throbber

`
`SP-304: STIMULATION OF INTRACELLULAR cGMP SYNTHESIS IN T84 CELLS
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Study Number:
`
`SP-PH-001
`
`Test Article:
`
`SP-304
`
`Author:
`
`Kunwar Shailubhai
`
`
`Senior Vice President, Discovery
`
`
`Synergy Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
`
`Study Dates:
`
`
`
`September 2001 to November 2001
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Testing Facility: R&D Center, Synergy Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Norristown, PA
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Final Report Date:
`
`
`
`February 15, 2008
`
`Source Data:
`
`Synergy Pharmaceuticals Lab Notebook# 2; Pages: 70-91
`
`
`
`
`Dr. Surendra Dheer
`
`Synergy Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
`
`
`
`420 Lexington Ave. -Suite 1609
`New York, NY 10170
`
`
`
`Confidentiality Statement
`
`This document is the property of Synergy Pham1aceuticals Inc., and is confidential and proprietary. This
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`information contained herein is believed to be accurate and complete as of the date of preparation. The contents
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`may not be used in regulatory submissions without the expressed consent of Synergy Pharmaceuticals Inc.
`
`HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION
`
`TRUL00018203
`
`Bausch Health Ireland Exhibit 2027, Page 1 of 22
`Mylan v. Bausch Health Ireland - IPR2022-00722
`
`

`

`Synergy Pharmaceuticals Inc.
`
`Study No. SP-PH-001
`
`Page2
`
`TABLE OF CONTENTS
`
`
`
`
`
`SIGNATURE PAGE ...................................................................................................................... 3
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`LIST OF TABLES .......................................................................................................................... 4
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`LIST OF FIGURES ........................................................................................................................ 5
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS ......................................................................................................... 6
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`l. ABSTRACT ............................................................................................................................... 7
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`2. OBJECTIVE .............................................................................................................................. 8
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`3 . MATERIALS AND METHODS ............................................................................................... 8
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`3.1 Cell Lines ......................................................................................................................... 8
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`3.2 Chemicals and Reagents ................................................................................................... 8
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`.............................. 8 ...............................................3 .3 Test Materials ......................................
`
`
`
`
`
`
`3.3 cGMP Stimulation Assay ................................................................................................. 9
`
`4. RE SUL TS .................................................................................................................................. 9
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`4.1 Stimulation of cGMP Synthesis by SP-304, Uroguanylin, and Related Peptides ................ 9
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`5. CONCLUSION ........................................................................................................................ 11
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`6. REFERENCES ........................................................................................................................ 12
`
`
`
`CONFIDENTIAL
`
`HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION
`
`TRUL00018204
`
`Bausch Health Ireland Exhibit 2027, Page 2 of 22
`Mylan v. Bausch Health Ireland - IPR2022-00722
`
`

`

`Synergy Pharmaceuticals Inc.
`
`Study No. SP-PH-001
`
`Page3
`
`EFFECTS OF SP-304 IN THE T84 CELL cGMP STIMULATION BIOASSAY
`
`SIGNATURE PAGE
`
`
`
`The undersigned have reviewed the format and content ofthis report and have approved the
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`report for final issuance.
`
`�.
`
`Kunwar Shailubhai, Ph.D.
`Sr. Vice President Discovery
`Synergy Phannaccuticals, Inc.
`
`Date
`
`CSOandCEO
`
`
`
`Inc. . Callisto Pharmaceuticals,
`
`.Date
`
`CONFIDENTIAL
`
`HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION
`
`TRUL00018205
`
`Bausch Health Ireland Exhibit 2027, Page 3 of 22
`Mylan v. Bausch Health Ireland - IPR2022-00722
`
`

`

`Synergy Pharmaceuticals Inc.
`
`Study No. SP-PH-001
`
`Page4
`
`LIST OF TABLES
`Table l: Effects of SP-304, Uroguanylin, and Other Test Peptides in the T84 Cell cGMP
`Stimulation Bioassay .................................................................................................................... 10
`
`CONFIDENTIAL
`
`HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION
`
`TRUL00018206
`
`Bausch Health Ireland Exhibit 2027, Page 4 of 22
`Mylan v. Bausch Health Ireland - IPR2022-00722
`
`

`

`Synergy Pharmaceuticals Inc.
`
`Study No. SP-PH-001
`
`Page5
`
`LIST OF FIGURES
`Figure 1: Dose-Response for SP-304, Uroguanylin (UroG), and Other Test Peptides in the T84
`Cell cGMP Stimulation Bioassay ................................. .................................... ....................... ..... 11
`
`CONFIDENTIAL
`
`HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION
`
`TRUL00018207
`
`Bausch Health Ireland Exhibit 2027, Page 5 of 22
`Mylan v. Bausch Health Ireland - IPR2022-00722
`
`

`

`Synergy Pharmaceuticals Inc.
`
`Study No. SP-PH-001
`
`Page6
`
`LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS
`
`cGMP
`DMEM
`ECso
`ELISA
`IBMX
`UG orUroG
`
`cyclic guanosine monophosphate
`Dulbecco's modified Eagle medium
`median effective concentration (required to induce a 50% effect)
`enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay
`isobutylmethylxanthine
`uroguanylin
`
`CONFIDENTIAL
`
`HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION
`
`TRUL00018208
`
`Bausch Health Ireland Exhibit 2027, Page 6 of 22
`Mylan v. Bausch Health Ireland - IPR2022-00722
`
`

`

`Synergy Pharmaceuticals Inc.
`
`Study No. SP-PH-001
`
`Page7
`
`1. ABSTRACT
`
`The objective of this study was to examine the ability of SP-304 to stimulate cyclic guanosine
`
`monophosphate (cGMP) production in T84 human colon carcinoma cells in vitro. The effects of
`SP-304 were compared to uroguanylin and to other structurally related peptides.
`
`SP-304, uroguanylin, and two related peptides (SP-302 and SP-303) were tested at
`concentrations ranging from 10-9 M to 10-5 M. Cell culture supematants were prepared following
`30-minute incubation, and cGMP levels were measured using a commercial ELISA assay.
`
`All four peptides increased cGMP production in a concentration-dependent manner. At a
`common concentration of 10-6 M (1 µM), cGMP levels were observed to be 54% higher in SP-
`304 treated cells compared to uroguanylin treated cells. SP-304 was the most potent peptide
`tested, with an EC50 of 10-7 M. SP-304 was at least 10-fold more potent than uroguanylin and
`the other test peptides. These data confirm the activity and potency of SP-304 in the cGMP
`stimulation bioassay in T84 cells.
`
`CONFIDENTIAL
`
`HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION
`
`TRUL00018209
`
`Bausch Health Ireland Exhibit 2027, Page 7 of 22
`Mylan v. Bausch Health Ireland - IPR2022-00722
`
`

`

`Synergy Pharmaceuticals Inc.
`
`Study No. SP-PH-001
`
`Page 8
`
`2. OBJECTIVE
`
`The objective of this study was to examine the ability of SP-304 to stimulate cyclic guanosine
`
`monophosphate (cGMP) production in T84 human colon carcinoma cells in vitro. The effects of
`SP-304 were compared to uroguanylin (UG or UroG) and to other structurally related peptides.
`
`3. MATERIALS AND METHODS
`
`3.1
`
`Cell Lines
`
`Human colon carcinoma cells T84 (ATCC Number CCL-248), provided by Dr. Lenard Forte,
`University of Missouri at Columbia, MO, were used in these assays. The cells were cultured in
`Dulbecco's Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM) and Ham's F-12 medium (1:1) containing 5% fetal
`bovine serum and 60 µg of penicillin plus 100 µg of streptomycin per ml ( 1 ). Cells were split
`every 5-6 days by trypsanization. Frozen stocks of cells were stored in liquid nitrogen.
`
`3.2 Chemicals and Reagents
`
`All chemicals and reagents were obtained from commercial vendors such as Sigma Chemical
`Co., St. Louis, MO.
`
`3.3
`
`Test Materials
`
`The following test peptides were synthesized by BACHEM Biosciences, Inc. (King of Prussia,
`PA) as the trifluoroacetic acid salt form.
`
`Test Peptide
`
`Mol.
`Wei2ht
`
`Amino Acid Sequence *
`
`SP-301
`(uroguanylin)
`
`1668
`
`I
`I
`Asn 1-Asp2-Glu3-Cys4-Glu5-Leu6-Cys7-Val8-Asn9-Val10-Ala 11-Cys 12-Thr13-Gly 14-Cys 15-Leu 16
`I
`I
`
`SP-302
`
`1696
`
`I
`Asn 1-Glu2-Glu3-Cys4-Glu5-Leu6-rys7-Val8-Asn9-Val10-Ala 11-Cys 12-Thr13-Gly14-Cr 15-Leu 16
`
`I
`
`SP-303
`
`1682
`
`SP-304
`
`1682
`
`Asn 1-Glu2-Asp3-Cys4-Glu5-Leu6-Cys7-Val8-Asn9-Vai10-Ala 11-Cys 12-Thr13-Giy14-Cys 15-Leu 16
`
`I
`
`I
`
`I
`
`f
`
`I
`Asn 1-Asp2-Glu3-Cys4-Glu5-Leu6-Cys7-Val8-Asn9-Vai10-Ala 11-Cys 12-Thr13-Gly14-Cys 15-Leu 16
`
`I
`
`f
`
`I
`
`* Note: brackets indicate the location of disulfide bonds
`
`All peptides were prepared as stock solutions at a concentration of 1 mM in deionized water.
`For each peptide, cGMP levels were tested at concentrations ranging from 10-9 M (0.001 µM) to
`10-5 M (10 µM). Control wells contained no peptide.
`
`CONFIDENTIAL
`
`HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION
`
`TRUL00018210
`
`Bausch Health Ireland Exhibit 2027, Page 8 of 22
`Mylan v. Bausch Health Ireland - IPR2022-00722
`
`

`

`Synergy Pharmaceuticals Inc.
`
`Study No. SP-PH-001
`
`Page9
`
`cGMP Stimulation Assay
`3.3
`The potency oftest peptides to stimulate cGMP synthesis in T84 cells was assessed using a
`published procedure (8). Briefly, confluent monolayers of T-84 cells in 24-well plates were
`washed twice with 250 µl ofDMEM containing 50 mM HEPES (pH 7.4) and pre-incubated at
`37°C for 10 min with 250 µl ofDMEM containing 50 mM HEPES (pH 7.4) and 1 mM isobutyl
`methylxanthine (IBMX). The test peptides were then incubated for 30 min. The medium was
`then aspirated and the reaction was terminated by the addition of 3% perchloric acid. Following
`centrifugation and the addition ofNaOH (0.1 N) to neutralize the pH, intracellular cGMP levels
`were determined in lysates using a cGMP ELISA kit (Cat. No. 581021, Cayman Chemical, Ann
`Arbor, Ml.). Samples were run in duplicates incubations and each sample was run as duplicates
`in ELISA test.
`
`4. RESULTS
`
`4.1 Stimulation of cGMP Synthesis by SP-304, Uroguanylin, and Related Peptides
`The results with SP-304, uroguanylin and other related peptides are presented in Table 1. At a
`common concentration of 10-6 M (1 µM), cGMP levels were observed to be 54% higher in SP-
`304 treated cells compared to uroguanylin treated cells. Cyclic GMP levels in SP-302- treated
`cells were just 10% higher than uroguanylin treated cells, while cGMP levels in SP-303-treated
`cells were 5% lower compared to uroguanylin.
`Figure 1 shows the concentration-response for all four peptides with respect to cGMP production
`in T84 cells. All four peptides increased cGMP production in a concentration-dependent
`manner. SP-304 was the most potent peptide tested, with an EC50 of 10-7 M. SP-304 was at least
`10-fold more potent than uroguanylin and the other test peptides.
`
`CONFIDENTIAL
`
`HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION
`
`TRUL00018211
`
`Bausch Health Ireland Exhibit 2027, Page 9 of 22
`Mylan v. Bausch Health Ireland - IPR2022-00722
`
`

`

`Synergy Pharmaceuticals Inc.
`
`Study No. SP-PH-001
`
`Page 10
`
`Table 1: Effects of SP-304, Uroguanylin, and Other Test Peptides in the T84 Cell cGMP
`Stimulation Bioassay
`
`Test Material
`
`SP-301
`(uroguanylin)
`
`SP-302
`
`SP-303
`
`SP-304
`
`Concentration
`ng/mL
`Molar
`0
`0
`10-• M
`1.668
`10-•M
`16.668
`10-'M
`166.8
`10-0 M
`1668
`10-' M
`16680
`0
`0
`10-"M
`1.696
`10-8M
`16.96
`10-'M
`169.6
`10-0 M
`1696
`10-'M
`16960
`0
`0
`10-" M
`1.682
`10-•M
`16.82
`10-'M
`168.2
`10-6M
`1682
`10-' M
`16820
`0
`0
`10-"M
`1.682
`10-•M
`16.82
`10-1M
`168.2
`10-0 M
`1682
`10-' M
`16820
`* cGMP levels in T84 cells after a 30-minute incubation.
`** EC50: median effective concentration (required to induce a 50% effect)
`
`cGMP Levels
`(pmol/well) *
`0
`0
`12
`82
`205
`254
`0
`0
`8
`62
`185
`248
`0
`0
`12
`82
`195
`254
`0
`0
`17
`149
`320
`315
`
`ECso * *
`
`Molar
`
`ng/mL
`
`10-6M
`
`1668
`
`10-6M
`
`1696
`
`10-6M
`
`1682
`
`10-7 M
`
`168.2
`
`CONFIDENTIAL
`
`HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION
`
`TRUL00018212
`
`Bausch Health Ireland Exhibit 2027, Page 10 of 22
`Mylan v. Bausch Health Ireland - IPR2022-00722
`
`

`

`Synergy Pharmaceuticals Inc.
`
`Study No. SP-PH-001
`
`Page 1 1
`
`Figure 1: Dose-Response for SP-304, Uroguanylin (UroG), and Other Test Peptides in the
`T84 Cell cGMP Stimulation Bioassay
`
`350
`
`300
`
`250
`
`200
`
`150
`
`100
`
`50
`
`0
`
`0
`
`-9
`
`-7
`-8
`-6
`
`Log Peptide [M]
`
`-6
`
`5. CONCLUSION
`
`Overall, the results of this study demonstrate that SP-304 stimulated cGMP production in T84
`colon carcinoma cells in a concentration-related manner, with an EC50 of 10-7 M (168.2 ng/mL).
`SP-304 was at least 10-fold more potent than uroguanylin and other related test peptides in this
`bioassay, and induced higher cGMP levels (>50% greater) compared to uroguanylin.
`
`CONFIDENTIAL
`
`HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION
`
`TRUL00018213
`
`Bausch Health Ireland Exhibit 2027, Page 11 of 22
`Mylan v. Bausch Health Ireland - IPR2022-00722
`
`

`

`Synergy Pharmaceuticals Inc.
`
`Study No. SP-PH-001
`
`Page 12
`
`6. REFERENCES
`
`1. Shailubhai, K., Yu, H. H., Karunanandaa, K., Wang, J. Y., Eber, S. L., Wang, Y., Joo, N.
`S., Kim, H. D., Miedema, B. W., Abbas, Z., Boddupalli, S. B., Mark G. Currie., and
`Forte, L. R. "Uroguanylin treatment suppresses polyps formation in APC"in;+ mouse and
`induces apoptosis in human colon adenocarcinoma cells by a cGMP dependent
`mechanism". Cancer Res, 60:5151-5157, 2000.
`
`
`CONFIDENTIAL
`
`HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION
`
`TRUL00018214
`
`Bausch Health Ireland Exhibit 2027, Page 12 of 22
`Mylan v. Bausch Health Ireland - IPR2022-00722
`
`

`

`Final Report Amendment Number 1
`
`SP-304: Stimulation of Intracellular cGMP Synthesis in T84 Cells
`
`Study Number:
`
`SP-PH-001
`
`Test Articles:
`
`SP-304
`
`Author:
`
`Kunwar Shailubhai
`
`Study Dates:
`
`September 2001 to November 2001
`
`Testing Facility:
`
`R&D Center, Synergy Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Norristown, PA
`
`Final Report Date:
`
`February 15, 2008
`
`Final Report
`Amendment Date:
`
`25 June 2015
`
`Synergy Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
`420 Lexington Ave. - Suite 1609
`New York, NY 10170
`
`HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION
`
`TRUL00018215
`
`Bausch Health Ireland Exhibit 2027, Page 13 of 22
`Mylan v. Bausch Health Ireland - IPR2022-00722
`
`

`

`Page 2 SP-PH-001 Final Report Amendment Number 1
`
`TABLE OF CONTENTS
`
`SIGNATURE PAGE ...................................................................................................................... 3
`l. DETAILS OF THE FINAL REPORT AMENDMENT ............................................................ 4
`Item 1 .......................................................................................................................................... 4
`
`HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION
`
`TRUL00018216
`
`Bausch Health Ireland Exhibit 2027, Page 14 of 22
`Mylan v. Bausch Health Ireland - IPR2022-00722
`
`

`

`
`
`Page 3 SP-PH-001 Final Repo11 Amendment Number I
`
`
`
`Final Report Amendment Number 1
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`SP-304: Stimulation of Inti-accUular cGMP Synthesis in T84 Cells
`
`SIGNATURE PAGE
`
`
`
`The undersigned reviewed the format and content of this final report amendment and approved
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`the amendment for final issuance.
`
`Kunwar Shailubhai
`
`Date
`
`
`
`HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION
`
`TRUL00018217
`
`Bausch Health Ireland Exhibit 2027, Page 15 of 22
`Mylan v. Bausch Health Ireland - IPR2022-00722
`
`

`

`Page 4 SP-PH-001 Final Report Amendment Number 1
`
`1. DETAILS OF THE FINAL REPORT AMENDMENT
`Note: Text to be removed is identified by a strik&hrough and new text is presented in bold.
`
`Item 1
`Report Page Number: 8
`Report Section Number: 3 .3
`Report Section Title: Test Materials
`Section Test peptide Table: Uroguanylin amino acid sequence
`
`1
`
`:I
`
`;i
`
`4
`
`:,
`
`ti
`
`/
`
`
`
`8 1U 1 1 1:1 1 J 14 1 :, B
`
`
`
`Asn -Asp -Gil! -Cys -Glu -Leu -Cys -Val -Asn -Val -Ala -Cys -Thr -Gly -Cys -Leu
`
`1 ti
`
`Replace with
`
`1
`
`Z
`
`J
`
`4
`
`0
`
`0
`
`f
`
`Asn -Asp -Asp -Cys -Glu -Leu -Crs -Val -Asn -Val -Ala -Cys -Thr -Gly -Cr -Leu
`
`
`
`ts lU 7 7 lZ H
`
`
`
`1;:s
`
`14
`
`10 1 0
`
`Reason for Amendment: Correct error in uroguanylin amino acid sequence.
`
`HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION
`
`TRUL00018218
`
`Bausch Health Ireland Exhibit 2027, Page 16 of 22
`Mylan v. Bausch Health Ireland - IPR2022-00722
`
`

`

`Final Report Amendment Number 2
`
`SP-304: Stimulation of Intracellular cGMP Synthesis in T84 Cells
`
`Study Number:
`
`SP-PH-001
`
`Test Articles:
`
`SP-304
`
`Author:
`
`Kunwar Shailubhai
`
`Study Dates:
`
`September 2001 to November 2001
`
`Testing Facility:
`
`R&D Center, Synergy Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Norristown, PA
`
`Final Report Date:
`
`February 15, 2008
`
`Final Report
`Amendment Date:
`
`17 September 2015
`
`Synergy Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
`420 Lexington Ave. - Suite 1609
`New York, NY 10170
`
`HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION
`
`TRUL0001821 9
`
`Bausch Health Ireland Exhibit 2027, Page 17 of 22
`Mylan v. Bausch Health Ireland - IPR2022-00722
`
`

`

`Page 2 SP-PH-001 Final Report Amendment Number 2
`
`TABLE OF CONTENTS
`
`SIGNATURE PAGE ...................................................................................................................... 3
`l. DETAILS OF THE FINAL REPORT AMENDMENT ............................................................ 4
`Item 1 .......................................................................................................................................... 4
`Iten1 2 .......................................................................................................................................... 5
`Item 3 .......................................................................................................................................... 6
`
`HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION
`
`TRUL00018220
`
`Bausch Health Ireland Exhibit 2027, Page 18 of 22
`Mylan v. Bausch Health Ireland - IPR2022-00722
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`Pag,e 3 SP-PH-001 Final Report A.wendment Number 2
`
`Final Report Amendment Number 2
`
`SP-304: Stimulation of Intracellular cGMP Synthesis in T84 Cells
`
`SIGNATURE PAGE
`
`
`
`The undersigned reviewed the format and content of this final report amendment and approved
`
`
`
`
`
`the amendment for final issuance.
`
`Kunwar Shailubhai
`
`Date
`
`HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION
`
`TRUL00018221
`
`Bausch Health Ireland Exhibit 2027, Page 19 of 22
`Mylan v. Bausch Health Ireland - IPR2022-00722
`
`

`

`
`
`Page 4 SP-PH-0 0 1 Final Report Amendment Number 2
`
`
`
`
`
`1. DETAILS OF THE FINAL REPORT AMENDMENT
`
`Note: Text to be removed is identified by a strik&hrough and new text is presented in bold.
`
`Item 1
`
`Report Page Number: 10
`Report Section Number: 4.1
`Report Section Title: Stimulation of cGMP Synthesis by SP-304, Uroguanylin, and Related
`Peptides
`
`Effects of SP-304, Uroguanylin, and Other Test Peptides in the T84 cGMP
`Table 1.
`Stimulation Bioassay
`
`Test Material
`
`ECso **
`
`Molar
`
`ng/mL
`
`Concentration
`cGMP Levels
`(pmol/well) *
`ng/mL
`Molar
`0
`0
`0
`1 0-'M
`1 .668
`0
`SP-30 1
`12
`1 0-•M
`1 6 . 668
`(uroguanylin)
`82
`1 0- M
`1 66 . 8
`205
`1 0-0 M
`1 66 8
`1 0-, M
`1 6680
`254
`0
`0
`0
`1 0-•M
`1 .696
`0
`1 6.96
`8
`1 0-"M
`62
`1 0- 'M
`1 69.6
`1 8 5
`1 0-0M
`1 696
`248
`1 0-'M
`1 6960
`0
`0
`0
`1 .682
`0
`1 0-'M
`12
`1 0-"M
`1 6.82
`82
`1 68.2
`1 0-'M
`195
`1 0-0 M
`1 682
`254
`1 0-'M
`1 6820
`0
`0
`0
`1 0-'M
`1 .682
`0
`17
`1 6.82
`1 0-"M
`1 68.2
`149
`1 0-'M
`1 0-0 M
`320
`1 682
`3 1 5
`1 0--M
`1 6820
`
`
`
`cGMP levels in T84 cells after a 3 0-minute incubation.
`
`
`
`
`
`a 5 0% effect) to induce (required EC50: median effective concentration
`
`-1-Q.-&
`-M
`2.3x10-7M
`
`-1-Q.-&-M
`3.5x10-7M
`
`-1-Q.-&
`-M
`2.4x10-7M
`
`w-+
`-M
`1.1x10-7M
`
`-Me%
`383.6
`
`-±-9%
`593.6
`
`-l-6&2-
`403.7
`
`-1-6&4
`1 85.0
`
`SP-3 02
`
`SP-303
`
`SP-304
`
`*
`
`**
`
`To update the scientific notation for the EC50 molar value for each
`Reason for Amendment:
`
`peptide to include the coefficient as well as the exponent and to update the corresponding ng/mL
`values. The new values were calculated using Prism 6 (Version 6.05) using a nonlinear
`regression curve fit (log[peptide concentration] versus cGMP level) using a least squares fit with
`no constraints)
`
`HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION
`
`TRUL00018222
`
`Bausch Health Ireland Exhibit 2027, Page 20 of 22
`Mylan v. Bausch Health Ireland - IPR2022-00722
`
`

`

`Page 5 SP-PH-001 Final Report Amendment Number 2
`
`Item 2
`
`Report Page Number: 1 1
`
`
`
`
`Report Section Number: 4.1
`
`
`
`
`Peptides
`
`
`
`
`
`Report Section Title: Stimulation of cGMP Synthesis by SP-304, Uroguanylin, and Related
`
`
`
`Replace the original Figure l below
`
`
`
`
`
`350
`
`$()()
`
`260
`
`200
`
`• UfOG·
`* SP-302
`,, Sf'-303
`❖ SP-304
`
`150
`
`100
`
`60
`
`o ,
`
`
`
`Log Peptide l.lVl]
`
`
`
`
`
`with the following updated figure:
`
`....... SP-302
`
`350 ...... UG
`- 300
`SP-304
`---
`'ai
`� 250
`In _..,_. SP-303
`,St 200
`� 150
`
`� 100
`u 50
`
`0
`-10
`
`?_.,,...,----.
`
`,·
`-J AY· ··
`�"?'
`
`i
`
`'./
`
`..g
`
`� '"'5
`-8
`-7
`Log Peptide [M]
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Reason for Amendment:
`
`the updated analyses described in Item l .
`
`The curves in the new figure depict the dose-response curves derived from
`
`HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION
`
`TRUL00018223
`
`Bausch Health Ireland Exhibit 2027, Page 21 of 22
`Mylan v. Bausch Health Ireland - IPR2022-00722
`
`

`

`Page 6 SP-PH-001 Final Report Amendment Number 2
`
`Item 3
`Report Page Number: 11
`Report Section Number: 5
`Report Section Title: Conclusion
`
`Overall, the results of this study demonstrate that SP-304 stimulated cGMP production in T84
`colon carcinoma cells in a concentration-related manner, with an BGw ef-1-0-1- EC50 of 1.1 x
`10-7M (168.2 ag/ml,) (185 ng/mL). SP-304 was at least 10 2-3 fold more potent than
`uroguanylin (EC50 2.3 x 10-7M) and other related test peptides (SP-302 EC50 3.5 x 10-7M and
`SP-303 EC50 2.4 x 10-7M) in this bioassay, and induced higher cGMP levels (>50% greater)
`compared to uroguanylin
`Reason for Amendment: To incorporate the updated results into the conclusion.
`
`HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION
`
`TRUL00018224
`
`Bausch Health Ireland Exhibit 2027, Page 22 of 22
`Mylan v. Bausch Health Ireland - IPR2022-00722
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket