`
`(19) World Intellectual Property Organization
`International Bureau
`
`(43) International Publication Date
`5 May 2011 (05.05.2011)
`
`PCT
`
`(51) International Patent Classification:
`A61N 1/00 (2006.01)
`
`(21) International Application Number:
`PCT/US20 10/054 167
`
`(22) International Filing Date:
`
`(25) Filing Language:
`
`(26) Publication Language:
`
`26 October 2010 (26.10.2010)
`
`English
`
`English
`
`(30) Priority Data:
`61/279,883
`
`26 October 2009 (26.10.2009)
`
`US
`
`(71) Applicant (for all designated States except US): EMKI-
`NETICS, INC. [US/US]; 49 Westdale Drive, Santa Cruz,
`California 95060 (US).
`
`(10) International Publication Number
`WO 2011/053607 Al
`
`AO, AT, AU, AZ, BA, BB, BG, BH, BR, BW, BY, BZ,
`CA, CH, CL, CN, CO, CR, CU, CZ, DE, DK, DM, DO,
`DZ, EC, EE, EG, ES, FI, GB, GD, GE, GH, GM, GT,
`HN, HR, HU, ID, IL, IN, IS, JP, KE, KG, KM, KN, KP,
`KR, KZ, LA, LC, LK, LR, LS, LT, LU, LY, MA, MD,
`ME, MG, MK, MN, MW, MX, MY, MZ, NA, NG, NI,
`NO, NZ, OM, PE, PG, PH, PL, PT, RO, RS, RU, SC, SD,
`SE, SG, SK, SL, SM, ST, SV, SY, TH, TJ, TM, TN, TR,
`TT, TZ, UA, UG, US, UZ, VC, VN, ZA, ZM, ZW.
`
`(84) Designated States (unless otherwise indicated, for every
`kind of regional protection available): ARIPO (BW, GH,
`GM, KE, LR, LS, MW, MZ, NA, SD, SL, SZ, TZ, UG,
`ZM, ZW), Eurasian (AM, AZ, BY, KG, KZ, MD, RU, TJ,
`TM), European (AL, AT, BE, BG, CH, CY, CZ, DE, DK,
`EE, ES, FI, FR, GB, GR, HR, HU, IE, IS, GG
`, LT, LU,
`LV, MC, MK, MT, NL, NO, PL, PT, RO, RS, SE, SI, SK,
`SM, TR), OAPI (BF, BJ, CF, CG, CI, CM, GA, GN, GQ,
`GW, ML, MR, NE, SN, TD, TG).
`
`(72) Inventor; and
`(for US only): BURNETT, Daniel
`(75) Inventor/Applicant
`Rogers [US/US]; 588 Teresita Boulevard, San Francisco, Declarations under Rule 4.17 :
`California 94127 (US).
`— as to applicant's entitlement to apply for and be granted
`a patent (Rule 4.1 7(H))
`(74) Agents: GIOVANNETTI, Steven M. et al; Levine
`Bagade Han LLP, 2400 Geng Rd, Suite 120, Palo Alto, Published:
`California 94303 (US).
`— with international search report (Art. 21(3))
`
`(81) Designated States (unless otherwise indicated, for every
`kind of national protection available): AE, AG, AL, AM,
`
`(54) Title: METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR ELECTROMAGNETIC STIMULATION OF NERVE, MUSCLE, AND BODY
`TISSUES
`
`(57) Abstract: In certain variations,
`systems
`and/or methods for electromagnetic induction
`therapy are provided. One or more ergonomic
`or body contoured applicators may be included.
`The applicators include one or more conductive
`coils configured to generate an electromagnetic
`or magnetic field focused on a target nerve,
`muscle or other body tissues positioned in
`proximity to the coil. One or more sensors may
`be utilized to detect stimulation and to provide
`feedback about the efficacy of the applied elec
`induction therapy. A controller
`tromagnetic
`may be adjustable to vary a current through a
`coil to adjust the magnetic field focused upon
`the target nerve, muscle or other body tissues
`based on the feedback provide by a sensor or
`by a patient.
`In certain systems or methods,
`pulsed magnetic fields may be intermittently
`applied to a target nerve, muscle or tissue with
`out causing habituation.
`
`o
`
`LUMENIS EX1082
`Page 1
`
`
`
`METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR ELECTROMAGNETIC STIMULATION OF
`
`NERVE, MUSCLE, AND BODY TISSUES
`
`CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS
`
`[0001]
`
`The present application claims benefit of priority to U.S. Provisional Patent
`
`Application Serial No. 61/279,883 filed October 26, 2009 which is incorporated by
`
`reference herein in its entirety for all purposes. The following applications are also
`
`incorporated herein by reference in their entirety for all purposes: U.S. Patent Application
`
`Serial No. 12/508,529 filed July 23, 2009, which is a continuation in part of U.S. Patent
`
`Application Serial No. 11/866,329 filed October 2, 2007, which claims priority to U.S.
`
`Provisional Patent Application Serial No. 60/848,720 filed October 2, 2006; U.S. Patent
`
`Application Serial No. 12/695,087 filed January 27, 2010, which is a continuation of U.S.
`
`Patent Application Serial No. 11/332,797 filed January 17, 2006; U.S. Patent Application
`
`Serial Nos. 12/509,362 filed July 24, 2009; 12/469,365 filed May 20, 2009 which is a
`
`continuation of U.S. Patent Application Serial No.
`
`1/866,329 filed October 2, 2007 which
`
`claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application Serial No. 60/848,720 filed October 2,
`
`2006, and 12/469,625 filed May 20, 2009 which is a continuation of U.S. Patent Application
`
`Serial No. 11/866,329 filed October 2, 2007 which claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent
`
`Application Serial No. 60/848,720 filed October 2, 2006; and 12/509,304 filed July 24, 2009
`
`which is a continuation of U.S. Patent Application Serial No. 12/508,529 filed July 23, 2009
`
`which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. Patent Application Serial No. 11/866,329 filed
`
`October 2, 2007 which claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application Serial No.
`
`60/848,720 filed October 2, 2006; and 12/509,345 filed July 24, 2009 which is a
`
`continuation of U.S. Patent Application Serial No. 12/508,529 filed July 23, 2009 which is a
`
`continuation-in-part of U.S. Patent Application Serial No.
`
`1/866,329 filed October 2, 2007
`
`which claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application Serial No. 60/848,720 filed
`
`October 2, 2006.
`
`BACKGROUND
`
`[0002]
`
`The concept of pulsed electromagnetic stimulation (PES) was first observed
`
`by the renowned scientist Michael Faraday in 1831 . Faraday was able to demonstrate that
`
`LUMENIS EX1082
`Page 2
`
`
`
`time varying, or pulsed electromagnetic fields have the potential to induce current in a
`
`conductive object. Faraday's experimental setup was simple. He found that by passing
`
`strong electric current through a coil of wire he was able to produce pulsed electromagnetic
`
`stimuli. This pulsed electromagnetic stimulus was able to induce the flow of current in a
`
`nearby electrically conductive body.
`
`[0003]
`
`In the years since the discoveries of Faraday, pulsed electromagnetic
`
`stimulators have found application in countless areas of scientific investigation.
`
`In 1965, the
`
`scientists Bickford and Freming demonstrated the use of electromagnetic stimulation to
`
`induce conduction within nerves of the face. Later, in
`
`82 Poison et al., U . S . Patent No.
`
`5,766,124 produced a device capable of stimulating peripheral nerves of the body. This
`
`device was able to stimulate peripheral nerves of the body sufficiently to cause muscle
`
`activity, recording the first evoked potentials from electromagnetic stimulation.
`
`[0004]
`
`One of the earliest practical applications of electromagnetic stimulating
`
`technology took the form of a bone growth stimulator - a device that employed low
`
`frequency pulsed electromagnetic fields (PEMF) to stimulate bone repair. They first found
`
`use approximately 20 years ago in the treatment of non healing fractures, and are slowly
`
`becoming the standard of care for this condition.
`
`[0005]
`
`As investigators have studied the effects of electromagnetic fields on fracture
`
`healing, it has been demonstrated that PEMFs can not only facilitate fracture healing but
`
`also promote numerous other positive effects on the human body, including: ( 1) causing
`
`muscles to contract, (2) altering nerve signal transmission to decrease experienced pain, and
`
`(3) causing new cell growth in cartilage. These powerful effects of pulsed electromagnetic
`
`stimulation have been well established in laboratory studies of animal models and also in
`
`multiple large, double blind, placebo controlled studies of human subjects published in the
`
`medical literature.
`
`[0006]
`
`Erickson's U.S. Patent 5,181,902, 1/26/1993, which describes a device using
`
`a double transducer system with contoured, flat wound transducers intended to generate
`
`therapeutic flux-aided electromagnetic fields in the body. The device is suggested to be
`
`conformed to the contour of the patient's back and incorporates an adjustable belt into the
`
`design. This system, as it is described, is disadvantageous in at least two respects. First, the
`
`flat, wound nature of the coil in this device is limited in its delivery of pulsed
`
`LUMENIS EX1082
`Page 3
`
`
`
`electromagnetic fields to deep tissues of the body. Second, the rigid nature of this device,
`
`intended to provide bracing for patients recovering from spinal fusion surgeries, may prove
`
`uncomfortable to some patients, especially in delivering therapy to regions of the body other
`
`than the back, such as the knee, elbow, hand, or other joints and tissues.
`
`[0007]
`
`U . S . Patent 6,086,525, which discloses a device that has a single coil in the
`
`shape of a "C" where the intensity of the electromagnetic field is between the ends of the
`
`"C". That point must be employed directly over the target nerve or muscle to be stimulated.
`
`The coil is toroidal in configuration and utilizes a unique core of vanadium permendur in the
`
`preferred form. One of the disadvantages of this device is that it requires a trained
`
`technician to treat the patient and to properly hand hold the open end of the "C" over the
`
`targeted nerve or muscle to be stimulated. The device is not portable and is designed for use
`
`in hospitals or similar institutions. Also the vanadium permendur core is required to
`
`increase the strength of the electromagnetic field to be strong enough to be effectively used.
`
`The design, shape and configuration described in Davey and other prior art devices, require
`
`the electromagnetic stimulator to be hand operated during use.
`
`[0008]
`
`Tepper in U.S. Patent 5,314,401, 5/24/1994 describes a pulsed
`
`electromagnetic field transducer that is intended to be conformable to the contour of a
`
`patients body. The PEMF transducer in this application is described as having a desired
`
`form and sufficient rigidity to maintain an anatomical contour. This system is
`
`disadvantageous in a number of respects. First, the desired contouring of this device will
`
`require that a significant number of different sizes be manufactured to accommodate the
`
`contours of an endless variety of body shapes. Second, the intended device does not
`
`incorporate markings to ensure that the device is placed in a correct alignment over the
`
`targeted area of the body. Finally, this proposed device utilizes flat, wound coils, providing
`
`PEMFs that do not penetrate as deeply or as uniformly into body tissues as those fields
`
`produced by solenoid coils.
`
`[0009]
`
`In U.S. Patent 6,179,770 Bl, 1/30/2001, Mould describes dual coil
`
`assemblies in a magnetic stimulator for neuro-muscular tissue, with cooling provided for the
`
`transducer coil. This device is intended to be held by a trained user over the targeted regions
`
`of the body in order to deliver PEMF therapy. The design of this device is limited by the
`
`LUMENIS EX1082
`Page 4
`
`
`
`difficult nature of manipulating a single coil and the cost-intensive requirement of using
`
`highly skilled medical personnel for operation.
`
`[0010]
`
`Parker in U.S. Patent 6, 155,966, 12/5/2000 describes a wearable article with
`
`a permanent magnet/electromagnet combination device to be used for toning tissue with
`
`focused, coherent EMF. This device is disadvantageous in several respects. First, this
`
`device is intended to be a hand-held application, with the user applying the device to
`
`targeted areas of the body. The hand-held nature of this application creates an inherently
`
`inconsistent and non-uniform method for delivery, especially difficult with the intention of
`
`the device to provide a focused electromagnetic stimulus. Second, the device combines a
`
`static magnet with the electromagnet assembly in an attempt to create a unipolar, negative
`
`polarity field. This form of electromagnetic field stimulation has not been demonstrated to
`
`be effective in the treatment of osteoarthritis, musculoskeletal pain, or atrophy treatment.
`
`[0011]
`
`March's U.S. Patent 6,200,259 Bl, 3/13/2001 describes a device with
`
`electromagnetic field coils applied front and back to a patient for treating cardiovascular
`
`disease by angiogenesis. An EMF dosage plan contemplates, multiple coil implants and
`
`pulse variables including carrier frequency, pulse shape, duty cycle, and total time exposed.
`
`This device describes the placement of coils around the regions of tissues in which
`
`collateralization of blood flow (or angiogenesis) is desired. The design contemplates
`
`applications including the use of coils embedded in a cloth wrap, which could be worn as a
`
`garment surrounding the body area of interest. Alternatively, an applicator with embedded
`
`coils to be placed around an arm or a leg to deliver the desired field is described. The use of
`
`PEMF in this application for the purpose of modulation of angiogenesis shows significant
`
`promise. The description of this device, however, does not suggest any extension of the
`
`electromagnetic phenomenon in circumstances where PEMF stimulation can provide
`
`dramatic opportunities for the treatment of osteoarthritis, and musculoskeletal pains
`
`including tendonitis, bursitis, and muscle spasms. Furthermore, this device is
`
`disadvantageous in the fact that it does not provide for the use of solenoid-type coils for the
`
`delivery of PEMF.
`
`[0012]
`
`Poison's U.S. Patent 5,766,124, 6/16/1998 describes a magnetic stimulator
`
`of neuro-muscular tissue. A reserve capacitor providing more efficiency in the control
`
`circuitry is devised. The description of the device, however, describes the stimulating coil in
`
`LUMENIS EX1082
`Page 5
`
`
`
`broad, generic terms, and does not contemplate application of the coil in any type of body
`
`applicator or other specific method for delivering PEMF to targeted areas of the body. As a
`
`result, this device is disadvantageous, in the respect that is does not provide for any method
`
`or delivery system to provide consistent, uniform PEMF stimulation.
`
`[0013]
`
`Schweighofer's U.S. Patent 6,123,658, 9/26/2000 describes a magnetic
`
`stimulation device which consists of a stimulation coil, a high-voltage capacitor, and a
`
`controllable network part. This device is intended to differentiate itself from low-voltage,
`
`low current devices by using a specific high-voltage, high current design to deliver PEMF
`
`for the purpose of triggering action potentials in deep neuromuscular tissue. This coil in this
`
`device is described as having a difficult and expensive to use hand-held configuration.
`
`[0014]
`
`Lin in U.S. Patent 5,857,957, issued Jan. 12, 1999 teaches the use of
`
`functional magnetic stimulation for the purpose of inducing a cough function in a
`
`mammalian subject. The description of the device provides for the use of hand-held
`
`stimulation coil, intended to be placed over the anterior chest of the subject for the purpose
`
`of stimulating nerves to induce a cough. This system is disadvantageous in the requirement
`
`of hand-held delivery which is difficult and inconsistent. The description contemplates use
`
`of the device in the induction of cough, and does not contemplate extension of the use of the
`
`device into other areas of neuromuscular stimulation.
`
`[0015]
`
`Tepper in U.S. Patent No. 6,024,691 , issued 2/1 5/2000 describes a cervical
`
`collar with integral transducer for PEMF treatment. The description of this device provides
`
`for the use of a single coil transducer, formed into the shape of a cervical collar. This
`
`system is disadvantageous in several respects. First, this device does not provide for the use
`
`of solenoid-type coils in the delivery of PEMF, which can provide a uniform and consistent
`
`signal. Second, the semi-rigid design of the collar complicates the delivery of PEMF to
`
`persons of differing body sizes. That is, for a person with a larger than average (or smaller
`
`than average) size neck, the design and semi-rigid nature of the device would make an
`
`exacting fit difficult, thereby diminishing the effectiveness of any delivered therapy.
`
`Furthermore, this device is designed to immobilize the neck and is therefore not applicable
`
`to most patients. Lastly, the device must be lowered over the head making application
`
`difficult.
`
`LUMENIS EX1082
`Page 6
`
`
`
`[0016]
`
`Erickson in U.S. Patent No. 5,401,233, issued 3/28/1995 describes a neck
`
`collar device for the delivery of PEMF therapy. The description of this device provides for
`
`the use of semi-rigid transducers, intended to be conformable to a selected anatomical
`
`contour. This device in disadvantageous in respects similar to those of Pollack 5,401,233, in
`
`that the device does not provide for the use of solenoid-type coils. Furthermore, this device
`
`is intended to provide bracing (as might be necessary for the treatment of fractures or after
`
`surgery). As a result, the rigidity of the device necessary to serve the bracing function
`
`makes the device less comfortable to wear, especially for a person who would not require
`
`bracing (such as in the treatment of arthritis, muscle spasm, or other forms of
`
`musculoskeletal pain).
`
`[0017]
`
`olt in U.S. Patent No. 5,518,495, issued 5/21/1996 describes a coil wound
`
`on a large bobbin that permits the insertion of an arm or a leg into the field of the coil for
`
`PEMF type therapy. This device is disadvantageous in several respects. First, the described
`
`use of a bobbin, around which the wire for the stimulating coil is wound provides for the
`
`treatment of certain areas of the body, but is certainly limited in its ability to deliver therapy
`
`to areas of the body such as the hips, shoulder, back, neck, etc. That is, the constraints of
`
`our human anatomy make it nearly impossible to approximate a metal bobbin, and thus the
`
`stimulating coil, to regions of the body such as the ball and socket joints of the hip or
`
`shoulder, where the round metal bobbin would strike the torso before it allowed the
`
`stimulating coils to adequately blanket with therapy the arm and/or joint in the hip and
`
`shoulder. Similarly, the use of a metal bobbin for the delivery of PEMF stimulation to the
`
`back would necessitate a large, cumbersome delivery system (into which the entire body
`
`would have to fit) in order to adequately deliver stimulation to targeted areas on the back or
`
`torso. Second, the device is described as a rigid bobbin through which the extremity is
`
`placed. This format makes application more difficult in that the applicator cannot be worn
`
`and therefore does not provide for consistent ideal placement of the extremity to maximize
`
`field effects. In fact, most designs of a similar nature are clinic-based devices and, therefore,
`
`would not be amenable to home healthcare applications as with the current invention. Third,
`
`the device described magnetic field within the bobbin is intended to have a maximum
`
`magnetic flux density in the range of 4.5 to 6 gauss. Studies (such as Trock et al in the
`
`Journal of Rheumatology 1 94 ; 21(10): 1903-191 1) have shown that PEMF stimulation in
`
`LUMENIS EX1082
`Page 7
`
`
`
`the range of 15-25 or more gauss are effective in the treatment of osteoarthritis or other
`
`musculoskeletal pain conditions.
`
`[0018]
`
`Pollack in U.S. Patent No. 5,014,699, issued 5/14/1991 describes a coil
`
`wound around the cast on an appendage for the delivery of PEMF treatment to fractured
`
`bone. The described device has shown promise for the treatment of fractured bone,
`
`especially nonunion or delayed healing fractures. However, the description of the device
`
`does not provide for extension of this application to the treatment of other conditions, such
`
`as arthritis, musculoskeletal pain, or atrophy.
`
`[0019]
`
`Imran in US Pat App No 2006/0052839 filed 9/7/2005 describe the use of an
`
`implantable stimulator for the treatment of chronic back pain. While this modality may be
`
`effective at treating back pain, it requires a major surgery and will eventually suffer from
`
`habituation as the area around the needle fibroses and the nerve becomes deadened to
`
`repeated stimulation.
`
`SUMMARY
`
`[0020]
`
`In certain variations, systems for electromagnetic induction therapy may
`
`include one or more conductive coils disposed within or along an applicator. The coils may
`
`be configured to generate a magnetic field focused on a target nerve, muscle or other body
`
`tissues in proximity to the coil. One or more sensors may be utilized to detect electrical
`
`conduction in the target nerve, to detect a muscular response caused by an electrical
`
`conduction in the target nerve, or to detect stimulation of a nerve, muscle or other body
`
`tissues and to provide feedback about the efficacy of the applied electromagnetic induction
`
`therapy. A controller in communication with the sensor may be adjustable to vary a current
`
`through the at least one coil so as to adjust the magnetic field focused upon the target nerve,
`
`muscle or other body tissues. Optionally, a user or patient may detect stimulation of a nerve,
`
`muscle or body tissue and the therapy may be adjusted based on feedback from the user or
`
`patient.
`
`[0021]
`
`In certain variations, the applicator may be configured to intermittently apply
`
`or deliver pulsed magnetic fields to a target nerve, muscle or tissue without causing
`
`habituation of the target nerve, muscle or tissue.
`
`LUMENIS EX1082
`Page 8
`
`
`
`[0022]
`
`In certain variations, methods of electromagnetic induction therapy may
`
`include one or more of the following steps. A first portion of a patient's body may be
`
`positioned relative to or in proximity to an applicator or an applicator may be positioned
`
`relative to or in proximity to a first portion of a patient's body, such that a target nerve,
`
`muscle or tissue within the first portion of the body is in proximity to one or more
`
`conductive coils disposed within or along the applicator. A current may be passed through a
`
`coil to generate a magnetic field focused on the target nerve, muscle or tissue. An electrical
`
`conduction through the target nerve, a muscular response caused by an electrical conduction
`
`through the target nerve or stimulation of a nerve, muscle, or body tissue may be detected by
`
`a sensor positioned along a second portion of the body. A signal from the sensor indicative
`
`of the electrical conduction or stimulation may be received, which provides feedback about
`
`the efficacy of the applied electromagnetic induction therapy. The current may be adjusted
`
`by a controller in communication with the conductive coils based on the feedback.
`
`[0023]
`
`Optionally, a user may detect stimulation of a nerve, muscle or body tissue
`
`and the therapy may be adjusted based on feedback from the user. In certain variations,
`
`pulsed magnetic fields may be intermittently applied or delivered a target nerve, muscle or
`
`tissue without causing habituation of the target nerve, muscle or tissue. Such intermittent
`
`magnetic fields may be used to treat chronic conditions, e.g., chronic pain, without causing
`
`habituation.
`
`[0024]
`
`In certain variations, applicators may be ergonomic or may be designed or
`
`configured to accommodate, approximate or be positioned relative to or in proximity to
`
`specific regions of the body or anatomy. The specific regions of the body or anatomy may
`
`be positioned relative to the applicators, or the applicators may be positioned relative to the
`
`specific regions of the body or anatomy to treat various conditions, for example,
`
`osteoarthritis, arthritis, back or neck pain, atrophy or paralysis, chronic pain, phantom or
`
`neuropathic pain, neuralgia, migraines, orthopedic conditions.
`
`[0025]
`
`Other features and advantages will appear hereinafter. The features and
`
`elements described herein can be used separately or together, or in various combinations of
`
`one or more of them.
`
`BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
`
`LUMENIS EX1082
`Page 9
`
`
`
`[0026]
`
`The drawings constitute a part of this specification and include exemplary
`
`embodiments of the invention, which may be embodied in various forms. It is to be
`
`understood that in some instances various aspects of the embodiments may be shown
`
`exaggerated or enlarged to facilitate an understanding of the embodiments.
`
`[0027]
`
`FIG. 1 is a schematic view of an apparatus for magnetic induction therapy
`
`according to a first variation.
`
`[0028]
`
`FIG. 2 is a schematic view of an apparatus for magnetic induction therapy
`
`according to a second variation.
`
`[0029]
`
`FIG. 3 is a schematic view of an apparatus for magnetic induction therapy
`
`according to a third variation.
`
`[0030]
`
`FIG. 4 is a schematic view of an apparatus for magnetic induction therapy
`
`according to a fourth variation.
`
`[0031]
`
`FIG. 5 is a schematic view of an apparatus for magnetic induction therapy
`
`according to a fifth variation.
`
`[0032]
`
`FIGS. 6A-6D are schematic illustrations depicting a first method of use of an
`
`apparatus for magnetic induction therapy. This method is based on adjusting the position of
`
`the conductive coils so to optimize a magnetic flow applied to a target nerve.
`
`[0033]
`
`FIGS. 7A-7D are schematic illustrations of a second method of use of an
`
`apparatus for magnetic induction therapy. This method is based on locking the conductive
`
`coils in position once electrical conduction in a target nerve has been detected.
`
`[0034]
`
`[0035]
`
`FIG. 8 is a schematic view of a variation that includes a plurality of sensors.
`
`FIGS. 9A-9D are schematic representations of different garments adapted to
`
`operate as apparatus for magnetic induction therapy.
`
`[0036]
`
`FIG. 10 is a schematic view of an apparatus for providing electrical
`
`stimulation.
`
`[0037]
`
`FIG. 11 is a schematic view of another variation of an apparatus for
`
`providing electrical stimulation.
`
`[0038]
`
`FIG. 12 shows a schematic view of an energy emitting system including a
`
`microneedle patch sensor.
`
`[0039]
`
`patches.
`
`FIG. 13-15 shows magnified bottom views of variations of microneedle
`
`LUMENIS EX1082
`Page 10
`
`
`
`[0040]
`
`patch.
`
`[0041]
`
`[0042]
`
`FIGS. 16-17 shows magnified side views of variations of a microneedle
`
`FIG. 18 shows a magnified bottom perspective view of a microneedle patch.
`
`FIG. 9 shows a representative cross sectional view of the skin composed of
`
`an outer stratum corneum covering the epidermal and dermal layers of skin and the
`
`underlying subcutaneous tissue, with a variation of a microneedle patch attached thereto.
`
`[0043]
`
`FIG. 20a shows a magnified side view of a variation of a microneedle patch
`
`including multiple electrodes.
`
`[0044]
`
`FIG. 20b-20D show variations of a microneedle patches including multiple
`
`electrodes.
`
`[0045]
`
`FIG. 2 1 shows a schematic view of an energy emitting system including a
`
`microneedle patch sensor placed behind a subject's knee.
`
`[0046]
`
`FIGS. 22-23 show schematic views of energy emitting systems including an
`
`electrode needle and sensor.
`
`[0047]
`
`FIGS. 24-25 show schematic views of energy emitting systems including an
`
`electrode needle without a sensor.
`
`[0048]
`
`FIG. 26 shows a schematic view of an energy emitting system including a
`
`microneedle patch for providing stimulation.
`
`[0049]
`
`FIGS. 27-28 show schematic views of energy emitting systems including an
`
`electrode needle and microneedle patch for providing stimulation.
`
`[0050]
`
`FIG. 29a-29d show a prospective, side, top and rear views of an energy
`
`emitting device in the form of a foot cradle.
`
`[0051]
`
`FIGS 30A-30B show schematic views of an energy emitting device in the
`
`form of a knee support.
`
`[0052]
`
`FIGs. 3 1A-3 1B show a schematic view of a variation of an arm applicator
`
`and a foot, knee or leg applicator.
`
`[0053]
`
`[0054]
`
`FIG. 32 shows a schematic view of a variation of a back applicator.
`
`FIG. 33 shows a schematic view of a variation of a system including a back
`
`applicator, a sensor and logic controller.
`
`[0055]
`
`FIG. 34 shows a schematic view of system including multiple back
`
`applicators, a sensor and logic controller.
`
`LUMENIS EX1082
`Page 11
`
`
`
`[0056]
`
`FIG. 35 shows a schematic view of a variation of a system including a back
`
`applicator held on a patient's body by an ergonomic positioning element in the form of a
`
`belt and a logic controller.
`
`[0057]
`
`FIG. 36 shows a schematic view of a variation of an applicator designed to
`
`stimulate a nerve responsible for phantom or neuropathic pain.
`
`[0058]
`
`FIG. 37 shows a schematic view of a variation of a facial neuralgia
`
`applicator.
`
`[0059]
`
`FIG. 38 shows a schematic view of a variation of an applicator which may be
`
`placed over the occipital nerve for the treatment of migraines.
`
`[0060]
`
`FIG. 39 shows a schematic view of a variation of an applicator which may be
`
`placed over the frontal cortex for the treatment of depression.
`
`[0061]
`
`FIG. 40 shows a schematic view of a variation an applicator in the form of a
`
`stimulatory coil platform for positioning one or more coils in proximity to a knee or
`
`popliteal nerve.
`
`[0062]
`
`FIG. 4 1 shows a schematic view of a system including a variation of a back
`
`applicator held on a patient's body by an ergonomic positioning element in the form of a
`
`shoulder harness, a sensor, and a logic controller.
`
`[0063]
`
`Figures 42A and 42B show an example of how the amount of stimulatory
`
`power required to achieve a desired stimulus may be automatically adjusted as a result of
`
`fibroses.
`
`[0064]
`
`Figures 43A and 43B show variations of a coil device positioned on a skull.
`
`DETAILED DESCRIPTION
`
`[0065]
`
`In certain variations, apparatus and methods for magnetic induction therapy,
`
`in which dosage of magnetic energy can be regulated according to conduction in a target
`
`nerve exposed to the magnetic field are provided.
`
`[0066]
`
`In certain variations, apparatus and methods for magnetic induction therapy,
`
`in which the flow of magnetic energy can be adjusted directionally by the patient or a
`
`healthcare provider without altering the position of a housing containing conductive coils
`
`that produce the magnetic field are provided.
`
`LUMENIS EX1082
`Page 12
`
`
`
`[0067]
`
`In certain variations, apparatus and methods for treating a variety of ailments
`
`by providing energy to a target nerve, for example magnetic energy, electrical energy or
`
`ultrasound energy, at a location and in an amount optimized by detecting conduction in the
`
`target nerve are provided.
`
`[0068]
`
`In certain variations, an energy emitting apparatus for delivering a medical
`
`therapy that includes one or more energy generators, a logic controller electrically connected
`
`to the one or more energy generators, and one or more sensors for detecting electric
`
`conduction in a target nerve, which are connected to the logic controller is provided. The
`
`one or more energy generators produce energy focused on the target nerve upon receiving a
`
`signal from the logic controller, and the applied energy is varied by the logic controller
`
`according to an input provided by the one or more sensors based on electric conduction in
`
`the target nerve. The feedback provided by the sensors to the logic controller about the
`
`efficacy of the applied treatment causes the logic controller to modulate the current
`
`transmitted to the coils.
`
`[0069]
`
`The applied energy may be a magnetic field, an electrical field, an ultrasound,
`
`a visible light, or an infrared or an ultraviolet energy. When a magnetic field is applied, the
`
`energy-emitting device is an apparatus that provides a magnetic induction therapy and that
`
`includes one or more conductive coils disposed in an ergonomic housing. A logic controller
`
`is electrically connected to the one or more coils, and one or more sensors detect electric
`
`conduction in the target nerve and are connected to the logic controller so to provide a
`
`feedback to the logic controller. The conductive coils receive an electric current from the
`
`logic controller and produce a magnetic field focused on a target nerve, and the electric
`
`current fed by the logic controller is varied by the logic controller according to an input
`
`provided by the sensors, thereby causing amplitude, frequency or direction of the magnetic
`
`field, or the firing sequence of the one or more coils, to be varied according to the efficiency
`
`of the treatment provided to the target nerve. In certain variations, the housing containing
`
`the conductive coils may be a flexible wrap, a cradle or a garment, and the coils may be
`
`overlapping and/or be disposed in different positions within the housing, so to generate a
`
`magnetic field on different body parts with the desired direction and amplitude.
`
`[0070]
`
`The one or more coils may be stationary or movable within the housing,
`
`making it possible to optimize the direction of magnetic flow to the target nerve by
`
`LUMENIS EX1082
`Page 13
`
`
`
`disposing the coils in the most effective direction. In different variations, the coils may be
`
`movable manually by acting on a knob, lever, or similar type of actuator, or may be
`
`translated automatically by the logic controller in response to the input provided by the
`
`sensors. When a p

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ ChargeStill Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site