throbber
From: Hasford, Justin <Justin.Hasford@finnegan.com>
`Sent: Wednesday, July 20, 2022 3:04 PM
`To: Trials <Trials@USPTO.GOV>
`Cc: Diner, Bryan <bryan.diner@finnegan.com>; Kim, Kyu Yun <KyuYun.Kim@finnegan.com>; Eaddy,
`Geneva <Geneva.Eaddy@finnegan.com>; Mills, Jad <jmills@wsgr.com>; Torczon, Richard (External)
`<rtorczon@wsgr.com>; EXT- nstafford@wsgr.com <nstafford@wsgr.com>; Gregory, Dennis
`<dgregory@wsgr.com>; Winschel, Grace <gwinschel@wsgr.com>
`Subject: IPR2022-00722
`
`CAUTION: This email has originated from a source outside of USPTO. PLEASE CONSIDER THE SOURCE before
`responding, clicking on links, or opening attachments.
`
`To the Board:
`
`
`Counsel for Patent Owner and Petitioner in the above-captioned IPR each approach the Board for
`certain relief about which the parties have met and conferred.
`
`
`Patent Owner respectfully seeks authorization to move to strike Petitioner’s Updated Mandatory
`Notices (Paper No. 9) submitted on July 11, 2022, for failing to comply with Rule 42.8(a)(3), and
`Petitioner opposes.
`
`
`Patent Owner hereby withdraws its request for the Board to deny institution based on parallel litigation
`(inclusive of Section II, pages 14-26, of the preliminary response, Paper No. 6). Patent Owner requests
`authorization to file a replacement version of Paper No. 6 that redacts Section II as well as these
`arguments from the remainder of the preliminary response (without adding any replacement
`material). Petitioner joins the request.
`
`
`Petitioner respectfully requests pre-institution reply briefing. Petitioner requests 5 pages to respond to
`Patent Owner’s 35 U.S.C. §325(d) and RPI arguments, with Patent Owner being afforded a sur-reply of
`equal length. Patent Owner is willing to agree to reply briefing as long as Petitioner refrains from
`addressing the substantive merits of the case in its reply. Petitioner believes that some merits issues are
`integral to the §325(d) arguments, making a restriction on how it may address §325(d) unduly
`prejudicial to Petitioner, and Patent Owner disagrees.
`
`
`Patent Owner and Petitioner are both available for a teleconference with the Board at the following
`times:
`
`
`• Tuesday, July 26th – any time between 2:00 pm ET and 4:00 pm ET
`• Wednesday, July 27th – any time between 2:00 pm ET and 4:00 pm ET
`• Thursday, July 28th – any time between 2:00 pm ET and 4:00 pm ET
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`Justin Hasford
`
`Justin J. Hasford |
`
`

`

`901 New York Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20001-4413
`+1 202 408 4000 | fax +1 202 408 4400 | justin.hasford@finnegan.com
`www.finnegan.com | LinkedIn Profile | Finnegan AIA Blog
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`This e-mail message is intended only for individual(s) to whom it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged, confidential,
`proprietary, or otherwise exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you believe you have received this message in error, please advise
`the sender by return e-mail and delete it from your mailbox. Thank you.
`
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket