From: Tony Nguyen nguyen@fr.com
`Subject: FW: CPC v. Apple; CPC v. HMD - Markman Follow Up Schedule
`Date: February 11, 2022 at 9:53 AM
`To: Jennifer Bailey jennifer.bailey@eriseip.com, Adam Sandwell adam.sandwell@eriseip.com
`
`Also, FYI, from last night a3er our Markman.
`
`From: Peter Tong <Peter_Tong@txwd.uscourts.gov>
`Sent: Thursday, February 10, 2022 7:44 PM
`To: Tony Nguyen <nguyen@fr.com>; Ben.Roxborough@klgates.com; Benjamin C. Elacqua
`<Elacqua@fr.com>; bstevens@wscllp.com; BeUy Chen <bchen@fr.com>; DK.Kim@klgates.com;
`Eda Stark <stark@fr.com>; Beth.Gilman@klgates.com; george.summerfield@klgates.com;
`hcannom@wscllp.com; steve.ravel@kellyhart.com; Jim.Shimota@klgates.com;
`jonah.heemstra@klgates.com; Joy Kete <kete@fr.com>; Kate Quisenberry
`<quisenberry@fr.com>; kelly.ransom@kellyhart.com; Seth Sproul <sproul@fr.com>;
`stewart.mesher@klgates.com; Ben.Roxborough@klgates.com; dpekarekkrohn@perkinscoie.com;
`DK.Kim@klgates.com; Beth.Gilman@klgates.com; george.summerfield@klgates.com;
`Jim.Shimota@klgates.com; jonah.heemstra@klgates.com; jvillarreal@perkinscoie.com;
`mmoffa@perkinscoie.com; stewart.mesher@klgates.com; wmccabe@perkinscoie.com
`Subject: CPC v. Apple; CPC v. HMD - Markman Follow Up Schedule
`
`
`[This email originated outside of F&R.]
`
`
`Counsel for CPC, Apple, and HMD:
`
`The Court will construe all disputed means plus funcaon terms in their cases if the paraes cannot
`agree on their construcaon.
`
`The paraes in each case are ordered to meet and confer regarding expediang the schedule for
`narrowing the claims and prior art and scheduling a second Markman hearing if needed. The
`paraes are further ordered to file a joint moaon for a modified scheduling order within one
`week. Of course, if the paraes do not dispute any other means plus funcaon claims, then these
`orders do not apply.
`
`The Court typically gives 10 hours per side at trial. The Court strongly encourages the paraes to
`drop redundant claims and prior art. To discourage the paraes from needlessly preserving
`cumulaave claims or prior art, the Court will require each party’s expert to walk through every
`remaining asserted claim or prior art at trial.
`
`The Court suggests the following default schedule:
`
`
`Event
`Date
`February 28, 2022 Deadline for the first of three meet and confers to discuss
`significantly narrowing the number of claims and asserted prior art
`references at issue.
`
`IPR2022-00602
`Apple EX1078 Page 1
`
`

`

`Two weeks after
`the Final
`Contention
`Deadline
`July 13, 2022
`
`July 20, 2022
`
`July 20, 2022
`
`August 1, 2022
`
`references at issue.
`Deadline for the second of three meet and confers to discuss
`significantly narrowing the number of claims and asserted prior art
`references at issue.
`
`Final deadline to narrow the number of claims and asserted prior art
`references at issue. Any preserved claim or prior art must be
`asserted at trial.
`Parties to file updated status report and email the clerks if remaining
`means plus function claims require construction.
`Markman briefs due on any remaining disputed means plus function
`terms. Page limit of 1 page per disputed term. Parties to email the
`clerks to confirm Markman date. One round of briefing only.
`Markman hearing at 9 am.
`
`Peter Tong
`Law Clerk to the
`Honorable Alan D Albright
`U.S. District Court
`Western District of Texas
`Office: 254-750-1518
`
`**********************************************************************************
`******************************************
`This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may
`contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized use or
`disclosure is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact
`the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message.
`**********************************************************************************
`******************************************
`
`IPR2022-00602
`Apple EX1078 Page 2
`
`