throbber
Fundamentals of Class D Amplifiers
`maximintegrated.com/en/design/technical-documents/app-notes/3/3977.html
`
`APPLICATION NOTE 3977
`
`Abstract: A Class D amplifier's high efficiency makes it ideal for portable and compact high-
`power applications. Traditional Class D amplifiers require an external lowpass filter to
`extract the audio signal from the pulse-width-modulated (PWM) output waveform. Many
`modern Class D amplifiers, however, utilize advanced modulation techniques that, in various
`applications, both eliminate the need for external filtering and reduce electromagnetic
`interference (EMI). Eliminating external filters not only reduces board-space requirements,
`but can also significantly reduce the cost of many portable/compact systems.
`
`Introduction
`Most audio system design engineers are well aware of the
`power-efficiency advantages of Class D amplifiers over linear
`audio-amplifier classes such as Class A, B, and AB. In linear
`amplifiers such as Class AB, significant amounts of power are
`lost due to biasing elements and the linear operation of the output
`transistors. Because the transistors of a Class D amplifier are
`simply used as switches to steer current through the load,
`minimal power is lost due to the output stage. Any power losses
`associated with a Class D amplifier are primarily attributed to
`output transistor on-resistances, switching losses, and quiescent
`current overhead. Most power lost in an amplifier is dissipated as
`heat. Because heatsink requirements can be greatly reduced or
`eliminated in Class D amplifiers, they are ideal for compact high-
`power applications.
`
`In the past, the power-efficiency advantage of classical PWM-
`based Class D amplifiers has been overshadowed by external
`filter component cost, EMI/EMC compliance, and poor THD+N
`performance when compared to linear amplifiers. However, most
`current-generation Class D amplifiers utilize advanced
`modulation and feedback techniques to mitigate these issues.
`
`The Basics of Class D Amplifiers
`While there are a variety of modulator topologies used in modern
`Class D amplifiers, the most basic topology utilizes pulse-width
`modulation (PWM) with a triangle-wave (or sawtooth) oscillator.
`Figure 1 shows a simplified block diagram of a PWM-based, half-
`
`1/13
`
`IPR2022-00716
`Apple EX1009 Page 1
`
`

`

`bridge Class D amplifier. It consists of a pulse-width modulator,
`two output MOSFETs, and an external lowpass filter (L and C )
`F
`F
`to recover the amplified audio signal. As shown in the figure, the
`p-channel and n-channel MOSFETs operate as current-steering
`switches by alternately connecting the output node to V and
`DD
`ground. Because the output transistors switch the output to either
`V or ground, the resulting output of a Class D amplifier is a
`DD
`high-frequency square wave. The switching frequency (f
`) for
`SW
`most Class D amplifiers is typically between 250kHz to 1.5MHz.
`The output square wave is pulse-width modulated by the input
`audio signal. PWM is accomplished by comparing the input audio
`signal to an internally generated triangle-wave (or sawtooth)
`oscillator. This type of modulation is also often referred to as
`"natural sampling" where the triangle-wave oscillator acts as the
`sampling clock. The resulting duty cycle of the square wave is
`proportional to the level of the input signal. When no input signal
`is present, the duty cycle of the output waveform is equal to 50%.
`Figure 2 illustrates the resulting PWM output waveform due to
`the varying input-signal level.
`
`
`Figure 1. This simplified functional block diagram illustrates a
`basic half-bridge Class D amplifier.
`
` Read this
`Next
`
` High-
`Efficiency
`Class D
`Audio
`Amplifiers
`Extend
`Battery Life
`in Portable
`Applications
`
` Review
`Featured
`Products
`
` MAX98358
`
` MAX98308
`
` Visit the
`Product Page
`
` Class D
`Amplifiers
`
`2/13
`
`IPR2022-00716
`Apple EX1009 Page 2
`
`

`

`
`Figure 2. The output-signal pulse widths vary proportionally with
`the input-signal magnitude.
`
`In order to extract the amplified audio signal from this PWM
`waveform, the output of the Class D amplifier is fed to a lowpass
`filter. The LC lowpass filter shown in Figure 1 acts as a passive
`integrator (assuming the cutoff frequency of the filter is at least an
`order of magnitude lower than the switching frequency of the
`output stage) whose output is equal to the average value of the
`square wave. Additionally, the lowpass filter prevents high-
`frequency switching energy from being dissipated in the resistive
`load. Assume that the filtered output voltage (V
`) and current
`O_AVG
`(I
`) remain constant during a single switching period. This
`AVG
`assumption is fairly accurate because f
` is much greater than
`SW
`the highest input audio frequency. Therefore, the relationship
`between the duty cycle and resulting filtered output voltage can
`be derived using a simple time-domain analysis of the inductor
`voltage and current.
`
`The instantaneous current flowing through the inductor is:
`
`where V (t) is the
`L
`instantaneous voltage
`across the inductor using
`the sign convention shown
`in Figure 1.
`
`) flowing into the load is
`Because the average current (I
`AVG
`assumed constant over one switching period, the inductor current
`at the beginning of the switching period (T ) must be equal to
`SW
`the inductor current at the end of the switching period, as shown
`in Figure 3.
`
`In mathematical terms, this means that:
`
`3/13
`
`IPR2022-00716
`Apple EX1009 Page 3
`
`

`

`
`Figure 3. Filter inductor
`current and voltage
`waveforms are shown for a
`basic half-bridge Class
`D amplifier.
`
`Equation 2 shows that
`the integral of the
`inductor voltage over
`one switching period
`must be equal to 0.
`Using equation 2 and
`examining the V (t)
`L
`waveform shown in
`Figure 3, it is clear that
`the absolute values of
`the areas (A and
`ON
`A
`) must be equal to
`OFF
`each other in order for
`equation 2 to be true.
`With this information,
`we can now derive an
`expression for the
`filtered output voltage
`in terms of the duty
`ratio of the switching
`waveform:
`
`Substituting equations
`4 and 5 into equation 3
`gives the new equation:
`
`Finally, solving for V
`O
`gives:
`
`where D is the duty ratio of
`the output-switching
`waveform.
`
`Using Feedback to Improve Performance
`Many Class D amplifiers utilize negative feedback from the PWM
`output back to the input of the device. A closed-loop approach
`not only improves the linearity of the device, but also allows the
`device to have power-supply rejection. This contrasts with an
`open-loop amplifier, which inherently has minimal (if any) supply
`rejection. Because the output waveform is sensed and fed back
`to the input of the amplifier in a closed-loop topology, deviations
`
`4/13
`
`IPR2022-00716
`Apple EX1009 Page 4
`
`

`

`in the supply rail are detected at the output and corrected by the
`control loop. The advantages of a closed-loop design come at the
`price of possible stability issues, as is the case with all systems
`utilizing feedback. Therefore, the control loop must be carefully
`designed and compensated to ensure stability under all operating
`conditions.
`
`Typical Class D amplifiers operate with a noise-shaping type of
`feedback loop, which greatly reduces in-band noise due to the
`nonlinearities of the pulse-width modulator, output stage, and
`supply-voltage deviations. This topology is similar to the noise
`shaping used in sigma-delta modulators. To illustrate this noise-
`shaping function, Figure 4 shows a simplified block diagram of a
`1st-order noise shaper. The feedback network typically consists
`of a resistive-divider network but, for simplicity, the example
`shown in Figure 4 uses a feedback ratio of 1. Also, the transfer
`function for the integrator has been simplified to equal 1/s
`because the gain of an ideal integrator is inversely proportional to
`frequency. It is also assumed that the PWM block has a unity-
`gain and zero-phase-shift contribution to the control loop. Using
`basic control-block analysis, the following expression can be
`derived for the output:
`
`
`Figure 4. A control loop with 1st-order noise shaping for a Class
`D amplifier pushes most noise out of band.
`
`Equation 8 shows that the noise term, E (s), is multiplied by a
`n
`highpass filter function (noise-transfer function) while the input
`term, V (s), is multiplied by a lowpass filter function (signal-
`IN
`transfer function). The noise-transfer function's highpass filter
`response shapes the noise of the Class D amplifier. If the cutoff
`
`5/13
`
`IPR2022-00716
`Apple EX1009 Page 5
`
`

`

`frequency of the output filter is selected properly, most of the
`noise is pushed out of band (Figure 4). While the preceding
`example dealt with a 1st-order noise shaper, many modern Class
`D amplifiers utilize multi-order noise-shaping topologies to further
`optimize linearity and power-supply rejection.
`
`Class-D Topologies—Half Bridge vs. Full Bridge
`Many Class D amplifiers are also implemented using a full-bridge
`output stage. A full bridge uses two half-bridge stages to drive the
`load differentially. This type of load connection is often referred to
`as a bridge-tied load (BTL). As shown in Figure 5, the full-bridge
`configuration operates by alternating the conduction path through
`the load. This allows bidirectional current to flow through the load
`without the need of a negative supply or a DC-blocking capacitor.
`
`
`Figure 5. A traditional full-bridge Class D output stage uses two
`half-bridge stages to drive the load differentially.
`
`6/13
`
`IPR2022-00716
`Apple EX1009 Page 6
`
`

`

`Figure 6 illustrates the output waveforms of traditional BTL,
`PWM-based, Class D amplifiers. In Figure 6, the output
`waveforms are complements of each other, which produce a
`differential PWM signal across the load. As with the half-bridge
`topology, an external LC filter is needed at the output to extract
`the low-frequency audio signals and prevent high-frequency
`energy from being dissipated in the load.
`
`
`Figure 6. Traditional full-bridge Class D output waveforms
`complement each other, thus creating a differential PWM signal
`across the load.
`
`A full-bridge Class D amplifier shares the same advantages of a
`Class AB BTL amplifier, but adds high power efficiency. The first
`advantage of BTL amplifiers is that they do not require DC-
`blocking capacitors on the outputs when operating from a single
`supply. The same is not true for a half-bridge amplifier as its
`output swings between V and ground and idles at 50% duty
`DD
`cycle. This means that its output has a DC offset equal to V /2.
`DD
`With a full-bridge amplifier, this offset appears on each side of the
`load, which means that zero DC current flows at the output. The
`second advantage they share is that they can achieve twice the
`output signal swing when compared to a half-bridge amplifier with
`the same supply voltage because the load is driven differentially.
`This results in a theoretical 4x increase in maximum output power
`over a half-bridge amplifier operating from the same supply.
`
`A full-bridge Class D amplifier, however, requires twice as many
`MOSFET switches as a half-bridge topology. Some consider this
`to be a disadvantage, because more switches typically mean
`more conduction and switching losses. However, this generally is
`only true with high-output power amplifiers (> 10W) due to the
`higher output currents and supply voltages involved. For this
`reason, half-bridge amplifiers are typically used for high-power
`applications for their slight efficiency advantage. Most high-power
`full-bridge amplifiers exhibit power efficiencies in the range of
`
`7/13
`
`IPR2022-00716
`Apple EX1009 Page 7
`
`

`

`80% to 88% with 8Ω loads. However, half-bridge amplifiers like
`the MAX9742 achieve power efficiencies greater than 90% while
`delivering more than 14W per channel into 8Ω.
`
`Eliminating the Output Filter—Filterless Modulation
`One of the major drawbacks of traditional Class D amplifiers has
`been the need for an external LC filter. This need not only
`increases a solution's cost and board space requirements, but
`also introduces the possibility of additional distortion due to filter
`component nonlinearities. Fortunately, many modern Class D
`amplifiers utilize advanced "filterless" modulation schemes to
`eliminate, or at least minimize, external filter requirements.
`Figure 7 shows a simplified functional diagram of the MAX9700
`filterless modulator topology. Unlike the traditional PWM BTL
`amplifier, each half bridge has its own dedicated comparator,
`which allows each output to be controlled independently. The
`modulator is driven with a differential audio signal and a high-
`frequency sawtooth waveform. When both comparator outputs
`are low, each output of the Class D amplifier is high. At the same
`time, the output of the NOR gate goes high, but is delayed by the
`RC circuit formed by R and C . Once the delayed output of
`ON
`ON
`the NOR gate exceeds a specified threshold, switches SW1 and
`SW2 close. This causes OUT+ and OUT- to go low and remain
`as such until the next sampling period begins. This scheme
`causes both outputs to be on for a minimum amount of time
`(t
`), which is set by the values of R and C . As shown
`ON(MIN)
`ON
`ON
`in Figure 8, with zero input, the outputs are in phase with pulse
`widths equal to t
`. As the audio input signals increase or
`ON(MIN)
`decrease, one comparator trips before the other. This behavior,
`along with the minimum on-time circuitry, causes one output to
`vary its pulse width while the other output pulse width remains at
`t
` (Figure 8). This means that the average value of each
`ON(MIN)
`output contains a half-wave rectified version of the output audio
`signal. Taking the difference of the average values of the outputs
`yields the complete output audio waveform.
`
`8/13
`
`IPR2022-00716
`Apple EX1009 Page 8
`
`

`

`
`Figure 7. This simplified functional diagram shows the
`MAX9700's filterless Class D modulator topography.
`
`
`Figure 8. The input and output waveforms are shown for the
`MAX9700's filterless modulator topography.
`
`Because the MAX9700's outputs idle with in-phase signals, there
`is no differential voltage applied across the load, thereby
`minimizing quiescent power consumption without the need for an
`external filter. Rather than depend on an external LC filter to
`extract the audio signal from the output, Maxim's filterless Class
`D amplifiers rely on the inherent inductance of the speaker load
`
`9/13
`
`IPR2022-00716
`Apple EX1009 Page 9
`
`

`

`and the human ear to recover the audio signal. The speaker
`resistance (R ) and inductance (L ) form a 1st-order lowpass
`E
`E
`filter which has a cutoff frequency equal to:
`
`With most speakers, this
`1st-order rolloff is enough to
`recover the audio signal and
`prevent excessive amounts
`of high-frequency switching
`energy from being dissipated in the speaker resistance. Even if
`residual switching energy results in speaker movement, these
`frequencies are inaudible to the human ear and will not adversely
`affect the listening experience. When using filterless Class D
`amplifiers, the speaker load should remain inductive at the
`amplifier's switching frequency to achieve maximum output-
`power capabilities.
`
`Minimizing EMI with Spread-Spectrum Modulation
`One disadvantage of filterless operation is the possibility of
`radiated EMI from the speaker cables. Because the Class D
`amplifier output waveforms are high-frequency square waves
`with fast-moving transition edges, the output spectrum contains a
`large amount of spectral energy at the switching frequency and
`integer multiples of the switching frequency. Without an external
`output filter located within close proximity of the device, this high-
`frequency energy can be radiated by the speaker cables.
`Maxim's filterless Class D amplifiers help mitigate possible EMI
`problems through a modulation scheme known as spread-
`spectrum modulation.
`
`Spread-spectrum modulation is accomplished by dithering or
`randomizing the switching frequency of the Class D amplifier. The
`switching frequency is typically varied up to ±10% of the nominal
`switching frequency. While the period of the switching waveform
`is varied randomly cycle-to-cycle, the duty cycle is not affected,
`thereby preserving the audio content of the switching waveform.
`Figures 9a and 9b show the wideband output spectrum of the
`MAX9700 to illustrate the effects of spread-spectrum modulation.
`Rather than having the spectral energy concentrated at the
`switching frequency and its harmonics, spread-spectrum
`modulation effectively spreads out the spectral energy of the
`output signal. In other words, the total amount of energy present
`in the output spectrum remains the same, but the total energy is
`redistributed over a wider bandwidth. This reduces the high-
`frequency energy peaks at the outputs, therefore minimizing the
`chances of EMI being radiated from the speaker cables. While it
`is possible that some spectral noise may redistribute into the
`audio band with spread-spectrum modulation, this noise is
`suppressed by the noise-shaping function of the feedback loop.
`
`10/13
`
`IPR2022-00716
`Apple EX1009 Page 10
`
`

`

`
`Figure 9a. The wideband output spectrum is shown for the
`MAX9700 using
`a fixed switching
`frequency.
`
`
`Figure 9b.
`Spread-spectrum
`modulation
`redistributes the
`spectral energy
`of the MAX9700
`over a wider
`bandwidth.
`
`Many of Maxim's
`filterless Class D
`amplifiers also
`allow the
`switching
`frequency to be
`synchronized to
`an external clock
`signal. This
`allows the user to
`manually set the
`switching
`frequency of the
`amplifier to a
`less-sensitive
`frequency range.
`
`While spread-
`spectrum
`modulation
`significantly
`improves EMI
`performance of
`filterless Class D
`amplifiers, there is typically a practical limit on the length of the
`speaker cables that can be used before the device begins to fail
`FCC or CE radiated-emissions regulations. If a device fails
`radiated-emissions tests due to long speaker cables, an external
`output filter may be needed to provide additional attenuation of
`the high-frequency components of the output waveform. In many
`applications with moderate speaker cable lengths, ferrite
`bead/capacitor filters on the outputs will suffice. EMI performance
`is also very layout sensitive, so proper PCB-layout guidelines
`should be strictly followed to guarantee compliance with
`applicable FCC and CE regulations.
`
`11/13
`
`IPR2022-00716
`Apple EX1009 Page 11
`
`

`

`Conclusion
`Recent advancements in Class D modulation techniques have
`allowed Class D amplifiers to flourish in applications where linear
`amplifiers once dominated. Modern Class D amplifiers include all
`of the advantages of Class AB amplifiers (i.e., good linearity and
`minimal board-space requirements) with the added bonus of high
`power efficiency. Currently, there are a wide variety of Class D
`amplifiers available, thus making them suitable for numerous
`applications. These applications range from low-power portable
`applications (e.g., cell phones, notebooks) in which battery life,
`board-space requirements, and EMI compliance are of utmost
`importance, to high-power applications (e.g., automotive sound
`systems or flat-panel displays) where minimizing heatsinking
`requirements and heat generation is vital. Having a fundamental
`understanding of Class D amplifiers and their recent
`technological advances will aid designers in selecting the correct
`amplifier for their application and allow them to successfully
`weigh the advantages and disadvantages of specific features.
`
`
`
`Related Parts
`
`MAX9742 Single-/Dual-Supply, Stereo 16W, Class D Amplifier with Differential
`Inputs
`
`MAX9741 12W+12W, Low-EMI, Spread-Spectrum, Stereo, Class D Amplifier
`
`MAX9714 6W, Filterless, Spread-Spectrum Mono/Stereo Class D Amplifiers
`
`MAX9713 6W, Filterless, Spread-Spectrum Mono/Stereo Class D Amplifiers
`
`MAX9709 25W/50W, Filterless, Spread-Spectrum, Stereo/Mono, Class D
`Amplifier
`
`MAX9708 20W/40W, Filterless, Spread-Spectrum, Mono/Stereo, Class D
`Amplifier
`
`MAX9704 10W Stereo/15W Mono, Filterless, Spread-Spectrum, Class D
`Amplifiers
`
`MAX9703 10W Stereo/15W Mono, Filterless, Spread-Spectrum, Class D
`Amplifiers
`
`MAX9744 20W Stereo Class D Speaker Amplifier with Volume Control
`
`Free
`Sample
`
`Free
`Sample
`
`Free
`Sample
`
`Free
`Sample
`
`Free
`Sample
`
`Free
`Sample
`
`Free
`Sample
`
`Free
`Sample
`
`Free
`Sample
`
`12/13
`
`IPR2022-00716
`Apple EX1009 Page 12
`
`

`

`Related Parts
`
`MAX9715 2.8W, Low-EMI, Stereo, Filterless Class D Audio Amplifier
`
`MAX9701 1.3W, Filterless, Stereo Class D Audio Power Amplifier
`
`MAX9700 1.2W, Low-EMI, Filterless, Class D Audio Amplifier
`
`Free
`Sample
`
`Free
`Sample
`
`MAX9789 Windows Vista-Compliant, Stereo Class AB Speaker Amplifiers and
`DirectDrive Headphone Amplifiers
`
`MAX9776 2 x 1.5W, Stereo Class D Audio Subsystem with DirectDrive
`Headphone Amplifier
`
`Free
`Sample
`
`MAX9775 2 x 1.5W, Stereo Class D Audio Subsystem with DirectDrive
`Headphone Amplifier
`
`Next Steps
`
`EE-Mail
`
`Subscribe to EE-Mail and receive automatic notice of new documents in your
`areas of interest.
`
`Download Download, PDF Format
`
`© 31 Jan, 2007, Maxim Integrated Products, Inc.
`
`The content on this webpage is protected by copyright laws of the United States and of
`foreign countries. For requests to copy this content, contact us.
`
`APP 3977: 31 Jan, 2007
`
`APPLICATION NOTE 3977, AN3977, AN 3977, APP3977, Appnote3977, Appnote 3977
`
`
`
`
`13/13
`
`IPR2022-00716
`Apple EX1009 Page 13
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket