throbber
SiGesedD
`
`SIMULATION
`
`APPLE ET AL. EXHIBIT 1010
`
`R. Jacob Baker Harry W.Li David E. Boyce
`
`Bh
`=F
`ote
`ae
`
`IEEEPress Series on Microelectronic Systems
`Stuart K. Tewksbury, Series Editor
`
`1
`
`APPLE ET AL. EXHIBIT 1010
`
`

`

`Process Information for Hand-Calculations
`
`GNAONNOS
`
`COSTA POS
`
`App. C
`App. C
`App. A
`App. A
`5 ee ee
`.
`sv
`
`VDD (VSS=0) V SV
`
`
`Vv.
`2
`[2eC 50ee
`
`0
`17
`
`iV(006sSm|OG6TeeLSSympSd
`TVae
`
`oy|tm|tm|ms
`oF
`
`~L,
`
`0.14 ym
`
`30um
`
`0:16 um
`
`2
`
`2
`
`Multipliers
`
`kilo
`
`Nor (MEG)
`k
`
`2
`
`

`

`Physical Constants
`
`Name|Symbot|Value/Units|
`es
`[Vacuumdielectric
`fy
`8.85 aF/um
`constant
`
`Silicon dielectric
`constant
`
`SiO, dielectric
`constant
`
`Ey
`
`nx
`
`En;
`
`11.7e,
`
`3.97,
`
`l6e,
`
`
`
`ISIN,dielectric
`constant
`Electronic charge|ql 16x10"C
`
`
`[femperamre==|COCTCLCK
`|Thermal voltage
`Vi,
`kT/g
`
`
`=26mvV @ 300K
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Equations
`
`a=)
`
`NMOSequationsin terms of BSIM1 parameters
`
`for PMOSuse V,,, Vig, Vas, and Vinp
`
`[PHI+ Veg —K2-(PHI+Vsp)
`VEB + PHI+K1-
`Ch—ieeTOxSSCS~—~SSCSCSY
`Cox
`KP
`
`ap
`
`2
`Vps
`
`, (triode)
`
`
`
`Lit)
`
`
`
`dec
`VosS Ves— Venn 6ve~Vruw)Vps — 5 ) (for Long L)
`Z,, (saturation)
`B(V,
`Vin)?
`_
`os — Vraw) (1+Vos—Vossar)] (for Long L)
`Vos 2 Ves— Vow
`{2
`B(Vas—Vraw) = J2Blp or Ip /(Vr - NO)
`=
`
`3
`
`

`

`TEEFE Press
`445 Hoes Lane, P.O. Box 1331
`Piscataway, NJ 08855-1331
`
`Editorial Board
`John B. Anderson, Editor in Chief
`
`P. M. Anderson
`M. Eden
`M. E. El-Hawary
`5. Furui
`A. H. Haddad
`
`R. Herrick
`G. F. Hoffnagle
`R, F. Hoyt
`5. Kartalopoulos
`P. Laplante
`
`R. S. Muller
`W. D. Reeve
`D.J. Wells
`
`Kenneth Moore, Director ofIEEE Press
`John Griffin, Senior Editor
`Linda Matarazzo, Assistant Editor
`
`IEEE Circuits & Systems Society, Sponsor
`CAS-S Liaison to TEEE Press, Phillip Allen-
`IEEE Solid-State Circuits Society, Sponsor
`SSC-S Liaison to IEEE Press, Stuart K. Tewksbury
`
`Technical Reviewers
`
`Jeff Bruce, Micron Technology, Inc.
`Alan Buchholz, Comlinear Corporation
`{an Galton, University of California, Irvine
`Bruce Johnson, University afNevada, Reno
`Joseph Karniewicz, Micron Technology, Inc.
`Brent Keeth, Micron Technology, Inc.
`William Kuhn, Kansas State University
`Wen Li, Micron Technology, Inc.
`Brian P. Lum Shue Chan, Crystal Semiconductor Corporation
`Alan Mantooth, Analogy, Inc.
`Adrian Ong, Stanford University
`Terry Sculley, Crystal Semiconductor Corporation
`Don Thelen, Analog Interfaces
`Axel Thomsen, Crystal Semiconductor Corporation
`Kwang Yoon, Inha University, Korea
`
`4
`
`

`

`CMOS
`Circuit Design, Layout, and Simulation
`
`R. Jacob Baker, Harry W. Li and David E. Boyce
`Department ofElectrical Engineering
`Microelectronics Research Center
`The University of Idaho
`
`IEEEPress Series on Microelectronic Systems
`Stuart K. Tewksbury, Series Editor
`
`IEEE Circuits & Systems Society, Sponsor
`IEEE Solid-State Circuits Society, Sponsor
`
`IEEE
`PRESS
`
`Z,
`
`The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc., New York
`
`5
`
`

`

`This book and other books may be purchased at a discount
`from the publisher when ordered in bulk quantities. Contact:
`
`IEEE Press Marketing
`Attn: Special Sales
`Piscataway, NJ 08855-1331
`Fax: (732) 981-9334
`
`For more information about IEEE PRESSproducts,
`visit the IEEE HomePage: http://www.ieee.org/
`
`© 1998 by the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers,Inc.
`345 East 47th Street, New York, NY 10017-2394
`
`All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced in anyform,
`nor mayit be stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in anyform,
`without written permission from the publisher.
`
`Printed in the United States of America
`10
`9
`8
`7
`6
`5
`4
`3
`
`ISBN 0-7803-3416-7
`IEEE Order Number: PC5689
`
`Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data
`
`Baker, R. Jacob (date)
`CMOScircuit design, layout, and simulation / R. Jacob Baker,
`Harry W. Li, and David E. Boyce.
`p.
`cm. -- (IEEE Press series on microelectronic systems)
`Includes bibliographical references and index.
`ISBN 0-7803-3416-7
`
`1, Metal oxide semiconductors, Complementary--Design and
`construction,
`2. Integrated circuits--Design and construction.
`3. Metal oxide semiconductorfield-effect transistors,
`I. Li,
`Harry W.
`II. Boyce, David E.
`III. Title.
`IV. Series
`TK7871.99.M44B35
`1997
`621.3815--DC21
`
`97-21906
`
`CIP
`
`6
`
`

`

`
`
`32 Part I CMOS Fundamentals
`
`Layout (top view)
`
`(b)
`
`A
`
`B
`
`Figure 2.9 (a) Figure for the calculation of the resistance of a corner section and
`(b) layout to avoid corners.
`
`2.3.1 The N-well Resistor
`
`At this point, it is appropriate to show the actual cross-sectional view of the n-well after
`all processing steps are completed (Fig. 2.10). The n+ and p+ implants are used to
`increase the threshold voltage of the field devices; more will be said on this later in Ch.
`4, Notice in Appendix A, the Orbit electrical parameters, that the sheet resistanceof the
`n-well is measured with the field implant in place, that is, with the n+ implant between
`the two metal connections in Fig. 2.10. Not shown in Fig. 2.10 is the connection to
`substrate. The field oxide (FOX; also known as ROX or recessed oxide) will be
`discussed in Ch. 4 when wediscuss the active and poly layers.
`
`Metal
`
`Metal p+ field implant
`
`n+ field implant
`
`p-substrate
`
`n+ active implant
`
`Figure 2.10 Cross-sectional view of n-well showing field implant. The
`field implantation is sometimes called the “channel stop implant’.
`
`2.4 The N-well/substrate Diode
`
`it is important to
`in the p-substrate forms a diode. Therefore,
`Placing an n-well
`understand how to model a diode for hand calculations and in SPICE simulations.
`In
`particular,let's discuss diodes using the n-well/substrate pn junction as an example [2].
`The DCcharacteristics of the diode are given by the Shockley diode equation,or
`
`7
`
`

`

`Chapter 2 The Well
`
`a
`
`Ip = Ise a 1)
`
`33
`
`(2.4)
`
`The current J, is the diode current; J, is the scale (saturation) current; V, is the voltage
`across the diode where the anode (p-type material) is assumed positive with respect to
`the cathode (n-type); and V, is the thermal voltage which is given by ea where k =
`Boltzmann's constant (1.3806 x 10°joules per degree kelvin), T is temperature in
`kelvin, n is the emission coefficient (a term that is related to the doping profile and
`affects the exponential behaviorof the diode), and q is the electron charge of 1.6022 x
`10"? coulombs. The scale current and thus the overall diode current are related in
`SPICE byan area factor. The SPICEcircuit simulation program assumesthat the value
`of I, supplied in the model statement was measured for a device with a reference area of
`1. If an area factor of 2 is supplied for a diode, then J, is doubled in Eq.(2.4).
`
`2.4.1 Depletion Layer Capacitance
`
`N-type silicon has a number of mobile electrons, while p-type silicon has a number of
`mobile holes (a vacancy of electrons in the valence band). Formation of a pn junction
`results in a depleted region at the p-n interface (Fig. 2.11). A depletion region is an
`area depleted of mobile holes or electrons. The mobile electrons move across the
`junction, leaving behind fixed donor atoms and thus a positive charge. The movement
`of holes across the junction,
`to the right
`in Fig. 2.11, occurs for
`the p-type
`semiconductor as well with a resulting negative charge. The fixed atoms on each side
`of the junction within the depleted region exert a force on the electrons or holes that
`have crossed the junction. This equalizes the charge distribution in the diode,
`preventing further charges from crossing the diode junction and also gives rise to a
`parasitic (depletion) capacitance.
`
`Anode —_>t— Cathode
`
`
`
`Twoplates of a capacitor
`
`Figure 2.11 Simple illustration of depletion region formation in a pn junction.
`
`The depletion capacitance, C,, of a pn junction is given by
`Cio
`
`Cj =
`
`[- ()}
`
`(2.5)
`
`8
`
`

`

`
`
`34 Part I CMOS Fundamentals
`
`Cj» is the zero-bias capacitance of the pn junction, that is, the capacitance when the
`voltage across the diode is zero. V, is the voltage across the diode, m is the grading
`coefficient (showing how the silicon changes from n- to p-type), and oo is the built-in
`potential given by
`
`$0 = Vr-In[Mate
`
`N.
`
`nj
`
`(2.6)
`
`where N, and WN, are the dopings for the p- and n-type semiconductors, respectively, V,,
`is the thermal equivalent voltage (26 mV @ room temperature), and n, is the intrinsic
`carrier concentration ofsilicon (n, = 14.5 x 10° atoms/cm’).
`
`
`Example 2.3
`Sketch schematically the depletion capacitance of an n-well/p-substrate diode
`100 x 100 um? square given that the substrate doping is 10'S atoms/cm? and the
`well doping is 10'* atoms/cm’. The measured zero-bias depletion capacitance of
`the junction is 100 aF/m’, and the grading coefficient is 0.333. Assume the
`depth of the n-well is 3 um.
`
`Wecan begin this problem bycalculating the built-in potential using Eq. (2.6):
`16
`16
`do = (.026)-In—0--10= a7
`(14.5 x 10°)
`
`The depletion capacitance is made up of a bottom component and a sidewall
`componentas shownin Fig. 2.12.
`
`+Va=
`
`aT
`Bottom capacitance
`
`BK.
`Sidewall capacitance
`p-substrate
`
`Figure 2.12 A pn junction on the bottom andsides of the junction.
`
`The bottom zero-bias depletion capacitance, C,,, is given by
`
`Cy, = (Capacitance per Area) - (Bottom Area, which, for this example,is
`Cjoo = (100 aF/um?)- (100 um)? = 1 pF
`
`The sidewall zero-bias depletion capacitance, C,,,, is given by
`Cjos = (Capacitance per Area) - (Depth of the Well) - (Perimeter of the Well)
`
`or
`
`9
`
`

`

`Chapter 2 The Well
`
`35
`
`Cjos = (100 aF/um?)- (3 um) - (400 um) = 120 fF
`
`The total diode depletion capacitance between the n-well and the p-substrate is
`the parallel combination of the bottom and sidewall capacitances, or
`0p gr ce ee,a
`b-G)P b-@P b-@]
`
`C
`
`Ss
`
`Crp
`
`+
`
`Substituting in the numbers, we get
`Cm 1 pF + 0.120 pF
`~
`(-@)”
`
`A sketch of how this capacitance changes with reverse potential is given in Fig.
`2.13. Notice that when we discuss the depletion capacitance of a diode,it is
`usually with regard to a reverse bias. When the diode becomes forward-biased
`minority carriers, electrons in the p material and holes in the n material, injected
`across the junction, form a stored charge in and around the junction and give
`rise to a storage capacitance. This capacitance is usually much larger than the
`depletion capacitance. Furthermore,
`the time it takes to remove this stored
`charge can be significant. @
`
`Cj, diode depletion capacitance
`
`Cy, zero-bias depletion capacitance
`
`1.12 pF
`
`Vu, diode voltage
`
`Figure 2.13 Sketch of diode depletion capacitance against diode reverse voltage.
`
`2.4.2 Storage Capacitance
`
`Consider the charge distribution of a forward-biased diode shown in Fig. 2.14. When
`the diode becomes forward biased, electrons from the n-type side of the junction are
`attracted to the p-type side (and vice versa for the holes). After an electron drifts across
`the junction, it starts to diffuse toward the metal contact.
`If the electron recombines,
`that is, falls into a hole, before it hits the metal contact, the diode is called a "long base
`diode." The time it takes an electron to diffuse from the junction to the point the
`electron recombines is called the carrier lifetime. For silicon this lifetime is on the
`order of 10 ps. If the distance between the junction and the metal contact is short, such
`that the electrons make it to the metal contact before recombining, the diode is said to
`be a "short base diode."
`In either case, the time between crossing the junction and
`
`10
`
`10
`
`

`

`
`
`36 Part I CMOS Fundamentals
`
`Metal contact
`
`Storage capacitance
`
`Minority carriers
`
`Figure 2.14 Charge distribution in a forward-biased diode.
`
`time, tr. A capacitance is formed between the
`recombining is called the transit
`electrons diffusing into the p-side and the holes diffusing into the n-side, that is, formed
`between the minority carriers.
`(Electrons are the minority carriers in the p-type
`semiconductor.) This capacitance is often called a diffusion capacitance or storage
`capacitance (due to the presence of the stored minority carriers around the junction).
`
`Wecan characterize the storage capacitance, C,, in terms of the minority carrier
`lifetime. Under DC operating conditions, the storage capacitance is given by
`Cs= Jp... tr
`nvr
`
`(2.7)
`
`I, is the DC current flowing through the forward-biased junction given by Eq. (2.4).
`Looking at the diode capacitance in this way is very useful for analog AC small-signal
`analysis. However, for digital applications we are more interested in the large-signal
`switching behavior of the diode. It should be pointed outthat in general, for a CMOS
`process,
`it
`is undesirable to have a forward-biased pn junction.
`If we do have a
`forward-biased junction, it usually means there is a problem, for example, electrostatic
`protection, capacitive feedthrough possibly causing latch-up, and so on. These topics
`are discussed in more detaillater in this chapter.
`
`In the following diode switching analysis, we will assume
`Consider Fig. 2.15.
`that V, >> 0.7, V, < 0 and that the voltage source has been at V,. long enoughto reach
`steady-state condition; that is, the minority carriers have diffused out to an equilibrium
`condition. At the time f, the input voltage source makes an abrupttransition from V,, to
`V,, causing the current to change from = to “e, The diode voltage remains at 0.7 V
`since the diode contains a stored charge that must be removed . Attime ¢, the stored
`charge is removed. At this point, the diode basically looks like a voltage-dependent
`capacitor that follows Eq. (2.5).
`In other words for ¢ > t,
`the diode depletion
`capacitance is charged through R until the current in the circuit goes to zero and the
`voltage across the diode is V,. This accounts for the exponential decay of the current
`and voltage shownin Fig. 2.15.
`
`11
`
`11
`
`

`

`Chapter 2 The Well
`
`37
`
`PC)
`
`7
`
`Diode current
`
`Diode voltage
`
`
`
`time
`
`Figure 2.15 Diodetestcircuit.
`
`The diode storage time, the time it takes to remove the stored charge, t, ,
`simply the difference in f, and t,, or
`
`is
`
`t,=t,-t,
`
`(2.8)
`
`This time is also given by
`
`
`(2.9)
`ts=tr-In ER
`—iR
`de
`ep
`oe ;
`‘
`Vets
`Ves
`where — =ir and — =ir = a negative numberin this discussion. Notethat it is quite
`easy to determine the minority carrier lifetime using this test setup.
`
`Defining a time t,, where t¢, > t,, when the current in the diode becomes 10
`percent of =, we can define the diode reverse recovery time, or
`i =i
`
`(2.10)
`
`2.4.3 SPICE Modeling
`
`The SPICE (simulation program with IC emphasis) diode model parameters are listed
`in Table 2.1. The series resistance, R,, deserves some additional comment. This
`resistance results from the finite resistance of the semiconductor used in making the
`diode and the contact resistance, the resistance resulting from a metal contact to the
`semiconductor. At
`this point, we are only concerned with the resistance of the
`semiconductor.
`For a reverse-biased diode,
`the depletion layer width changes,
`increasing for larger reverse voltages (decreasing both the capacitance and series
`resistance, of the diode). However, when we modelthe series resistance, we use a
`constant value. In other words, SPICE will not show usthe effects of a varying R,.
`
`Example 2.4
`Using SPICE, explain what happens when a diode with a carrier lifetime of 30
`ns is taken from the forward-biased region to the reverse-biased region. Use the
`circuit shown in Fig. Ex2.4 to illustrate your understanding.
`
`We will assumea zero-bias depletion capacitance of 1 pF. The SPICE netlist for
`this circuit is shown below.
`
`12
`
`12
`
`

`

`
`
`Chapter
`
`The MOSFET
`
`At this point we should have some appreciation for the parasitics, that is, capacitances
`and resistances, associated with a CMOS process.
`In this chapter we discuss the
`MOSFEToperation. To beginlet's define the symbols used to denote the n-channel and
`p-channel MOSFETs(see Fig. 5.1). When the substrate is connected to VSS and the
`well is tied to VDD, wewill use the simplified models shownat the bottom ofthe figure.
`It is important to keep in mind that the MOSFETis a four-termina! device and that the
`source and drain of the MOSFETare interchangeable.
`
`Gate
`
`Drain
`bib
`
`+ |
`Vas _
`Source
`
`Drain
`
`Ip
`
`Gate
`
`+
`Vig
`Ss _
`Source
`
`n-channel
`
`Substrate (bulk)
`
`Symbol used
`when substrateis
`tied toVss
`
`Vse
`— |
`Gate
`
`Vse r
`=
`Gate
`
`Well (bulk)
`
`Source
`
`y Ip
`Drain
`
`Source
`
`Symbol used
`when wellis
`J tied toVDD
`Is
`Drain
`
`p-channel
`
`Figure 5.1 Symbols used for n- and p-channel MOSFETs.
`
`13
`
`13
`
`

`

`
`
`84 Part I CMOS Fundamentals
`
`5.1 The MOSFET Capacitances
`
`Consider the MOSFET shown in Fig. 5.2 and its associated cross-sectional view.
`Associated with the drain and source regions to the substrate is a depletion capacitance
`that was discussed in the previous chapter.
`In this section we will concentrate on the
`capacitances associated with the gate electrode, that is, the capacitance from the gate to
`groundin Fig. 5.2.
`
`Vas
`
`o-substrate
`
`||
`LD
`
`Figure 5.2 Cross-sectional view of MOSFET used to calculate capacitances.
`
`5.1.1 Case I: Accumulation
`
`Let's first consider the case when V,., < 0 (Fig. 5.3). Under this condition, mobile holes
`from the substrate are attracted under the gate oxide. The thickness of the oxide in the
`SPICE MOSFET modelis given by the parameter TOX. The capacitance between the
`gate electrode and the substrate electrode is given by
`Leta
`(L-2:-LD)-W
`TOX
`
`(5.1)
`
`fox:
`
`Coz
`
`where €,x(= 3.97 - 8.85 aF/um) is the dielectric constant of the gate oxide, W is the
`drawn width (neglecting oxide encroachment), and L—2- LD is the effective channel
`length. The capacitance between the gate and drain or source is given by
`
`_ €o,-LD-W
`Cga.5 = Tox = Gate-drain (or source) overlap capacitance
`
`(5.2)
`
`neglecting oxide encroachment. The gate-drain overlap capacitance is present in a
`MOSFETregardless of the biasing conditions. This capacitance is specified in SPICE
`MOSFET models by the variables CGDO and CGSO with units of farads/meter.
`Estimation of C,,, or C,, using the measured BSIM model parametersuses
`
`14
`
`14
`
`

`

`Chapter 5 The MOSFET
`
`and
`
`Eox Hi LD
`Cea = CGDO-W= TOX
`
`Cys = CGSO-W
`
`(farads)
`
`85
`
`(5,3)
`
`(5.4)
`
`The total capacitance, independent of the width and length of the MOSFET, between
`the gate and groundin thecircuit of Fig. 5.2 is the sum of C,,, C,,, and C,, and is given
`by
`
`(5.5)
`(farads/meter’)
`Ch.= =
`is called the oxide capacitance, which for
`the CN20 process is
`The term C/,
`approximately 800 aF/um’. Knowing the width and length of a MOSFETgivesa total
`capacitance from the gate of the MOSFETin Fig. 5.2 to ground of
`
`
`
`Co = Cl. WL
`
`(farads)
`
`(5.6)
`
`There is a significant resistance in series with C,, in Fig. 5.3 from the resistivity of the
`p-substrate. The resistivity of the n+ source and drain regions tends to be small enough
`to neglect in most circuit design applications.
`
`Ves <0
`
`
`
`
`
`Gate
`
`Overlap capacitances
`P
`cap
`
`:
`Drain
`
`connection
`
`Gate to substrate (bulk)
`capacitance
`Figure 5.3 MOSFETin accumulation.
`
`p-sub
`
`5.1.2 Case Il: Depletion
`
`Referring again to Fig. 5.2, let's consider the case when V,,, is not negative enough to
`attract a large numberof holes under the oxide and not positive enoughto attract a Jarge
`numberof electrons. Under these conditions, the surface under the gate is said to be
`depleted. Consider Fig. 5.4. As V,, is increased from some negative voltage, holes will
`be displaced under the gate, leaving immobile acceptor ions that contribute a negative
`charge. Wesee that as we increase V, a capacitance between the gate and the induced
`channel under the oxide exists. Also, a depletion capacitance between the induced
`channel and the substrate is formed. The capacitance between the gate and the
`
`15
`
`15
`
`

`

`
`
`86 Part | CMOS Fundamentals
`
`source/drain is simply the overlap capacitance, while the capacitance between the gate
`and the substrate is the oxide capacitance in series with the depletion capacitance. The
`depletion layer shown in Fig. 5.4 is formed between the substrate and the induced
`channel. The MOSFET operated in this region is said to be in weak inversion or the
`subthreshold region because the surface under the oxide is not heavily n+.
`
`Gate Attracted electrons, Q pyain
`
`
`
`es i
`Tk Ea
`\
`Depletion layer
`
`thickness, Xd
`
`p-sub
`
`Depletion layer
`
`Depletion capacitance
`in series with oxide C
`
`Figure 5.4 MOSFETin depeletion.
`
`5.1.3 Case Ill: Strong Inversion
`
`WhenV,., is sufficiently large (> V,,,,, the threshold voltage of the n-channel MOSFET)
`so that a large numberofelectrons are attracted under the gate, the surface is said to be
`inverted, that is, no longer p-type. Figure 5.5 shows how the capacitance from the gate
`to ground changes as V,, changes for the MOSFETconfiguration of Fig. 5.2. This
`figure can be misleading. Remember that when the MOSFETis in the accumulation
`region the majority of the capacitance to ground, C,, , runs through the large parasitic
`
`Accumulation
`
`
`
`
`
` f
`Cox
`
`
`
`.
`Inversion
`
`Good cap area
`
`Vas, V
`
`Depletion Bad cap area
`
`
`
`Figure 5.5 Capacitance to ground at the gate terminal of the circuit shown in Fig. 5.2
`plotted against the gate-source voltage.
`
`16
`
`16
`
`

`

`Chapter 5 The MOSFET
`
`87
`
`resistance of the substrate. Also note that the MOSFET makes a very good capacitor
`when V,.> Vay, + a few hundred mV. Wewill make a capacitor in this fashion many
`times while we are designing circuits.
`
`Example 5.1
`If
`Suppose the following MOSFET configuration is to be used as a capacitor.
`the width and length of the MOSFETare both 100 um, estimate the capacitance.
`Are there any restrictions on the voltages we can use across the capacitor?
`
`geex
`
`Gate}-— Source/drain
`—_-—
`
`WL = 100/100
`
`Since the MOSFETis to be used as a capacitor, we require operation in the
`strong inversion region, with the gate potential always at V,,,, + 100 mV above
`the source/drain potentials.
`The capacitance between the gate and the
`source/drain is then Cio = C4, -W-L. For the CN20 processthis results in
`
`Ctot = (800 aF/um?)(100 m)(100 um) = 8 pF
`
`Note that we did not concern ourselves with the substrate connection. Since we
`are assuming strong inversion, the bulk (substrate) connection will only affect
`the capacitances from the drain/source to substrate (those from the source/drain
`implant regions). We will see, however, that the connection of the substrate will
`significantly affect the threshold voltage of the devices. ™
`
`5.1.4 Summary
`
`is
`Figure 5.6 shows our MOSFET symbol with capacitances. The capacitance C,,
`associated with the gate poly overthe field region. The gate-drain capacitance, C,, and
`the gate-source capacitance C,, are determined by the region of operation (see Table
`5.1:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Table 5.1 MOSFETcapacitances.
`
`17
`
`17
`
`

`

`Chapter
`2/
`
`Dynamic Analog Circuits
`
`in reducing power
`Chapter 14 discussed dynamic digital circuits, which are useful
`dissipation and the number of MOSFETs used to perform a given circuit operation.
`Dynamic analogcircuits exploit the fact that information can be stored on a capacitor or
`gate capacitance of a MOSFETfor a period of time.
`In this chapter, we will discuss
`analog circuits such as sample and holds, current mirrors, amplifiers, and filters using
`dynamic techniques.
`
`27.1 The MOSFET Switch
`
`A fundamental component of any dynamiccircuit (analog or digital) is the switch (Fig.
`27.1). An importantattribute of the switch, in CMOSis that under DC conditions the
`gate of the MOSFETdoes not draw a current. Therefore, neglecting capacitances from
`the gate to the drain/source, we find that the gate control signal does not interfere with
`information being passed through the switch. Figure 27.2 shows the small-signal
`resistance of the switches of Fig. 27.1 plotted against drain-source voltage. The benefits
`of using the CMOStransmission gate are seen from this figure, namely, lower overall
`resistance. Another benefit of using the CMOSTG isthat it can pass a logic high or a
`
`i
`—{
`
`=
`
`3
`ae
`em
`
`i S
`
`witch
`
`Figure 27.1 MOSFETsused as switches.
`
`6
`L
`rT
`
`18
`
`18
`
`

`

`
`
`720 Part IV Mixed-Signal Circuits
`
` Vos
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`Figure 27.2 Small-signal on-resistance of MOSFETswitches [1].
`
`logic low without a threshold voltage drop. The largest voltage an n-channel switch can
`pass is VDD — V,,,,, while the lowest voltage a p-channel switch can passis Vyyp.
`
`While MOSswitches may offer substantial benefits, they are not without some
`detraction. Two nonideal effects typically associated with these switches may ultimately
`limit the use of MOS switches in some applications (particularly sampled-data circuits
`such as data converters). These two effects are known as charge injection and clock
`feedthrough.
`
`Charge Injection
`
`Charge injection can be understood with the help of Fig. 27.3. When the MOSFET
`switch is on and V,,
`is small, the charge under the gate oxide resulting from the
`inverted channel is (from Ch. 5) Q',. When the MOSFETturns off, this charge is
`injected onto the capacitor and into v,. Since v,, is assumed to be a low-impedance,
`source-driven node,
`the injected charge has no effect on this node. However, the
`charge injected onto C,,,, results in a change in voltage acrossit.
`
`
`
`
`
`Vin tL Ctoad—Vioad
`
`Charge injection
`
`Figure 27.3 Simple configuration using an NMOSswitch to show charge injection.
`
`19
`
`19
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket