UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`WACO DIVISION
`
`SCRAMOGE TECHNOLOGY LTD.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`Case No. 6:21-cv-00902-ADA
`
`v.
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD. and
`SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC.,
`
`Defendants.
`
`PLAINTIFF’S PRELIMINARY DISCLOSURE OF ASSERTED CLAIMS AND
`INFRINGEMENT CONTENTIONS TO DEFENDANTS SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS
`CO. LTD. AND SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC.
`
`Scramoge Technology Ltd. (“Plaintiff” or “Scramoge”) submits the following Preliminary
`
`Disclosure of Asserted Claims and Infringement Contentions to Defendants Samsung Electronics
`
`Co. Ltd. and Samsung Electronics America, Inc. (“Defendants” or “Samsung”). This disclosure
`
`is based on the information available to Scramoge as of the date of this disclosure, and Scramoge
`
`reserves the right to amend this disclosure to the full extent consistent with the Court’s Rules and
`
`Orders.
`
`I.
`
`Asserted Claims
`
`Scramoge asserts that Samsung has infringed and continue to infringe at least the following
`
`claims of Scramoge’s patents (collectively, the “Asserted Claims”):
`
`A. U.S. Patent No. 9,490,652 (“the ’652 Patent”): Claims 1 and 2.
`
`B. U.S. Patent No. 10,199,876 (“the ’876 Patent”): Claims 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7.
`
`C. U.S. Patent No. 10,193,392 (“the ’392 Patent”): Claims 1, 6, 7, and 8.
`
`Page 1 of 8
`
`GOOGLE AND SAMSUNG EXHIBIT 1009
`
`

`

`D. U.S. Patent No. 7,825,537 (“the ’537 Patent”): Claims 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13,
`
`14, 15, 16, 20, 21, 22, and 28.
`
`Scramoge reserves the right to seek leave of court to add, delete, substitute, or otherwise
`
`amend this list of asserted claims should further discovery, the Court’s claim construction, or other
`
`circumstances so merit.
`
`II.
`
`Accused Products
`
`Scramoge contends that the Asserted Claims are infringed by the various apparatuses used,
`
`made, sold, offered for sale, or imported into the United States by Samsung (the “Accused
`
`Products”). The Accused Products include at least the following, as well as products with
`
`reasonably similar functionality:
`
`•
`
`’652 Patent: Wireless Charger Portable Battery 10,000 mAh (EB-U1200) and
`
`25W Wireless Portable Battery (EB-U3300).
`
`•
`
`’876 Patent: Wireless Charger (EP-NG930), Fast Charge Wireless Charging Pad
`
`(EP-PN920), Fast Charge Wireless Charging Convertible (EPPG950), Fast Charge
`
`Wireless Charger Stand (EP-N5100), Wireless Charger Stand 9W (EPN5105),
`
`Wireless Charger Stand 15W (EP-N5200), and Duo Charger (EP-N6100).
`
`•
`
`’392 Patent: Samsung Wireless Charger Stand (EPNG930, EP-N5100, EP-
`
`N5105), Samsung Wireless Charger (EP-PA510, EP-PG920I, EP-PN920, EP-
`
`P3100, EP-P1100, EP-P1300), Wireless Charger Pad 9W (EP-P3105), Fast Charge
`
`Wireless Charging Convertible (EP-PG950), Wireless Charger Stand 15W (EP-
`
`N5200), Convertible Wireless Charging Stand (EP-N3300), Wireless Charging
`
`Duo Pad (EP-P5200), Wireless Charger Duo (EP-N6100, EP-P4300), Wireless
`
`Charger Tray (EP-PA710), Wireless Charger Trio (EPP6300), Wireless Charging
`
`
`
`2
`
`Page 2 of 8
`
`

`

`Vehicle Dock (EP-HN910I), UV Sanitizer With Wireless Charging (GP-TOU020)
`
`and all Samsung Wireless Chargers and Charging Docks for the Galaxy Watch
`
`(including but not limited to any chargers sold with or as an accessory to the Galaxy
`
`Watch, Galaxy Watch 3, Galaxy Watch 4, Galaxy Watch Active, Galaxy Active 2,
`
`EP-OR825, and EP-Y0805).
`
`•
`
`’537 Patent: Wireless Charger Portable Battery 10,000 mAh(EB-U1200), 25W
`
`Wireless Portable Battery (EB-U3300), Wireless Charger Stand (EP-NG930, EP-
`
`N5100, EP-N5105), Samsung Wireless Charger (EP-PA510, EP-PG920I,
`
`EPPN920, EP-P3100, EP-P1100, EP-P1300), Wireless Charger Pad 9W (EP-
`
`P3105), Fast Charge Wireless Charging Convertible (EP-PG950), Wireless
`
`Charger Stand 15W (EP-N5200), Convertible Wireless Charging Stand (EP-
`
`N3300), Wireless Charging Duo Pad (EP-P5200), Wireless Charger Duo (EP-
`
`N6100, EP-P4300), Wireless Charger Tray (EP-PA710), Wireless Charger Trio
`
`(EP-P6300), Wireless Charging Vehicle Dock (EP-HN910I), UV Sanitizer With
`
`Wireless Charging (GP-TOU020), Samsung Watches sold with a wireless charger
`
`(including but not limited to Galaxy Watch, Galaxy Watch 3, Galaxy Watch 4,
`
`Galaxy Watch Active, Galaxy Active 2), and all Samsung Wireless Chargers and
`
`Charging Docks for the Galaxy Watch (including but not limited to any chargers
`
`sold with or as an accessory to the Galaxy Watch, Galaxy Watch 3, Galaxy Watch
`
`4, Galaxy Watch Active, Galaxy Active 2, EP-OR825, and EP-Y0805).
`
`Scramoge reserves the right to amend this list of accused instrumentalities, as well as other
`
`information contained in this document and the exhibits hereto, to incorporate new information
`
`learned during the course of discovery, including, but not limited to, the inclusion of newly
`
`
`
`3
`
`Page 3 of 8
`
`

`

`released products, versions, or any other equivalent devices ascertained through discovery.
`
`Further, to the extent any accused infringing products have gone through or will go through name
`
`changes, but were or will be used or sold with the same accused features, earlier corresponding
`
`products under different names also are accused.
`
`III. Claim Charts
`
`Claim charts identifying a location of every element of every asserted claim of the asserted
`
`Scramoge Patents within accused products are attached hereto as Exhibits A-D. Scramoge’s
`
`analysis of the Accused Products is based on limited publicly available information and based on
`
`Scramoge’s own investigation prior to any discovery in this action. In an effort to focus the issues,
`
`Scramoge identifies exemplary evidence for each claim limitation. The evidence cited for a
`
`particular limitation should be considered in light of the additional evidence cited for the other
`
`claim limitations. Scramoge reserves the right to rely on evidence cited for any particular
`
`limitation of an asserted claim for any other limitation asserted for that claim. Unless otherwise
`
`indicated, the information provided that corresponds to each claim element is considered to
`
`indicate that each claim element is found within each of the different variations of each respective
`
`Accused Products described above.
`
`Scramoge reserves the right to amend these claim charts, as well as other information
`
`contained in this document and the exhibits hereto. Scramoge further reserves the right to amend
`
`these claim charts to incorporate new information learned during the course of discovery,
`
`including, but not limited to, information that is not publicly available or readily discernible
`
`without discovery or undue burden.
`
`IV.
`
`Literal Infringement / Doctrine of Equivalents
`
`
`
`4
`
`Page 4 of 8
`
`

`

`Scramoge asserts that Samsung infringes the asserted claims listed above under at least 35
`
`U.S.C. § 271(a), (b), (c), and/or (f). Scramoge contends that Samsung has directly infringed and
`
`continues to directly infringe the asserted claims by making, using, offering for sale, selling, and
`
`importing into the United States the Accused Products. Scramoge also contends that Samsung (i)
`
`induces end users of the Accused Products to directly infringe the Asserted Claims and (ii)
`
`contributes to end users’ direct infringement of the Asserted Claims. Scramoge asserts that, under
`
`the proper construction of the asserted claims and their claim terms, the limitations of the asserted
`
`claims of the asserted Scramoge patents are literally present in the accused products, as set forth
`
`in the claim charts attached hereto as Exhibits A-D. Scramoge contends that any and all elements
`
`found not to be literally infringed are infringed under the doctrine of equivalents because the
`
`differences between the claimed inventions and the accused instrumentalities, if any, are
`
`insubstantial.
`
`Scramoge’s contention is that each limitation is literally met, and necessarily also would
`
`be met under the doctrine of equivalents because there are no substantial differences between the
`
`Accused Products and the claims, in function, way, or result. If Samsung attempts to argue that
`
`there is no infringement literally and also no infringement under doctrine of equivalents and
`
`attempts to draw any distinction between the claimed functionality and the functionality in the
`
`Accused Products, then Scramoge reserves its right to rebut the alleged distinction as a matter of
`
`literal infringement and/or as to whether any such distinction is substantial under the doctrine of
`
`equivalents.
`
`Scramoge reserves the right to amend its Infringement Contentions as to literal
`
`infringement or infringement under the doctrine of equivalents in light of new information learned
`
`during the course of discovery and the Court’s claim construction.
`
`
`
`5
`
`Page 5 of 8
`
`

`

`V.
`
`Priority Dates
`
`The Asserted Claims are entitled to a priority date of at least the following:
`
`A.
`
`U.S. Patent No. 9,490,652: Each asserted claim of the ’652 Patent is entitled to at
`
`least a priority date of July 24, 2013.
`
`B.
`
`U.S. Patent No. 10,199,876: Each asserted claim of the ’876 Patent is entitled to
`
`at least a priority date of December 14, 2012.
`
`C.
`
`U.S. Patent No. 10,193,392: Each asserted claim of the ’392 Patent is entitled to
`
`at least a priority date of January 8, 2014.
`
`D.
`
`U.S. Patent No. 7,825,537: Each asserted claim of the ’537 Patent is entitled to at
`
`least a priority date of November 14, 2008.
`
`VI.
`
`Identification of Instrumentalities Practicing the Claimed Inventions
`
`At this time, Scramoge is not relying on any assertion that any of its own instrumentalities
`
`practice the claims of the Asserted Patents.
`
`VII. Document Production Accompanying Disclosure
`
`Scramoge submits the following Document Production Accompanying Disclosure, along
`
`with an identification of the categories to which each of the documents corresponds.
`
`Scramoge is presently unaware of any documents sufficient to evidence any discussion
`
`with, disclosure to, or other manner of providing to a third party, or sale of or offer to sell, the
`
`inventions recited in the Asserted Claims of the asserted patents prior to the application date or
`
`priority date for the asserted patents. A diligent search continues for documents and Scramoge
`
`reserves the right to supplement this response.
`
`Scramoge is presently unaware of documents regarding the conception, reduction to
`
`practice, design, and development of each claimed invention of the asserted patents, which were
`
`
`
`6
`
`Page 6 of 8
`
`

`

`created before the date of application for the asserted patent or the priority date identified above.
`
`A diligent search continues for documents and Scramoge reserves the right to supplement this
`
`response.
`
`Scramoge identifies the following documents as being the file histories for the Asserted
`
`Patents: SCRAMOGE-SAMS2-00001277 - SCRAMOGE-SAMS2-00002658.
`
`
`
`Dated: January 28, 2022
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`By: /s/ Brett Cooper
`
`
`Brett E. Cooper (NY SBN 4011011)
`bcooper@raklaw.com
`Reza Mirzaie (CA SBN 246953)
`rmirzaie@raklaw.com
`Marc A. Fenster (CA SBN 181067)
`mfenster@raklaw.com
`Seth Hasenour (TX SBN 24059910)
`shasenour@raklaw.com
`Drew B. Hollander (NY SBN 5378096)
`dhollander@raklaw.com
`
`RUSS AUGUST & KABAT
`12424 Wilshire Blvd. 12th Floor
`Los Angeles, CA 90025
`Phone: (310) 826-7474
`Facsimile: (310) 826-6991
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiff Scramoge Technology
`Limited
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`7
`
`Page 7 of 8
`
`

`

`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`I certify that this document is being served upon counsel of record for Defendants on
`
`January 28, 2022 via electronic service.
`
`
`
`/s/ Drew Hollander
` Drew B. Hollander
`
`
`
`
`
`8
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Page 8 of 8
`
`