throbber
Biochemical Pharmacology, Vol. 41, No. 12, pp. 1879-1886, 1991
`Printed in Great Britain.
`
`0006-2952/91 S3.00 + 0.03
`Pergamon Press plc
`
`STIMULATION OF SECRETION BY THE T84 COLONIC
`EPITHELIAL CELL LINE WITH DIETARY FLAVONOLS
`
`TOAN D. NGUYEN,* ANDREW T. CANADA,1' GREGORY G. HEINTZ, THOMAS W. GETTYS
`and JONATHAN A. COHN
`Departments of Medicine and t Anesthesiology, Duke University School of Medicine and Durham
`V.A. Medical Center, Durham, NC, U.S.A.
`
`(Received 26 July 1990; accepted 3 January 1991)
`
`Abstract—Flavonols are dietary compounds widely distributed in plants and characterized by a 2-
`phenyl-benzo(a)pyrane nucleus possessing hydroxyl and ketone groups at positions 3 and 4, respectively.
`Kaempferol, quercetin, and myricetin are flavonols that are further mono-, di-, or trihydroxylated on
`the phenyl ring, respectively. To test whether these ingested flavonols might exert a direct secretory
`effect on intestinal epithelial cells, monolayers of the T8,, colonocyte cell line were mounted in Ussing
`chambers and examined for ion transport response. Twenty minutes after addition of 100 µM quercetin
`to either the serosal or mucosal side, the short-circuit current change was maximal at 16.6 µA/cm2.
`Kaempferol was less potent than quercetin, while myricetin and glycosylated quercetin (rutin) did not
`induce secretion. The secretion induced by quercetin did not seem to be mediated by the reactive
`oxygen species generated by quercetin through auto-oxidation and/or redox cycling (superoxide,
`hydrogen peroxide, and the hydroxyl radical) because it was neither enhanced by iron, nor inhibited
`by desferroxamine B or catalase (alone or in combination with superoxide dismutase). Like vasoactive
`intestinal peptide, quercetin induced a secretory response that was inhibited by barium chloride and
`bumetanide, and which exhibited synergism with carbachol. Quercetin also stimulated a modest increase
`in intracellular cAMP levels and the phosphorylation of endogenous protein substrates for cAMP-
`dependent protein kinase. Thus, quercetin is a potent stimulus of colonocyte secretion that resembles
`secretagogues which act via a cAMP-mediated signaling pathway.
`
`Flavonoids constitute a class of compounds which
`contain the basic structural feature of a 2-phenyl-
`benzo(a)pyrane nucleus (Fig. 1). Either as free
`aglycones or more commonly glycosylated at carbons
`3,4, or 7, these compounds are universally distributed
`among vascular plants where they may serve as
`natural transport regulators for the plant growth
`substance auxin [1]. Flavonols are a subgroup of the
`flavonoids, characterized by a hydroxyl group at
`position 3 and a ketone at position 4. Flavonols can
`be further hydroxylated at positions 3', 4' or 5' on
`the # phenyl ring to yield the 4'-monohydroxy-
`flavonol kaempferol, the 3 ' ,4' -dihydroxy-flavonoi
`quercetin, and the 3' ,4' ,5'-trihydroxy-flavonol myr-
`icetin (Fig. 1). Both quercetin and myricetin produce
`reactive oxygen species (superoxide, hydrogen
`peroxide, and hydroxyl radical) through auto-
`oxidation and redox cycling [2-4]. Since reactive
`oxygen species may induce intestinal secretion [5, 6],
`we examined the possibility that flavonols might act
`on the intestinal epithelial cell to stimulate ion
`transport.
`In this study, the colonic epithelial cell line TM
`was used as a model to study the effects of flavonols
`on the enterocyte. These cells grow as well-
`differentiated monolayers which exhibit vectorial
`chloride secretion when mounted in Ussing chambers
`and exposed to a variety of neurohormonal stimuli
`[7]. Chloride secretion, monitored by a change in
`
`* Correspondence: Toan D. Nguyen, M.D., Building 2,
`2nd Floor, V.A. Medical Center, 508 Fulton St., Durham,
`NC 27705.
`
`the short-circuit current (Isc) necessary to nullify the
`potential difference across the cell monolayer, is
`stimulated by agents which increase cAMP, such as
`vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP) or prostaglandin
`El [8, 9], and also by agents which act through Ca2+-
`mediated pathways, such as carbachol, histamine
`and calcium ionophores [10, 11]. Chloride secretion
`occurs through Cl- channels located on the apical
`membrane of confluent monolayers [12], and is the
`result of the Cl- electrochemical gradient generated
`by the concerted action of three transporters: the
`basolateral
`isia+,K+,C1-
`co-transporter,
`the
`Na+,K+-ATPase pump, and K+ channels [9]. The
`Na+ and K+
`imported
`into the cell by the
`co-transporter are recycled to the extracellular
`compartment, respectively, by the Na+ ,K+-ATPase
`pump and by at least two distinct K+ efflux channels
`(activated separately by VIP and by carbachol).
`Because the secretory response in T84 cells is well
`characterized and reflects the direct action of
`secretagogues on the enterocyte, we chose this model
`to characterize the effects of dietary flavonols on
`colonic secretion.
`
`MATERIALS AND METHODS
`
`Chemicals. Quercetin, kaempferol, myricetin,
`rutin, barium chloride, superoxide dismutase (SOD)
`(from bovine erythrocytes), catalase (from bovine
`liver), desferroxamine B, carbachol, and Fe(III)-
`EDTA were obtained from Sigma, St. Louis, MO.
`Bumetanide was provided by Biomol Research
`Laboratories, Plymouth Landing, PA. VIP was from
`Peninsula, Belmont, CA. 32P as inorganic phosphate
`
`1879
`
`MYLAN EXHIBIT - 1036
`Mylan Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Bausch Health Ireland, Ltd. - IPR2022-00722
`
`

`

`1880
`
`T. D. NGUYEN et al.
`
`penicillin, and 5000 µg/L streptomycin sulfate) to
`bathe both sides of the cell monolayer. The
`confluent monolayers used for secretory studies were
`maintained for at least 7 days after the filters were
`seeded.
`Secretory studies. The cell monolayers on the
`filter/ring units were mounted in a modified Ussing
`chamber as previously described [7], and both sides
`of the monolayer were bathed with a Ringer's
`solution containing 115 mM NaC1, 1.2 mM CaC12,
`1.2 mM MgC12, 0.4 mM KH2PO4, 2.5 mM K2HPO4,
`25 mM NaHCO3, and 10 mM glucose. Quercetin,
`myricetin, and kaempferol were dissolved in ethanol
`and added to the Ringer's solution at a 1 : 100 dilution
`(final concentrations of ethanol 1%). The medium
`was warmed to 37° with a circulating water jacket
`and gently mixed and oxygenated with a constant
`inflow of 95%O2/5%CO,. During secretory studies,
`spontaneous tissue potential differences were short-
`circuited by an automatic voltage clamp (model
`DVC-1000, World Precision Instruments, New
`Haven, CT) with Ag-AgCl2 electrodes, and the
`current necessary to maintain this short circuit (Ise)
`recorded at 1-min intervals. Instrument calibration
`was performed prior to each experiment using a
`filter/ring unit without cells. All comparative studies
`used matched pairs of monolayers seeded at the
`same time and studied concurrently. Spot checks of
`the T84 monolayers after completion of
`the
`experiments showed that cells exposed to 100 µM
`quercetin for > 1 hr could still exclude trypan blue.
`Cellular protein phosphorylation. T84 cell protein
`phosphorylation
`responses were studied using
`methods previously described [13]. Briefly, cells
`were labeled with 32P, in a phosphate-free buffer,
`exposed to 100 µM quercetin for 5 min, scraped from
`the filters, and homogenized with a glass—Teflon
`homogenizer. Phosphoproteins contained in the
`supernatant fraction after centrifugation at 436,000g
`for 15 min were precipitated with 10% trichloroacetic
`acid and resolved by two-dimensional polyacrylamide
`gel electrophoresis. Phosphoproteins were detected
`by autoradiography using X-OMAT AR5 film
`exposed at room temperature.
`cAMP Assay. T84 cells grown to confluence on
`filters were washed twice with Ringer's solution and
`immersed in 15 mL of Ringer's solution supplemented
`with 0.2 mM 3-isobutyl-1-methylxanthine and 10 mM
`glucose, warmed to 37°, and equilibrated with 95%
`O2, 5% CO2. Quercetin (final concentration 100 µM)
`or VIP (final concentration 1 nM) was added to the
`solution, and after different time periods, the
`filters containing the cells were transferred into
`12 mm x 75 mm plastic tubes and placed in liquid
`nitrogen. The cAMP was then extracted by boiling
`the cells for 7 min in 1 mL of 5 mM KH,PO4, 5 mM
`K2HPO4, 1 mM EDTA, and 0.1 mM 3-isobutyl-1-
`methylxanthine. The supernatant resulting from
`centrifugation at 15,000g for 7.5 min was assayed
`for cAMP according to the method described by
`Gettys et al. [14].
`
`RESULTS
`
`Stimulation of secretion with flavonols. As shown
`in Fig. 2, addition of 100µM quercetin to the mucosal
`
`A FLAVONOIDS
`
`B FLAVONOLS
`
`8
`
`0
`
`H
`
`lel
`
`
`
`0
`
`O -OH
`
`T
`
`OH
`
`fi
`
`0
`
`OH
`
`C KAEMPFEROL
`
`OH
`
`0 H
`
`0
`
`°H
`
`OH
`
`0
`
`I
`
`OH
`
`OUERCET1N
`
`0
`
`O
`
`E MYRICET1N
`
`T
`OH
`
`°H
`
`O
`Fig. 1. Chemical structures of flavonoids (A), flavonols
`(B), kaempferol (C), quercetin (D), and myricetin (E).
`
`was obtained from ICN, Irvine, CA. Culture medium
`was obtained from the Tissue Culture Facility of the
`University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, or
`from Gibco, Grand Island, NY.
`Growth and maintenance of T84 cells. T84 cells
`were provided by Dr. K. Dharmsathaphorn
`(University of California, San Diego). These cells
`were cultured at 5% CO2 and 37° in a 1 : 1 mixture
`of Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium and Ham's
`F-12 medium supplemented with 5% (v/v) newborn
`calf serum. Cells were seeded onto collagen-coated
`Nuclepore filters previously glued onto plastic rings
`(surface area: 2.9 cm', approximately 106 cells/
`filter). These filters were then set on glass beads to
`allow medium (supplemented with 5000 units/L
`
`

`

`Stimulation of T8,4 cell secretion with flavonols
`25
`
`(A)
`
`20 -
`
`Ouercetin
`100µM
`
`15
`
`N
`
`E
`< 10
`
`U
`2
`
`5
`
`N
`
`U
`
`% Maximal Ise increase
`
`10
`
`20
`
`40
`30
`Time (min)
`
`50
`
`60
`
`20 Quereelin
`
`N
`
`15
`E v 1n
`
`100µM
`-*-- 300µM
`
`(C)
`
`10
`
`20
`
`40
`30
`Time (min)
`
`50
`
`60
`
`1881
`
`10µM
`100 ptM
`
`(B)
`
`Ouercean
`
`11,
`
`20
`
`15
`
`10
`
`5
`
`0
`
`0
`
`10
`
`20
`30
`Time (min)
`
`40
`
`100
`
`80
`
`60
`
`40
`
`20
`
`Ouereettn
`100µM
`
`1
`
`Mucosal
`Serosal
`
`(D)
`
`20
`40
`Time (min)
`
`60
`
`Fig. 2. Secretory effect of quercetin. TM monolayers were grown to confluence on semipermeable
`membranes, mounted on modified Ussing chambers, and stimulated with quercetin as described in
`Materials and Methods. The resulting Isc's were recorded every minute and the resulting means and
`SEM (alternated for clarity in panels C and D) shown. Panel A (top left): Incubation with 100 µM
`quercetin added to the mucosal compartment (1-36 min: N = 47; 37-66 min: N = 20-46). Panel B (top
`right): Incubation with either 10 or 100µM quercetin added to the mucosal compartment (three matched
`pairs). Panel C (bottom left): Incubation with either 100 or 300 µM quercetin added to the mucosal
`compartment (three matched pairs). Panel D (bottom right): Incubation with 100 µM quercetin added
`to either the serosal or the mucosal side of the T84 cell monolayer. Within each of the seven matched
`pairs, the Isc increases were normalized using the maximal Isc increase; the resulting means and SEM
`are shown [mean maximal Isc response: 53 ± 8.7 µA (18 µA/cm2)].
`
`side of the cell monolayer produced an increase in
`Isc which peaked after 15-20 min to a maximum
`value above baseline of 16.6 µA/cm2(SEM = 0.9 µA/
`cm2, N = 48, 48.1 µA/filter). The Isc was unaffected
`in control filters exposed to ethanol alone at a final
`concentration of 1%.
`A threshold response to quercetin was obtained
`at 10µM (Fig. 2B). The maximal Isc increase
`produced by 300 µM quercetin was the same as that
`produced by 100 µM, but the response was more
`rapid in onset and shorter in duration (Fig. 2C). As
`shown in Fig. 2D, quercetin stimulated a similar
`secretory response whether added to the serosal or
`the mucosal side of the monolayer. However, the
`maximal response elicited from the serosal side was
`only 68% of the maximal response obtained from
`the mucosal side (P = 0.01 for a smaller serosal
`response, paired two-tailed t-test with 6 df, mean
`maximal mucosal Isc response: 11.9 ± 1.9 pA/cm2).
`The effects of flavonols structurally related to
`quercetin were also investigated. The maximal Isc
`increase observed with 100 µM kaempferol was
`26 ± 2%© of the maximal increase obtained with
`100 µM quercetin (three paired experiments). For
`myricetin, secretion was detected only at 300 µM
`and not at 100 µM. A minimal response was obtained
`with a 300µM concentration of the glycosylated
`quercetin-rutinoside (rutin) (data not shown).
`
`Effects of modulators of the metabolism of reactive
`oxygen species on quercetin-stimulated chloride
`secretion. It is possible that the reactive oxygen
`species (superoxide, hydrogen peroxide, or hydroxyl
`radical) produced by quercetin upon auto-oxidation
`and/or redox cycling may mediate its secretory
`effect. In this case, the Isc response should be altered
`by compounds or enzymes which modulate the
`production or degradation of these species. Quer-
`cetin-induced secretion was therefore studied after
`cells were preincubated with superoxide dismutase
`(SOD) (to enhance the conversion of superoxide to
`hydrogen peroxide), catalase (to enhance
`the
`conversion of hydrogen peroxide to water and
`oxygen), iron (to facilitate the Haber—Weiss reaction
`in which hydrogen peroxide is converted to hydroxyl
`radical), or desferroxamine B (to chelate iron and
`prevent the Haber—Weiss reaction). If quercetin-
`induced secretion is mediated by hydrogen peroxide,
`then catalase should inhibit the secretory response
`to quercetin. Similarly, if secretion is mediated by
`hydroxyl radical, then the Isc response should be
`inhibited by desferroxamine and enhanced by Fe3+.
`Finally,
`if extracellular superoxide is the key
`mediator, then secretion should be blocked by the
`combination of SOD and catalase. As shown in
`Table 1, little effect on quercetin-induced secretion
`was observed after preincubation with 50 µM
`
`

`

`1882
`
`T. D. NGUYEN et al.
`
`Table 1. Effects of modulators of the metabolism of reactive oxygen species on quercetin-
`induced secretion in Ts, cells
`
`Agent
`
`SOD (470 units/mL) + catalase (450 units/mL)
`Catalase (450 units/mL)
`Desferroxamine B (50 µM)
`Fe' (50 µM)
`
`Maximal Isc
`(% control)
`
`104 ± 12.6
`117 ± 7.8
`97 ± 5.6
`75 ± 9.2
`
`N
`
`6
`6
`6
`6
`
`P (* 100)
`
`0.78
`0.08
`0.68
`0.04
`
`T84 cells mounted in modified Ussing chambers were incubated with the different modulators
`of reactive oxygen species metabolism for 10-15 min, and quercetin was added to a final
`concentration of 100 µM. In each matched pair, the maximal short-circuit current (Isc) change
`induced by quercetin in the presence of the modulator is expressed as the percentage of the
`maximal Isc change induced by quercetin in the absence of the modulator. Values are means
`± SEM. The mean maximal Isc changes in the control monolayers were, respectively,
`21.9 ± 3.3, 15 ± 2.5, 15.8 ± 1.66, and 18.3 ± 2.7 µA/cm2 for the experiments studying the
`effects of SOD plus catalase, catalase, desferroxamine B, and Fe'. P values were calculated
`using two-tailed t-tests with 5 df.
`
`desferroxamine B or a combination of 470 units/
`mL SOD and 450 units/mL catalase. A slight
`enhancement in secretion, which did not reach
`statistical significance (0.1 > P > 0.05), was noted
`with 450 units/mL catalase, while 50 µM Fe(III)-
`EDTA produced a significant (P < 0.05) inhibition of
`quercetin-induced secretion. However, as discussed
`previously, these last two effects were opposite of
`what was expected should either hydrogen peroxide
`or the hydroxyl radical mediate secretion. In the
`aggregate, these findings do not support a role for
`reactive oxygen species in the secretory response of
`quercetin.
`Intracellular mechanism of secretion. TR4 cell apical
`chloride secretion is dependent on the chloride
`gradient across the mucosal membrane of the cell.
`This gradient
`is generated by the basolateral
`Na+,K+,C1+ co-transporter with the imported Na+
`and K+ recycled outside the cell by the Na+,K+-
`ATPase pump and K+ efflux channels [15]. The role
`of these transport systems in quercetin-induced
`chloride secretion was studied using bumetanide,
`which inhibits the Na+,K+,C1- co-transporter, and
`barium chloride, which inhibits a VIP-responsive K*
`channel [10, 16]. Table 2 demonstrates the inhibitory
`effects of 0.3 mM bumetanide and 6 mM BaCl2 on
`the secretory response elicited by 100 µM quercetin.
`Compared with matched controls, the Isc response
`obtained 20 min after addition of quercetin was only
`19 ± 1% and 31 ± 5% of the expected response for
`bumetanide and barium chloride, respectively. Thus,
`quercetin-induced secretion appears to require active
`Na+,K+ ,C1- co-transport and K+ efflux mechanisms.
`One approach to determining which intracellular
`signalling pathway(s) mediates
`the quercetin
`secretory response is to evaluate whether quercetin
`exhibits synergism when administered with other
`secretagogues. The interactions between carbachol,
`VIP, and quercetin were therefore studied. In Fig.
`3A, cells were exposed either
`to carbachol
`(final concentration 10 µM) or to quercetin (final
`concentration 50µM). After 15 min, quercetin was
`added to the cells previously exposed to carbachol
`and vice versa. In these matched pairs, the effect of
`
`Table 2. Effects of ion transport inhibitors on quercetin-
`induced secretion in TM cells
`
`Agent
`
`Isc
`(% control) N P (* 100)
`
`Bumetanide (0.3 mM)
`Barium chloride (6 mM)
`
`19 ± 1
`31 ± 5
`
`4
`4
`
`0.0001
`0.0007
`
`T84 cells were incubated for 15 min with either bumetanide
`or barium chloride, and quercetin was added to a final
`concentration of 100 µM. In each matched pair, the Isc
`change induced by quercetin after 20 min in the presence
`of the inhibitor is expressed as the percentage of the Isc
`change induced by querecetin alone. Bumetanide was
`dissolved in 0.1 M NaOH and added to the cells at a 1 : 100
`dilution; the corresponding control also contained 1 : 100
`dilution of 0.1 M NaOH. Values are means ± SEM. The
`maximal Isc responses in the control monolayers were
`12.1 ± 0.59 and 13.4 ± 1.2 µA/cm', respectively, for the
`experiments studying the effects of bumetanide and barium
`chloride. P values were calculated using two-tailed t-tests
`with 3 df.
`
`quercetin followed by carbachol (or carbachol
`followed by quercetin) in one monolayer can be
`compared to the initial effect of quercetin (or
`carbachol) alone in the other. Analyzed in this
`fashion, quercetin alone produced an Isc increase of
`9.4 ± 0.4 µA/cm2 (27 ± 1.2 µA, N = 3) after 15 min,
`while carbachol produced an Isc
`increase of
`2.3 ± 1 µA/cm- (7 ± 3.5 µA, N = 3) after 3 min.
`Carbachol added to cells responding maximally to
`quercetin produced an additional Isc increase of
`34.9 ± 5 µA/cm2 (101 ± 14.4 µA) resulting
`in a
`combined total Isc increase of 44.4 ± 5 µA/cm2
`(129 ± 14.4 µA). Quercetin added to cells previously
`exposed to carbachol produced an Isc increase of
`19.1 ± 1.7 µA/cm2 (55 ± 4.8 µA). However, in the
`latter case, quercetin was added after completion of
`the carbachol response and the interaction between
`quercetin and carbachol may be suboptimal. In
`additional experiments,
`the secretory response
`produced by a simultaneous dose of carbachol and
`
`

`

`(a) C
`(o)
`
`(II O
`(0) C
`(%)O8C
`
`E
`
`50
`
`40
`
`30
`
`20
`
`10
`
`Stimulation of T84 cell secretion with
`
`flavonols
`
`1883
`
`(A)
`
`(0) VIP
`1.)
`
`30
`
`20
`
`o
`
`E a
`
`(o) O
`(0) VIP
`
`V
`
`(B)
`
`r
`10
`
`e
`20
`
`•
`
`I
`50
`
`60
`
`40
`20
`30
`Time (min)
`
`50
`
`60
`
`1
`1
`40
`30
`Time (min)
`Fig. 3. Interactions between quercetin, carbachol and VIP. Pairs of confluent T84 monolayers were
`mounted in modified Ussing chambers and their secretory responses (mean Isc and SEM) compared.
`Panel A (left panel): In each pair, one monolayer was exposed to 10 µM carbachol [C] (serosal surface)
`or to 50 µM quercetin [Q] (mucosal surface); after 15 min, 50 µM quercetin was added to the monolayer
`previously exposed to carbachol and vice versa. Additional monolayers were also exposed to a combined
`concentration of 10µM carbachol and 50µM quercetin [Q&C]. The following symbols are used: (II)
`quercetin followed by carbachol (N = 3), (O) carbachol followed by quercetin (N = 3), (A) quercetin
`and carbachol added simultaneously (N = 5). Panel B (right panel): In each pair, one monolayer was
`exposed to 1 nM VIP (serosal surface) and the other to 50 µM quercetin [O] (mucosal surface). After
`15 min, 50 µM quercetin was added to the monolayer previously exposed to VIP and vice versa. The
`following symbols are used: (0) quercetin followed by VIP (N = 3), (O) VIP followed by quercetin
`(N = 3).
`
`quercetin was also evaluated. A peak Isc with an
`intermediate value of 23.6 ± 2.2 µA/cm2 (69
`6.5 µA, N = 5) was obtained 14 min after addition
`of the combined secretagogues. In all the different
`sequences, the Isc increases produced by cells
`exposed to the combination of quercetin and
`carbachol were greater than the sum of the individual
`Isc changes produced by quercetin and carbachol
`(9.4 ± 2.3 = 11.7 µA/cm2). The difference in the
`degrees of synergism probably reflects the different
`timing of the maximal effect of quercetin and
`carbachol. In contrast, as shown in Fig. 3B, when
`the interaction between quercetin and VIP was
`analyzed in the same fashion, no such synergism,
`but a possible inhibitory effect was demonstrated.
`The synergism between carbachol and quercetin,
`but not between VIP and quercetin, suggests that
`quercetin may induce secretion through pathways
`related to the ones activated by VIP, but not by
`carbachol. This possibility was explored further in
`the following phosphorylation studies.
`Phosphorylation and intracellular cAMP studies.
`Previous studies have shown that T84 cells exhibit
`distinct phosphorylation responses to stimuli acting
`via cAMP or via Ca2+ [13, 17]. Phosphoproteins p83,
`p29, and p23 are examples of proteins exhibiting
`increased phosphorylation in cells stimulated by
`agents which act via Ca2+ , such as carbachol,
`histamine, and ionomycin. By contrast, phos-
`phoproteins p37, p18, and p23 exhibit increased
`phosphorylation in cells exposed to agents which act
`via cAMP, such as VIP and forskolin. Each of these
`five phosphoproteins showed increased labeling in
`monolayers stimulated with forskolin plus carbachol
`(Fig. 4, comparing panels A and B). When
`monolayers were stimulated with 100 µM quercetin,
`only three of these five phosphorylation responses
`were observed: quercetin stimulated the phos-
`phorylation of p37, p18, and p23, but not p29 or p83
`(Fig. 4, comparing panels C and D). These results
`
`suggest that quercetin activates intracellular signaling
`mechanisms mediated by cAMP, but not by Ca2+.
`In an attempt to study whether quercetin induces
`the generation of cAMP, this second messenger was
`measured in cells exposed to 100 µM quercetin for
`different time periods ranging from 1 to 20 min.
`Surprisingly, as shown in Table 3, only a modest
`increase in cAMP levels was detected. These
`increases were minimal when compared with the
`mean 85-fold increase in cAMP demonstrated with
`control monolayers exposed to 1 nM VIP for the
`same time periods (data not shown).
`
`DISCUSSION
`
`We have demonstrated that quercetin is a potent
`stimulator of ion transport in T84 cells. When added
`to either the mucosal or serosal side of the cell
`monolayer, quercetin produced a concentration-
`dependent increase in Isc, which peaked 15-20 min
`after the addition of 100 µM quercetin. The observed
`Isc response is consistent with the possibility that
`quercetin can act directly on the enterocyte to
`secretion. Of the related
`stimulate electrogenic
`hydroxylated flavonols, kaempferol was less potent
`than quercetin, while myricetin and the glycosylated
`quercetin-rutinoside (rutin) produced minimal res-
`ponses. Considering the effective mucosal—serosal
`barrier, the observation that quercetin can act from
`either side of the monolayer suggests that its effect
`is not
`initially mediated by cellular surface
`components selectively present on either side of the
`cell (e.g. receptors). It is also possible that quercetin,
`being a small hydrophobic molecule, penetrated the
`cell and produced its effect intracellularly. The
`similar time courses of the secretory responses
`produced by the addition of quercetin to either side
`of the cell do not support the possibility that the
`effect of quercetin is localized to one side of the cell
`
`

`

`A
`
`p83.
`
`•
`
`•
`
`J
`p37
`
`•
`
`tb.
`p29t1
`
`A •
`dpi • *4
`p23
`
`
`•
`
`,p18
`
`•
`
`4401
`
`•
`
`*is
`
`0 w•
`
`711/
`
`1
`
`•
`
`•
`
`•
`
`•
`
`•
`
`•
`
`+0
`•
`- -IND
`•
`eisofillo
`0 , •
`
`•
`
`a
`
`•
`
`"ftvasCr,
`
`•
`
`t. •
`_4'6 a • de*
`„,•,6 • .4116
`
`'-*
`
`Fig. 4. Protein phosphorylation induced by quercetin. As described in Materials and Methods,
`monolayers were labeled with 32P and exposed to different stimuli for 5 min. Soluble phosphoproteins
`were then resolved using two-dimensional gel electrophoresis by isoelectric point from pH 4 to pH 7.5
`(from left to right) and by size (from top to bottom), and detected by radioautography. Panels A and
`B: Compared to a control incubation (panel A), at least five proteins showed increased labeling after
`stimulation with 10µM forskolin and 100 µM carbachol (panel B): p18, p23, p29, p37, and p83. Panels
`C and D: Compared to a control incubation (panel C), exposure to 100 µM quercetin for 5 min (panel
`D) resulted in the increased labeling of p18, p23 and p37. The labeling of p29 and p83 was not increased.
`Similar results were obtained in three additional experiments.
`
`

`

`Stimulation of Tfl4 cell secretion with flavonols
`
`1885
`
`Table 3. Effect of 100 µM quercetin on cAMP production in T84 cells
`
`Incubation time
`(min)
`
`cAMP production
`(% control)
`
`N (df)
`
`P (# 100)
`
`1
`5
`10
`15
`20
`
`94 ± 6
`152 ± 31
`143 ± 13
`116 ± 12
`126 ± 13
`
`6 (5)
`6 (5)
`8 (7)
`8 (7)
`6 (5)
`
`0.19
`0.07
`0.006
`0.11
`0.05
`
`Confluent TR4 cell monolayers were exposed to 100 µM quercetin for the indicated
`time periods, and the levels of cAMP in the corresponding cell homogenates were
`determined as outlined in Materials and Methods. In each paired experiment,
`cAMP production in cells exposed to quercetin is expressed as the percentage of
`the cAMP production in control cells not exposed to quercetin. Values are means
`± SEM. The mean cAMP production values in control cells for the time periods
`1, 5, 10, 15, and 20 min were respectively, 10.5 ± 0.8, 7.4 ± 0.9, 15.9 ± 1.3,
`12.1 ± 0.8, and 11.4 ± 1.2 pmol/filter. P values were calculated using one-tailed t-
`tests with the indicated df.
`
`transported
`to be
`that quercetin needs
`and
`transcellularly when added to the other side.
`We initially postulated that the reactive oxygen
`species produced by flavonol auto-oxidation and/or
`redox cycling may be the ultimate mediators of
`quercetin-induced secretion. However, because the
`secretory response to quercetin was not enhanced
`by Fe3+ and was not inhibited by desferroxamine B
`or catalase (alone or in combination with SOD), we
`were unable to substantiate a role for either
`superoxide, hydrogen peroxide, or the hydroxyl
`radical in the action of quercetin. The possibility
`that quercetin-induced secretion is independent of
`reactive oxygen species is further supported by the
`observation that kaempferol, which does not generate
`reactive oxygen species, stimulates secretion, while
`the converse is true of myricetin, a potent generator
`of reactive oxygen species [4]. When studies were
`performed to identify the intracellular mechanism
`responsible for quercetin-induced secretion, quer-
`cetin resembled other secretagogues known to
`stimulate T84 cells via cAMP: (a) quercetin-induced
`secretion was inhibited by barium chloride and
`bumetanide, (b) quercetin was synergistic with
`carbachol, but not with VIP, and (c) exposure of
`in
`the
`to quercetin resulted
`intact T84 cells
`phosphorylation of endogenous protein substrates
`for cAMP-dependent protein kinase. However,
`quercetin, at concentrations capable of stimulating
`cellular secretion, did not increase cAMP levels to
`the extent demonstrated by VIP. It is possible that,
`similar to the case of the adenosine analogue 5'-(N-
`ethyl)-carboxamido-adenosine [18], there may be a
`shift in the concentration-response curve when
`stimulation of cAMP is studied instead of secretion.
`However, we have not been able to explore this
`possibility because of the poor solubility and potential
`toxicity of high concentrations of quercetin [19]. It
`still remains possible that the modest increase in
`cAMP produced by quercetin was sufficient to
`stimulate the phosphorylation of the substrates for
`cAMP-dependent protein kinase responsible for
`controlling chloride secretion. That the interaction
`between quercetin and the cAMP pathway may be
`
`complex is further suggested by a possible inhibition
`of VIP-induced secretion by quercetin (e.g. less
`potent activation by quercetin of a pathway shared
`with VIP). Should this be the case, quercetin may
`prove to be useful as a probe for further studies of
`the intracellular mechanisms regulating intestinal
`secretion.
`Additional studies will be required to judge
`whether flavonols are physiologically important
`stimuli of intestinal secretion. Flavonols are found
`in the edible portions of many fruits and vegetables
`and the average intake is estimated to be 100 mg/
`day [20, 21], with vegetarians consuming significantly
`larger amounts. Quercetin is the most abundant
`dietary flavonol, and it therefore seems plausible
`that
`luminal concentrations of quercetin may
`reach 50-100 µM (15-30 mg/L) depending on the
`disposition of this flavonol after ingestion. Should
`these concentrations of quercetin be obtained in the
`intestinal lumen, the findings presented in this study
`indicate that this flavonol could stimulate a significant
`secretory response. In
`this regard,
`it seems
`noteworthy that dietary supplementation with fruits
`and vegetables has proved to be useful in the clinical
`management of chronic constipation [22]. Even
`though it has been assumed that the benefit of fruits
`and vegetables results from secretory as well as
`osmotic mechanisms, and from the contained fiber,
`scant information exists concerning the identity of
`the substances that may function as secretory stimuli.
`The present study raises the possibility that the
`secretory action of quercetin and other flavonols
`may account for the beneficial effects of fruits and
`vegetables for patients with constipation.
`
`Acknowledgements—This research was funded in part by
`the Department of Veterans Affairs, by NIH Grants DK
`40506 (T.D.N.), DK 40701 (J.A.C.) and DK 42486
`(T.W.G.), by NIEHS Grant IS 04752 (A.T.C.), and by a
`grant from the Cystic Fibrosis Foundation (J.A.C.). The
`authors are indebted to Margaret Wolfe, Jolanta Kole, and
`Wei Wang for their technical assistance, and to Dr. Helen
`Berschneider for her help in setting up the Ussing chambers.
`
`

`

`1886
`
`T. D. NGUYEN et al.
`
`REFERENCES
`
`1. Jacobs M and Rubery PH, Naturally occurring auxin
`transport regulators. Science 241: 346-349, 1988.
`2. Hodnick WF, Kung FS, Roettger WJ, Bohmont CW
`and Pardini RS, Inhibition of mitochondrial respiration
`and production of toxic oxygen radicals by flavonoids.
`A structure—activity study. Biochem Pharmacol 35:
`2345-2357, 1986.
`3. Hodnick WF, Kalyanaraman B, Pritsos CA and Pardini
`RS, The production of hydroxyl and semiquinone free
`radicals during the autoxidation of redox active
`flavonoids. In: Oxygen Radicals
`in Biology and
`Medicine (Eds. Simic MG, Taylor KA, Ward JF and
`VonSonntag C), pp. 149-153. Plenum Press. New
`York, 1988.
`4. Canada A, Gianella E, Nguyen TD and Mason RP.
`The production of reactive oxygen species by dietary
`flavonols. Free Radic Biol Med 9: 441-449, 1990.
`5. Bern MJ, Sturbaum CW, Karayalcin SS, Berschneider
`HM, Wachsman JT and Powell DW. Immune system
`control of rat and rabbit colonic electrolyte transport:
`Role of prostaglandins and enteric nervous system. J
`Clin Invest 83: 1810-1820, 1989.
`6. Karayalcin SS, Sturbaum CW, Dixon MU and Powell
`DW, Hydrogen peroxide is the reactive oxygen species
`(ROS) which stimulates colonic electrolyte secretion.
`Gastroenterology 94: A216(Abstract), 1988.
`7. Dharmsathaphorn K, McRoberts JA, Mandel KG,
`Tisdale LD and Masui H, A human colonic tumor cell
`line that maintains vectorial electrolyte transport. Am
`J Physiol 246: G204-G208, 1984.
`8. Weymer A, Huott P. Liu W, McRoberts JA and
`Dharmsathaphorn K, Chloride secretory mechanism
`induced by prostaglandin E, in a colonic epithelial cell
`line.

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket