Trials
`Brett Cooper; Trials
`Kappos, John; Westin, Cameron W.; Google-Scramoge-IPR; rak_scramoge@raklaw.com
`RE: IPR2022-00478, -00643, and -00683: Request for Extension
`Tuesday, July 12, 2022 8:34:41 AM
`
`From:
`To:
`Cc:
`Subject:
`Date:
`
`Counsel,
`
`Under the circumstances, the respective panels extend the date for the filing of a Patent
`Owner preliminary response to August 15, 2022. As a Patent Owner preliminary response is
`optional, there will be no further extension of this due date.
`
`Thank you,
`
`Megan Carlson
`Supervisory Paralegal Specialist
`Patent Trial and Appeal Board
`(571) 272-1650
`Megan.Carlson@uspto.gov
`
`From: Brett Cooper <bcooper@raklaw.com>
`Sent: Monday, July 11, 2022 10:47 AM
`To: Trials <Trials@USPTO.GOV>
`Cc: Kappos, John <jkappos@omm.com>; Westin, Cameron W. <cwestin@omm.com>; Google-
`Scramoge-IPR <PH-Google-Scramoge-IPR@paulhastings.com>; rak_scramoge@raklaw.com
`Subject: Re: IPR2022-00478, -00643, and -00683: Request for Extension
`
`CAUTION: This email has originated from a source outside of USPTO. PLEASE CONSIDER THE SOURCE before
`responding, clicking on links, or opening attachments.
`
`Dear Honorable Board,
`
`On June 6, 2022, Petitioner and Patent Owner filed a Joint Motion to Stay All Deadlines and Notice of
`Settlement in the parallel district court actions between the parties involving the challenged patents.
` That motion notified the Court that all matters in controversy between the parties have been
`settled, in principle, and requested that the Court stay all deadlines.
`
`On June 29, 2022, the Board granted an extension for the Patent Owner Preliminary Response until
`July 15, 2022, in each IPR. The Board further stated that “[t]here will [be] no further extensions of
`this due date."
`
`On June 30, 2022, the parties fully executed an agreement settling all matters in controversy
`between the parties. The parties provide this update to keep the Board informed of the procedural
`status of the settlement.
`
`IPR2022-00643
`Ex. 3002
`
`
`Brett Cooper; Trials
`Kappos, John; Westin, Cameron W.; Google-Scramoge-IPR; rak_scramoge@raklaw.com
`RE: IPR2022-00478, -00643, and -00683: Request for Extension
`Tuesday, July 12, 2022 8:34:41 AM
`
`From:
`To:
`Cc:
`Subject:
`Date:
`
`Counsel,
`
`Under the circumstances, the respective panels extend the date for the filing of a Patent
`Owner preliminary response to August 15, 2022. As a Patent Owner preliminary response is
`optional, there will be no further extension of this due date.
`
`Thank you,
`
`Megan Carlson
`Supervisory Paralegal Specialist
`Patent Trial and Appeal Board
`(571) 272-1650
`Megan.Carlson@uspto.gov
`
`From: Brett Cooper <bcooper@raklaw.com>
`Sent: Monday, July 11, 2022 10:47 AM
`To: Trials <Trials@USPTO.GOV>
`Cc: Kappos, John <jkappos@omm.com>; Westin, Cameron W. <cwestin@omm.com>; Google-
`Scramoge-IPR <PH-Google-Scramoge-IPR@paulhastings.com>; rak_scramoge@raklaw.com
`Subject: Re: IPR2022-00478, -00643, and -00683: Request for Extension
`
`CAUTION: This email has originated from a source outside of USPTO. PLEASE CONSIDER THE SOURCE before
`responding, clicking on links, or opening attachments.
`
`Dear Honorable Board,
`
`On June 6, 2022, Petitioner and Patent Owner filed a Joint Motion to Stay All Deadlines and Notice of
`Settlement in the parallel district court actions between the parties involving the challenged patents.
` That motion notified the Court that all matters in controversy between the parties have been
`settled, in principle, and requested that the Court stay all deadlines.
`
`On June 29, 2022, the Board granted an extension for the Patent Owner Preliminary Response until
`July 15, 2022, in each IPR. The Board further stated that “[t]here will [be] no further extensions of
`this due date."
`
`On June 30, 2022, the parties fully executed an agreement settling all matters in controversy
`between the parties. The parties provide this update to keep the Board informed of the procedural
`status of the settlement.
`
`IPR2022-00643
`Ex. 3002
`
`
`
`
`In light of the fully executed agreement, Patent Owner respectfully requests an extension
`until August 15, 2022 for Patent Owner’s Preliminary Responses to permit the parties time to
`perform their obligations set forth by the agreement and file motions to terminate the IPRs. The
`parties anticipate that motions to terminate the IPRs will be filed no later than August 15.
` The additional extension is warranted now in light of the executed agreement which requires
`additional time before the parties will be ready to file the motions to terminate. Patent Owner
`seeks the extension not for purposes of delay, but in recognition of the Board’s finite resources.
`
`Petitioner has indicated that it does not oppose Patent Owner’s request.
`
`The parties can make themselves available for a conference call, should the Board find it helpful.
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`Brett E. Cooper
`Russ August & Kabat
`Office (310) 826-7474 x281
`Mobile (516) 359-9668
`Facsimile (310) 826-6991
`bio | email | vCard
`
`On Jun 29, 2022, at 3:50 PM, Trials <trials@uspto.gov> wrote:
`
`Counsel:
`
`We have received requests to extend the due date for a Preliminary Response in each
`of the following cases, while the parties finalize a settlement agreement: IPR2022-
`00478, IPR2022-00643, IPR2022-00683. The due date for the Patent Owner Response
`is extended to July 15, 2022 in each case. There will no further extensions of this due
`date.
`
`Thank you,
`
`Megan Carlson
`Supervisory Paralegal Specialist
`Patent Trial and Appeal Board
`(571) 272-1650
`Megan.Carlson@uspto.gov
`
`
`From: Brett Cooper <bcooper@raklaw.com>
`Sent: Wednesday, June 29, 2022 1:31 PM
`To: Trials <Trials@USPTO.GOV>
`Cc: Kappos, John <jkappos@omm.com>; Westin, Cameron W. <cwestin@omm.com>;
`
`
`
`Google-Scramoge-IPR <PH-Google-Scramoge-
`IPR@paulhastings.com>; rak_scramoge@raklaw.com
`Subject: Re: IPR2022-00643: Request for Extension
`
`CAUTION: This email has originated from a source outside of USPTO. PLEASE CONSIDER THE
`SOURCE before responding, clicking on links, or opening attachments.
`
`Dear Honorable Board,
`
`The Board previously granted an extension until July 1 for Patent Owner’s Preliminary
`Response in the above-referenced IPR. Because the parties are still working to finalize the
`settlement agreement, the parties jointly request an additional 14-day extension until July 15
`for Patent Owner’s Preliminary Response. The parties anticipate that motions to terminate
`the IPR will be filed in due course. The parties can make themselves available for a
`conference call, should the Board find it helpful.
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`Brett E. Cooper
`Counsel for Patent Owner
`
`Brett E. Cooper
`Russ August & Kabat
`Office (310) 826-7474 x281
`Mobile (516) 359-9668
`Facsimile (310) 826-6991
`bio | email | vCard
`
`
`On Jun 9, 2022, at 5:54 PM, Brett Cooper <bcooper@raklaw.com> wrote:
`
`Dear Honorable Board,
`
`On June 6, Petitioner and Patent Owner filed a Joint Motion to Stay All
`Deadlines and Notice of Settlement in the parallel district court
`actions between the parties involving the challenged patents. That
`motion notified the Court that all matters in controversy between the
`parties have been settled, in principle, and requested that the Court stay
`all deadlines.
`
`In accordance with that joint motion to stay, the parties jointly request
`that the Board grant an extension until July 1, 2022, for Patent
`Owner’s Preliminary Response in IPR2022-00643 (US Patent 10,193,392).
` The parties anticipate that motions to terminate the IPRs will be filed in
`due course. The parties can make themselves available for a conference
`call, should the Board find it helpful.
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`Brett E. Cooper
`Counsel for Patent Owner
`
`Brett E. Cooper
`Russ August & Kabat
`Office (310) 826-7474 x281
`Mobile (516) 359-9668
`Facsimile (310) 826-6991
`bio | email | vCard
`
`
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
