throbber
.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`I
`
`.
`
`.
`
`The Intravenous, intrape_ri~oneal, and
`Subcutaneous Routes of Insulin
`Delivery in; Diabetic Man
`
`.
`
`•
`
`DAVID S. SCHADE, R. PHILIP EATON, NEAL FRIEDMAN, AND WILLIAM SPENCER
`
`SUMMARY
`Successful implantation of an artificial pancreas re(cid:173)
`quires the infusion of insulin into an appropriate ana(cid:173)
`tomic site. Three sites bein:g actively investigated in(cid:173)
`clude (1) intravenous (i.v.), ,(2) intraperitoneal (i.p.),
`and (3) subcutaneous (s.c.). This s'tudy compared the
`rate, magnitude, and clurati.on of insulin absorption
`from these three absorption sites as assessed by the
`appearance of "free" in·sul!n into the plasma of 10 in(cid:173)
`sulin-dependent dia betic sbbjects. The biologic effec(cid:173)
`tiveness of insulin was as~essed by the suppression
`of plasma glucose concentration following a 750-calo(cid:173)
`rie meal.
`Our results suggest that i.v. delivered insulin pro-·
`vides the ITIOSt rapid increase in plasma free insulin
`concentration, followed by ·the i.p. and s.c .. routes, re(cid:173)
`spectively. In contrast, the ielevatioh of plasma free in(cid:173)
`sulin concentration was most prolonged with the.s.c.
`route, followed by i.p. and j.v. routes, respectively.
`Compared with the i.v. and: s.c. routes of insulin deliv(cid:173)
`ery, only 50% of the i.p. deiivered insulin appeared in
`the plasma. The O!'!Set of tbe biologic activity of the in(cid:173)
`sulin delivere_d by the three different routes during the
`4½-h observation period was most rapid for the i.v.
`and least rapid for the s.c. ·route. These results sug(cid:173)
`gest that all three routes m.ay be appropriate sites for
`delivery of insuliri frQm an artificial panc_reas.
`However, because of the d_ifference in absorption ki(cid:173)
`netics and the onset of biologic effectiveness of tt,e
`delivered insulin, different :quantities and timing of In(cid:173)
`sulin delivery may be nee~ed. DIABETES 28 :1069- 1072 ,
`December 1979.
`
`. .
`
`.
`
`.
`
`I
`
`.
`
`.
`
`T he successful devel:opment and implantation of an
`
`artificial insulin delivery system into diabetic man
`requires an appropriate site for the infusion of insu(cid:173)
`lin. The major anatomic sites being actively inves-
`
`From the University of New Mexico School of Medicine. Albuquerque. New
`Mexico. and Sand ia Laboratories, Livermore. Ca lifornia.
`Address reprint requests to David S. Schade, M.D., University of New Mexico
`SchOol of Medicine, Albuquerque. New Mexico 87131.
`Received for publicat ion 19 July 1979.
`
`ligated include (1) intravenous (i.v.), '-i (2) intraperitoneal
`(i. p. ),_3 and (3) subcutaneous (s:c.). •.s Although there are ad(cid:173)
`vantages -and disadvantages to each administration site. to
`date no studies are available that compare the rate and de•
`gree of insulin absorption as measured by the appearance
`of insulin into the peripheral circulation.
`This study examined the increase in plasma free insulin
`concentration in diabetic subjects receiving a prepro~
`grammed infusion of exogenous insulin. Re.gular insulin (40
`U/ml) was infused inio either the i.v. , i.p., or s.c. site by
`means of a portable. rotary solenoid microliter-infusion
`pump. An assessment of the rapidity, magnitude, and dura(cid:173)
`tion of insul in absorption from these three sites was made
`using a randomized paired-study protocol in 10 diabetic
`men lacking endogenous insu lin secretion (no C-peptide
`secretion). In addition, the change in plasma glucose con(cid:173)
`centration following ingestion of identical meals was also
`examined as a measure of ihe onset of biologic activity of
`the insulin del ivered during the 4½-h observation period.
`
`METHODS
`.
`Subject population. Ten healthy, normal weight, male, in(cid:173)
`sulin-dependent diabetic subjects participated
`in
`ttie
`13½-h studies. Ages ranged from 22 to 39 yr and all sub(cid:173)
`jects were receiving eithe~ one or two injections per day of
`isophane insulin with or without the add ition of regular irisu(cid:173)
`lin. On the evening before study. the subjects were admitted
`to the Clinical Research Center of the University of New
`Mexico School of Medicine. No subject received insulifl
`between 7:30 p.m. and the start of the studies at 7:30 a.m.
`the next day. Before initiating these studies, informed
`written consent was obtained from each volunteer, and all
`studies were approved by the University of New Mexico

`Human Research Review Committee.
`Protocol. On the day of study, each subject received three
`identical meals, which corresponded in time to breakfast,
`lunch, and supper at 7:30 a.m.: noon, and 4:30 p.m. Each
`mea l consisted of ham, fruit, bread, and milk comprising
`750 calories (40% carbohyqrate, 40% fat, and 20% protein).
`
`DIABETES. VOL 28, DECEMBER 1979
`
`1069
`
`FRESENIUS EXHIBIT 1052
`Page 1 of 4
`
`

`

`INSULIN DELI VE RY RO UTES
`
`Between meals, free access to water was allowed but no
`food was ingested.
`The 13½-h protocol was divided into three equar time
`periods of 4 ½ h each, during which each subject received
`one i.v .. one i.p., and one s.c. insulin infusion study in ran(cid:173)
`domized sequence. The protocol used in all studies em(cid:173)
`ployed an initial 30-min high dose insulin infusion of 5 U of
`regular insulin beginning simultaneously with the start of the
`meal. Following the 30-min high dose insulin infusion, the
`infusion pump reverted to the low dose insulin infusion rate
`of 2 U/h for three additional hours. Al the end of _the 31/? h, the
`insu lin delivery catheter was removed. The subsequent 60-
`min "no insulin" period permitted an assessment of contin(cid:173)
`ued insulin absorption from the infusion site.
`All insulin protocols used. a mini, peristaltic rotary sole(cid:173)
`noid pump to deliver the insulin.6 This pump was portable
`(6.0 x 7.5 x 10 cm) and battery operated. The pump was
`driven in a pulsati le fashion by a rotary solenoid, each pulse
`rotating the pump head by 10 degrees and delivering a vol(cid:173)
`ume of 2 µI/pulse. Reproducibility of ihe pump was ± 5% for
`a delivery volume of 72 µI. In all infusion studies, the insulin
`was stored in a 50-ml plastic reseNoir connected by a 10-
`cm plastic tube to the rotary solenoid pump. Before starting
`the individual infusion studies, 1 ml of the U40 insulin in the
`reservoir was pumped through the p iastic tubing to saturate
`insulin absorption sites.
`Infusion technique. insulin in all three studies was deliv(cid:173)
`ered through a 22-gauge plastic lntracath (Deseret Pharma(cid:173)
`ceutical Company, Sandy, Utah), 20 cm in length, attached
`to the insulin pump via a 40-cm connecting .tube. In the i.v.
`delivery of insulin study, the 19-gauge trocar was inserted
`into an antecubital vein, permitting placement of the plastic
`catheter approximately 5 cm into the vein.
`In the i.p. insulin infusion studies, the 22-gauge lntracath
`was inserted 3 cm below the umbilicus into the i.p .. space
`through a locally anesthetized area. The flexible plastic ln(cid:173)
`tracath catheter was "threaded" through a 19-gauge trocar
`into the peritoneal space to a depth of approximately 5 cm.
`This catheter was not rigid enough to pierce either a b lood
`vessel or the wall of the intestine. Once the catheter was
`threaded through the trocar, the trocar was removed and
`taped to the abdominal skin. Sterile technique was used
`throughout the procedure. Following the 3½-h peritoneal in(cid:173)
`fusion, the catheter was removed and cultured. In the 10
`subjects undergoing this procedure, no complications or in(cid:173)
`fections were encountered. Our experience indicates that
`this procedure is both safe and pain less and agrees with
`published reports in the literature on the safety of this tech(cid:173)
`nique.'
`In the s.c. insulin infusion study, an identical lntracath
`was p laced subcutaneously approximately 4 cm above the
`umbil icus. The trocar was inserted approximately 5 cm into
`the s.c. tissue and ihen withdrawn, leaving the plastic cath(cid:173)
`eter approximatel_y 4 cm within the s.c. space.
`Assay methodology. Plasma glucose concentration was
`measured by glucose oxidase and plasma free insulin by
`double antibody radioimmunoassay foll owing precipitation
`with 25% polyethylene glycol lo remove endogenous insulin
`antibodies as previously described. 3 C-peptide was as(cid:173)
`sayed with a kit from Calbiochem (Van Nuys, California).8
`Statistical .assess.ment. The changes in plasma free ,insu(cid:173)
`lin concentration in these diabetk subjects w.ere assessed
`
`125
`
`100
`
`75
`
`50
`
`25
`
`0
`20
`
`15
`
`10
`
`..,.
`e
`'3 :,
`-= a
`-=
`! ..
`
`ci.
`
`<:: g
`
`E
`
`:i:
`0
`~
`a,
`~ 5
`"' .,
`a
`
`0
`
`, - - - - low - - - - - - ott -
`
`- - intravenous delivery
`-
`-
`intraperltoneal
`..
`- ---·· subcutaneous
`
`l
`
`0 r MEAL
`
`2
`HOURS
`
`3
`
`4
`
`Figure 1. The changes In plasma free Insulin concentration (top) a1,1d
`glucose concentration (bottom) during programmed delivery of 11 U of
`regular Insulin ~Y three different routes in diabetic man. The Infusion
`of Insulin (U40-regular) was begun at a high dose (1 0 U/h) at time 0
`and continued for 30 min, when the Infusion pump automatically
`reverted to the low dose (2 U/h) for an additional 3 h. Simultaneously
`with the start of 'the high dose Insulin Infusion, each cif the 10 diabetic
`subjects bega_n to eat a 750-calorie meal (arrow). At the end of the
`inhi sloh period (3½ h) the insulin infusion was stopped for 60 min
`(off). Each of the 10 diabetic subjects participated in an intravenous,
`intraperitoneal, and subcutaneous insulin infu sion study iri a
`randomized sequence. The mean :t SEM of these 10 subjects is
`shown in the figure.
`
`by frequent venous blood sampling from the arm contra(cid:173)
`lateral to that which received the i.v. insulin. Four-milliliter
`blood samples were withdrawn via a #19 scalp vein needle
`every 15 or 30 min throughout the study. as shown in Figure
`1. Patency of this scalp vein needle was maintained by con(cid:173)
`tinuous infusion of isotonic saline (1 ml/min).
`The mean ::!: SE for insulin and glucose for all studies are
`plotted in Figure 1. To quantitate the amount of insulin ap(cid:173)
`pearing in the peripheral circulation during the 4 ½-h
`period, the increase in insulin concentration above the ini(cid:173)
`ti~I starting concentration at time O was assessed by inte(cid:173)
`gration. To estimate the rapidity of onset of biologic effec(cid:173)
`tiveness of the administered insulin, the increase of plasma
`glucose concentration over baseline levels was compared
`with Student's t test for paired data.
`
`RESULTS
`Mean plasma free insulin concentration (Figure 1 ). In the
`i.v. insulin infusion study, mean plasma free insulin concen(cid:173)
`tration rose to a maximum of 119 ± 13 µ U/ml by 15 min
`post initiation of infusion and then decreased rapidly fol(cid:173)
`lowing termination of the high dose infusion to an approxi(cid:173)
`matE! background level of 30 µU/ml. When the insulin infusion
`
`1070
`
`DIABETES, VOL: 2!), DEC.EMBER 1979
`
`FRESENIUS EXHIBIT 1052
`Page 2 of 4
`
`

`

`0/\VID S SCHADE /\NO ASSOCIATES
`
`was stopped at 3½ h, the p lasma tree insulin concentration
`decreased further to approximately 18 µU/ml, 5 µU/ml
`below the initial starting basal tree insulin concentration of
`22 ± 3 µ,U/ml (P < 0.0 1 ).
`In the i.p. insulin infusion study, mean plasma free insulin
`concentration rose to a maximal concentration of 37 ± 6
`µ,U/ml by 45 min postinitiation of the high dose insulin infu(cid:173)
`sion followed by a slow decline over a period of approxi(cid:173)
`mately 1 h, attaining a level of 26 µU/ml during the low dose
`insulin infusion. Following termination of the infusion. a fur(cid:173)
`ther decline in p lasma free insulin concentration was ob(cid:173)
`served to a level of 18 ± 1 µU/ml, not different from the ini(cid:173)
`tial starting basal free insulin concentration of 19 ± 3 µU/ml
`(P > 0.05).
`In the s.c. insulin infu sion study, mean plasma free insul in
`concentration rose to 40 ± 4 µU/ml by 2 h postinitiation of
`high dose infusion followed by a slow decline in plasma free
`insu lin concentration. After the infusion of insulin had
`ceased for 60 min, the plasma free insulin concentration re(cid:173)
`mained elevated at 29 ± 2 µU/ml (P < 0.001 ).
`In each study, plasma free insulin concentration demon(cid:173)
`strated a rise and subsequent fall. However, the timing and
`magnitude of this change depended on the route of insulin
`delivery. At 30 min following the initiation of insulin infusion,
`plasma free insulin concentration in the i. p. study (34 ± 4
`µU/ml) was significantly greater than in the s.c. one (21 ± 2
`µU/ml) and significantly less than in the i.p. study (117 ± 10
`µ U/ml) (P < 0.05) (Figure 1 ). By 2 h, however, the plasma
`free insulin concentration in the s.c. study (41 ± 3 µU/ml)
`had exceeded the concentration in both the i.p. (26 ± 3
`µU/ml) and i.v. studies (29 ± 2 µU/ml) (P < 0.05). This late
`elevation in plasma free insulin concentration persisted
`throughout the remainder of the study such that at 4 ½ h, the
`insulin concentration in the s.c. study (29 ± 2 µU/ml) was
`sign ificantly greater than in the i. p. (18 ± 1 µU/ml) and the
`i. v. ones ( 16 ± 2 µU/ml) (P < 0.01 ).
`Integrated insulin concentraiion (Table 1 ). Although the
`same quantity of exogenous insulin was infused into all sub(cid:173)
`jects in each study (11 U), the quantity of insulin appearing
`in the plasma significantly differed, depending on the route
`of administration. During the 4\/2-h i.v.
`infusion study,
`
`TABLE 1
`Integrated area of free insulin above basal concentration
`(µU/ml · h/100)
`
`Subject
`
`Intravenous
`
`lntraperitoneal
`
`Subcutaneous
`
`1. N.V.
`2 E.G.
`3. J.A.
`4. M.P.
`5. J.G.
`6. J.0 .
`7. 0.8.
`8. J.S
`9. L.P.
`10. 0.8.
`Mean
`Sem
`
`4,825
`12,837
`5,437
`13,975
`4,437
`8, 175
`9,262
`8,850
`11,637
`8,000
`+ 8,743
`-
`1,046
`
`2,275
`5,262
`1,040
`5,625
`3,537
`2, 11 2
`3,050
`4,862
`4,775
`3,850
`+ 3,638
`-
`480
`
`8,187
`8,300
`9,362
`9,162
`3,262
`3,525
`5,650
`8,637
`9,150
`8.600
`+ 7,383
`-
`743
`
`.-- P < 0.00 1 - - P < 0.001 --.
`
`- - - - - P > 0.05 - -- --+
`
`8743 ± 1046 µU/ml · h/100 of insulin appeared in the
`plasma. This quantity was twice that of insulin appearing in
`the plasma when delivered via the i.p. route (3636 ± 480
`µU/ml · h/100) (P < 0.001 ). When the 11 U of insulin was
`delivered via the s.c. route, 7383 ± 743 µU/ml · h/100 ap(cid:173)
`peared in the plasma, significantly greater than that during
`the i.p. route (P < 0.00 1} but not different from that quantity
`appearing during the i.v. infusion of insulin (P > 0.05).
`Plasma glucose concentration (Figure 1). Plasma glucose
`concentration rose in all studies following ingestion of the
`750-calorie meal. However, the rise was most rapid during
`the s.c. administration of insulin and least rapid during i. v.
`administration. Statistically, this difference became signifi(cid:173)
`cant at 45 min when plasma glucose concentration had
`risen by 4.1 ± 1.2 mrnol/L in the s.c. study, 1.6 ± 0. 7 mmol/L
`in the i.p. study, and declined by -0.9 ± 0.8 mmol/L in the
`i.v. study (P < 0.05 for all comparisons). This statistical dif(cid:173)
`ference remained throughout the initial 75-min observation
`period. This rate of rise corresponded inversely to the rate of
`rise in plasma free insulin concentration in the three differ(cid:173)
`ent delivery route studies (Figure 1, top).
`Plasma C-peptlde concentration. Plasma C-peptide con(cid:173)
`centration was assayed in all plasma samples. In no subject
`was C-peptide detectable in the plasma at any observation
`point during these studies.
`
`DISCUSSION
`This study compared the rapidity, duration, and magnitude
`of insulin absorption during insulin infusion via the i.v., i.p.,
`and s.c. delivery routes. Our results demonstrate that i.v. in(cid:173)
`su lin attains maximal plasma concentration by 15 min, fol(cid:173)
`lowed by the i.p. (45 min) and the s.c. routes (120 min), re(cid:173)
`spectively. With
`respect
`to
`the duration of
`insulin
`absorption, absorption from the s.c. site was most pro(cid:173)
`longed in contrast to the very rapid decline in p lasma insu(cid:173)
`lin concentration following termination of i.v. insulin deliv(cid:173)
`ery. The magnitude of the integrated rise in plasma insulin
`was comparable in both the i.v. and s.c. infusion routes, but
`was reduced by 50% with peritoneal delivery of insulin. In
`spite of this "Joss," i.p. delivery of insulin was as effective, if
`not more effective, than s.c. delivery in suppressing the
`meal-related hyperglycemia.
`This is the first study demonstrating that i.p. insulin deliv(cid:173)
`ery may control postprandial hyperglycemia in healthy dia(cid:173)
`betic men. lntraperitoneal insulin delivery has several char(cid:173)
`acteristics that make it an attractive alternative to i.v. and
`s.c. insulin delivery. First, the absorption of insulin is rela(cid:173)
`tively rapid such that rapid control of hyperglycemia may be
`achieved. Second, the peritoneal space is extravascular
`such that catheter thrombosis is minimized. 9 Third, the peri(cid:173)
`toneal space is a potentially large anatomic space into
`which an artificial pancreas could be implanted without dis(cid:173)
`figurement of the recipient.
`In these studies, only short-term insulin absorption kinet(cid:173)
`ics were examined, which may not necessarily reflect kinet(cid:173)
`ics of long-term delivery. Furthermore, because our protocol
`was not designed to optimize glucose control by the three
`routes of insu lin delivery, additional studies will be required
`to determine the most effective route in controlling plasma
`glucose concentration. However, since a relationship exists
`between the timing of the insulin increase in the plasma and
`the rise of plasma glucose concentration, 10 our results sug-
`
`DIABETES, VOL 28, . DECEMBER 1979
`
`1071
`
`FRESENIUS EXHIBIT 1052
`Page 3 of 4
`
`

`

`INSULIN DE LI VERY ROUTES
`
`gest that the infusion of s.c. insulin be begun before the start
`of the meal, as has been employed. 4
`5 Furthermore, since
`•
`both our resu lts and the results of others" demonstrate a
`prolonged absorption of insulin at the s.c. site following ter(cid:173)
`mination of the insul in infusion, a reduced rate of delivery
`between meals should be evaluated when using this route.
`Our results also suggest that improved glucose control
`might be achieved during the i.p. route if the insulin is ad(cid:173)
`ministered at a greater concentration for a shorter period of
`time following the initiation of the meal. Whatever the route
`of insulin delivery used by an artificial pancreas, knowledge
`of the kinetics of insulin absorption and the onset of biologic
`activity should result in improved control of meal-induced
`hyperglycemia.
`
`ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
`This investigation was supported by grants from the Clinical
`Research Center Program, ORR, NIH grant RR-00997-02,
`the Kroc Foundation, NIAMD-19998-01 , NICHD grant IP50-
`HD11327-01, and the Department of Energy. David S.
`Schade is the recipient of Research Career Development
`Award 1 KZ4AM00260-02.
`The technical assistance of Enid Pinero and Jerry Towle
`is appreciated. The mechanical and electrical engineering
`expertise of Raymond Bair, Gary Carlson, and Jerry Love in
`the design, fabrication, and testing of the ins_ulin mini infu-
`
`sion pump used in these studies is gratefully acknowl(cid:173)
`edged.
`
`REFERENCES
`' Albisser, A M .. Botz. C. K., and Leibel, 8 . S.: Blood g lucose regula(cid:173)
`tion using an open loop insulin delivery system in pancreatectomized dogs
`given glucose infusions. Diabetologia 16:129- 33, 1979.
`' lrsigler, K .. and Kritz, H.: Long-term continuous intravenous insulin
`therapy with a portable insulin dosage-regulating apparatus. Diabetes

`28:196- 203. 1979.
`3 Schade. D. S., Eaton, R. P., Spencer, W., et al.: The peritoneal ab(cid:173)
`sorption of insulin in diabetic man: a potential site for a mechanical insulin
`delivery system. Metabolism 28: 195- 97. 1979.
`• Pickup, J. C., Keen, H .. Parsons, J. A, et al.: Continuous subcutane(cid:173)
`ous insulin infusion: an approach to achieving normoglycaemia. Br. Med. J.
`I 204 - 07. 1978.
`• Tambcrlane, W. V. , Sherwin, R. S., Genet, M., et al.: Reduction to nor(cid:173)
`mal of plasma glucose in juvenile d iabetes by subcutaneous administration
`of insulin with a portable infusion pump. N. Engl. J. Med. 300:573- 78. 1979.
`• Carlson, G. A., Shafer, 8. D., Urenda, R. S., et al.: A new low-power
`high-reliability infusion pump. Presented at the 7th Annual New England
`(Northeast) Bioengineering Conference, March 22-23. t 979.
`' Berger, W. J ., Jr.: Evaluation of " intracath" method of abdomi nal
`paracentesis. Am. Surg. 35:23- 26, 1969.
`• Kuzuya, H., Blix, P. M., Horwitz, D. L., et al.: Determination of free and
`total insulin and C-peptide in insulin-treated diabetics. Diabetes 26:22-29,
`1977.
`
`• Yoffey, J. M., and Courtice, F. C.: Lymphatics, Lymph and the Lym(cid:173)
`phOmyeloid Complex. New York, Academic Press, 1970, p. 295.
`•• Eaton, R. P., Spencer, W .. Schade, D. S., et al.: Diabetic glucose
`control: matching plasma insulin concentration to dietary and stress hyper(cid:173)
`glycemia. Diabetes Care I :40-44, 1978.
`" Slama, G .. Buu, K. N. P .. Tchobroutsky. G .. et al.: Plasma insulin and
`C-peptide levels during continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion. Diabetes
`Care 2:251 - 55. 1979.
`
`1072
`
`DIABETES, VOL. 28, DECEMBER 1979
`
`FRESENIUS EXHIBIT 1052
`Page 4 of 4
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket