throbber
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
` BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`Page 1
`
` Case No. IPR2022-00468
` Patent No. 10,512,027
`
`APPLE, INC.,
`
` Petitioner,
`
` -vs-
`
`TELEFONAKTIEBOLAGET LM
`ERICSSON,
`
` Patent Owner.
` __________________________________/
`
` DEPOSITION OF JONATHAN WELLS
`
` Wednesday, November 30, 2022 - 12:30 p.m.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Reported by:
`
`ERICA FIELD, RPR
`NY NOTARY NO. 01FI6443002
`FL NOTARY NO. GG 201026
`GA CCR NO. 5338-8044-2296-7296
`WA CCR NO. 22020479
`
`Job No.: 6188
`
`TransPerfect Legal Solutions
`212-400-8845 - Depo@TransPerfect.com
`
`

`

`Page 2
`
` APPEARANCES:
`
` On behalf of the Patent Owner:
` NOROOZI
` 11601 Wilshire Boulevard
` Suite 2170
` Los Angeles, California 90025
` (310) 975-7074
` BY: KAYVAN NOROOZI, ESQUIRE
` kayvan@noroozipc.com
`
` On behalf of the Petitioner:
` ERISE IP
` 5299 DTC Boulevard
` Suite 1340
` Greenwood Village, Colorado 80111
` (913) 777-5600
` BY: PAUL HART, ESQUIRE
` paul.hart@eriseip.com
`
`1
`
`2 3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`TransPerfect Legal Solutions
`212-400-8845 - Depo@TransPerfect.com
`
`

`

` INDEX OF PROCEEDINGS
`
`WITNESS PAGE
`JONATHAN WELLS
`DIRECT EXAMINATION BY MR. NOROOZI 4
`CERTIFICATE OF REPORTER 62
`
`Page 3
`
` NO EXHIBITS MARKED
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4 5 6 7 8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`TransPerfect Legal Solutions
`212-400-8845 - Depo@TransPerfect.com
`
`

`

`Page 4
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
` Thereupon,
`
` the proceedings began at 12:30 p.m.:
`
` THE STENOGRAPHER: Raise your
`
` right hand, please.
`
` Do you solemnly swear or affirm
`
` the testimony you are about to give in
`
` this matter will be the truth, the
`
` whole truth and nothing but the truth?
`
` THE WITNESS: Yes, I do.
`
` Thereupon,
`
` JONATHAN WELLS,
`
` having been first duly sworn or affirmed, was
`
` examined and testified as follows:
`
` DIRECT EXAMINATION
`
` BY MR. NOROOZI:
`
` Q. Good morning, Dr. Wells. Where
`
` are you located?
`
` A. Good morning. I'm located in
`
` Scottsdale, Arizona.
`
` Q. And you have some exhibits with
`
` you for this deposition?
`
` A. I mean, I'm at my computer. I can
`
` pull up exhibits.
`
` Q. Understood.
`
` Do you have anything printed out
`
`TransPerfect Legal Solutions
`212-400-8845 - Depo@TransPerfect.com
`
`

`

`Page 5
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
` with you?
`
` A. No, I don't.
`
` Q. So if you need to look at
`
` something, you will pull it up on your
`
` computer?
`
` A. Yes, I can do that.
`
` Q. Do you have any chats open right
`
` now?
`
` A. No, I don't. Nothing.
`
` Q. You understand that you're not
`
` allowed to chat with your counsel about the
`
` substance of this deposition while the
`
` deposition is ongoing?
`
` A. That is my understanding, yes.
`
` Q. How did you prepare, sir?
`
` A. For this deposition?
`
` Q. Yes, sir.
`
` A. I read through my declaration. I
`
` read through the patent, the '027 Patent. I
`
` read through the prior art that I assert
`
` against the patent. I also had a meeting --
`
` a conference call with counsel for Apple to
`
` discuss various aspects of this deposition.
`
` Q. And how long did you spend
`
` preparing?
`
`TransPerfect Legal Solutions
`212-400-8845 - Depo@TransPerfect.com
`
`

`

`Page 6
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
` A. Maybe about five or six hours,
`
` perhaps more.
`
` Q. Were you familiar with any of the
`
` patents or art at issue in this proceeding
`
` before you were engaged?
`
` A. Yes.
`
` Q. And are you answering that in the
`
` context of being familiar with specific
`
` references or with just the sort of -- the
`
` technical area as a whole?
`
` A. Both.
`
` Q. So which references were you
`
` familiar with before you were engaged?
`
` A. All of the references.
`
` Q. Is that because you were
`
` previously engaged by Samsung with respect to
`
` a similar IPR?
`
` A. That's what I was thinking, yes.
`
` Q. And before you were engaged by
`
` Samsung, were you familiar with any of the
`
` references in this proceeding?
`
` A. I'm not entirely sure, but
`
` probably not.
`
` Q. Sir, do you have the '027 Patent?
`
` A. I do have it.
`
`TransPerfect Legal Solutions
`212-400-8845 - Depo@TransPerfect.com
`
`

`

`Page 7
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
` Q. I believe it is referred to as
`
` Exhibit 1001 in this proceeding. Let's refer
`
` to it by that same exhibit number.
`
` And if you could go to Claim 1 of
`
` the '027 Patent, please, and please let me
`
` know when you're there.
`
` A. Yes, I'm there.
`
` Q. Do you see that the patent begins
`
` by reciting a method for requesting system
`
` information?
`
` A. Yes, I do.
`
` Q. What is your understanding of the
`
` meaning of system information?
`
` A. So I also have a copy of my
`
` declaration here. I talk about my
`
` understanding of system information in the
`
` overview of the technology section where I
`
` talk about system information.
`
` Q. Would you be able to point me to a
`
` paragraph, sir?
`
` A. Yes. Paragraphs 31 to 32 are an
`
` introduction to system information and system
`
` information blocks.
`
` Q. So what is your understanding of
`
` system information?
`
`TransPerfect Legal Solutions
`212-400-8845 - Depo@TransPerfect.com
`
`

`

`Page 8
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
` A. I would say, generally speaking,
`
` system information is -- it's information
`
` about a system and how a system operates.
`
` Q. Is that your understanding of
`
` system information in the context of the
`
` technology of the '027 Patent?
`
` A. Yes, it is.
`
` Q. So it's your understanding that,
`
` for purposes of the '027 Patent, system
`
` information can be any information about a
`
` system and how it operates?
`
` A. Well, system information generally
`
` is any information about a system. The '027
`
` Patent is a little more specific in that it's
`
` about system information that's transmitted
`
` in MIBs, M-I-B, and SIB, S-I-B.
`
` Q. Right.
`
` But in terms of what the system
`
` information can constitute, is it your
`
` understanding, for purposes of the '027
`
` Patent, that the system information can be
`
` any information about a system?
`
` A. Yes, I think it can be.
`
` Q. Is system information always
`
` organized into blocks?
`
`TransPerfect Legal Solutions
`212-400-8845 - Depo@TransPerfect.com
`
`

`

`Page 9
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
` MR. HART: Objection. Form.
`
` A. I think it depends what you mean
`
` by blocks because system information is known
`
` to be organized into what's called SIBs,
`
` S-I-B, plural SIBs, which is a system
`
` information block. It can also be organized
`
` into a MIB, a master information block.
`
` Those are examples of system information that
`
` are organized into blocks.
`
` BY MR. NOROOZI:
`
` Q. My question is, is it possible and
`
` known in the art to have system information
`
` that is not organized into blocks?
`
` A. I mean, that's not something I've
`
` analyzed. It may well be.
`
` Q. Does system information in this
`
` field of art necessarily have to be organized
`
` into blocks?
`
` A. I can't answer that question. I
`
` don't know.
`
` Q. Can system information be grouped
`
` in this field of art in some way other than
`
` by creating system information blocks?
`
` A. I think that's sort of the same
`
` question. I mean, it may be. I don't know.
`
`TransPerfect Legal Solutions
`212-400-8845 - Depo@TransPerfect.com
`
`

`

`Page 10
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
` I've just studied what's disclosed in the
`
` '027 Patent and the prior art that I've cited
`
` to.
`
` Q. So you don't know whether a group
`
` of system information is necessarily system
`
` information blocks?
`
` MR. HART: Objection. Form.
`
` A. So, as I said, the '027 Patent is
`
` about system information blocks and master
`
` information blocks and how system information
`
` is used in MIBs and SIBs. That's what I've
`
` analyzed.
`
` There may be other ways in which
`
` system information has been organized
`
` somewhere else, but I haven't analyzed that.
`
` I just analyzed what's in the patent, the
`
` '027 Patent.
`
` BY MR. NOROOZI:
`
` Q. Do you know whether in this field
`
` of art it's possible to group system
`
` information without creating system
`
` information blocks?
`
` MR. HART: Objection. Form.
`
` A. Again, I think you're asking me
`
` the same question again. I've only focused
`
`TransPerfect Legal Solutions
`212-400-8845 - Depo@TransPerfect.com
`
`

`

`Page 11
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
` on what is the '027 Patent and the prior art
`
` that I used to render it obvious. I don't
`
` know whether that's possible or not in the
`
` context of everything in the wireless
`
` communication field.
`
` BY MR. NOROOZI:
`
` Q. Within the context of the '027
`
` Patent and the prior art that you analyzed,
`
` do you know whether it's possible to group
`
` system information without creating system
`
` information blocks?
`
` A. Yes, it is because you can have
`
` master information blocks as well.
`
` Q. With the -- withdrawn.
`
` Setting aside master information
`
` blocks and focusing on the prior art that you
`
` analyzed, do you know whether it's possible
`
` to group system information without creating
`
` system information blocks?
`
` A. I would have to go back and reread
`
` that prior art. I don't know sitting here.
`
` I just focused on the claims of the '027
`
` Patent and how that's disclosed in the prior
`
` art.
`
` Q. Do you understand that Claim 1 of
`
`TransPerfect Legal Solutions
`212-400-8845 - Depo@TransPerfect.com
`
`

`

`Page 12
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
` the '027 Patent requires organizing system
`
` information at two levels, first into blocks,
`
` then into block groups?
`
` A. Well, I don't see that language in
`
` Claim 1. That might be a general way of
`
` describing it, but Claim 1, I look at the
`
` words of the patent. It doesn't say those
`
` words in the patent in Claim 1.
`
` Q. Do you agree that system
`
` information -- withdrawn.
`
` Do you agree that Claim 1 recites
`
` one or more system information blocks?
`
` A. Yes, it does.
`
` Q. Do you agree that Claim 1 further
`
` recites that one or more system information
`
` blocks comprise a system information block
`
` group?
`
` A. Well, I mean, it doesn't say --
`
` the claims don't explicitly say that. It
`
` says that one or more system information
`
` blocks are grouped.
`
` Q. What is your understanding of what
`
` Claim 1 requires with respect to a system
`
` information block group in terms of what can
`
` constitute a system information block group?
`
`TransPerfect Legal Solutions
`212-400-8845 - Depo@TransPerfect.com
`
`

`

`Page 13
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
` A. Well, the first limitation has a
`
` wherein clause, and that wherein clause says
`
` wherein the one or more system -- beg your
`
` pardon, let me start again. Wherein the one
`
` or more system information blocks are grouped
`
` according to a feature, et cetera.
`
` So it's saying that there's a
`
` group of system information blocks that can
`
` be one or more system information blocks.
`
` Q. I just want to know if there's any
`
` disagreement on this point.
`
` Do you agree, sir, that the '027
`
` Patent Claim 1 requires system information
`
` that is organized into blocks, which blocks
`
` are organized into at least one group?
`
` A. I think that's generally fair. It
`
` doesn't require that two-step -- doesn't
`
` explicitly require that two-step process that
`
` you just said, but there's certainly system
`
` information in a block, and one or more
`
` blocks form a group.
`
` Q. Do you see that the claim recites
`
` a preamble?
`
` A. I do.
`
` Q. What is a preamble in the context
`
`TransPerfect Legal Solutions
`212-400-8845 - Depo@TransPerfect.com
`
`

`

`Page 14
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
` of the '027 Patent claims?
`
` MR. HART: Objection. Form.
`
` A. I don't understand your question.
`
` Are you asking me in terms of patent law what
`
` a preamble is, or are you asking me what the
`
` preamble recites in Claim 1?
`
` BY MR. NOROOZI:
`
` Q. I think we have some confusion.
`
` You see that -- withdrawn.
`
` You see that Claim 1 of the '027
`
` Patent recites the term "a preamble"?
`
` A. Oh, I see. Yeah, I'm sorry. I
`
` beg your pardon.
`
` So when you're talking about
`
` preamble, you're talking about a preamble as
`
` it exists in electronics, not a preamble as
`
` it exists in patent law. I was confused with
`
` your questions. I'm sorry. Can you ask the
`
` question one more time, please?
`
` Q. Sure. Do you see that Claim 1 of
`
` the '027 Patent recites the words "using a
`
` preamble"?
`
` A. Yes, I do.
`
` Q. What is your understanding of what
`
` a preamble is as that term is recited in the
`
`TransPerfect Legal Solutions
`212-400-8845 - Depo@TransPerfect.com
`
`

`

`Page 15
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
` '027 Patent claims?
`
` A. So I think a preamble is a
`
` mental -- I've talked about this in my
`
` declaration, Paragraph 34. A preamble is a
`
` message sent by a UE to a base station, the
`
` content and characteristics of which are
`
` known in advance.
`
` Q. Known in advance by whom, so to
`
` speak?
`
` A. I think, generally speaking, a
`
` preamble is known in advance by the sender
`
` and the receiver so that it can be used to
`
` indicate something.
`
` Q. So are you saying that both the UE
`
` and the base station know the content and
`
` characteristics of the preamble in advance?
`
` MR. HART: Objection. Form.
`
` A. I'm saying that, generally
`
` speaking, the purpose of a preamble is to
`
` indicate something, both the transmitter and
`
` the receiver, the UE and a base station, in a
`
` cellular system would know that -- the
`
` characteristics in advance.
`
` BY MR. NOROOZI:
`
` Q. In advance of what? What point in
`
`TransPerfect Legal Solutions
`212-400-8845 - Depo@TransPerfect.com
`
`

`

`Page 16
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
` time are you referencing?
`
` A. Well, I mean, generally speaking,
`
` it's -- it would be in advance of the
`
` receiver decoding the information. It has to
`
` be able to extract something meaningful from
`
` the preamble, so it would know at least
`
` before it was decoded.
`
` Q. By receiver, do you mean the UE or
`
` the base station?
`
` A. Whoever is receiving -- I mean,
`
` I'm talking generally here a preamble. It's
`
` transmitted by either a UE or a base station,
`
` and it's received by either a UE or a base
`
` station.
`
` Q. So are you saying that in the
`
` context of the '027 Patent, a preamble is
`
` something for which the UE knows the content
`
` and characteristics before it has received
`
` any such preamble from the base station?
`
` MR. HART: Objection. Form.
`
` A. No, that's not what I'm saying. I
`
` was talking -- you were asking me what a
`
` preamble was, and I was answering generally
`
` what a preamble was. I wasn't answering in
`
` the context of the '027 Patent claim
`
`TransPerfect Legal Solutions
`212-400-8845 - Depo@TransPerfect.com
`
`

`

`Page 17
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
` specifically.
`
` BY MR. NOROOZI:
`
` Q. Right.
`
` And, to be clear, my question was
`
` specifically about the '027 Patent claims.
`
` So are you with me on that point
`
` now?
`
` A. Yes. Okay.
`
` Q. So in the context of the '027
`
` Patent claims, what is your understanding of
`
` the meaning of a preamble as recited in those
`
` claims?
`
` A. So, as recited in the claims of
`
` the '027 Patent, a preamble is a message sent
`
` by the UE to a base station to indicate
`
` something.
`
` Q. Is there any more to it than what
`
` you just described, or do you think that's
`
` the full extent of the meaning of preamble in
`
` the context of the '027 Patent claims?
`
` A. Well, I'm looking at Claim 1, and
`
` it just requires a preamble to be transmitted
`
` to indicate something. There's no other
`
` requirement placed on preamble.
`
` Q. So is it your opinion that any
`
`TransPerfect Legal Solutions
`212-400-8845 - Depo@TransPerfect.com
`
`

`

`Page 18
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
` kind of message can be a preamble as recited
`
` in the '027 Patent claims?
`
` MR. HART: Objection. Form.
`
` A. No, I don't think any kind of
`
` message can be.
`
` BY MR. NOROOZI:
`
` Q. So can you specify what you think
`
` can and cannot be a preamble in the context
`
` of the '027 Patent claims?
`
` A. Well, I think a preamble has a
`
` meaning to a person of skill. It's -- and,
`
` like I explained, generally speaking, a
`
` preamble is a message that's sent in advance
`
` to indicate something.
`
` So a preamble has a meaning to a
`
` person of skill. And then the claim uses a
`
` preamble to be transmitted for indicating, in
`
` the case of Claim 1, at least one system
`
` information block group.
`
` Q. In the Agiwal reference, you opine
`
` that Agiwal disposes a preamble as recited in
`
` the '027 Patent claims, right?
`
` A. Yes, I do.
`
` Q. What does Agiwal's preamble
`
` consist of?
`
`TransPerfect Legal Solutions
`212-400-8845 - Depo@TransPerfect.com
`
`

`

`Page 19
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
` A. Agiwal certainly discloses that it
`
` transmits a preamble -- the UE transmits a
`
` preamble. I'm not sure whether Agiwal
`
` discloses what that preamble consists of. I
`
` would need to read through Agiwal to see if
`
` that's disclosed.
`
` Q. Do you have any opinion or
`
` understanding of what information Agiwal's
`
` preamble contains?
`
` A. Can you ask the question one more
`
` time, please?
`
` Q. Do you have any opinion or
`
` understanding of what information Agiwal's
`
` preamble contains?
`
` A. I mean, I'm struggling to answer
`
` that because what it contains -- do you mean
`
` what information is actually embedded inside
`
` the preamble message or what it's used to
`
` indicate?
`
` Q. What information is actually
`
` embedded inside Agiwal's preamble message?
`
` A. I haven't looked at Agiwal to
`
` understand that. I've just -- Agiwal
`
` discloses that it sends a preamble. That's
`
` what's required by the claims of the '027
`
`TransPerfect Legal Solutions
`212-400-8845 - Depo@TransPerfect.com
`
`

`

`Page 20
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
` Patent.
`
` Q. With respect to the Deenoo
`
` reference, what information is embedded in
`
` the alleged preamble that you opine Deenoo
`
` teaches?
`
` A. Again, I would have to look at
`
` Deenoo to understand that. I've just
`
` analyzed Deenoo in the context of the '027
`
` Patent claims, which require the transmission
`
` of a preamble.
`
` Q. So, prior to today, you didn't
`
` analyze what information is actually
`
` contained in Deenoo's preamble?
`
` A. I haven't done that. I didn't
`
` need to do that to show that Deenoo renders
`
` obvious the claims of the '027 Patent.
`
` Q. How does Agiwal obtain the
`
` preamble that it will use in a given
`
` instance?
`
` MR. HART: Objection. Form.
`
` A. How do you mean "obtain"? I can't
`
` understand your question.
`
` BY MR. NOROOZI:
`
` Q. Where does Agiwal -- withdrawn.
`
` You opine that Agiwal's UE sends a
`
`TransPerfect Legal Solutions
`212-400-8845 - Depo@TransPerfect.com
`
`

`

`Page 21
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
` preamble to the base station, fair?
`
` A. Yes.
`
` Q. Where does Agiwal's UE get the
`
` preamble that it sends to the base station?
`
` A. I haven't analyzed that. It's not
`
` something that I needed to analyze to form my
`
` opinion, my opinions.
`
` Q. Do you know whether Agiwal's UE
`
` creates the preamble or asked for a specific
`
` preamble or just asked for a preamble in
`
` general or it's provided the preamble without
`
` asking from the base station?
`
` Do you know as between those
`
` choices whether any of those are true?
`
` A. Off the top of my head, I don't
`
` know. I would have to read Agiwal to
`
` determine that.
`
` Q. Did you ever do that?
`
` A. Did I ever read Agiwal? Yes. Did
`
` I ever read Agiwal to determine explicitly
`
` what you just said? No, of course not.
`
` That's not something that's required by the
`
` '027 Patent claims.
`
` Q. With respect to Deenoo, how does
`
` Deenoo's UE obtain the preamble that it sends
`
`TransPerfect Legal Solutions
`212-400-8845 - Depo@TransPerfect.com
`
`

`

`Page 22
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
` to the base station as part of your
`
` invalidity theory?
`
` MR. HART: Objection. Form.
`
` Objection. Foundation.
`
` A. I'm not aware how it does it,
`
` sitting here.
`
` BY MR. NOROOZI:
`
` Q. Did you have an opinion on that
`
` issue in your declaration?
`
` A. I don't believe I expressed an
`
` opinion of that in my declaration. I don't

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket