Apple, Inc. v. CPC Patent Technologies Pty Ltd.
`IPR2022-00600
`
`Patent Owner’s Slides
`
`© Copyright 2020 by K&L Gates LLP. All rights reserved.
`
`Hearing – July 18, 2023
`
`CPC EXHIBIT 2005
`Apple Inc. v. CPC Patent Technologies PTY Ltd.
`IPR2022-00600
`
`Page 1 of 9
`
`Demonstrative Exhibit - Not Evidence
`
`
`IPR2022-00600
`
`Patent Owner’s Slides
`
`© Copyright 2020 by K&L Gates LLP. All rights reserved.
`
`Hearing – July 18, 2023
`
`CPC EXHIBIT 2005
`Apple Inc. v. CPC Patent Technologies PTY Ltd.
`IPR2022-00600
`
`Page 1 of 9
`
`Demonstrative Exhibit - Not Evidence
`
`
`
`K&L GATES
`
`“Defining”
`“Defining”
`
`Page 2 of 9
`
`Patent Owner Slide 2
`Patent Owner Slide 2
`
`Page 2 of 9
`
`
`
`1. A methodofenrolling in a biometric card pointer system,
`the method comprising the stepsof:
`receiving card information;
`he biometric signature;
`ependent upon the received card information, a
`[obtaincara information, First,|define]the memory
`location in a local memory externalto the card;
`memory
`‘determiningifthedefined memory location is unoccupied;
`
`location based on that information, secona;|store|
`
`Dr. Sears
`
`Q. So, again,
`
`just to repeat my question it's
`
`
`
`‘(039 Patent Claim 1
`‘039 Patent Claim 1
`
`K&L GATES
`
`and
`storing, if the memory location is unoccupied, the biomet-
`ric signature at the defined memory location.
`
`Ex. 1001, Claim 1
`
`the biometric signature at that defined memory
`
`location,
`
`third.
`
`That is the order that things happen in
`
`Claim 1, right?
`
`A.
`
`I believe that
`
`is the order in which
`
`things need to happen.
`
`Ex. 2004 at 14:2-10
`
`Source: Sur-Reply at 2
`
`Page 3 of 9
`
`Patent OwnerSlide 3
`Patent Owner Slide 3
`
`Page 3 of 9
`
`
`
`K&L GATES
`
`Dr. Sears
`
`QO.
`
`If the first authenticator is a player ID
`
`card that"s generated by the casino,
`
`the database
`
`entry is created first, and the first
`
`authenticator is then created and provided to the
`
`user;
`
`is that right?
`
`A.
`
`I believe from the reading of that one
`
`about -- that sounds accurate.
`
`Ex. 2004 at 31:12-18
`
`Bradford
`Bradford
`
`on United States Patent
`Herwdl feard ot al
`
`chs Pact Ses
`08) Thane of Pangaea:
`
`US 6612928 Bl
`‘Sen, 2, Zi
`
`PLANE TSTATR
`BEATER ess 1S 4 0Aa
`TAIMENT
`hevcaten Ebteed Tewor Bradberd [inbois
`WVillinge, ROW (Lh, Booher Asien
`Lact, br. Koes, 2 Ue Ae
`Pret Maret Cirshioedle, HV
`
`i ‘
`
`Sera Cheniges Creep. Bare, HY (LA
`Seep tee bey declare thes mreol oh
`poteet oe piteveded oe ceded mmches h
`Ga. DAbs 0ters.
`Ves predarei oo emtperd feo ereveed odes
`ect
`20) Aap es: DLT
`Sp
`Filet
`Jail 17, Hd
`0
`la, cu"
`Ty Us, 8
`Pelé efSeek
`
`a APe ea al.
`SAA 1b] fe
`Eeache ky,
`a A
`IS
`LABOR oySE A
`+See Bi
`+e" Bl
`+e) Aae
`+e i =
`“Cobol By a surmesnt
`Jitters Ponies Mk hip lees
`(M) deere Agee, or FeeMeri
`ooh
`ABSTEAC
`Aston ast mepdiee! fo rep hee pefareston io koe
`ef ap ler ie hgreg Ores cies cr ee
`cove) sateretevetos oe bee) om bmoreteny diets The Pas
`Hitiivkt ibe: ote wikration paces.
`Whine Gh Gace ith eee, briny Peeaed om Picea:
`doje, skew eo plese ae gets eel cele esther
`daumen whik coun af game mech, eli
`wlinfleetigally beard ome bk oid cea Oeee ad
`gimme machines. ae! fries Hee ces eed ofr aeab-
`beter. hating age feajiend Path bid ae ay ee
`esos aoe the ae dea pee oe ned
`cuetlng de game play bemon (makin me of de ge
`eiicaghemng ig rrbey
`
`2 dake, |b Blebag Shore
`
`Heeieremices odmand
`US RATA OUEST
`4 led A
`Terie Frome
`SahA eee lie
`AD Lio Sper
`
`dateGeet Die Heit AD beech La Hiei bBek Lipid
`Te ds Enero F
`Seypstems With Mewdeed 0 [evan ot
`
`= an
`tr
`
`
`
`Ex. 1004
`
`Source: Sur-Reply at 3-4
`
`Patent Owner Slide 4
`Patent Owner Slide 4
`
`Page 4 of 9
`
`Page 4 of 9
`
`
`
`Apple's Belated Construction
`
`Patent Owner Slide 5
`
`Page 5 of 9
`
`
`
`Defining ≠ Verifying
`
`Source: Sur-Reply at 6
`
`Patent Owner Slide 6
`
`Page 6 of 9
`
`
`
`K&L GATES
`
`“Storing”
`“Storing”
`
`Page 7 of 9
`
`Patent Owner Slide 7
`Patent Owner Slide 7
`
`Page 7 of 9
`
`
`
`Training # Storing
`Training ≠ Storing
`
`K&L GATES
`
`
`
`(02
`
`Present ID, Provide Information
`To Authorized Casino Person
`
`
`
`
`
`FIGURE 6
`Method Of Creating A Fingerprint-Based Record
`(Or Other Biometric Record) In A Database
`
`16
`.
`In box 614, the attendant makes use of the newly created
`
`§
`
`authenticator authentication process. This may involve the
`use of a newly created EFA, a W2G event, or simply
`identifving themselves to the system. The casino will choose
`which training scenario they want to present to the newly
`enrolled
`players. Box 614 is left and box 616 entered.
`
` ame device, if it ms a regular
`
`Ex. 1004 at 16:8-9
`
`
`
`
`Go To Game With FP System
`Inveke Privileged Screen Enabling
`
`Initial FP Read
`entry to demonstrate to the player the use of the two- (May Occur In Box 606 Or Box 612
`Provide A First Authenticator To Player
`
`
`
`
`
`If First Authenticator
`Is A Biometric Measurement)
`
`Input FP or FPs, As Needed Or
`Desired
`
`Explain Use To Player; Show Example
`Transaction With New BD Entry
`
`Authorized Casino Person Exits
`Privileged State Or Screen
`
`Read At Least One Fingerprint
`
`
`
`Player
`Enabled For Augmented FP-based
`Authorization And ID Transactions
`
`08
`
`Process Fingerprint data,
`(CreaDatabase Enury
`
`Ex. 1004, Fig. 6
`
`Source: Sur-Replvy at 7-8
`
`Page 8 of 9
`
`Patent Owner Slide 8
`Patent Owner Slide 8
`
`Page 8 of 9
`
`
`
`Foss and Yamane
`Foss and Yamane
`
`K&L GATES
`
`of checking a fingerprint presence flag. (Paper 1, 33-37).
`
`(Paper 12, 11). Foss is only relied upon in the Petition for
`
`clarification of receiving card data during an enrollmentprocess. (Paper 1, 2, 17, 25-
`
`30).
`
`CPC’s arguments (Paper 12, 20) regarding whether embodiments of Bradford
`
`and Yamane may permanently record and/or rewrite data and a pre-defined memory
`
`location are unresponsiveto the Petition, which relies on Yamane only for a method
`
`Source: Reply at 23, 26
`
`Page 9 of 9
`
`Patent OwnerSlide 9
`Patent Owner Slide 9
`
`Page 9 of 9
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
