throbber
Regulation of intestinal Cl⫺ and HCO3
`secretion by uroguanylin
`
`⫺
`
`NAM SOO JOO,1 ROSLYN M. LONDON,1,2 HYUN DJU KIM,1
`LEONARD R. FORTE,1,2 AND LANE L. CLARKE3,4
`1Department of Pharmacology, School of Medicine, 3Department of Veterinary Biomedical Sciences,
`College of Veterinary Medicine, and the 4Dalton Cardiovascular Research Center, University
`of Missouri and 2The Truman Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Columbia, Missouri 65212
`
`Joo, Nam Soo, Roslyn M. London, Hyun Dju Kim,
`Leonard R. Forte, and Lane L. Clarke. Regulation of
`⫺ secretion by uroguanylin. Am. J.
`intestinal Cl⫺ and HCO3
`Physiol. 274 (Gastrointest. Liver Physiol. 37): G633–G644,
`1998.—Uroguanylin is an intestinal peptide hormone that
`may regulate epithelial ion transport by activating a receptor
`guanylyl cyclase on the luminal surface of the intestine. In
`this study, we examined the action of uroguanylin on anion
`transport in different segments of freshly excised mouse
`intestine, using voltage-clamped Ussing chambers. Urogua-
`nylin induced larger increases in short-circuit current (Isc) in
`proximal duodenum and cecum compared with jejunum,
`ileum, and distal colon. The acidification of the lumen of the
`proximal duodenum (pH 5.0–5.5) enhanced the stimulatory
`action of uroguanylin. In physiological Ringer solution, a
`significant fraction of the Isc stimulated by uroguanylin was
`⫺ in the
`insensitive to bumetanide and dependent on HCO3
`bathing medium. Experiments using pH-stat titration re-
`⫺
`vealed that uroguanylin stimulates serosal-to-luminal HCO3
`⫺
`HCO3
`) together with a larger increase in Isc. Both
`secretion (J s=l
`⫺
`HCO3
`and Isc were significantly augmented when luminal pH
`J s=l
`was reduced to pH 5.15. Uroguanylin also stimulated the
`⫺
`HCO3
`and Isc across the cecum, but luminal acidity caused a
`J s=l
`generalized decrease in the bioelectric responsiveness to
`agonist stimulation. In cystic fibrosis transmembrane conduc-
`tance regulator (CFTR) knockout mice, the duodenal Isc
`response to uroguanylin was markedly reduced, but not
`eliminated, despite having a similar density of functional
`receptors. It was concluded that uroguanylin is most effective
`in acidic regions of the small intestine, where it stimulates
`⫺ and Cl⫺ secretion primarily via a CFTR-depen-
`both HCO3
`dent mechanism.
`cyclic GMP; bicarbonate transport; chloride transport; cystic
`fibrosis; cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regula-
`tor; guanylyl cyclase; mouse intestine; proximal duodenum
`
`

`

`G634
`
`PHYSIOLOGICAL FUNCTIONS OF UROGUANYLIN
`
`short-circuit current (Isc), an index of anion secretion.
`In the most responsive intestinal segments (proximal
`duodenum and cecum), we examined the pH depen-
`dence of uroguanylin in stimulating transepithelial
`⫺ across the mucosa.
`secretion of Cl⫺ and HCO3
`MATERIALS AND METHODS
`
`Animals
`
`Female C57BL6 mice 8–10 wk old were housed in a
`standard animal care room with a 12:12-h light-dark cycle.
`Animals were allowed free access to food and water until the
`time of study. CFTR knockout and normal littermate mice
`(B6.129-Cftrtm/UNC; C57BL/6J-Cftrtm/UNC) were also main-
`tained on standard laboratory chow, but the water contained
`an osmotic laxative (polyethylene glycol) to reduce intestinal
`malfunction in the cftr(⫺/⫺) mice (5). All experiments involv-
`ing the animals were approved by the University Institu-
`tional Animal Care and Use Committee.
`
`Tissue Preparation
`
`Before each experiment, the mice were fasted for a mini-
`mum of 1 h and only water was provided. The mice were killed
`by a brief exposure to a 100% CO2 gas atmosphere (to induce
`narcosis), followed immediately by a surgical pneumothorax.
`A midline abdominal incision was used to excise the gallblad-
`der and the following intestinal segments: proximal duode-
`num (a portion from 2 mm distal to the pylorus to the
`sphincter of Oddi), midjejunum, ileum, cecum (a portion 1–2
`cm proximal to the cecal apex), and distal colon. The excised
`segments were opened along the mesenteric border in ice-
`cold, oxygenated Krebs-Ringer-bicarbonate (KRB) solution
`and pinned mucosal-side down on a pliable silicone surface.
`The intestinal sections were stripped of their outer muscle
`layers by shallow dissection with a scalpel and fine forceps.
`
`Bioelectric Measurements
`Each intestinal sheet (⬃1 cm in length) and the microdis-
`sected gallbladder (with a support of nylon gauze) were
`mounted in standard Ussing chambers with an exposed
`surface area of 0.25 cm2 for intestinal preparations (or 0.126
`cm2 for ileum and colon) and 0.049 cm2 for the gallbladder as
`previously described (5). The tissue sheets were indepen-
`dently bathed on the serosal and mucosal surfaces with 4 ml
`of KRB solution containing (in mM) 115 NaCl, 4 K2HPO4, 0.4
`KH2PO4, 25 NaHCO3, 1.2 MgCl2, and 1.2 CaCl2, pH 7.4. To
`facilitate pH adjustment of the medium in some experiments,
`a phosphate-free Ringer solution of the following composition
`was used (in mM): 115 NaCl, 5 KCl, 25 NaHCO3, 1.2 MgSO4,
`and 1.2 calcium gluconate, pH 7.4. In ion substitution experi-
`⫺ and Cl⫺ were replaced with TES and gluconate,
`ments, HCO3
`respectively. Glucose (10 mM) was included in the serosal
`solution (both baths in large intestinal preparations), and 10
`mM mannitol was substituted for glucose in the mucosal bath
`to prevent Na⫹-coupled glucose current stimulation. To mini-
`mize tissue exposure to endogenously generated prostaglan-
`dins during tissue preparation and mounting, indomethacin
`(1.0 µM) was present in both baths throughout the experi-
`ment. KRB solutions were gassed with 95% O2-5% CO2,
`⫺-free bathing solutions were gassed with 100%
`whereas HCO3
`O2. The solutions were circulated via a gas-lift recirculation
`system and were maintained at 37°C by water-jacketed
`reservoirs. In all experiments, TTX (0.1 µM) was added to the
`serosal bath at least 20 min before each experiment to
`prevent any intrinsic neural influence on ion transport regu-
`lation of the intestine (47).
`
`Transmural Isc (µA/cm2 tissue surface area) was measured
`with the use of an automatic voltage clamp device (VCC-600;
`Physiologic Instruments, San Diego, CA) that compensates
`for electrode offset and the fluid resistance between the
`potential-measuring electrode bridges. Transepithelial poten-
`tial difference (in mV) was measured via a pair of calomel
`half-cells connected to the serosal and mucosal baths by 4%
`agar-Ringer (wt/vol) bridges. Isc was applied across the tissue
`via a pair of Ag/AgCl electrodes that were kept in contact with
`the serosal and mucosal baths through 4% agar-Ringer
`bridges. All experiments were carried out under short-
`circuited conditions. Total tissue conductance (Gt, mS/cm2
`tissue surface area) was calculated by applying Ohm’s law to
`the current deflection resulting from a 5-mV bipolar pulse
`across the tissue every 5 min during the course of the
`experiment. In all cases, the serosal side served as ground
`and the Isc was conventionally referred to as negative when
`current flowed from the lumen to the serosa.
`After the tissues achieved a stable Isc (⬃20 min post-TTX),
`a 20-min period was required to adjust the luminal bath pH.
`The small intestine and gallbladder preparations were then
`sequentially exposed to a peptide (uroguanylin, 1.0 µM;
`guanylin, 1.0 µM; or STa, 0.02 µM) in the luminal bath for 30
`min and then to bumetanide (0.1 mM) in the serosal bath for
`10 min to inhibit the Na⫹-K⫹-2 Cl⫺ cotransporter. After pH
`adjustment, large intestinal preparations were first treated
`with amiloride (0.1 mM) in the luminal bath for 20 min to
`inhibit electrogenic Na⫹ absorption and were then treated
`with peptide addition followed by bumetanide. In studies in
`which the effects of acidic pH on the action of the peptides
`were examined, the proximal duodenum, jejunum, and cecum
`were used, and the pH of the luminal bath was decreased to
`pH 5.0–5.5 by addition of 1 N HCl. An equal amount of 1 M
`NaCl was added simultaneously to the serosal bath to pre-
`vent a transepithelial Cl⫺ diffusion potential. At the end of an
`experiment, glucose (10 mM) was added to the luminal bath
`of the small intestinal preparations and carbachol (CCh; 0.1
`mM) was added to the serosal bath of the large intestinal
`preparations as measures of tissue viability.
`
`Bioassay for cGMP Accumulation in Mouse Intestine
`
`Mucosal epithelium was prepared by scraping the intesti-
`nal segment from cftr(⫺/⫺) and cftr(⫹/⫹) mice and washing
`it gently once in 0.9% NaCl and twice in DMEM containing 20
`mM HEPES, pH 7.4. The mucosal suspension (⬃60 mg wet
`wt) was placed in 0.2 ml DMEM (pH 7.4) at 4°C. The tissue
`was incubated for 40 min at 37°C with either 1.0 µM
`uroguanylin, 1.0 µM guanylin, or vehicle that was added to
`the DMEM-HEPES with 1.0 mM 3-isobutyl-1-methylxan-
`thine. At the end of the 40-min period, perchloric acid was
`added to a final concentration of 3.3%, the cells were centri-
`fuged, and the resulting supernatants were neutralized with
`1 N KOH. The supernatants were used to measure cGMP
`concentration by radioimmunoassay as described previously
`(15).
`
`pH-Stat Titration
`
`Proximal duodenum or cecum was mounted in a standard
`Ussing chamber bathed with 156.2 mM NaCl in the luminal
`bath and KRB in the serosal bath. In cecal experiments, 1.2
`mM CaCl2 and MgCl2 were also added to the luminal bath.
`The luminal bath was gassed with 100% O2 and the serosal
`bath with 95% O2-5% CO2. To decrease the pH of the luminal
`bath, the luminal saline solution was gassed with 95% O2-5%
`CO2 and maintained at pH 5.15. The serosal-to-luminal flux
`⫺
`HCO3
`
`of HCO3⫺ (J s=l
`) was measured by continuously titrat-
`
`Downloaded from journals.physiology.org/journal/ajpgi (165.001.202.250) on February 23, 2022.
`
`

`

`PHYSIOLOGICAL FUNCTIONS OF UROGUANYLIN
`
`G635
`
`ing the luminal solution to pH 7.4 (or pH 5.15) with 5 mM
`HCl, using either a computer-aided titrimeter (model 455/
`465; Fisher) or manual addition of titrant. The volume of
`⫺ flux, taking into
`added acid was used to calculate the HCO3
`account the exposed surface area of tissue (0.25 cm2) and
`⫺
`HCO3
`time. Typically, J s=l
`stabilized within 30 min after the
`tissue was mounted and a basal flux period was initiated.
`After 30 min, uroguanylin (1.0 µM) was added to the luminal
`⫺
`stabilized (⬃20 min), a second
`HCO3
`bath, and when the J s=l
`30-min flux period was initiated.
`
`Receptor Autoradiography
`
`Dissected intestinal segments (proximal duodenum, midje-
`junum, ileum, cecum, and distal colon) from control and
`CFTR knockout mice were quickly frozen with dry ice and
`stored at ⫺80°C. The frozen tissue samples were sectioned to
`a 12-µm thickness in a cryostat device (2800 Frigocut N,
`Reichert-Jung; Leica Instrument, Germany) maintained at
`⫺20°C. Two sections were placed on opposite ends of a
`gelatin-coated slide, one for total binding (TB) and one for
`nonspecific binding (NSB), and then dried and stored at
`⫺80°C until used. Iodinated STa was used as the radioligand
`for this assay and was prepared by a modification of the
`method described by Krause and co-workers (35). The use of
`STa was necessary because iodination of guanylin (Tyr-9)
`may decrease the biological activity of this ligand (35) and
`uroguanylin has no tyrosine residue available for labeling.
`For the assay, each section on the slide was incubated with 30
`µl of DMEM containing 0.5% BSA to minimize background
`labeling (pH 5.5 at 37°C for 20 min). Total binding of
`125I-labeled STa was assessed by incubating 30 µl DMEM
`containing 1,000 cpm/µl 125I-STa on one section, and nonspe-
`cific binding was assessed by incubating 30 µl DMEM contain-
`ing both 125I-STa and unlabeled STa (1.0 µM), uroguanylin (10
`µM), or guanylin (10 µM) on the other section. After a 20-min
`incubation at 37°C, slides were washed five times with
`ice-cold phosphate-buffered saline solution and then air-
`dried. To verify labeling in the different intestinal segments,
`the slides were arranged in cassettes and exposed to Kodak
`X-OMAT AR (XAR 5) film overnight at ⫺80°C, and then the
`film was developed. Slides were then transferred in a dark
`room, coated with Kodak NTB-2 emulsion solution, and dried
`overnight. The emulsion-coated slides were sealed in light-
`tight boxes and stored at 4°C for 2–3 wk until they were
`developed. After development, fixation, and coverslipping, the
`radiolabeled TB and NSB sections were examined under
`bright- and dark-field microscopy.
`
`Materials
`
`Opossum uroguanylin (QEDCELCINVACTGC) and E. coli
`ST (CCELCCNPACTGC), STa13, were synthesized by the
`solid-phase method, using an Applied Biosystems peptide
`synthesizer, as previously described (25). Opossum urogua-
`nylin differs from murine uroguanylin (TDECELCINVAC-
`TGC) only in the sequence of the first three amino acids.
`Purified rat guanylin (PNTCEICAYAACTGC) was generously
`provided by Dr. Mark Currie (Searle Research and Develop-
`ment, St. Louis, MO). The iodination of E. coli ST (NSSNYC-
`CELCCNPACTGCY) was performed using a lactoperoxidase
`method as previously described (15, 16). Membrane-perme-
`able 8-bromo-cAMP (8-BrcAMP) and 8-bromo-cGMP (8-
`BrcGMP) were obtained from Research Biochemical Interna-
`tional (Natick, MA). All other chemicals were purchased from
`either Sigma Chemical (St. Louis, MO) or Fisher Scientific
`(Springfield, IL). Uroguanylin, guanylin, and E. coli STa were
`dissolved in deionized water at a stock concentration (s.c.) of 1
`
`mM. TTX was dissolved in 0.2% acetic acid at a stock
`concentration of 0.1 mM. Indomethacin (s.c., 10 mM), bu-
`metanide (s.c., 0.1 M), methazolamide (s.c., 1.0 M), DIDS (s.c.,
`0.3 M), and amiloride (s.c., 0.1 M) were dissolved in DMSO.
`
`Data Analysis
`
`Data are means ⫾ SE. Student’s t-test for paired or
`unpaired data or an ANOVA protected least-significant differ-
`ent test was used for comparisons of means among different
`intestinal segments and different treatment groups. In all
`cases, P ⬍ 0.05 was accepted as a statistically significant
`difference.
`
`RESULTS
`
`Segmental Responses to Uroguanylin in the
`Mouse Intestine
`Figure 1A shows the pattern of Isc responses to
`sequential treatment with specific agents on proximal
`duodenum. After the tissue was mounted, the addition
`of TTX (0.1 µM, serosal bath) resulted in a decrease in
`the baseline Isc to a stable value within 20 min.
`Uroguanylin (1.0 µM, luminal bath) caused a rapid
`increase in Isc, which was sustained for a 40-min period.
`Subsequent addition of STa (1.0 µM, luminal bath)
`elicited a further increase in Isc. Bumetanide (0.1 mM,
`serosal bath) treatment resulted in a decrease in the Isc
`but to a level that was elevated relative to the Isc before
`the uroguanylin/STa treatment. The inhibitory effect of
`bumetanide on Isc typically reached steady state by 10
`min posttreatment, i.e., the percentage of bumetanide
`inhibition at 5 min was equal to 98 ⫾ 1.1% of the Isc at
`10 min postbumetanide (n ⫽ 15) in proximal duode-
`num. Glucose (10 mM, luminal bath) addition intended
`to stimulate Na⫹-coupled glucose transport caused a
`rapid increase in Isc. In contrast to apical treatment, the
`addition of either uroguanylin or STa to the serosal
`bath solution had no effect on the Isc (Fig. 1B).
`Cumulative data of the Isc responses to uroguanylin
`(1.0 µM) by different intestinal segments and the
`gallbladder are shown in Fig. 2. Uroguanylin elicited
`an Isc response in all intestinal segments but had no
`stimulatory effect on the gallbladder preparations.
`Proximal duodenum and cecum had the greatest mean
`Isc responses to uroguanylin (1.0 µM) and were not
`significantly different from each other. However, the Isc
`response in the proximal duodenum was significantly
`greater than the responses in the other small intestinal
`segments (jejunum and ileum). Likewise, the cecum
`had a greater Isc response than did the distal colon. The
`concentration of uroguanylin (1.0 µM) used in these
`experiments was not a maximally stimulatory dose,
`since subsequent addition of STa (1.0 µM) elicited
`further increases in the Isc in all intestinal segments
`that were tested (⌬Isc, in µA/cm2): 95.5 ⫾ 10.3 in
`proximal duodenum (n ⫽ 7), 112.0 ⫾ 18.5 in jejunum
`(n ⫽ 9), 64.5 ⫾ 10.5 in ileum (n ⫽ 9), 77.5 ⫾ 15.8 in
`cecum (n ⫽ 9), and 58.4 ⫾ 13.5 in distal colon (n ⫽ 7).
`Proximal Duodenum
`Effect of luminal acidic pH on uroguanylin action. To
`examine the effect of luminal acidity on uroguanylin
`
`Downloaded from journals.physiology.org/journal/ajpgi (165.001.202.250) on February 23, 2022.
`
`

`

`G636
`
`A
`
`-250
`
`-225
`
`-200
`
`-175
`
`-100
`
`-75
`
`-50
`
`-25
`
`0
`0
`
`TTX Uroguanylin
`
`1 1
`
`STa
`
`1
`
`Bumet GIc
`
`1 1
`
`20
`
`40
`
`80
`60
`Time (min)
`
`100
`
`120
`
`TTX Uroguanylin
`
`1 1
`
`-250
`
`-225
`
`-200
`
`-175
`
`STa
`
`1
`
`Bumet Glc
`
`1 1
`
`-100
`
`to
`
`-75
`
`-50
`
`-25
`
`100
`
`120
`
`20
`
`40
`
`80
`60
`Time (min)
`Fig. 1. Time course of short-circuit current (Isc) response to sequen-
`tial treatments in mouse intestine. Data are representative of 11
`separate experiments with proximal duodenum bathed in standard
`Krebs-Ringer-bicarbonate (KRB). A: uroguanylin (1.0 µM), Esch-
`erichia coli heat-stable enterotoxin (STa13; 1.0 µM), and glucose (Glc,
`10 mM) were applied to the luminal bath. B: uroguanylin (1.0 µM)
`and STa (1.0 µM) were added to serosal bath. TTX (0.1 µM) and
`bumetanide (Bumet; 0.1 mM) were added to serosal bath.
`
`bioactivity in the native intestine, the pH of the luminal
`bath was reduced to 5.0–5.5 for 20 min before the tissue
`was treated with the peptide agonists (pH adjustment
`period). The proximal duodenum was chosen because
`this segment elicited pronounced increases in urogua-
`nylin-induced Isc (Fig. 2) and because this part of the
`small intestine has an acidic intraluminal environment
`during digestion (1). The intraluminal pH reduction
`caused a rapid and reproducible increase in the Isc of
`13.4 ⫾ 2.7 µA/cm2, reaching a new steady-state Isc
`
`PHYSIOLOGICAL FUNCTIONS OF UROGUANYLIN
`
`baseline in about 5 min (Fig. 3A, pH adjustment
`period). A recent study suggests that the acid-induced
`current may represent stimulation of electrogenic,
`⫺ secretion in the murine duode-
`CFTR-dependent HCO3
`num (30). Subsequent uroguanylin treatment at the
`acidic pH produced an approximately twofold greater
`(P ⬍ 0.05) increase in Isc than was observed at pH 7.4
`(Fig. 3, A and B). Again, the increased Isc elicited by
`uroguanylin was only partially inhibited by bumetanide
`treatment: 18.7 ⫾ 5.7% at pH 7.4 and 27.0 ⫾ 8.0% at pH
`5.0–5.5 (Fig. 3B). At both pH conditions, uroguanylin
`treatment slightly increased Gt, but the changes were
`not statistically different from each other: 2.0 ⫾ 0.4
`mS/cm2 at pH 7.4 and 3.1 ⫾ 0.3 mS/cm2 at acidic pH.
`The effect of luminal acidity on uroguanylin bioactivity
`in jejunal tissue was also examined. The reduction of
`intraluminal pH to 5.0–5.5 again increased basal Isc
`(19.6 ⫾ 4.8 µA/cm2), and subsequent treatment with
`1.0 µM uroguanylin at acidic pH produced a signifi-
`cantly larger increase in Isc than was observed at pH 7.4
`(66 ⫾ 4.2 vs. 44.6 ⫾ 5.8 µA/cm2, P ⬍ 0.05, n ⫽ 4). In a
`dose-response study, uroguanylin was more active (P ⬍
`0.05) in acidic luminal conditions than at pH 7.4 within
`the tested range of concentrations (Fig. 4). It was not
`possible to test higher concentrations of uroguanylin
`because the supply of the peptide was inadequate for
`the experiment.
`Effect of luminal acidity on the actions of 8-BrcGMP
`and 8-BrcAMP. To test whether the effect of luminal
`acidity on uroguanylin action resulted from an effect of
`low extracellular pH on the bioelectric properties or
`intracellular signaling pathways of the epithelial cells,
`the Isc responses elicited by membrane-permeable cy-
`clic nucleotides, 8-BrcGMP and 8-BrcAMP, were exam-
`ined at acidic and physiological pH. In the proximal
`
`60
`
`50-
`
`40—
`
`30—
`
`20—
`
`10-
`
`cs7. -
`
`E 0
`
`r..)
`cn
`<1
`
`a,b
`
`b,c
`
`0
`
`1
`
`1
`
`Ileum
`
`Cecum
`
`II
`Proximal Mid
`Distal Gallbladder
`Colon
`Duodenum Jejunum
`Fig. 2. Segmental responses to luminal uroguanylin in mouse intesti-
`nal preparations. All tissues were bathed with standard KRB solu-
`tion. ⌬Isc was calculated as baseline Isc minus maximal Isc response to
`uroguanylin. Large intestinal epithelia (cecum and distal colon) were
`pretreated with amiloride (0.1 mM, luminal bath) 20 min before
`uroguanylin addition. Values are means ⫾ SE obtained from proxi-
`mal duodenum (n ⫽ 11), midjejunum (n ⫽ 9), ileum (n ⫽ 9), cecum
`(n ⫽ 12), distal colon (n ⫽ 5), and gallbladder (n ⫽ 4). Means without
`a letter in common are significantly different; one-way ANOVA
`protected least-significant difference test, P ⬍ 0.05.
`
`Downloaded from journals.physiology.org/journal/ajpgi (165.001.202.250) on February 23, 2022.
`
`

`

`PHYSIOLOGICAL FUNCTIONS OF UROGUANYLIN
`
`G637
`
`TTX pH adjustment Uroguanylin
`
`1 1 1
`
`-+-- pH 5.0-5.5
`—c— pH 7.4
`
`Bumet Glc
`
`1 1
`
`A
`
`-200
`
`-180
`
`-160
`
`-140
`
`"E -120
`O
`
`-100
`3.
`
`-80
`
`-o-- pH 5.0-5.5
`-0- pH 7.4
`
`120
`
`100
`
`80
`
`60
`
`40
`
`20
`
`c.)
`
`0
`
`20
`
`60
`40
`Time (min)
`
`80
`
`100
`
`Uroguanylin (1.0 µM)
`+Bumet (0.1 mM)
`
`-60
`
`-40
`
`-20
`
`0
`
`0
`
`B
`
`125-
`
`100-
`
`25-
`
`pH 7.4
`pH 5.0-5.5
`Fig. 3. Effect of pH on Isc response to uroguanylin in mouse proximal
`duodenum. A: representative time course of Isc response to agents in
`proximal duodenum superfused with Ringer solution at either pH
`5.0⬃5.5 or pH 7.4 in luminal bath. Luminal pH was reduced to pH
`5.0–5.5 by addition of 1.0 N HCl (pH adjustment), and serosal pH was
`maintained at 7.4. TTX (0.1 µM), uroguanylin (1.0 µM), and glucose
`(10 mM) were added to luminal bath, and bumetanide (0.1 mM) was
`added to serosal bath. B: cumulative data showing maximal change
`in Isc (⌬Isc) from baseline during uroguanylin treatment and after
`sequential addition of bumetanide (⫹Bumet). Results are means ⫾
`SE from intact proximal duodena of 8 (pH 7.4 group) and 9 (acid-
`treated group) different mice. *Significantly different from urogua-
`nylin treatment (paired t-test, P ⬍ 0.05). †Significantly different from
`pH 7.4 group (unpaired t-test, P ⬍ 0.05).
`
`duodenum, membrane-permeable 8-BrcGMP (20 µM)
`stimulated the Isc more than did an equimolar concen-
`tration of 8-BrcAMP (P ⬍ 0.001) (Fig. 5). However, the
`Isc response elicited by 8-BrcGMP at pH 7.4 was similar
`to that observed under acidic luminal conditions. In
`contrast, 8-BrcAMP (20 µM) was significantly less
`effective under acidic conditions than at pH 7.4 (P ⬍
`0.05). The increased Isc elicited by either 8-BrcGMP or
`
`-8
`
`-5
`
`-7
`Log [Uroguanylin, M]
`Fig. 4. Effect of luminal bath pH on noncumulative concentration-Isc
`response curve for uroguanylin in intact mouse proximal duodenum.
`Luminal bath pH was reduced to 5.0–5.5 by addition of 1.0 N HCl,
`and basolateral pH was maintained at pH 7.4. ⌬Isc was calculated as
`baseline Isc minus maximal Isc response to uroguanylin. Values are
`means ⫾ SE obtained from 4–9 different mice. *Significantly differ-
`ent from pH 7.4 group (unpaired t-test, P ⬍ 0.01).
`
`8-BrcAMP was significantly inhibited (P ⬍ 0.05) by
`bumetanide (0.1 mM) treatment: 59.3 ⫾ 1.8% at pH 7.4
`and 65.7 ⫾ 3.4% at pH 5.0–5.5, or 61.5 ⫾ 5.9% at pH 7.4
`and 90.8 ⫾ 4.2% at pH 5.0–5.5, respectively.
`Effect of luminal acidity on guanylin and STa ac-
`tions. To investigate whether the pH dependence was
`specific for uroguanylin action, we examined the effects
`of acidic pH on the secretagogue actions of guanylin
`and STa (Fig. 6). Whereas uroguanylin is more effective
`in stimulating the Isc under acidic luminal conditions
`
`120-
`
`100-
`
`80-
`
`6
`
`E
`
`-1 40-
`
`20-
`
`CI pH 7.4
`pH 5.0-5.5
`
`*
`
`0
`
`8 Br-cAMP +Bumet
`8-Br-cGMP +Bumet
`Proximal Duodenum
`Fig. 5. Effect of luminal bath pH on Isc response to membrane-
`permeable cyclic nucleotides in mouse proximal duodenum. 8-
`BrcGMP (20 µM) or 8-BrcAMP (20 µM) was added to both luminal
`and serosal baths 20 min after pH adjustment. Bumetanide (0.1 mM)
`was added to serosal bath 30 min later. ⌬Isc was calculated as
`baseline Isc minus maximal Isc response during cyclic nucleotide
`treatment and after subsequent treatment with bumetanide. Data
`are means ⫾ SE; proximal duodena were obtained from 4–6 different
`mice in each cyclic nucleotide treatment group. *Significantly differ-
`ent from 8-BrcGMP-treated group (unpaired t-test; P ⬍ 0.001).
`†Significantly different from pH 7.4 (unpaired t-test; P ⬍ 0.05).
`
`Downloaded from journals.physiology.org/journal/ajpgi (165.001.202.250) on February 23, 2022.
`
`

`

`I
`
`I Uroguanylin (1.0 µM)
`+Bumetanide (0.1 mM)
`
`G638
`
`PHYSIOLOGICAL FUNCTIONS OF UROGUANYLIN
`
`50-
`
`40-
`
`30-
`
`20-
`
`10-
`
`Change from Basal Isc (RA/cm2)
`
`CI pH 7.4
`pH 5.0-5.5
`
`100-
`
`80-
`
`60-
`
`20-
`
`T
`
`0
`
`STa (20 nM)
`
`Uroguanylin (1.0 µM)
`Guanylin (1.0 µM)
`Proximal Duodenum
`Fig. 6. Effect of luminal bath pH on Isc response to uroguanylin,
`guanylin, and STa in intact mouse proximal duodenum. Each peptide
`was added to luminal bath 40 min after TTX treatment (20 min after
`pH adjustment period). ⌬Isc was calculated as baseline Isc minus
`maximal Isc response to a peptide. Results are means ⫾ SE; proximal
`duodena were obtained from 6–9 different mice for each peptide
`tested. *Significantly different from pH 7.4 group (unpaired t-test,
`P ⬍ 0.05).
`
`(P ⬍ 0.01), the Isc response to guanylin (1.0 µM) was
`significantly reduced at acidic pH compared with pH
`7.4 (P ⫽ 0.05). In contrast, the Isc responses to STa (20
`nM) did not appear to be pH dependent. The Isc
`responses induced by guanylin or STa were incom-
`pletely inhibited by serosal bumetanide treatment (25–
`35% at pH 7.4; 50% at acidic pH) (data not shown). Gt in
`STa-treated or guanylin-treated groups under acidic
`intraluminal conditions was increased by 3–4 mS/cm2,
`whereas at pH 7.4, ⌬Gt in this period was ⬃0.5–1.0
`mS/cm2.
`⫺ secretion by urogua-
`Stimulation of Cl⫺ and HCO3
`nylin. As stated, a major fraction of the Isc stimulated
`by uroguanylin across the proximal duodenum bathed
`in KRB solution (pH 7.4) was insensitive to serosal
`bumetanide treatment (Fig. 3B). Therefore, ion substi-
`tution experiments were used to investigate the ionic
`basis of the Isc stimulated by 1.0 µM uroguanylin (Fig.
`⫺-free Ringer solution containing the car-
`7). In HCO3
`bonic anhydrase inhibitor methazolamide (1.0 mM),
`the uroguanylin-induced Isc in proximal duodenum was
`completely abolished by bumetanide. In contrast, in
`⫺, the urogua-
`Cl⫺-free Ringer solution containing HCO3
`nylin-induced Isc was markedly reduced but bumetanide
`had no effect on the stimulated Isc. In the absence of
`⫺/CO2 and Cl⫺, uroguanylin had no stimula-
`both HCO3
`tory effect on the Isc. Amiloride (0.1 mM, luminal bath)
`pretreatment of the proximal duodenum to inhibit
`electrogenic Na⫹ absorption also did not affect the
`uroguanylin-induced Isc (data not shown).
`Taken together, these findings suggest that urogua-
`⫺ secretory currents
`nylin stimulates both Cl⫺ and HCO3
`across the duodenum bathed in physiological Ringer
`solution, similar to guanylin action in the rat (23). To
`⫺ (base) secretion directly,
`estimate changes in HCO3
`pH-stat studies of proximal duodenum under voltage-
`
`10
`
`HCO3-free
`
`HCO3/CI-free
`
`Cl-free
`Ringer Solution
`Fig. 7. Effect of anion-substituted Ringer solutions on Isc response to
`uroguanylin in intact mouse proximal duodenum. Sodium bicarbon-
`ate was replaced with TES. Gluconate was substituted for Cl⫺ in
`⫺/Cl⫺-free solutions. Methazolamide (1.0 mM) was
`Cl⫺-free and HCO3
`added to both luminal and serosal bath solutions 20 min before
`⫺-free Ringer solutions.
`luminal uroguanylin application in HCO3
`Bumetanide (0.1 mM) was added to serosal bath 30 min after
`uroguanylin. Change from basal Isc was calculated as pretreatment
`Isc minus maximal Isc recorded after uroguanylin or 10 min after
`bumetanide treatment. Values are means ⫾ SE; proximal duodena
`were obtained from 6–9 different mice in each treatment group.
`*Significantly different from uroguanylin-treated group (paired t-
`test, P ⬍ 0.01).
`
`clamp conditions were used to measure the effect of
`⫺
`HCO3
`. The values of Isc in Table 1 are
`uroguanylin on J s=l
`given in microequivalents per square centimeter per
`⫺
`HCO3
`. As shown
`hour to facilitate the comparison with J s=l
`in Table 1, uroguanylin (1.0 µM) at pH 7.4 stimulated
`⫺
`HCO3
`and the Isc. At luminal pH 5.15, the basal
`the J s=l
`⫺
`HCO3
`and Isc were larger than the basal param-
`mean J s=l
`eters measured at pH 7.4 (P ⬍ 0.05, unpaired t-test). In
`part, this difference was due to spontaneous increases
`⫺
`HCO3
`and Isc with the concomitant appear-
`in both the J s=l
`ance of amorphous material (mucus) in the luminal
`bath during the application of pH 5.15. Several solution
`changes of the luminal bath proved to be useful in
`minimizing the spontaneous increases in the measured
`
`Table 1. Effect of luminal pH and uroguanylin on
`⫺
`HCO3
`and Isc across murine proximal duodenum
`J s=l
`
`Luminal pH 7.4
`Basal
`Uroguanylin
`⌬ (Basal ⫺ uroguanylin)
`Luminal pH 5.15
`Basal
`Uroguanylin
`⌬ (Basal ⫺ uroguanylin)
`
`⫺
`HCO3
`J s=l
`µeq · cm⫺2 · h⫺1
`
`Isc ,
`µeq · cm⫺2 · h⫺1
`
`0.78 ⫾ 0.07
`2.27 ⫾ 0.29*
`1.48 ⫾ 0.22
`
`1.82 ⫾ 0.13
`3.94 ⫾ 0.17*
`2.08 ⫾ 0.08†
`
`⫺1.28 ⫾ 0.55
`⫺3.80 ⫾ 0.81*
`⫺2.52 ⫾ 0.28
`
`⫺2.49 ⫾ 0.20
`⫺7.30 ⫾ 0.77*
`⫺4.81 ⫾ 0.91†
`
`⫺
`HCO3
`Values are means ⫾ SE (n ⫽ 4). J s=l
`, serosal-to-luminal flux of
`⫺. *Significantly different from basal value (paired t-test,
`HCO3
`P ⬍0.05). †Significantly different from pH 7.4 (unpaired t-test,
`P ⬍0.05).
`
`Downloaded from journals.physiology.org/journal/ajpgi (165.001.202.250) on February 23, 2022.
`
`

`

`PHYSIOLOGICAL FUNCTIONS OF UROGUANYLIN
`
`G639
`
`parameters. Nevertheless, subsequent application of
`uroguanylin at pH 5.15 produced pronounced increases
`⫺
`HCO3
`and Isc. The magnitude of the changes at
`in both J s=l
`pH 5.15 was significantly greater than the uroguanylin-
`⫺
`HCO3
`and Isc in duodena bathed at
`induced changes of J s=l
`pH 7.4. This finding was particularly significant be-
`cause it eliminated the possibility that the increased
`action of uroguanylin at acidic pH was the result of
`⫺ se-
`increasing the electrochemical gradient for HCO3
`cretion. In the initial studies (see Figs. 3 and 4), the
`luminal pH was reduced by adding HCl directly to the
`⫺-buffered KRB. This maneuver essentially re-
`HCO3
`⫺ from the luminal solution and thereby
`moves HCO3
`⫺ secre-
`increases the electrochemical gradient for HCO3
`tion. However, all pH-stat studies were performed in
`⫺; thus the electrochemical
`the absence of luminal HCO3
`⫺ efflux across the luminal mem-
`driving force for HCO3
`brane was essentially equivalent at both pH 5.15 and
`7.4. The total Gt of the proximal duodenum exposed to
`either pH 7.4 or 5.15 increased during uroguanylin
`treatment, but the changes were not significantly differ-
`ent from each other (⌬Gt ⫽ 20.3% at pH 7.4 and 26.3%
`at pH 5.15; not significant). The increased Gt was
`greater than that recorded at the peak ⌬Isc in the
`earlier experiments, but this may be a reflection of the
`longer experimental period. Furthermore, inspection of
`the data from the individual experiments did not reveal
`⫺
`HCO3
`, i.e.,
`an obvious correlation between Gt and J s=l
`greater increases in Gt were not associated with propor-
`⫺
`HCO3
`.
`tional increases in J s=l
`Uroguanylin stimulates Isc in duodenum of CF mice.
`Although it is well documented that intestinal epithelia
`from CFTR knockout mice have virtually no Isc re-
`sponse to agents that elevate intracellular cAMP or
`cGMP (4, 7, 21), it was of interest to examine the effects
`of uroguanylin on the Isc of proximal duodenum in
`CFTR knockout mice. Surprisingly, as shown in Fig.
`8A, uroguanylin (1.0 µM) resulted in a small but
`reproducible increase in Isc of 7.7 ⫾ 0.6 µA/cm2 (mean ⫾
`SE) in the proximal duodenum of cystic fibrosis (CF)
`mice. Basolateral bumetanide (0.1 mM) application did
`not inhibit the Isc response elicited by uroguanylin.
`Luminal glucose addition stimulated the Isc similarly
`across the duodenum from CF compared with normal
`mice. Dose-dependent increases in Isc by uroguanylin in
`the proximal duodenum of CFTR knockout mice are
`shown in Fig. 8B. A maximal response of 13.5 ⫾ 0.2
`µA/cm2 was elicited by 10 µM uroguanylin.
`Uroguanylin/guanylin receptors in the murine duode-
`num and other intestinal segments. To characterize
`uroguanylin, guanylin, and STa receptors in the mouse
`intestine, we used 125I-STa receptor autoradiography
`and an in vitro cGMP bioassay to estimate the density
`of functional receptors in the intestinal mucosa. 125I-
`STa binding was apparent in both villus and crypt
`epithelia of the intestinal preparations (Fig. 9, A and
`B). In contrast, 125I-STa binding sites were not found in
`the tissue layers of the intestinal wall, including the
`lamina propria, submucosal elements, or smooth muscle
`
`TTX
`
`pH 7.4 Uroguanylin
`
`1 1 1
`
`Bumet GM
`
`11
`
`A
`
`N
`E O
`...4
`O U)
`
`-80
`
`-60
`
`-40
`
`-20
`
`0
`
`0
`
`20
`
`60
`40
`Time (min)
`
`80
`
`100
`
`B
`
`16-
`
`12.5 -
`
`fir
`
`M
`
`10-
`
`eT
`E 0
`..,
`...
`0
`cn
`-,t1 5.0-
`
`7.5
`
`2.5
`
`1.0 µM
`
`10 µM
`
`3.0 µM
`[UROGUANYLIN]
`Fig. 8. Effect of uroguanylin on Isc across proximal duodenum from
`cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFT

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket