throbber
Opossum colonic mucosa contains uroguanylin
`and guanylin peptides
`
`F. KENT HAMRA, WILLIAM J. KRAUSE, SAMMY L. EBER, RONALD H. FREEMAN,
`CHRISTINE E. SMITH, MARK G. CURRIE, AND LEONARD R. FORTE
`The Truman Veterans Affairs Medical Center and Departments of Pharmacology, Anatomy,
`and Physiology, School of Medicine, Missouri University, Columbia 65212;
`and Searle Research and Development, St. Louis, Missouri 63167
`
`Hamra, F. Kent, William J. Krause, Sammy L. Eber,
`Ronald H. Freeman, Christine E. Smith, Mark G. Cur-
`rie, and Leonard R. Forte. Opossum colonic mucosa con-
`tains uroguanylin and guanylin peptides. Am. J. Physiol. 270
`(Gastrointest. Liver Physiol. 33): G708—G716, 1996.—Urogua-
`nylin and guanylin are structurally related peptides that
`activate an intestinal form of membrane guanylate cyclase
`(GC-C). Guanylin was isolated from the intestine, but urogua-
`nylin was isolated from urine, thus a tissue source for
`uroguanylin was sought. In these experiments, uroguanylin
`and guanylin were separated and purified independently
`from colonic mucosa and urine of opossums. Colonic, urinary,
`and synthetic forms of uroguanylin had an isoelectric point of
`--3.0, eluted from C18 reverse-phase high-performance liquid
`chromatography (RP-HPLC) columns at 8-9% acetonitrile,
`elicited greater guanosine 3',5'-cyclic monophosphate (cGMP)
`responses in T84 cells at pH 5.5 than pH 8, and were not
`cleaved and inactivated by pretreatment with chymotrypsin.
`In contrast, colonic, urinary, and synthetic guanylin had an
`isoelectric point of -6.0, eluted at 15-16% acetonitrile on C18
`RP-HPLC columns, stimulated greater cGMP responses in
`T84 cells at pH 8 than pH 5.5, and were inactivated by
`chymotrypsin, which hydrolyzed the Phe-Ala or Tyr-Ala
`bonds within guanylin. Uroguanylin joins guanylin as an
`intestinal peptide that may participate in an intrinsic path-
`way for cGMP-mediated regulation of intestinal salt and
`water transport. Moreover, uroguanylin and guanylin in
`urine may be derived from the intestinal mucosa, thus
`implicating these peptides in an endocrine mechanism link-
`ing the intestine with the kidney.
`guanylate cyclase; TS4 cells; guanosine 3',5'-cyclic monophos-
`phate; urine
`
`UROGUANYLIN AND GUANYLIN are members of an emerg-
`ing family of peptides that function as the physiological
`ligands for an intestinal isoform of membrane guanyl-
`ate cyclase (GC-C) (7, 18; see Ref. 13 for review).
`Uroguanylin and guanylin stimulate GC-C activity,
`resulting in elevations of cellular guanosine 3',5'-cyclic
`monophosphate (cGMP) (7, 18). All species of mammals
`and birds examined express GC-C-like receptor activity
`on the apical surface of enterocytes throughout the
`intestine (21, 22). The opossum kidney also expresses
`high levels of GC-C-like receptors located in the apical
`membranes of proximal tubular cells (14). Guanylin
`was first isolated from rat jejunum as a heat-stable,
`15-amino acid peptide that activated GC-C in human
`intestinal T84 cells (7). Guanylin cDNAs encoding 115-
`to 116-amino acid precursors have been isolated from
`rat, human, and mouse intestine (19). Uroguanylin was
`initially purified as 13- to 15-amino acid peptides from
`
`opossum urine (18) and was named on the basis of its
`structural and functional similarities to guanylin and
`its isolation from urine. Uroguanylin was confirmed as a
`second member in the guanylin peptide family by the
`subsequent isolation of opossum guanylin (18) and the
`human and rat forms of uroguanylin (10, 20).
`Before the discovery of guanylin and uroguanylin,
`the only peptide agonists for GC-C were the diarrhea-
`producing, heat-stable enterotoxins (STs) (11, 34). STs
`are produced by different strains of pathogenic, enteric
`microorganisms, including Escherichia coli (25). STs
`act as molecular mimics of guanylin and uroguanylin
`by binding to GC-C and stimulating dramatic increases
`in cellular cGMP accumulation (11, 13, 31). ST-
`stimulated cGMP production decreases sodium absorp-
`tion and increases chloride secretion by enterocytes,
`which results in secretory, or "traveler's," diarrhea (11,
`25, 31). Similar to STs, uroguanylin and guanylin
`stimulate transepithelial chloride secretion from T84
`cells and intestinal tissues mounted in Ussing cham-
`bers by increasing cellular cGMP production (7, 18, 20).
`Thus previous studies of the mechanisms by which STs
`exert their pathological effects may provide insights
`into the physiological roles of uroguanylin and gua-
`nylin.
`Guanylin mRNA is found throughout the intestine,
`with the highest levels of expression in the ileum and
`colon (20). Guanylin and/or its mRNA has been re-
`ported to occur in a heterogeneous population of intesti-
`nal cell types, including absorptive enterocytes (27),
`Paneth cells (9), enterochromaffin cells (4), and goblet
`cells (6). Northern analysis has also demonstrated
`lower levels of guanylin mRNA in the kidney, adrenal
`gland, and the uterus/oviduct (33). Moreover, progua-
`nylin has been shown to circulate in the plasma of
`humans, demonstrating that guanylin may potentially
`regulate GC-C or other target receptors via an endo-
`crine mechanism (23, 24, 30). Presently, uroguanylin
`has only been isolated from urine, and little is known
`regarding the tissues that may produce this peptide
`(10, 18, 20). The high levels of uroguanylin found in the
`urine of opossums, humans, and rats could be derived
`from the kidney and/or from other tissues via filtration
`of uroguanylin from the circulation. In the current
`study, we have isolated uroguanylin and guanylin
`peptides from the colonic mucosa of opossums. Several
`independent analytical techniques were used to iden-
`tify the bioactive peptides. Thus intestinal mucosa is a
`potential tissue source for uroguanylin and guanylin
`found in urine (10, 18, 20).
`
`G708
`
`0193-1857/96 $5.00 Copyright © 1996 the American Physiological Society
`
`MYLAN EXHIBIT - 1019 (Corrected)
`Mylan Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Bausch Health Ireland, Ltd.
`
`

`

`UROGUANYLIN: AN INTESTINAL PEPTIDE
`
`G709
`
`MATERIALS AND METHODS
`
`Purification of colon peptides. Full-length colons, including
`cecums, were removed from adult opossums (Didelphis virgin-
`iana), and the mucosae (150 g wet wt) were scraped from
`colonic muscle with the use of a glass microscope slide. Only
`healthy opossums with hard stools were used in these stud-
`ies. The mucosae were divided into two batches, which were
`processed separately (75 g wet wt/batch). Each batch was
`suspended in 10 vol of 1 M acetic acid, heated at 100°C for 10
`min with constant stirring, homogenized, and stored at
`—20°C. The homogenate was thawed and centrifuged at
`10,000 g for 20 min, and the supernatant was made to 0.1%
`trifluoroacetic acid (TFA). The supernatants were processed
`with Waters Sep-Pak cartridges [octadecylsilane cartridges
`(C18)] as described previously (7, 18). Eluted fractions of the
`colon extract from C18 cartridges were dried in a Speed-Vac,
`resuspended in 10 ml of 25 mM ammonium acetate, pH 5.0,
`and centrifuged at 500 g for 10 min. From each batch, 8.0 ml
`of supernatant were applied to a 2.5 X 90 cm Sephadex G-25
`column, and 10-ml fractions were collected for two successive
`runs. Fractions from this step and subsequent purification
`steps were assayed for bioactivity as described in cGMP
`accumulation assay in T84 cells. Bioactive fractions from
`each batch were combined after the Sephadex G-25 step.
`Final purification by isoelectric focusing on a Rotofor appara-
`tus (Bio-Rad) and reverse-phase high-performance liquid
`chromatography (RP-HPLC) of individual uroguanylin-like
`or guanylin-like bioactive peptides was achieved using the
`same purification scheme as described previously for isolation
`of intestinal peptides from the opossum and rat (7, 18). An
`ampholyte range of pH 3.0 to 10.0 (Bio-Rad) was used for
`isoelectric focusing.
`Purification of urine peptides. Uroguanylin and guanylin
`peptides were extracted from 4.5 liters of opossum urine and
`purified as previously described, except that an isoelectric
`focusing step was added after the semipreparative HPLC step
`(18). Active fractions were identified using the bioassay as
`described below. Separate columns and Rotofor apparatus
`materials were used during purification of urine peptides
`than were used for purification of the colon peptides.
`Cell culture. T84 cells (passage 21 obtained from Jim
`McRoberts, Harbor-University of California Los Angeles Medi-
`cal Center, Torrance, CA) were cultured in Dulbecco's modi-
`fied Eagle's medium (DMEM)-Ham's F-12 medium (1:1) con-
`taining 5% fetal bovine serum, 60 pg penicillin, and 100 pg
`streptomycin per milliliter as previously described (18).
`cGMP accumulation assay in T84 cells. T84 cells were
`cultured in 24-well plastic dishes, and the cGMP levels were
`measured in control and agonist-stimulated cells by radioim-
`munoassay (18). Aliquots of column fractions and vehicle
`were suspended in 200 pl of each of two assay buffers: pH 8.0
`buffer, consisting of DMEM, 20 mM N-2-hydroxyethylpipera-
`zine-N'-2-ethanesulfonic acid (HEPES), 50 mM sodium bicar-
`bonate, pH 8.0, and 1 mM 3-isobutyl-1-methylxanthine
`(IBMX); and pH 5.5 buffer, consisting of DMEM, 20 mM
`2-(N-morpholino)ethanesulfonic acid (MES), pH 5.5, and 1
`mM IBMX. Ammonium acetate and TFA were removed from
`test samples by drying fraction aliquots in a Speed-Vac before
`suspension in assay buffers. This was done to avoid changes
`in pH caused by the column reagents. T84 cells were washed
`twice with 200 pl of the respective pH 8.0 and pH 5.5 buffers
`before addition of reagents. These solutions of medium plus
`bioactive peptides were then added to T84 cells and incubated
`at 37°C for 40 min. After incubation, the reaction medium was
`aspirated, and 200 pl of 3.3% perchloric acid was added per
`well to stop the reaction and extract cGMP. The extract was
`
`adjusted to pH 7.0 with potassium hydroxide and centrifuged,
`and 50 pl of the extract was used to measure cGMP. For pH
`titration studies, DMEM, 20 mM HEPES, 1 mM IBMX was
`adjusted to pH 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, and 8.5 with NaOH, and DMEM,
`20 mM MES, 1 mM IBMX was adjusted to pH 5.0, 5.5, 6.0,
`and 6.5 with NaOH.
`Peptide-agonist concentration-response curves were ana-
`lyzed with the computer program Prism (GraphPad Software,
`San Diego, CA). The concentrations at which peptide agonists
`elicited 50% of the maximal cGMP accumulation response
`(EC50) were obtained by nonlinear regression of agonist-
`stimulated cGMP accumulation data.
`Synthesis of uroguanylin, guanylin, and ST peptides. Syn-
`thetic uroguanylin-(2-15), EDCELCINVACTGC, and syn-
`thetic guanylin-(1-15), SHTCEICAFAACAGC, were synthe-
`sized by the solid-phase method with an Applied Biosystems
`431A peptide synthesizer. N-(9-fluorenylmethoxycarbonyl)
`(FMOC)-protected amino acids activated with 2-(1H-benzo-
`triazol-1-yl)-1,1,3,3-tetramethyluronium hexafluorophosphate
`were added to FMOC-Cys-(trityl)-Wang resin (Nova Bio-
`chem). Coupling efficiencies were monitored by the ultravio-
`let absorbance of the released FMOC groups. The peptides
`were cleaved from the resin, and the side chains were
`deprotected, except for the acetamidomethyl groups on Cys3
`and Cysil, by incubation in TFA, ethanedithiol, and water
`(95:2.5:2.5, vol/vol) for 2 h at room temperature. The peptides
`were cyclized with the use of air oxidation. The acetamido-
`methyl groups on Cys3 and Cysll were removed with iodine.
`The peptides were desalted with a 12-ml Whatman ODS-3
`solid-phase extraction device and purified to a single peak by
`C18 RP-HPLC (acetonitrile-ammonium acetate). The se-
`quences of uroguanylin and guanylin were confirmed by
`protein sequencing on an Applied Biosystems 470A gas-phase
`protein sequencer. Amino acid composition analysis was
`performed to estimate peptide mass, after RP-HPLC purifica-
`tion.
`E. coli ST-(5-17), CCELCCNPACAGC, was prepared as
`previously described by the solid-phase method with an
`Applied Biosystems 430A peptide synthesizer on Cys-(4-
`CH3Bz1)-OCH2-Pam resin, using double coupling cycles to
`ensure complete coupling at each step (6). The peptide was
`cyclized with the use of dimethyl sulfoxide, and its structure
`was verified by electrospray mass spectrometry, gas-phase
`sequence analysis, and amino acid composition analysis (7).
`Synthesis, purification, and composition analysis of rat
`guanylin-(101-115), rat guanylin-(93-115), and human uro-
`guanylin were performed by our previously described meth-
`ods (7, 20).
`Chymotrypsin digestion of peptides. Vehicle, synthetic pep-
`tides, or purified peptides were separated into aliquots in
`Microfuge tubes and dried in a Speed-Vac. Digestion reac-
`tions were started by resuspending the dried aliquots in 100
`pl of 10 mM HEPES, pH 8.0, containing 0.15 U (3 pg solid) of
`bovine pancreatic a-chymotrypsin (Sigma, St. Louis, MO),
`either with or without 100 pM chymostatin (Sigma). Reac-
`tions were incubated at 34°C in a water bath for 1 h. After 1 h,
`the reaction tubes were placed on ice, 100 pM chymostatin
`was added to the reactions that had been incubated in the
`absence of chymostatin, and all the tubes were frozen at
`—80°C. After freezing, the reaction mixtures were dried in a
`Speed-Vac and then resuspended in 200 pl of DMEM contain-
`ing 50 mM sodium bicarbonate (pH 8.0) and 1 mM IBMX for
`analysis in the T84 cell cGMP accumulation bioassay. The
`same experiments were repeated and confirmed with sequenc-
`ing-grade bovine pancreatic chymotrypsin from a second
`source (Boehringer-Mannheim, Indianapolis, IN).
`
`

`

`G710
`
`UROGUANYLIN: AN INTESTINAL PEPTIDE
`
`pmol cGMP per well
`
`For NH2-terminal sequence analysis of digested peptides,
`400 pmol of synthetic opossum uroguanylin, synthetic opos-
`sum guanylin, and synthetic rat guanylin-(101-115) were
`incubated for 10 h at 34°C in a Microfuge tube containing 50
`µl of 10 mM HEPES, pH 8.0, with either 20 or 200 pmol of
`bovine pancreatic a-chymotrypsin (sequencing grade, Boeh-
`ringer-Mannheim).
`
`RESULTS
`
`Selective bioassay for uroguanylin and guanylin pep-
`tides. During the initial isolation of uroguanylin and
`guanylin peptides, we observed that a reduction in
`medium pH reduced the cGMP response elicited by
`guanylin in T84 cells. In contrast, uroguanylin was less
`sensitive to changes in pH. To further investigate these
`observations, the effects of medium pH on the cGMP
`responses elicited by 30 nM of the synthetic forms of
`opossum uroguanylin and guanylin in T84 cells were
`examined (Fig. 1). Uroguanylin caused a greater in-
`crease in cellular cGMP levels when assayed at pH 5
`compared with pH 8. In contrast, guanylin caused only
`a doubling in cGMP accumulation above basal levels at
`pH 5, with the cGMP response increasing to 13-fold at
`pH 8 (Fig. 1). Results obtained with 3 nM E. coli
`ST-(5-17) were similar to those obtained with 30 nM
`uroguanylin (data not shown). Synthetic rat guanylin,
`like opossum guanylin, elicited greater cGMP re-
`sponses in T84 cells at pH 8 than at pH 5.5 (Fig. 2).
`Moreover, the synthetic form of human uroguanylin
`was like opossum uroguanylin and E. coli ST-(5-17) in
`that each peptide stimulated greater levels of cGMP
`accumulation in T84 cells at acidic relative to alkaline
`pH (Fig. 2). These experiments defined pH conditions
`that were used to estimate the potencies of these
`
`120 —
`
`a 100 -
`'a
`co c
`.5 a
`cr
`vTo
`< E 74
`a.
`•
`
`80 -
`
`60
`
`7,,
`
`40
`
`20
`
`0
`
`5.0
`
`5.5 6.0
`
`7.0
`
`7.5 8.0
`
`6.5
`pH
`Fig. 1. Effects of medium pH on uroguanylin (O) and guanylin
`(1)-stimulated guanosine 3' ,5' -cyclic monophosphate (cGMP) accumu-
`lation in T84 cells. Vehicle, 30 nM synthetic opossum uroguanylin,
`and 30 nM synthetic opossum guanylin were suspended in buffered
`assay medium previously adjusted to pH values indicated, as de-
`scribed in MATERIALS AND METHODS. Levels of T84 cell cGMP accumula-
`tion (pmol/well, average of 3 wells) elicited by vehicle and peptides in
`this experiment when tested at pH 5.0 and pH 8.0, respectively, were
`as follows: basal (vehicle control) = 0.45 and 0.78, uroguanylin = 43.9
`and 17.5, and guanylin = 0.85 and 10.0. Data are representative of 4
`experiments with similar results.
`
`80
`
`70 -
`
`60 -
`
`50 -
`
`40 -
`
`30 -
`
`T
`
`20 -
`
`10 - 1
`
`Basal
`
`ST
`
`I-
`opUGn huUGn
`
`rGn
`
`opGn
`
`Fig. 2. Agonist-stimulated cGMP accumulation in T84 cells at pH 5.5
`(open bars) and pH 8.0 (solid bars). Peptides and vehicle were
`suspended in HEPES and Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium
`(DMEM) containing 50 mM sodium bicarbonate (pH 8.0), or 2-(N-
`morpholino)ethanesulfonic acid (MES) and DMEM at pH 5.5 (pH 5.5)
`for analysis in the T84 cell cGMP accumulation bioassay. Basal,
`vehicle control; ST, synthetic E. coli ST-(5-17); opGn, synthetic
`opossum guanylin; opUGn, synthetic opossum uroguanylin; huUGn,
`synthetic human uroguanylin; rGn, synthetic rat guanylin-(101-
`115). All peptides were tested at 30 nM except for E. coli ST-(5-17),
`which was tested at 3 nM. Error bars indicate standard error of the
`mean for 3 experiments.
`
`peptide agonists. Uroguanylin was more potent at pH
`5.5 (EC50, 200 i 50 nM, n = 5) than at pH 8 (EC50,
`1,900 ± 100 nM, n = 5) (Fig. 3). In contrast, guanylin
`was less potent at pH 5.5 (EC50, 10.6 ± 4.2 pM, n = 3)
`than at pH 8 (EC50, 0.68 ± 0.1 pM, n = 3). ST-(5-17)
`appeared similar in potency at both pH 5.5 (EC50, 40 ±
`10 nM, n = 3) and pH 8 (EC50, 130 ± 60 nM, n = 3).
`Interestingly, the rank order of potency of ST > urogua-
`nylin > guanylin at pH 5.5 changed to ST > guanylin >
`uroguanylin at pH 8 in the T84 cell bioassay. These
`results demonstrate that guanylin-selective and urogua-
`nylin-selective pH conditions can be used to identify
`these peptides.
`Comparison of cGMP responses to endogenous and
`synthetic peptides. To demonstrate that the selective
`bioassay conditions using synthetic uroguanylin and
`guanylin could be extended to endogenous uroguanylin
`and guanylin, we isolated bioactive peptides from opos-
`sum urine, which contains greater levels of urogua-
`nylin than guanylin (10, 18, 20). At each stage of
`purification before the isoelectric focusing step, the
`urine extracts elicited much larger cGMP responses in
`T84 cells at pH 5.5 compared with the cGMP responses
`at pH 8 (data not shown). The bioactivity profile
`obtained using preparative isoelectric focusing of the
`partially purified urine extract revealed a dominant
`peak of bioactivity migrating with a pl of about 3.0
`(peak 1, Fig. 4). This pI is similar to that of the
`uroguanylin peptides previously isolated from urine,
`which contained two or three acidic amino acids and no
`basic residues (18). The bioactive components in peak 1
`also elicited greater cGMP responses in T84 cells when
`assayed at pH 5.5 than at pH 8. A small amount of
`
`

`

`UROGUANYLIN: AN INTESTINAL PEPTIDE
`
`G711
`
`assayed at pH 5.5 revealed two distinct peaks of
`bioactivity that eluted within the internal volume of
`the Sephadex G-25 gel column (Fig. 5). When the
`column fractions were assayed at pH 8, a single peak of
`bioactivity was observed that was coincident with the
`peak 2 that was found when the assay was conducted at
`pH 5.5. The uroguanylin-like peptides in peak 1 elicited
`27-fold increases in cellular cGMP accumulation when
`Qcnyprl at pT-T Fl Fl and nnly fivPfnld inrroaQPQ in etalliiinr
`cGMP at pH 8. In contrast, the guanylin-like peptides
`in peak 2 stimulated greater levels of cGMP at pH 8
`(100-fold) than when assayed at pH 5.5 (28-fold).
`To further characterize the uroguanylin-like pep-
`tides, the components of peak 1 were purified as
`previously described (7, 18). After each purification
`step, a dominant activity peak was observed that
`elicited greater cGMP responses at pH 5.5 than at pH 8.
`In addition, a pI of 3.0 was observed when the bioactive
`components from peak 1 were fractionated by prepara-
`tive isoelectric focusing (data not shown), consistent
`with peak I containing an acidic, uroguanylin-like
`peptide (10, 18, 20). The chromatographic properties of
`peak 1 were characterized further with the use of
`RP-HPLC. The peak fraction of bioactive peptides
`eluting from a C18 RP-HPLC column stimulated a
`23-fold increase in cGMP when assayed at pH 5.5,
`compared with only an eightfold increase in cGMP at
`pH 8 (Fig. 6). Moreover, a characteristic uroguanylin
`elution profile (18) was observed, with the uroguanylin-
`like peptide(s) eluting at 8% acetonitrile from this C18
`RP-HPLC column (Fig. 6). This elution pattern is
`
`12
`
`• •
`
`- 10
`
`-
`
`6
`
`- 4
`
`2
`
`Peak #2
`
`30
`
`25 -
`
`Peak #1
`0
`
`20
`
`15
`
`10 -
`
`5 -
`
`0
`
`pmol cGMP per well
`
`15
`
`18
`
`3
`
`6
`
`12
`9
`Fraction
`Fig. 4. Isoelectric focusing of peptides extracted from opossum urine.
`Peptides were extracted from 4.5 liters of opossum urine using C18
`cartridges and purified as described in MATERIALS AND METHODS.
`Purified peptides were suspended in 50 ml water containing 0.8%
`ampholytes (pH range 3-10, Bio-Rad) and then fractionated on a
`preparative isoelectric focusing cell (Rotofor, Bio-Rad). Fractions
`(0.2% of fraction volume) were next assayed for the ability to elicit a
`cGMP response in T84 cells after suspension in MES, DMEM at pH
`5.5 (0), and in HEPES, DMEM adjusted to pH 8.0 with 50 mM
`sodium bicarbonate (I). Right y-axis represents pH (•) of Rotofor
`fractions obtained after isoelectric focusing of partially purified
`peptides. pH of the Rotofor fraction containing peak of bioactivity, as
`determined by T84 cell cGMP accumulation bioassay, was estimated
`as the isoelectric point (pI).
`
`1000 g A
`
`100 r
`
`10r
`
`1
`
`1000 B
`
`a)
`
`100
`
`10 r
`
`o_
`a.
`2
`
`1000 r c I
`
`100 r
`
`10 r
`
`0
`
`0
`
`ee 2
`
`4
`
`1
`
`0
`
`6 5
`10 9 8 7
`-log Peptide [M]
`Fig. 3. Concentration-response curves for stimulation of cGMP accu-
`mulation in T84 cells by synthetic opossum uroguanylin (A), syn-
`thetic opossum guanylin (B), and synthetic E. coli ST-(5-17) (C).
`Peptides were suspended in MES, DMEM at pH 5.5 (pH 5.5) and in
`HEPES, DMEM adjusted to pH 8.0 with 50 mM sodium bicarbonate
`(pH 8.0). Data are representative of 3-5 experiments with each
`agonist at both pH 5.5 (0) and pH 8.0 (•).
`
`guanylin-like activity was also observed migrating
`with a pI of 5.2 (peak 2, Fig. 4), similar to the pI of
`opossum guanylin, which contains one histidine (18).
`The guanylin-like peptide stimulated a fourfold in-
`crease in cellular cGMP when assayed at pH 8, with no
`detectable increase in cGMP at pH 5.5. These experi-
`ments confirmed that endogenous uroguanylin and
`guanylin peptides respond similarly to the synthetic
`forms of uroguanylin and guanylin when assayed for
`the ability to elicit cGMP responses at acidic vs. alka-
`line pH in T84 cells.
`Isolation of uroguanylin and guanylin from colonic
`mucosa. Preliminary examination of extracts from co-
`lonic mucosa, full-length small intestinal mucosa, kid-
`ney, and plasma of the opossum revealed the presence
`of both uroguanylin-like and guanylin-like peptides in
`each of the extracts (data not shown). Because the
`amounts of extracted uroguanylin-like bioactivity in
`colonic mucosa appeared to be the greatest per gram
`wet weight of tissue, we further characterized the
`peptides from this tissue. Bioactive peptides were
`extracted from 150 g of opossum colonic mucosa and
`fractionated by gel-filtration chromatography. The pro-
`file of bioactivity obtained when column fractions were
`
`.................
`

`

`Peak #2
`
`Peak #1
`
`LI
`•O
`
`•
`
`G712
`
`25
`
`20 -
`
`15 -
`
`1 0
`
`5
`
`pmol cGMP per well
`
`UROGUANYLIN: AN INTESTINAL PEPTIDE
`
`sequence analysis, no signal for amino acids was ob-
`served, indicating that this peptide may be blocked at
`the NH2-terminal end, a phenomenon previously en-
`countered when uroguanylin was purified from urine.
`To evaluate the bioactive components contained in
`peak 2 (Fig. 5), the same purification methods were
`utilized. When the components of peak 2 were further
`purified by isoelectric focusing, both guanylin-like and
`rmrsi-;r1 no AxIcr•cl moo nlxnarl (r,on,bo 9A onr1
`2B, Fig. 7). Peak 2A migrated with a pI of 3.0, similar to
`the pI of uroguanylin. Peak 2A also caused a greater
`cGMP response in T84 cells at pH 5.5 than it did at pH
`8, which is consistent with this peptide being urogua-
`nylin. It is likely that uroguanylin was not completely
`separated from guanylin in peak 2 (Fig. 5) during
`Sephadex G-25 chromatography. This uroguanylin-like
`activity of peak 2A exhibited the same chromatographic
`properties as authentic uroguanylin when subjected to
`further analysis by RP-HPLC using C18 columns (data
`not shown). An insufficient quantity of this purified
`peptide prevented its identification by NH2-terminal
`sequence analysis. The guanylin-like bioactivity peak
`that was resolved by isoelectric focusing migrated with
`a pI of 6.0, elicited 27-fold increases in T84 cell cGMP
`levels when assayed at pH 8, and caused only twofold
`increases in cGMP at pH 5.5 (peak 2B, Fig. 7). The pI of
`6.0 is similar to the pl estimated for opossum guanylin
`(~5.2), which contains a histidine residue (18). Peak 2B
`was further purified by a series of C18 RP-HPLC steps
`(7, 18). The guanylin-like activity eluted at about 15%
`acetonitrile (Fig. 8), which is a characteristic property
`of guanylin (18). One percent of this peak elicited a
`15-fold increase in cGMP accumulation when assayed
`at pH 8, but caused no detectable increase in cGMP
`levels in T84 cells at pH 5.5. Further purification by
`RP-HPLC followed by NH2-terminal sequence analysis
`
`12
`
`- 10
`
`-8
`
`-6
`
`-4
`
`2
`
`15
`
`_ 12
`
`Peak #2A
`0
`
`Peak #2B
`
`a. 9 -
`a.
`2
`
`6 -
`
`3 -
`
`0
`
`0 a
`
`.
`
`15
`
`18
`
`3
`
`6
`
`12
`9
`Fraction
`Fig. 7. Isoelectric focusing of peptides extracted from colonic mucosa.
`Fractions displaying predominately guanylin-like activity (including
`fractions comprising peak 2 in Fig. 5) were pooled from 2 separate
`Sephadex G-25 column runs and fractionated by isoelectric focusing
`on the Rotofor apparatus, as described in Fig. 4 legend. Fractions
`(1.0% of fraction volume) were bioassayed for cGMP accumulation in
`T84 cells using pH 5.5 (0) and pH 8.0 (U) medium, as described in
`Fig. 4 legend. •, pH of Rotofor fractions.
`
`35
`
`39
`
`19
`
`23
`
`31
`27
`Fraction
`Fig. 5. Sephadex G-25, gel-filtration chromatography elution profile
`of uroguanylin-like and guanylin-like peptides extracted from colonic
`mucosa. Peptides were extracted from colonic mucosa using Cis
`cartridges and processed as described in MATERIALS AND METHODS for
`application to a 2.5 x 90 cm Sephadex G-25 gel column. Fractions (10
`ml) were collected, and 1.0% of each fraction was assayed in MES,
`DMEM at pH 5.5 (0), and in HEPES, DMEM adjusted to pH 8.0 with
`50 mM sodium bicarbonate (■) for stimulation of cGMP accumulation
`in T84 cells. Illustrated bioactivity profile is a representative experi-
`ment from 1 of 2 Sephadex G-25 column runs.
`
`consistent with that previously observed for the 14- and
`15-amino acid forms of opossum uroguanylin that were
`isolated from urine (18). When the putative urogua-
`nylin peptide from colon was subjected to NH2-terminal
`
`8.5
`
`% 01IJHUOIO3V
`
`8
`
`7.5
`
`0
`
`6
`
`4 -
`
`2 -
`
`0
`
`pmol cGMP per well
`
`29
`
`35
`
`33
`31
`Fraction
`Fig. 6. T84 cell cGMP accumulation responses elicited by urogua-
`nylin purified from opossum colonic mucosa. Fractions were bioas-
`sayed using MES, DMEM at pH 5.5 (O), and HEPES, DMEM, 50 mM
`sodium bicarbonate at pH 8.0 (M). Uroguanylin-like peptides (includ-
`ing the fractions of peak 1 shown in Fig. 5) from 2 successive
`Sephadex G-25 column runs of colonic mucosal extracts were further
`purified as previously described (18) by a preparative isoelectric
`focusing step and 3 reverse-phase high-performance liquid chromatog-
`raphy (RP-HPLC) steps. Purified uroguanylin-like bioactivity shown
`is from fractions obtained after the third RP-HPLC step (thin solid
`line), which used acetonitrile and 10 mM ammonium acetate, pH 6.2,
`to purify peptides, using a 4.9 x 250 mm C15 column, as previously
`described (18).
`
`

`

`UROGUANYLIN: AN INTESTINAL PEPTIDE
`
`G713
`
`but not opossum uroguanylin. Highly purified, sequenc-
`ing-grade chymotrypsin was used to digest the syn-
`thetic peptides for these studies, which was followed by
`five cycles of NH2-terminal sequence analysis. Two
`amino acid sequences were obtained from chymotrypsin-
`digested opossum guanylin, SHTCE and AACAG, which
`were identical to the first five amino acids of the NH2
`
`q Control
`CS
`iii
`CT
`•CT + CS
`
`Basal
`
`Opossum
`ST-(5-17) Opossum
`Uroguanylin Guanylin
`
`nal
`Rat Guanylin
`(93-115)
`
`Rat Guanylin
`(101-115)
`
`CT
`• CT + CS
`
`A
`
`40-
`
`77;
`
`30-
`
`o.
`o.
`O 20-
`o
`0
`E C.
`
`10
`
`B
`
`100
`E
`E x
`to
`2
`
`75
`
`0: 5
`2
`
`25
`
`Synthetic
`Co on
`Uroguanylin
`
`Colon
`Synthetic
`Guanylin
`
`Fig. 9. cGMP responses elicited by chymotrypsin-treated synthetic
`peptides (A) and purified colonic peptides (B). Vehicle or peptides
`were incubated for 1 h at 34°C in 100 p1 of 10 mM HEPES, pH 8.0,
`under the following conditions: minus both chymotrypsin and chy-
`mostatin (control), minus chymotrypsin and plus chymostatin (CS),
`plus chymotrypsin and minus chymostatin (CT), and plus both
`chymotrypsin and chymostatin (CT + CS). Chymotrypsin (0.15 units)
`and chymostatin (100 pM) were used in reactions where indicated.
`After 1-h incubation, 100 pM chymostatin was added to CT reactions.
`Reaction mixtures were processed and analyzed in the T84 cell
`bioassay as described in MATERIALS AND METHODS. A: ST-(5-17) = 3
`nM; opossum guanylin, rat guanylin-(101-115), and opossum urogua-
`nylin = 30 nM; and rat guanylin-(93-115) = 100 nM. Error bars
`indicate standard error of the mean for 3 experiments. B: %maximal
`cGMP responses elicited by purified colonic forms of opossum urogua-
`nylin (Fig. 6) and guanylin (Fig. 8) are shown in comparison to cGMP
`responses elicited by 10 nM of synthetic opossum uroguanylin and
`guanylin after treatments as described for reactions CT and CT + CS.
`cGMP values (pmol/well), representing average of 2 experiments,
`minus basal values of cGMP (-0.2 pmol/well), are as follows: colonic
`uroguanylin, CT — 4.2, CT + CS = 5.7; synthetic uroguanylin, CT =
`2.16, CT + CS = 2.91; colonic guanylin, CT = 0.86, CT + CS = 45.3;
`synthetic guanylin, CT = 0.25, CT + CS = 18.7.
`
`16
`
`-15.5 D
`CDO
`
`CD
`-15 e
`
`14.5
`
`8
`
`7 -
`
`6 -
`
`5 -
`
`4 -
`
`3
`
`2
`
`1
`
`0
`
`pmol cGINAP per well
`
`95
`
`101
`
`99
`97
`Fraction
`Fig. 8. Purification of guanylin from opossum colonic mucosa by
`RP-HPLC. Guanylin-like peptides were purified from colonic mucosal
`extracts and bioassayed at pH 5.5 (O) and pH 8.0 (M) for stimulation
`of cGMP accumulation in T84 cells as described in Fig. 6 legend.
`Purified guanylin shown here was obtained after the third RP-HPLC
`step, which used acetonitrile (thin solid line) and 10 mM ammonium
`acetate, pH 6.2, to purify peptides using a 4.9 X 250 mm C15 column,
`as previously described (18).
`
`of the guanylin-like peptide confirmed that this bioac-
`tive substance was guanylin (SHTCEICAFAACAGC) (18).
`Inactivation of guanylin by chymotrypsin. As an
`additional test that the uroguanylin-like peptide identi-
`fied in opossum colon was not guanylin, we examined
`the guanylin-like and uroguanylin-like peptides that
`were isolated from colonic mucosa for sensitivity to
`inactivation by chymotrypsin in vitro. It has recently
`been reported that treatment of guanylin with chymo-
`trypsin resulted in the inactivation of rat guanylin-
`(101-115), but not a rat guanylin analogue containing
`an asparagine in place of Tyr109 (3). Because urogua-
`nylin has an asparagine instead of Tyr109, we postu-
`lated that uroguanylin would be resistant to chymotryp-
`sin. Figure 9A demonstrates that chymotrypsin
`treatment did not reduce the bioactivity of synthetic E.
`coli ST-(5-17) and synthetic opossum uroguanylin
`under conditions that completely inactivated the syn-
`thetic forms of opossum guanylin, rat guanylin-(101-
`115), and rat guanylin-(93-115). The chymotrypsin
`inhibitor, chymostatin, blocked the inactivation of syn-
`thetic guanylin peptides by chymotrypsin, as deter-
`mined by the T84 cell cGMP bioassay. The T84 cell
`cGMP responses elicited by purified colonic urogua-
`nylin and synthetic opossum uroguanylin were reduced
`by only 25% after treatment with chymotrypsin (Fig.
`9B). In contrast, the cGMP responses elicited by puri-
`fied colonic guanylin and synthetic opossum guanylin
`were reduced by >98% when pretreated with chymo-
`trypsin (Fig. 9B). Thus colonic mucosa contains chymo-
`trypsin-sensitive guanylin peptides, as well as chymo-
`trypsin-resistant uroguanylin peptides.
`NH2-terminal sequence analysis of syn

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket