throbber
PRP
`
`ORIGINAL ARTICLE
`
`Open Access
`
`Therapeutically targeting guanylate cyclase-C:
`computational modeling of plecanatide, a uroguanylin
`analog
`Andrea Branca le 1
`2
`Gary S Jacob
`'School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom
`2Synergy Pharmaceuticals, New York, New York
`
`$, Kunwar Shailubhai
`
`2
`
`, Salvatore Feria 1, Antonio Ricci 1, Marcella Bassetto 1 &
`
`Keywords
`guanylate Cyclase (, linaclotide, molecular
`dynamics, plecanatide, uroguanylin
`
`Correspondence
`Andrea Brancale, Cardiff School of Pharmacy
`and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Cardiff
`University, Redwood Building, King Edward
`VII Avenue, Cardiff, CF10 3NB.
`Tel: +44 (0)29 2087 4485;
`Fax: +44(29) 2087 4149;
`E mail: BrancaleA@cardiff.ac.uk
`
`Funding Information
`Financial Support for this study provided by
`Synergy Pharmaceuticals Inc. We also
`acknowledge the support of the Life Science
`Research Network Wales grant#
`NRNPGSep14008, an initiative funded
`through the Welsh Government's Ser Cymru
`program.
`
`Received: 15 August 2016; Revised: 23
`November 2016; Accepted: 30 November
`2016
`
`Pharma Res Per, 5(2), 2017, e00295,
`doi: 10.1002/prp2.295
`
`doi: 10.1002/prp2.295
`
`Abstract
`
`Plecanatide is a recently developed guanylate cyclase C (GC C) agonist and the
`first uroguanylin analog designed to treat chronic idiopathic constipation (CIC)
`and irritable bowel syndrome with constipation (IBS C). GC C receptors are
`found across the length of the intestines and are thought to play a key role in
`fluid regulation and electrolyte balance. Ligands of the GC C receptor include
`endogenous agonists, uroguanylin and guanylin, as well as diarrheagenic,
`Escherichia coli heat stable enterotoxins (ST). Plecanatide mimics uroguanylin
`in its 2 disulfide bond structure and in its ability to activate GC Cs in a pH
`dependent manner, a feature associated with the presence of acid sensing resi
`dues (Asp2 and Glu3). Linaclotide, a synthetic analog of STh (a 19 amino acid
`member of ST family), contains the enterotoxin's key structural elements,
`including the presence of three disulfide bonds. Linaclotide, like STh, activates
`GC Cs in a pH independent manner due to the absence of pH sensing residues.
`In this study, molecular dynamics simulations compared the stability of pleca
`natide and linaclotide to STh. Three dimensional structures of plecanatide at
`various protonation states (pH 2.0, 5.0, and 7.0) were simulated with GRO
`MACS software. Deviations from ideal binding conformations were quantified
`using root mean square deviation values. Simulations of linaclotide revealed a
`rigid conformer most similar to STh. Plecanatide simulations retained the flexi
`ble, pH dependent structure of uroguanylin. The most active conformers of ple
`canatide were found at pH 5.0, which is the pH found in the proximal small
`intestine. GC C receptor activation in this region would stimulate intraluminal
`fluid secretion, potentially relieving symptoms associated with CIC and IBS C.
`
`Abbreviations
`CIC, chronic idiopathic constipation; FGID, functional gastrointestinal disorder;
`GC C, guanylate cyclase C; GI tract, gastrointestinal tract; IBS C, irritable bowel
`syndrome with constipation; RMSD, root mean square deviation; ST, family of heat
`stable enterotoxin produced by enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli that include STh
`and STp; STh, 19 amino acid member of ST family.
`
`Introduction
`Chronic idiopathic constipation (CIC) and irritable bowel
`syndrome with constipation (IBS C) are two of the most
`common conditions affecting the gastrointestinal (GI)
`
`tract, creating a burden on healthcare resources and lead
`ing to significant negative impact on quality of life (Hei
`delbaugh et al. 2015). These disorders are characterized
`by diminished stool frequency, straining and abdominal
`pain (IBS C) or discomfort (CIC). CIC alone affects 14%
`
`© 2017 The Authors Pharmacology Research & Perspectives published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd,
`British Pharmacological Society and American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
`This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License,
`which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited
`
`2017 I Vol. 5 I lss. 2 I e00295
`Page 1
`
`Bausch Health Ireland Exhibit 2019, Page 1 of 10
`Mylan v. Bausch Health Ireland - IPR2022-00722
`
`

`

`Computational Modeling of Plecanatide, a Uroguanyl in Analog
`
`B. Andrea et al
`
`of the North American population, is chaUenging to treat
`and poses a significant burden on health resources
`(Suares and Ford 2011).
`Guanylate cydase C (GC C) receptors play a crucial
`role in the maintenance of normal bowel function and
`thus have potential as a target fur pharmaceutical inter
`vention in to treat numerous functional gastrointestinal
`disorders. The GC C receptor is a membrane spanning
`protein uniformly expressed along the epithelial brush
`border throughout the intestine (Forte 1999). Recently
`plecanatide and linadotide have been developed for the
`treatment of two of these disorders, CIC and JBS C
`(Shailubhai et al. 2013).
`The GC C receptor is activated by its endogenous pep
`tides uroguanylin and guanylin that differentially bind to
`the receptor in the varying pH environments found along
`the GI tract (Fan et al. 1997). Uroguanylin is primarily
`expressed and preferentiaUy binds GC C receptors in the
`slightly acidic (pH 5 6) regions of the duodenum and
`jejunum (Forte 1999). Guanylin is primarily expressed in
`the ileum and colon, activating GC C receptors under
`more basic conditions (pH 7 8) (Kita et al 1994). Bind
`ing of uroguanylin or guanylin to the GC C receptor ini
`tiates a signaling cascade leading to accumulation of
`intracellular cydic guanosine monophosphate (cGMP)
`(Vaandrager et al. 1997), which helps maintain fluid and
`electrolyte balance, promotes visceral analgesia, and
`reduces inflammation in the GI tract (Hughes et al. 1978;
`Pitari 2013; Shailubhai et al. 2015; Hanning et al. 2014).
`The overlapping yet distinct activities of guanylin and
`uroguanylin suggest that the tight and tunable regulation
`of GC C receptors is essential fur proper GI function, a
`feature that becomes readily apparent by the conse
`quences of dysfunctional GC C activity (Whitaker et al
`1997). Overactivation of GC C receptors by the £ . coli
`enterotoxin (Sfh) triggers an uncontrolled release of elec
`trolytes and water into the intestinal lumen resulting in
`diarrhea (Brierley 2012).
`Studies have shown STh to be 10 times more potent than
`uroguanylin and 100 times more potent than guanylin in
`binding to GC C receptors (Hamra et al 1993). The X ray
`structure of STh reveals that the molecule is locked into a
`constitutively active, right handed spiral formation stabi
`lized by three intrachain disulfide bridges in a 1 4/2 5/3 6
`pattern (Gariepy et al 1987; Ozaki et al. 1991; Shimonishi
`et al. 1987). Unlike STh, the endogenous peptides have only
`two disulfide bridges which likely results in their improved
`flexibility; Klodt et al (1997). The flexibility afforded by
`absence of a third disulfide bridge aUows uroguanylin and
`guanylin to adopt two topological isofurms (A and B) of
`which only the A form is biologically active (Marx et al
`1998; Skelton et al. 1994). The pH dependent activity of
`uroguanylin is linked to two charged acid sensing aspartic
`
`acid residues on its N terminus (Hamra et al 1997). The
`absence of these residues within STh allows it to bypass pH
`checkpoints governing GC C receptor activation, allowing
`fur supraphysiological activation of GC C along the length
`of the small intestine and colon (Hamra et al. 1997).
`Pharmacologic agonists that mimic the activity of
`known GC C agonists have been developed to treat
`patients with CIC and JBS C. Linadotide, a synthetic ana
`log of STh, is available for the treatment of CIC and JBS
`C (Lembo et al 2011). Like STh, linaclotide has three
`disulfide bonds and demonstrates pH independent activa
`tion of GC C receptors (Fig. 1) (Busby et al. 2010).
`Plecanatide is a recently developed GC C agonist and
`uroguanylin analog that is currently in Phase 3 trials for
`CIC and JBS C (Synergy Pharmaceuticals Inc 2015a,b).
`Plecanatide is an orally administered, pH dependent ago
`nist of the GC C receptor that shares the structural and
`physiological characteristics of uroguanylin. Plecanatide
`has two disulfide bonds, similar to uroguanylin, and con
`tains two acidic N terminal amino acids allowing the two
`molecules to maintain the same pH dependent binding
`
`C E~Y c C N
`' ~
`c~
`P
`A
`cGTC
`V
`Linaclotide
`
`Figure 1. Amino acid structures of guanylate cyclase C receptor
`agonists examined in this study Synthetic analogs linaclotide and
`plecanatide share similar amino acid sequences with GC C agonists
`STh and uroguanylin, respectively. Plecanatide,
`like uroguanylin
`contains two pH sensing residues on its N terminus The pH sensi ng
`residue (aspartatic acid, D) of uroguanylin is replaced w it h another
`pH sensing resi due (glutamic acid, E) in plecanatide (green). In this
`study, the pH sensing aspartic acid and glutamic acid residues of
`plecanatide were differentially protonated to reflect pH values 2.0
`(Asp2, Glu3), 5.0 (Asp2 ,Glu3; Asp2, Glu3 ) & ~7 0 (Asp2 , Glu3 ).
`Simulations of the crystal structure of STh used a truncated version of
`the full toxin, com prised of residues 5 17 of the full heat stable
`enterotoxin protein representing the core bioactive pharmacophore of
`pepti de. (A). STh and linaclotide both lack pH sensing residues on
`their N terminal ends and are stabilized into a constit utively active
`conformer by the presence of 3 disuWide bonds. Structurally, the
`pepti des differs by the replacement of leucine (L) in STh w it h tyrosine
`(V-) in linaclotide.
`
`2017 I Vol. 5 I lss. 2 I e00295
`Page 2
`
`© 2017 The Autho.-s Pharmacology Research & Perspectiles published by John v.lley & Sons Ltd,
`British Phannacological Society and American Society 10< Pha nnacology a nd Experimeotal Therapeutics
`
`Bausch Health Ireland Exhibit 2019, Page 2 of I 0
`Mylan v. Bausch Health Ireland - IPR2022-00722
`
`

`

`B. Andrea et al.
`
`Computational Modeling of Plecanatide, a Uroguanylin Analog
`
`characteristics (Fig. 1) (Shailubhai et al. 2013). Given the
`experimental challenges of studying the unique character
`istics of its pH sensitive structure, computational methods
`were employed to characterize behavior of plecanatide at
`various pH states.
`Molecular dynamics (MD) simulations compared the
`flexibility and conformation of plecanatide and linaclotide.
`As expected, linaclotide was shown to adopt rigid confor
`mations, which do not deviate significantly from the struc
`ture of STh. In contrast, plecanatide showed greater
`flexibility and an ability to adopt several conformations
`which vary in response to pH values (2.0, 5.0 and 7.0).
`Active plecanatide conformations were more similar to
`uroguanylin than to the STh peptide, suggesting that pleca
`natide has a similar pH dependent activity profile as uro
`guanylin and that plecanatide's activity can be differentially
`regulated in the GI tract, with higher activity in the more
`acidic proximal small intestine and lower activity in the
`more basic distal small intestine and colon.
`
`Materials and Methods
`
`Peptide preparation
`
`The NMR structures of uroguanylin (PDE ID: lUYA)
`and the crystal structure of STa (PDE ID: lETN)
`(Fig. Sl) were used as starting points for the MD simula
`tions (Ozaki et al. 1991). The STa family of heat stable
`peptides includes STh and STp (Nataro and Kaper 1998).
`The series of experiments used in this study used the STh
`sequence as reference.
`Structural models of plecanatide, linaclotide, and STh
`were built by appropriately modifying the uroguanylin and
`STa sequences, respectively, using the builder tools in molec
`ular operating environment
`[(MOE 2015.4) www.chemc
`omp.com]. (Molecular Operating Environment 2015).
`Simulations and root mean standard deviation (RMSD)
`values of linaclotide and each configuration of plecanatide
`were compared to the enteric pathogen, STh, which was
`selected as the reference peptide because of its enhanced
`affinity for the GC C receptor compared to other ago
`nists. The structural rigidity of STh confers one main
`conformation that would bind the receptor. Similarities
`to this one conformer would reflect a drugs ability to
`activate GC C.
`
`MD simulations
`
`All MD simulations of plecanatide, STh, and linaclotide
`were performed and analyzed using the GROMACS 4.5
`simulation package (Hess et al. 2008). MD simulations of
`the structure of STh used residues 6 18 of the full heat
`stable enterotoxin protein (C C E L C C N P A C T G C),
`
`considered to be the pharmacophore of the molecule
`required for maximum biological activity (Ozaki et al.
`1991; Yoshimura et al. 1985).
`Four protonation states of plecanatide were modeled
`by placing the appropriate charge on Asp2 and Glu3,
`reflecting the most abundant species at three pH environ
`ments: pH 2.0 (Asp2, Glu3), pH 5.0 (Asp2 , Glu3; Asp2,
`Glu3 ), and pH 7.0 (Asp2 , Glu3 ) (Fig. 1 circle). The ini
`tial structure of each peptide was placed in a cubic box
`with TIP 3P water and energy minimized using a Steepest
`Descent Minimization Algorithm. The system was equili
`brated via a 50 ps MD simulation at 310 K in a NVT
`canonical environment followed by an additional 50 ps
`simulation at constant pressure of 1 atm (NPT). After the
`equilibration phases, a 500 ns MD simulations were per
`formed at constant temperature (310 K) and pressure
`with a time step of 2 fs. The system energy and peptide
`spatial coordinates (trajectory file) were stored every
`300 ps for further studies. All MD simulations were run
`in triplicate for each peptide.
`After removing the first 100 ns, considered as system
`stabilization time, the remaining 400 ns of the MD trajec
`tory of every single run for each group of triplicate exper
`iments were combined using the tricat function. The
`combined trajectories (3999 frames) were examined using
`the g cluster function, setting gromos as the clustering
`method with an RMSD cut off of 0.1 nm. The different
`structural cluster groups were obtained as a pdb file.
`Cluster groups representing at least 10% of the total pop
`ulation for each peptide were selected as the most repre
`sentative structure for that peptide.
`
`RMSD comparisons
`
`The representative cluster conformations of the different
`peptides were used for the RMSD comparison against the
`main conformation of the STh cluster.
`RMSD comparisons were performed using MOE 2015.4
`with the major STh cluster structure serving as a reference
`for the superimposition of other peptide conformations.
`
`Results
`
`MD clustering
`
`Table 1 shows the results obtained from the structural
`cluster calculations. From this data it is possible to appre
`ciate how flexible plecanatide is, compared to STh and
`Linaclotide. The latter peptides generated more populated
`cluster than any of the plecanatide forms. RMSD analysis
`of each MD simulations calculated against the most rep
`resentative
`clusters also
`confirm
`this observation
`(Fig. Sl ).
`
`© 2017 The Authors Pharmacology Research & Perspectives published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd,
`British Pharmacological Society and American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
`
`2017 I Vol. 5 I lss. 2 I e00295
`Page 3
`
`Bausch Health Ireland Exhibit 2019, Page 3 of 10
`Mylan v. Bausch Health Ireland - IPR2022-00722
`
`

`

`Computational Modeling of Plecanatide, a Uroguanylin Analog
`
`B. Andrea er al.
`
`Table 1. Representative cluster analysis.
`
`Compound and
`test condition
`
`Cluster % On the
`total frames2
`size'
`
`Average
`RM SD (A) ± SD3
`
`STh
`Linacl otide
`Plecanatide
`pH>7.0
`Pl eca natide
`pH 5.0 (Asp /Glu)4
`
`Plecanatide
`pH 5.0 (Asp/Glu )
`Pl eca natide pH<2.0
`
`2273
`3592
`1108
`
`524
`497
`446
`610
`
`709
`
`56
`89
`28
`
`13
`12
`11
`15
`
`18
`
`0.1252 ± 0.0821
`0.0715 ± 0.0421
`0.1827 ± 0.0862
`
`0.3208 ± 0.1325
`0.2425 ± 0.1044
`0.1252 ± 0.1107
`0.2885 ± 0.1363
`
`0.2115 ± 0.0825
`
`'Th e cluster size refers to the number of frames that are forming the
`cluster. The total number of frames is 3999.
`2Th e % is calculated on the total number of frames.
`3Th e average RM SD is calculated against the most representative clus
`ter conformation for each peptide.
`"Three rep-esentative clust ers were obtained for this peptide.
`
`MD simulations of STh and linaclotide
`
`In addition to providing information on structure, the
`simulations also provided information on the degree of
`internal rigidity and flexibility within the peptide. This
`can be observed in the MD simulations shown in Fig
`ure 2A, in which overlapping snapshots of Sfh show very
`little deviation. The fact that the snapshots show a high
`degree of overlap across all rounds of simulations indi
`cates that Sfh is a fairly rigid molecule with little internal
`flexibility. This constrained geometry is thought to be
`established by the three disulfide bonds of the peptide
`leading to a structural rigidity and high binding affinity
`of STh for the GC C receptor (Ozaki et al 1991).
`MD simulations of linaclotide, which differs from the
`STh peptide used in the simulations by one amino acid
`
`substitution and an additional residue at the C terminus,
`also reveal a rigid molecule that adopts a similar confor
`mation as STh (Fig. 2B). The rigidity of this peptide was
`also confirmed by a RSM fluctuation analysis of the MD
`trajectory (Supplemental Information, Fig. S2). Some
`variability can be seen within the C termini of the pep
`tides, likely due to the extra amino acid in linaclotide
`compared to STh. Moreover, the conformation of the
`interaction loops (regions binding the GC C receptor) is
`homologous between the two molecules (Fig. 2B *)
`(Ozaki et al 1991).
`
`MD simulations of plecanatide
`
`MD simulations of plecanatide were conducted by alter
`ing the amino acid sequence of the NMR structure of
`uroguanylin (Marx et al 1998). Because pH has been
`shown to alter the ability of uroguanylin to activate GC C
`receptors, simulations were conducted on the four ioniza
`tion states of plecanatide' s structure, reflecting three dif
`ferent pH values, by altering the protonation states of
`Asp2 and Glu3 residues. It should be noted that pleca
`natide contains an additional pH sensitive residue, Gius.
`However, unlike Glu3, its side chain is oriented away
`from the interaction loop and, given its position between
`the two disulfide bonds, Gius does not have the confor
`mational freedom to affect the orientation of the loop
`itself. Furthermore, this specific residue is highly con
`served across the whole range of GC C binding peptides,
`and includes STh and linadotide which are not affected
`by pH variations (Busby et al. 2010). For these reasons,
`the protonation state of Gius should not affect the activ
`ity of uroguanylin and plecanatide.
`To represent plecanatide at pH 5.0, which corresponds
`to the pH of the duodenum and proximal jejunum, two
`
`N-tenninus
`
`N-tenninus
`
`■ STh
`linaclotide
`
`Figure 2. MD simulations of STh and linaclotide. (A) Overla pping snapsho1S of STh from MD simulations reveal that the peptide adopts a single
`stable structlJ'e with little flexibility. (BJ Superimposition of represen ta1ive structures from 1he STh and linaclotide. Variations between structures at
`the C terminus reflects changes in conformatio n indu::ed by 1he additional tyrosine of linadotide. Simulations reveal that linadotide adopts a
`similar conformation as STh especially so w ithin the reg ion of the GC C interaction loop (•). MD, M olecular dynamics.
`
`2017 I Vol. 5 I lss. 2 I e00295
`Page 4
`
`© 2017 The Authors Pharmacology Research & Perspectives pul:lished by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
`British Phannacological Society ard America n Society for Phannacology and Experimental Therapeutics
`
`Bausch Health Ireland Exhibit 2019, Page 4 of I 0
`Mylan v. Bausch Health Ireland - IPR2022-00722
`
`

`

`Computational Modeling of Plecanatide, a Uroguanylin Ana log
`
`B. Andrea et al.
`
`(A)
`N-tcrminus
`
`C-terminus
`
`(D)
`
`(B)
`
`*
`
`■ STh ■ PICCllllatidc
`
`Figure 3. Overlapping snapshots of STh and plecanande at pH values 5.0 (A D). 2.0 (E) and >7.0 (F) using MD simulations. (A-C) Overlay of the
`A: 2.38 A; B:2.48 A; C:3 44 A) (D) The
`three predominant Asp /Glu conforma tions of plecanatide and STh at pH 5.0 (RMSD values
`predominant Asp/Glu conformation of plecanatide and STh at pH 5.0 (RMSD value 1.93 A). The overlapping conformation of the interaction
`loops(•) in A and D suggest these are active forms of plecanatide able to bind to and stimulate GC C receptors. (E) Plecanatide conformations at
`pH 2.0 Asp/Glu differ from th ose of STh with no CNerlap of interaction loop (RMSD value 3.45 A). (F) Simulations of the double negative form of
`plecanande. As p/Glu • representing the protonation state at pH > 7.0. reveal a single plecanatide structure that has a minimal overlap of the
`interaction loop (RMSD value 2.54 A). MD. Molecular dynamics
`
`protonation configurations were analyzed. In one, Asp2 is
`protonated (Asp/Glu ), whereas in the other, Glu3 is pro
`tonated (Asp /Glu). These ionii.ation states were based on
`the consideration that, as these residues are on the flexible
`N terminus and exposed to solvent, their pKa values
`would be between 3.5 and 4.5 (values dependent on the
`input peptide conformation as calculated on http:/ /bio
`physics.cs.vt.edu/H++, version 3.2) (Anandakrishnan et al.
`2012); hence, the monoprotonated states would likely be
`present at pH 5.0. Simulations of the two protonation
`states indicate that plecanatide is flexible at this pH and
`can adopt several conformations. Figures 3A-C show an
`overlay of the three predominant Asp /Glu confonnations
`of plecanatide and STh, and Figure 3D shows the pre
`dominant Asp/Glu confonnation of plecanatide and STh.
`In two of these structures (Fig. 3A and D), the interaction
`loop (* ) of plecanatide overlays well with that of STh,
`indicating that these two confonnations of plecanatide
`are capable of binding to and subsequently activating GC
`C receptors.
`Simulations of the double protonated form of pleca
`natide (Asp/Glu) were conducted to assess the structure
`
`and dynamics of the peptide at pH 2.0. The plecanatide
`conformations observed at this pH differ from those of
`STh (Fig. 3£) . Based on these results, plecanatide is unli
`kely to adopt a conformation capable of binding to GC C
`at this highly acidic pH level, a feature which would
`mimic uroguanylin's inability to activate GC C receptors
`at this pH.
`Simulations of the double negative form of plecanatide
`(Asp /Glu ), which
`represent
`the protonation state
`observed at pH > 7.0, reveal a single predominant pleca
`natide structure (Fig. 3F). The portion of the peptide that
`interacts with the GC C receptor adopts a different con
`formation in plecanatide than in STh indicating dimin
`ished activity of the molecule at this pH value.
`Interestingly, in the Asp/Glu ionii.ation state of pleca
`natide at pH 5, an interaction occurred between the
`negatively charged acidic side chain of Glu3 residue in
`the N tenninus and the positively charged side chain of
`Asn9 in the interaction loop (Fig. 4). This interaction
`between the Glu3 residue of the N terminus and the Asn9
`residue of the interaction loop seems to stabilize pleca
`natide in its most active conformation at pH 5. This
`
`© 2017 The Authors Pharmacology Research & Perspectives pubished by John Wiey & Sons Ltd,
`British Pharmacological Society and American Society for Phannacology and Experimental Therapeutics
`
`2017 I Vol. 5 I lss. 2 I e00295
`Page 5
`
`Bausch Health Ireland Exhibit 2019, Page 5 of I 0
`Mylan v. Bausch Health Ireland - IPR2022-00722
`
`

`

`Computational Modeling of Plecanatide, a Uroguanylin Analog
`
`B. Andrea et al
`
`RMS Fluctuation analysis on Plecanatide also confirms
`this flexibility (Fig. S2). The interaction loop of the two
`peptides overlaps generally very well. Some variability is
`observed in the N terminus, where the substitution of
`Asp3 for Glu3 is present.
`In summary, if we consider all simulation sets at pH
`2.0, 5.0, and 7.0, we can observe that plecanatide has the
`required flexibility at these pH values to switch between
`numerous conformations. The most active forms of pleca
`natide were found with the two ionii.ation states represen
`tative of pH 5.0 as revealed by the similarity of their
`interaction loops with the corresponding regions in uro
`guanylin at pH 5 (Fig. 5) and STh (Fig. 3A and F). These
`results are consistent with previous studies reporting that
`plecanatide was designed to be more active at slightly
`acidic pH values, mimicking the pH sensitive behavior of
`uroguanylin (Shailubhai et al 2013).
`
`Comparison of MD simulations
`
`RMSD comparisons of the different peptides analyzed
`were used to quantify the similarities between the struc
`tures. The STh structure was used as a reference and the
`conformations of the different peptides were superim
`posed on the STh molecule to evaluate their similarity to
`the prototype of the active peptide, with lower RMSD
`values indicating more similarity. Table 2 shows the
`RMSD value for each peptide, considering all the repre
`sentative dusters. With an RMSD of 1.28 A, the structure
`of linadotide is more similar to STh than to uroguanylin
`or to any of the plecanatide variants. The RMSD values
`of the different plecanatide conformations show how flex
`ible the peptide is. Interestingly, plecanatide presents
`some conformations that are very close to the reference
`STh (RMSD <2 A), suggesting a peak activity for pleca
`natide at this pH. Additionally, RMSD calculations reveal
`
`Table 2. RMSD com parison between STh and the most representa
`tive clusters of the differen t peptides sim ulated.
`
`Compound and Test Condition
`
`RMSD-A
`
`Linaclotide
`Uroguanylin
`Plecanatide pH>7 o
`Plecanatide pH 5 0 (Asp-/GI u)
`Plecanatide pH 5 0 (Asp/GI u )
`Plecanatide pH<2 o
`
`1.28
`1.2 2.34 1
`2 .54
`3.44, 2.48, 2.382
`1.93
`3.45
`
`' Range of RMSD values between STh and the 10 NMR conformations
`of uroguanyli n.
`2Three representative cl usters (>10%
`see methods section) were
`obtained for this pepti de. RMSD comparisons of the different peptides
`analyzed were used to quantify the similarit ies between the struc
`lures. Lower values indicate higher structural similarit y with STh refer
`ence mdecule.
`
`the AsJ)'Glu
`in
`Figure 4. Structure of plecanatide at pH 5.0,
`ionization state. Interaction (•) between the negative charge of Glu3
`resi due on the pH sens~ive N terminus an d Asn9 residue in the
`interaction loop potentially serves to stabilize this active conformation
`of plecanatide.
`
`N-tenninus
`
`C-tenninus
`
`Figure 5. Overlay of the most active conformation of plecanatide,
`Asp/Glu , (pH 5.0), with the active "A " NMR structure of uroguanylin
`The interaction loop of the two peptides overlaps generally very well
`(•). Some variability is observed in
`the N terminus, where the
`substit ution Asp3/Glu3 is present.
`
`interaction was not observed at other pH values nor is it
`expected to occur with uroguanylin as the Asp3 amino
`acid in uroguanylin would not be of sufficient length to
`interact with the Asn9 residue in its interaction loop.
`Overall, the highly flexible behavior of plecanatide is
`very similar to the one observed with the parent peptide
`uroguanylin (Fig. 5). Indeed, the NMR structures avail
`able for the latter peptide show a high degree of confor
`mational variability that dosely mimics plecanatide. The
`
`2017 I Vo l. 5 I lss. 2 I e00295
`Page 6
`
`© 20 17 The Authors Pharmacology Research & Perspectives published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd,
`British Pharmacologi<.al Society and Ameri<.an Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
`
`Bausch Health Ireland Exhibit 2019, Page 6 of 10
`Mylan v. Bausch Health Ireland - IPR2022-00722
`
`

`

`B Andrea et al.
`
`Computational Modeling of Plecanatide, a Uroguanylin Analog
`
`that these four variants of plecanatide are the closest
`structurally to the active A form of uroguanylin. This is
`consistent with the data described above, in which the
`negative charge of Glu3 interacts with Asn9 in the inter
`action loop, potentially promoting an active conformation
`of plecanatide. These results indicate that, in a manner
`similar to uroguanylin, the activity of plecanatide is not
`"all or nothing" but tunable based upon the pH of the
`environment.
`
`D i scussion
`
`Transmembrane GC C receptors play a critical role in the
`regulation of fluid and electrolyte homeostasis within the
`GI tract (Brierley 2012; Steinbrecher 2014). This balance
`is normally maintained by the pH dependent activation
`of these receptors by the endogenous ligands, uroguany
`lin, and guanylin (Forte 2004). Studies have shown that
`these pH environments are maintained at differential val
`ues across the length of the gastrointestinal tract (Daniel
`et al. 1985; Whitaker et al. 1997). In the slightly acidic
`mucosa! environments of the duodenum and proximal
`jejunum (pH 5.0 6.0), uroguanylin is 10 times more
`potent than in the slightly basic (pH 7.0 8.0) environ
`ments of the ileum and colon (Hamra et al. 1997). In
`contrast, guanylin is significantly more potent at binding
`GC C receptors in the ileum and colon (pH 7.0 8.0) than
`in the duodenum and proximal jejunum (pH 5.0 6.0),
`where it is essentially inactive (Hamra et al. 1997). Struc
`tural shifts induced by pH environments alter the potency
`of these ligands, allowing them to cooperatively regulate
`GC C receptor activation (Hamra et al. 1997). Any per
`turbation in the pH dependent control of GC C activa
`tion would disrupt the delicate balance of electrolytes and
`fluids within the intestines. This disruption could be asso
`ciated with disorders such as obstruction, secretory diar
`rhea and
`inflammatory bowel disease (Field 2003;
`Fiskerstrand et al. 2012).
`Based on their physiology, GC C receptors are a
`promising therapeutic target in the treatment of numer
`ous gastrointestinal disorders such as CIC and IBS C.
`Both are common complaints among all age groups and
`are associated with a substantial burden on healthcare
`resources in the US (Drossman et al. 2009). While the
`exact pathologic mechanism of these diseases remains an
`area of intense study, the symptoms (i.e. diminished stool
`frequency, hard/lumpy stools, straining abdominal symp
`toms) indicate an imbalance in fluid and electrolyte
`homeostasis in the GI tract (Steinbrecher 2014).
`As an analog of the pathological GC C agonist STh,
`linaclotide maintains many structural features of STh,
`including the presence of three disulfide bonds and an
`insensitivity to pH. MD simulations in this study show
`
`that the addition of a third intramolecular bond makes
`both STh and linaclotide insensitive to MD perturbations
`(Ozaki et al. 1991). The structural similarity of these two
`molecules is reflected by the low RMSD values of 1.28 A
`for linaclotide. The amino acid substitutions that differen
`tiate linaclotide from STh further enhance the pharma
`cokinetic stability and proteolytic resistance of linaclotide,
`allowing it to remain active across a longer portion of the
`small intestine (Bharucha and Waldman 2010; Harris and
`Crowell 2007). The absence of pH sensing amino acid
`residues would additionally give these molecules maxi
`mum biological activity across the range of pH environ
`ments in the GI tract. This lack of focused areas of
`activity may induce excessive fluid secretion and explain
`the increased incidence of diarrhea associated with lina
`clotide (Busby and Ortiz 2014; Carpick and Gariepy 1993;
`Lembo et al. 2011).
`Plecanatide, a GC C agonist under investigation for
`IBS C and CIC, differs from linaclotide in its amino acid
`sequence and number of disulfide bonds. Plecanatide
`maintains many of the structural and functional charac
`teristics of endogenous ligand uroguanylin, including the
`two disulfide bonds and the two N terminal pH sensing
`acidic residues, which result in a molecule that can exhi
`bit differential levels of activity based upon the pH of the
`environment. As a result, plecanatide has a more targeted
`zone of activation, stimulating GC C receptors under
`acidic conditions in a way that is similar to uroguanylin
`(Shailubhai et al. 2015).
`MD simulations of plecanatide in this study revealed
`plecanatide to be a flexible structure that is unlike STh or
`linaclotide and one that is able to adopt numerous con
`formations in response to a range of simulated pH envi
`ronments. O

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket