throbber

`
`LTE-ADVANCED AND 4G WIRELESS
`
`
`
`COMMUNICATIONS: PART 2
`
`Minimization of
`
`
`Drive Tests Solution in 3GPP
`
`
`
`Wuri A. Hapsari, Anil Umesh, and Mikio lwamura, NTT DOCOMO, INC.
`
`
`
`Nokia Siemens Networks
`
`Malgorzata Tomala, 86dog Gyu/a, and Benoist Sebire,
`
`
`
`
`
`ABSTRACT
`
`tain parameters or to deploy new base stations.
`
`
`
`
`
`However, conventional drive tests consume
`
`
`
`significant time and human efforts to obtain reli­
`
`
`
`
`Providing network coverage and quality of
`
`
`
`
`
`
`service (QoS) is an important task of a cellular able data, since typically, the obtained data only
`
`
`
`
`
`covers certain area of the network, e.g., roads
`
`
`
`
`network operator. This is because cellular spec­
`
`
`
`trum is normally licensed under certain coverage
`
`and motorways. This has led to a huge amount
`
`
`
`
`
`obligations, and operators need to be competi­of OPEX and delays in detecting problems on
`
`
`
`tive in market. To improve their networks, oper­
`
`
`the network and in taking countermeasures.
`
`
`ators often send engineers in the field to collect
`
`
`These problems have also been continuously dis­
`
`
`cussed by the operators in the Next Generation
`
`radio measurements, to discover problems such
`
`
`as coverage holes in the network, and to deter­
`
`
`Mobile Networks (NGMN) alliance, a non-stan­
`
`
`mine whet.her certain parameter tuning is need­
`
`
`dardization organization from where a consoli­
`
`
`
`ed. However, such conventional "drive tests"
`
`
`dated operators' requirement for automated
`
`
`
`require large Operation Expenditure (OPEX),
`
`
`drive tests and recommendation solutions were
`
`delivered (2).
`
`
`while the collected measurements can only give
`Driven by these problems and demands, oper­
`
`
`
`
`limited snap shots of the entire network. In their
`
`
`
`Release 10 (Rel-10) specification, 3GPP studied
`
`
`
`ators proposed to standardize solutions in 3GPP
`
`
`to circumvent the cost for drive tests. In light of
`
`and specified solutions to reduce this OPEX for
`
`drive tests, under the work item named "Mini­
`
`
`such necessity, a work item called "Minimization
`
`mization of Drive Tests ( MDT)." The solution
`
`of Drive Tests (MDT)" was created in 3GPP in
`
`
`
`
`
`
`utilizes the user (customer) equipments (UEs) to March 2009 (3] scoping two Radio Access Tech­
`
`
`
`nologies (RATs), i.e., Long Term Evolution
`
`
`
`collect field measurements, including radio mea­
`
`
`
`(LTE) and Universal Mobile Telecommunica­
`
`
`
`surements and location information. This article
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`describes in details the solution adopted in tions System (UMTS). The main concept was to
`
`
`3GPP MDT; how they were developed and
`
`
`
`exploit commercial user equipments (UEs) -
`
`their measurement capabilities and geographi­
`
`intended to be used.
`
`
`
`cally spread nature -for collecting radio mea­
`
`
`surements. The work item was finalized in March
`
`2011 as part of 3GPP Rel-10 specification.
`
`
`of MDT defined in Rel-10
`
`
`Conventional drive test is a manual process. To The key features
`
`
`
`
`collect network quality information, an operator
`are as follows:
`•The ability of the UE to include location
`
`
`
`
`
`often needs to send engineers directly to the
`
`
`
`
`concerning area and obtain radio measurements information as part of the UE radio mea­
`
`surement reporting
`
`
`
`in a hand-operated manner. Typically, a mea­
`
`
`•The ability of the UE to log radio measure­
`
`
`
`
`surement vehicle, e.g., a van equipped with spe­
`
`ments during the UE's idle state
`
`
`
`cially developed test terminals, measurement
`
`•Reuse of radio measurements to those that
`
`
`
`devices, and a Global Positioning System (GPS)
`
`anyway have to be performed as part of
`
`
`
`
`receiver to obtain geographical location, is used
`
`normal Radio Resource Management
`
`
`to check coverage outdoors (1]. With such mea­
`
`
`
`(RRM) procedures, thereby minimizing
`
`surement vehicle, engineers would perform test
`
`
`
`additional complexity and battery consump­
`
`
`
`calls in the car and record measurement results
`tion by the UE.
`
`
`
`
`along the drive route. For indoor coverage engi­
`
`We describe the use case that would benefit
`
`
`
`neers perform "drive tests" on foot, using spe­
`
`from MDT. We discuss two fundamental
`
`
`
`
`cially developed measurement equipments that
`
`
`
`approaches to realizing MDT from architecture
`
`
`can be carried by hand. By analyzing these drive
`
`
`
`perspective. We explain in detail the functionali­
`
`
`test results, the operator can take necessary
`
`
`
`ties and signaling procedures adopted in 3GPP
`
`
`
`
`measures to maintain and enhance the quality of
`
`
`Rel-10, and describe the security aspects.
`
`
`
`
`the network, e.g., to decide whet.her to tune cer-
`
`INTRODUCTION
`
`28
`
`
`0163-6804/12/$25.00 © 2012 IEEE
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Authorized licensed use limijed to: West Virgnia University. Downloaded on January 26,2021 at 02:02 36 UTC from EEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
`
`
`
`
`
`IEEE Communications Magazine • June 2012
`
`IPR2022-00459
`Apple EX1008 Page 1
`
`

`

`RAN
`
`RAN
`
`UE
`
`UE
`
`MDT USE CASES
`
`MDT server
`
`MDT server
`
`TI1e motives bebind conventional drive test evo­
`
`
`
`
`
`lution drove further the need to understand pos­
`
`
`sible scenarios, in wbich tbe foreseen solutions
`
`
`would help to minimize the drive tests. The main
`
`
`
`triggers for drive test execution are comprised of
`[1, 5]:
`New base station deployment, where collec­
`
`
`
`
`tion of downlink/uplink (DL/UL) coverage mea­
`
`surements of the new cell a nd neighbor cells are
`
`
`
`essential for a 'coarse' tuning of the network.
`
`Construction of new highways/railways/major
`
`
`buildings, which are in fact new obstacles caus­
`
`
`
`ing additional shadowing in the existing radio
`network and new sources of network traffic.
`
`
`Drive tests are performed to check whether cov­
`
`
`erage or throughput requires improvement.
`
`
`Customer's complaint - when customers
`
`
`experience bad QoS and indicate these concerns,
`
`
`
`
`the operator perfonns measurements collection in
`
`
`the relevant area. This allows operators to identi­
`
`
`fy, understand and solve the problem, and pro­
`
`
`vide in effect high-quality service to the end user.
`Figure 1.
`
`
`
`Periodic drive tests - regular network moni­
`U-plane MDT architecture (left) and C-plane MDT architecture
`
`
`
`
`toring helps to reflect the actual performance of
`(right).
`
`"alive" net\vorks, with always changing due traf­
`
`
`fic conditions, and identify areas for improve­
`ment. This kind of drive tests is also performed
`MDT ARCHITECTURE
`on a regular basis to perform benchmarking
`INITIAL STUDIES ((-PLANE VS. U-PLANE)
`
`
`
`bet\veen operators.
`In the first phase of the study in 3GPP, the fol­
`
`
`The solutions developed in Rel-10 focus on
`
`
`lowing two architecture solutions were discussed
`
`the Coverage Optimization use case that will
`
`
`[5]: Control-plane (C-plane) based MDT archi­
`
`
`benefit operators especially in the early phase of
`
`
`tecture and User-plane (U-plane) based MDT
`
`
`net\vork deployment [6, 8]. The solutions enable
`
`
`
`architecture. Figure illustrates the two archi­
`
`collection of a set of MDT measurements that
`1
`
`
`
`will provide information for the operator to
`
`tectures. The C-plane based MDT architecture
`
`
`refers to an architecture where C-plane signaling
`
`design reliable coverage maps and consequently
`
`
`is used for sending MDT configuration to the
`
`
`to detect coverage issues. The objectives for
`
`
`UE and for reporting MDT measurements to
`
`
`measuring coverage are as follows:
`
`
`the network. In this architecture, the collected
`
`
`
`
`Coverage mapping: concerns the collection of
`
`
`MDT measurements are visible to the Radio
`
`MDT measurements in all parts of the network
`Access Network (RAN) node and Operation
`
`
`
`
`to provide an insight into the signal levels distri­
`
`bution per physical location and allow overall
`
`and Maintenance (OAM). On the other band,
`
`
`
`U-plane based MDT architecture utilizes a cer­
`
`coverage visualization
`
`
`
`tain application terminated directly bet\veen the
`
`
`Coverage hole and weak coverage detection:
`
`
`
`concerns areas where the downlink signal (of
`
`UE and the MDT server. The application data,
`
`
`which may include measurement results and
`
`
`
`
`both serving and neighbor cells) is below the
`
`
`their reporting configuration, policy setting,
`
`
`
`level needed to maintain either basic service or
`etc.,
`
`
`
`is transported using a U-plane bearer. One of
`
`
`
`to fulfill planned performance requirements
`
`t he foreseen applications was Open Mobile
`
`
`
`therefore causing discontinuous or poor service
`
`
`Alliance -Device Management (OMA-DM).
`to the end user
`
`
`
`Pilot pollution detection: concerns areas
`
`
`Since OMA-DM is terminated bet\veen the UE
`
`
`and OMA-DM server within the operator's net­
`
`
`where large overlap of different cells' coverage
`
`
`
`
`or unexpected signal propagation between cells
`work, the RAN node is unaware of the MDT
`
`
`measurements sent between the UE and OMA­
`
`
`cause excessive interference levels, high power
`DM server.
`
`
`levels, high energy consumption, and low cell
`perfonnance
`The conclusion of the study phase was that
`
`3GPP specification work is to be continued
`
`
`
`Overshoot coverage detection: concerns areas
`
`
`based on C-plane MDT architecture. TI1e main
`
`
`where coverage of a cell reaches far beyond
`
`
`reason was the visibility of the collected MDT
`
`what was initially planned
`
`
`measurements in the RAN node such that the
`U1>link coverage verification: concerns the
`
`
`
`
`
`MDT information can be used by the RAN itself
`
`detection of areas with poor uplink communica­
`
`
`
`to perform any automated network parameter
`tion and unbalanced coverage between the
`
`optimization. In fact the work on MDT in 3GPP
`
`uplink and downlink connections
`In all the cases above, t he MDT information
`
`
`was closely related to the work item for Self­
`
`
`
`should enable to detect overall network coverage
`
`
`
`Organizing Networks (SON) [4], to avoid any
`
`
`as well as reveal the locations where signal levels
`
`
`redundant features and to enable close inter­
`
`are the weakest and embed a risk for degrada­
`
`
`working between the two features.
`
`Nevertheless, 3GPP noted that the informa-
`tion of end user experience.
`
`IEEE Communications Magazine • June 2012
`
`29
`
`Authorized licensed use fim�ed to: West Virgnia University. Dow nloaded on January 26,2021 at 02:02 36 UTC from EEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
`
`IPR2022-00459
`Apple EX1008 Page 2
`
`

`

`The so/utiom
`
`de1eloped in Rel-1 a
`Signaling-based MDT
`
`focus on the
`
`OAM
`
`Coverage
`
`
`
`Optimization use
`
`case that w11/ benefit
`
`operators to design
`
`HSS
`
`Signaling-based MDT
`
`Management/
`area-based MDT
`
`reliable coverage
`Signaling-based MDT
`
`maps and
`
`consequently to
`
`detect coverage
`
`issues.
`
`�i�i;�; ogged MDT
`h, Immediate MDT
`
`� measurement report
`
`Immediate MDT
`
`measurement report
`Logged MDT
`measurement
`� -= �� _,_---"-- _ re7port
`L09 ayail�bility
`
`� ,..,,�,, w='""
`measurement
`L ed MDT
`mdicauo'l
`configuration
`m��urement
`it
`Logged data
`l•••••••I
`
`Connected state
`Figure 2.
`
`
`
`Overn/1 MDT architecture.
`
`Idle state
`
`
`
`Connected state
`
`From network s ignaling perspective, two
`
`
`tion elements defined for JI..IDT configuratio n
`
`
`
`types of MDT were defined [8]:
`
`
`and measurements i n the C-plane architecture
`
`by other protocols/specifications
`Signaling-based MDT is used to collect mea­
`
`
`can be utilized
`
`surements from a certain/specific UE. The so­
`
`outside 3GPP, e.g., OMA-DM.
`
`
`
`called "signaling-based trace" feature [8] is used
`REL-10 MDT ARCHITECTURE
`
`
`for managing signaling-based MDT.
`Management/area-based MDT is used to col­
`
`
`Figure 2 describes the overall MDT architecture
`
`
`lect measurements from randomly chosen UEs
`
`defined in 3GPP Rel-10 for LTE. The same
`
`or a group of UEs that enter a (certain) geo­
`
`architecture applies for both LTE and UMTS.
`
`graphical area. In management/area-based MDT
`, the terminolo
`Note tJ1at in the entire article
`gy
`Node B ( eNB),"
`
`
`
`the so-called "management-based trace" or "cell
`"RAN Dode" refers to ''Evolved
`
`i.e., base station in LTE, and "Radio Network
`
`trace" feature [8] is used to manage MDT.
`(RNC)," i .e ., radio resource
`
`
`From radio configuration perspective, two
`Controller
`coll­
`
`types of MDT were defined [6]:
`
`t railer node in UMTS. The terminology "Core
`
`
`Network (CN) node" refers to "Mobility Man­
`
`Logged M])T is a type of MDT where the UE
`agement Entity (MME)" in LTE and "Serving
`
`
`stores t he collected data for a certain period of
`
`General Packet Radio Service (SGSN)" or
`
`time before the data is reported to the network.
`
`
`"Mobile services Switching Center (MSC)" in
`
`
`
`
`This type of MDT is performed when the UE is
`
`in idle state (i.e., the UE has no setup connec­
`UMTS.
`tion with the RAN node).
`MDT is always triggered by the
`network i.e.,
`
`Immediate MDT is a type of MDT wbere the
`
`
`OAM decides the configuration of MDT param­
`
`eters that need to be performed by the UE and
`
`
`
`UE promptly reports the collected data to the
`
`
`network. This type of MDT is performed when
`
`sends these parameters to the RAN node for
`
`
`MDT activation. Upon reception of these MDT
`
`the UE is in active state (i.e., the UE has a setup
`
`connection witb tJ1e RAN node).
`, the RAN node acti­
`
`configuration parameters
`
`The standard allows any combinations
`
`vates the MDT fut1ctionality in the UE by send­
`
`
`ing the MDT configuration parameters to the
`
`
`between the above MDT types. For example, the
`
`management/area-based MDT can assign the
`
`UE. After the UE performs relevant measure­
`ments, the UE reports
`
`the measurement results
`
`
`UE to perform logged or immediate MDT, and
`
`the signaling-based MDT can be used also to
`to the RAN node, which will then send these
`
`
`assign the UE to perform logged or immediate
`
`results to an MDT server, known as Trace Col­
`Entity (TCE).
`lection
`MDT.
`
`
`) network signaling purposes
`For (inter-node
`,
`
`
`
`the existing Trace procedures (i.e., procedure for
`
`MDT CONFIGURATION FROM
`
`OAM to trace radio measurements in the RAN
`
`node defined in previous 3GPP Releases) were
`
`
`OAM TO RAN
`
`reused and extended for managing M DT mea­
`MDT
`surements
`and configuration [8]. For radio inter­
`
`SIGNALING-BASED
`
`
`Figure 3 illustrates an example scenario how
`
`
`
`
`face signaling purposes, specific procedures and
`
`MDT is activated to the UE in signaling-based
`
`
`
`information elements were defined to support
`MDT [8].
`
`IvlDT configuration and reporting.
`
`30
`
`
`
`
`IEEE Communications Magazine • June 2012
`
`
`Authorized licensed use fim�ed to: West Virgnia University. Downloaded on January 26,2021 at 02:02 36 UTC from EEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
`
`
`
`IPR2022-00459
`Apple EX1008 Page 3
`
`

`

`UE
`
`RAN node
`
`CN node
`
`HSS
`
`OAM
`
`Idle state
`
`MDT activation
`
`(MDT configuration param ters)
`
`
`
`Storing MDT parameters
`
`User consent checking
`
`MDT confi uration a ameters
`
`
`
`Storing MDT parameters
`
`Call setup
`
`Active state
`
`
`
`MDT configuration pa ameters
`
`
`
`Storing MDT parameters
`
`
`
`M measurement confi uration
`
`
`Figure 3.
`
`Signaling-based MDT activation procedure.
`
`The MDT configura­
`
`tion parameters are
`
`sent from the OAM
`
`direct/,; to the R/lN
`
`node, and the RAN
`
`node stores these
`
`parameters for later
`
`configuration
`
`towards UEs. This
`
`type of MDT is acti-
`
`vated typically in
`
`R/lN nodes of a spe­
`
`
`
`cific area, where the
`
`area is identified by a
`
`list of cells or paging
`
`location area
`
`id€f1tities.
`
`ticipate in MDT. Roaming users and not-con­
`
`
`
`In signaling-based MDT, UE selection is
`
`sented users are excluded from any MDT cam­
`
`performed in the DAM based on a permanent
`paign.
`
`
`UE identity, which uniquely identifies the UE
`
`
`in the network, s uch as International Mobile
`
`
`
`Subscriber Identity (IMSI) or International
`MDT CONFIGURATION FROM
`
`
`
`Mobile Equipment Identity and Software Ver­
`sion (IMEI SV). From OAM the MDT configu­
`RAN TO UE
`ration parameters are sent to the H ome
`LOGGED MDT
`
`
`
`Subscriber Service (HSS), where decision is
`
`
`
`
`taken whether MDT can be activated for a UE, In logged MDT, measurements are configured
`
`
`
`
`
`
`based on whether the corresponding end user t o the UE "in advance," i.e., tbe received MDT
`
`
`
`
`
`has consented to contribute to MDT. The HSS configuration is stored in the UE and becomes
`
`
`
`performs MDT activation towards the relevant
`
`only valid when the UE releases the connection
`
`CN node e.g., MME in case of LTE. This acti­
`
`
`and enters idle state [6]. The logging operation
`
`
`
`
`
`
`vation is typically done when the UE initially itself is therefore performed by the UE in idle
`
`state. For tbe UE to log MDT measurements,
`
`
`
`attaches to the network or updates its paging
`
`l ocation area, but the MDT configurat ion the UE must be able to detect,
`
`
`track, and mea­
`
`
`parameters can be propagated also as a stan­
`
`
`
`sure radio signals from base stations, i.e., the sig­
`nal level has t o be abov e the UE receiver
`
`dalone procedure at any time. This activation
`
`
`
`
`of MDT from CN to RAN is performed when a sensitivity. Once the signal level from all cells
`
`has dropped below the minimum level for camp­
`
`call or session is established.
`
`
`
`ing, the UE encounters a "coverage hole." To
`MANAGEMENT/AREA-BASED MDT
`
`
`sav e the amount of data, tbe UE performs no
`
`
`The procedure used for activating MDT in man­
`
`logging while in a coverage hole. The UE sensi­
`
`
`
`tivity would be inferior compared to specialized
`
`
`agement/area-based MDT is shown in Fig. 4 [8].
`
`
`
`
`
`The MDT configuration parameters are sent equipment in conventional drive tests, as s uch
`
`
`equipment is normally designed to have higher
`
`from the OAM directly to the RAN node, and
`
`
`
`
`
`
`the RAN node stores these parameters for later sensitivity and accuracy in measuriDg low level
`
`
`configuration towards UEs. This type of MDT is
`
`
`signals. However, in MDT the UE has the ability
`
`
`
`
`
`
`activated typically in RAN nodes of a specific to log measurements for a period of 10 s in LTE
`(or 12 s in UMTS) from the time the UE enters
`
`area, where the area is identified by a list of cells
`
`a coverage hole.
`
`
`or paging location area identities.
`By statistically analyzing these measurement
`
`
`
`
`One of the differences between signaling­
`logs, an operat or can detect nearly where the
`
`
`based MDT and management/area-based MDT
`
`
`coverage hole is. Such information would also
`
`
`is how the UE selection is performed. In man­
`
`
`provide a hint how to improve coverage, e.g.,
`
`agement/area-based MDT, selection of UEs to
`
`which base stations need parameter adjustments
`commit to MDT is done by the RAN node,
`
`and which base stations would become neighbors
`
`
`based on the received parameters from DAM,
`
`if a new base station is placed on the dark spot.
`
`UE radio capability, and the "MDT allowed
`
`
`If the operator has other carrier frequencies or
`flag" received from the CN node during call
`
`systems that cover the area, handover thresholds
`setup. This flag is set by the CN node based
`
`
`can be adjusted such that inter-frequency or
`
`
`on the UE's roaming status and whether the
`
`
`inter-system handover can be triggered before
`
`
`corresponding end user bas consented to par-
`
`IEEE Communications Magazine • June 2012
`
`31
`
`Authorized licensed use fim�ed to: West Virgnia University. Dow nloaded on January 26,2021 at 02:02 36 UTC from EEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
`
`IPR2022-00459
`Apple EX1008 Page 4
`
`

`

`The RAN node is not
`
`required to retrieve
`
`UE
`
`RAN node
`
`CN node
`
`HSS
`
`OAM
`
`the logged data
`
`Active state
`directr; after the log
`
`availability is received
`
`MDT activation
`
`(MD configuration parame ers)
`
`from the UE. The
`
`RAN node can initi­
`
`ate data retrieval
`at
`
`
`
`any time while the
`
`UE is connected.
`
`Hence, the UE is
`
`required to keep the
`
`non-retrieved report
`
`
`
`Storing MDT parameters
`
`Call setup
`
`Context setup
`
`uration parameters, M T allowed bit)
`
`UE selection
`
`for 48 hours from
`
`the moment the log­
`
`
`
`M measurement conf guration
`
`ging duration timer
`Management/area-based MDT activation procedure.
`Figure 4.
`
`expires.
`
`ration (i.e., one MDT context) at a time.
`
`
`the UE enters the coverage hole. The logged
`
`
`
`Thus, if other RAT or PLMN provides a new
`
`
`measurements would allow the operator t o
`
`logged MDT configuration to the UE, the
`
`decide which base stations need such parameter
`
`
`UE overwrites the previously received con­
`tuning.
`figuration.
`
`
`The overall principle of logged MDT opera­
`The UE reports the logged data upon
`
`
`
`tion is illustrated in Fig. 5. The measurement
`
`r equest from the network. The RAN node
`
`configuration for logged MDT sent from the
`
`
`requests reporting based on indication from
`RAN node to the UE is created based on the
`
`
`the UE, upon connection establishment, of
`
`
`
`MDT configuration parameters received from
`
`
`OAM [7, 8]. The followings are the configura­
`
`the availability of logged data. The RAN node
`is not require d t o retrieve the logged data
`tion parameters:
`
`
`directly after the log availability is received
`
`
`• Logging interval which defines the periodic­
`
`ity of the measurements that should be
`
`from the UE. The RAN node can initiate data
`logged
`
`retrieval at any time while the UE is connect­
`•Logging rlnration which determines how
`
`
`
`ed. Hence, the UE is required to keep the
`
`non-retrieved report f or 48 hours from the
`
`long the logged MDT configuration is valid
`
`moment the logging duration timer expires.
`
`
`• Trace Reference which identifies the Trace
`
`
`The 48-hour timer can also be started when
`
`Session used for the MDT
`
`the logged data volume exceeds the available
`•Trace Recording Session Reference which is
`
`
`
`
`storage space in the UE reserved f or MDT
`
`
`used together with the Trace Reference for
`
`
`purposes. AUE supporting R el-10 MDT is
`
`
`correlating the collected log data of an
`
`equipped with a minimum of 64 kB memory
`
`MDT session and the UE
`for log storage.
`• TCE ID identifi e s the TCE to where the
`
`MDT measurements should be sent. This
`With this reporting mechanism, the amount
`
`
`
`
`
`of signaling is reduced compared to immediate
`
`parameter is sent back by the UE within
`
`MDT, as the UE reports all logs in one report.
`
`the log data to the network.
`
`
`
`However, logged MDT requires additional mem­
`
`
`The measureme11t results are tagged with
`
`
`
`ory for log storage and specific procedures for
`
`
`
`available location information, i.e., location
`log r eporting.
`
`i nformation that happened to have been
`acquired by the UE at the time of measure­
`ment.
`IMMEDIATE MDT
`The UE stores the received co11figuration
`Immediate MDT utilizes procedures defined for
`
`
`
`
`
`regardless of a state change (idle to active
`
`RRM in previous 3GPP Releases to a great
`
`extent. The RAN node translates the MDT con­
`
`and vice versa) within the logging duration
`
`
`figuration parameters received from the
`timer. This applies also f or a change of
`
`OAM/CN node into RRM measurement config­
`
`
`camped operator network, i .e., Public Land
`
`
`uration before sending to the UE [7, 8]. The
`Mobile Network (PLMN) and RAT (i.e.,
`
`main change introduced for immediate MDT
`
`LTE and UMTS). In case of PLMN, RAT or
`
`
`state change, the logging by the UE is sus­
`
`
`was the configuration and reporting of location
`
`
`information. The followings are the configura­
`
`
`
`pended. Effectively, logged MDT will resume
`tion parameters:
`when the UE returns to idle state or comes
`
`•List of measurements which identifies what
`
`back to the RAT that configured MDT. The
`
`measurements the UE should collect
`
`UE maintains only one logged MDT configu-
`
`32
`IEEE Communications Magazine • June 2012
`
`
`Authorized licensed use fim�ed to: West Virgnia University. Dow nloaded on January 26,2021 at 02:02 36 UTC from EEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
`
`IPR2022-00459
`Apple EX1008 Page 5
`
`

`

`•Report interval which defines the interval of
`
`UE
`
`RAN node
`
`Active state
`
`
`Logged MDT measurement configuration
`
`
`
`Log availability indication
`
`
`
`Logged measurement request
`
`
`
`Logged measurement report
`
`•Reporting Trigger which determines
`
`
`
`whether periodical or event based reporting
`is requested
`
`
`
`
`periodical measurements
`
`•Report amount which indicates the number
`
`
`of measurement reports to be sent with
`
`periodical measurements
`
`•Event threshold indicates the threshold
`
`
`(against s ignal quality) for event based
`reporting
`•Area scope if present in
`
`management/area-based MDT, this indi­
`cates to the RAN node in which cells MDT
`
`
`should be activated; if present in signaling­
`
`based MDT, this indicates that the mea­
`
`
`
`surement c onfiguration is sent to the
`
`
`selected UE only if it is connected in the
`cell which is part of the area scope.
`Unlike logged MDT, the TCE ID, Trace Ref­
`
`
`erence and Trace Recording Session Reference
`
`parameters are not sent to the UE, since those
`
`
`are already known by the network and the UE
`
`
`bas continuous connection with the network.
`
`
`Once the UE receives the configuration, the
`
`
`
`UE applies it immediately and starts sending
`
`
`measurement reports when the reporting condi­
`Figure 5. Logged MDT configuration and reporting.
`
`tions are met. Based on the conventional mea­
`
`
`surement capabilities for RRM, two reporting
`trigg ers have been identified
`for MDT purposes:
`Event A2 (i.e., the quality of serving cell
`LOCATION INFORMATION FOR
`MDT
`
`becomes less than a threshold) and periodical
`PRINCIPLES OF
`
`
`
`reporting. The overall principle of immediate
`
`
`MDT operation in RAN is illustrated in Fig. 6.
`
`LOCATION INFORMATION IN MDT
`
`With immediate MDT the UE may also send
`Inclusion of location information in MDT
`
`
`
`
`
`separate reports on connection failures (e.g.,
`
`
`radio link failures or handover failures). Sucb
`
`
`
`reports is essential in MDT. Location informa­
`
`
`
`Radio Link Failure (RLF) reporting requires no
`
`tion for MDT can be categorized into the fol­
`lowings:
`
`
`prior configuration. That is, a UE supporting the
`Detailed location information is geographical
`
`
`
`
`
`
`feature autonomously collects data related to the
`
`
`
`location information which at least consists of
`
`failure and sends them to the network upon
`
`latitude and longitude. This t ype of location
`
`
`
`request after recovery. The data consist of radio
`
`
`information gives the exact geographical point of
`
`
`
`measurement results available at the time of
`
`
`connection failure, tagged by available location
`
`the earth where the radio measurement sample
`
`was taken (subject to the positioning method
`
`
`information and identification of cells involved
`
`
`
`
`accuracy). Detailed location information is typi­
`
`in the event. Reporting is performed in a similar
`
`cally obtained by GPS or Global Navigation
`
`
`way to logged MDT, i.e., the UE indicates first
`
`
`the availability of an RLF report after successful
`
`
`
`Satellite System (GNSS) positioning method, but
`
`connection recovery, upon which the RLF report
`
`
`can also be obtained by other positioning meth­
`
`can be retrieved by the RAN node.
`
`
`ods supported by the UE and the network, e.g.,
`
`
`Observed Time Difference of Arrival (OTDOA),
`
`
`
`Assisted -GNSS (Assisted-GPS), Enhanced Cell
`
`
`ID (E-CID) or even Secure User-Plane Location
`(SUPL).
`In general, MDT does not introduce additional
`
`
`RF fingerprint refers to t he profile of mea­
`
`
`
`
`sured quality of signals from the neighboring
`requirements for UE measurements handling
`
`cells. This information can be used by the net­
`
`
`during handover. In signaling-based MDT, since
`
`
`
`the purpose is to collect measurements from a
`
`
`
`work to calculate the approximate location of
`
`the UE by means of e.g., triangulation of the
`
`
`particular UE, the MDT configuration and
`
`
`geographical location of the cell or the base sta­
`
`
`reporting are continued during and after han­
`tion.
`
`
`dover. MDT configuration is transferred from
`In Rel-10 MDT, inclusion of detailed location
`
`
`
`the handover source RAN node to the target
`
`
`
`information is based on 'best effort', i.e., includ­
`
`RAN node, as the target RAN node also needs
`
`to be aware of what measurements are b eing
`
`ed only if it happens to be available in the UE at
`
`the time wben the UE performs radio measure­
`
`
`continued in the UE, so that any further recon­
`
`
`ments. Its availability depends on the ongoing
`
`
`
`figurations can be performed as necessary. In
`
`
`
`location services, e.g., map application and loca­
`contrast in management/area-based MDT,
`
`tion search application, which are independent
`
`
`
`since the purpose is to collect measurements in a
`from MDT control.
`
`
`certain area, the configuration and measure­
`
`The main benefit of this best effort approach
`
`
`ments do not continue upon handover.
`
`HANDLING OF
`
`MDT CONFIGURATION UPON HANDOVER
`
`IEEE Communications Magazine • June 2012
`
`33
`
`
`
`Authorized licensed use fim�ed to: West Virgnia University. Dow nloaded on January 26.2021 at 02:02 36 UTC from EEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
`
`
`
`IPR2022-00459
`Apple EX1008 Page 6
`
`

`

`UE
`
`RAN node
`
`measurements. Since there is no 'interval'
`
`
`defined for this kind of triggers, u alike logged
`
`
`MDT, the reporting interval cannot be used as
`
`
`
`guidance for assessing the validity of detailed
`
`
`
`location information. To address this problem,
`
`
`the GPS timestamp (if available) can also be
`
`
`
`reported as part of location information. With
`
`
`the assumption that the network is also aware of
`Active state
`
`
`the GPS timing, the network can judge the valid­
`Immediate MDT measurement configuration
`
`
`
`ity by comparing the GPS timestamp from the
`
`(using RRM procedure)
`
`
`UE to the GPS timestamp maintained in the
`
`
`
`network. The same mechanism also applies to
`Immediate MDT measurement configuration
`
`
`
`
`acknowledgement (using RRM procedure)
`
`periodical reporting.
`
`Reporting trigger (event/
`
`
`
`report interval) met
`
`
`
`Measurement report
`
`Figure 6. Immediate MDT configuration. and reporting.
`
`SECURITY ASPECT OF MDT
`
`
`
`Security aspects of MDT can be classified into
`
`
`
`the u ser perspective and the operator network
`perspective.
`From the user perspective, a user might not
`
`
`
`want his/her handset to be used for MDT pur­
`
`
`
`poses due to various reasons, e.g., not willing to
`
`
`
`reveal its location. The MDT mechanism speci­
`
`
`fied in 3GPP provides the following security pro­
`tection towards the user: user data
`
`
`confide11tiality, user data anonymity a11d privacy,
`is limited UE impact. No additional battery con­
`
`
`
`
`
`
`sumption nor additional processing is incurred,
`
`and co11sent-based MDT activation.
`since the UE does not need to start any posi­
`
`
`Confidentiality of user data is achieved by
`
`
`tioning function to obtain its detailed location
`
`
`
`sending the MDT related signaling using integri­
`
`
`when an MDT measurement is taken. The speci­
`
`
`ty protected protocols, both in radio interface
`
`
`
`fications were intentionally defined as sucb to
`
`
`
`and network interface. Data anonymity and pri­
`
`lower the hurdle for implementing MDT fea­
`
`
`vacy is achieved by assuring that the collected
`
`tures in the UE, as MDT is more useful in the
`
`data cannot be linked to a real user identity, e.g.,
`
`IMSI. Thus, the CN node is forbidden to send
`
`
`
`initial phases of network deployment and the
`
`
`number of participating UEs is essential to
`
`
`any user identity, e.g., IMSI, to the TCE.
`
`
`achieve reliability. However, this has created
`To address the user consent requirement, a
`
`
`
`some disadvantages for MDT as a system, since
`
`
`
`mechanism is adopted to ascertain that the oper­
`
`not every MDT measurement sample is associat­
`
`ator can only utilize the UE of those users who
`
`
`
`ed with detailed location information, and not
`
`
`have given tbei.r consent. This consent for MDT
`
`
`
`all location infonnation associated to MDT sam­
`
`can be part of user subscription and can be
`
`ples are accurate enough to point the exact loca­
`
`revoked anytime by the user. For signaling-based
`tion where the sample was taken.
`
`MDT, the HSS makes sure that MDT activation
`
`signaling is sent to the RAN node, only if the
`
`
`In this approach, validity of the location
`
`
`information becomes an important factor. To
`
`
`user data in HSS indicates that the user bas
`
`
`
`decide whether the obtained location informa­
`
`
`
`already given his/her consent to the operator to
`
`
`
`
`perform MDT using his/her UE. For manage­
`
`
`tion is valid for reliable use, a network operator
`
`
`needs to carefully consider the time difference
`ment/area-based MDT, the RAN node decides
`
`between when tbe location information was
`
`
`
`whether configuration of MDT is allowed for a
`
`
`obtained and when the radio measurement was
`
`UE, based on the "MDT allowed flag" reflecting
`obtained.
`
`
`the user conse11t status as explained in 4.2.
`
`
`From the operator perspective, the network
`LOCATION INFORMATION FOR LOGGED MDT
`
`
`
`
`quality information can be sensitive information.
`
`For logged MDT, sta

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket