`______________
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`______________
`GOOGLE LLC,
`Petitioner,
`
`
`v.
`
`
`ARIGNA TECHNOLOGY LIMITED,
`Patent Owner.
`______________
`Case IPR2022-00685
`Patent No. 6,603,343
`______________
`JOINT MOTION TO TERMINATE INTER PARTES REVIEW
`
`
`
`
`
`Case IPR2022-00685
`Patent No. 6,603,343
`I. STATEMENT OF THE PRECISE RELIEF REQUESTED
`
`Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 317(a) and 37 C.F.R. § 42.74, Petitioner Google LLC
`
`and Patent Owner Arigna Technology Limited jointly move to terminate this inter
`
`partes review (IPR). The Board authorized the filing of this Joint Motion in an email
`
`dated August 19, 2022.
`
`II. STATEMENT OF REASONS FOR THE RELIEF REQUESTED
`
`The parties settled their underlying dispute and reached agreement to
`
`terminate this IPR in a written release agreement. A true copy of the release
`
`agreement is submitted as Exhibit 1019 with this motion, in accordance with
`
`35 U.S.C. § 317(a) and 37 C.F.R. § 42.74(b). Patent Owner Arigna Technology
`
`Limited has also executed a settlement agreement with third party RPX Corporation;
`
`however, the parties certify that the RPX agreement is not a settlement agreement or
`
`understanding entered into between Petitioner Google and Patent Owner Arigna as
`
`signatories nor is it a collateral agreement that is referenced in the release agreement
`
`submitted with this joint motion.
`
`The parties request that the release agreement be treated as business
`
`confidential information, to be kept separate from the file of the involved patent, and
`
`to be made available only to Federal Government agencies on written request, or to
`
`any person on a showing of good cause pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 317(b) and 37 C.F.R.
`
`§ 42.74(c).
`
`1
`
`
`
`Case IPR2022-00685
`Patent No. 6,603,343
`On August 16, 2022, the district court granted the parties’ joint motion to
`
`dismiss Arigna Tech. Ltd. v. Google LLC, C.A. No. 21-cv-01045 (W.D. Tex.) (the
`
`“Court Action”), which concerns U.S. Patent No. 6,603,343 (the “’343 Patent”). See
`
`ECF No. 72. Other than the Court Action, there are no litigation matters or
`
`proceedings between the parties involving the ’343 Patent.
`
`No other petitioners remain in this IPR. Thus, the parties respectfully submit
`
`that termination of the IPR is appropriate under 35 U.S.C. § 317 and 37 C.F.R.
`
`FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW,
`GARRETT & DUNNER L.L.P.
`By: /Daniel C. Tucker/
`
`
`Daniel C. Tucker (Reg. No. 62,781)
`Counsel for Petitioner
`
`
`HEIM, PAYNE & CHORUSH, LLP
`By: /Michael F. Heim/
`
`
`Michael F. Heim (Reg. No. 32,702)
`Counsel for Patent Owner
`
`
`
`
`
`
`§ 42.74(a).
`
`Dated: August 23, 2022
`
`Dated: August 23, 2022
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`
`
`Case IPR2022-00685
`Patent No. 6,603,343
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`The undersigned certifies that pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.6(e), true copies of
`
`this JOINT MOTION TO TERMINATE INTER PARTES REVIEW and Exhibit
`
`1019 are being served electronically on August 23, 2022 to the following lead and
`
`back-up counsel for Patent Owner at the following email addresses:
`
`Michael F. Heim
`mheim@hpcllp.com
`
`Christopher L. Limbacher
`climbacher@hpcllp.com
`
`R. Allan Bullwinkel
`abullwinkel@hpcllp.com
`
`By: /Lisa C. Hines/
`Lisa C. Hines
`Senior Litigation Legal Assistant
`FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW,
`GARRETT & DUNNER, LLP
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
