throbber
Downloaded from http://rupress.org/jgp/article-pdf/14/1/31/1234125/31.pdf by Reprints Desk on 02 February 2022
`
`A STUDY OF THE BACTERICIDAL ACTION OF ULTRA
`VIOLET LIGHT
`
`III. TuE ABSORPTION OF ULTRA VIOLET LIGHT BY BACTERIA
`
`BY FREDERICK L. GATES
`
`(From the Laboratories of The Rockefeller Institute for Medical Research, New Yark,
`and the Department of General Physiology, Harvard University, Cambridge)
`
`(Accepted for publication, June 10, 1930)
`
`In this study of the bactericidal action of ultra violet light the first
`paper (1) described the reaction of an 18 hour culture of Staphylococ(cid:173)
`cus aureus to monochromatic radiations. It was shown that the course
`of the reaction among large numbers of organisms was approximately
`the same at each wave length studied but that widely different incident
`energies were required at different wave lengths to produce these
`similar effects.
`The second paper (2) discussed the limits of the bactericidal zone,
`showed that the reaction had a low temperature coefficient, (approxi(cid:173)
`mately 1.1), gave evidence that within the variations of the methods
`used no significant errors were introduced by differences in the meas(cid:173)
`ured intensity of the source or in the hydrogen ion concentration of
`the medium, and indicated that plane polarization of the incident
`light had no effect upon the reaction.
`The present paper deals with the absorption of ultra violet light
`by intact bacteria. A final paper in this series will discuss structural
`and chemical units of bacterial protoplasm that may prove to be in(cid:173)
`volved in the reaction which results in the organism's death.
`
`Incident Energy Relationships at Various Wave Lengths
`Text-fig. 1, reproduced from the first paper of this series, shows that
`although the course of the bactericidal reaction was approximately
`the same at each wave length studied, these similar curves were found
`at very different incident energy levels at different points in the ultra
`violet 'Spectrum.
`
`31
`
`The Journal of General Physiology
`
`1
`
`EXHIBIT 1014
`
`

`

`Downloaded from http://rupress.org/jgp/article-pdf/14/1/31/1234125/31.pdf by Reprints Desk on 02 February 2022
`
`TEXT-FIG. 1. Incident energies required for bactericidal action at various wave lengths in the ultra violet spectrum
`
`to"'
`
`I
`
`IP '
`.J 14 5 6' 6
`
`,!
`
`f'RG.51'-Rmm.1
`
`,,.S6 41
`
`IQ'
`.J
`
`s
`~
`....
`t'"'
`~ H
`
`~
`~
`~ H
`
`V
`IV
`
`V
`J
`V
`
`/
`
`i/1,/
`
`N
`v,)
`
`~
`
`/.,,.
`
`~
`~
`
`I
`/~
`/
`
`~
`
`V
`
`j
`
`I
`I
`y
`
`/
`
`/.I
`/
`
`J
`
`I
`l/
`,
`
`J
`
`I
`
`~ .,... I,' 'ii' V
`
`I
`
`J
`
`/
`
`~
`
`,
`/
`
`:; ~ •
`.
`~ '<) 9Q ~ ~. -.
`
`..., °') "
`
`-
`
`-
`
`-
`
`-
`
`WAYl' L&l'fUTtr-1 NV ll7,I,[
`
`11\a t\, "' &\I
`
`I
`
`V
`I
`
`/
`
`I
`I V
`/, V I
`A
`,;/ I/ V I
`I/
`/; 1/ / I I
`
`'/; VJ
`/2~ ~v I
`~W/
`II
`
`/
`
`I.~
`
`~/
`
`2
`·/
`/
`
`-l.1'6 81
`
`/
`
`~ A V
`
`IP'
`J
`
`,!
`
`I
`V ~ ~ /
`,I
`I
`J v ,
`I) I I
`,I
`
`/
`
`I
`
`Q
`
`IQ
`
`2Q
`
`~
`..,.
`~ ,4(J
`~
`~ SQ
`\j
`~ 617
`
`JQ
`
`7()
`
`/()
`
`.9()
`
`/()0
`
`2
`
`

`

`Downloaded from http://rupress.org/jgp/article-pdf/14/1/31/1234125/31.pdf by Reprints Desk on 02 February 2022
`
`FREDERICK L. GATES
`
`33
`
`For example, if the incident energy required to kill half the exposed
`staphylococci be taken as an index, this energy requirement ranged
`from 3,150 ergs per mm. 2 at 302 m.µ, a wave length near the limit of
`bactericidal action, to 88 ergs at 266 m.µ. At other wave lengths,
`either above or below 266 m.µ, more incident energy was required.
`The destruction of 50 per cent of the microorganisms is chosen as the
`index because it is in the most accurately determined part of the curves
`where the mortality rate is least affected by variations in individual
`resistance.
`If the incident energies involved in 50 per cent destruction be plotted
`and joined by a continuous line the resulting curve appears as in Text(cid:173)
`fig. 2A. Parallel experiments on an 18 hour culture of Bacillus coli gave
`bactericidal energy curves similar in trend to those for S. aureus, and
`although complete statistics were not obtained on this bacterium the
`middle or exponential portion of the lethal reaction curves was deter(cid:173)
`mined by repeated observations at each wave length studied. Text(cid:173)
`fig. 3A shows the incident energies involved in the destruction of 50
`per cent of the exposed coli organisms.
`Its essential similarity to the
`corresponding aureus curve is apparent. Both curves would probably
`be somewhat modified in detail if more wave lengths were available for
`study.
`These characteristic curves (Text-figs. 2A and 3A) show clearly that
`less incident energy is required between 260 and 270 m.µ than in any
`other region of the bactericidal zone examined, and point toward a
`second minimum below 230 m.µ. The presence of a sharp peak in the
`energy requirement near 240 m.µ appears to be equally significant.
`Due apparently to the use of but a few wave lengths in the bactericidal
`zone, or to failure to measure spectral intensities, or to crude,methods
`of estimating bacterial destruction, the occurrence of a minimum at
`about 266 m.µ, and of the peak in the curve near 240 m.µ has been
`overlooked by most investigators. Usually they have been content
`with the conclusion that the shorter the wave length the more marked
`the bactericidal action (3).
`
`Bang (4) was apparently the first to observe regions of special bactericidal
`"effectiveness" or of corresponding bacterial susceptibility. Using a 30 ampere
`carbon arc through a spectrograph at 20 m.µ intervals, and estimating bactericidal
`efficiency mainly by relative exposure, he found two regions of maximal action, an
`
`3
`
`

`

`Downloaded from http://rupress.org/jgp/article-pdf/14/1/31/1234125/31.pdf by Reprints Desk on 02 February 2022
`
`34
`
`ULTRA VIOLET LIGHT.
`
`III
`
`"inner maximum" between 340 and 360 m.µ, and an "outer maximum" between
`240 and 260 m.µ. The lethal exposure varied from 1920 seconds at 330 to 300
`m.µ through 120 seconds at 300 to 280 m.µ to 4 seconds at 280 to 260 m.µ and 2
`seconds at 260 to 240 m.µ. Then longer exposures were required. The zone from
`240 to 220 m.µ needed 20 seconds, that between 220 and 210 m.µ, 30 seconds, and
`that between 210 and 200 m.µ required 120 seconds exposure to kill the organisms.
`
`I
`8
`6
`'o4
`-3
`2
`
`I
`8
`..,.
`6
`::e
`:::EN 4
`0
`ex: -3
`w
`Cl.. 2
`
`I
`8
`6
`- 4
`Q3
`
`2
`
`I
`I
`V
`
`/
`
`,...--.
`[\_
`
`I
`
`-f--.
`
`✓
`
`'
`
`" ' ~
`
`\
`
`\
`\
`
`I
`8
`6
`4"/
`32
`2
`
`I
`8
`6
`4~
`39
`2
`
`-~2 .23 .24 .25 .26 .27 .28 .29 .30 .31 .22 .23 .24 .25 .26 .27 .28 .29 .30 .3 J'
`IN J.L·
`A WAVE LENGTHS
`8
`TEXT-FIG. 2. A. Curve of incident energies involved in the destruction of 50
`per cent of S. aureus.
`B. Curve of the reciprocals of 2A.
`
`These longer exposures at short wave lengths were evidently due to the rapid
`decrease in intensity of the source employed. Mme. Henri (3) thought that both
`of Bang's maxima should be ascribed to variations in intensity of his carbon arc.
`Newcomer (5) exposed B. typhosus in quartz capillary tubes to narrow bands of
`the iron arc spectrum and counted surviving bacteria plated in agar, after exposures
`of 5 or 10 minutes. His figures, like Bang's, indicate a region of maximum effect
`
`4
`
`

`

`Downloaded from http://rupress.org/jgp/article-pdf/14/1/31/1234125/31.pdf by Reprints Desk on 02 February 2022
`
`FREDERICK L. GATES
`
`35
`
`between 254 and 268 m.µ, but his iron arc varied so much in spectral intensity
`that he did not find any significance in this peak of effectiveness. He concluded
`If there is
`that "equalintensities produce equal effects in the regions 2100-2800.
`a maximum in this region it is at most only slight and would be in the neighborhood
`of 2600."
`When Mashimo (6) varied the exposure of bacteria in a spectrograph from 15
`seconds to 80 minutes he found the first evidence of bactericidal action at 275 m.µ.
`
`'
`
`T
`
`.
`
`I
`I
`
`)
`
`I
`
`/1.---o. I',.
`
`r
`\
`\ I/
`.,
`
`,
`
`\
`
`I\
`
`I
`
`\
`\
`\
`
`I\ \
`
`l
`
`I
`8
`6
`
`I
`8
`6
`4~
`32
`2
`
`...
`
`I
`8
`6
`~"' 4
`~Q3
`a:
`~ 2
`
`V)
`c.::,
`I
`~ 8
`6
`- 4
`~3
`2
`
`I
`I
`.22 .23 .24 .25 .26 .27. 28 .29 .30 .31
`.2223 24 .25 .26 .27 .28 29 .30 .31
`WAVE LENGTHS IN JJ.
`A
`8
`TEXT-FIG. 3. A. Curve of incident energies involved in the destruction of 50
`per cent of B. coli.
`B. Curve of the reciprocals of 3A.
`
`With somewhat longer exposures the zone widened rapidly so that with a 3 minute
`exposure it extended from below 210 to above 280 m.µ. The marked action at
`275 m.µ was evidently due to a relatively high intensity of his source at this wave
`length, as an examination of his published photograph shows.
`Thus variations in spectral intensity, with no adequate methods of measurement
`or control, made it difficult to interpret the maxima found by Bang,Newcomer, and
`Mashimo, and these authors laid no stress upon them.
`
`5
`
`

`

`Downloaded from http://rupress.org/jgp/article-pdf/14/1/31/1234125/31.pdf by Reprints Desk on 02 February 2022
`
`36
`
`ULTRA VIOLET LIGHT.
`
`III
`
`In the present study the measurement of the monochromatic radiant
`energy in absolute units focuses attention upon the marked differences
`in the incident energies required at different wave lengths to kill S.
`aureus and B. coli. The shape of the energy curves for 50 per cent
`destruction immediately suggests that it is the specific absorption of the
`ultra violet radiations that gives the curves significance. This relation
`of incident energy to its specific absorption is made the more striking
`by plotting the reciprocals of these energies (Text-figs. 2B and 3B),
`by which graphs not unlike absorption curves, with maxima at 266 and
`beyond 230 m.µ are produced.
`As a first step in the further analysis of the bactericidal reaction it is
`obviously necessary to compare these curves with those for the absorp(cid:173)
`tion of ultra violet energy by the corresponding bacteria.
`
`The Absorption of Ultra Violet Light by Bacteria
`Apparently studies of the absorption spectra of bacteria have been
`confined hitherto to bacteria in suspension in a fluid medium (7,
`8). Suspensions in liquids are unsuitable for such examinations.
`Reflection and refraction from the bacterial bodies, with consequent
`scattering of light so that bacterial suspensions are opaque even in the
`visible region of the spectrum, and-the difficulty of estimating the num(cid:173)
`ber of organisms traversed, frustrate any attempt to obtain results of
`quantitative significance.
`But a loopful of bacteria may be taken en masse from the surface
`of an agar slant and pressed between quartz plates into a layer so thin
`that is is all but colorless in visible light, and so transparent that
`objects may be seen through it clearly and without distortion. The
`bacteria are in optical contact and form a homogeneous medium for
`the transmission of visible or ultra violet light. Such a film is com(cid:173)
`posed almost entirely of bacterial cells and the immediate products of
`their metabolism. Tests show that films of like thickness of the agar
`medium from which the bacteria were removed absorb no significant
`amounts of ultra violet light.
`Such a film of bacteria may be set up in one optical path of a quartz
`photometer, with similar plates of quartz and a drop of glycerol in the
`other path as a control, and the absorption coefficient of the organisms
`readily obtained in the manner commonly employed for chemical solu(cid:173)
`tions (9).
`
`6
`
`

`

`Downloaded from http://rupress.org/jgp/article-pdf/14/1/31/1234125/31.pdf by Reprints Desk on 02 February 2022
`
`FREDERICK L. GATES
`
`37
`
`Two beams of light from the same source, which have passed through the speci(cid:173)
`men under examination or its control in the photometer, are spread by a quartz
`spectrograph into parallel spectra in the plane of a photographic plate. The
`energy that traverses the control path is subject to quantitative variation by
`means of a sector shutter, and with the shutter set at predetermined openings
`a series of photographs is made. Then the point, or points, of equal blackening
`in each pair of spectral photographs indicate the wave lengths at which the test
`specimen and the sector shutter in the control path have reduced the original
`intensity of the light to the same degree.*
`
`In such experiments it is necessary to know accurately the depth of
`the medium traversed in order to calculate the coefficients of absorp(cid:173)
`tion for a layer of unit thickness. The standard or unit of thickness in
`these observations was chosen as 0.8 µ, the average diameter of S.
`aureus (10), so that the coefficients of absorption were obtained for a
`single layer of bacteria. The shape of B. coli and its wide variations
`in size precluded even so crude an estimate of a "single layer," so the
`coefficients for B. coli were :figured arbitrarily for a layer of the same
`thickness (0.8 µ) to permit a comparison with the results for S. aureus.
`The thickness of these films of bacteria between quartz plates was
`found to lie between 5 and 15 µ. Since the method of measurement
`employed (11) is easy, and is accurate (in microns) to the second or
`third decimal place it may be described in brief. The method is
`based on interferometry, namely, the measurement of the interference
`bands formed by the coincident spectra of white light reflected into a
`wavelength spectroscope from the two quartz surfaces enclosing the
`bacterial film.
`
`A point source of white light (carbon arc, concentrated tungsten filament, or
`even a flashlight bulb with the filament vertical), is set up at a measured angle of
`incidence (60°) to the film specimen, so that its light is reflected from the back
`surface of the first quartz plate and from the front surface of the second (the
`surfaces enclosing the film), into a wavelength spectroscope. The reflecting sur(cid:173)
`faces must be chosen near the bacterial film, but not to include it, since adequate
`reflection occurs only when air is the medium between the two plates. With a
`proper set-up, and films of suitable thickness a series of vertical interference bands
`will cut across the spectrum.
`
`* Measurements of absorption by such films made in 1923 with thermocouple
`and galvanometer (Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. and Med., 1923, 21, 61), were evidently
`not as accurate as those obtained by the present method and have been discarded.
`
`7
`
`

`

`Downloaded from http://rupress.org/jgp/article-pdf/14/1/31/1234125/31.pdf by Reprints Desk on 02 February 2022
`
`38
`
`ULTRA VIOLET LIGHT.
`
`III
`
`Then the distance (t) between the two plates (the thickness of the included
`film) is found by noting the wave lengths (>-1 and >-2) between which any convenient
`number (n) of interference bands is counted for substitution in the following
`equation:
`
`n X1 X2
`t= - - - - - -
`2 µ, cos r (X1 - X2)
`
`p, is the refractive index of the medium, and r is the angle of incidence and reflection.
`Since air is the medium p, = 1, and with rat 60° cos r = 0.5 so that the equation
`becomes
`
`For example, with the apparatus set up as described 5 interference bands are
`counted between X1 = 7241 Au. and X2 = 4638 Au. It is only necessary to multi(cid:173)
`ply these waves lengths together, divide by their difference, and multiply the result
`by 5 to determine that the distance between the plates in the area examined is
`6.45 p, or 0.00645 mm.
`
`In these experiments the films of bacteria, pressed out by hand,
`were not strictly plane parallel, but often thicker at one edge than
`at the opposite one, so four readings were taken at 90° intervals around
`the rim of each film and combined for an average thickness. The dif(cid:173)
`ferences in thickness in the small central area exposed in the photom(cid:173)
`eter were not so great as to make it desirable to obtain a mean expo(cid:173)
`nentially according to Lambert's law. For example:
`
`Film 1. B. coli. 90° readings at edge of film: 5.58, 6.17, 5.63, and 5.66 J.£.
`Average 5.76 µ,
`Film 2. S.aureus. 90°readings at edge of film: 9.21, 11.66, 11.24,and 10.53 P,.
`Average 10.66 µ,
`
`Given the average thickness of each film, the number of layers (n)
`of bacteria it contained was then available for the determination of the
`coefficients of absorption for a layer 0.8 µ thick. For this purpose the
`familiar equation of Lambert's law was used, to which Wood (11)
`says that no exception has ever been found that was not attributable to
`experimental error. Thus if a is the fraction of the original intensity
`(Io) transmitted by each unit layer, the intensity (/1) observed after
`passage through n layers is given by the equation:
`
`8
`
`

`

`Downloaded from http://rupress.org/jgp/article-pdf/14/1/31/1234125/31.pdf by Reprints Desk on 02 February 2022
`
`FREDERICK L. GATES
`
`39
`
`The relation of Ii to I. is chosen at appropriate intervals on the
`sector shutter of the quartz photometer, as described above, and this
`equation solved for a gives the coefficient of transmission at the
`wave length where the two spectra match. Then 1-a is the corres(cid:173)
`ponding coefficient of absorption for a single layer of bacteria 0.8 µ,
`thick.
`The mean absorption curve from five series of determinations with
`S. aureus is given in Text-fig. 4, and from five series with B. coli in
`Text-fig. 5. The curves are characteristic, and similar to those found
`for various biological tissues and fluids containing proteins or protein
`derivatives (12, 13, 14) on which their main features evidently depend.
`Differences in the curves for the two organisms are apparent, but in
`view of the experimental errors involved in such determinations they
`probably should not be stressed.
`The general similarity of these absorption curves to the reciprocals
`of the curves for bactericidal incident energy is obvious. All four
`curves rise rapidly from low levels beyond 300 m.µ to a maximum
`between 260 and 270 m.µ, then drop to a minimum near 240 m.µ and
`rise again toward a limit beyond the range of experimental observation.
`One is tempted to correct the incident energies involved in the bacteri(cid:173)
`cidal reaction by these absorption coefficients for the entire organisms
`in order to obtain an approximation of the total energies absorbed.
`Yet the two sets of curves show important points of difference also,
`especially in the location of the dip near 240 m.µ, and a closer consider(cid:173)
`ation of their relationship indicates that such a quantitative cor(cid:173)
`rection would be futile. The sum of the absorption coefficients of all
`the chemical entities in the bacterial cell cannot be expected exactly to
`correct the wide differences found in the bactericidal incident energies
`at different wave lengths unless every chemical group is involved
`in the bactericidal reaction in exact proportion to its contribution to
`total absorption. Such a hypothesis is hardly tenable. It seems
`more probable that it is the effect of ultra violet energy on a single
`vital and sensitive structural or chemical unit that results in subse(cid:173)
`quent failure in cell multiplication. Rahn (15) has recently figured
`from the curves of abiotic reactions among large numbers of single cell
`organisms tliat death of the cell probably involves only a single chemi(cid:173)
`cal entity. As Coblentz and Fulton (16) have suggested, it is to be
`
`9
`
`

`

`Downloaded from http://rupress.org/jgp/article-pdf/14/1/31/1234125/31.pdf by Reprints Desk on 02 February 2022
`
`40
`
`ULTRA VIOLET LIGHT.
`
`III
`
`presumed that only a small fraction of the total absorbed energy first
`affects such an essential structure, and so leads to the death of the cell.
`Neither the reciprocals of the energy curves, which are undoubtedly
`modified by the absorption of light by elements not involved in the
`
`\
`
`\
`' I
`' I
`
`' I .
`\
`\
`\.
`"V
`
`,, ............... I'...
`
`"'~
`\
`
`9 3
`
`36
`
`33
`
`30
`
`27
`._;
`z
`!j24
`er:
`w2
`l
`Q.
`
`~18
`I-
`~ 15
`0
`(/')
`co 12
`<C
`
`9
`
`6
`
`3
`
`\
`\
`\
`
`'['-.....
`
`0 .22 .23
`
`.24
`
`.29
`.28
`.2 7
`.26
`.25
`WAVE LENGTHS IN )l..
`
`.30
`
`.31
`
`.32
`
`TEXT-FIG. 4. The coefficients of absorption of ultra violet light by a layer of
`S. aureus 0.8 µ, thick.
`
`bactericidal reaction, nor the curves for total absorption give an ac(cid:173)
`curate picture of the absorption curve of this vital substance, whatever
`it may be. Yet their similarities and their differences are alike useful
`in the further search for such an essential and sensitive element in the
`cell's structure and economy.
`
`10
`
`

`

`Downloaded from http://rupress.org/jgp/article-pdf/14/1/31/1234125/31.pdf by Reprints Desk on 02 February 2022
`
`FREDERICK L. GATES
`
`41
`
`Thus it may be predicted that there are a number of chemical entities
`or aggregates in the living cell which have rather similar coefficients of
`ultra violet absorption, and that the sum of these similar absorption
`curves largely determines the shape of the curve for the entire cell.
`
`~
`\
`\
`\
`\
`
`39
`
`36
`
`33
`
`30
`
`~27
`Lu u
`o:::24
`Lu a..
`z~I
`0
`i= I 8
`a..
`0:::
`~15
`CJ
`<C
`
`12
`
`9
`
`6
`
`'v' ----:--....
`" '\
`\
`
`~---
`
`\
`\
`
`\
`\
`
`'
`
`" ' - 'o
`
`3
`0 .22 .23 24 25
`.29
`.26 27 28
`WAVE LENGTHS IN )1
`
`.30
`
`31 32
`
`TEXT-FIG. 5. The coefficients of absorption of ultra violet light by a layer of
`B. coli 0.8 µ thick.
`
`Among these substances will be found the one essential element first
`affected by ultra violet light in the bactericidal reaction, and its absorp(cid:173)
`tion curve will be similar to, though not identical with, the reciprocal
`of the lethal energy curve. Finally it seems improbable that this
`sensitive substance is uniformly distributed throughout the cell's pro-
`
`11
`
`

`

`Downloaded from http://rupress.org/jgp/article-pdf/14/1/31/1234125/31.pdf by Reprints Desk on 02 February 2022
`
`42
`
`ULTRA VIOLET LIGHT.
`
`III
`
`toplasm. An examination of the evidence for its concentration in the
`cell nucleus, and the further search for evidence of its chemical charac(cid:173)
`ter are reserved for the final paper of this series.
`
`SUMMARY
`The simple conclusion of former investigators that the shorter
`the wave length of ultra violet light the greater the bactericidal action
`is in error. A study with measured monochromatic energy reveals
`a characteristic curve of bactericidal effectiveness with a striking
`maximum between 260 and 270 m.µ. The reciprocal of this abiotic
`energy curve suggests its close relation to specific light absorption by
`some single essential substance in the cell.
`Methods are described for determining the absorption curve, or
`absorption coefficients, of intact bacteria. These curves for S.
`aureus and B. coli have important points of similarity and of differ(cid:173)
`ence with the reciprocals of the curves of bactericidal incident energy,
`and point the way in a further search for the specific substance, or
`substances, involved in the lethal reaction.
`
`REFERENCES
`1. Gates, FrederickL., J our. Gen. Physiol., 1929, 13,231.
`2. Gates, Frederick L., J our. Gen. Physiol., 1929, 13, 249.
`3. Henri, Mme. V., Compt. Rend. Soc. Biol., 1912, 73, 321.
`4. Bang, S., Mitt. aus Finsen's Med. Lichtinstitut., 1905, 9,164.
`5. Newcomer,H.S.,Jour.Exp.Med., 1917,26,841.
`6. Mashimo, T., Mem. Coll. Sci., Kyoto Imp. University, 1919, 4, 1.
`7. Bayne-Jones, S., and von derLingen, J. S., Bull. Johns Hopkins Hosp., 1923,
`34, 11.
`8. Browning, C.H., and Russ, S., Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond., Series B., 1917, 90, 33.
`9. Judd-Lewis, S., Jour. Chem. Soc., 1919, 115,312; Jour. Roy. Soc. Arts., 1921,
`69, 806.
`10. Hiss, P.H., and Zinsser, H., A Textbook of Bacteriology, D. Appleton and Co.,
`New York, 1928, 318.
`11. Wood, R. W., Physical Optics, Macmillan and Co., New York, 1921, 157.
`12. Henri, V., Etudes de Photochemie, Gauthier-Villars et Cie., Paris, 1919.
`13. Saidman, J., Compt. Rend. A cad. Sci., 1924, 179, 1448.
`14. Judd-Lewis, S., Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond., Series B., 1916, 89,327; 1920, 93, 178.
`15. Rahn, O.,Jour. Gen. Physiol., 1929, 13, 179; 1930, 13,395.
`16. Coblentz, W.W., and Fulton, H. R., Sci. Papers Bureau of Standards, 1924,
`No. 495, 19.
`
`12
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket