throbber
FEBS 18603
`
`FEBS Letters 408 (1997) 345-349
`
`Dual regulation of heat-stable enterotoxin-mediated cGMP accumulation
`in T84 cells by receptor desensitization and increased phosphodiesterase
`activity
`
`Manjiri M. Bakre, Sandhya S. Visweswariah*
`
`Center For Reproductive Biology and Molecular Endocrinology, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore 560012, India
`
`Received 10 March 1997
`
`Abstract We report the regulation of cGMP accumulation
`induced by the heat-stable enterotoxin, STh, in the T84 human
`colonic cell line. STh binding to its receptor, guanylyl cyclase C
`(GCC), leads to elevated intracellular levels of cGMP.
`Prolonged exposure of T84 cells to STh induced refractoriness
`to further cGMP accumulation, without significant receptor
`internalization, but with reduced STh-induced cGMP synthesis
`by the receptor. Significantly, increased degradation of cGMP
`by a cGMP-specific phosphodiesterase was observed in desensi-
`tized cells. This is the first report on the desensitization of GCC,
`as well as the role of the Type V phosphodiesterase in inducing
`cellular refractoriness.
`© 1997 Federation of European Biochemical Societies.
`
`Key words: Guanylyl cyclase C; Heat-stable enterotoxins;
`Cellular refractoriness; cGMP-binding, cGMP-specific
`phosphodiesterase
`
`1. Introduction
`
`The heat-stable enterotoxins (ST) are a family of low mo-
`lecular weight, methanol soluble, cysteine rich peptides, pro-
`duced by E. coil and other pathogenic bacteria, that cause
`diarrhea in farm animals and in man [1]. Binding of the toxin
`to a receptor present in intestinal cells leads to elevation of
`intracellular cGMP and a consequent efflux of chloride and
`fluid from the cells, resulting in diarrhea [2]. The receptor for
`E. coli STh, GCC, has been cloned from rat and human in-
`testinal cells [3,4], as well as from human colonic cell lines [5].
`Based on sequence homology studies predicted from the nu-
`cleotide sequence of the cloned ST receptors, the ST receptor
`(GCC) is a member of the family of membrane bound gua-
`nylyl cyclases [6].
`A characteristic feature of any ligand receptor-mediated
`signal transduction process is the phenomenon of desensitiza-
`tion whereby cellular response to a stimulus is attenuated, or
`demonstrates refractoriness, following prior exposure of the
`cells to the ligand in question. ST-mediated diarrheas are
`transitory in nature, but the mechanism of this refractoriness,
`presumably induced in the intestinal cells which have been
`exposed to ST peptide, is unknown. Whether such refractori-
`ness involves receptor desensitization, or other intracellular
`mechanisms has not been investigated till date.
`
`*Corresponding author. Fax: (91) (80) 3341683.
`
`Abbreviations: cGB-PDE, cGMP-binding, cGMP-specific phospho-
`diesterase; GCC, guanylyl cyclase C; PDE, phosphodiesterase; IBMX,
`isobutyl methyl xanthine; STh, stable toxin of the human variety;
`STY72F, mutant ST peptide where the C-terminal tyrosine is mutated
`to phenylalanine
`
`Cellular refractoriness to a given stimulus could be medi-
`ated by an altered rate of synthesis or degradation of the
`second messenger, for example cAMP or cGMP. Synthetic
`rates are presumably regulated by the receptor, which in the
`case of guanylyl cyclase coupled receptors, serves as the en-
`zyme per se. The rate of degradation of cAMP has been
`shown to play an important role in inducing the refractoriness
`of Sertoli cells to follicle stimulating hormone [7], by the hy-
`peractivation of a cAMP-specific phosphodiesterase (PDE).
`No such mechanism of regulation has been reported, to our
`knowledge, for cGMP-mediated mechanisms, and hence the
`ST response in T84 cells could serve as a useful model system
`to study such cellular refractoriness.
`The T84 cell line has been used by us to study the STh
`receptor, and we have shown that a single class of receptor
`with high affinity (Kd 0.1 nM) is expressed in these cells [8,9].
`In this study we report that T84 cells show refractoriness to
`fresh stimulation by ST, following prolonged incubation with
`the peptide. This refractoriness is at the level of the degrada-
`tion of the second messenger, cGMP, as a result of increased
`activity of a cGMP-specific PDE, as well as receptor inacti-
`vation at the level of guanylyl cyclase activity.
`
`2. Materials and methods
`
`All fine chemicals were from Sigma Chemical Co., USA, and tissue
`culture media from Life Technologies, USA.
`
`2.1. Culture and maintenance of T84 cells
`T84 cells were obtained from ATCC (CCL 247), and maintained in
`Dulbecco's Modified Eagle's medium:F12 containing 5% new born
`calf serum, penicillin and streptomycin as described in detail earlier
`[8]. Cells were plated in 24-well culture dishes at a concentration of
`104 cells/well, and were used at approximately 75-90°A confluency,
`after 4-7 days in culture.
`
`2.2. Purification and radiolabeling of ST peptides
`STh peptide was purified from the culture supernatant of E. coli
`cells which overproduced the toxin, as described earlier [10]. Purified
`peptides were quantitated by aminoacid analysis [11]. An analog of
`STh, STY72F, was used as the radioligand for receptor-binding anal-
`ysis, and was prepared as reported earlier in detail [9]. The specific
`activity of the radiolabeled STY72F was 2000 Ci/mmol, and the ra-
`diolabeled peptide was used within a month of preparation.
`
`2.3. Desensitization of T84 cells
`Cells were grown to confluence in 24-well plates and incubated with
`the STh (3 X IV' M) for 18 h in serum-free DMEM :F12 at 37°C in a
`5% CO, humidified incubator. Wells were washed thrice with warm,
`serum-free medium and incubated with the same medium in the ab-
`sence of any PDE inhibitor, or in the presence of either 1 mM IBMX,
`or the specific PDE inhibitors zaprinast, phenothiazine, milrinone or
`Ro 20-1724 (50 µM), for 30 mM at 37°C. Cells were then restimulat-
`ed for 15 mM at 37°C with STh (3 x10-7 M) and the reaction
`was terminated by aspiration of media and addition of 0.1 M citric
`
`0014-5793/97/$17.00 © 1997 Federation of European Biochemical Societies. All rights reserved.
`PH 50014-5793(97)00458 -4
`
`MYLAN EXHIBIT - 1038
`Mylan Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Bausch Health Ireland, Ltd. - IPR2022-00722
`
`

`

`346
`
`M.M. Bakre, S.S. Visweswariah I FEBS Letters 408 (1997) 345-349
`
`acid to each well. Cells were lysed, and cGMP in the lysates meas-
`ured without succinylation of the samples by radioimmunoassays us-
`ing 125I-labeled cGMP prepared as described previously [12]. Stimu-
`lation for 15 mM with this concentration of STh produce low or
`undetectable levels of cGMP in the extracellular medium of the cells
`[8]•
`
`2.4. Preparation of membranes from T84 cells and guanylyl cyclase
`assays
`Membranes were prepared from cell lysates (100 000 g pellet) of
`confluent cultures of T84 cells, following prior exposure of mono-
`layers to STh (3 x 10-7 M) or medium [9], and used for the measure-
`ment of labeled STY72F-binding activity as well as guanylyl cyclase
`activity. To monitor the receptor in membranes prepared from control
`and desensitized cells, membrane protein (50 µg) was incubated with
`radiolabeled STY72F peptide (10-1' M) in the presence or absence of
`unlabeled STh (10-7 M) as described earlier, [9], and then filtered
`through GF/C filters. For in vitro guanylyl cyclase assays, membrane
`protein (50 µg) was incubated in the presence or absence of STh (10-6
`M) in 60 mM Tris-HC1 buffer, pH 7.6, along with 4 mM MgCl2,
`2 mM GTP, 500 µM IBMX and a GTP regenerating system consist-
`ing of 20 µg creatine phosphokinase and 7.5 mM creatine phosphate.
`In some cases, membranes were treated with 0.3% Lubrol-PX for 10
`mM at 25°C before addition of substrate. MnCl2 (4 mM), which is
`known to activate the receptor non-specifically [13] was also used in
`some cases instead of MgCl2. Incubations were continued for 10 min
`at 37°C and the reaction terminated by the addition of 400 ml of 50
`mM sodium acetate buffer, pH 4.5. Samples were heated in a boiling
`water bath for 10 mM, and the supernatant taken for assay of cGMP.
`
`2.5. In vitro PDE assays
`Cells were cultured in 24-well dishes and exposed to STh (3 X 10-7
`M) for 18 h. Cell monolayers were washed in serum-free medium, and
`harvested in 50 mM Tris-HC1, pH 7.5, containing 1 µg/m1 leupeptin,
`1 mM benzamidine, 2 mM EDTA, 10 nM okadaic acid, 10 mM
`sodium vanadate and 5 mM 2-mercaptoethanol. The cells were ho-
`mogenized and homogenates were used for assay of PDE activity, in
`the absence or presence of zaprinast (20 µM). The assay was per-
`formed essentially as described earlier, with some modifications
`[14,15]. Assay mixtures contained 50 mM Tris-HC1 buffer, pH 8.0,
`containing 10 mM MgCl2, 300 µg/m1 bovine serum albumin and
`150 000-200 000 cpm 3H-cGMP (0.2 µM) (New England Nuclear,
`USA) which had been purified earlier by ion exchange chromatogra-
`phy [16]. Assays were conducted for 15 mM at 30°C, following which
`the samples were boiled for 5 min. Crotalus vulgaris snake venom
`toxin was added (20 µg/tube), and incubation continued for a further
`30 mM. 3H-guanosine generated was monitored by ion exchange chro-
`matography through DEAE-Sephadex A-25, which had been equil-
`ibrated with 20 mM ammonium formate [16].
`
`3. Results
`
`Application of STh to T84 cells leads to a rapid elevation of
`intracellular cGMP in cells, which declines 3 h following ad-
`dition of STh [8]. We exposed T84 cells to STh for 18 h and
`then restimulated the cells with fresh peptide. The intracellular
`levels of cGMP at the end of 18 h were low, and addition of
`fresh STh did not lead to a significant increase in intracellular
`cGMP levels (Fig. 1A), indicating cellular desensitization.
`High levels ( > 500 pmol) of cGMP were detected in the ex-
`tracellular medium, indicating that the cells had responded to
`STh over 18 h, and much of the cGMP produced during that
`time had been secreted by the cells. The low intracellular levels
`of cGMP after 18 h of incubation with STh could be due to
`degradation of STh over 18 h. We therefore compared cGMP
`production induced by STh present in the spent medium of
`cells which had been exposed to STh for 18 h, with that
`following application of fresh STh. As can be seen in Fig.
`1B, no significant difference in the levels of cGMP production
`was observed, indicating that low levels of cGMP within cells
`following 18 h incubation with STh could not be attributed to
`degradation of peptide during the period of the incubation.
`To detect receptor internalization and degradation as a
`means of contributing to the desensitization of T84 cells, we
`monitored radiolabeled STY72F binding to membranes pre-
`pared from control and desensitized cells. Results showed no
`significant reduction in the binding in desensitized membranes
`when compared to the control membranes (Fig. 2A; P> 0.1),
`and therefore a reduction in total receptor content could not
`account for the > 90% reduction in cGMP accumulation in
`desensitized cells. This suggested that intracellular changes,
`either at the level of synthesis or degradation of cGMP, had
`occurred in T84 cells resulting in the refractoriness to further
`STh stimulation.
`We first investigated GCC desensitization in terms of its
`ability to synthesize cGMP and performed in vitro guanylyl
`cyclase assays with membranes prepared from control and
`desensitized cells. Detergents are known to be non-specific
`activators of membrane associated guanylyl cyclases, even in
`the absence of ligand and this has also been observed in the
`case of GCC [13]. We preincubated membrane preparations
`
`(a)
`
`(1) 100
`
`T
`
`120
`
`90
`
`(b) T
`
`—
`
`I
`
`I
`
`—
`
`0
`
`2
`
`3
`
`75
`
`50
`
`a_
`0 ""w's
`U CD
`O 25
`a.
`
`0
`Preincubation
`Stimulation
`
`Fig. 1. Homologous desensitization of the T84 cells. A: Confluent monolayers of T84 cells were incubated with STh (3 X 10-7 M) for 18 h.
`Cells were washed and cGMP levels monitored with or without restimulation with STh (3 X 10-7 M). Control cells were incubated in medium
`without serum and basal cGMP levels measured directly, or on stimulation with STh. Values represent the mean ± S.D. of duplicate determina-
`tions with each experiment repeated thrice. B: To check the degradation of STh peptide remaining in the culture supernatant, confluent T84
`cells were stimulated with (1) STh (3 X 10-7 M), (2) STh remaining in the culture supernatant after 18 h incubation with T84 cells and (3) STh
`incubated at 37°C without cells for 18 h. cGMP was monitored by radioimmunoassay. Values represent the mean S.D., with each experiment
`repeated twice and each well assayed in duplicate. *: P> 0.5 when compared with 1.
`
`

`

`M. M. Bakre, S. S.
`
`VisweswariahlFEBS Letters 408 (1997) 345-349
`
`347
`
`*
`
`(C)
`
`25
`
`20-
`
`15-
`
`10-
`
`5-
`
`cGMP (pmois/min/mg protein)
`
`150
`
`(b)
`2 125-
`E 100-
`79 75_
`O
`
`_L
`
`50-
`(7, 25
`
`12500
`
`(a)
`
`10000
`
`7500
`
`5000
`
`2500
`
`Specific binding (cpm)
`
`0.3% Lubrol Mn-GTP
`
`0
`
`0
`
`+STh
`-STh
`Fig. 2. GCC activity in desensitized cells. Confluent monolayers were preincubated either in the absence (open bars) or presence (closed bars)
`of STh (3 X 10-7 M) for 18 h, prior to membrane preparation. Membrane protein (50 µg) was used for binding assays or in vitro guanylyl cy-
`clase assays. A: Membrane protein was incubated with 125I-labeled STY72F (100 000 cpm) for 1 h in the absence or presence of STh (10-7 M)
`unlabeled STh peptide, and receptor associated radioactivity monitored following filtration. Values represent the mean ± S.D. of triplicate deter-
`minations with each assay repeated twice. B: Membranes were treated with 0.3% Lubrol-PX for 10 min prior to addition of MgGTP, or
`treated with MnGTP independently. Values represent the mean ± S.D. of duplicate determinations with each experiment repeated twice.
`C: Membrane protein was treated with STh (10-6 M) and cGMP produced was monitored. Values represent the mean S.D. of duplicate de-
`terminations with each experiment repeated twice. *: P < 0.001.
`
`cate that restimulation of desensitized cells in the presence of
`IBMX restored cGMP accumulation close to levels observed
`in control cells. Interestingly, only zaprinast, a specific inhib-
`itor of the cGMP-binding, cGMP-specific (Type V) PDE,
`when added to desensitized cells prior to ST restimulation,
`could restore cGMP levels to those observed with IBMX,
`clearly indicating that the increased activity of this specific
`Type V PDE was responsible for the efficient degradation of
`cGMP in desensitized cells. No specific inhibitor is available
`for the cGMP-stimulated PDE, but our results with zaprinast
`suggest that a major contribution to enhanced cGMP degra-
`
`Control
`IIIIII Desensitized
`
`200
`
`U)
`a)
`0 150-
`c D
`
`100-
`
`IL
`0_
`O2 50-
`O
`
`Q
`Cu
`
`C
`N ca
`0
`C
`a)
`_c
`
`Ro 20-1724
`
`2
`
`C (1)
`O
`C
`
`X
`
`L_
`O
`_o
`
`C
`O
`z
`
`.0
`1E
`C
`O z
`
`Fig. 3. Role of phosphodiesterases in inducing refractoriness to STh
`in T84 cells. Confluent monolayers were preincubated without or
`with STh (3 X 10-7 M) for 18 h. Cells were washed, incubated with
`no phosphodiesterase inhibitor, 1 mM IBMX or specific inhibitors
`as indicated (50 µM) for 30 min and restimulated with STh. cGMP
`levels were monitored and values represent the mean ± S.D. of tripli-
`cate experiments with each well treated in duplicate. *: P > 0.5.
`
`from control and desensitized cells with Lubrol-PX (0.3%)
`and then monitored guanylyl cyclase activity. As shown in
`Fig. 2B, detergent treated membranes prepared from desensi-
`tized cells demonstrated no significant reduction in guanylyl
`cyclase activity (P > 0.7). Membranes prepared from desensi-
`tized cells also did not show any difference in guanylyl cyclase
`activity in the presence of MnGTP, another non-specific acti-
`vator of membrane associated guanylyl cyclase [13]. These
`results indicate that the general guanylyl cyclase catalytic ac-
`tivity of the receptor is retained on desensitization. It is perti-
`nent to mention here that in T84 cells, the only membrane
`associated guanylyl cyclase activity observed is that of GCC
`[8]
`We then investigated the sensitivity of GCC to STh stim-
`ulation in membranes prepared from control and desensitized
`cells. As shown in Fig. 2C, basal activities in both membrane
`preparations remained similar. However, STh-stimulatable
`guanylyl cyclase activity was significantly reduced to nearly
`50% of control values, in desensitized cells (P < 0.001), and
`STh addition only marginally increased cGMP production
`over basal values. This indicates that an important contribu-
`tion to cellular refractoriness is rcccptor desensitization in
`terms of a reduced sensitivity of the receptor to STh.
`A reduction in the accumulation of cGMP in desensitized
`cells could also be contributed by an increased rate of degra-
`dation of cGMP in desensitized T84 cells. A large family of
`PDEs are found in various cell types and while some are
`specific for cAMP or cGMP, others are dual specific and
`degrade both cGMP and cAMP with near equal efficiency
`[17-19]. A number of specific inhibitors are available for the
`various classes of PDEs, which allow the identification of a
`specific PDE responsible for cAMP or cGMP degradation.
`We therefore stimulated desensitized and control cells with
`STh, in the presence and absence of the general PDE inhib-
`itor, IBMX, as well as inhibitors for the Ca+-calmodulin-de-
`pendent PDE (phenothiazine), the cGMP-inhibited PDE (mil-
`rinone), the cAMP-specific PDE (Ro 20-1724 and zaprinast
`(cGMP-specific PDE) [17]. The results shown in Fig. 3 indi-
`
`

`

`348
`
`M. M. Bakre, S. S. VisweswariahlFEBS Letters 408 (1997) 345-349
`
` Control
`MI Desensitized
`
`10
`9
`8
`V lb
`w 4-,
`o 7
`6
`E
`-"c 5
`4
`
`Cy)
`
`ch i
`
`fl.
`
`3
`2
`1
`0
`
`Zaprinast
`
`-
`
`Fig. 4. In vitro phosphodiesterase activity in desensitized cells.
`Monolayers of T84 cells were incubated in serum-free medium either
`in the absence or presence of STh (3 x 10-7 M) for 18 h at 37°C.
`Cells were washed with serum-free medium and lysed as described
`in experimental procedures. Cell extracts prepared from desensitized
`and control cells were then used to perform in vitro PDE assays,
`in the presence or absence of 10 µM zaprinast. Values represent
`the mean of duplicate determinations of three experiments ± S.D.
`*: P<0.001.
`
`dation in desensitized cells is through the Type V PDE. To
`our knowledge, this is the first report on the contribution of
`enhanced PDE activity towards inducing refractoriness in any
`cGMP-mediated system, and also the first report on the role
`of the Type V PDE in regulating cGMP degradation in a
`cGMP responsive cell in this manner.
`The increased PDE activity observed in vivo should be
`detectable in cell extracts prepared from desensitized cells.
`We therefore prepared cell homogenates from control and
`desensitized cells and measured PDE activity in the extracts.
`As shown in Fig. 4, the activity observed in desensitized cell
`extracts is 2-fold higher than in control cells. This albeit mod-
`est increase in activity could nevertheless be significant in
`vivo, when coupled with reduced receptor activity in terms
`of synthesizing cGMP (Fig. 2). The enhanced enzyme activity
`observed in desensitized cells was inhibited by zaprinast, con-
`firming that the major PDE activity we have measured is
`contributed by the Type V cGMP-specific PDE (Fig. 4).
`
`4. Discussion
`
`In this report, we demonstrate that the human colonic T84
`cell line is refractory to prolonged exposure to the ST pep-
`tides, and this refractoriness is a result of receptor desensiti-
`zation and the increased activity of a cGB-PDE. To our
`knowledge, the only other well documented report on the
`hyperactivation of a PDE inducing refractoriness in a cell is
`the observation that prolonged exposure of follicle stimulating
`hormone to Sertoli cells reduces the ability of these cells to
`respond to the hormone in terms of cAMP accumulation [7].
`This refractoriness is brought about by the activation of a
`specific cAMP PDE, the Type IV PDE [21,22], and increased
`activity was detected in crude lysates prepared from cells.
`
`Hyperactivation in the case of the Type IV enzyme is through
`the increased transcription of the mRNA for this enzyme, and
`possibly also phosphorylation [22]. A second example indi-
`cates a rapid regulation of the cAMP-specific PDE by forsko-
`lin and isoproterenol in astroglial cells, where the increase in
`enzyme activity in the cytosol of cells is also of the order of 2-
`fold, as we have seen in the case of the Type V PDE [23],
`through a mechanism involving changes in the phosphoryla-
`tion of the Type IV enzyme.
`Till date, the human cDNA for the Type V enzyme has not
`been cloned, and the only available cDNA for this enzyme
`represents the enzyme present in the bovine lung [24].
`Whether this bovine cDNA has homology to the human
`gene is not known, and we are presently investigating such
`a possibility. This should allow us to investigate regulation of
`the enzyme activity at the level of transcription. The bovine
`enzyme has consensus sites for phosphorylation by cAMP-
`dependent kinase [24]. Changes in the phosphorylation of
`the Type V enzyme could also contribute to the increased
`PDE activity observed in desensitized cells, and it has been
`shown that phosphorylation of the Type V PDE by protein
`kinase A in vitro leads to an increase in the Vmax [15] of the
`enzyme. Whether this occurs in T84 cells remains to be inves-
`tigated.
`We have shown here that there is a significant reduction in
`the STh-stimulatable guanylyl cyclase activity of the receptor
`following exposure to ST peptide, with a marked reduction in
`sensitivity to STh, if one considers basal activities in control
`and desensitized cells. However, in whole cells, STh-stimu-
`lated cGMP levels seem to approach control values when
`desensitized cells were restimulated in the presence of IBMX
`and zaprinast (Fig. 3). This suggests low receptor desensitiza-
`tion in intact cells, which could be due to reactivation of the
`receptor by additional cellular machinery. The receptor gua-
`nylyl cyclases appear to be desensitized by a mechanism of
`dephosphorylation of the receptor, perhaps through the in-
`volvement of a specific phosphatase [25,26]. In the case of
`the receptor for the atrial natriuretic factor, receptor internal-
`ization has also been observed in certain cells [27]. More re-
`cently, there is evidence of a cGMP-mediated reduction in the
`level of the receptor mRNA in cells exposed to the atrial
`natriuretic peptide for prolonged periods of time [28]. Our
`report is the first to suggest that the ST receptor is desensi-
`tized but we do not find a significant degree of internalization
`of the receptor in T84 cells. This is in agreement with a recent
`report indicating efficient internalization and recycling of the
`receptor in T84 cells along with the ST peptide, without deg-
`radation of either the receptor or the peptide [29]. Whether
`the reduction in receptor sensitivity to STh that we have ob-
`served is correlated with a change in the phosphorylation of
`the receptor remains to be investigated. We have recently
`generated polyclonal antibodies to the extracellular domain
`of the receptor which should prove useful in such studies [30].
`Stable toxin diarrheas have been observed to be transitory
`in vivo [20]. Thus, in the only valid in vivo assay for the ST
`peptides, the suckling mouse assay, fluid accumulation in the
`intestine of the suckling mouse is observed maximally 3 h
`following ST administration after which there is a gradual
`decline in the fluid content of the intestine [20]. We suggest
`that the enhanced degradation of the cGMP occurring in in-
`testinal cells reported here, could contribute along with recep-
`tor desensitization, to the decline in fluid secretion, perhaps at
`
`

`

`M.M Bakre, S. S. Visweswariah I FEBS Letters 408 (1997) 345-349
`
`349
`
`the level of chloride secretion. It remains to be seen whether
`the refractoriness that we observe in terms of cGMP produc-
`tion is reflected at the level of chloride secretion in desensi-
`tized cells. Our results indicate that the regulation of cGMP
`accumulation in the intestinal cell could be through its degra-
`dation rather than its synthesis by the receptor. This may be
`an essential requirement, since guanylin [31], the endogenous
`ligand for GCC, mediates its action through the same recep-
`tor. Hence a major decrease in ST receptor activity would
`curtail guanylin action in maintaining and regulating ion ho-
`meostasis in the intestine.
`
`Acknowledgements: We acknowledge the help of B.M. Garrett and N.
`Roy for the purification and radiolabeling of ST peptides. We also
`acknowledge the help of Ms. Vasanthi Ramachandran who initiated
`some of these studies. M.M.B. is sponsored by the University Grants
`Commission, Government of India. This work was supported by fi-
`nancial assistance from the Council for Scientific and Industrial Re-
`asearch, Government of India.
`
`References
`
`[1]
`[2]
`
`[3]
`
`[4]
`
`[5]
`
`[6]
`[7]
`
`[8]
`
`[9]
`
`[10]
`
`M.M. Levine, J. Infect. Dis. 155 (1987) 377-389.
`C.A. Chao, F.J. de Sauvage, Y.J. Dong, J.A. Wagner, D.V.
`Goeddel, P. Gardner, EMBO J. 13 (1994) 1065-1072.
`S. Schulz, C.K. Green, P.T. Yuen, D. Garbers, Cell 64 (1991)
`941-948.
`F.J. de Sauvage, T.R. Camerato, D.V. Goeddel, J. Biol. Chem.
`266 (1991) 17912-17918.
`S. Singh, G. Singh, J.M. Heim, R. Gerzer, Biochem. Biophys.
`Res. Commun. 179 (1991) 1455-1463.
`J.G. Drewett, D.L. Garbers, Endocr. Rev. 15 (1994) 135-160.
`M. Conti, M.V. Toscano, L. Petrelli, R. Geremia, M. Stefanini,
`Endocrinology 110 (1982) 1189-1196.
`S.S. Visweswariah, G. Shanthi, T.S. Balganesh, Microb. Patho-
`gen. 12 (1992) 209-218.
`S.S. Visweswariah, V. Ramachandran, S. Ramamohan, G. Das,
`J. Ramachandran, Eur. J. Biochem. 219 (1994) 727-736.
`P. Dwarkanath, S.S. Visweswariah, Y.V.B.K. Subrahmanyam,
`
`G. Shanthi, H.M. Jagannatha, T.S. Balganesh, Gene 81 (1989)
`219-226.
`[11] B.A. Bidlingmeyer, S.A. Cohen, T.L. Tarvin, J. Chromatog. 36
`(1984) 93-104.
`[12] G. Brooker, J.F. Harper, W.L. Terasaki, R.D. Moylan, Adv.
`Cyclic. Nucleotide Res. 10 (1979) 1-33.
`[13] C.S. Ramrao, D.L. Garbers, J. Biol. Chem. 263 (1988) 1524-
`1529.
`[14] M.K. Thomas, S.H. Francis, J.D. Corbin, J. Biol. Chem. 265
`(1990) 14964-14970.
`[15] I. Burns, W. Rodger, N.J. Pyne, Biochem. J. 283 (1992) 487-491.
`[16] R.L. Kincaid, V.C. Manganiello, Methods Enzymol. 159 (1988)
`457-461.
`[17] M. Conti, G. Nemoz, C. Sette, E. Vicini, Endocr. Rev. 16 (1995)
`370-389.
`[18] J.A. Beavo, Methods Enzymol. 159 (1988) 1-38.
`[19] J.A. Beavo, Physiol. Rev. 75 (1995) 725-748.
`[20] H. Kubota, Y. Hidaka, H. Ozaki, H. Ito, T. Hirayama, Y. Take-
`da, Y. Shimonishi, Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 161 (1989)
`229-235.
`[21] M. Conti, M.V. Toscano, L. Petrelli, R. Geremia, M. Stefanini,
`Endocrinology 113 (1983) 1845-1853.
`[22] C. Sette, E. Vicini, M. Conti, J. Biol. Chem. 269 (1994) 18271-
`18274.
`[23] V. Madelian, E. La Vigne, Biochem. Pharmacol. 51 (1996) 1739-
`1747.
`[24] L.N. McAllister-Luca, W.K. Sonnenburg, A. Kadleck, D. Seger,
`H.L. Trong, J.L. Colbran, M.K. Thomas, K.A. Walsh, S.H.
`Francis, J.D. Corbin, J.A. Beavo, J. Biol. Chem. 268 (1993)
`22863-22873.
`[25] L.R. Potter, D.L. Garbers, J. Biol. Chem. 7 (1992) 14531-14534.
`[26] L.R. Potter, D.L. Garbers, J. Biol. Chem. 26 (1994) 14636-
`14641.
`[27] K.N. Pandey, J. Biol. Chem. 8 (1993) 4380-4390.
`[28] L. Chao, J. Wu, D.G. Gardner, J. Biol. Chem. 270 (1995) 24891-
`24897.
`[29] R. Urbanski, S.L. Carrithers, S.A. Waldman, Biochym. Biophys.
`Acta 1249 (1995) 29-36.
`[30] A. Nandi, R. Mathew, S.S. Visweswariah, Prot. Exp. Purifn. 8
`(1996) 151-159.
`[31] M.G. Currie, K.F. Fok, J. Kato, R.J. Moore, F.K. Hamra, K.L.
`Duffin, C.E. Smith, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 89 (1992) 947-
`951.
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket