throbber
THE JOURNAL ()f B10LOGWAL CHEMJSTR\'
`© 1993 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
`
`VoL 268, No. 30, Issue of October 25, pp. 22397-22401, 1993
`Printed in U.S.A.
`
`Processing and Characterization of Human Proguanylin Expressed
`in Escherichia coli*
`
`(Received for publication, June 30, 1993)
`
`K. Christopher Garcia:1:§§, Frederic J. de Sauvage:I:, Martin Struble§, William Henzel,i.
`Dorothea Reillyll, and David V. Goeddel:f:**
`From tfu! Departments of §§Protein Engineering, Wolecular Biology, §Bioorganic Chemistry, 'l]Protein Chemistry, and
`!Process Development, Genentech Inc., South San Francisco, California 94080
`
`Guanylin is a 15-amino acid peptide hormone that was
`originally isolated from the jejunum of the rat small in•
`testine and shown to be an endogenous activator of the
`intestinal heat-stable enterotoxin receptor-guanylyl cy(cid:173)
`clase. Guanylin is synthesized as a 115-amino acid pro•
`hormone, proguanylin, which is processed at a site yet to
`be determined, into a C-terminal bioactive fragment(s).
`In order to examine the processing of proguanylin in
`vitro, we have generated large quantities of the properly
`folded prohormone by constructing an expression vec(cid:173)
`tor that directs its secretion into the periplasmic space
`of E•cherichia coli. The bacterially expressed human
`proguanylin was then processed to smaller C-terminal
`fragments by protease digestion. Digestion with trypsin
`or lysine-C generated C-terminal peptides of different
`length, which have been purified and characterized.
`Guanylin-22 and guanylin-32 have binding aff'mities and
`biological activities similar to guanylin-15, while gua(cid:173)
`nylin-68 and the entire proguanylin have only minimal
`bioactivity. Circular dichroism spectroscopy reveals
`that proguanylin is a stably folded protein containing
`mostly f:3-sheet and f:3-turn structure.
`
`called guanylin (Currie et al., 1992}. Guanylin shares struc(cid:173)
`tural similarities to STa, including 4 cysteine residues. Gua(cid:173)
`nylin is also able to compete for 1251-STa binding and stimulate
`cGMP production in cell lines expressing the STaR (Currie et
`al,, 1992; de Sauvage et al., 1992a). Recent cDNA cloning ex(cid:173)
`periments showed that guanylin is synthesized as a lO•kDa
`precursor called proguanylin (de Sauvage et al., 1992a; Wie(cid:173)
`gand et al., 1992; Schulz et al., 1992) (Fig. 4). Upon trypsin or
`acid treatment of proguanylin, a C-terminal fragment is re·
`leased that binds to and activates the STaR (de Sauvage et al.,
`1992a). While the site(s) of physiological processing is un(cid:173)
`known, there are several basic residues in proguanylin that
`could potentially fill this role.
`Functional studies aimed at determining the size of a gua(cid:173)
`nylin molecule with maximal activity require large quantities
`of the prohormone. Correct disulfide pairing of the 4 cysteines
`in the C-terminal fragment of proguanylin may require the
`membrane translocation of the entire molecule through the
`endoplasmic reticulum. Therefore, we have secreted the entire
`prohormone into the periplasm of E. coli. The soluble progua(cid:173)
`nylin has been purified and processed enzymatically and
`chemically to yield fully active mature hormone. Additionally,
`the high level expression has enabled us to begin structural
`characterization of both proguanylin and guanylin.
`
`Heat-stable enterotoxins (STa) 1 are small peptides of 18 or
`19 amino acids that are secreted into the intestine by entero(cid:173)
`toxigenic strains of Escherichia coli (Chan and Giannella,
`1981). The 13 amino acids necessary for the toxic activity of the
`peptide include 6 cysteines that form three disulfide bridges
`(Yoshimura et al., 1985). STa exerts its actions by binding and
`activating a member of the receptor-guanylyl cyclase family
`that is preferentially expressed in the intestine and is called
`the heat-stable enterotoxin receptor (STaR) (Schulz et al., 1990;
`de Sauvage et al., 1991). Binding of STa to STaR induces a
`dramatic increase of the cyclic guanine monophosphate (cGMP)
`content of the cell (Field et al., 1978; Hughes et al., 1978). The
`cGMP increase inhibits salt absorption and stimulates chloride
`secretion into the gut. The imbalance of ions is accompanied by
`a massive accumulation of water in the gut that gives rise to
`diarrhea and dehydration characteristic of enterotoxin activity.
`A search for an endogenous activator of STaR resulted in the
`isolation from the rat small intestine of a 15-amino acid peptide
`
`* The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the
`payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked
`uaduertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to
`indicate this fact.
`"" To whom correspondence should be addressed: Genentech Inc., 460
`Point San Bruno Blvd., South San Francisco, CA 94080. Tel.: 415-225-
`1081; Fax: 415-225-6127.
`1 The abbreviations used are: STa, heat-stable enterotoxin; STaR,
`heat-stable enterotoxin receptor; HPLC, high performance liquid chro(cid:173)
`matography; RP-HPLC, reverse-phase HPLC; PAGE, polyacrylamide
`gel electrophoresis; LC-MS, liquid chromatrography-mass spectrom(cid:173)
`etry; HIC, hydrophobic interaction chromatography.
`
`MATERIALS AND METHODS
`Vector Construction and Expression-The cD.NA encoding the 99-
`amino acid human proguanylin (de Sauvage et al., 1992a) was sub(cid:173)
`cloned into the expression vector pAK19 (Carter et al., 1992) following
`introduction by polymerase chain reaction of an Mlul site at its 5' end
`and an SphI site at its 3' end. pAK19 contains the E. coli alkaline
`phosphatase promoter, the heat-stable enterotoxin II (STII) Shine-Dal(cid:173)
`garno sequence, and sequence that encodes STU signal peptide. The 5'
`Mlul site places the proguanylin cDNA insert, minus its signal peptide,
`in frame with amino acid 23 of the STU signal peptide (Carter et al.,
`1992). The resulting expression construct, named pHPG2, was trans(cid:173)
`formed into competent E. coli strain W3110 ton A and grown overnight
`in Luria broth (LB) media supplemented with 50 µg/ml carbenicillin. At
`this point, induction media (final concentrations: 16.4 mM K2HPO4, 9.2
`mM NaH 2PO 4 , 47.4 mM (NH 4)zSO 4 , 3.7 mM sodium citrate, 22 mM KCl,
`7.7 mM MgSO4, 11 g/liter casein hydrolysate, and 11 g/liter yeast ex(cid:173)
`tract) was inoculated with the saturated culture at a ratio of 1 volume
`of saturated culture to 100 volumes of induction media and grown at
`37 °C for up to 32 h. Expression was checked by osmotically shocking
`the cell pellet contained in 1 ml of a 1 O.D. (A600) E. coli culture with 0.1
`volume of ice-cold H 2O, and analyzing protein content of the superna(cid:173)
`tant by 18% SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. Fermentations
`were carried out in 10-liter Biolaffitte fermentors.
`Proguanylin Purification-The media from the induced culture con(cid:173)
`tained substantial amounts of the expressed proguanylin, as did the
`periplasmic space of the induced E. coli. Tu purify the proguanylin in the
`periplasmic fraction, 100 g of cell paste was osmotically shocked by the
`addition of 500 ml of ice-cold distilled H 20 containing 10 mM EDTA
`(Carter et al., 1992). The suspension was stirred at 4 •c for 1 h, centri(cid:173)
`fuged at 5000 x g for 30 min, and the supernatant from the centrifu(cid:173)
`gation clarified by filtration through a 0.2-µm filter. The clarified su-
`22397
`
`This is an Open Access article under the CC BY license.
`
`Bausch Health Ireland Exhibit 2037, Page 1 of 5
`Mylan v. Bausch Health Ireland - IPR2022-00722
`
`

`

`22398
`
`Characterization n( Human Prnguanylm Expressed in E. coli
`
`pC'rnatanl wos nridified with 0.1',, Ltifluomcctic acid. brought to 15';
`aceL0111trilt•. and alluwed llJ sil ovl'rnighl at 4 "C. The turbid solution
`was ctintrifoged for 30 min at 5000 >< g, the supernatant filtered throngh
`:i 0.2-1101 filt<:r, and pumped onto a 105 Amicon CS 200 column 10.9 x 50
`cm> :1.l a flow rate uf 9 mVmi11. The column was w.ished with 15'}
`arctonitrile. f!.1 '1 t.rHluor:icct.ic acid 11ntil the ahsorhance base line
`lm e3surcd at 2 14 11w 1 reacbeu zcrv. 'l'be mtJbile phuse w>1s increasud LO
`a:)•;; :icetonitrile, and n grnd1en1 was nm from 33 to 48',, ocetronitrile
`OV('r 60 min. Fractions won• colll'cled at 1-min intervals. and s mall
`nllquoLS from each fraction w1,rt• analyzed hy r .. v .. rs~•phase !RP)-HP!.C
`column f 105 Amicon CS 1.6 x 250 mm) using an isocratic mobile phust•
`of 40'" acctonitrill', 0. 1 •·1 tnfluor11cctic acid_ Fracti(ms ,vere c,,11eeted
`nnd Jyophilized, a nd tht• composition was vi·nfit.'d by mass spcct1•ome1.ry
`arHI/Or puptide se(tUl.!ncing, Fnictions from the RP-HPLC t hat contained
`lhc correct peptide wi•rc pooled and further purified by hydrophobic
`,n1en1etion chromatography using a phenyl-Sepharose 1()/10 Pharma(cid:173)
`ciu FPLC column Buffer A wns50 m,1Na, Po,_ 2 M 1NH ,1,so •. pH"' 7.B:
`hufTer B wes 50 mM Na, PO, . pH : 7.8- A gradient of75'.! A to 25% Bat
`a flow rate oJ 1 ml/min el uted proguanylin al approx.imatdy 5or4 A. Thi!
`pure proguanylin peak was collected, d!!sahecl loy RP-HPl,C, and ly(cid:173)
`ophili:i:ed.
`1'o purify the proguonylin from the indnction media, the exact same
`procedure was followed as for the purilicaLion of the pcriplasmJc fra~•
`tion, except that no osmotic shock step wos neccss:iry and the media
`were acidified with 0.1 ~i trill uoracctic acid and hrought to )5r,; aceto•
`nitrile as the first step. Snhscqucnt s1.eps were the same us desc1ihed in
`the preceding parugmph f'or the periplasmic fracuon.
`1)ypsin Digest11,n rmd P1mficnt1nn- 2.5 mg of proguanylin m 0.1 M
`n,s-HC'I (pH 8.01 was incubated overnight at 37 C with 2<:: trypsin
`(w/w1 /Sigma l in a total reaction voluml' of 0.5 ml. 1'he total digei;t WRS
`injucted on a Sychron C<I (2 x 160 mm) column. Peptides were $eparated
`using a linear gradient of 0. 1 'ii trinuoracctic acid to 70% acetonitrile in
`30 min at a flow rate of0.2 ml/min. Peaks were detected by monitoring
`ahsorbancc al \!14 and 280 nm.
`l.,y.~111e-C D11Jrsti(111 am/ Pvri/it•c,/1011- For the complete digest, pro(cid:173)
`guanylin 12 nmolJ was digt:stcd with 5o/, lw/wl of Lys-C !Worthi ngton) in
`100 µl of O. L ~• 'Tns-llCI. 1p.H RO). al 37 C fur 17 h. For the partial
`digest. proguanyli11 (2 nmoll was digested with 5f{ (w/w l ofLys-C in 100
`r,I of(). I M l'l-is-HCl, (pH r:l,0/, at 23 •c for5 mir1. The Lys-C digests was
`injected on a Sychron <.:4 12 x 160 mm I column. Peptides were separated
`u!ring a linear gradient of0, 1''1- trinuoracetic acid lO 70% acetonilrile in
`30 min al a flow rate of 0.2 mVmin. Peaks were d<'lectcd by monitoring
`ollsorhance at 214 a nd 280 nm.
`M ass Spectrometr_v ond Peptid1• Sl!qtic11d1,g- Automated Edman
`degradation was performed on a model 477 Applied Biosystems Se(cid:173)
`quencer equipped with a 120A phenylthiohydantoin-derivalive ana•
`lyzer. Elertrospray spoctra were ohtAined on a Sciex APil tnple quad(cid:173)
`rapole mass spectrometer. Spectra were oblaincd by direct infusion al a
`now rate of 1.5 ml/min.
`1,;,'f-STu bindiog assays and guany(yl(cid:173)
`Bi11d111g and cGMP As$a_v-
`cyclase stimulation assays were performed using 29::1,STaR cells as
`described (de Sauvage rl (I/ .. 1991).
`C1rculor Dichroism- Circular clichroism ICD) spectra were obtained
`for proguru,ylin al 0.1 mg/ml in 10 m" NaC~CO~ tpH 6.0), Spectra
`were m1:asured from 250 to 190 nm tfar UV! in an Aviv/Cary 60-0S
`spcctropolarimeuir with the use of a 0.01-cm cell. Five scans were made
`uver the wavelength range al a time constant of 0.3 s. and the values
`were averaired. Spectra were corrected by subtraction of CD spectra
`obtained with buffer alone in the cell. Data arc reported as mean resi(cid:173)
`due ellipticity hy taking Ill g/mol as the mean residue molecular
`weight.
`
`RESULTS ANO DISCUSSION
`In order to genera te large quantities ofbioactive proguanylin
`for functional and s tructura l studies . we have expressed in E.
`roli a fusion protein consisting of the bacterial STH signal
`pe ptide and huma n proguanylin. It was hoped that the STll
`signal pe ptide would lea d to the translocation of the fusion
`protein thro ugh the inner bacterial membrane to the periplas(cid:173)
`m ic space. accompanied by cleavage of the STII signal pe ptide.
`Ther e a r e many examples where such membrane translocation
`t.o t he net oxidizing environment of the periplasm results in
`controlled and correct folding of proteins cont.aining mulLiple
`disulfide bonds tCarter et al., 1992; Stader and Silhavy. 1990).
`The S1'IJ-proguanylin fus ion protein is expressed unde r th e
`
`control of the E. coli alJtaline phos phatase prom oter, which is
`induced under conditions of' phosphate starvation . The media
`ar e designed so that phosphate is de pleted as the cells achieve
`a high de nsity, lea ding to incluction of this promoter. T he a d(cid:173)
`va ntage of this system is that ind uction occurs at a hig h cell
`density, and the expression of the protein is g radual enough
`that there is time for the STII fusion protein to be correctly
`trans!ocated to the periplas m (Carter el aL 1992). SOS-PAGE
`analyses of cell paste and supernata nt during a 10-liter fer(cid:173)
`m ent a tion are s hown in Fig. 1. The bacteria secreted progua(cid:173)
`nylin from about 12 t.o 32 h, a t which point, the induction was
`te rminated . S ubs lantially m ore proguanylin
`leaked out.
`through the cell membra ne into the supe rnatant (Fig. lA l than
`remained in the cells (Fig. 1B ). From a 10-liter fermentation,
`a pproximately 3,2 g of proguanylin were found in the 8 liter s of
`supernatant, and Q_5 g of proguanylin in lhe 1 kg of cell paste.
`The proguanylin was purified from both the induction media
`supernatant and the periplasmic fraction of the cell paste_ The
`periplasmic fraction is obtained by an osmotic (hypotonicl lysis
`of the E. coli. F or both the induct.ion media supernatant a nd the
`periplasmic fraction of the cell paste, a s ubstantial first-step
`purification was achieved by an acid precipitation followed by a
`151H acetonitrile precipitation. The proguanylin remains in the
`s upernatant. and is approximately 50% pure. as judged b.v
`HPLC. LC-MS analysis gave a molecular mass of 10,707 Da for
`the progua nylin. 1'his is the mass expected if the STIJ signal is
`propel'ly removed. The s upernatant of the acid-precipitated os(cid:173)
`motic s hock fraction was analyzed by analytical RP-HPLC (Fig.
`
`A) Supernatant
`
`Hours
`
`MW
`n<g O 3 6 9 12 IS 18 21 24 26 28 JO 32 std.
`
`43K
`29K
`
`18.4K
`14K
`- -Proguanylin
`6K
`3K
`
`8) Cell Pellet
`
`Hours
`MW
`neg O 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 26 28 30 32Std.
`
`43K
`29K
`18.4K
`14K
`;:- Proguanylin
`
`3K
`
`Pm. L Time course of induction and secretio n or proguanylin
`by E.coli. E. coli were transformed with plasmid pHPG2 and grown in
`a 10-lit.er fennentor as described under · Materials and Methods." Ali(cid:173)
`quots of media supernatant (.A) or cells \B > were removed and aualyzed
`by SOS-PAGE (181,i.1 at indicated intervals. Gel was stained wi.th Coo(cid:173)
`massie Blue. Negative control in far left. lane is f'or induced E. coli
`contai ning the expression vector Jacking the proguanyli.n cONA insert.
`
`Bausch Health Ireland Exhibit 2037, Page 2 of 5
`Mylan v. Bausch Health Ireland - IPR2022-00722
`
`

`

`Characterization of Human Proguanylin Expressed in E.coli
`
`22399
`
`2 ~ - - - - -n - - - - - - - - - - ,
`
`Proguanylin
`
`"'
`
`0
`~
`ci
`0
`
`2A) and the peak eluting at 40% acetonitrile was confirmed by
`LC-MS to be proguanylin. For preparative purification, 500 ml
`of the acid-precipitated osmotic shock supernatant (Fig. 2B) or
`!-liter batches of the acid-precipitated induction media (not
`shown) were loaded onto a preparative RP-HPLC and eluted
`with a gradient of 30---50% acetonitrile, 0.1 % trifluoracetic acid
`over 80 min. The proguanylin-containing fractions were deter(cid:173)
`mined by analytical RP-HPLC of fractions from the preparative
`column. An analytical RP-HPLC profile of the final proguanylin
`pool is shown in Fig. 2C.
`Although the proguanylin appeared to be >99% pure by RP(cid:173)
`HPLC, isocratic elution analysis of the material indicated a
`slight nongaussian shape to the peak. The only chromato(cid:173)
`graphic technique that was successful in separating contami(cid:173)
`nants from the proguanylin peak was hydrophobic interaction
`chromatography (HIC). The major eluting peak from the HIC
`column was proguanylin, but a number of contaminants were
`separated (Fig. 3).
`Proguanylin is inactive with respect to binding or activating
`
`Proguanylin +
`
`20
`
`40
`
`60
`
`80
`
`------
`
`--------
`
`---·-··J
`
`10
`
`20
`
`30
`
`40
`
`50
`
`60
`
`70
`
`80
`
`60
`
`0
`
`::e
`40 )>
`(")
`z
`
`20
`
`0.0
`
`450 A
`
`E 350
`C ..,.
`£ 250
`>
`E
`
`150
`
`50
`
`0
`
`B
`
`1.6
`
`C
`
`~
`
`E 1.2
`..,.
`~ 0.8
`::J
`<
`
`0.4
`
`100 C
`
`E 80
`C ..,.
`£ 60
`>
`E
`
`40
`
`20
`
`0
`
`20
`
`I
`80
`
`I
`I
`40
`60
`Time (minutes)
`FIG. 2. Reverse-phase high performance liquid chromatogra(cid:173)
`phy analysis and purification of proguanylin. The samples were
`chromatographed using an acetonitrile, 0.1% trifluoracetic acid gradi(cid:173)
`ent (33-48%) and a CS column as described under "Materials and Meth(cid:173)
`ods." A, analytical RP-HPLC of osmotic shock supernatant after acid
`precipitation. Column is a 105 Amicon CS 4.6 x 250 mm at 1 ml/min. B,
`preparative RP-HPLC of 500 ml of osmotic shock supernatant after acid
`precipitation. Proguanylin peak is highlighted. Mobile-phase gradient
`is indicated by the dashed line and scale at right. Column is a 105
`Amicon CS 200 column (0.9 x 50 cm) at a 9 ml/min flow rate. C, ana(cid:173)
`lytical RP-HPLC of purified proguanylin using a 105 Amicon CS column
`(4.6 x 250 mm). Absorbance for the indicated chromatograms was moni(cid:173)
`tored at 214 nm.
`
`. .,
`
`60
`
`40
`20
`Time (minutes)
`FIG. 3. Hydrophobic interaction chromatography of RP(cid:173)
`HPLC-purified proguanylin. Proguanylin peak is indicated by the
`arrow. Buffer A was 50 mM Na2PO4 , 2 M (NH4 )sSO4 (pH 7.8); buffer B
`was 50 mM Na2PO4 (pH 7.8). A gradient of75%Ato 25% Bat a flow rate
`of 1 ml/min eluted proguanylin at approximately 50% A. Absorbance
`was monitored at 214 nm.
`
`""; ·VJVQDGNFSFSL~_g)LQE~P,BVG!(.,BNFAPIPGEPVVPI-
`
`Guany9l-63 +
`
`Gu.-n,otin-32
`
`Guanylin-22
`
`LCSNPNFPEELJg'LC!EPNAQEILQ&LEEIAEDPGTCEICA Y MCTGC ·co;
`
`FIG. 4. Amino acid sequence of human proguanylin showing 3
`potential proteolytic processing sites. Guanylin-63, -32, and -22
`are the C-terrninal peptides that would result from cleavage at residues
`52, 83, and 93, respectively. Alternative basic amino acid residues that
`are possible processing sites are underlined.
`
`STaR (de Sauvage et al., 1992a; Schulz et al., 1992). Prohor(cid:173)
`mone processing enzymes are known to cleave primarily at
`dibasic residues, such as arginine and lysine (Barr, 1991). In
`order to study the biological activity of fragments of the mate(cid:173)
`rial purified from E. coli, proguanylin was completely or par(cid:173)
`tially digested with the proteases trypsin or lysine-C, respec(cid:173)
`tively. While these are not the physiological processing
`enzymes, they are convenient tools to generate smaller frag(cid:173)
`ments since they cleave at similar residues as most known
`processing enzymes. The cleavage sites from which fragments
`were generated for our studies are indicated in Fig. 4. Complete
`digestion of proguanylin with trypsin is expected to cleave at
`Arg-93 and yield a 22-amino acid C-terminal fragment. Com(cid:173)
`plete digestion with Lys-C is expected to yield a 32-amino acid
`C-terminal fragment resulting from cleavage at Lys-83. Partial
`digestion with lysine-C should also generate a 63-amino acid
`fragment resulting from cleavage at Lys-52 of proguanylin.
`The trypsin digestion was injected onto an RP-HPLC column
`(Fig. 5A), and the peaks were analyzed by mass spectrometry
`and amino acid analysis. The peak corresponding to the 22-
`amino acid fragment was re-injected onto the RP-HPLC and
`found to be homogeneous (Fig. 5B ). Mass spectrometry analysis
`indicates a molecular mass of 2258 Da as predicted for the
`completely oxidized peptide.
`The Lys-C digests were also analyzed by RP-HPLC (Fig. 6).
`After exhaustive digestion (17 h at 37 °C), a 32 amino acid
`fragment corresponding to residue Lys-83 of proguanylin was
`purified (Fig. 6A). After partial digestion (5 min at 23 °C), we
`could isolate a 63-amino acid C-terminal fragment resulting
`from cleavage at residue Lys-52 of proguanylin (Fig. 6B ). Both
`
`Bausch Health Ireland Exhibit 2037, Page 3 of 5
`Mylan v. Bausch Health Ireland - IPR2022-00722
`
`

`

`22400
`
`Characterization of Human Proguanylin Expressed in E.coli
`
`,.._Guanylin-22
`
`••w•
`
`80
`
`60
`
`;f.
`
`40 > (") z
`
`20
`
`0
`
`A
`
`100.----.-.~
`
`"0
`C :,
`0
`IXl
`;f.
`
`180 'A
`140
`
`100
`
`60
`
`~
`
`E i:: 20
`"'"
`£!.
`'B
`>
`E 70~
`
`60·
`
`50
`
`40
`
`30
`
`HlOO A
`
`1200
`
`::)
`<(
`E 800-
`
`400- ~
`
`0
`
`0
`
`2000 B
`
`1600
`
`::) 1200
`1
`
`800
`
`400
`
`0
`
`0
`
`.,.._ Guanylin-32
`
`5
`
`10
`
`..J ""
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`Guanylin-63-
`
`5
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`Time (minutes)
`FIG. 6. Lysine.C digest of purified proguaoylin. A, RP-HPLC of
`complete digest yielding a 32-amino acid fragment. B, RP-HPLC of
`partial digest yielding a 63-amino acid fragment. Details of the chro(cid:173)
`matography are identical to those described for guanylin-22 and are
`described under "Materials and Method!l."
`
`peptides were found to have the expected molecular mass.
`The ability of the purified 22-amino acid tryptic peptide (gua(cid:173)
`nylin-22) to compete with 1251-STa for binding to the STaR was
`measured using 293-STaR cells (de Sauvage et al., 1992b). As
`was found for guanylin-22 isolated from mammalian cells (de
`Sauvage et al., 1992a), 100 nM guanylin-22 was needed to dis(cid:173)
`place 50% of the bound 1251-STa (Fig. 7A). This result is also
`
`80
`
`0
`
`20
`
`40
`60
`Time (minutes)
`Fie. 5. Trypsin digest of purified proguaoylin. A, RP-HPLC of
`total trypsin digest. B, RP-HPLC of purified C-terminal 22 residue
`fragment. Peptides were separated using a linear gradient of 0.1%
`trifluoracetic acid to 70% acetonitrile in 30 min at a flow rate of 0.2
`mVmin on a Synchron C4 column. Other details of the chromatography
`are described under "Materials and Methods."
`
`o+-.~.,-~....,..~....,..~"'""C~~f-.--.........,
`.0001
`.001
`.01
`.1
`1
`10
`100
`[Guanylin](µM)
`
`B
`50
`
`40
`
`30
`
`20
`
`10
`
`0.,c;c=;c=~=::;:;:..,~~~....-~~-l
`.01
`.1
`10
`100
`
`fGuanvlinlhlMl
`Fm. 7. Functional analysis of guanylin-22. A, displacement of
`1251-STa by guanylin-22 from 293-STaR cells expressing STaR. Various
`concentrations of guanylin-22 were incubated with 25 pM125J-STa and 2
`x 105 293-STaR cells. Nonspecific binding was determined in the pres(cid:173)
`ence of a saturating concentration of guanylin-22 (5 µM). The percent
`specific binding is plotted versus the concentration of STa. Each point
`represents the mean of duplicate determinations. B, cGMP production
`stimulated by guanylin-22. 293-STaR cells were incubated with various
`concentrations of guanylin-22 for 30 min. Intracellular cGMP accumu(cid:173)
`lation was then determined as described (de Sauvage el al., 1991). Each
`point represents the mean of duplicate samples assayed in duplicate .
`
`1 2 0 r - - - - - - - - - - - - ,
`
`80
`
`-c
`C
`::,
`0
`tO
`~ 0
`40
`
`60
`
`20
`
`o Guanylin-22
`• Guanylin,32
`D Guanylin-ti3
`■ Proguanylin
`
`0
`,1
`
`100 1000 10000
`10
`[Peptide] (nM)
`F10. 8. Displacement of •••I-STa from 293-STaR cells by puri•
`fied guanylin-22, -32, and -68. Experiments were performed as in Fig.
`7. Individual curves are identified by the key in the inset.
`
`similar to the affinity measured for the 15-amino acid peptide
`generated by acid cleavage ofproguanylin (Currie et al., 1992).
`The ability of guanylin-22 to stimulate guanylyl cyclase activity
`was studied by incubating 293-STaR cells for 10 min in the
`presence of increasing concentrations of guanylin-22 and de(cid:173)
`termining the intracellular concentration of cGMP (Fig. 7B).
`An 80-fold stimulation was observed at 30 µM guanylin-22,
`where 49 pmol of cGMP/106 cells were measured. This level of
`stimulation is similar to the 150-fold stimulation measured
`with STa at 100 m.i (92 pmol of cGMP/106 cells) (de Sauvage et
`al., 1991).
`The discrepancy between the concentration of guanylin re(cid:173)
`quired for half-maximal cGMP elevation and the binding Kn is
`observed for all of the identified guanylyl cyclase receptors and
`is not yet understood (Schulz et al., 1989; de Sauvage et al.,
`
`Bausch Health Ireland Exhibit 2037, Page 4 of 5
`Mylan v. Bausch Health Ireland - IPR2022-00722
`
`

`

`Characterization of Human Proguanylin Expressed in E. coli
`
`22401
`
`ture (Fig. 9). The single minimum at 208 nm indicates strong
`(3-sheet and (3-turn structure, with negligible a-helix content.
`The minimum of the spectrum (208 nm) is shifted somewhat
`from classical {3-sheet (Yoshimura et al., 1985) CD minimum
`(218 nm), which is a reflection of short sheets connected by
`loops of random structure. Proguanylin is extremely proline(cid:173)
`rich, with 5-7 amino acid residues separating the prolines, so a
`general topological model might be one in which there are
`numerous short tJ-sheets connected by reverse turns compris(cid:173)
`ing prolines. Complete three-dimensional structure determina(cid:173)
`tion of the prohormone by NMR is under way, and should yield
`novel structural information on the role of the unprocessed,
`larger precursors of small peptide hormones.
`
`REFERENCES
`
`Nanometers
`FIG. 9. CD spectra of 0.1 mg/ml progu.anylin. Spectra were ob(cid:173)
`tained at pH 6.0 and 23 •c in 10 mM NaCH3C02. Recording of spectra
`is described under ~Materials and Methods."
`
`1991; Schulz et al., 1990).
`The two lysine-C-generated peptide fragments of progua(cid:173)
`nylin were compared to proguanylin and guanylin-22 in a 1251-
`STa competition binding assay (Fig. 8). The ability of gua(cid:173)
`nylin-32 to compete with 1251-STa for binding to 293-STaR cells
`is comparable to guanylin-22 (IC50 = 100 nM), whereas gua(cid:173)
`nylin-63 and intact proguanylin are far less effecUve (IC50 > 5
`µM). These results suggest that processing of proguanylin at
`sites located upstream from Lys-52 is not likely to generate an
`active hormone. Therefore, the dibasic Lys-Lys site that is con(cid:173)
`served between human and mouse at position 37-38 probably
`does not represent the physiological processing site of progua(cid:173)
`nylin.
`Very little is known about the structure of prohormones. We
`were interested to see whether the intact prohormone, progua(cid:173)
`nylin, folds into a molecule with stable and definable structure
`in aqueous solution. CD spectroscopy will yield information
`concerning whether the proguanylin is folded into definable
`secondary structural elements, or exists as an unstructured
`random coil. CD spectra on the intact E. coli expressed progua(cid:173)
`nylin indicates a folded molecule, which has secondary struc-
`
`Barr, P. J. (1991) Cell 66, 1-3
`Carter, P, Kelly, R. F., Rodrigues, M. L., Snedecor, B., Covarubias, M., Velligan, M.
`D., Wong, W. L. T., Rowland,A. M., Kotts, C. E., Carver, M. E., Yang, :M., Bourell,
`J. H., Shepard, H. M., and Henner, D. (1992) Bio'Il!chn.owgy 10, 163-167
`Chan, S. K., and Giannella, R. A. 0981) J. Biol. Chem. 200, 77 44-77 46
`Currie, M. G., Fok, K. F., Kato, J., Moore, R. J., Hamra, F. K., Duffin, K. L., and
`Smith, C. E. U992) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S. A. 89, 947-951
`de Sauvage, F. J., Camerato, T. R., and Goedde), D. V. (1991) J. Biol. Chem. 266,
`17912-17918
`de Sauvage, F. J., Keshav, S., Kuang, W..J., Gillett, N., Henzel, W., and Goeddel, D.
`V. (1992a) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 89, 9089-9093
`de Sauvage, F. J., Horulr., R., Bennett, G., Quan, C., Burnier, J. P, and Goedde!, D.
`V. (1992bl J. Biol. Chem. 267, 6479--648Z
`Field, M., Graf, L. H., Laird, W. J., and Smith, P. L. (1978) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.
`u. s. A. 111, 2800-2804
`Hughes, J. M., Murad, F., Chang, B., and Guerrant, R. L. (1978) Nature 211,
`755--756
`Se.xena, V. P, and Wetlaufer, D. B. (1971) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S. A. 66,
`969--972
`Schulz, S., Singh, S., Bellet, R. A., Singh, G., Tubb, D. J., Chin, H., and Garbers, D.
`L. (1989) Cell 118, 1155--1162
`Schulz, S., Green, C. K., Yuen, P. S. T., and Garbers, D. L. 0990) Ce/I 63, 941-948
`Schulz, S., Chrisman, T. D., and Garbers, D. L. (1992) J. Biol. Chem. 261, 16019-
`16021
`Stader, J. A., and Silhavy, T. J. (1990) Methods Enzymol. Ul5, 166-187
`Wiegand, R. C., Kato, J., Currie, M. G., (1992) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
`185, 812-817
`Yoshimura, S., Ikamura, H., Watanabe, H., Aimoto, S., Shimonishi, Y., Hara, S.,
`Takeda, T., Miwatani, T., and Takeda, Y. /1985) FEBS Lett. 181, 138--142
`
`Bausch Health Ireland Exhibit 2037, Page 5 of 5
`Mylan v. Bausch Health Ireland - IPR2022-00722
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket