-
`immunoassay (11). Mucosal cGMP content in small in-
`testine and colon was expressed per milligram protein
`(25).
`Iodination of the E. coli enterotoxin. Iodination of E.
`coli enterotoxin with 1251 was accomplished by means of
`lactoperoxidase as described by the manufacturer (En-
`zymobeads, Bio-Rad Laboratories, Richmond, CA). 125I-
`enterotoxin was purified by use of reverse-phase high-
`performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) with a C18
`column (3.9 mm x 30 cm µBondapak, Waters, Milford,
`MA). The peak of radioligand used in these experiments
`was that which corresponded to peak B of the HPLC
`purification method described by Thompson et al. (31).
`No detectable free 125I was observed in this peak from
`the linear gradient of acetonitrile. We routinely used the
`fraction of 1-25I-enterotoxin that provided the least
`amount of nonspecific binding in relation to total binding
`of the radioligand by intestinal brush-border membranes.
`Preparation of membranes from kidney, intestine, and
`testis. Testes from each opossum were homogenized for
`35 s in 3 ml/g tissue of a solution containing 0.25 M
`sucrose, 0.01 M
`tris(hydroxymethyl)aminomethane
`(Tris) • HC1, pH 7.4, 1 mM EDTA by means of a Tissum-
`izer (Tekmar, Cincinnati, OH). The homogenate was
`centrifuged at 43,500 g for 15 min and the pellet was
`resuspended in the same buffer. Membranes were stored
`frozen at —70°C. Brush-border membranes from opos-
`sum kidney cortex and small intestinal mucosa were
`prepared with the use of the magnesium precipitation
`technique described by Biber et al. (2). Kidney and
`intestinal brush-border membranes were stored frozen
`at —70°C in a solution containing 20% glycerol, 300 mM
`mannitol, 1 mM MgC12, 50 mM HEPES-Tris, pH 7.5.
`Radioligand binding experiments. Kidney or intestinal
`brush-border membranes were thawed, sedimented by
`centrifugation at 30,900 g for 30 mM, and then resus-
`pended in a buffer containing 50 mM Tris • HC1, pH 7.5,
`0.1 mM EDTA, 150 mM NaCl. Kidney (20 µg), intestine
`(10 µg), or testis (150 µg) membranes were incubated in
`this buffer containing either 30,000 counts per minute
`(cpm; for kidney and intestine membranes) or 100,000
`cpm (for testis membranes) of 125I-enterotoxin in the
`presence of a range of concentrations of unlabeled enter-
`otoxin from 10 pM to 1µM. Incubation times and tem-
`
`peratures are given in the appropriate figure legends. At
`the end of the incubation, 2 ml of ice-cold calcium,
`magnesium-free phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) was
`added to each tube. This suspension was filtered by 25
`mm diameter glass microfiber filters (GF/F, Whatman
`International, Maidstone, England). The filters had been
`pretreated with 0.1% polyethylenimine (Sigma Chemi-
`cal) before use. The filters were washed three times with
`4 ml each of cold wash solution. Radioactivity was meas-
`ured by gamma scintillation spectrometry.
`In vivo autoradiography of ' 25I-enterotoxin distribution
`in kidney. A 150-g male opossum was anesthetized with
`ketamine and then injected with 30 x 106 cpm of 1251-ST
`intravenously. Ten minutes later, a time when peak urine
`cGMP responses to E. coli ST were previously observed
`(9), the animal was exsanguinated and perfused via the
`ventricle with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) until all
`blood was removed from the animal. Kidneys were then
`frozen in liquid N2. Frozen sections (14 µm) were cut at
`—20°C and thaw-mounted on cover slips. After air-drying
`the sections were placed on X-ray film and exposed for
`3 mo.
`In vitro autoradiography of 1251-enterotoxin binding to
`kidney, small intestine, colon, and testis. Opossum tissues
`were frozen in N2, and 14-µm sections were cut in a
`cryostat maintained at —20°C. Sections were thaw-
`mounted onto gelatin-coated slides and air-dried.
`Mounted sections were stored at —70°C until used. Each
`section was incubated with 50 µI of DMEM-2-(N-mor-
`pholino)ethanesulfonic acid (MES), pH 5.5, containing
`0.5% bovine serum albumin (BSA) for 15 min at 37°C.
`Then 50 µl of DMEM-MES containing 500-2,000 cpm/
`µl of 19-enterotoxin ± 1µM unlabeled enterotoxin and
`0.5% BSA were added to measure total and nonspecific
`binding of this peptide to the tissue sections. The sec-
`tions were incubated for 15 min at 37°C, washed with a
`gentle stream of ice-cold PBS, and then washed 3 times
`in 50 ml of ice-cold PBS for 5 mM at each wash. Sections
`were air-dried and placed into contact with Kodak X-
`Omat AR X-ray film (Eastman Kodak, Rochester, NY)
`for detection of radioactivity. The slides were then coated
`with Kodak NTB-2 emulsion, sealed in light-tight boxes,
`and stored at 4°C for 3-5 wk until developed.
`Chronic treatment of opossums with E. coli enterotoxin.
`Five opossums raised in our colony (7 mo of age, 1.5-2.0
`kg body wt) were placed into metabolism cages for at
`least 1 wk to allow the animals to become accustomed to
`the new housing conditions. Then 24-h urine samples
`were collected for 7-10 days comprising a control period.
`Each animal received 20 µg of E. coli enterotoxin by
`intramuscular injection per day for three consecutive
`days. Urine was also collected for several days after
`treatment was discontinued. Urine cGMP was measured
`by radioimmunoassay and Na+ and IC+ by flame photom-
`etry.
`Statistical analysis. The data were analyzed for differ-
`ences in tissue cGMP content between control and en-
`terotoxin- or ANF-stimulated values by Student's paired
`t test.
`Materials. Tissue culture medium (DMEM) was pur-
`chased from GIBCO Laboratories (Grand Island, NY).
`
`

`

`F876
`
`E. COLT ENTEROTOXIN
`
`RECEPTORS
`
`Na "'I was supplied by Amersham, 14-17 peCi/µg (Ar-
`lington Heights, IL). Other chemicals and reagents were
`purchased from various suppliers.
`
`RESULTS
`Opossum tissues were examined for the presence of E.
`coli enterotoxin-stimulated guanylate cyclase activity by
`measuring cGMP levels of either tissue slices or intes-
`tinal mucosa suspensions exposed to vehicle, entero-
`
`TABLE 1. Effect of E. coli enterotoxin and ANF
`on cGMP levels of opossum kidney, testis,
`and intestine in vitro
`
`cGMP, fmolimg
`
`Tissue
`
`Basal
`
`Enterotoxin
`
`ANF
`56+9*
`Kidney cortex (11)
`446±128*
`34±11
`17±4
`Testis (6)
`30±9
`79±20*
`398±77
`Small intestine (4)
`3,842±1,177*
`887±213*
`Colon (5)
`2,183±1,657
`1,764±914 2,436±1,654
`Values are means ± SE; number of experiments in parentheses. E.
`colt enterotoxin concentration; kidney and small intestine 0.5 µM;
`other tissues 1 µM; atrial natriuretic factor (ANF) concentration was
`0.1 AM. Guanosine 3',5'-cyclic monophosphate (cGMP) content is
`expressed as fmol/mg wet wt for kidney and testis, and fmol/mg protein
`for small intestine and colon mucosa. * P < 0.05 compared with basal,
`Student's paired t test.
`
`FIG. 1. Localization of 19-enterotoxin in kidney after in vivo ad-
`ministration of peptide to an opossum. See EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURE
`for details of experiment.
`
`toxin, or ANF. Under these conditions E. coli enterotoxin
`elicited a 4.6-fold increase in cGMP content of testis
`(Table 1). Colon did not respond to the enterotoxin with
`a significant increase in cGMP, although cGMP levels
`were generally higher in tissues exposed to that peptide.
`The effect of E. coli enterotoxin on renal cortical and
`small intestinal mucosa cGMP content (i.e., 13-fold and
`10-fold, respectively) was substantially greater than the
`cGMP response of testis. ANF increased the cGMP
`content of kidney cortex and intestine, but this peptide
`had no apparent effect on cGMP content of testis or
`colon under these conditions.
`In vivo labeling of opossum kidney enterotoxin recep-
`tors was accomplished by injecting the ' 2'1-labeled pep-
`tide into an opossum. The distribution of radioactivity
`was highest in renal cortex, much lower in medulla, and
`intermediate in the renal papilla (Fig. 1). When kidney
`sections were labeled in vitro with 125I-enterotoxin, we
`found that specific binding of this radioligand occurred
`only in the renal cortex (Fig. 2). Radioactivity associated
`with the medulla or papilla was equivalent to nonspecific
`binding of the radioligand (denoted by arrows in Fig. 2).
`In contrast, the testis had a lower apparent binding of
`125I-enterotoxin to receptors, which appeared to be dis-
`tributed evenly throughout the tissue. Small intestine
`and colon were both labeled by 'I-enterotoxin over the
`mucosa. We consistently found that brain (cerebral cor-
`tex) and skeletal muscle had no specific binding of 125I-
`enterotoxin (data not shown).
`Examination of the ' 25I-enterotoxin labeled sections of
`OK by light microscopy revealed that enterotoxin recep-
`tors were localized to the proximal tubule (Fig. 3). The
`pars recta appeared to have a somewhat greater level of
`radioactivity than did the convoluted portion of the
`proximal tubule. Glomeruli and distal tubules did not
`have receptors for this peptide. Also, it appears unlikely
`that enterotoxin receptors occur in either the loop of
`Henle or collecting tubules because there was no specific
`binding of "I-enterotoxin in the inner medulla or pa-
`pilla. Enterotoxin receptors in small and large intestine
`were restricted to the enterocytes of both crypts and villi.
`No receptors were observed in association with submu-
`cosal connective tissue or smooth muscle. The 125I-enter-
`
`FIG. 2. Specific binding of ' 26I-enter-
`°toxin to kidney cortex (A), small intes-
`tine (s), and colonic mucosa (C) and
`testes (D) revealed by in vitro autoradi-
`ography. Data are representative exper-
`iments of at least 6 different experiments
`with frozen sections from these tissues
`(see EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES for
`details). Exposure of X-ray film varied
`from 4 to 16 h and data are intended to
`demonstrate tissue localization and not
`receptor density. Sections of brain (cor-
`tex) and skeletal muscle have consist-
`ently shown no specific binding of 'aI-
`enterotoxin (data not shown).
`
`

`

`E. CM ENTEROTOXIN RECEPTORS
`
`F877
`
`5.
`
`4
`
`I
`
`alitt=" 4.
`
`It;
`
`is, to
`
`,
`
`•
`
`• %V'
`v.% fi5 11 s.
`
`ill. X
`
`C
`
`FIG. 3. A: radioautograph of a nonstained section from proximal small intestine labeled with 'I-enterotoxin
`demonstrates receptor localization on intestinal epithelial cells covering villi (v) and lining intestinal glands (arrows).
`Lumen (L) of intestine is to extreme right. Muscularis externa (E) and connective tissue elements forming submucosa
`and lamina propria are unlabeled. Magnification x20. B: portion of colon labeled with "I-enterotoxin and viewed
`with dark-field microscopy shows intense labeling of intestinal lining epithelium. Magnification x100. C: radioauto-
`graph of a nonstained section taken through full thickness of renal cortex and an adjacent portion of medulla shows
`"I-enterotoxin labeling of tubules in cortex. Medulla (M) is unlabeled. Tubules concentrated near corticomedullary
`junction show more intense labeling (small arrows) and these often follow a straight course perpendicular to surface
`of cortex. Glomeruli (large arrows) are unlabeled. Magnification x20. D: region of testis labeled with "I-enterotoxin
`demonstrates receptor localization primarily in seminiferous tubules. Dark field. Magnification x250.
`
`otoxin receptors were located in the seminiferous tubules
`of the testis. Thus enterotoxin receptors in these tissues
`appeared to be expressed only in the epithelial cells of
`the proximal renal or seminiferous tubules and the in-
`testinal mucosa.
`The receptors for ST enterotoxins have been shown to
`be localized to apical membranes of the intestine (8, 9,
`12, 14, 17, 23). Therefore, we prepared brush-border
`membranes from OK cortex and small intestinal mucosa
`by a magnesium-precipitation technique (2). Total cel-
`lular membranes were prepared from testis. The char-
`acteristics of 125I-enterotoxin binding to these prepara-
`tions were investigated to compare properties of the
`receptors in these tissues. We found that little specific
`
`binding of 125I-enterotoxin to receptors in brush-border
`membranes from kidney (Fig. 4) or intestine (not shown)
`occurred at 4°C relative to the binding observed at 37°C.
`Similar data were obtained with the testis membrane
`preparation (Fig. 4). The binding of 125I-enterotoxin to
`kidney, intestinal, and testicular membranes was inhib-
`ited by unlabeled peptide between 0.01 and 10 nM of
`enterotoxin (Fig. 5). The relative affinities of these recep-
`tor sites for the E. coti enterotoxin were similar under
`these conditions. The IC5c, values for E. coil enterotoxin
`inhibition of 'I-enterotoxin binding to kidney, intes-
`tine, and testis membranes were 0.5 ± 0.09 (n = 4), 0.4
`± 0.2 (n = 3), and 0.4 ± 0.04 nM (n — 3), respectively.
`We previously reported that intravenous administra-
`
`

`

`F878
`
`K COLI ENTEROTOXIN RECEPTORS
`
`•
`
`•
`
`• --___ •
`
`-•
`
`(17
`
`aJ
`
`0
`
`100
`
`90
`
`BO
`
`1200
`
`1000
`
`BOO
`
`600-
`
`400-
`
`POO
`
`cGMP nmol/day
`
`12
`
`10
`
`8
`
`6
`
`4
`
`2
`
`1:1
`
`LLJ
`
`2
`
`4
`
`6
`Days
`
`8
`
`10
`
`FIG. 6. Chronic administration of E. coli enterotoxin to opossum
`increases urine cGMP excretion. Data are means of 5 animals for each
`point. Each animal received 20 µg of E. coli enterotoxin intramuscularly
`as a single injection on days 4, 5, and 6. Peak changes in urine cGMP
`occurred 24 h later at days 5, 6, and 7 of urine collection. u
`• Na+
`excretion, •—• lc+ excretion.
`
`of this peptide (via cGMP) on ion transport in that
`nephron segment could be substantially affected by com-
`pensatory responses of the nephron segments distal to
`the proximal tubule.
`
`DISCUSSION
`
`These experiments revealed that renal receptors for E.
`coli enterotoxin are localized to the proximal tubule,
`presumably in the brush-border membranes of proximal
`tubular epithelial cells. Moreover, receptor autoradiog-
`raphy revealed that ' 25I-enterotoxin labeled the receptor
`sites in epithelial cells of the seminiferous tubules of
`opossum testis. Enterotoxin receptors were localized to
`enterocytes of both crypt and villus regions in the small
`intestine and crypts of the large intestine. Therefore, the
`
`16
`
`12
`
`B
`
`4
`
`0
`
`Testis
`
`Kidney
`
`,.o
`
`---- A
`
`-A -----
`
`-
`
`.
`60
`
`-
`
`-
`
`-
`90
`
`-
`-
`1203
`
`30
`
`----- . , 1
`
`30
`
`60
`
`90
`
`120
`
`Time - minutes
`
`FIG. 4. Time and temperature dependence for binding of 1"I-enter-
`°toxin to testis and kidney membranes. See EXPERIMENTAL PROCE-
`DURE for methods of membrane preparation. Incubations were carried
`out at 37°C •—•, A
`A, or 4°C o
`o, o-
`L. Total binding of
`125I-enterotoxin is illustrated by •
`•, o- - - -o and nonspecific
`binding (with 1µM enterotoxin) by A-A,
`- - -L. Data are means
`± SE of triplicates in a representative experiment. Scale on left axis
`also applies to data in right-hand panel.
`
`•
`I - - -
`
`•
`
`H
`4
`
`4
`
`* Kidney
`0 Intestine
`
`A Testes
`
`9
`
`6
`
`3
`
`a
`
`O
`
`I-
`
`CU
`
`5.2
`
`M
`
`4.7
`
`4.2 c` Cu
`
`3.7 "
`
`3.2
`
`-
`-
`-
`-
`-
`0 —H
`0 12 11 10 9 8 7
`0 12 11 10 9 8 7
`—Log
`rE Coll ST] M
`FIG. 5. Comparison of radioligand binding curves for 125I-entero-
`toxin binding to kidney and intestine brush-border membranes with
`testis membranes. Data are a representative experiment of a minimum
`of 3 binding isotherms carried out with each membrane preparation.
`ST, heat stable.
`
`tion of K coli enterotoxin to the anesthetized opossum
`resulted in a large increase in urine cGMP excretion
`without any change in urinary excretion of H20, Nat,
`Kt, Mg', Ca', and phosphate (11). In contrast,
`ANF elicited a smaller increase in cGMP excretion but
`caused a marked diuresis, natriuresis, and calciuria. In
`the present study we investigated the effects of chronic
`administration of E. coli enterotoxin on renal function.
`Intramuscular injection of 20 µg enterotoxin daily for 3
`days resulted in a marked increase in urine cGMP excre-
`tion in conscious, unrestrained opossums that persisted
`for 1 day after discontinuation of treatment (Fig. 6). The
`peptide did not appear to influence urine Nat, K±, or
`H2O excretion when administered on a daily basis and
`did not produce diarrhea by this route of administration.
`Lack of an effect of the enterotoxin on Na± and H2O
`excretion in this and earlier experiments (11) even
`though a marked stimulation of cGMP excretion oc-
`curred is consistent with the localization of E. coli enter-
`otoxin receptors to the proximal tubule. Putative effects
`
`

`

`E. COLI ENTEROTOXIN RECEPTORS
`
`F879
`
`conclusion can be made that the enterotoxin receptor
`protein may be broadly expressed in several different
`epithelial cells of the opossum. The enterotoxin stimu-
`lates chloride secretion and also inhibits salt absorption
`in the intestine (6, 10, 13, 16, 29). These effects, which
`are the apparent cause of "traveler's diarrhea" can be
`reproduced by cGMP analogues in experimental systems
`(20). If the apical membrane receptor for ST enterotoxins
`is broadly expressed in epithelia, perhaps this membrane
`protein (via cGMP) influences salt transport in kidney,
`testis, and other epithelia by a mechanism similar to that
`which regulates salt transport in the small and large
`intestine.
`Data presented in this manuscript suggest that enter-
`otoxin receptors do not occur in glomeruli, distal tubules,
`thick ascending limb of the loop of Henle, or collecting
`tubules. The occurrence of high-affinity receptors for
`1-25I-enterotoxin in the proximal tubule (convoluted and
`pars recta) detected by autoradiography and in brush-
`border membranes does not rule out the possibility that
`other nephron segments and basolateral membranes may
`have this protein. A population of receptors at substan-
`tially lower concentration (i.e., density) may not be re-
`vealed by the in vitro autoradiography technique used in
`these experiments. Moreover, we have not measured 125I-
`enterotoxin binding to putative receptors of kidney baso-
`lateral membranes. However, other studies using such
`approaches with membranes isolated from intestinal mu-
`cosa revealed that enterotoxin receptors were localized
`to the brush-border membranes (4, 8, 9, 12, 17, 23, 28).
`Thus it may be postulated that this receptor protein,
`which in the OK cell line was 120 kDa in mass (11), may
`be an apical membrane protein in proximal tubular cells
`of OK. A similar size of the enterotoxin receptor of about
`100 kDa was observed in the intestine of rats (8).
`ST enterotoxins have three physiological actions. The
`E. coli enterotoxin stimulates cGMP production in the
`intestine (8-10, 18-20, 29), kidney (11), and testis (pres-
`ent study), stimulates chloride secretion in the intestine
`and in crypt cell-like T-84 cells (13, 21), and inhibits
`sodium chloride absorption in the intestine (10, 13, 16,
`29). Thus "traveler's diarrhea" elicited by heat-stable
`enterotoxins is a secretory form of diarrhea that is similar
`to the disorder caused by heat-labile enterotoxins such
`as cholera toxin (13). Binding of the E. coli enterotoxin
`to apical membranes of T-84 cells caused a marked
`increase in apical membrane chloride permeability, prob-
`ably by opening chloride channels in this membrane (21).
`Because analogues of cGMP mimic the effects of E. coli
`enterotoxin on intestinal ion transport, it has been pos-
`tulated that cGMP serves as a second messenger for the
`ST enterotoxins, similar to the adenosine 3' ,5' -cyclic
`monophosphate-mediated effects of cholera toxin to
`cause secretory diarrhea (10, 13, 16, 20). However, ad-
`ministration of E. coli enterotoxin to the opossum acutely
`(11) or chronically (daily) did not appear to influence
`urinary Nat, Cr, or water excretion even though large
`increases in urine cGMP excretion were observed in
`these experiments. In view of the localization of the
`enterotoxin receptors to the proximal renal tubule, it
`may be postulated that the enterotoxin could influence
`
`salt transport in this segment in a fashion analogous to
`the peptides' actions on intestinal salt transport (10, 13,
`16, 21, 29). However, nephron segments distal to the
`proximal tubule may compensate for putative changes in
`filtrate composition elicited by the enterotoxin's ac-
`tion(s) on proximal epithelial cells. It is of interest that
`the intestine, unlike the nephron, has receptors for E.
`coli enterotoxin throughout the small and large intestine.
`Moreover, enterotoxin receptors occurred both in the
`enterocytes of crypts and villi, which agrees with the
`cGMP responses to the enterotoxin that were shown in
`the epithelial cells of crypts or villi (8). Such a distribu-
`tion of receptors throughout the length of the intestine
`may contribute substantially to the massive diarrhea
`produced by ST enterotoxins in mammals (13). The
`action(s) of E. coli enterotoxin on proximal tubular func-
`tion, if any exist, may require micropuncture and/or
`perfusion of proximal tubules to assess the effects of this
`peptide on transport in this nephron segment. Because
`OK and PtK-2 kidney cell lines express enterotoxin
`receptors (11), it may be possible to gain new information
`regarding the physiological actions of ST enterotoxins
`on renal function by use of these proximal tubulelike cell
`lines. Because E. coli enterotoxin regulates apical chlo-
`ride permeability in T-84 intestinal cells via control of
`chloride channels (21), it is tempting to speculate that
`this peptide could exert a similar influence on apical
`membrane chloride channels in proximal tubular cells.
`Such a mechanism implies that the 120-kDa enterotoxin
`receptor protein (11) may serve as a regulator of apical
`chloride channels in kidney, intestine, and perhaps other
`epithelia.
`These experiments revealed that a third tissue, testis,
`expresses receptors for the E. coli enterotoxin. These
`receptors appear to be, like those of OK and intestine,
`coupled positively to the activation of an apical mem-
`brane guanylate cyclase. Membrane-bound guanylate cy-
`clase (22) is also postulated to be an effector mechanism
`for ANF, because atrial peptides stimulate cGMP pro-
`duction in a number of tissues, including kidney, intes-
`tine, and testis (1, 22). We found that ANF stimulated
`cGMP production in the small intestine and kidney
`cortex, but ANF was ineffective under these conditions
`in the testis and colon mucosa of opossums. Thus the
`relative distribution of the ANF and enterotoxin recep-
`tors that are coupled to guanylate cyclase appears to be
`different in these opossum tissues. Receptors for ANF
`that may be responsible for at least part of the natriuretic
`action of this peptide are found in cells of the inner
`medullary collecting ducts (24, 33). If ANF receptors
`exist in the terminal portion of the collecting tubule in
`the opossum, a nephron segment with no apparent en-
`terotoxin receptors, then these receptors may contribute
`substantially to the natriuresis and diuresis elicited by
`ANF in vivo (11). Regulation of Na+ channel permeabil-
`ity of collecting tubules by a cGMP-mediated process
`has been invoked as a cellular mechanism of ANF action
`(15, 24, 33). Both OK proximal tubules and the proximal
`tubular-like (5) OK cell line have enterotoxin receptors
`coupled positively to guanylate cyclase (11). OK cells
`also have ANF receptors (27). Thus a useful approach
`
`

`

`F880
`
`E. COLI ENTEROTOXIN RECEPTORS
`
`for future research may be exploring the effects of E. coli
`enterotoxin and ANF on Na+ permeability by use of the
`OK cell line as an experimental model for proximal
`tubular cells of the opossum.
`In conclusion, receptors for E. coli enterotoxin are
`localized to epithelial cells of the proximal renal tubule,
`seminiferous tubules of testis, and enterocytes in both
`crypts and villi of the small intestine and crypts of the
`colon. These receptors appeared to be associated with
`apical membranes of both kidney cortex and small intes-
`tine of the opossum. The kidney and testis receptors,
`similar to the intestine, are coupled to activation of
`guanylate cyclase. Occurrence of receptors for this family
`of peptides secreted by pathogenic enteric bacteria in
`tissues other than the intestine suggests that this 120-
`kDa membrane protein (11) may have a more general
`role in epithelial cell function than was previously con-
`sidered.
`
`The technical assistance of Sammy Eber, Pam Thorne, Jennifer
`Casati, M. Corlija, and Richard Poelling in carrying out this study is
`greatly appreciated. The help provided by Dr. Wynn Volkert in estab-
`lishing the tissue autoradiography methods was instrumental in com-
`pleting those experiments and we very much appreciate this assistance.
`We also thank Kris Nelson for preparing the manuscript for publica-
`tion.
`This research was supported by funds from the Medical Research
`Service Department of the Veterans Affairs, by the National Institutes
`of Health Grants DK-32848 and HL-10612, and by a Weldon Spring
`Research Award from the University of Missouri.
`Address for reprint requests: L. R. Forte, Dept. of Pharmacology,
`School of Medicine, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO 65212.
`
`Received 9 November 1988; accepted in final form 3 July 1989.
`
`REFERENCES
`
`1. ATLAS, S. A., AND T. MAACK. Effects of atrial natriuretic factor
`on the kidney and the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system. En-
`docrinol. Metab. Clin. N. Am. 16: 107-143, 1987.
`2. BIBER, J., B. STIEGER, AND H. MURER. A high yield preparation
`for rat kidney brush border membranes: different behavior of
`lysosomal markers. Biochem. Biophys. Acta 647: 169-176, 1981.
`3. BRIDGES, R. J., W. RUMMEL, AND B. SIMON. Forskolin induced
`chloride secretion across the isolated mucosa of rat colon descen-
`dens. Arch. Pharmacol. 323: 355-360, 1983.
`4. COHEN, M. B., M. R. THOMPSON, G. J. OVERMANN, AND R.
`GIANNELLA. Association and dissociation of Escherichia coli heat-
`stable enterotoxin from rat brush border membrane receptors.
`Infect. Immunol. 55: 329-334, 1987.
`5. COLE, J. A., S. L. EBER, R. E. POELLING, P. K. THORNE, AND L.
`R. FORTE. A dual mechanism for regulation of kidney phosphate
`transport by parathyroid hormone. Am. J. Physiol. 253 (Endocrinol.
`Metab. 16): E221-E227, 1987.
`6. DIIARMSA

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket